DIMPLE PATTERNS FOR GOLF BALLS
20170225040 · 2017-08-10
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
A63B37/0021
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
The present invention provides dimple patterns with icosahedral tilings where the dimples are arranged in multiple copies of a first domain and a second domain, and the dimple pattern in the first domain is different than the dimple pattern in the second domain. A majority of dimples are provided having a first plan shape and a first profile shape, and at least one of the domains has a sub-pattern of nearest neighbor dimples having either a plan shape or a dimple profile shape that is different than the majority of dimples.
Claims
1. A golf ball having an outer surface comprising a plurality of dimples disposed thereon, wherein the dimples are arranged in multiple copies of a first domain and a second domain, and the dimple pattern in the first domain is different than the dimple pattern in the second domain, wherein the first domain and the second domain are tessellated to cover the outer surface of the golf ball in a uniform pattern having no great circles and consisting of twenty first domains and twelve second domains, and wherein, a majority of dimples have a first plan shape and a first profile shape, and wherein at least one of the domains has a sub-pattern of nearest neighbor dimples having either a plan shape or a dimple profile shape that is different than the majority of dimples.
2. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein the first domain has three-way rotational symmetry about a central point of the first domain and the second domain has five-way rotational symmetry about a central point of the second domain.
3. The golf ball of claim 2, wherein the sub-pattern of nearest neighbor dimples are axially symmetric about the central point of one of the two domains.
4. The golf ball of claim 2, wherein the sub-pattern of nearest neighbor dimples have a different plan shape than the majority of dimples.
5. The golf ball of claim 4, wherein the majority of dimples have a continuous plan shape and the sub-pattern dimples have a plan shape that is discontinuous.
6. The golf ball of claim 4, wherein the majority of dimples have a circular plan shape.
7. The golf ball of claim 6, wherein the sub-pattern of dimples have a polygonal plan shape.
8. The golf ball of claim 6, wherein the sub-pattern of dimples have plan shapes based on periodic functions along a path.
9. The golf ball of claim 6, wherein the sub-pattern of dimples have plan shapes made of circular arcs derived from polygons.
10. The golf ball of claim 2, wherein the sub-pattern of nearest neighbor dimples have a different dimple profile shape than the majority of dimples.
11. The golf ball of claim 10, wherein the majority of the dimples and the sub-pattern of dimples have different dimple profiles and are chosen from the group of spherical, conical, catenary, and Gabriel's horn.
12. The golf ball of claim 10, wherein the majority of dimples are spherical.
13. The golf ball of claim 12, wherein the sub-pattern of dimples are conical.
14. The golf ball of claim 12, wherein the sub-pattern of dimples are catenary.
15. The golf ball of claim 12, wherein the sub-pattern of dimples are chosen from the group of circumscribed prismatoids, rotational protrusions, frequency dimples, superposition dimples, Gabriel's horn dimples, or grooved dimple profiles.
16. The golf ball of claim 2, wherein the sub-pattern of dimples are all classified as interior dimples within a domain.
17. The golf ball of claim 16, wherein all of the interior dimples in one domain are sub-pattern dimples.
18. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein the sub-pattern of dimples are all classified as perimeter dimples within a domain.
19. The golf ball of claim 18, wherein all of the perimeter dimples of one domain are sub-pattern dimples.
20. The golf ball of claim 2, wherein the sub-pattern of dimples are both interior dimples and perimeter dimples within a domain.
21. The golf ball of claim 20, wherein the sub-pattern dimples are classified as perimeter dimples from the first domain and perimeter dimples from the second domain.
22. The golf ball of claim 2, wherein at least one sub-pattern dimple is at the center of one domain.
23. The golf ball of claim 22, wherein there is a sub-pattern dimple at the center of both domains.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0027] In the accompanying drawings which form a part of the specification and are to be read in conjunction therewith and in which like reference numerals are used to indicate like parts in the various views:
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0051] The present invention provides a method for arranging dimples on a golf ball surface in a pattern derived from at least one irregular domain generated from a regular or non-regular polyhedron. In the invention as described below extends the method of spherical tiling to include sub-patterns of dimples within the base geometry dimple packing. Unique patterns are thus created with improved aerodynamics and visual aesthetics.
