A system and method are disclosed for formulating a sequential equivalency problem for fault (non)propagation with minimal circuit logic duplication by leveraging information about the location and nature of a fault. The system and method further apply formal checking to safety diagnoses and efficiently models simple and complex transient faults.

A system and method are disclosed for formulating a sequential equivalency problem for fault (non)propagation with minimal circuit logic duplication by leveraging information about the location and nature of a fault. The system and method further apply formal checking to safety diagnoses and efficiently models simple and complex transient faults.

A method of assessing the security of an electronic device comprising software and hardware. The method includes: performing one or more security tests on the software; generating one or more software security metrics based on results of the one or more security tests performed on the software; performing one or more security tests on an integrated circuit hardware design for the hardware; generating one or more hardware security metrics based on results of the one or more security tests performed on the integrated circuit hardware design; and generating one or more electronic device security metrics based on the one or more hardware security metrics and the one or more software security metrics, the one or more electronic device security metrics providing a quantitative indication of the security of the electronic device

A hardware monitor arranged to assess performance of a hardware design for an integrated circuit to complete a task. The hardware monitor includes monitoring and counting logic configured to count a number of cycles between start and completion of the symbolic task in the hardware design; and property evaluation logic configured to evaluate one or more formal properties related to the counted number of cycles to assess the performance of the hardware design in completing the symbolic task. The hardware monitor may be used by a formal verification tool to exhaustively verify that the hardware design meets a desired performance goal and/or to exhaustively identify a performance metric (e.g. best case and/or worst case performance) with respect to completion of the task.

A hardware monitor arranged to assess performance of a hardware design for an integrated circuit to complete a task. The hardware monitor includes monitoring and counting logic configured to count a number of cycles between start and completion of the symbolic task in the hardware design; and property evaluation logic configured to evaluate one or more formal properties related to the counted number of cycles to assess the performance of the hardware design in completing the symbolic task. The hardware monitor may be used by a formal verification tool to exhaustively verify that the hardware design meets a desired performance goal and/or to exhaustively identify a performance metric (e.g. best case and/or worst case performance) with respect to completion of the task.

The following description is directed to a logic repository service supporting adaptable host logic. In one example, a method of a logic repository service can include receiving a first request to generate configuration data for configurable hardware using a specification for application logic. The method can include selecting a particular host logic shell from a group of host logic shells. The particular host logic shell can be used to encapsulate the application logic when the configurable hardware is configured. Configuration data for the configurable hardware can be generated. The configuration data can include data for implementing the application logic and at least a portion of the particular host logic shell. The method can include receiving a second request to download the configuration data to a host server computer comprising the configurable hardware. The configuration data can be transmitted to the host server computer in response to the second request.

The following description is directed to a logic repository service supporting adaptable host logic. In one example, a method of a logic repository service can include receiving a first request to generate configuration data for configurable hardware using a specification for application logic. The method can include selecting a particular host logic shell from a group of host logic shells. The particular host logic shell can be used to encapsulate the application logic when the configurable hardware is configured. Configuration data for the configurable hardware can be generated. The configuration data can include data for implementing the application logic and at least a portion of the particular host logic shell. The method can include receiving a second request to download the configuration data to a host server computer comprising the configurable hardware. The configuration data can be transmitted to the host server computer in response to the second request.

The present disclosure provides a satisfiability modulo theory (SMT) modeling system that includes graphical representation circuitry to generate graphical data representing a circuit design; finite state machine (FSM) discovery circuitry to discover, based on a feedback loop of the circuit design, an FSM contained within the graphical data; SMT assertion generation circuitry to generate an SMT assertion set of the FSM, based on the combinatorial and/or sequential logic elements associated with the FSM; and SMT modeling circuitry to determine a behavior of the FSM by applying one or more logical functions to the SMT assertion set.

Formal verification methods are used to solve a valid model of a design-under-test (DUT) to enumerate valid coverage points based on an architectural specification of the DUT. A formal solver can be queried to solve for valid solutions by crossing one or more fields of a variable. After each valid solve, values of the variable fields can be recorded and a count for number of valid solutions can be incremented. A new rule can be added to the solving process after each valid solve to invalidate the recorded values of the variable fields for subsequent solves. The count for the number of valid solutions can provide a running total of the valid solutions found for the query. Results of the query can be processed to convert the recorded values to provide the enumerated coverage points. The enumerated coverage points can be converted to test cases for running simulations on the DUT.

Formal verification methods are used to solve a valid model of a design-under-test (DUT) to enumerate valid coverage points based on an architectural specification of the DUT. A formal solver can be queried to solve for valid solutions by crossing one or more fields of a variable. After each valid solve, values of the variable fields can be recorded and a count for number of valid solutions can be incremented. A new rule can be added to the solving process after each valid solve to invalidate the recorded values of the variable fields for subsequent solves. The count for the number of valid solutions can provide a running total of the valid solutions found for the query. Results of the query can be processed to convert the recorded values to provide the enumerated coverage points. The enumerated coverage points can be converted to test cases for running simulations on the DUT.