SOLID COMPOSITION FOR AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY USE
20220030877 · 2022-02-03
Inventors
- Nemecio GONZALEZ FERNANDEZ (Camagüey, CU)
- Rolando MORÁN VALDIVIA (Camagüey, CU)
- Carlos PEREZ HEREDIA (Camagüey, CU)
- Yunier PANEQUE DIAZ (Camagüey, CU)
- Idania WONG PADILLA (Camagüey, CU)
- Ileana SÁNCHEZ ORTIZ (Camagüey, CU)
- Néstor MORA GONZÁLEZ (Camagüey, CU)
- Ramón FRANCO RODRÍGUEZ (Camagüey, CU)
- Danalay SOMONTES SANCHEZ (Camagüey, CU)
- Jesús MENA CAMPOS (La Habana, CU)
- Sonia GONZALEZ BLANCO (La Habana, CU)
Cpc classification
A01N63/20
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
Solid composition for agricultural or veterinary use comprising a mixture of bacterial concentrate of the strain C-924 and a commercially available culture medium or organic amendment, an antifoaming substance, sucrose, and having less than 12% residual moisture. The components of the formulation allow an adequate wettability of the solid final product, and its prolonged stability at storage temperature of 2 to 8° C. The invention discloses the use of the solid composition in the control of pathogens of plants and animals, and in the stimulation of seed germination and plant growth.
Claims
1. A solid composition for agricultural or veterinary use comprising i) up to 92.4% of a mixture of a bacterial concentrate of strain C-924 and a culture medium for the growth and development of microorganisms or a commercially available organic amendment; ii) from 1.8% to 6.6% of an antifoam substance; iii) from 0.8% to 3% of sucrose and iv) less than 12% of residual moisture, wherein the bacteria is in an amount between 10.sup.10 colony-forming units (cfu) and 10.sup.12 cfu per gram of solid composition.
2. The composition according to claim 1 wherein the antifoam substance is a mixture of fatty acid esters with copolymers of ethylene oxide-propylene oxide.
3. The composition according to claim 2 wherein the antifoam substance is of the Glanapon type.
4. The composition according to claim 1 wherein the culture medium is selected from the group consisting of yeast extract, casein hydrolysate, peptone and tryptone.
5. The composition according to claim 1 wherein the commercially available organic amendment is protein hydrolysate or molasses.
6.-11. (canceled)
12. A method for the control of plant and animal pathogens, said method comprising administering an effective amount of the solid composition of claim 1 to a plant or animal in need thereof by an appropriate form of application of the composition to said plant or animal.
13. A method for the stimulation of seed germination and plant growth, said method comprising administering an effective amount of the solid composition of claim 1 to the seeds or plants, by an appropriate form of application of the composition to said seeds or plants.
14. The method according to claim 12 wherein the pathogen is a parasitic nematode.
15. The method according to claim 14 wherein the parasitic nematode belongs to the genera Meloidogyne, Radopholus, Pratylenchus, Haemonchus, Trichostrongylus and Dictiocaulus.