[0052] In one embodiment, illustrated in
[0053] The irregular domains can be defined through the use of any one of the exemplary methods described herein. Each method produces one or more unique domains based on circumscribing a sphere with the vertices of a regular polyhedron. The vertices of the circumscribed sphere based on the vertices of the corresponding polyhedron with origin (0,0,0) are defined below in Table 1.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Vertices of Circumscribed Sphere based on Corresponding Polyhedron Vertices Type of Polyhedron Vertices Tetrahedron (+1, +1, +1); (−1, −1, +1); (−1, +1, −1); (+1, −1, −1) Cube (±1, ±1, ±1) Octahedron (±1, 0, 0); (0, ±1, 0); (0, 0, ±1) Dodecahedron (±1, ±1, ±1); (0, ±1/φ, ±φ); (±1/φ, ±φ, 0); (±φ, 0, ±1/φ)* Icosahedron (0, ±1, ±φ); (±1, ±φ, 0); (±φ, 0, ±1)* *φ = (1 + {square root over (5)})/2
[0054] Each method has a unique set of rules which are followed for the domain to be symmetrically patterned on the surface of the golf ball. Each method is defined by the combination of at least two control points. These control points, which are taken from one or more faces of a regular or non-regular polyhedron, consist of at least three different types: the center C of a polyhedron face; a vertex V of a face of a regular polyhedron; and the midpoint M of an edge of a face of the polyhedron.
[0055] The two control points C, M, or V may be of the same or different types. Accordingly, six types of methods for use with regular polyhedrons are defined as follows:
[0056] 1. Center to midpoint (C.fwdarw.M);
[0057] 2. Center to center (C.fwdarw.C);
[0058] 3. Center to vertex (C.fwdarw.V);
[0059] 4. Midpoint to midpoint (M.fwdarw.M);
[0060] 5. Midpoint to Vertex (M.fwdarw.V); and
[0061] 6. Vertex to Vertex (V.fwdarw.V).
[0062] While each method differs in its particulars, they all follow the same basic scheme. First, a non-linear sketch line is drawn connecting the two control points. This sketch line may have any shape, including, but not limited, to an arc, a spline, two or more straight or acute lines or curves, or a combination thereof. Second, the sketch line is patterned in a method specific manner to create a domain, as discussed below. Third, when necessary, the sketch line is patterned in a second fashion to create a second domain.
[0063] While the basic scheme is consistent for each of the six methods, each method preferably follows different steps in order to generate the domains from a sketch line between the two control points, as described below with reference to each of the methods individually.
The Center to Vertex Method
[0064] Referring again to
[0070] When domain 14 is tessellated to cover the surface of golf ball 10, as shown in
[0071] TABLE 2: Domains Resulting from Use of Specific Polyhedra when Using the
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Domains Resulting Form Use of Specific Polyhedra When Using the Center to Vertex Method Type of Number of Faces, Number Number of Domains Polyhedron P.sub.F of Edges, P.sub.E 14 Tetrahedron 4 3 6 Cube 6 4 12 Octahedron 8 3 12 Dodecahedron 12 5 30 Icosahedron 20 3 30
The Center to Midpoint Method
[0072] Referring to
[0073] 1. A regular polyhedron is chosen (
[0074] 2. A single face 16 of the regular polyhedron is chosen, shown in
[0075] 3. Center C of face 16, and midpoint M.sub.1 of a first edge E.sub.1 of face 16 are connected with a segment 18;
[0076] 4. A copy 20 of segment 18 is rotated about center C, such that copy 20 connects center C with a midpoint M.sub.2 of a second edge E.sub.2 adjacent to first edge E.sub.1. The two segments 16 and 18 and the portions of edge E.sub.1 and edge E.sub.2 between midpoints M.sub.1 and M.sub.2 define an element 22; and
[0077] 5. Element 22 is patterned about vertex V of face 16 which is contained in element 22 and connects edges E.sub.1 and E.sub.2 to create a domain 14.
