Heat Pipes for a Single Well Engineered Geothermal System
20170248345 · 2017-08-31
Assignee
Inventors
- Michael J. PARRELLA (Weston, CT, US)
- Martin A. SHIMKO (Quechee, VT, US)
- Bart A. SIEGEL (Greenback, TN, US)
Cpc classification
F24T10/30
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F28F21/086
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F28F19/06
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F28D2015/0216
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F28F2275/06
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F28D15/0275
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y02E10/10
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
F24T10/40
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F28F21/085
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F28F21/08
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F28F19/06
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A heat pipe or a bundle of heat pipes for transporting geothermal heat in a well is provided. As the temperature rises at one end of the heat pipe, the operating fluid turns to a vapor which absorbs the latent heat. The hot vapor within the heat pipe flows to the cooler end of the heat pipe where it then condenses and releases the latent heat. The condensed fluid then flows back to the hot side of the heat pipe and the process repeats itself.
Claims
1. An apparatus for transporting geothermal heat from a geothermal well to a surface comprising: at least one heat pipe comprising a wall surrounding a central tube or chamber; a fluid contained within the central tube or chamber; a first apparatus end that is closed and positioned at a first end of the heat pipe, and a second apparatus end that is closed and positioned at a second end of the heat pipe; wherein the apparatus is configured to be in a vertical or inclined position in the geothermal well, and wherein the fluid absorbs geothermal heat at the first apparatus end as it transitions to a vapor, rises to the second apparatus end, releases geothermal heat at the second apparatus end as it condenses back to a liquid state, and returns to the first apparatus end.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first apparatus end is configured for placement in the geothermal well and the second apparatus end is configured for placement near the surface.
3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the wall of the at least one heat pipe further comprises: a copper layer surrounding the central tube or chamber; a steel layer surrounding the copper layer; and a titanium layer surrounding the steel layer; and wherein at least the copper layer and the titanium layer are non-porous to water.
4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the wall of the at least one heat pipe further comprises: an internal coating layer surrounding the central tube or chamber; an iron layer surrounding the internal coating layer, which is configured to protect the iron layer from the fluid in the central tube or chamber; and an external coating layer of a caustic resistant material surrounding the iron layer; and wherein at least the internal and external coating layers are non-porous to water.
5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one heat pipe is made from titanium.
6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one heat pipe comprises: a plurality of pipes welded together vertically; a base section secured to a base of the plurality of pipes; a threaded plug configured to be secured to an uppermost pipe of the plurality of pipes, which comprises corresponding threading; and a port comprised in the uppermost pipe of the plurality of pipes and positioned so as to be covered by the threaded plug when the threaded plug is fully inserted into the uppermost pipe; and wherein during assembly of the at least one heat pipe, the threaded plug is partially inserted into the plurality of pipes, the fluid is injected into the at least one heat pipe through the port, and the threaded plug is then inserted further into the plurality of pipes to cover the port.
7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the plurality of pipes, the threaded plug and the base section are made from titanium.
8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one heat pipe comprises a plurality of heat pipes arranged in a bundle surrounding a bundle central tube or chamber comprising the fluid.
9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the bundle of heat pipes comprises at least six heat pipes surrounding the bundle central tube or chamber, each of the heat pipes comprising the wall surrounding the central tube or chamber.
10. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the bundle of heat pipes comprises a plurality of bundles of heat pipes.
11. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the plurality of bundles of heat pipes comprises at least six bundles of heat pipes and comprises a total of at least seventy-two heat pipes.
12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the plurality of bundles of heat pipes are arranged to surround a further central tube or chamber comprising the fluid.
13. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one heat pipe comprises appendages branching outwardly from a central heat pipe configured to insertion into horizontal or angled bore holes in the geothermal well.
14. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one heat pipe is made from copper.
15. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one heat pipe is made from a copper-nickel alloy.
16. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the fluid is water.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0034] The present invention will now be described with reference made to
[0035] A heat pipe 10 is shown in
[0036] Many heat pipes 10 can be used in a geothermal well 201. One or more geothermal well 201, as shown in
[0037] A boiler 212 can be used to augment the geothermal well 201 or replace the geothermal well 201 for the heat required. The boiler 212 can also burn fossil fuel, crude oil or gas that naturally comes from an oil well, such as flaring gas.
[0038] Additionally, if an additional heat source 213, such as waste heat or electrical resistant heat, is available, the other heat source 213 can be used to supply additional heat. For example, on an offshore oil platform where it would be more difficult to implement a geothermal well, waste heat or a combination of waste heat, electrical heat and/or a boiler can be used to supply the heat source for heating and/or flooding the oil reservoir. The other heat source 213 supplies heat to a manifold 218, such as a hot water manifold, for providing the hot water to applications requiring the thermal output.
