ESTIMATE OF SUBSIDENCE AND COMPACTION WITH BOREHOLE GRAVITY MEASUREMENTS

Abstract

A method of estimating one or both of compaction or subsidence of a subterranean formation with gravity measurements. The free air gradient at surface is measured and compared with gravity measured in a borehole that intersects the formation. At a later point in time, values for gravity are re-measured, differences between the measured values at the initial point in time, and the later point in time are estimated. The differences are used to estimate the compaction or subsidence. A gravimeter can be used for measuring gravity, markers in the formation can be used in conjunction with the gravimeter.

Claims

1. A method of estimating compaction in a formation comprising: a. obtaining a first initial value of gravity from a first location in the formation, and which represents the force of gravity at the first location at an initial time; b. obtaining a second initial value of gravity at a second location that is spaced vertically away from the first location, and which represents the force of gravity at the second location at about the initial time; c. comparing the first and second initial values of gravity to obtain an initial difference in gravity values; d. obtaining a first later in time value of gravity from the first location, and which represents the force of gravity at the first location at a point in time later than the initial time; e. obtaining a second later in time value of gravity from the second location, and which represents the force of gravity at the second location at a point in time later than the initial time; f. obtaining a later point in time difference in gravity value by comparing the first and second later in time values of gravity; and g. estimating formation compaction by comparing the initial difference in gravity values and the later point in time difference in gravity values.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising dividing the initial difference in gravity values and the later point in time difference in gravity values by the free air constant.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the step of estimating formation compaction is further based on the gravitational constant G and density of fluid that is in the portion of the formation undergoing compaction.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the step of estimating formation compaction further considers changes in porosity of the formation being compaction and changes of density of the fluid in the formation being compaction.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the step of estimating formation compression further considers changes in the free air constant.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the first location is along a wall of a borehole that intersects the formation.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the second location comprises a place selected from the group consisting of a bottom of a borehole that intersects the formation, along a sidewall of the borehole, and on the earth's surface and outside of the borehole.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing markers at the first and second locations, and providing additional markers at locations spaced vertically away from the first and second locations, and measuring values of gravity at the additional markers at the initial time and at points in time later than the initial time.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the values of gravity are obtained with a gravimeter that is disposed in a downhole tool.

10. A method of estimating compaction in a formation comprising: a. obtaining values of gravity from vertically spaced apart locations at an initial time and at a later time, and where at least one of the locations is in the formation; b. obtaining an initial difference in gravity values between the spaced apart locations at the initial time; c. obtaining a later difference in gravity values between the spaced apart locations at the later time; and d. estimating an amount of compaction in the formation based on a comparison of the initial and later difference in gravity values.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the step of estimating an amount of compaction includes dividing a difference of the initial and later difference in gravity values by the free air constant.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the step of estimating formation compression is further based on the gravitational constant G and density of fluid that is in the portion of the formation undergoing compression.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the step of estimating formation compression further considers changes in porosity of the formation being compressed and changes of density of the fluid in the formation being compressed.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the step of estimating formation compression further considers changes in the free air constant.

15. The method of claim 10, wherein the gravity measurements are taken within a borehole that intersects the formation.

16. The method of claim 10, wherein the gravity measurement not obtained in the formation is obtained on the earth's surface above the formation.

17. The method of claim 10, wherein the gravity measurements are obtained with a gravimeter disposed in a downhole tool.

18. A method of estimating compaction in a formation comprising: a. measuring gravity at vertically spaced apart locations in a borehole that intersects the formation to obtain an initial gravity difference; b. remeasuring gravity at the vertically spaced apart locations at a point later in time to obtain a later in time gravity difference; and c. estimating compaction using the following relationship C=(Δg.sub.o−Δg.sub.T)/(F−4πGρ.sub.f), where C is the amount of compaction, Δg.sub.o is the initial gravity difference, Δg.sub.T is the later in time gravity difference, F is the free air constant, G is the gravity constant, and ρ.sub.f is a density of the fluid in the formation being compacted.

19. The method of claim 18, further comprising considering changes in porosity of the formation being compressed and changes of density of the fluid in the formation being compressed.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0010] Some of the features and benefits of the present invention having been stated, others will become apparent as the description proceeds when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0011] FIG. 1 is a side sectional view of an example of a formation intersected by a borehole and having multiple zones.

