PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING CARDIAC DATA OF A LIVING BEING

Abstract

Cardiac data of a living being is processed by a processing unit comprising a first fractional flow reserve (FFR) providing unit (11) for providing first FFR values being indicative of the FFR of different arteries of the living being, wherein said virtual FFR values were calculated from non-invasive imaging data of arteries of the living being; a second FFR providing unit (12) for providing FFR values measured in the arteries of the living being; a correction unit (13) configured to correct the first FFR values based on the second FFR values; and a display unit (14) configured to display at least one first FFR value and a second FFR value for a corresponding position in the coronary arteries. The first and second FFR values are displayed to a cardiologist, who can base his course of action on the simulated and corrected values.

Claims

1. A processing apparatus for processing cardiac data of a living being, the apparatus comprising a first fractional flow reserve value providing unit configured to provide first fractional flow reserve values being indicative of the fractional flow reserve of different arteries of the living being, wherein said virtual fractional flow reserve values were calculated from non-invasive imaging data of arteries of the living being; a second fractional flow reserve value providing unit configured to provide fractional flow reserve values measured in the arteries of the living being; and a correction unit configured to correct the provided first fractional flow reserve values based on the provided second fractional flow reserve values.

2. Processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the correction unit corrects at least one first fractional flow reserve value for a position in the coronary arteries of the living being by replacing it with a second fractional flow reserve value that is measured at the same position in the coronary arteries of the living being.

3. Processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the correction unit corrects a first fractional reserve value at a position for which a second fractional flow reserve value is not or not yet available by recalculating said first fractional flow reserve using at least one second fractional flow reserve value of a different position in the coronary arteries of the living being.

4. Processing apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising an arterial tree model providing unit, wherein a provided arterial tree model was determined from the non-invasive imaging data of the coronary arteries of the living being, in-artery imaging or both.

5. Processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the correction unit is configured to correct the first fractional flow reserve values whenever a new second fractional flow reserve value is provided.

6. Processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the correction unit only corrects a first fractional flow reserve value when the difference between the first fractional flow reserve value and the second fractional flow reserve value is above a predetermined threshold value.

7. Processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein first fractional flow reserve values were calculated within 10 seconds from obtaining the non-invasive imaging data of the coronary arteries of the living being.

8. An apparatus for evaluating cardiac data of a living being, comprising a processing apparatus according to claim 1; and a display unit configured to display at least one first fractional flow reserve value and a corresponding second fractional flow reserve value for a corresponding position in the coronary arteries.

9. An apparatus according to claim 8, further comprising an imaging device for non-invasive imaging a cardiac region of a living being; the imaging device comprising a processing unit for determining fractional flow reserve values; and a measurement device for in-artery measuring of fractional flow reserve values.

10. An apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the imaging device further comprises an image processing unit for reconstructing three dimensional image data from detection data detected by the imaging device.

11. An apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the display unit is configured to display corrected fractional flow reserves whenever a first fractional flow reserve value is corrected.

12. Method for assessment of stenosis in an artery of a living being, comprising the steps of receiving first fractional flow reserve values of the arterial tree calculated from data obtained from non-invasive imaging of the arterial tree; displaying the first fractional flow reserve in relation to the position in the artery; receiving second fractional flow reserve values of the arterial tree obtained from in-artery measurements; correcting the first fractional flow reserve values based on the second fractional flow reserve values; and displaying the second fractional flow reserve in relation to the position in the artery.

13. Method according to claim 12, further comprising providing an arterial tree model providing unit and wherein the first and second fractional flow reserve values are graphically displayed in relation to the position in the arterial tree.

14. Method according to claim 12, further comprising the step of calculating a first fractional reserve value at a position for which a second fractional flow reserve value is not or not yet available using at least one second fractional flow reserve value of a different position in the coronary arteries of the living being.

15. A computer program product for assessment of stenosis in an artery of a living being comprising instructions to execute the steps of the method according to claim 12 when the computer program product is run on the computer.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0016] In the following drawings:

[0017] FIG. 1 schematically and exemplarily shows an embodiment of a processing apparatus according to the present invention;

[0018] FIG. 2 schematically and exemplarily shows a further embodiment of a processing apparatus according to the present invention; and

[0019] FIG. 3a-f schematically and exemplary show an embodiment of information presented to a cardiologist over time when measured FFR values become available; and

[0020] FIG. 4 shows a flow chart for an embodiment of a method according to the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0021] FIG. 1 shows, schematically and exemplarily, an embodiment of a processing apparatus according to the present invention. In this embodiment the processing apparatus 1 comprises a first FFR value providing unit 11, a second FFR value providing unit 12, a correction unit 13. The FFR values are displayed with display unit 14.

[0022] The first FFR value providing unit 11 provides simulated FFR values obtained from an image processing unit 21 that processes images obtained from a non-invasive imaging device 2, such as a computed tomography imaging device, an ultrasound imaging device, a positron emission tomography imaging device, a magnetic resonance imaging device, an x-ray imaging device and other non-invasive imaging devices known to the skilled person or combinations thereof. The image processing unit 21 determines first FFR values from detection data detected by the non-invasive imaging device 2, e.g. by simulating the first FFR values through calculations based on reconstructed arterial information, such as coronary artery information, as is known in the art. Preferably, the first FFR value providing unit provides first FFR values for various locations in the arterial tree.

