Chemical flooding method for balanced displacement of heterogeneous oil reservoir

Abstract

A method for realizing balanced displacement of crude oil by injection and production optimization coordinated chemical flooding which comprises the following steps: determining the median size and elastic modulus of viscoelastic particles according to the average permeability of the reservoir; optimizing the concentration ratio of the total concentration of the chemical agent; the physical parameters of each layer are counted, and the hierarchical system is combined according to the entropy weight algorithm and the cluster analysis method based on the gravity center method; the optimal section slug volume ratio of the single well injected with two slugs under the heterogeneity of the permeability of the strata is calculated; and the objective function is established by combining the coefficient of variation of remaining oil saturation, the effect of chemical flooding and the cost, and the numerical simulator is used to optimize the objective function.

Claims

1. A chemical flooding method for balanced displacement of heterogeneous oil reservoir, including the following steps: (1) determining median size and elastic modulus of viscoelastic particles; (2) optimizing concentration ratio of three chemical agents; optimal concentration ratio of polymer, surfactant and viscoelastic particles is calculated according to chemical agent concentration corresponding to maximum oil increment per ton of agent; (3) combining development layers; (4) determining sectional slug volume ratio of chemical flooding; (5) optimizing well location, injection rate and production rate and chemical amount for single well; and (6) determining volume and concentration of sectional slug.

2. The chemical flooding method for balanced displacement of heterogeneous oil reservoir according to claim 1, wherein combination of development layers in Step (3) refer to: physical parameters of each layer passed by injection well are counted, including permeability, effective thickness, oil recovery factor and remaining geological reserves; weight of each physical parameter is determined according to the entropy weight algorithm, and the comprehensive evaluation index of each layer is calculated; cluster analysis method based on the center of gravity is used to merge the layers, and all the layers are combined into two layers.

3. The chemical flooding method for balanced displacement of heterogeneous oil reservoir according to claim 1, wherein the determination of median size and elastic modulus of viscoelastic particles in Step (1) refer to: according to the average permeability of the reservoir provided by the oilfield, the median size and elastic modulus of viscoelastic particles matched the target reservoir are calculated based on the matching relationship model between the median particle size and elastic modulus of viscoelastic particles and the average permeability of the reservoir; the calculation formulas are shown in formulas (I) and (II):
d=−49.8Ln(k)+513.6 (I)
E.sub.m=0.004(k).sup.1.03−1.241 (II) wherein k is the average permeability of the reservoir, 10.sup.−3μm.sup.2; d is the median size of viscoelastic particles matched the target reservoir, μm; E.sub.m is the elastic modulus of viscoelastic particles matched to the target reservoir, Pa; Ln( )is a logarithmic function.

4. The chemical flooding method for balanced displacement of heterogeneous oil reservoir according to claim 1, wherein optimization of concentration ratio of three chemical agents in Step (2) refer to: i) he concentrations of polymer, surfactant and viscoelastic particles are adjusted respectively under the condition of ensuring the total concentration of chemical agents constant, and no less than 15 groups of core flooding experiments are carried out; the injection volume and cumulative oil production of chemical agents in each group of core flooding experiments are counted, and the oil increment per ton of agent is calculated, as shown in formula (III): $\begin{matrix} R_{t} = \frac{Q_{o} - Q_{oi}}{(w_{p} + w_{s} + w_{g}) V} & (III) \end{matrix}$ wherein R.sub.i is the oil increment per ton of agent, m.sup.3/t; Q.sub.o is the cumulative oil production of chemical flooding, 10.sup.−6m.sup.3; Q.sub.oi is the cumulative oil production of water flooding, 10.sup.−6m.sup.3; w.sub.p is the concentration of polymer, kg/m.sup.3; w.sub.g is the concentration of surfactant, kg/m.sup.3; w.sub.g is the concentration of viscoelastic particles, kg/m.sup.3; V is the injection volume of chemical agent, 10.sup.−6.sub.m.sup.3; ii) the optimal concentration ratio of polymer, surfactant and viscoelastic particles is calculated as w.sub.p: w.sub.s: w.sub.g according to the injection concentration of agent used in the experiment corresponding to the maximum oil increment per ton of agent.

