System and methods for ablation treatment of tissue
20170224402 · 2017-08-10
Inventors
Cpc classification
A61B18/1482
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B2018/1467
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B90/37
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B2018/1861
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61B18/18
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B34/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B34/10
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B18/12
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B90/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B34/20
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
This invention pertains a system and methods for ablation treatment of tissues. The invention aims to aid healthcare professionals in completely treating all the target tissues by fusing computer generated information highlighting which tissues have been treated and which not to images of the tissues. The systems and methods integrate seamlessly with current image-guided procedures and do not require tracking systems to gather the position of the ablation device, as the position and orientation of the device are identified from images. The invention aims also to improve estimates of the ablation volumes associated to an ablation device by identifying from images the true geometry of devices that might deform during the deployment in tissues; the invention aims to improve estimates of the ablation volumes by using information about the ablation process and about the status of tissues which can be collected from the control system of the ablation device.
Claims
1. A system for ablation treatment of tissues comprising: at least one tissue ablation device (1) which can consist, for example, in an RF ablation electrode working in monopolar fashion, or multiple RFA electrodes working in multipolar fashion, or a microwave ablation antenna, or a cryoablation probe, or in one or multiple irreversible electroporation electrodes working together, or in an other thermal and non-thermal ablation device to be used for treating tissues with at least one ablation; an ablation device controller (2) which controls the ablation process performed by the ablation device (1); the ablation device controller (2) can, for example, generate and apply RF energy to one or multiple RFA electrodes, generate and apply energy to one or multiple MWA ablation antennas, generate and apply electric pulses to one or multiple IRE electrodes, cause the refrigeration of one or multiple cry-ablation probes; wherein said ablation device controller (2) might be able to collect and provide data characterizing the ablation process, like, for example the applied RF or microwave power; wherein said ablation device controller (2) might be able to collect and provide data characterizing the status of the tissues, like, for example, the electrical impedance, the electromagnetic reflection coefficient, and the temperature; an imaging component (3) for obtaining images of the tissues being treated, wherein the acquired images might capture the ablation device (1) deployed in the tissues; a tissue segmentation component (4) which allows an operator to select a reference image from the images acquired by the imaging component (3) and to define on this reference image, using a GUI, the tissues that are target for the treatment; the definition of the target tissues by the operator can be manual, or assisted by semi-automatic, or by automatic algorithms; an ablation device identification component (5) able to identify, by using automatic, semi-automatic, or manual algorithms, possibly requiring the intervention of an operator through a GUI, the position and orientation of the ablation devices (1) in confirmation images acquired with the imaging component (3); the ablation device identification component (5) registers confirmation images to the reference image of the target definition component (4) in order to refer the identified position and orientation of the ablation device (1) to the reference image where target tissues are defined; an adequacy evaluation component (6) which builds a map of treated tissues and generates in a GUI 2D or 3D views of at least the reference image defined in the tissue segmentation component (4) and uses computer graphics to highlight which target tissues have been treated, or which target tissues have not been treated, or both, according to the map of treated tissues and to the defined target tissues; wherein the map of treated tissues is built by accumulating the estimated ablation volumes of single ablations using position and orientation information of the ablation device (1) provided by the ablation device identification component (5), or from tissue images available from the imaging component (3), or from a combination of the two methods;
2. The system according to claim 1 wherein the adequacy evaluation component (6) uses the ablation device (1) manufacturer's data to estimate the volume and geometry of ablations.
3. The system according to claim 1 wherein the adequacy evaluation component (6) uses computer models of the physical phenomena taking place during the ablation process to estimate the volume and geometry of ablations.
4. The system according to claim 1 wherein the adequacy evaluation component (6) uses computer models of the physical phenomena taking place during the ablation process to estimate the volume and geometry of ablations, and these models account for the “heat sink” effect of the local vasculature of the patient; wherein the tissue segmentation component (4) allows an operator to identify on the reference image, or on other images provided by the imaging component (3) and spatially registered to the reference image, the relevant vasculature using manual, semi-automatic, or automatic algorithms operated in a GUI.