[0039] In accordance with the invention, multiple constructions of the heat pipe can be provided According to a first embodiment shown in
[0040] According to a second embodiment, shown in
[0041] A third embodiment of a heat pipe 50 is shown in
[0042] An embodiment for converting titanium pipes into a heat pipe 60 is shown in
[0043]
[0044]
[0045] In contrast to the single tube designs of
[0046] The thermal capacity of the design is approximately 100 kW and may cost approximately $0.18/W.
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050] In accordance with the present invention, there are several factors relevant to determining the appropriate construction of a heat pipe, including mechanical, thermal and environmental requirements.
[0051] A thermal evaluation of the potential effectiveness of the heat pipe includes examining the heat pipe power capacity limits of the fluid, or thermosiphon, used in the heat pipe. There are limiting factors for thermosiphons, including entrainment of flooding limits and boiling or evaporative limits. For example, water has a greater power capacity than methanol or other fluids when in the 100° C. to 200° C. range. The power limit of the thermosiphon depends on the gravity return of the condensate form of the fluid. The capillary limit does not apply and the viscosity limit is not an issue at higher temperatures. The sonic limit exceeds 2 kW at 100° C. and scales with the cross-sectional area of the heat pipe. The surface smoothness of the heat pipe also effects boiling of the thermosiphon. It is expected that entrainment is the main limiting factor where shear stress from the vapor flows up the heat pipe, which can prevent the counter flow of the condensate to the evaporator. This leads to “flooding” of the condenser.
[0052] A model can be used to estimate or project the entrainment or flooding limit of the thermosiphon. Suitable models found in the art include, for example: ESDU-81038 (1981) as reported in “Heat Pipes” by Dunn and Reay; Wallis (1969): Gas-liquid velocity criteria for flooding in counter-flow; Nguyen-Chi, H. and Groll, M.: Flooding Limit based on Wallis criteria with additional term for tube inclination; Taitel-Duckler (1976): Criteria for Kelvin-Helmholtz instability for finite waves in liquid films on inclined surfaces; and Weber number criteria with length scale based on the liquid film thickness. An example of an entrainment model estimating the liquid film thickness (t) in a tube 130 is shown in
[0053] The liquid velocity profile is integrated to get mass flow according to the following equation:
[0054] The shear stress balance can be determined according to the following equation:
[0055] The unity Weber number can be determined according to the following equation:
[0056] Table 2 shows predicted entrainment limited power:
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 T.sub.vapor = 121° C., Inclination = 60 degrees from vertical Tube ID (in.) 0.237 1.1 3.31 Tube ID (mm) 6.02 27.9 84.1 Annulus ID (mm) 0 0 28 Number in Bundle 72 6 1 Entrainment Limited Power for Individual Pipes (kW) ESDU *0.5 0.35 15.5 102 Chi-Groll *2.2 0.40 18.2 141 Wallis 0.43 20.3 156 Taitel Duckler *1.4 0.41 21.0 192 Entrainment Limited Power for Assembly (kW) ESDU *0.5 25 93 102 Chi-Groll *2.2 29 109 141 Wallis 31 122 156 Taitel Duckler *1.4 29 126 192 minimum 25 93 102 maximum 31 126 192
[0057] With respect to the possibility of power capacity being limited by boiling, it is estimated that there would be heat flux levels of 3.4, 7.5 and 22 W/cm.sup.2 for tubes having inner diameters of 6, 28 and 84 millimeters, respectively. At 100 kW total power over a 15 meter length for the evaporator, the heat flux levels are 0.49, 1.26 and 2.53 W/cm.sup.2 for tubes having inner diameters of 6, 28 and 84 millimeters, respectively. As a result, it is not expected that boiling of the thermosiphon should be a limiting condition for the heat pipes according to the invention.
[0058] It is estimated that for a heat pipe having a sixty degree inclination from vertical and at 121° C., the power transport for a heat pipe including pipes having a ⅜ inch outer diameter and a seventy-two pipe bundle (
[0059] A vapor shear test can be conducted with the purpose of determining the entrainment or flooding limited power capacity of a thermosiphon and to provide a baseline for scaling to other tube sizes. The return of liquid condensate by gravity down a thermosiphon tube is opposed by the shear stress from the counter-flow in vapor. The same shear stress conditions can be created in an air-water analog in an open tube. Tests can be done at different tube inclinations and liquid and gas flow rates to determine the conditions where liquid is unable to flow down the tube. An apparatus for the test can include a glass tube having a length of eight feet and an inner diameter of eight millimeters, pure deionized water introduced at the top of the tube, which flows down by gravity, and clean nitrogen gas introduced at the bottom of the tube, which flows to the top and exits. Water wets the glass tube just as it wets the thermosiphon wall material and the normal liquid flow and flow reversal at higher gas velocities can be observed. The tests can be performed at room temperature and the tube can be inclined at 30, 45 and 60 degrees from horizontal.