5. The chemical flooding method for balanced displacement of heterogeneous oil reservoir according to claim 2, wherein the cluster analysis method based on the gravity center method is adopted for layer combination includes the following steps: first, the Euclidean distance between the layers is calculated and the two layers with the shortest Euclidean distance are merged into a new layer; then, the Euclidean distance between the new layer and other layers is calculate. repeat this process, and finally combine all layers into two layers; by repeating this process, all layers are finally combined into two layers.

6. The chemical flooding method for balanced displacement of heterogeneous oil reservoir according to claim 1, wherein the determination of sectional slug volume ratio of chemical flooding in Step (4) refer to: i) the reservoir model with a well group composed of the two layers was established to conduct numerical simulation of two-slug chemical flooding; and the recovery factors with different permeability ratio and thickness ratios of high and low permeability layers are calculated to determine the optimal sectional slug volume ratios of chemical flooding; ii) the horizontal axis was taken as the product of the thickness ratio of the high and low permeability layers and the permeability ratio of step i), and the vertical axis was taken as the optimal sectional slug volume ratios of chemical flooding; a scatter plot was drawn, and the standard plate of the sectional slug volume ratios of chemical flooding was obtained through nonlinear regression; iii) the product of thickness ratio of high and low permeability layers and permeability ratio of each well is determined, and the optimal sectional slug volume ratios of chemical flooding d.sub.1:d.sub.2 are determined with the standard plate of the sectional slug volume ratios; the sectional slug volume ratios of chemical flooding d.sub.1:d.sub.2 refers to the ratio of the volume of chemical flooding slug 1 to the volume of chemical flooding slug 2 which adjacent to the chemical flooding slug 1.

7. The chemical flooding method for balanced displacement of heterogeneous oil reservoir according to claim 6, wherein the concrete implementation steps of step i) include refer to: firstly, a single well group reservoir model is intercepted from the target reservoir model, and models composed of the two layers with different permeability ratio and different thickness ratios of high and low permeability layers are established; then, for a certain model of permeability ratio and thickness ratio of high and low permeability layers, under the condition of the same total volume of chemical agents, the chemical flooding numerical simulator is used to calculate the recovery factors of different sectional slug volume ratios; finally, a scatter plot was drawn with the sectional slug volume ratio as the horizontal axis and the recovery factor as the vertical axis; the sectional slug volume ratios corresponding to the maximum recovery factor was obtained by fitting, that is, the optimal sectional slug volume ratio under the specified condition of the permeability ratio and the thickness ratio of the high and low permeability layers.

8. The chemical flooding method for balanced displacement of heterogeneous oil reservoir according to claim 1, wherein the optimization of well location, injection rate and production rate and chemical amount for single well in Step (5) refer to: considering remaining oil saturation variation coefficient which is the characterization of chemical flooding of equilibrium degree, the oil increase effect of the chemical flooding and chemical agents cost, the objective function of the injection-production optimization coordination chemical flooding achieve equilibrium displacement such as equation (IV) is determined as below: $\begin{matrix} Obj = \frac{(1 - S_{or} - {\overline{S}}_{o} (L, q_{i}, q_{p})}{(\begin{matrix} V_{r} (S_{o} (L, q_{i}, q_{p})) \\ (\begin{matrix} P_{P} \frac{w_{p}}{w_{p} + w_{s} + w_{g}} + \\ P_{S} \frac{w_{s}}{w_{p} + w_{s} + w_{g}} + \\ P_{g} \frac{w_{g}}{w_{p} + w_{s} + w_{g}} \end{matrix}) \end{matrix} {.Math.}_{i = 1}^{n} C_{Tc, i} V_{T, i}} & (IV) \end{matrix}$ in the equation (IV), Obj is the objective function of the injection-production optimization coordination chemical flooding achieve equilibrium displacement; L is the location coordinates of injectors and producers; q.sup.i is injection rate of each injector; q.sub.p is production rate of each producer; S.sub.or is remaining oil saturation, fraction; S.sub.o(L,q.sub.i,q.sub.p) is the average remaining oil saturation, fraction; S.sub.o(L,q.sub.i,q.sub.p) is remaining oil saturation, fraction; V.sub.r (S.sub.o) is the remaining oil saturation variation coefficient, fraction; C.sub.Tc,i is the total concentration of chemical agents injected into injector i, kg/m.sup.3; V.sub.T,i is the total volume of chemical agents injected into injector i, m.sup.3; P.sub.p is the price of polymer, yuan/kg; P.sub.S is the price of surfactant, yuan/m.sup.3; P.sub.g is the price of viscoelastic particle, yuan/kg; L,q.sub.i,q.sub.p are input into the chemical flooding numerical simulator to obtain S.sub.o(L,q.sub.i,q.sub.p). with the maximum of Obj is the goal, the location coordinates of injectors and producers L, total chemical agents concentration injected into injector i C.sub.Tc,i, chemical agents total injection volume of injector i V.sub.T,i, liquid production rate of producers q.sub.i and injection rate of injectors q.sub.p are adjustable variables; when the well location coordinates of injectors and producers, liquid production rate of producers and liquid injection rate of injectors change, the average variation coefficient of residual oil saturation and remaining oil saturation calculated by the chemical flooding numerical simulation are also change, which affects the value of the objective function; chemical flooding numerical simulator is used to calculate Obj with combination of different value of adjustable variables, and the corresponding adjustable variable is the optimal value of each adjustable variable when Obj achieves the maximum.