5. The system according to claim 1 wherein the adequacy evaluation component (6) uses computer models of the physical phenomena taking place during the ablation process to estimate the volume and geometry of ablations, and these models account for the perfusion of the local tissues; wherein the tissue segmentation component (4) allows an operator to identify regions of tissues on the reference image, or on other images provided by the imaging component (3) and spatially registered to the reference image, and to specify specific perfusion rates for the identified regions; or wherein images provided by the imaging component (3) are used to identify tissue regions with different perfusion rates and to estimate the perfusion rates for those regions, and this information is used by the computer models.
6. The system according to claim 1 wherein the adequacy evaluation component (6) uses computer models of the physical phenomena taking place during the ablation process to estimate the volume and geometry of ablations, and these models account for the true geometry of the ablation device (1) as deployed in the tissues; wherein the true geometry of the deployed device is identified either automatically, or semi-automatically, or manually by an operator through a GUI, from images provided by the imaging component (3).
7. The system according to claim 1 wherein the adequacy evaluation component (6) uses computer models of the physical phenomena taking place during the ablation process to estimate the volume and geometry of ablations and communicates with the ablation device controller (2) to gather information that characterizes the ablation process and this information is used by the models to update the estimated volume and geometry of the ablation.
8. The system according to claim 1 wherein the adequacy evaluation component (6) uses computer models of the physical phenomena taking place during the ablation process to estimate the volume and geometry of single ablations and communicates with the ablation device controller (2) to gather information that characterizes the status of the tissues and this information is used by the models to update the estimated volume and geometry of the ablation.
9. The system according to claim 1 wherein the adequacy evaluation component (6), for the current position and orientation of the ablation device (1), as identified in images by the device identification component (5), displays in a GUI, before the activation of the device, an estimated ablation volume fused to the reference image and to computer graphics highlighting the treated target tissues, or the untreated target tissues, or both, allowing a visual assessment of which new tissues would be treated by activating the ablation device (1) at the current position and orientation.
10. A method for ablation therapy of tissue, the method comprising the steps of: collecting images of the body or part of the body with an imaging component, and defining one image as reference image (10); using a GUI to manually, semi-automatically, or fully automatically segment tissues from the reference image and define them as targets for the therapy; wherein tissue margins of a thickness specified by the operator might be automatically generated and be considered targets for the ablation (12); positioning the ablation device in tissues under conventional image guidance (16); acquiring, before starting an ablation, a confirmation image which capturers the device as deployed in the tissues (18); identifying the intracorporeal position and orientation of the device from the confirmation image (20) using image analysis algorithms; estimating the ablation volume of the device (22); using the position and orientation of the device, as identified from the confirmation image, the estimated ablation volume, and a treated tissues map, to display in a GUI at least the reference image, the target tissues including margins, the estimated ablation volume, and computer generated indications highlighting either which target tissues have already been treated, or which target tissues have not been treated, or both (24); informing through a GUI the ablation system that the ablation is being started and starting the ablation by acting on the ablation device controller (28); informing the ablation system through a GUI that the ablation has terminated, when the ablation has terminated (34); using the estimated ablation volume, and the position and orientation of the ablation device, to mark in a treated tissues map which tissues have been treated by the ablation which has been run; wherein the treated tissues map, initialized to a status of no tissues treated (10), progressively accumulates the volumes of treated tissues as one or more ablations are run, and where the map is used in (24) and (38) to determine which target tissues are to be highlighted as treated and which as not treated; displaying in a GUI at least the reference image, the target tissues including margins, and indications highlighting either which target tissues have already been treated, or which target tissues have not been treated, or both, allowing a visual evaluation of the adequacy of the procedure; repeating steps (16) to (40) until adequacy is achieved.
11. The method of claim 10, further including the steps of: segmenting on the reference image the local vasculature (14) and accounting for its heat sink effect when estimating the volume an ablation.
12. The method of claim 10, further including the steps of: segmenting on the reference image one or multiple regions of tissues and assigning them perfusion rates (14) and accounting for their effect when estimating the volume of an ablation.
13. The method of claim 10, further including the steps of: using images to identify one or multiple regions of tissues and estimating perfusion rates for these regions (14) and accounting for their effect when estimating the volume of an ablation.
14. The method of claim 10, further including the steps of: using images to identify the true geometry of the ablation device as deployed in the tissues, when the ablation device (1) might be subject to deformation, and using the identified geometry of the device as deployed in tissues to estimate the ablation volume (20).