[0078] When domain 14 is tessellated around a golf ball 10 to cover the surface of golf ball 10, as shown in
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Domains resulting from use of specific Polyhedra when using the Center to Midpoint Method Type of Polyhedron Number of Vertices, P.sub.V Number of Domains 14 Tetrahedron 4 4 Cube 8 8 Octahedron 6 6 Dodecahedron 20 20 Icosahedron 12 12
The Center to Center Method
[0079] Referring to
[0085] When first domain 14a and second domain 14b are tessellated to cover the surface of golf ball 10, as shown in
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Domains Resulting From Use of Specific Polyhedra When Using the Center to Center Method Number of Number Number of Number of First of Second Type of Vertices, Domains Faces, Number of Domains Polyhedron P.sub.V 14a P.sub.F Edges, P.sub.E 14b Tetrahedron 4 6 4 3 4 Cube 8 12 6 4 8 Octahedron 6 9 8 3 6 Dodecahedron 20 30 12 5 20 Icosahedron 12 18 20 3 12
The Midpoint to Midpoint Method
[0086] Referring to
[0093] When first domain 14a and second domain 14b are tessellated to cover the surface of golf ball 10, as shown in
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Domains resulting from use of specific polyhedra when using the Center to Center Method Number Number of Number of Type of Number of of First Vertices, Second Domains Polyhedron Faces, P.sub.F Domains 14a P.sub.V 14b Tetrahedron 4 4 4 4 Cube 6 6 8 8 Octahedron 8 8 6 6 Dodecahedron 12 12 20 20 Icosahedron 20 20 12 12
The Midpoint to Vertex Method
[0094] Referring to
[0100] When domain 14 is tessellated to cover the surface of golf ball 10, as shown in
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Domains resulting from use of specific polyhedra when using the Midpoint to Vertex Method Type of Polyhedron Number of Faces, P.sub.F Number of Domains 14 Tetrahedron 4 4 Cube 6 6 Octahedron 8 8 Dodecahedron 12 12 Icosahedron 20 20
The Vertex to Vertex Method
[0101] Referring to
[0108] When first domain 14a and second domain 14b are tessellated to cover the surface of golf ball 10, as shown in
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Domains resulting from use of specific polyhedra when using the Vertex to Vertex Method Number of Number Number of Second Type of Number of of First Edges per Face, Domains Polyhedron Faces, P.sub.F Domains 14a P.sub.E 14b Tetrahedron 4 4 3 6 Cube 6 6 4 12 Octahedron 8 8 3 12 Dodecahedron 12 12 5 30 Icosahedron 20 20 3 30
[0109] While the six methods previously described each make use of two control points, it is possible to create irregular domains based on more than two control points. For example, three, or even more, control points may be used. The use of additional control points allows for potentially different shapes for irregular domains. An exemplary method using a midpoint M, a center C and a vertex V as three control points for creating one irregular domain is described below.
The Midpoint to Center to Vertex Method
[0110] Referring to
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Domains resulting from use of specific polyhedra when using the Midpoint to Center to Vertex Method Number Type of Number of Faces, of Domains Polyhedron P.sub.F Number of Edges, P.sub.E 14 Tetrahedron 4 3 12 Cube 6 4 24 Octahedron 8 3 24 Dodecahedron 12 5 60 Icosahedron 20 3 60
[0116] While the methods described previously provide a framework for the use of center C, vertex V, and midpoint M as the only control points, other control points are useable. For example, a control point may be any point P on an edge E of the chosen polyhedron face. When this type of control point is used, additional types of domains may be generated, though the mechanism for creating the irregular domain(s) may be different. An exemplary method, using a center C and a point P on an edge, for creating one such irregular domain is described below.
The Center to Edge Method
[0117] Referring to
[0123] When domain 14 is tessellated to cover the surface of golf ball 10, as shown in
TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Domains resulting from use of specific polyhedra when using the Center to Edge Method Number Type of Number of Faces, of Domains Polyhedron P.sub.F Number of Edges, P.sub.E 14 Tetrahedron 4 3 6 Cube 6 4 12 Octahedron 8 3 12 Dodecahedron 12 5 30 Icosahedron 20 3 30
[0124] Though each of the above described methods has been explained with reference to regular polyhedrons, they may also be used with certain non-regular polyhedrons, such as Archimedean Solids, Catalan Solids, or others. The methods used to derive the irregular domains will generally require some modification in order to account for the non-regular face shapes of the non-regular solids. An exemplary method for use with a Catalan Solid, specifically a rhombic dodecahedron, is described below.