9. The chemical flooding method for balanced displacement of heterogeneous oil reservoir according to claim 1, wherein the determination of volume and concentration of sectional slug in Step (6) refer to: according to the total chemical agents concentration of injector i C.sub.Tc,i, chemical agents total injection volume of injector i V.sub.T,i, optimal concentration ratio of polymers, surfactants and viscoelastic particles w.sub.p: w.sub.s: w.sub.g and optimal sectional slug volume ratios of chemical flooding d.sub.1:d.sub.2, injection concentration of each chemical agent and sectional slug volume of chemical flooding are calculated; and the chemical concentration injected into injector i C.sub.l,i is shown in equation (V): $\begin{matrix} C_{l, i} = C_{Tc, i} \frac{w_{l}}{.Math. w_{l}} & (V) \end{matrix}$ in equation (V), l ∈{p,s,g}, w.sub.l is the optimum concentration of the chemical agents, p refer to polymer, s refer to surfactant, g refer to viscoelastic particle; the volume of jth chemical flooding slug injected into injector i is shown in the equation (VI): $\begin{matrix} V_{T, i, j} = V_{T, i} \frac{d_{j}}{.Math. d_{j}} & (VI) \end{matrix}$ in equation (VI), the value of j is 1 or 2, when j is 1, equation (VI) is the volume of first chemical flooding slug injected into injector. when j is 2, equation (VI) is the volume of second chemical flooding slug injected into injector.

10. The chemical flooding method for balanced displacement of heterogeneous oil reservoir according to claim 4, its characteristic is that there is no less than 15 groups of core flooding experiments are carried out.

Description

ATTACHED DRAWINGS

[0057] FIG. 1 is schematic diagram of the process of the method for realizing balanced displacement of crude oil by injection and production optimization coordinated chemical flooding;

[0058] FIG. 2 is schematic diagram of optimization results of slug volume ratios;

[0059] FIG. 3 is schematic diagram of well location;

[0060] FIG. 4 is schematic diagram of oil recovery factor curve.

SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION

[0061] The invention is further limited by the following illustration and implementation example, but not limited to this.

EXAMPLE 1

[0062] (1) Determination of Median Size and Elastic Modulus of Viscoelastic Particles

[0063] The median particle size and elastic modulus of viscoelastic particles are matched with reservoir permeability. Through the known reservoir permeability, the median size and elastic modulus matching the reservoir permeability characteristics can be calculated. Then the viscoelastic particles whose particle size median and elastic modulus meet the calculation results are determined for subsequent chemical flooding.

[0064] (2) Optimization of Concentration Ratio of Three Chemical Agents

[0065] The optimal concentration ratio of polymer, surfactant and viscoelastic particles is calculated according to the chemical agent concentration corresponding to the maximum oil increment per ton of agent.

[0066] (3) Combination of Development Layers

[0067] The physical parameters of each layer passed by injection well are counted, including permeability, effective thickness, oil recovery factor and remaining geological reserves. The weight of each physical parameter is determined according to the entropy weight algorithm, and the comprehensive evaluation index of each layer is calculated.

[0068] The cluster analysis method based on the center of gravity is used to merge the layers, and all the layers are combined into two layers.