15. The method of claim 10, further including the steps of: communicating with the ablation device controller (2) to recover information that characterized the ablation process, or that characterizes the status of the tissues, or both, and using this information to update the estimated ablation volume.
16. The method of using, in a system for ablation treatment of tissues, fully automatic image analysis algorithms, or semi-automatic algorithms operated through a GUI, or manual algorithms operated through a GUI, to identify the geometry of an ablation device, which is subject to deformation when deployed in the tissues, and to use the identified ablation device geometry to estimate the ablation volume of the ablation device.
17. The method, in a system for ablation treatment of tissues, of communicating with an ablation to retrieve at least one of data that characterizes the ablation process, such as the power delivered, and data that characterizes the status of the tissues, such as the electrical impedance of tissues, the electrometric reflection coefficient of tissues, the temperature of tissues; wherein the retrieved data is used to estimate the ablation volume of the ablation device controlled by the ablation device controller.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0044] Exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure are described hereinbelow with reference to the accompanying drawings; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely examples of the disclosure and may be embodied in various forms. Well-known functions or constructions are not described in detail to avoid obscuring the present disclosure in unnecessary detail. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present disclosure in virtually any appropriately detailed structure.
[0045] The exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure are described with respect to ablative therapy of a human, and some figures show images acquired on animals. It should be understood that the exemplary embodiments can be applied to the body, or portions of the body, whether human or animal.
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049] Additionally the tissue segmentation component (4) might offer the functionality to segment three-dimensionally local vasculature. The segmented vasculature will optionally be used by the adequacy evaluation component (6) to account for the heat-sink effect of vessels and more accurately estimate the ablation volume, as discussed later and as illustrated by
[0050] The ablation device identification component (5) is a component that uses automatic image processing algorithms, or semi-automatic image processing algorithms, or manual processes, where the operator might provide input through a GUI, to identify the intracorporeal position and orientation of the ablation device (1) and optionally to identify, for ablation devices that might be subject to deformations, the geometry of the ablation device (1) as deployed in the tissues. The intracorporeal position and orientation of the ablation device (1), and optionally the identified geometry of the ablation device (1), are fed to the adequacy evaluation component (6) and will be used to build a map of treated tissues as discussed later.
[0051] Identifying the position and orientation of the ablation device (1) solely from images is an advantageous embodiment, as other ablation systems are based on surgical tool tracking technologies, where the ablation device position and orientation is tracked by optical, electromagnetic, or ultrasound means using dedicated hardware and software components. The addition of these tracking components to the ablation system is expensive, increases clutter in the operating room, might pose restrictions on the movement of the operator, and requires generally the use of dedicated ablation devices that integrate with the specific tracking technology.
[0052] Certain ablation devices comprise flexible parts, or otherwise parts that are rigid, but which are mechanically connected by flexible joints. As an example,
[0053] These changes in the geometry of the ablation device (1) when deployed in tissues, which are normally not considered, affect the ablation volume of the ablation device (1).
[0054] In this advantageous embodiment the ablation device identification component (5) implements functions for identifying the intracorporeal position and orientation of the ablation device (1), and, for ablation devices which might be subject to deformation, functions for identifying the geometry of the ablation device (1) as deployed in the tissues. This identified ablation device (1) geometry will be used by the adequacy evaluation component 6) to update the estimated ablation volume of the ablation device (1), based on the deployed geometry of the ablation device (1).
[0055]
[0056]
[0057] Switching to the flowchart of
[0058] Point A and Point B define a line passing by the two points, Line AB, which is an approximation to the axis of the shaft of the electrode, as the operator is required to pick the two points only in the proximity of the shaft, but not on the shaft. The next steps of the electrode identification algorithm aim to identify the exact axis of the RFA electrode shaft.