16. The method according to claim 12 wherein the pathogen is a fungus.
17. The method according to claim 16 wherein the fungus is selected from the group consisting of Alternaria tabacina, Alternaria longipes, Bipolaris oryzae, Collectotrichum gloeosporioides, Fusarium oxysporum, Pestalotia palmarum, Rhizopus stolonifer, Rhizoctonia solani, Sarocladium oryzae and Thielaviopsis paradoxa.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
EXAMPLES
Example 1. Production of the Biomass
[0028] The biomass of the bacterial strain C-924, whose deposit number is CBS 613.95, was obtained by submerged fermentation in a batch system, in culture medium with the following composition: Yeast extract, 59 g/L; Sucrose, 170 g/L; Magnesium sulphate heptahydrate, 4.8 g/L and anti-foam Glanapon DG-158 1 g/L. The fermentation was carried out in a fermenter of 50 L of working volume, at 36° C., with an agitation of 500 rpm, an aeration of 1.5 liters of air per liter of culture medium, and a pressure in the glass of the fermenter of 1 bar. The culture was maintained for 72 hours, until the total sucrose added was consumed, and subsequently it was left in stationary phase for at least four hours. The microorganism was harvested by centrifugation in a tubular centrifuge, removing the culture supernatant. The biomass obtained was used in the formulation of the cream, or bacterial concentrate, to be dried. In
Example 2. Selection of Additives to Improve the Wettability of the Composition
[0029] An evaluation of the incidence of different additives in the physical properties of the formulation of the bacterial strain C-924, measured through wettability, was made. The biomass was obtained as described in Example 1. The additives evaluated were: acacia gum, xanthan gum, tragacanth gum, SDS, polysorbate 80 (tween 80), polysorbate 20 (tween 20), gelatin, sodium alginate, sucrose, ammonium sulphate, Glanapon DG-158 (Bussetti & Co, GmbH, Austria), Soy lecithin, Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), Polyethyleneglycol 600 (PEG 600) and Polyethyleneglycol 8000 (PEG 8000). Compositions with a concentration of the microorganism (bacterial strain C-924) between 8.4% and 9.2% (w/w) and culture medium (yeast extract) between 76% and 85% (w/w) were generated. The additives were added in two concentration levels, one minimum (2.3% (w/w)) and the other maximum (10.5% (w/w)), except for xanthan gum. For this compound, the minimum value was 0.23% and the maximum value was 1.2% (w/w); due the high viscosity that this additive gives to the cream or concentrate formulated to dry. As a control, a formulation without additives was used, with a composition of 9.5% (w/w) of biomass and 85.5% (w/w) of yeast extract. The formulated creams were dried in a spray dryer, preheating in line, by means of a heat exchanger at 37±1° C., and dried at an inlet temperature of 130±2° C., and an outlet temperature between 60° C. and 62° C. The obtained compositions were packed in three-layer material (Polyethylene, Aluminum and Polyester) by a vacuum sealer. The residual moisture of the compositions, after drying, averaged 5%. In response, the wettability of the compositions was evaluated, determined by the method described by the Collaborative International Pesticides Analytical Council (CIPAC) in CIPAC MT53.3.
[0030]
Example 3. Influence of Glanapon DG-158 Concentration on the Wettability of the Composition
[0031] To evaluate the influence of the concentration of Glanapon DG-158 on the wettability of the composition, two experiments were carried out, one in the presence and the other in the absence of organic matter, in addition, the concentration of anti-foaming agent Glanapon DG-158 was varied between 0 and 6.6%. The yeast extract was included in the formulation of the first experiment. This was done with a concentration of 23.5% of dry biomass, 67.1% of yeast extract, 1.1% of sucrose, and Glanapon DG-158 was between 0 and 6.6%. The composition of the second experiment did not include yeast extract, and had a concentration of 90.6% of dry biomass, 1.1% of sucrose, and Glanapon DG-158 between 0 and 6.6%. The biomass was obtained as described in Example 1. The drying process was carried out as described in Example 2, using an outlet temperature of 80° C. The response variable measured was wettability, according to the CIPAC MT53.3 technique. Table 1 shows the results obtained in the first experiment, where yeast extract was included in the formulation. The results obtained show that, from a Glanapon DG-158 concentration equal to or greater than 1.8% a wettability of less than 1 minute is achieved.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Effect of the concentration of Glanapon DG-158 on the wettability of the composition including yeast extract. Concentration of Glanapon DG-158 Wettability (%) (HH:MM:SS) 0.5 0:07:00 (b)* 1 0:16:12 (a) 1.8 0:00:22 (c) 3.5 0:00:20 (c) 5 0:00:19 (c) 6.6 0:00:18 (c) *Different letters represent statistically significant differences in wettability values (simple classification ANOVA, Student Newman Keuls test p <0.05). Wettability is expressed as wettability time, in hours:minutes:seconds (HH:MM:SS).