[0069] (4) Determination of Sectional Slug Volume Ratio of Chemical Flooding

[0070] (5) Optimization of Well Location, Injection Rate and Production Rate and Chemical Amount for Single Well

[0071] (6) Determination of Volume and Concentration of Sectional Slug

EXAMPLE 2

[0072] According to the method for realizing balanced displacement of crude oil by injection and production optimization coordinated chemical flooding described in Example 1, the difference is as follows:

[0073] The determination of median size and elastic modulus of viscoelastic particles in step (1) includes the following steps:

[0074] The average permeability of a reservoir is 856×10.sup.−3 μm.sup.2. The median size and elastic modulus of viscoelastic particles matched the target reservoir are calculated based on the matching relationship model between the median particle size and elastic modulus of viscoelastic particles and the average permeability of the reservoir. The calculation formulas are shown in formulas (I) and (II):

d=−49.8Ln(k)+513.6 (I)

E.sub.m=0.004(k).sup.1.03−1.241 (II)

[0075] Where k is the average permeability of the reservoir, 10.sup.−3μm.sup.2; d is the median size of viscoelastic particles matched the target reservoir, μm; E.sub.m is the elastic modulus of viscoelastic particles matched to the target reservoir, Pa; Ln( )is a logarithmic function. According to formula (I) and (II), the median size of viscoelastic particles matching the permeability of the reservoir is calculated as 177.34 μm, and the elastic modulus is 2.95Pa.

[0076] The optimization of concentration ratio of three chemical agents in step (2) includes the following steps: [0077] {circle around (1)} Based on the core flooding experiment, the concentrations of polymer, surfactant and viscoelastic particles are adjusted respectively under the condition of ensuring the total concentration of chemical agents constant, and 16 groups of core flooding experiments are carried out. The injection volume and cumulative oil production of chemical agents in each group of core flooding experiments are counted, and the oil increment per ton of agent is calculated, as shown in formula (III):

[00005] $\begin{matrix} R_{t} = \frac{Q_{o} - Q_{oi}}{(w_{p} + w_{s} + w_{g}) V} & (III) \end{matrix}$

[0078] Where R.sub.t is the oil increment per ton of agent, m.sup.3/t; Q.sub.o is the cumulative oil production of chemical flooding, 10.sup.−6m.sup.3; Q.sub.oi is the cumulative oil production of water flooding, 10.sup.−6m.sup.3; w.sub.p is the concentration of polymer, kg/m.sup.3; w.sub.g is the concentration of surfactant, kg/m.sup.3; w.sub.g is the concentration of viscoelastic particles, kg/m.sup.3; V is the injection volume of chemical agent, 10.sup.−6m.sup.3.

[0079] {circle around (2)} The optimal concentration ratio of polymer, surfactant and viscoelastic particles is calculated as w.sub.p: w.sub.s: w.sub.gaccording to the injection concentration of agent used in the experiment corresponding to the maximum oil increment per ton of agent.

[0080] In this example, the total chemical concentration is 4 kg/m.sup.3 and the injection volume is 240×10.sup.−6m.sup.3. The maximum oil increment per ton of agent is 51.11m.sup.3/t, and the corresponding water flooding oil production is 37.8×10.sup.−6m.sup.3. The cumulative oil production of chemical flooding is 74.6×10.sup.−6m.sup.3, the oil increment is 36.8×10.sup.−6m.sup.3, and the concentration ratio of polymer, surfactant and viscoelastic particles is 1:2:1.

[0081] The combination of development layers in step (3) includes the following steps:

[0082] The permeability, effective thickness, degree of reserve recovery and remaining geological reserves of each layer in a well group of a reservoir are shown in table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Degree Remaining Effective of reserve geological Comprehensive Permeability/ thickness/ recovery/ reserves/ evaluation Layer (10.sup.−3 μm.sup.2) m % (10.sup.4 m.sup.3) index 1 72.9 1.0245 3.96 3.17 0.01057 2 411.9 1.0279 7.43 4.48 0.02670 3 1008.1 1.0269 17.28 6.17 0.05120 4 774.8 1.0269 33.01 6.51 0.05396 5 927.6 1.0273 48.05 4.78 0.05047 6 1489.5 1.0270 54.90 3.18 0.05269 7 917 1.1609 45.90 3.32 0.06211 8 1734.3 1.4937 36.74 5.40 0.14263 9 1667.3 1.4881 40.71 3.84 0.13184 10 848.6 1.4857 57.57 2.41 0.11262 11 166.6 1.4856 61.63 1.50 0.09568 12 669.7 1.4762 57.02 2.27 0.10672 13 442.6 1.4765 59.15 2.19 0.10282

[0083] Firstly, the weights of permeability, effective thickness, recovery degree and residual geological reserves can be calculated as 0.1858, 0.48, 0.1462 and 0.1879 respectively according to the entropy weight algorithm. Then, the comprehensive evaluation indexes of each layer can be calculated based on it, as shown in Table 1.

