Systems and methods for processing machine learning attributes are disclosed. An example method includes: identifying a user transaction associated with a set of transaction attributes and a first transaction status; selecting, based on a risk evaluation model, a first plurality of transaction attributes from the set of transaction attributes; modifying a first value of a first transaction attribute in the first plurality of transaction attributes to produce a first modified plurality of transaction attributes; determining, based on the risk evaluation model, that the first modified plurality of transaction attributes identify a second transaction status different from the first transaction status; and in response to the determining, identifying the first transaction attribute as a risk attribute associated with the user transaction.

Methods, systems and computer program products are provided personalizing recommendations of items with associated explanations. The example embodiments described herein use contextual bandits to personalize explainable recommendations (“recsplanations”) as treatments (“Bart”). Bart learns and predicts satisfaction (e.g., click-through rate, consumption probability) for any combination of item, explanation, and context and, through logging and contextual bandit retraining, can learn from its mistakes in an online setting.

A multi-year yield analysis in precision agriculture characterizes variables affecting crop yield to enable site-specific prescription mapping for a bounded field. Remotely-sensed imagery of the bounded field is incorporated as a replacement for, or in addition to, one or more of coverage data, uniformity data, age data, and weather data that comprise variables in the multi-year yield analysis. The multi-year yield analysis enables recommendations for variable-rate applications to the bounded field such as seeding, fertilizing, and applying crop treatments.

An embodiment of the present invention is directed to automated trust discretionary distribution decisions. The innovative system comprises a computer server configured to perform the steps of: receiving, via an electronic input, a trust beneficiary cash distribution request relating to a trust instrument; responsive to the trust beneficiary request, obtaining trust details relating to the trust instrument; applying, via a computer server, a trust decision predictor to the distribution request to generate a trust decision wherein the trust decision predictor considers a set of decision factors comprising the trust beneficiary cash distribution request, beneficiary details, trust details and applicability of governing restrictions; presenting, via an electronic interface, the trust decision; automatically executing the trust decision; and applying feedback data to refine and standardize the trust decision predictor.

An embodiment of the present invention is directed to automated trust discretionary distribution decisions. The innovative system comprises a computer server configured to perform the steps of: receiving, via an electronic input, a trust beneficiary cash distribution request relating to a trust instrument; responsive to the trust beneficiary request, obtaining trust details relating to the trust instrument; applying, via a computer server, a trust decision predictor to the distribution request to generate a trust decision wherein the trust decision predictor considers a set of decision factors comprising the trust beneficiary cash distribution request, beneficiary details, trust details and applicability of governing restrictions; presenting, via an electronic interface, the trust decision; automatically executing the trust decision; and applying feedback data to refine and standardize the trust decision predictor.

An inference device, an inference method, and an inference program that can realize high precision inference regardless of an application target are provided. An inference device includes: an acquisition section configured to acquire a time series data group measured in accordance with processing of a target object in a predetermined processing unit of a manufacturing process; and an inference section configured to tune respective output data that is output by processing the acquired time series data group using a plurality of network sections that have been machine-learned in advance and to output an inference result by combining the respective tuned output data; wherein the inference section is configured to tune the respective output data using a correction parameter corresponding to an error included in the inference result.

A non-transitory computer-readable recording medium storing a risk analysis program for an artificial intelligence (AI) system, the analysis program being a program for causing a computer to execute processing, the processing including: acquiring a plurality of pieces of relational information that include at least two attributes among an attribute of a type of an object person, an attribute of a type of processing, and an attribute of a type of data, wherein the relational information is determined on a basis of a configuration of the AI system; determining a priority of the plurality of pieces of relational information on a basis of the attribute of the type of the object person; and outputting one or a plurality of check items selected on a basis of the determined priority from among a plurality of check items associated with each attribute as a checklist for the AI system.

There is a need for more effective and efficient data evaluation. This need can be addressed by, for example, techniques for data evaluation in accordance with a shared decision tree data object. In one example, a method includes generating, using a plurality of feature extraction threads, shared evidentiary data; generating, based on a selected shared evidentiary data subset of the shared evidentiary data that correspond to one or more selected nodes of the shared decision tree data object, refined evidentiary data; processing the refined evidentiary data in accordance with the shared decision tree data object to generate an evaluation output and an explanation output; and displaying an evaluation output user interface comprising user interface data describing the evaluation output and the explanation output.

Typical autonomous systems implement black-box models for tasks such as motion detection and triaging failure events, and as a result are unable to provide an explanation for its input features. An explainable framework may utilize one or more explainable white-box architectures. Explainable models allow for a new set of capabilities in industrial, commercial, and non-commercial applications, such as behavioral prediction and boundary settings, and therefore may provide additional safety mechanisms to be a part of the control loop of automated machinery, apparatus, and systems. An embodiment may provide a practical solution for the safe operation of automated machinery and systems based on the anticipation and prediction of consequences. The ability to guarantee a safe mode of operation in an autonomous system which may include machinery and robots which interact with human beings is a major unresolved problem which may be solved by an exemplary explainable framework.

A building management system includes connected equipment configured to measure a plurality of monitored variables and a predictive diagnostics system configured to receive the monitored variables from the connected equipment; generate a probability distribution of the plurality of monitored variables; determine a boundary for the probability distribution using a supervised machine learning technique to separate normal conditions from faulty conditions indicated by the plurality of monitored variables; separate the faulty conditions into sub-patterns using an unsupervised machine learning technique to generate a fault prediction model, each sub-pattern corresponding with a fault, and each fault associated with a fault diagnosis; receive a current set of the monitored variables from the connected equipment; determine whether the current set of monitored variables correspond with one of the sub-patterns of the fault prediction model to facilitate predicting whether a corresponding fault will occur; and determining the fault diagnosis associated with the predicted fault.