[0032] Table 2 shows the results obtained in the second experiment, where no yeast extract was included in the formulation. The collected results show that from a concentration of Glanapon DG-158 equal to or greater than 1.8% a wettability of less than 10 minutes is achieved.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Effect of the concentration of Glanapon DG-158 on the wettability of the composition without yeast extract. Concentration of Glanapon DG-158 Wettability (%) (HH:MM:SS) 0 1:40:00 (a)* 1 0:15:00 (b) 1.8 0:07:48 (c) 2.5 0:02:09 (d) 3 0:00:36 (e) 4 0:00:24 (e) 5 0:00:12 (e) 6.6 0:00:09 (e) *Different letters represent statistically significant differences in wettability values (simple classification ANOVA, Student Newman Keuls test p <0.05). Wettability is expressed as wettability time, in hours:minutes:seconds (HH:MM:SS).
[0033] The results obtained in both tables show that a Glanapon DG-158 concentration equal to or greater than 1.8% reduces the wettability time below 10 minutes, this time is shorter when the yeast extract is present in the formulation. When compositions with a concentration of Glanapon DG-158 greater than 6.6% are prepared a decrease in the fluidity of the powder obtained was appreciated, this is detrimental to the physical properties of the product.
Example 4. Influence of the Sucrose Concentration on the Wettability of the Solid Composition
[0034] The influence of the sucrose concentration on the wettability of the product was evaluated. Different variants of cream to be dried were prepared, with a base composition of 23.5% of dry biomass, 2% of Glanapon DG-158, 67% of yeast extract, sucrose between 0 and 3.3%. The biomass was obtained as described in Example 1. The creams were prepared at a total solid concentration of 40%. Drying was carried out in a spray dryer, with an inlet temperature of 130±2° C., and an outlet temperature of 80° C. The response variable measured was wettability, according to the CIPAC MT53.3 technique.
[0035]
Example 5. Preparation of Compositions for Biological Activity Assays
[0036] The cream to be dried, containing bacteria of strain C-924, was prepared at a total solid concentration equal to 30%. The yeast extract and the sucrose were first added to the creams, in the quantities required for each formulation to be prepared, and 15% of the total volume of Glanapon DG-158 to be used in each formulation, in a volume of process water that made possible the addition of the obtained wet biomass. The obtained mixtures were homogenized in a stirred tank with temperature control. They were heated at 95° C. for one hour. Subsequently, they were cooled to a temperature below 15° C. When said temperature was reached, the wet biomass obtained and the rest of the Glanapon DG-158 were added to each formulation, and it was kept under stirring for at least one hour.
[0037] The mixtures obtained were dried in a spray dryer. For this, the mixture to be dried was pre-heated in line, by means of a heat exchanger at 37±1° C., and dried at an air inlet temperature of 130±2° C. and an outlet temperature of 80° C. The place where the product was unloaded had a relative humidity less than 55% and a temperature between 22° C. and 26° C. The obtained compositions were packed in three-layer material (Polyethylene, Aluminum, Polyester), in a vacuum sealer.
[0038] The final compositions of the prepared formulations were:
[0039] Formulation 1: Control without microorganism. Dry biomass 0%; Yeast extract 90.4%, Sucrose 1.4%, Glanapon DG-158 3.2%.
[0040] Formulation 2: Dry biomass 2.3%; Yeast extract 88.2%, Sucrose 1.4%, Glanapon DG-158 3.2%.
[0041] Formulation 3: Dry biomass 4.5%; Yeast extract 85.9%, Sucrose 1.4%, Glanapon DG-158 3.2%.
[0042] Formulation 4: Dry biomass 22.6%; Yeast extract 67.8%, Sucrose 1.4%, Glanapon DG-158 3.2%.
[0043] Formulation 5: Dry biomass 45.2%; Yeast extract 45.2%, Sucrose 1.4%, Glanapon DG-158 3.2%.
