A forward velocity and a roll angle associated with an aircraft is received, where the aircraft includes a multicopter with a plurality of rotors which rotate in a substantially horizontal plane. A yaw rate offset is determined based at least in part on the forward velocity and the roll angle, where the yaw rate offset increases over a first forward velocity range and decreases over a second forward velocity range and the yaw rate offset changes monotonically with the roll angle. A desired yaw rate is determined based at least in part on the yaw rate offset and a yaw rate specified via a hand control. A plurality of control signals for the plurality of rotors is determined based at least in part on the desired yaw rate.

A forward velocity and a roll angle associated with an aircraft is received, where the aircraft includes a multicopter with a plurality of rotors which rotate in a substantially horizontal plane. A yaw rate offset is determined based at least in part on the forward velocity and the roll angle, where the yaw rate offset increases over a first forward velocity range and decreases over a second forward velocity range and the yaw rate offset changes monotonically with the roll angle. A desired yaw rate is determined based at least in part on the yaw rate offset and a yaw rate specified via a hand control. A plurality of control signals for the plurality of rotors is determined based at least in part on the desired yaw rate.

A flight-time variable associated with an aircraft is determined including by determining the flight-time variable while the aircraft is flying. It is determined whether the aircraft is airworthy based at least in part on the flight-time variable. In response to determining that the aircraft is not airworthy, the aircraft is automatically landed.

A method for flight control of an aircraft with multiple actuators during flight is disclosed. For each actuator, a control command is computed according to at least one predetermined control law and based on pilot inputs and sensor measurements in relation to a physical state of the aircraft. The respective control commands are provided to the actuators. The control commands are independently monitored by estimating or measuring a current physical state of the aircraft and comparing it with the control commands. This comparison includes checking whether the control commands stabilize the aircraft in a stable state in the absence of both disturbances and pilot inputs according to at least one predefined criterion. If the monitoring indicates a lack of stability, transmission of the control commands is prevented and a backup control command is computed for each actuator.

A method for flight control of an aircraft with multiple actuators during flight is disclosed. For each actuator, a control command is computed according to at least one predetermined control law and based on pilot inputs and sensor measurements in relation to a physical state of the aircraft. The respective control commands are provided to the actuators. The control commands are independently monitored by estimating or measuring a current physical state of the aircraft and comparing it with the control commands. This comparison includes checking whether the control commands stabilize the aircraft in a stable state in the absence of both disturbances and pilot inputs according to at least one predefined criterion. If the monitoring indicates a lack of stability, transmission of the control commands is prevented and a backup control command is computed for each actuator.

The present disclosure discloses a method for attitude control of a quadrotor UAV, comprising establishing an attitude dynamics model of the quadrotor UAV, establishing a motion equation and a state-space equation of a UAV control system, determining an LADRC-CFO, and establishing a differential tracker for reducing a system overshoot.

The present disclosure discloses a method for attitude control of a quadrotor UAV, comprising establishing an attitude dynamics model of the quadrotor UAV, establishing a motion equation and a state-space equation of a UAV control system, determining an LADRC-CFO, and establishing a differential tracker for reducing a system overshoot.

The present disclosure discloses a method for attitude control of a quadrotor UAV, comprising establishing an attitude dynamics model of the quadrotor UAV, establishing a motion equation and a state-space equation of a UAV control system, determining an LADRC-CFO, and establishing a differential tracker for reducing a system overshoot.

The present disclosure discloses a method for attitude control of a quadrotor UAV, comprising establishing an attitude dynamics model of the quadrotor UAV, establishing a motion equation and a state-space equation of a UAV control system, determining an LADRC-CFO, and establishing a differential tracker for reducing a system overshoot.

A heading control system for an aircraft arranged to maintain a heading of an aircraft by controlling a nose wheel angle of the aircraft. The heading control system includes an interface arranged to receive a bias signal indicating a bias towards the port or the starboard of the aircraft and one or more processors. The one or more processors are arranged to determine, based on the bias signal, an offset angle defining an offset from a longitudinal axis of the aircraft and to perform a control process to control the nose wheel angle within an angular range based on the offset angle.