[0084] The cluster analysis method based on the center of gravity is used to merge the layers, and all the layers are combined into two layers. First, the Euclidean distance between the layers is calculated and the two layers with the shortest Euclidean distance are merged into a new layer. Then, the Euclidean distance between the new layer and other layers is calculate. repeat this process, and finally combine all layers into two layers. By repeating this process, all layers are finally combined into two layers. Dividing the reservoir into two layers can effectively reflect the rhythm and vertical heterogeneity, and the permeability gradient and thickness of each layer are in the range of multi-slug chemical flooding. Therefore, the reservoir is divided into two layers. The first layer includes 1-7 layers, and the second layer includes 8-13.

[0085] The determination of sectional slug volume ratio of chemical flooding in step (4) includes the following steps:

[0086] {circle around (1)} The reservoir model with a well group composed of the two layers was established to conduct numerical simulation of two-slug chemical flooding. And the recovery factors with different permeability ratio and thickness ratios of high and low permeability layers are calculated to determine the optimal sectional slug volume ratios of chemical flooding. The concrete implementation steps include:

[0087] Firstly, a single well group reservoir model is intercepted from the target reservoir model, and models composed of the two layers with different permeability ratio and different thickness ratios of high and low permeability layers are established.

[0088] Then, for a certain model of permeability ratio and thickness ratio of high and low permeability layers, under the condition of the same total volume of chemical agents, the chemical flooding numerical simulator is used to calculate the recovery factors of different sectional slug volume ratios; as shown in the FIG. 4.

[0089] Finally, a scatter plot was drawn with the sectional slug volume ratio as the horizontal axis and the recovery factor as the vertical axis. The sectional slug volume ratios corresponding to the maximum recovery factor was obtained by fitting, that is, the optimal sectional slug volume ratio under the specified condition of the permeability ratio and the thickness ratio of the high and low permeability layers.

[0090] In the Embodiment, reservoir simulation models with a single well group composed of the two layers is established to carry out numerical simulation of chemical flooding. The permeability ratio of two layers is 3, 5 and 7 respectively, and the thickness ratio of the high and low permeability layers is 0.1, 0.4 and 0.6. Chemical flooding is divided into two stage according to the different chemical slug concentration. Under the condition of same injected chemical agents volume, changing the size of the two slug, numerical simulation models with sectional slug volume ratios of 0.17, 0.27, 0.4, 0.75, 1.33, 2.5 are established to calculate the recovery factor and determine the optimal sectional slug volume ratio.

[0091] {circle around (2)} The horizontal axis was taken as the product of the thickness ratio of the high and low permeability layers and the permeability ratio of step {circle around (1)}, and the vertical axis was taken as the optimal sectional slug volume ratios of chemical flooding. A scatter plot was drawn, and the standard plate of the sectional slug volume ratios of chemical flooding was obtained through nonlinear regression; as shown in the FIG. 2.

[0092] The product of the thickness ratio of the high and low permeability layers and the permeability ratio was found to have a quadratic polynomial relationship with the optimal sectional slug volume ratio in chemical flooding. The least square method was used for regression, and the quadratic polynomial coefficient was calculated. The curve of the quadratic polynomial obtained was plotted in the coordinate axis, which is the standard plate of the sectional slug volume ratios of chemical flooding.

[0093] {circle around (3)} The product of thickness ratio of high and low permeability layers and permeability ratio of each well is determined, and the optimal sectional slug volume ratios of chemical flooding d.sub.1:d.sub.2 are determined with the standard plate of the sectional slug volume ratios. The sectional slug volume ratios of chemical flooding d.sub.1:d.sub.2 refers to the ratio of the volume of chemical flooding slug 1 to the volume of chemical flooding slug 2 which adjacent to the chemical flooding slug 1.