[0044] Formulation 6: Dry biomass 90.4%; Yeast Extract 0%, Sucrose 1.4%, Glanapon DG-158 3.2%.
[0045] Residual moisture was always 5%. The compositions obtained fulfilled the following concentration ranges of each component: mixture of Yeast Extract and dry biomass less than or equal to 92.4%; Glanapon DG-158 between 1.8% and 6.6%; sucrose between 0.8% and 3%; water (residual moisture) below 12%. The microorganism used, consisting of the bacterial strain C-924, was in a concentration between 10.sup.10 and 10.sup.12 cfu/gram of composition.
Example 6. In Vitro Evaluation of the Nematicidal Effect of Compositions of the Microbial Strain C-924
[0046] A procedure was carried out at the laboratory level, to evaluate the nematicidal effect of compositions containing strain C-924, where the ratio organic matter/microorganism was variable. Yeast extract was used as organic matter. The compositions employed in this experiment are those described in Example 5. As an in vitro activity criterion, the inhibition of egg hatching and mortality of juveniles for each of the compositions was evaluated. This evaluation was carried out on different nematode species.
[0047] The specimens were extracted from the roots of plants infested with phytonematodes (Meloidogyne incognita, Radopholus similis and Pratylencus coffeae); from abomasum of ruminants (Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongilus colubriformis) and from lungs of sheep (Dictyocaulus viviparus) infested with zoonematodes. The specimens were placed in 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 3 minutes, and then washed 3 or 4 times with sterile deionized water to remove the remains of the hypochlorite. Juveniles were obtained from eggs incubated at 28° C. in sterile deionized water for 2 to 6 days. The samples were prepared shortly before developing the trials, which were performed in sterile culture plates of 24 wells. Hundred eggs (or 100 juveniles) were placed on average per well.
[0048] To know the effect of each composition of strain C-924, in all cases they were suspended initially in deionized water, the bacteria were harvested by centrifugation, washed and suspended in water—1% peptone, until reaching a cell density of 5×10.sup.4 cfu/well.
[0049] Once the eggs were placed, the plates were observed under a microscope and the possible presence of juveniles was verified in each well. To each well, a volume of 0.1 ml of each formulation was added and the volume was completed up to 1 ml with sterile deionized water. The controls were placed on a separate plate. These contained the same number of eggs or juveniles, in water—peptone only. Three replicas were placed in each case.
[0050] In the activity test on eggs; the evaluation was carried out at 96 hours, counting the juveniles emerged during this time in each well, under the microscope. The percentage of egg hatching was calculated having into account the total number of eggs placed at the beginning of the test, and the percentage of hatching inhibition of each treatment was determined regarding the hatching percentage of composition 1, used as a control.
[0051] In the activity test on juveniles; the evaluation was made after 72 hours of incubation. Subsequently, the juveniles were transferred to sterile deionized water and incubated for further 24 hours, before performing the final count of the number of live and dead juveniles, under the microscope. In this test the survival of the juveniles was calculated after the end of the test, and the reduction thereof was determined, regarding the one caused by the control formulation.