[0023] The second FFR value providing unit 12 provides FFR values obtained from in-artery measurements, e.g. measurements performed by a pressure wire 32 that is forwarded through a catheter 31 which is inserted into an artery 3, such as a coronary artery, wherein an arterial pressure is measured at at least two locations in the artery, e.g. before and after a known stenosis 33 in the artery 3. The second FFR value is then determined as the ratio between the pressure measured at the two locations. The location of the stenosis 33 may have been initially determined by visual inspection of reconstructed image data from a non-invasive imaging device or by through image analysis algorithms analyzing said reconstructed image data. Preferably, the reconstructed image data is obtained simultaneously or at least recently before obtaining the first FFR values using the same non-invasive imaging device 2.

[0024] In correction unit 13 the provided first and second FFR values for a location in the artery 3 are compared to each other and, if necessary, the first FFR value is corrected. It is reasonably assumed that the second FFR value reflects the actual situation in the artery 3 better than the first FFR value, since the second FFR value is an actual measured value, while the first FFR is only indirectly determined from the image data using algorithms that use imaging data and assumptions that inherently may cause errors in calculating the first FFR value. Therefore, the correction unit 13 gives more weight to the second FFR value, preferably it will simply replace the first FFR value by the second FFR value. This is the most straightforward and easy to implement correction that is possible. However, other corrections may be used as well, such as taking into account the location where the first and second FFR values were determined if they do not exactly align.

[0025] In a preferred embodiment the correction unit corrects a first FFR value at a position for which a second FFR value is not or not yet available by recalculating said first FFR value using at least one second FFR value of a different position in the coronary arteries of the living being. When measured data becomes available for a certain location it does not only improve the first FFR value at that location, it may also serve as a more realistic basis for (re-)calculating FFR values at other positions, e.g. further, in the artery 3, which results in more reliable and accurate information that is available to the cardiologist.

[0026] Furthermore, in a preferred embodiment the correction unit 13 only corrects the first FFR value when the difference between the first and second FFR value is above a predetermined threshold value, e.g. the difference is more than 1, 2, 5 or 10%. A difference below this threshold likely does not change the cardiologist's course of action, while time is saved by not needing to correct or recalculate first FFR values.

[0027] Display unit 14 displays the first and second FFR values to the cardiologist. This may done in the form of a table, a graphic image or any other suitable presentation of information. For instance, Example 1 shows how the information may be presented in the form of a table.

Example 1

[0028]

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Coronary Segment Simulated FFR Measured FFR Proximal LAD 0.6 pending . . . Distal LCX 0.75 pending . . . Proximal D1 0.8 pending . . .

[0029] Table 1 shows an initial situation of first (simulated) and second (measured) FFR values of three different coronary segments (Proximal LAD: Proximal left anterior descending, Distal LCX: Distal left circumflex artery, Proximal D1: Proximal Diagonal 1) that were identified as critical (FFR<=0.8). In another embodiment also non-critical segments may be shown. In this initial situation first FFR values were determined, but second FFR are not yet available, for instance because the in-artery measurement procedure has not yet begun or the measurement module has not yet reached these segments. The first FFR values are presented, while the phrase ‘pending’ is presented for the second FFR values. Other phrases, color codes, symbols (e.g. an hourglass) or simply a blank space are possible as well.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Coronary Segment Simulated FFR Measured FFR Proximal LAD (0.6) 0.55 Distal LCX 0.85 pending . . . Proximal D1 0.88 pending . . .

[0030] Table 2 shows the situation after an invasive measurement has been made for “Proximal LAD” and the simulation has been re-run. Simulated FFR has changed to 0.85 for “Distal LCX” and 0.88 for “Proximal D1”. The cardiologist may decide to skip invasive evaluation of these two segments as the simulation indicates that they are of secondary importance, thereby not extending the procedure unnecessarily. Of course, should the cardiologist decide he may still measure the FFR values at these sites, which then will further improve the reliability and accuracy of the presented information. The measurement confirmed that the “Proximal LAD” segment indeed has a critical FFR value, even lower than the simulated FFR. The correction unit 13 corrects the FFR value such that it will only take into account the measured FFR value for further calculations. The simulated FFR value for “Proximal LAD” is now shown between brackets to alert the cardiologist that this value has been corrected. Alternatively, it may also be replaced by the measured FFR value, blanked out, color coded or it may be indicated in another way that this value is not current anymore.

[0031] FIG. 2 shows, schematically and exemplarily, a further embodiment of a processing apparatus according to the present invention. This embodiment corresponds to the one shown in FIG. 1, but in addition the processing apparatus comprises an arterial tree providing unit 15. In this embodiment the arterial tree providing unit 15 provides a (3D-) modeled arterial tree of the living being or a segment thereof based on image data reconstructed in image processing unit 21. Said image data also formed the basis for the determination of the first FFR values, thereby ensuring an optimal match between the arterial tree information and the first FFR values, but it is also possible to use previously acquired image data, thereby reducing the examination time and radiation dose. Additionally or alternatively, the image data may (also) be based on imaging data acquired from in artery imaging, e.g. from a catheterized camera, for instance mounted on measuring catheter 31. This will provide an actual image from inside the artery, which may be used to improve the arterial tree model.