[0059] The electrode identification algorithm computes the Line AB from Point A and Point B. The electrode identification algorithm defines a plane passing by point A, and normal to Line AB, labeled plane A, and a plane passing by point B and normal to Line AB, labelled Plane B. These planes are used for sampling the image intensity. By construction the two planes are likely to intersect the shaft of the electrode in the CT 3D image, as visible in
[0060] The CT image values, sampled on Plane A and Plane B, is illustrated in
[0061] The line “Line CD”, passing by the points Point C and Point D is therefore a good estimation of the axis of the electrode shaft, as points Point C and Point D have are on the shaft of the electrode. In
[0062] The preceding algorithm steps have estimated a line, Line CD, representing the axis of the electrode shaft as in the tissues. Additionally to these steps, full determination of the position of the electrode requires determining the position of the electrode along Line CD, or how deep the electrode has been inserted in the body along Line CD. This can be achieved locating, for example, in the image the point along Line CD where the tines attach to the electrode shaft. For this purpose the electrode identification algorithm defines a cylindrical surface over which the intensity of the image is sampled, this allows estimating such point, as discussed next.
[0063]
[0064] The objective of this next step is to determine the offset X, along Line CD, between the point C and the point where the tines attach to the electrode (905). This offset determines the position of the electrode along Line CD, and therefore completely the position and orientation of the electrode, together with Line CD which is known at this point.
[0065] The tines (901) of the RFA electrode we consider are assumed to be semi-circles with a distance between the tip of the tine (906) and the point where they connect to the shaft of the electrode (105) of R. The item (900) represents the cylindrical surface used for sampling the image. The cylinder (900) is coaxial with Line CD, has a base that passes by point C and extends vertically for a certain extension, for example R. The requirement is that the height of the sampling cylinder is greater than Y, or X+R/2, so that the cylinder is guaranteed to intersect the tines of the electrode at points 903. Point C is in the proximity of point 105 (the operator is requested to define a Point A in the proximity of the distal end of the electrode, and point C results in the neighborhood of point A)—so a height of the cylinder of R is likely to be sufficient for the tines to intersect the lateral surface of the cylinder at points 903, as in
[0066]
[0067] Detection of the local maxima of the intensity values over the surface of the cylinder allows determining the longitudinal position of the tines along Line CD, as well as the angular position around the line CD.
[0068] The image intensity values sampled on the sampling cylinder (900) can be expressed in cylindrical coordinates (z, θ) where z is a longitudinal coordinate along Line CD, with Point C as origin, and θ is the angular position around Line CD. This allows representing the sampled values in the plane (z, θ) as in
[0069] As in
[0070]
[0071] The next step of the electrode identification algorithm in the flowchart of
[0072] The ordinate of the local maxima of the CT intensity sampled on the sampling cylinder, as in
[0073]
[0074]
[0075]
[0076] The electrode identification algorithm terminates at step 70, as the position and orientation of the electrode, and the angular position of each tine are recognized.
[0077] The above paragraphs have described an exemplar embodiment of an electrode identification algorithm part of the ablation device identification component (5). Previous paragraphs have also described the components that are part of the ablation system in
[0078] The aim of adequacy evaluation component (6) is to highlight, with computer graphics, on a GUI, at any stage of a procedure, where one or multiple ablations are performed, which target tissues and margins have been treated and which not, in such a way that the adequacy can be evaluated in a visually and immediate manner.
[0079] The adequacy evaluation component (6) is best described following the flowchart of
[0080] At step 10 the operation of the ablation system starts and a suitable image of the patient is acquired. The image is fed to the tissue segmentation component (4) and defined as a reference image. The adequacy evaluation component (6) initializes a tissue damage map to have the same volume of the reference image and same spatial coordinates; the map is initialized to a status of no tissue damage.
[0081] The operator identifies/defines using the tissue segmentation component (4) the target tissues, and optionally target margins (step 12).
[0082] The operator optionally segments the local vasculature and optionally identifies/defines perfusion regions and perfusion values (step 14).
[0083] The operator uses common image guidance procedures to deploy the ablation device (1) at a desired intracorporeal location which is in operator's experience suitable to perform a first ablation. The operator, before activating the ablation device (1), acquires a confirmation image, which captures the position and orientation of the ablation device (1), and informs, though a GUI, the adequacy evaluation component (6) that a confirmation image is available (step 18).
[0084] The adequacy evaluation component (6) uses the device identification component (5) to recognize the position and orientation of the ablation device (1), and optionally the geometry of the device as deployed in the tissues (step 20).