[0052] In both trials, the criterion for selecting the most effective compositions was the increase in the inhibition of egg hatching, and the reduction of juvenile survival by 50% or more. The results of the evaluation of the inhibition of egg hatching are shown in Table 3. The values represent the average of three replicas.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Inhibition of the hatching of nematode eggs by different compositions of the microbial strain 0-924. Composition Nematode species 1 2 3 4 5 6 Haemonchus 2.8% 27% 63.2% 99% 95% 84.8% contortus (a) * (b) (c) (e) (e) (d) Trichostrongilus 13.1% 45.4% 68% 98.5% 93% 81.5% colubriformis (a) (b) (c) (e) (e) (d) Dictyocaulus 37.3% 50.1% 74.2% 97.6% 96.2% 95% viviparus (a) (b) (c) (d) (d) (d) Meloidogyne 2.6% 39.9% 78% 99.2% 98.7% 96.2% incognita (a) (b) (c) (d) (d) (d) Radopholus 4.1% 47% 75.5% 98.7% 96% 93.2% similis (a) (b) (c) (e) (e) (d) Pratylencus 10% 41.2% 70.2% 99.5% 97.5% 95.5% coffeae (a) (b) (c) (e) (d) (d) * Values with different letters represent statistically significant differences (simple classification ANOVA, Student Newman Keuls test p <0.05)
[0053] For inhibition of egg hatching, compositions 3, 4, 5 and 6 demonstrated control above 50%, both for zoonematodes and for phytonematodes. The best results were obtained with composition 4. On the other hand, the results of the evaluation of juvenile mortality are shown in Table 4.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Mortality of juveniles caused by different compositions of strain 0-924. Composition Nematode species 1 2 3 4 5 6 Haemonchus 7.9% 22.5% 58.7% 84.7% 69.9% 67% contortus (a)* (b) (c) (e) (d) (d) Trichostrongilus 17.5% 26.8% 60.7% 88.1% 71.2% 57.8% colubriformis (a) (b) (c) (d) (c, d) (c) Dictyocaulus 22.8% 33.7% 54.9% 91.5% 77.5% 60.4% viviparus (a) (b) (c) (e) (d) (c) Meloidogyne 8.5% 35.2% 67.4% 98.2% 79% 62.3% incognita (a) (b) (c) (e) (d) (c) Radopholus 6.3% 25.8% 65% 90.8% 74.3% 60% similis (a) (b) (c) (e) (d) (c) Pratylencus 10.2% 30% 61.9% 88.1% 71.2% 59.6% coffeae (a) (b) (c) (e) (c, d) (c) *Values with different letters represent statistically significant differences (simple classification ANOVA, Student Newman Keuls test p <0.05)
[0054] For juvenile mortality, also compositions 3, 4, 5 and 6 fulfilled the criterion of causing more than 50% of dead juveniles. In this case, composition 4 was the one that showed the greatest effectiveness.
Example 7. In Vivo Evaluation of the Nematicidal Effect of Compositions of the Microbial Strain C-924
[0055] A) Pot Controlled Conditions
[0056] The nematicidal activity of the compositions, against Meloidogyne incognita, was determined under in vivo conditions (pots of 1 kg capacity). The compositions used in this experiment were those described in Example 5. Tomato plants of the variety UC 8213, susceptible to the attack of phytonematodes, were used. Fifty plants were used for each composition. A 1:1 mixture of sterile sand and peat was used as substrate, which was infested with an amount of 1000 nematode eggs per each pot, three days before the first application of the compositions. An amount of 6.25 g of each solid composition was weighed and suspended in 5 L of water. Hundred milliliters were applied per pot. In the treatments, the applications of the compositions were carried out three times. The first application was made seven days before the transplant of the seedlings, the second application was made 14 days after the transplant, and the third one was conducted 21 days after the second application.
[0057] Forty days after the seedlings were planted; the damage caused to the roots by attack of nematodes was evaluated, using the scale of infestation degrees of Bridge and Page (Tropical Pest Management Vol. 26, Iss. 3, 1980). The values of the infestation degree of the plants treated with each composition were compared statistically. The results obtained are shown in Table 5.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Infestation degree by attack of the nematode Meloidogyne incognita tomato plant roots. Treatment Infestation degree Composition 1 6.73 (a)* Composition 2 5.88 (a) Composition 3 3.53 (b) Composition 4 1.50 (d) Composition 5 1.76 (d) Composition 6 2.04 (c) *Values with different letters represent statistically significant differences (simple classification ANOVA, Student Newman Keuls test p <0.05)
[0058] According to the results obtained in the nematicidal activity test in pots, it was demonstrated that compositions 3, 4, 5 and 6 caused less damage by nematode attack in the roots, with statistically significant differences if compared to plants that received the other formulations. Plants treated with compositions 4 and 5 were those that showed highest levels of protection against attack by the pest.