[0094] According to the calculated layer combination results, the effective thickness and permeability of each layer in each injector are counted, and the product of the thickness ratio of high and low permeability layers and the permeability ratio of each well is calculated. The designed chemical agent concentration is 4kg/m.sup.3. And the volume ratio of slug 1 to slug 2 obtained according to the diagram is shown in Table 2.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Effective Effective Permeabil- Permeabil- thickness thickness ity of high ity of low of high of low Volume permeabil- permeabil- permeabil- permeabil- ratio of ity layer/ ity layer/ ity layer/ ity layer/ slug 1 to Injector (10.sup.−3 μm.sup.2) (10.sup.−3 μm.sup.2) m m slug 2 C5 1752.3 854.6 9.6 8.5 1.41:1 C11 1103.2 536.4 7.6 7.6 1.37:1 C15 1732.4 962.5 8.2 8.6 1.30:1 C9 1752.3 1057.5 9.4 7.9 1.35:1 C14 743.6 429.5 7.3 9.2 1.22:1 C19 985.5 448.9 8.4 8.2 1.40:1 D16 1459.2 1120.3 9.6 8.6 1.24:1 C17 1834.5 1347.7 8.9 8.4 1.24:1 C21 1128.7 524.6 8.5 7.2 1.45:1

[0095] The optimization of well location, injection rate and production rate and chemical amount for single well in step (5) includes the following steps:

[0096] Considering remaining oil saturation variation coefficient which is the characterization of chemical flooding of equilibrium degree, the oil increase effect of the chemical flooding and chemical agents cost, the objective function of the injection-production optimization coordination chemical flooding achieve equilibrium displacement such as equation (IV) is determined as below:

[00006] $\begin{matrix} Obj = \frac{(1 - S_{or} - {\overline{S}}_{o} (L, q_{i}, q_{p})}{(\begin{matrix} V_{r} (S_{o} (L, q_{i}, q_{p})) \\ (\begin{matrix} P_{P} \frac{w_{p}}{w_{p} + w_{s} + w_{g}} + \\ P_{S} \frac{w_{s}}{w_{p} + w_{s} + w_{g}} + \\ P_{g} \frac{w_{g}}{w_{p} + w_{s} + w_{g}} \end{matrix}) \end{matrix} {.Math.}_{i = 1}^{n} C_{Tc, i} V_{T, i}} & (IV) \end{matrix}$

[0097] In the equation (IV), Obj is the objective function of the injection-production optimization coordination chemical flooding achieve equilibrium displacement; L is the location coordinates of injectors and producers; q.sup.i is injection rate of each injector; q.sub.p is production rate of each producer; S.sub.or is remaining oil saturation, fraction; S.sub.o(L,q.sub.i,q.sub.p) is the average remaining oil saturation, fraction; S.sub.o(L,q.sub.i,q.sub.p) is remaining oil saturation, fraction; V.sub.r (S.sub.o) is the remaining oil saturation variation coefficient, fraction; C.sub.Tc,i is the total concentration of chemical agents injected into injector i, kg/m.sup.3; V.sub.T,i is the total volume of chemical agents injected into injector i, m.sup.3; P.sub.p is the price of polymer, yuan/kg; P.sub.S is the price of surfactant, yuan/m.sup.3; P.sub.g is the price of viscoelastic particle, yuan/kg; L,q.sub.i,q.sub.p are input into the chemical flooding numerical simulator to obtain S.sub.o(L,q.sub.i,q.sub.p).

[0098] With the maximum of Obj is the goal, the location coordinates of injectors and producers L, total chemical agents concentration injected into injector i C.sub.Tc,i, chemical agents total injection volume of injector i V.sub.T,i, liquid production rate of producers q.sub.i and liquid injection rate of injectors q.sub.p are adjustable variables. When the well location coordinates of injectors and producers, liquid production rate of producers and liquid injection rate of injectors change, the average variation coefficient of residual oil saturation and remaining oil saturation calculated by the chemical flooding numerical simulation are also change, which affects the value of the objective function. Chemical flooding numerical simulator is used to calculate Obj with combination of different value of adjustable variables, and the corresponding adjustable variable is the optimal value of each adjustable variable when Obj achieves the maximum.

[0099] In the Embodiment, remaining oil saturation, the average remaining oil saturation and the remaining oil saturation variation coefficient of the reservoir are 0.25, 0.32 and 0.34, respectively.