[0060] An energy equation is used to calculate mass flow rate of vapor and liquid and velocity of vapor. The shear stress is calculated based on vapor velocity for the round tube using standard friction factor correlations. The equivalent velocity of N.sub.2 gas is calculated to match vapor shear stress. Table 3 below shows test conditions to simulate water liquid vapor counter-flow at 100° C. The flow becomes unsteady at the conditions labeled with an asterisk in Table 3.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Angle Fluid N.sub.2 Gas Power Level of incline Flow rate Flow rate T.sub.a [watts] From horizontal [mL/min] [gm/min] [° C.] 400 30° 10.645 13.872 25 500 30° 13.306 17.340 25 600 30° 15.968 20.808 25 650 30° 17.298 22.542 24.4 660 30° 17.564 22.889 24.4 670* 30°* 17.831* 23.235* 24.4* 680* 30°* 18.097* 23.582* 24.4* 690* 30°* 18.363* 23.929* 24.4* 700* 30°* 18.629* .sup. 24.276 * 24.4* 650 45° 17.298 22.542 24.4 660 45° 17.564 22.889 24.4 670 45° 17.831 23.235 24.4 680 45° 18.097 23.582 24.4 690 45° 18.363 23.929 24.4 700 45° 18.629 24.276 24.8 710 45° 19.002 24.623 24.8 720 45° 19.27 24.969 24.8 730 45° 19.54 25.316 24.8 740* 45°* 19.8* 25.663* 24.8* 750* 45°* 19.96* 26.01* 24.8* 710 60° 18.895 24.623 23.6 720 60° 19.161 24.969 23.6 730 60° 19.427 25.316 23.6 740 60° 19.694 25.663 23.6 750* 60°* 19.96* 26.01* 23.6* 760* 60°* 20.226* 26.357* 23.6* 770* 60°* 20.492* 26.703* 23.6* 780* 60°* 20.758* 27.05* 23.6*
[0061] A shear test shows that as the angle of inclination of the pipe or tube increases, the power carrying capacity also increases to a limit. From testing an eight feet section of eight millimeter (inner diameter) tubing, it is estimated a pipe can carry from 600 W at an angle of inclination from horizontal of 30 degrees up to 750 watts at an angle of inclination of 60 degrees. Increasing the angle from 30 to 45 improves the power capacity by approximately 10%, but increasing the 45 to 60 improves the power carrying capacity by only 1.3%. Further, a second tube shaped with helical swirls around a W″ mandrel was built and tested which produced similar results, indicating the heat pipe will function with a transposed tube winding.
[0062] As shown and described in reference to
[0063]
[0064]
[0065] As the number of heat pipes increases from a heat pipe 150 to the heat pipe bundle 170, the diameter of the individual heat pipes 150, 162, 172 decreases. Exemplary dimensions for the heat pipes 150, 160, 170 of
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Single Tube Six tubes 72 tubes (FIG. 14a) (FIG. 14b) (FIG. 14c) # of tubes 1 6 72-90 Outer Diameter (OD) 5.25″ 1.75″ 0.375″ Inner diameter (ID) 3.31″ 1.10″ 0.237″ Wall Thickness (WT) 0.970″ 0.32″ 0.069″ OD/WT Ratio 5.4 5.4 5.4 Center hole diameter 1.5″ 1.75″ 1.75″ Length 100′ 100′ 100′
[0066] The material used for making the heat pipe wall may also vary based on compatibility with water as the working fluid, corrosion resistance to brine in the well bore, availability of tubes in the appropriate diameter and wall thickness material cost and ability to manufacture. One possible material is copper, which has a high thermal conductivity, compatibility with water as the working fluid, has well-known fabrication processes and is readily available at the lowest cost. A second material option is 70/30 cupro-nickel alloy, which is considered because of its excellent corrosion resistance and higher mechanical strength over copper. It is expected that it is compatible for making heat pipes having water, as a related material, Monel, is known to be acceptable. A third material for possible use is titanium KS50, which has superior mechanical strength, half of the weight of copper and excellent corrosion resistance. It is also known to be compatible with water for heat pipe use.