[0059] B) Field Conditions
[0060] The nematicidal activity of the compositions under study was determined in conditions of a protected crop house of 0.1 ha. The initial infestation of the soil was evaluated, from random sampling and planting of indicator plants. A protected crop house with a high level of initial infestation, equal to or greater than 7 was selected, according to the results of the Bridge and Page scale. Plants of the tomato hybrid named 3019, susceptible to the attack of nematodes, were used. The compositions were applied following a random block design. Concentrated solutions of each composition were prepared, suspending 500 g of each composition in 50 L of water. From these suspensions, 1:8 dilutions were prepared before application in each block, and 100 mL were applied to the area where the transplant of each seedling would be performed in the first application. In the second and third application, between 200 mL and 300 mL of said dilution per plant were supplied, depending on the development of the plant. The application scheme was similar to that used in the trial under pot conditions: one application seven days before transplanting the seedlings on the furrow, the second application was made 14 days after the transplant, and the third one was 21 days after the second application. Root damage was evaluated in the total number of plants treated with each formulation, by the Bridge and Page scale, at 70 days of cultivation. The damage values were statistically compared. The harvest yield in each treatment was also evaluated, from the total weight of the fruits (at the end of the cultivation cycle, 125 days). The results obtained are shown in Table 6.
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Infestation degree in tomato plant roots attacked by the nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Treatment Infestation degree Yields (t/ha) Composition 1 9.2 (a)* 1.93 Composition 2 7.8 (b) 21.84 Composition 3 6.1 (c) 24.12 Composition 4 4.6 (d) 35.22 Composition 5 5.2 (c) 32.10 Composition 6 5.4 (c) 28.20 *Values with different letters represent statistically significant differences (simple classification ANOVA, Student Newman Keuls test p <0.05)
[0061] In the trial under field conditions, compositions 4, 5 and 6 exhibited the greatest control of damage by nematode attack. In the case of composition 4, the degree of infestation caused was 50% of the one caused in the plants that received the formulation 1. There is also coincidence between these results and those obtained in terms of yields, where composition 4 allowed obtaining 1725% more fruit than formulation 1, used as control.
Example 8. Assessment of the Activity of Compositions Containing the Bacterial Strain C-924 Against Phytopathogenic Fungi
[0062] An activity test against phytopathogenic fungi was carried out on Petri dishes with solid culture medium. Inoculation of the fungi was carried out when the medium was still liquid (temperature close to 40° C.). Once the medium was solidified, discs of filter paper, moistened in a suspension of 1 mg/mL of each composition, were placed in the center of each plate and incubated at 30° C. The compositions employed in this experiment are described in Example 5. Three Petri dishes were used for each treatment. After 5 days, the inhibition zones of each treatment were evaluated, and the values of those corresponding to the same composition by fungus type were averaged. The results obtained are shown in Table 7.
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Inhibition on phytopathogenic fungi by the compositions containing strain C-924. Inhibition halo (mm) Composition A B C D E F G H I J 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 1.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 3 12.5 10.5 2.5 2.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 6.0 4.0 4 19.0 20.0 15.0 15.0 15.5 15.5 14.5 18.0 15.5 14.0 5 17.0 15.0 14.0 14.5 13.5 13.0 12.5 16.5 14.5 13.5 6 18.0 18.0 15.0 13.5 13.5 15.5 13.0 17.0 15.0 13.0 A) Alternaria tabacina B) Alternaria longipes C) Bipolaris oryzae D) Collectotrichum gloeosporioides E) Fusarium oxysporum F) Pestalotia palmarum G) Rhizopus stolonifer H) Rhizoctonia solani I) Sarocladium oryzae J) Thielaviopsis paradoxa
[0063] With these results, the antagonistic activity of solid compositions containing the strain C-924, on all the phytopathogenic fungi that appear in Table 7, is demonstrated. In particular, compositions 4, 5 and 6 generated greater halos of growth inhibition on the phytopathogenic fungi.