[0012] FIG. 2 is a side sectional view of the formation of FIG. 1 after a period of time and having experienced subsidence and compaction.

[0013] FIG. 3 is a side sectional view of an example of using a gravimeter to measure gravity in the borehole of FIG. 1.

[0014] FIGS. 4A and 4B are side sectional views of an example of a wellbore before and after compaction.

[0015] FIG. 5 is a graphical illustration of an example of a relationship between a porosity reduction term and fluid density.

[0016] While the invention will be described in connection with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to that embodiment. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION

[0017] The method and system of the present disclosure will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings in which embodiments are shown. The method and system of the present disclosure may be in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the illustrated embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey its scope to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout. In an embodiment, usage of the term “about” includes +/−5% of the cited magnitude. In an embodiment, usage of the term “substantially” includes +/−5% of the cited magnitude.

[0018] It is to be further understood that the scope of the present disclosure is not limited to the exact details of construction, operation, exact materials, or embodiments shown and described, as modifications and equivalents will be apparent to one skilled in the art. In the drawings and specification, there have been disclosed illustrative embodiments and, although specific terms are employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for the purpose of limitation.

[0019] Referring to FIG. 1, an example is shown in side sectional view of a wellbore 10 that projects downward into a subterranean formation 12. A derrick 14 is mounted on surface S and over wellbore 10. Included in the formation are zones Z.sub.1, Z.sub.2, Z.sub.3, Z.sub.4, Z.sub.5 that are also intersected by wellbore 10. Zones Z.sub.1, Z.sub.2, Z.sub.3, Z.sub.4, Z.sub.5 are separated from one another by boundary lines L.sub.1, L.sub.2, L.sub.3, L.sub.4. In one example FIG. 1 illustrates the formation 12 prior to fluid production, and where pressure in the reservoir and stress in the rock balance the overburden pressure and the reservoir stays in equilibrium and maintains its shape. As illustrated in FIG. 2, subsidence and compaction can occur within the formation 12 over time due to fluids being produced from the formation 12. Removing fluid from the reservoir lowers reservoir pressure, and if the rock strength is insufficient to support the weight of formation above it, rock strain is increased vertically to cause compaction in the reservoir. Compaction rates as measured over a nominal 10 meter interval can be as high as 50 mm/year, but are more typically 0.5 mm/year. (Mirzwinski, 2014). Subsidence, as illustrated by arrow A.sub.S, causes a lowering of the surface S. Similarly in the example illustrated, compaction, which can be represented by a difference in arrows A.sub.C1, A.sub.C2, results in a shift in lines L.sub.1, L.sub.2, L.sub.3, and compression of zones Z.sub.1, Z.sub.2, Z.sub.3, Z.sub.4.

[0020] FIG. 3 is a side sectional example of the formation 12 and wellbore 10 of FIGS. 1 and 2. Optionally a wellhead assembly 16 is over the wellbore 10 instead of the derrick 14 (FIG. 2). A wellbore tool 18 is shown inserted into the wellbore 10, and which includes a gravimeter 20. An example of a gravimeter for use with what is described in the present disclosure can be found in Edwards et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0271549, having Ser. No. 13/449,788, filed Apr. 18, 2012, and assigned to the assignee of the present application; and which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes. Markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2, are shown illustrated in the formation 12 at known depths and spaced axially apart at different depths in the wellbore 10. Markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2, can also be referred to as features; and examples exist wherein material for the markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2 includes radioactive material, such as bullets. Alternatively, the 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2, can be in collars of tubulars disposed downhole, as well as large rapid changes as a function of depth of the intensity of naturally emitted gamma-rays that typically occur at the boundary between sandstone and shale rock types or other reservoir features. Other suitable formation features will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. A sensor sub 24 in the tool 18 is equipped with sensors (not shown) for detecting the proximity of the markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2. Example sensors include radiation detectors, seismic receivers, electro-magnetic wave sensors, and the like. Measurement of the compaction shown in FIG. 2 can be estimated with the system illustrated in FIG. 3. In an example of use, a free air gradient, such as that described above, is measured at surface S. Gravity at vertically spaced apart locations is measured, where at least one of the locations is within the formation, and a difference between the measured values of gravity is obtained. In one example, the locations are in the wellbore 10, such as at markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2. At a point in time later, which can be hours, days, weeks, months, or years, gravity at the aforementioned locations in the wellbore 10 (i.e. at markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2) is re-measured and another difference between the measured values of gravity is obtained. An analysis of the differences between the gravity values over time can yield a change in spacing between the markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2, which in turn can be used to estimate compaction, a rate of compaction, subsidence, or a rate of subsidence in the formation 12. The differences in gravity can be obtained by measurements at the markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2 alone, one of the markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2 and at or above surface S, or both markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2 and at or above surface S. One of the advantages of the method and system described herein is that compaction can be measured without contacting the formation 12, and without the need to insert a probe or other invasive instrument into the formation 12 during the step of measuring. Additional advantages of the method and system described herein include the ability to estimate compaction, a rate of compaction, subsidence, or a rate of subsidence in the formation, without the need for radioactive material or any type of ballistics. Moreover, the disclosed method and system can be used to measure compaction over intervals of less than 10 meters and in excess of 100 meters, and is not limited to spacing constraints.