[0085] The adequacy evaluation component (6) uses device manufacturer data to estimate the ablation volume of the device. Optionally the adequacy evaluation component (6) can use computer models that simulate the physics of the ablation process, including the heat sink effect of the local vasculature, the effect of perfusion including the different perfusion rates for different tissues, and the actual geometry of the device as deployed in the tissues to estimate an ablation volume (step 22).
[0086] The adequacy evaluation component (6) will register the confirmation image to the reference image, allowing to refer the ablation device (1) position and orientation obtained from the device identification component (5) to the reference image. This will allow the adequacy evaluation component (6) to display, fused to the reference image, and to a representation of the target tissues, an estimated ablation volume The operator will assess the effects of the ablation, and in particular which portion of target tissues would be treated, and any possible damage to non-target tissues, from the visual representation of the ablation volume, of the reference image of the patient, and of the target tissues offered in a GUI by the adequacy evaluation component (6). If previous ablations have been run, because the operator has cycled on steps 40 to 16, the adequacy evaluation component (6) will also highlight which previous tissues have been treated, or which tissues are to be treated yet, or both (step 24).
[0087] If the position and orientation of the ablation device (1) are unsatisfactory the operator will re-position appropriately the ablation device (1) under image guidance and repeat steps 12 to 26 until the position and orientation of the ablation device (1) are satisfactory (step 26).
[0088] The operator, without moving the ablation device (1) from the position which was deemed to be satisfactory at step 26, will inform, through a GUI, the adequacy evaluation component (6) that the ablation is being started, and the operator will start the ablation by operating the ablation device controller (2) (step 28).
[0089] The adequacy evaluation component (6) will optionally start a communication with the ablation device controller (2) (e.g. via a serial port, via a USB connection, via a Ethernet connection, via wireless means, or via any other means of machine-to-machine communication) for gathering information characterizing the ablation process, such as the level and duration of ablative power being applied to the tissues, or information characterizing the status of tissues like impedance data in RFA, the electromagnetic reflection coefficient data in MWA, or temperature data (step 30).
[0090] The data collected from the ablation device controller (2) during step 30 might be optionally used to update the estimated ablation volume, for example by using a computer model and re-computing the ablation volume based on the actual level of applied ablative power.
[0091] Upon termination of the ablation the operator informs the adequacy evaluation component (6), through a GUI, that the ablation has been terminated (step 34).
[0092] The adequacy evaluation component (6) uses the estimated ablation volume from step 22, or from step 32, if an update to the ablation volume was made, to mark treated tissues in the treated tissues map. The volume of tissues to be marked as treated is given from the ablation volume estimation steps 22 or 32. The spatial position and orientation of the estimated ablation volume are known form the device identification component (5) at step 20. This spatial information provided by the device identification component (5) is referred to the reference image and therefore to the treated tissues map, as the map by construction has the same system of spatial coordinates than the reference image.
[0093] The marking of tissues as treated is an accumulation process. If further ablations are performed, looping on steps 16 to 40, new tissues can be marked as treated, but a tissue that has been marked as treated cannot be unmarked.
[0094] Alternatively, when available, the adequacy evaluation component (6) might use further post-ablation images, registered to the reference image, to identify treated tissues and to mark them as treated in the treated tissues map.
[0095] The above operations complete step 36.
[0096] The treated tissues map, at this stage represents the volume of treated tissues from a first single ablation. If multiple ablations are performed looping on steps 16 to 40, the treated tissues map would have accumulated the volume of treated tissues for all the ablations that have been run.
[0097] The adequacy evaluation component (6) will display, using a GUI, the reference image defined in the tissue segmentation component (4), a representation of the target tissues, as defined in the tissue segmentation component (4), and representations that will allow the operator to estimate the adequacy. These representations, can, for example, highlight which target tissues have received treatment, or which target tissues still need treatment, or both, allowing a visual and straightforward evaluation of whether all target tissues have been treated, and therefore the evaluation of the adequacy of the procedure (step 38).
[0098]
[0099] The above operations complete step 38.
[0100] If adequacy has been reached at step 40 the procedure is terminated.
[0101] If the adequacy has not been achieved the operator will loop through steps 16 to 40 until adequacy is reached.