Example 9. Demonstration of the Stability of the Composition with the Greatest Biological Activity
[0064] The satisfactory results obtained in the biological activity experiments led to a real-time stability study of eight lots manufactured with composition 4; consisting of 22.6% dry biomass; Yeast extract 67.8%; Sucrose 1.4%; Glanapon DG-158 3.2% and residual humidity of 5%. The outlet temperature of the spray dryer was 80° C. The batches were stored between 2° C. to 8° C. of temperature. The indicators of the stability of the batches were analyzed at the beginning and at different times of manufacture, until completing the 24 months of storage.
[0065] It was shown that the composition containing dry biomass 22.6%; yeast extract 67.8%; 1.4% sucrose; Glanapon DG-158 3.2%; and a residual humidity of 5% maintained a stability of at least 24 months in shelf, at a temperature between 2° C. and 8° C., which is observed in Table 8.
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Stability of batches at storage temperature between 2° C. and 8° C. Indicator 0 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months Viability count 16.9 ± 4.0 7.36 ± 0.60 4.48 ± 0.70 2.32 ± 0.70 1.48 ± 0.60 (×10.sup.11 cfu) Suspendibility (%) 100 100 100 99 99 Wettability 0:03:30 ± 0:05:03 ± 0:04:03 ± 0:04:35 ± 0:05:31 ± (HH:MM:SS) 0:00:48 0:00:42 0:00:54 0:00:48 0:00:55 Wettability is expressed as wettability time, in hours:minutes:seconds (HH:MM:SS).
Example 10. Demonstration of the Biofertilizing Capacity of the Composition with the Highest Biological Activity
[0066] To check the biofertilizing activity, in corn plants, of the solid composition of strain C-924 that showed the greatest effect against nematodes and fungi (formulation 4), soil inoculation was done seven days before and seven days after planting the seedlings. The wettable powder, resulting from the formulation, was suspended at a concentration of 10.sup.8 cfu/mL. The volume applied was 100 mL per pot. As a positive control, plants treated with the plant growth stimulating bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens C16 and Azotobacter chroococcum INIFAT 12 were used. As a negative control, non-inoculated plants were used. The number of replicas was 20 plants per treatment. The seeds were sown at the rate of one seed per nest, four nests per pot and at a depth of three centimeters, in pots of 1 dm.sup.3 of volume.
[0067] The bacteria P. fluorescens C16 (at a concentration of 2.7×10.sup.10 cfu/mL) and A. chroococcum INIFAT 12 (at a concentration of 4.5×10.sup.10 cfu/mL) were applied at the time of sowing. Both strains were used in a solid mixture of the bacterial solution with previously sieved humus, at a dose of 2 kg/ha.
[0068] Evaluated variables were: [0069] Percent of seeds germinated seven days after sowing. [0070] Height of the plants from the neck of the root to the leaf flag axils (in cm, measured 7 days and 35 days after planting of the plants). [0071] Diameter of the stem of the plants at 2 cm height of the stem (in mm).
[0072] As it can be seen in
[0073] For the variable “plant height”, the best results (with statistically significant differences) were obtained with the use of the solid composition containing C-924, which is observed in Table 9.
TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Height of inoculated corn plants. 7 dias 35 dias UNTREATED Control 11.73.sup.b 72.41.sup.c Composition with C-924 14.15.sup.a 83.40.sup.a A. chroococcum INIFAT 12 11.82.sup.b 76.53.sup.b P. fluorescens C16 13.03.sup.a 78.64.sup.b Standard error 0.667* 1.825* Different letters represent statistically significant differences for p <0.05 according to Tukey's multiple range test. The height of the plants (in cm) was measured at 7 and 35 days after planting of plants.
