Rotor blade of a wind turbine and method for designing same

Abstract

A two-part or multi-part rotor blade and also to a method which is associated with it. The rotor blade is split into at least one rotor blade component which is close to the hub and one rotor blade component which is remote from the hub at a separation point in the longitudinal direction, wherein the rotor blade component which is close to the hub and the rotor blade component which is remote from the hub can be connected at the separation point for operation of the wind turbine. A ratio of profile thickness to profile depth, called relative thickness, at the separation point lies within a range of from 0.4 to 0.5. An improved two-part or multi-part rotor blade in spite of the unexpectedly high relative thicknesses.

Claims

1. A rotor blade of a wind turbine, comprising: a first rotor blade component that is close to a hub when mounted on a wind turbine, and a second rotor blade component that is remote from the hub, wherein the first and second rotor blade components are separable at a separation point in a longitudinal direction of the rotor blade, wherein a ratio of a profile thickness to a profile depth, called relative thickness, at the separation point is within a range from 0.4 to 0.5, wherein a sum of lengths of the first rotor blade component and the second rotor blade component provides a total blade length of the rotor blade, and wherein the separation point is located in a region from 25% to 38% of the total blade length as referenced from the hub.

2. The rotor blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein an absolute thickness of the rotor blade at the separation point is at least 1.7 meters.

3. The rotor blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein a mean relative thickness between a first position of a relative blade length and a second position of the relative blade length is defined as a ratio of a definite integral of the relative thickness from the first position to the second position to a distance between the first position and the second position, wherein the mean relative thickness from 20% to 30% of the relative blade length is at least 0.460.

4. The rotor blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein: a structural dimensionless parameter is defined as a definite integral of a relative thickness over a region of a relative blade length, wherein a lower limit of the integral is defined at a position of 20% of the total blade length and the structural dimensionless parameter is evaluated for any desired values of an upper limit, and the structural dimensionless parameter for an upper limit of 45% of the total blade length is at least 0.1.

5. The rotor blade as claimed in claim 4, wherein the structural dimensionless parameter for the upper limit of 45% of the blade length is at most 0.12.

6. A wind turbine comprising: a hub; and at least one rotor blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first rotor blade component of the at least one rotor blade is coupled to the hub.

7. A wind farm comprising a plurality of wind turbines as claimed in claim 6.

8. A method of forming a rotor blade of a wind turbine, the method comprising: coupling a first rotor blade component to a second rotor blade component at a connection point, wherein the first rotor blade component is close to a hub when the rotor blade is mounted to the wind turbine, wherein the second rotor blade component is remote from the hub, wherein the connection point is at a separation point in a longitudinal direction of the rotor blade, wherein a ratio of a profile thickness to a profile depth, called relative thickness, at the separation point is defined within a range of from 0.4 to 0.5, wherein a sum of lengths of the first rotor blade component and the second rotor blade component provides a total blade length of the rotor blade, and wherein the separation point is located in a region from 25% to 38% of the total blade length as referenced from the hub.

9. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein: a mean relative thickness between a first position of the relative blade length and a second position of a relative blade length is defined as a ratio of a definite integral of the relative thickness from the first position to the second position to a distance between the first position and the second position, and the mean relative thickness of from 20% to 30% of the relative blade length is at least 0.460.

10. The method as claimed in claim 8 wherein: a structural dimensionless parameter is defined as a definite integral of the relative thickness over a region of a relative blade length, wherein a lower limit of the integral is defined at a position of 20% of the total blade length and the structural dimensionless parameter is evaluated for any desired values of an upper limit, and the structural dimensionless parameter for an upper limit of 45% of the total blade length is at least 0.1.

11. The method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the structural dimensionless parameter for the upper limit of 45% of the total blade length is at most 0.12.

12. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the structural dimensionless parameter for an upper limit of 80% of the total blade length is at most 0.24.

13. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein a mean relative thickness from 20% to 50% of the relative blade length is at least 0.390.

14. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the ratio at the separation point is within a range from 0.42 to 0.46.

15. The rotor blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ratio at the separation point is within a range from 0.42 to 0.46.

16. The rotor blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein the separation point is located in a region from 27% to 33% of the total blade length.

17. The rotor blade as claimed in claim 3, wherein a mean relative thickness of from 20% to 50% of the relative blade length is at least 0.390.

18. The rotor blade as claimed in claim 4, wherein the structural dimensionless parameter for an upper limit of 80% of the total blade length is at least 0.2.

19. The rotor blade as claimed in claim 18, wherein the structural dimensionless parameter for the upper limit of 80% is at most 0.24.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) Further advantages and preferred refinements will be described more precisely below with reference to the exemplary embodiments of the appended figures, in which:

(2) FIG. 1 shows, schematically and by way of example, a wind turbine,

(3) FIG. 2 shows, schematically and by way of example, curves of relative blade thicknesses of rotor blades,

(4) FIG. 3 shows, schematically and by way of example, curves of a structural dimensionless parameter over the blade length, which is standardized with the maximum rotor blade length, of rotor blades, and

(5) FIG. 4 shows, schematically and by way of example, curves of a mean relative thickness over the blade length, which is standardized with the maximum rotor blade length, of rotor blades.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(6) FIG. 1 shows a wind turbine 100 comprising a tower 102 and a nacelle 104. A rotor 106 with three rotor blades 108 and a spinner 110 is arranged on the nacelle 104. During operation, the rotor 106 is set in rotary motion by the wind and thereby drives a generator in the nacelle 104. The spinner 110 encases a rotor hub (not shown) of the rotor 106.

(7) The rotor blades 108 are each split into two and have a separation point 109 which separates a rotor blade component which is close to the hub from a rotor blade component which is remote from the hub. In other examples, rotor blades 108 which are split into more than two, for example, which are split into three or which are split into four, and have more than one separation point are equally conceivable.

(8) Split rotor blades 108 are easier to transport than unsplit rotor blades 108 and furthermore also provide advantages with respect to production, for example, by using winding techniques. However, one known disadvantage of split rotor blades 108 is the generally higher blade mass than the unsplit rotor blades 108 of similar dimensions. The shown rotor blades 108, which are split into two, accordingly generally lead to higher loads on the wind turbine 100.

(9) For assembly purposes, the rotor blade component, which is close to the hub and the rotor blade component, which is remote from the hub are, for example, screwed together at the separation point 109 on the inside of the blade at the site of erection. In order that this can be ensured by a fitter, the thickness of the rotor blade 108 at the separation point 109 is, for example, at least 1.70 m. Other connection concepts can accordingly be provided given smaller thicknesses at the separation point 109.

(10) For optimum distribution of the loads, the separation point 109 would have a cylindrical profile with a relative thickness in the region of 1. However, since the separation point 109 lies in a region of the rotor blade 108, in particular in a region of from 25 to 38% of the blade length, at which considerable effects on the yield can already be detected, profiling should be performed. Accordingly, for aerodynamic reasons, the relative thickness of the profiling at the separation point 109, that is to say the ratio of blade thickness to blade depth at the separation point 109, should be as low as possible. However, a low relative thickness in the region of the separation point 109 would, as directly follows from the definition of the relative blade thickness, lead to high blade depths at the separation point 109, which would in turn have a disadvantageous effect both on turbine loads and on the transportation of the rotor blades 108.

(11) It has been found to be particularly preferable to define the separation point at a relative thickness in the range of from 0.4 to 0.5, in particular of from 0.42 to 0.46. This allows a rotor blade to be obtained which takes into account both the loads to be expected and the aerodynamic efficiency but also the mass of the rotor blade 108 as a whole in an appropriate manner.

(12) In comparison to one-part rotor blades, this results, in particular owing to the separation point 109, in relatively high thicknesses in that region of the rotor blade 108 which is close to the hub.