[0067] These three pipe materials are further compared in Table 5 below:
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Cu—Ni Titanium Copper 70/30 Grade 2 CP (CDA 102, (CDA (ASTM Commercial Availability Units 122, 110) 715) B-338) Density lb./in.sup.3 .321 .322 .163 Yield Strength kpsi 10 35 40 Ultimate strength kpsi 35 65 50 Young's Modulus ×10.sup.6 psi 15.1 18 15.2 Weight to Stiffness ratio 47 47 93 (2x) Percent Elongation % 40% 29% 10% to failure Coefficient of Thermal 10.sup.−6 in/ 9.4 8.6 5.2 Expansion (@350° F.) in - ° F. Thermal Conductivity W/m-K 390 29.4 18.5 (RT) Corrosion Resistance Good Better Best
[0068] A stress analysis, as a result of bending of the material, can be performed for each of these materials. Because the metals being considered are ductile, the analysis compares the calculated stress values to the yield stress. Yield stress is usually measured as 0.2% yield or proof strength, which is the stress that produces a 0.2% strain without recovering. Stresses investigated in the analysis include bending around a large radius during installation and hoop stresses caused from internal tube pressures at 350° F. and 600° F. temperatures and external pressures at 6,000, 8,000 and 10,000 feet below ground level. The bending stresses are calculated using Hooke's Law, where the strain at the extreme fiber of the tube outer diameter, and E is the modulus of elasticity in 10.sup.6 pounds per square inch (psi). Strain rate is determined from bending around the large radius, the appendage that must pass through during deployment into the hole. Strains can be determined for a forty feet and fifty feet bend radius. Hoop stresses can be determined using Lame's equation.
[0069] A summary of the bending stress analysis is shown in Table 6. The results labeled (*) indicate a possibility of the tube to yield during deployment, the results labeled (**) indicate an elastic tube, and the results with no asterisks indicate the tube will yield during deployment.
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Bending Stress, kpsi 5.25″ 1.75″ ⅜″ Bend Temp, OD OD OD Radius ° F. Material tube tube tube 40 350 Cu, annealed 82.5 27.5 5.9 ** 40 600 Cu, annealed 77.7 25.9 5.6 ** 50 350 Cu, annealed 66 22 4.7 ** 50 600 Cu, annealed 62.2 20.7 4.4 ** 40 350 70/30 Cu—Ni, annealed 98.3 32.8 7.0 ** 40 600 70/30 Cu—Ni, annealed 92.8 30.9 6.6 ** 50 350 70/30 Cu—Ni, annealed 78.7 26.2 * 5.6 ** 50 600 70/30 Cu—Ni, annealed 74.2 24.7* 5.3** 40 350 KS-50 Titanium 83.3 27.8** 5.9** 40 600 KS-50 Titanium 75.3 25.1** 5.4** 50 350 KS-50 Titanium 66.6 22.2** 4.8** 50 600 KS-50 Titanium 60.3 20.1** 4.3**
[0070] A sample analysis of the estimated cost for the three example raw materials is shown in Table 7:
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Units Cu Cu—Ni Ti Raw material cost $USD/lb. $4 $22 Tube Cost $/lb. 5.33 9.14 $30-60 (?) Weight of Heat Pipe Assembly per foot Single tube Lbs./ft. 50.28 50.44 25.42 Six Tubes Lbs./ft. 33.52 33.63 16.95 72 Tubes Lbs./ft. 18.47 18.53 9.34 Estimated Cost Per Heat Pipe Single tube $/ft. $268 $461 $782 Six Tubes $/ft. $178 $307 $522 72 Tubes $/ft. $98 $169 $287
[0071] A summary of the estimated raw material cost tradeoffs for the three example materials is shown in Table 8:
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Units Single Tube 6 Tube 72 Tube Power Carrying Capacity kW 120 100 30 Cost Per Watt Cu $/watt $.22 $.18 $.32 Cu—Ni $/watt $.38 $.31 $.56 Ti $/watt $.65 $.52 $.96
[0072] While there have been shown and described and pointed out fundamental novel features of the invention as applied to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood that various omissions and substitutions and changes in the form and details of the devices and methods described may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention. For example, it is expressly intended that all combinations of those elements and/or method steps which perform substantially the same function in substantially the same way to achieve the same results are within the scope of the invention. Moreover, it should be recognized that structures and/or elements and/or method steps shown and/or described in connection with any disclosed form or embodiment of the invention may be incorporated in any other disclosed or described or suggested form or embodiment as a general matter of design choice.