[0100] And the price of polymer, the price of surfactant and the price of viscoelastic particle are 12 yuan/kg, 10 yuan/m.sup.3 and 15 yuan/m.sup.3, respectively. And the value of optimal adjustable variables are shown in Table 3 and Table 4. Table 3 shows the production parameters optimization results of each producer. And Table 4 shows the injection parameters optimization results of each injector. The well location shows in the FIG. 3.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Optimal production Optimal production Producer rate/(m.sup.3/d) Producer rate/(m.sup.3/d) C29 135.51 D13 164.79 C6 219.64 C24 257.10 C12 204.20 C18 227.72 C16 114.30 C32 148.85 C4 214.55 D15 62.92 C10 372.34 D19 118.80 C30 338.05 C31 148.15 C28 180.43 C23 112.65

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Optimal total Volume of Volume of Optimal total chemical agents Optimal Concentration chemical chemical chemical agents injection injection Concentration Concentration of viscoelastic flooding flooding concentration/ volume/ rate/ of polymer/ of surfactant/ particle/ slug slug Injector (kg/m.sup.3) (m.sup.3) (m.sup.3/d) (kg/m.sup.3) (kg/m.sup.3) (kg/m.sup.3) 1/m.sup.3 2/m.sup.3 C5 3.6 1159.27 480 0.90 1.80 0.90 678.25 481.02 C11 4.6 918.44 410 1.15 2.30 1.15 530.91 387.53 C15 3.2 1011.96 450 0.80 1.60 0.80 571.98 439.98 C9 4.8 1217.28 400 1.20 2.40 1.20 699.29 517.99 C14 3.4 633.28 220 0.85 1.70 0.85 348.02 285.26 C19 4.6 853.28 240 1.15 2.30 1.15 497.75 355.53 D16 4.8 986.26 230 1.20 2.40 1.20 545.97 440.29 C17 3.8 803.88 260 0.95 1.90 0.95 445.01 358.88 C21 4.2 851.35 330 1.05 2.10 1.05 503.86 347.49

[0101] The determination of volume and concentration of sectional slug in step (6) includes the following steps:

[0102] According to the total chemical agents concentration of injector i C.sub.Tc,i, chemical agents total injection volume of injector i V.sub.T,i, optimal concentration ratio of polymers, surfactants and viscoelastic particles w.sub.p: w.sub.s: w.sub.g and optimal sectional slug volume ratios of chemical flooding d.sub.1:d.sub.2, injection concentration of each chemical agent and sectional slug volume of chemical flooding are calculated. And the chemical concentration injected into injector i C.sub.l,i is shown in equation (V):

[00007] $\begin{matrix} C_{l, i} = C_{Tc, i} \frac{w_{l}}{.Math. w_{l}} & (V) \end{matrix}$

[0103] In equation (V), l 531 {p, s, g}, w.sub.l is the optimum concentration of the chemical agents, p refer to polymer, s refer to surfactant, g refer to viscoelastic particle;

[0104] The volume of jth chemical flooding slug injected into injector i is shown in the equation (VI):

[00008] $\begin{matrix} V_{T, i, j} = V_{T, i} \frac{d_{j}}{.Math. d_{j}} & (VI) \end{matrix}$

[0105] In equation (VI), the value of j is 1 or 2, when j is 1, equation (VI) is the volume of first chemical flooding slug injected into injector. when j is 2, equation (VI) is the volume of second chemical flooding slug injected into injector.

[0106] The polymer concentration, surfactant concentration, viscoelastic particle concentration, volume of first chemical flooding slug V.sub.T,i,l and volume of second chemical flooding slug V.sub.T,i,2 of each injector calculated by equation (VI) are shown in the FIG. 4.

[0107] Based on the above results, it was substituted into the numerical simulation calculation, and the recovery factor curve obtained is shown in FIG. 4.

Chemical flooding method for balanced displacement of heterogeneous oil reservoir

Inventors

Cpc classification

Classification Explorer

E21B2200/20

FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS

Classification Explorer

Y02A10/40

GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS

Classification Explorer

E21B43/20

FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS

Classification Explorer

E21B49/00

FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS

Classification Explorer

C09K8/584

CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

Classification Explorer

G01V3/38

PHYSICS

Classification Explorer

C09K2208/30

CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

Classification Explorer

E21B43/16

FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS

Classification Explorer

C09K8/588

CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

International classification

Classification Explorer

E21B43/16

FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS

Classification Explorer

C09K8/584

CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

Classification Explorer

C09K8/588

CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

Classification Explorer

E21B49/00

FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS

Abstract

Claims

Description