[0021] FIGS. 4A and 4B provide side sectional illustrations of how the distance between markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2 can change over time when compaction takes place in the formation 12. More specifically, depicted in FIG. 4A are markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2 disposed in the formation 12, and where ΔZ.sub.o represents a vertical distance between marker 22.sub.1 and marker 22.sub.2 at an initial point in time. Further illustrated in this example is that marker 22.sub.1 is in zone Z.sub.3, and marker 22.sub.2 is in zone Z.sub.4. FIG. 4B depicts how the vertical distance between the markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2 has changed at a point in time, which occurs after the initial point in time as represented in FIG. 4A. In the example of FIG. 4B, some compaction has taken place in the formation 12 within zone Z.sub.3, which results in some subsidence Y.sub.S, which in turn creates an elevational drop in the upper boundary of zone Z.sub.3.

[0022] As provided above, in one example compaction in the formation 12 is estimated by measuring a change in the gravity differences between the markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2 caused by the compaction. Equation (1) below provides an example relationship for compaction where it is assumed that no fluid flows from the formation being compacted:

C=(Δg.sub.o−Δg.sub.T)/F.  (1)

[0023] In Equation (1) C represents compaction in meters; Δg.sub.o represents a difference in gravity between markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2 prior to compaction (at the initial point in time); Δg.sub.T represents a difference in gravity between markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2 after compaction (after the initial point in time); and F represents the free air gradient. In an embodiment, the free air gradient F is assumed to be a constant 3.086×10-6 uGal/(m×s.sup.2). Here the layered earth model is being used for gravity near the Earth's surface such that:

Δg=(FΔZ−B)  (1.1)

[0024] In Equation (1.1) B is the Bouguer term. It represents the gravity caused by a horizontal slab of earth between two measurements points. It is

[00001]$\begin{array}{cc}B=4.Math.\pi .Math..Math.G.Math.{\int }_{{\mathrm{ZZ}}_1}^{{\mathrm{ZZ}}_2}.Math.\rho \left(z\right).Math.\mathrm{dz},& \left(1.2\right)\end{array}$

[0025] Where G represents the gravitational constant (6.674×10-11 Nm.sup.2 kg.sup.−2); and ρ represents density between the two measurement point either before or after compaction. Here it is assumed that no fluid flowing out during compaction is equivalent to a situation that the total mass between the measurement points is conserved and the Bouguer term is constant.

[0026] Eqn. (1) represents an example of a first approximation to compaction. But fluids often do flow from reservoirs during compaction. In fact, “compaction drive accounts a significant fraction of the produced fluids in the Ekofisk formation. Fertl, W., G. V. Chilingarian, et al. (1995). Surveillance Technology To Detect And Monitor Compaction And Subsidence Effects. Subsidence Due to Fluid Withdrawal. G. V. Chilingarian, E. C. Donaldson and T. F. Yen, Elsevier: 439. DOI:10.1016/S0376-7361(06)80057-9; and Sulak, R. M. and J. Danielsen (1989). “Reservoir Aspects of Ekofisk Subsidence.” Journal of Petroleum Technology 41(7). DOI:10.2118/17852-PA.

[0027] To improve the approximation for compaction, several cases can be considered. In one example the case to consider is when the density of the fluid flowing from the reservoir is constant over time. This might be the case for compaction of a water zone in a reservoir or compaction in an aquifer. Equation (2) below provides the relationship for when fluid density flowing from the reservoir remains constant over time.