(13) FIG. 2 shows, schematically and by way of example, a curve 210 of the relative blade thickness of a rotor blade 108 which is split into two. For comparison, the same figure illustrates a curve 220 of the relative blade thickness of a known one-part rotor blade as a line. It can be seen that the relative thickness curve 210 lies above the relative thickness curve 220 over a wide course of the rotor blade length. This means that the rotor blade 108 which is split into two has a higher relative thickness than known rotor blades over a wide course in order to keep the mass of the outer blade low and thereby to compensate for the high mass of the inner blade, including the separation point 109, as far as possible and to keep the total mass of the rotor blade 108 in respect of the turbine loads as low as possible.

(14) A region of the separation point 109 is indicated by an arrow 230. In the region of the rotor hub, which region is identified by an arrow 240, the known thickness curve 220 has a circular-cylindrical profile which can be established from the relative thickness of 1. Further profile curves 220, which do not have a circular-cylindrical shape in the hub region 240, are likewise known. However, in comparison to the rotor blade 108, all of the known rotor blades and, respectively, their thickness curves 220 have, in the region of the separation point 230, that is to say particularly between 25% and 38% of the rotor blade length, relative thicknesses which lie considerably below the thickness curve 210.

(15) In FIG. 2 and also further FIGS. 3 and 4, the standardized rotor blade radius, that is to say a position in the longitudinal direction of the rotor blade starting from the hub, which position has been standardized with the length of the rotor blade, is plotted on the horizontal axis.

(16) Therefore, balancing out the aerodynamically critical profiles with high relative thicknesses in relation to the structurally advantageous thickness profiles is achieved. This is particularly difficult owing to the separation point 109, in particular in the case of rotor blades 108 which are split into two or more parts. To achieve this, provided is a dimensionless parameter F which corresponds substantially to an integral of the relative thickness:

(17) $F=\underset{x1}{\overset{x2}{\int }}\frac{d}{t}dx$

(18) Here, d is the thickness of the rotor blade 108 at a relative position

(19) $x=\frac{r}{R}$
and t is the local profile depth at the point x.

(20) The curve of the dimensionless parameter F is schematically shown for several different rotor blades in FIG. 3. Here, the value 0.2 has proven particularly advantageous as the lower integral limit x.sub.1. Here, a curve 310 of the dimensionless parameter F corresponds to the curve which is calculated for a rotor blade 108, while a curve 320 corresponds to a comparison curve of a known one-part rotor blade. It can be seen that the dimensionless parameter F for the rotor blade 108 assumes a higher value than is the case for the known one-part rotor blades. It should be noted that only relative variables which are not provided with units are then used for calculating the dimensionless parameter. It goes without saying that other dimensionless parameters which take into account the characteristic curve of the rotor blades 108 can also be used as an alternative.

(21) A further example is shown in FIG. 4 in which the mean relative thickness for various rotor blades is plotted with respect to the relative blade position. Here, a curve 410 likewise corresponds to an exemplary curve of the mean relative thickness of a rotor blade 108, while a curve 420 represents a known, one-part rotor blade by way of example. The mean relative thickness of the rotor blade lies considerably above the curve 420 of the known rotor blades over the entire plotted region. In other words, the curve 410 is always higher than the curve 420 of the known one-part rotor blade designs in the middle region of the blade between 0.2 and 0.8 of the relative blade length.

(22) In this example, the mean relative blade thickness for the region starting from 0.2 of the relative blade radius is determined. That is to say, the range of from 0.2 up to the value which is plotted on the horizontal is determined. For calculation purposes, for example, the dimensionless parameter F can be formed with the lower limit x.sub.1=0.2 and the result can be divided by the distance of the examined value from 0.2. It goes without saying that other ranges which do not necessarily begin at 0.2 can also be used for assessing the mean relative thickness. Therefore, for example, a range from 0.1 or else from 0.3 of the relative blade radius can also be examined.