A Vertex to Vertex Method for a Rhombic Dodecahedron
[0125] Referring to
[0129] When domain 14 is tessellated to cover the surface of golf ball 10, as shown in
[0130] One additional embodiment to the above methods of spherical tiling extends these methods to include sub-patterns of dimples within the irregular domain(s) dimple packing 101. The method includes choosing a spherical tiling base geometry and tiling method, defining a sub-pattern of nearest neighbor dimples 102 within the irregular domain(s), and packing dimples within the remaining un-dimpled region. Until the present invention, arranging dimples on the surface of a golf ball has previously been done solely working within a segment of the desired dimple pattern geometry. The present invention is novel because a sub-pattern of nearest neighbor dimples is first defined on the blank spherical segment of the irregular domain(s). The remaining un-dimpled regions are then packed around the initial defining sub-pattern of nearest neighbor dimples. This can yield both aesthetic and aerodynamic performance advantages.
[0131] The process is started with a spherical section, which is circumscribed using the vertices of a regular polyhedron (as previously shown in Table 1), and it should be understood that any of the polyhedron types listed in Table 1 can be used. Illustrative examples, shown here consist of a tetrahedron and an icosahedron. Using the mid-point to mid-point tiling method and a tetrahedral base, the irregular domains 101 illustrated in
[0132] The dimple sub-pattern can be defined as nearest neighbor dimples on or within edges of one or more of the irregular domains. The sub-pattern 102 in the current example is defined within both irregular domains. Once the sub-pattern is defined, the remaining unpacked spherical region is packed around the initial sub-pattern of dimples as illustrated in
[0133] Although the dimple sub-pattern is defined by nearest neighbor dimples, each instance of the sub-pattern may or may not be continuously connected by sub-pattern nearest neighbor dimples around the ball surface after the domains are tessellated.
[0134] The method of determining nearest neighbor dimples is illustrated in
[0135] Additional examples use an icosahedron as the base pattern and the midpoint to midpoint method to create two irregular domains 101 in
[0136] Visual distinction may be achieved between the sub-pattern dimples and the remaining dimples, by exhibiting the sub-pattern dimples with one or more of the following characteristics: different perimeter shape; dimple profile; color; texture; grooves; or brambles. Also, the dimples packing the remaining spherical region, which is defined by the existing dimple sub-pattern, may have different perimeter shape, dimple profile, color, or texture.
[0137] Dimples with circular perimeters should have diameters that fall within the range of 0.100 to 0.220 inches. Dimples with non-circular perimeters should be circumscribed by a circle with a diameter that falls within the range of 0.120 to 0.270 inches.
[0138] Each irregular domain preferably contains between 10 and 115 dimples, and the nearest initial sub-pattern of nearest neighbor dimples preferably contains between 2 and 80 dimples.
[0139] Preferred high performance golf balls will usually have a staggered parting line that passes through the section and normally intersects two edges of the section.
[0140] The surface coverage of the dimples on the golf ball should be between 70 to 90%, while the surface coverage of the nearest neighbor sub-pattern of dimples should be between 10% and 60%.
[0141] Dimples may exhibit a contrasting color(s); the perimeter shape may be circular, polygonal, or elliptical. Dimple profiles can include, but are not limited to, spherical, Gabriel's horn, catenary, conical, Witch of Agnesi, chalice, elliptical, superposition of two curves, or any other spherically weighted profile.
[0142] There are no limitations on how the dimples are packed. There are likewise no limitations to the dimple shapes or profiles selected to pack the domains. Though the present invention includes substantially circular dimples in one embodiment, dimples or protrusions (brambles) having any desired characteristics and/or properties may be used. For example, in one embodiment the dimples may have a variety of shapes and sizes including different depths and widths. In particular, the dimples may be concave hemispheres, or they may be triangular, square, hexagonal, catenary, polygonal or any other shape known to those skilled in the art. They may also have straight, curved, or sloped edges or sides. Any type of dimple or protrusion (bramble) known to those skilled in the art may be used with the present invention. Alternatively, the tessellation can create a pattern that covers more than about 60%, preferably more than about 70% and preferably more than about 80% of the golf ball surface.
[0143] In other embodiments, the domains may not be packed with dimples, and the borders of the irregular domains may instead comprise ridges or channels. In golf balls having this type of irregular domain, the one or more domains or sets of domains preferably overlap to increase surface coverage of the channels.