C=(Δg.sub.o−Δg.sub.T)/(F−4πGρ.sub.f).  (2)

[0028] Where ρ.sub.f represents fluid density. Thus in the example where compaction C is estimated using Equation (2), the density of the fluid flowing out of the formation 12 during compaction is also estimated. Estimation of the fluid density is within the capabilities of those of ordinary skill in the art. The term 4πGρ.sub.f accounts for fluid outflow during the compaction process as the Bouguer term before compaction is different from the Bouguer term after compaction. The mass between the measurement points is no longer conserved. What is conserved is the mass of the solid matrix. This includes all of the minerals and perhaps some classes of organic material such as kerogen.

[0029] Graphically illustrated in FIG. 5 is an example plot that compares the size of 4πGρ.sub.f to the free-air gradient F. For water, the terms is about 30% of the free-air gradient. For oils, its value is somewhat less: between 20% and 30%. For methane gas it is less than 10%.

[0030] In another approximation, an outflow of fluids is considered, as well as a change in fluid density during compaction. Cases where this approximation might be needed are for oil or gas reservoirs that are under pressure drive. Another case might be a water fluid in which water is replacing oil. In this example of estimating compaction:

C=(Δg.sub.o−Δg.sub.T+4πGΔρ.sub.fφ′ΔZ.sub.o)/(F−4πG(ρ.sub.f−Δρ.sub.fφ′))  (3)

[0031] Where ΔZ.sub.o represents a depth difference between the markers 22.sub.1, 22.sub.2 prior to compaction; and φ′ represents porosity in the formation 12 after compaction. In this approximation two addition terms are included, which are proportional to the porosity after compaction and the change in density of the fluids. If the change in density is small these terms may be safely ignored. Thus in the example wherein Equation (3) is implemented to estimate compaction C, porosity of the formation 12 is evaluated, which is also within the capabilities of those of ordinary skill in the art. Those skilled in the art may also find equivalent expressions for Equation (3) that use the porosity before compaction and/or the distance between markers after compaction.

[0032] Equation 4 below provides a relationship for estimating compaction that considers fluid flowing from the formation 12 during compaction, a change in fluid density, and a change in the free air gradient. Tectonic events, such as an earthquake, can affect the free air gradient.

C=(Δg.sub.o−Δg.sub.T−(ΔF−4πGΔρ.sub.fφ′)ΔZ.sub.o)/(F.sub.T−4πG(ρ.sub.f−Δρ.sub.fφ′)).  (4)

[0033] Where F.sub.T represents the free air gradient at a time T after the initial period of time, and that can be after the formation 12 has been compacted; and ΔF represents a difference in the free air gradient F between the initial time and a time T after the initial period of time. Where the relationship outlined in Equation 4 is used to estimate compaction C, values of the free air gradient F are obtained, another step which is within the capabilities of one of ordinary skill in the art.

[0034] In addition to measuring compaction, estimates of subsidence within the formation can be made when one of the measurement points (i.e. markers or features) is fixed over time, or when its change in position is well known. An example of the former is the use of any point that is below the production zones of the reservoir, such as at the bottom of the well. An example of the later is the use of a point at the well head, where its movement can be quantified by global positioning satellite (“GPS”) or other common means of measuring subsidence.

[0035] Finally, it is to be noted that Equations (2) through (4) use single values for density and porosity. This can be deemed equivalent to assuming that the reservoir between the measurement points is a single uniform layer. Equations (2) though (4) can be generalized to multiple layers simply by replacing the density and porosity with the depth averaged quantities of those values.

[0036] The present invention described herein, therefore, is well adapted to carry out the objects and attain the ends and advantages mentioned, as well as others inherent therein. While a presently preferred embodiment of the invention has been given for purposes of disclosure, numerous changes exist in the details of procedures for accomplishing the desired results. For example, an array of quad sensors for downhole use can be included in place of, or included with, the gravimeter. Further, the number of markers or features disposed in the wellbore can be more than two. Additionally, the markers can be congregated within a single zone in the formation, or spread among more than one zone. These and other similar modifications will readily suggest themselves to those skilled in the art, and are intended to be encompassed within the spirit of the present invention disclosed herein and the scope of the appended claims.