SHAPED SAW WIRE WITH CONTROLLED CURVATURE AT BENDS
20170246697 · 2017-08-31
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B28D1/08
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B23D61/185
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B23D65/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B23D61/18
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B28D1/08
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A saw wire to cut hard and brittle materials is disclosed that comprises a steel wire that is provided with bends with segments in between. The average degree of bending of the bends is between 0.5% and 5%. Such a saw wire has a higher breaking load compared to saw wires having a conventional, higher average degree of bending. A method to measure the curvature is described as well as a process to make the inventive saw wire. The invention is applicable to any shaped saw wire for example a single crimped saw wire, a saw wire with at least two crimps in different planes, a saw wire with crimps rotating in a plane.
Claims
1. A saw wire for cutting hard and brittle materials comprising a steel wire with a diameter ‘d’ and a centreline, said saw wire having bends with segments in between, said centreline having a top curvature ‘k.sub.i’ at each of said bends when measured with a load of about one newton on said saw wire, wherein the average of the product of said top curvatures with half said diameter, over a length of saw wire comprising at least ‘N’ bends, with ‘N’ being not less than 50, is between 0.5 and 5 percent or in formula:
2. The saw wire according to claim 1 wherein said average is between 0.5% and 1.5%.
3. The saw wire according to claim 1 wherein said segments have a radius of curvature that is larger than 100×d.
4. The saw wire according to claim 3 wherein the total length of said segments is lower than 85% of the total centre line length of said steel wire.
5. The saw wire according to claim 1 wherein the maximum value of said products k.sub.i×d/2 does not exceed 0.05 i.e. 5%.
6. The saw wire according to claim 1 wherein the standard deviation of said products k.sub.i×d/2, over a length of saw wire comprising at least 50 bends is lower than 0.005 i.e. 0.5%.
7. The saw wire according to claim 1 wherein the number of bends is at least 10 over an axial length of 100 times the diameter ‘d’.
8. The saw wire according to claim 1 wherein said saw wire has a helicoidal shape around an axis and wherein said bends are oriented radially outward of said axis.
9. The saw wire according to claim 1 wherein said saw wire comprises crimps in the form of a wave in at least one plane comprising the axis of said saw wire.
10. The saw wire according to claim 9 wherein a first wave crimp is in a first plane, a second wave crimp is in a second plane, said first plane being different from said second plane, said first and second plane crossing one another along the axis of said saw wire.
11. The saw wire according to claim 9 wherein said at least one plane rotates around said axis along the axial length of said saw wire.
12. The saw wire according to claim 1 further comprising an abrasive layer fixed on the surface of said steel wire.
13. Method to produce the saw wire according to claim 1 comprising the steps of: Providing a steel wire of diameter ‘d’ with a breaking load F.sub.m in newton; Leading this steel wire over one or more bending devices having teeth with a teeth radius ‘R.sub.t’ under a tension ‘T’ in newton after the bending apparatus, thereby inducing bends at the teeth with segments between the teeth; characterised in that the teeth radius ‘R.sub.t’ is larger than 4 times the diameter ‘d’, while the tension ‘T’ is held between 3% and 30% of ‘F.sub.m’.
14. The method according to claim 13 wherein the bending device is a single toothed wheel over which the said steel wire spans at least 3 teeth.
15. The method according to claim 13 wherein the bending device is one or more intermeshing toothed wheel pairs through which the wire is led thereby forming crimps in said steel wire, and wherein the indentation of one tooth between the top of two facing teeth is set between 1 to 10 times the diameter ‘d’ of said steel wire.
16. The method according to claim 15 wherein two or more of said toothed wheel pairs induce crimps in different axial planes of said steel wire.
17. The method according to claim 13 wherein said one or more bending devices are rotating relative to the axis of said steel wire.
18. The saw wire according to claim 2 wherein said segments have a radius of curvature that is larger than 100×d.
19. The saw wire according to claim 10 wherein said at least one plane rotates around said axis along the axial length of said saw wire.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES IN THE DRAWINGS
[0064]
[0065]
[0066]
[0067]
[0068]
[0069]
MODE(S) FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0070]
[0071] In
[0072]
[0073]
[0074] In
[0075] These discrete points can now be manipulated computationally. For example by mathematically rotating the wire around the Z-axis at an angle of 59° the centreline of the wire shows a single crimp in one plane with a wavelength of 3.62 mm and a peak-to-peak amplitude of 59 μm. When virtually turning the wire further, a single second crimp occurs in a plane at an angle of 148° with a wavelength of 3.06 mm and an amplitude of 31 μm. So the saw wire is of the type that comprises two different crimps in planes that are under an angle of 89° to one another and cross at the axis of the saw wire.