[0144] When the domain(s) is patterned onto the surface of a golf ball, the arrangement of the domains dictated by their shape and the underlying polyhedron ensures that the resulting golf ball has a high order of symmetry, equaling or exceeding 12. The order of symmetry of a golf ball produced using the method of the current invention will depend on the regular or non-regular polygon on which the irregular domain is based. The order and type of symmetry for golf balls produced based on the five regular polyhedra are listed below in Table 10.
TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Symmetry of Golf Ball of the Present Invention as a Function of Polyhedron Type of Polyhedron Type of Symmetry Symmetrical Order Tetrahedron Chiral Tetrahedral Symmetry 12 Cube Chiral Octahedral Symmetry 24 Octahedron Chiral Octahedral Symmetry 24 Dodecahedron Chiral Icosahedral Symmetry 60 Icosahedron Chiral Icosahedral Symmetry 60
[0145] The benefits of these high orders of symmetry include more even dimple distribution, the potential for higher packing efficiency, and improved means to mask the ball parting line. Further, dimple patterns generated in this manner may have improved flight stability and symmetry as a result of the higher degrees of symmetry.
[0146] In other embodiments, the irregular domains do not completely cover the surface of the ball, and there are open spaces between domains that may or may not be filled with dimples. This allows dissymmetry to be incorporated into the ball.
[0147] In another embodiment, the present invention is directed to dimple patterns based on icosahedral tilings. Isocsahedral tiling is specifically described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,504,877, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The dimple pattern of the present embodiment is arranged in two irregular domains as described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,468,810 and U.S. application Ser. No. 15/263,408, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. The preferred icosahedron pattern of the present invention consists of twenty irregular first domains and twelve irregular second domains. Preferably, the first and second irregular domains are tessellated to cover the outer surface of the golf ball in a uniform pattern having no great circles. The dimples within the irregular domains consist of a first dimple type that makes up the majority of the dimples on the golf ball and a second dimple type that is different from the first dimple type and constitutes a sub-pattern of nearest neighbor dimples within the irregular domains.
[0148] The sub-pattern dimples, or second dimple type, are different in either dimple profile shape and/or in dimple plan shape (i.e. perimeter shape). The sub-pattern of dimples preferably has more than one dimple.
[0149] Dimple profiles of either the majority dimples (first dimple type) or the sub-pattern of dimples (second dimple type) may be selected from the group of: spherical dimples, conical dimples as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,137,217, 8,632,426 and 9,220,945 the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, dimples with rotational protrusions as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,353,789 the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, circumscribed prismatoids as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,926,453 and 8,317,638 the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, frequency dimples or Witch of Agnesi curve dimples as described in U.S. Publ. No. 2012/0122613 the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, catenary dimples as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,887,439, 7,641,572, 7,163,472 and 6,796,912 the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, superposition dimples as described in U.S. Publ. Nos. 2016/0279478, 2016/0129314 and 2015/0119171 the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, Gabriel's horn dimples as described in U.S. Publ. No. 2013/0172124 the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, and grooved dimples as described in U.S. Publ. No. 2014/0135146 the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0150] Dimple plan shapes of either the majority dimples (first dimple types) or the sub-pattern of dimples (second dimple types) may be selected from one of: circular, polygonal, periodic functions along a path as described in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 14/941,841, 14/948,251 and 14/948,252 the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, circular arcs derived from polygons as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/941,916 the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, and irregularly shaped dimples.
[0151] For purposes of the embodiments described in
[0152] A specific embodiment is shown in
[0153] Referring now to the specific embodiment of
[0154] Referring now to the specific embodiment of
[0155] The preferred dimple coverage of the present invention is greater than 75%, or more preferably 80% or more preferably 85%. Preferably, dimple counts for the present invention range from about 200 to about 500 dimples and more preferably from about 300 to about 400 dimples. Preferably, dimples sizes for the present invention range from about 0.10 to about 0.22 inches, more preferably from about 0.12 to about 0.2 inches and most preferably from about 0.125 to about 0.195 inches. As will be appreciated from the drawings, the majority of dimples (first dimple type) and sub-pattern dimples (second dimple type) may include dimples of different sizes.
[0156] While the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not of limitation. It will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art that various changes in form and detail can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, while the preferred polyhedral shapes have been provided above, other polyhedral shapes could also be used. Thus the present invention should not be limited by the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.