COATING REMOVAL METHOD AND GUIDE FOR USE THEREWITH
20170238690 · 2017-08-24
Inventors
- Howard Paul WEAVER (Cincinnati, OH, US)
- Jeffrey Arnold FEHRENBACH (Cincinnati, OH, US)
- Gary Michael Stanko (Cincinnati, OH, US)
- James GREEN (Evendale, OH, US)
Cpc classification
A46D1/0207
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
The present invention relates to a method for removing a coating from a defined area of a high pressure turbine part comprising the steps of: securing a guide to said turbine part, said guide both exposing said defined area while protecting adjacent areas; repeatedly inserting and withdrawing a brush through an opening in said guide which directs said brush to impinge said defined area and remove said coating. The invention also relates to a guide used in the aforementioned method.
Claims
1. A method for removing a coating from a defined area of a high pressure turbine part comprising the steps of: securing a guide to said turbine part, said guide both exposing said defined area while protecting adjacent areas; repeatedly inserting and withdrawing a brush through an opening in said guide which directs said brush to impinge said defined area and remove said coating.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said coating a corrosion-resistant coating.
3. The method of claim 2, comprising painting said corrosion-resistant coating onto said high pressure turbine to form the coating.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein said defined area is a dovetail slot.
5. The method of claim 4, comprising securing said guide in said dovetail slot by inserting and wedging said guide inside the dovetail slot containing the defined coating removal area.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein said guide comprises plastic or metal.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein said brush comprises stainless steel bristles.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein said bristles have a diameter between 1 and 3 mm.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein said bristles have a diameter of 2.5 mm.
10. The method of claim 7, wherein a defined length of said brush bristles impinge on said defined area.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein said defined length is 0.3 to 0.5 mm.
12. The method of claim 12, wherein said defined length is 0.38 mm.
13. The method of claim 1, comprising stroking the brush in and out through the guide at a rate of speed between 30 and 50 inches per minute.
14. The method of claim 14, wherein said brush is cylindrical and indexed by a controlled amount after every stroke.
15. The method of claim 15, wherein the brush is indexed by 36 degrees after each stroke.
16. The method of claim 2, wherein the corrosion-resistant coating is a ceramic coating.
17. The method of claim 1, wherein said high pressure turbine part is a rotor disk.
18. A guide for removing a coating from a surface of a dovetail joint of a rotor comprising: a contoured side surface adapted to interface with the teeth of a dovetail joint of a rotor; a top surface having a lip adapted to hold the guide in place against one side of the rotor and at least one hole positioned over a guide channel, wherein the guide channel includes at least one opening that exposes a surface of the dovetail joint when the guide is fitted to the rotor.
19. The guide of claim 18, wherein the side surface of the guide includes six cavities adapted to interface with the six teeth in the dovetail joint of the rotor and six guide channels corresponding to each tooth of the rotor.
20. The guide of claim 18, wherein the guide includes a cutout portion of the top surface.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0020] The method of the present invention is generally applicable to the removal of deposits from a defined area on a component, such as an anti-corrosion coating from a dovetail pressure face on turbine rotor disk in a jet engine. The process is particularly effective in removing anti corrosion coating deposited on an HPT disk, in which the coating is removed from a specifically defined area such as the pressure faces of the dovetail slots. This method is effective at maintaining close tolerances for the perimeter of the defined area without disturbing the remaining coating adjacent to the defined area.
[0021] The anti-corrosion coatings suitable for application to HPT's are generally known in the art. They generally include inorganic ceramic binders which permit the coatings to endure the extreme temperatures and environments that exist in stationary and aviation gas turbines. Commercially available coatings suitable for use in the present invention include ALSEAL 700 and ALSEAL 598 Tan, or similar paint-like materials.
[0022] As depicted in
[0023] An embodiment of the guide 3 is depicted in greater detail in
[0024] The guide also controls the degree of impingement and the defined area. The defined area, as discussed above, relates to that area from which it is desired to remove the coating, such as dovetail pressure faces. The guide 3 provides a physical covering over those areas of the surface where it is desired to retain the coating.
[0025] The guide 3 needs to be strong enough so as not to break down when exposed to the physical stresses of the reciprocating action of the brush strokes, as well as strong enough to maintain its integrity so as to protect those areas of a component, such as an HPT, to prevent coating removal. Generally both metals, as well as plastics, such as polycarbonates, have been found to be suitable in this regard, though other plastics could be employed. The guide can be manufactured by use of 3-d printing methods known in the art or by other methods. It will be appreciated that the geometry of the guide can be tailored to any surface of a component where it is desired to remove a selected portion of the coating thereof in accordance with the method of the present invention. The guide 3 is typically inserted and wedged securely into the piece to be treated, such as the dovetail slot 2 containing the coating removal area.
[0026] The brush 4 is depicted at
[0027] The bristles 8 can be made of any materials with suitable strength to withstand the reciprocating insertion and withdrawing from the orifices as well as suitably abrading qualities to remove coating from the device upon impingement with that coating. The material also needs to have suitable flexibility so that the bristles can bend in the orifice as they impinge on the selected area for the coating removal. Persons skilled in the art will understand how to choose metals with sufficient strength and flexibility to provide suitable abrading of a surface in the context of the present invention. A particularly preferred metal for the process is stainless steel for both the bristles and the central shaft.
[0028] As depicted in
[0029] In a preferred embodiment, the method tracks the stroke cycles to provide the proper number of strokes per coating removal area to completely remove the coating from the area. The method also preferably tracks the brush usage to a predetermined brush life cycle. For example, the method advantageously employs as a control a CNC machine such as a standard CNC milling machine. The method also works manually, though a more automated method is preferred.
[0030] By virtue of the method of the present invention, the integrity of the surrounding adjacent coating, as evidenced by highly magnified metal, is maintained [Any illustration of this we could include in the application?]. On the other hand, the method effectively removes all or substantially all of the coating from selected areas.
EXAMPLE
[0031] A guide was designed by use of a CNC machine to fit into the dovetail joints on a turbine rotor disk as depicted in
[0032] This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.