[0076] In the software package LabVIEW (from National Instruments®) the traces were numerically differentiated according the Savitsky-Golay procedure. This procedure is a readymade ‘Virtual Instrument (*.vi)’ available in the software package (‘Savitzky-Golay Filter Coefficients.vi’). In this procedure the results of course depend on the degree ‘n’ of the polynomial used and the number of data points ‘2m+1’ in each vector.
[0077] After due experimentation the inventors found the settings ‘n=5’ and ‘m=9’ (i.e. there are 19 datapoints in the vector {13}) as most appropriate for the analysis of a saw wire. The length taken into account is then 19×50 μm or 0.95 mm which is about 8 diameters of the metal wire. Saw wires should be analysed over a length of between 4 to 10 times their diameter. Increasing the number of samples point in the analysis interval will ‘average out’ all features of the space curve. Using less sample points increases the noise too much.
[0078] The degree of the polynomial used should at least be 4. This is because a space curve in the tripod tangent, normal and binormal can be locally expressed in a third order polynomial in the curve length ‘s’. Higher order terms remain for absorbing the error. Using a polynomial degree that is higher than 5 is not useful as only the first three derivatives are used in curvature and torsion formulas. The higher order terms allow a better fit, but are of no use as only the lower order terms appear in the derivation.
[0079] It is further noteworthy to mention that the curvature is completely independent of the orientation of the wire between the chucks: the clamping of the wire must not be exactly diametrical to one another in order to obtain reliable results. It is only when one deforms the wire by applying tension that the curvature results change due to the deformation of the wire.
[0080] By the Savitsky-Golay procedure numerical estimates were obtained for the first and second derivatives in X and Y as per formula {14} and subsequently used in the expression for the curvature {8}. In this way for every data point (except the first 9 and 9 last points) a curvature ‘k’ can be calculated. For each point also the curve length ‘s’ can be calculated by using {15}. By now plotting the quantity ‘kd/2’ as a function of ‘s’ the graph of
[0081] In
[0082]
[0083] In a further module of LabVIEW, the top curvatures are detected and identified. Obviously only the peaks above the 0.5% threshold are identified. One can then easily extract the following statistics: [0084] 87 peaks are present in the range from 0 to 100 mm i.e. ‘N=87’ [0085] Hence the number of peaks per mm is 0.87 and the number of peaks per 100×d is 10.092. [0086] The average of the 87 k.sub.id/2 top bending values is 0.95% and the standard deviation is 0.24% [0087] The maximum k.sub.id/2 value observed is 2.5% (at ‘s’ equal to about 92 mm)
[0088] In a series of experiments a steel wire of diameter 115 μm with a tensile strength of 3650 N/mm.sup.2 was deformed between a pair of toothed wheels thus forming a single crimp wire. The following parameters were varied: [0089] The tension ‘T’ on the wire during crimping; [0090] The teeth radius ‘R.sub.t’ by using different toothed wheels with 0.3 (2.6×d), 0.5 (4.35×d), 1 (8.70×d), 1.5 (13×d) mm teeth radius. [0091] The wavelength of the crimp: 1.8, 2.8, 3.1 and 3.7 mm.
The samples obtained where analysed geometrically as described above, as well as their mechanical properties determined and in particular the tensile strength. The results are depicted in
[0092] In
[0093] For saw wires with an average bending degree of between 3 and 5% a tensile strength loss of between 10 and 14% can be expected. For thicker saw wires in the range of 200 μm to 300 μm this is still acceptable. This is indicated by the solid line bracket in
[0094] For wires with an average bending degree of between 1.5% and 3% a loss in tensile strength of between 5.5% and 10% is acceptable for wires of diameter 120 μm to 200 μm (the dashed bracket in
[0095] Finally for wires with an average bending degree of between 0.5 and 1.5% the smallest loss in tensile strength of between 1.5 and 5.5% is expected and therefore most appropriate for wires smaller or equal to 120 μm. This is indicated by the dotted bracket in
[0096] In a further series of experiments, the influence of the processing conditions was investigated. A straight steel wire with diameter ‘d’ of 120 μm was led through a first pair of deformation wheels of which the teeth have radii of 12.5 times ‘d’ and at different tension levels. The tension level is measured after passage through the bending apparatus. The indentation of the wheel was set to 2×d. Thereafter the average degree of bending was determined on the wires. In a second series of tests the same straight wire was deformed through a pair of wheels with teeth radii of 8.3×d, with the same different tension levels and the same degree of indentation.
[0097] The results are depicted in
[0098] A tooth radius of ‘8.3×d’ results in an average degree of bending within the preferred region of 0.50 to 1.50% for the smaller diameter of the steel wire. By preference the tension is held between 10 to 30% of the breaking load. However, the curvature shows a higher standard deviation.