[0074] Regarding the diameter of the stem, during the first three weeks of the experiment, there were no differences between the plants, including the control (Table 10). After 28 days, it was found that in the variant where the solid composition of C-924 was present, the best values for this variable were obtained. These values were higher (with statistical significance) than those obtained in the control without inoculation, and in plants treated with the plant growth stimulating bacteria, used as a positive control, which were similar to each other.
TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Stem diameter of inoculated corn plants. 7 days 21 days 28 days 35 days control 2.46 4.54 7.0.sup.b 8.67.sup.b C-924 2.25 4.58 8.09.sup.a 10.52.sup.a A. chroococcum INIFAT 12 2.33 4.00 6.43.sup.b 8.85.sup.b P. fluorescens C16 2.33 4.31 6.61.sup.b 8.66.sup.b Standard error 0.132.sup.n.s. 0.245.sup.n.s. 0.311* 0.713* Different letters differ significantly from each other for p <0.05 according to Tukey's multiple range test. The diameter was measured at 7, 21, 28 and 35 days after planting.
[0075] With these results it is concluded that the composition containing C-924 has biofertilizing activity, by stimulating seed germination and growth, evaluated by the height and thickness of the stem of the plants.
Example 11. Evaluation of the Nematicidal Effect of Compositions of Strain C-924 with Several Microorganism Culture Media
[0076] The nematicidal activity, against Meloidogyne incognita, of compositions similar to formulation 4 of Example 5 was determined in vivo. This composition 4 was chosen because it has the best results regarding nematicidal, fungicidal and growth-promoting activity. The similar compositions evaluated in this experiment comprised different culture media of microorganisms and were the following: [0077] Composition 4A (Control): Dry biomass 22.6%; Yeast Extract 67.8%, Sucrose 1.4%, Glanapon DG-158 3.2% [0078] Composition 4B: Dry biomass 22.6%; Casein hydrolysate 67.8%, Sucrose 1.4%, Glanapon DG-158 3.2% [0079] Composition 4C: Dry biomass 22.6%; Peptone 67.8%, Sucrose 1.4%, Glanapon DG-158 3.2% [0080] Composition 4D: Dry biomass 22.6%; Tryptone 67.8%, Sucrose 1.4%, Glanapon DG-158 3.2% [0081] Composition 4E (Control without microorganism): Dry biomass 0%; Yeast extract 90.4%, Sucrose 1.4%, Glanapon DG-158 3.2%
[0082] All the compositions had a residual moisture of 5%. Tomato plants of the variety UC 8213, susceptible to the attack of the phytonematodes, were used. Fifty plants were used for each composition. As a substrate, a 1:1 mixture of sterile sand and peat was used, which was infested with an amount of 1000 eggs per pot, three days before the first application of the compositions. An amount of 6.25 g of each of the solid compositions was weighed and suspended in 5 L of water. They were applied at a rate of 100 mL per pot. The applications of the compositions were made three times: the first at seven days before the transplant of the seedlings, the second at 14 days after the sowing, and the last application at 21 days after the second one. After 40 days of planting, the damage caused by attack of the nematodes to the roots was evaluated, using the scale of degrees of infestation of Bridge and Page. The values of the infestation gradology of the plants treated with each composition were statistically compared. The results obtained after 40 days of seedling planting are shown in Table 11.
TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Root infestation due to attack of nematodes in plants under pot conditions. Treatment Infestation degree Composition 4A 1.53 (b) Composition 4B 2.18 (b) Composition 4C 2.30 (b) Composition 4D 1.93 (b) Composition 4E 6.80 (a) Values with different letters represent statistically significant differences (simple classification ANOVA, Student Newman Keuls test p <0.05)
[0083] According to the results obtained in this nematicidal activity test in pots, it was demonstrated that the application of the compositions 4A, 4B, 4C and 4D resulted in a lower affectation by attack of nematodes in the roots, with statistically significant differences, if compared to the plants treated with the composition without the microorganism (4E). There were no differences in activity between the compositions of C-924 tested, regardless of the culture medium used.