[0032] The arterial tree may be displayed by the display unit 14 to assist the cardiologist in determining stenosis locations. In a particularly preferred embodiment the first and second FFR values are displayed at or near the locations in the arterial tree where they were determined or measured. An illustrative example of this is given in FIG. 3a-3f. This example is not meant as a realistic representation of the procedure, but as a simplified way of illustrating the present invention.

[0033] In FIG. 3a a 3D model of an arterial tree segment is shown with first (simulated) FFR values for 5 positions in the arterial tree (indicated by the acronym SIM and the FFR value). When an FFR value is higher than a critical value (in this case FFR>0.8) it is indicated by the word ‘OK’. In case an FFR value is critical (in this case FFR<=0.8) a warning sign is shown. Alternatively this could be indicated differently, e.g. by flashing the critical values or by color coding in two or more colors, such as red for critical FFR, green for non-critical FFR and optionally orange for borderline cases (e.g. 0.8<FFR 0.85). In FIG. 3a the simulated FFR values show that there is one critical FFR value at the fourth position from the top.

[0034] In FIG. 3b a second (measured) FFR value has become available for the top position. In this example the simulated FFR value was replaced by the measured FFR value (indicated by the acronym MEAS and the new FFR value). Alternatively the original simulated FFR value may still be available (similar to the embodiment of Example 1 or other ways of indicating that the FFR value has been corrected for that location in the arterial tree). The FFR values of the other four shown locations are recalculated using the corrected FFR value for the top position. While the recalculation is proceeding, the cardiologist is informed of this by an hourglass symbol. Alternatively, this could be done in different ways (e.g. by using the phrase ‘pending’, ‘recalculating’ or the like or by color coding) or not at all (meaning the value is simply replaced when the new value is available).

[0035] FIG. 3c shows the result of the recalculated FFR values. Using the corrected, more reliable FFR value as the starting point confirms that the critical FFR value for the fourth position from the top. The recalculated FFR values for the 3.sup.rd and 5.sup.th positions from the top are still classified as not being critical, but they are so close to the critical value that further investigation will likely be considered by the cardiologist.

[0036] In FIG. 3d also a measured FFR value of the second position has become available, confirming the non-critical value for that position. Again the remaining simulated FFR values are recalculated. The result of which is shown in FIG. 3e, which now shows the corrected FFR values for the 3rd, 4th and 5th position from the top. Using the more accurate starting point for the calculations it is found that now also the 3.sup.rd and 5.sup.th positions from the top dropped below the critical value of 0.8. Since the simulated FFR value for 5th position from the top has become critical, further examination and measurement for that particular arterial branch is warranted, which might not have been done if only previous, less reliable simulated values would have been available. Should the simulated FFR value for that position be (clearly) non-critical, examination time could be reduced by not having to measure that particular branch.

[0037] In FIG. 3f the FFR value for the third position from the top has also been measured and the remaining two simulated FFR values were recalculated. The measured FFR for the third position is closer to the simulated value based on the previous measurement than the initial simulated value, which should be the case since the starting points for the calculations is much more accurate and reliable. This would likely influence treatment choices to avoid possible hazardous consequences of the arterial narrowing.

[0038] FIG. 4 shows a flow chart for a method for assessment of stenosis in an artery of a living being, comprising the steps of receiving 111 first fractional flow reserve values of the arterial tree calculated from data obtained from non-invasive imaging of the arterial tree; displaying 114 the first fractional flow reserve in relation to the position in the artery; receiving 112 the second fractional flow reserve values of the arterial tree obtained from in-artery measurements; correcting (113) the first fractional flow reserve values based on the second fractional flow reserve values; and displaying 114 the second fractional flow reserve in relation to the position in the artery.

[0039] In a preferred embodiment, the method further comprises providing 115 an arterial tree model providing unit and wherein the first and second fractional flow reserve data is graphically displayed 114 in relation to the position in the arterial tree.

[0040] In a further preferred embodiment, the method further comprises calculating a first fractional reserve value at a position for which a second fractional flow reserve value is not or not yet available using at least one second fractional flow reserve value of a different position in the coronary arteries of the living being.

[0041] The method may be executed by a computer program product comprising instructions to execute the steps of the method when the computer program product is run on the computer.

[0042] While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, such illustration and description are to be considered illustrative or exemplary and not restrictive; the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments.

[0043] Other variations to the disclosed embodiments can be understood and effected by those skilled in the art in practicing the claimed invention, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the appended claims.

[0044] In the claims, the word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality. A single processor or other unit may fulfill the functions of several items recited in the claims.

[0045] The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measured cannot be used to advantage.

[0046] A computer program may be stored/distributed on a suitable medium, such as an optical storage medium or a solid-state medium supplied together with or as part of other hardware, but may also be distributed in other forms, such as via the Internet or other wired or wireless telecommunication systems.

[0047] Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope.