CATALYST FOR RECHARGEABLE ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES AND METHOD FOR MAKING THE SAME
20220037675 · 2022-02-03
Inventors
Cpc classification
Y02E60/10
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
H01M4/8875
ELECTRICITY
H01M4/8892
ELECTRICITY
H01M4/8878
ELECTRICITY
H01M4/886
ELECTRICITY
H01M4/8889
ELECTRICITY
H01M12/08
ELECTRICITY
H01M4/8825
ELECTRICITY
International classification
Abstract
According to various aspects of the present disclosure, a catalyst for rechargeable energy storage devices having a first transition metal and a second transition metal, wherein the first and second transition metals are formed on carbon nanotubes, the carbon nanotubes are doped with nitrogen and phosphorous, wherein the carbon nanotubes have edges and interlayer spaces and are axially aligned, and the first and second transition metals form bimetal centers, wherein the bimetal centers may be uniformly distributed catalytic active sites located at the edges or the interlayer spaces of the carbon nanotubes providing intercalated layers. The present FeCo—NPCNTs are a morphology-dependent catalyst that provides effective performance for bifunctional oxygen reduction reaction and oxygen evolution reaction in metal-air-cells and fuel cells.
Claims
1. A catalyst for rechargeable energy storage devices comprising: a first transition metal and a second transition metal, wherein the first and second transition metals are formed on carbon nanotubes; the carbon nanotubes are doped with nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P), wherein the carbon nanotubes have edges and interlayer spaces, and are axially aligned, wherein the carbon nanotubes are filled with intercalated layers; and the first and second transition metals are formed as bimetal centers that are principally located at the edges or the interlayer spaces of the carbon nanotubes providing catalytically active sites.
2. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the first and second transition metals are selected from the group comprising iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), manganese (Mn), and mixtures thereof.
3. The catalyst of claim 1, further comprising: the first transition metal is Fe; and the second transition metal is Co.
4. The catalyst of claim 3, wherein the bimetal centers further comprise catalytically active sites comprising single Fe and Co atoms having sub-nanometer or atomic scale, wherein the bimetal centers are uniformly distributed.
5. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the catalytically active sites are bifunctional for oxygen evolution reactions and oxygen reduction reactions.
6. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the carbon nanotubes are straight or spirally shaped having average diameters in the range of about 10 to 20 nm and average wall thickness of 5 to 10 nm, and is mesoporous with a layer thickness of 7 to 8 μm, wherein the interlayer spaces are separated by at least 0.4 nm.
7. A method for making a catalyst for rechargeable energy storage devices comprising the steps of: forming carbon nanotubes on a template, wherein the carbon nanotubes have edges and interlayer spaces and are axially aligned; doping the carbon nanotubes with N and P; and providing a coating of first transition metal and a second transition metal precursors; and annealing the first and second transition metal precursors to form bimetal centers on carbon nanotubes, wherein the bimetal centers are catalytically active sites principally located at the edges or the interlayer spaces of the carbon nanotubes, wherein the interlayer spaces are separated by at least 0.4 nm.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the first and second transition metals are selected from the group comprising Fe, Co, Ni, Mn, and mixtures thereof.
9. The method of claim 7, further comprising: the first transition metal is Fe; and the second transition metal is Co.
10. The method of claim 9, further comprising dipping the carbon nanotubes in a solution of Fe salt and Co salt to provide the coating of a first transition metal and second transition metal precursors.
11. The method of claim 7, wherein N doping the carbon nanotubes further comprises coating the carbon nanotubes with polyaniline or polyvinyl alcohol and a nitrogen source, wherein the nitrogen source comprises melamine or ammonia.
12. The method of claim 7, wherein P doping the carbon nanotubes further comprises coating the carbon nanotubes with phytic acid.
13. The method of claim 7, wherein the annealing is performed at a temperature range of 700 to 1000° C.; and wherein the bimetal centers are uniformly distributed.
14. The method of claim 9, further comprising placing the carbon nanotubes in an acid bath to remove inert iron oxides and cobalt oxides after the annealing step.
15. A rechargeable energy storage device comprising: an anode and a cathode, one or both of the anode and the cathode including a catalyst comprising: a bundle of longitudinally aligned graphitic carbon nanotubes including a first and second catalytically active transition metals incorporated longitudinally and atomically distributed at the edges or the interlayer spaces of the carbon nanotubes, wherein the carbon nanotubes are filled with intercalated layers, wherein the carbon nanotubes also include nitrogen and phosphorous atoms and/or ions chemically bonded to the graphitic carbon nanotubes and the first and second catalytically active transition metals.
16. The rechargeable energy storage device of claim 15, wherein the first and second catalytically active transition metals are selected from the group comprising Fe, Co, Ni, Mn, and mixtures thereof.
17. The rechargeable energy storage device of claim 15, further comprising: the first catalytically active transition metal is Fe; and the second catalytically active transition metal is Co.
18. The rechargeable energy storage device of claim 15, wherein the carbon nanotubes are straight or spirally shaped having average diameters in the range of about 10 to 20 nm and average wall thickness of 5 to 10 nm, and are mesoporous with a layer thickness of 7 to 8 μm, wherein the interlayer spaces are separated by at least 0.4 nm; and wherein the first and second catalytically active transition metals are uniformly distributed bimetal centers.
19. The rechargeable energy storage device of claim 15, wherein the storage device is a metal-air cell or fuel cell.
20. The rechargeable energy storage device of claim 15, wherein the storage device reaches a peak power density of 95 mW cm.sup.2.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0013] In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the present disclosure. The dimensions of the various features or elements may be arbitrarily expanded or reduced for clarity.
[0014] In the below description, various aspects of the present disclosure relating to the FeCo—NPCNTs are described with reference to the following drawings:
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0047] The following detailed description refers to the accompanying drawings that show, by way of illustration, specific details and aspects in which the present disclosure may be practiced. These aspects are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the present disclosure. Various aspects are provided for devices, and various aspects are provided for methods. It will be understood that the basic properties of the devices also hold for the methods and vice versa. Other aspects may be utilized and structural, and logical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. The various aspects are not necessarily mutually exclusive, as some aspects can be combined with one or more other aspects to form new aspects.
[0048] The present disclosure generally relates to rechargeable energy storage devices, including aqueous metal-air cells, alkaline fuel cells, and other batteries. There are numerous applications for metal-air cells and alkaline fuel cell technology, such as for electric vehicles, energy supply for remote locations, energy supply for maritime uses and stationary energy storage, as well as emergency power and disaster relief applications.
[0049] According to the present aspects of this disclosure, iron (Fe) and cobalt (Co) composites are among the more promising types of catalysts for the future generation of fuel cells and metal-air cells. The Fe and Co— nitrogen (N), coordination-based centers supported by phosphorus (P) doped carbon nanotubes (CNT) and the polyaniline-phytic acid-derived mesoporous carbon material (i.e., FeCo—NPCNTs) have a high catalytic activity that is comparable with platinum-carbon (Pt/C) but at a much lower cost than Pt/C. The present FeCo—NPCNTs are morphology-dependent catalysts that provide effective performance for bifunctional oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in metal-air cells and fuel cells. Specifically, the ORR at the cathode of the fuel cells and metal-air cells will determine the overall system performance.
[0050] The present CNTs, which consist of multiple rolled layers of sp2-hybridized carbon atoms with cylindrical nanostructure along one direction, are useful as catalyst supports due to their one-dimensional structure that enhances electron and reactant transport. The carbonization of precursor materials containing Fe, Co, or Ni may achieve a high degree of graphitization below 1000° C. Graphitic carbon is resistive to the corrosive effect of electrolytes, and therefore, the combination and confinement of the active metal-N—C centers onto corrosion resistive graphitic carbon may prohibit their aggregation and achieve the maximum atom-utilization efficiency with highly desirable long durations.
[0051] A mesoporous material is a material containing pores with diameters between 2 and 50 nm, according to IUPAC nomenclature. For comparison, IUPAC defines microporous material as a material having pores smaller than 2 nm in diameter and macroporous material as a material having pores larger than 50 nm in diameter.
[0052] In the various aspects of the present disclosure, the FeCo—NPCNT catalysts have subnanometer or atomic-scale catalytic centers that are principally confined at the edge and/or between the graphitic interlayers of N and P doped CNTs and have favorable pore structures to maximize their reaction volumes as catalysts. The electrochemical measurements show that the mesoporous N and P co-doped CNTs and the Fe and Co bimetallic centers are crucial to the good performance of FeCo—NPCNTs. The FeCo—NPCNTs show comparable performance to Pt/C in rotating disk testing. It also shows significantly higher activity and stability than commercial catalyst materials when tested in assembled Zn-air cells.
[0053] These and other advantages and features of the aspects herein disclosed will be apparent through reference to the following description and the accompanying drawings. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the features of the various aspects described herein are not mutually exclusive and can exist in various combinations and permutations. For the sake of brevity, duplicate descriptions of features and properties may be omitted.
[0054]
[0055] In
[0056] In the aspects in
[0057] As shown in
[0058] In
[0059] Zinc-air cells work like conventional batteries in that they generate electrical power from chemical reactions. But instead of packing the necessary ingredients inside the cell, zinc-air batteries get one of their main reactants-oxygen-from the outside air. Oxygen molecules enter the cell through tiny holes in the top and then come into contact with a catalytically active electrode (cathode) made of porous carbon, catalysts, and other additives. Electrolytes present in the pores of the electrode react with the oxygen to produce OH.sup.−, which will migrate through a separator to an anode that consists of a zinc plating or powder. The OH.sup.− ions bond to the zinc metal to form zincate, which immediately splits into two hydroxyls, a water molecule, and zinc oxide, and releases two electrons that travel through a circuit to power a device.
[0060]
[0061] In
[0062]
[0063] In
[0064] In Table 1, the FeCo—NPCNTs-9 samples show slightly lower Ri, which may be due to its integrated structure resulting in better conductivity in the electrodes. The same Rk agrees with the similar catalytic activity of these two catalysts and the significantly lower Rm value of FeCo—NPCNTs-9 samples show the superior structure of the FeCo—NPCNTs-9 samples in terms of mass transfer. The higher double-layer capacitive elements (C.sub.dl1 and C.sub.dl2) show an increased tri-phase interface area of the cell with FeCo—NPCNTs-9 samples.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 EIS Fitted results Pt/C on FeCo- Component GF NPCNTs-9 Re External ohmic resistance/Ω 1.03 0.96 R.sub.i Internal ohmic resistance/Ω 0.92 0.89 R.sub.k Kinetic resistance/Ω 1.67 1.67 R.sub.m Mass transfer impedance/Ω 4.95 0.67 C.sub.dl1 Double-layer capacitance/F 1.16 × 10.sup.−3 1.86 × 10.sup.−3 C.sub.dl2 Double-layer capacitance/F 3.22 × 10.sup.−4 1.90 × 10.sup.−4 C.sub.m Mass transfer impedance/F 2.27 × 10.sup.−5 2.01 × 10.sup.−4
[0065] In a further aspect,
[0066]
[0067]
[0068] In
[0069] As shown in Table 2 below, the consistency of the present catalyst was tested by comparing the onset potential using the RDE results for six batches of the FeCo—NPCNT catalyst:
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Batch No. Onset potential (vs. Ag/AgCl) 1 −0.103 2 −0.137 3 −0.114 4 −0.101 5 −0.137 6 −0.083 Std. Dev. 0.021 Average −0.113
[0070] The RDE results show that the different batches of FeCo—NPCNT catalysts, being morphology-dependent, had properties that are essentially the same.
[0071] In the method of making the catalysts, according to the present disclosure, the FeCo—NPCNTs catalyst can be synthesized either using powder CNTs or CNTs arrays on a substrate. The CNTs are straight or spirally shaped having, for example, average diameters in the range of about 10 to 20 nm, with an average wall thickness of 5-10 nm, and is mesoporous with a layer thickness of 7-8 μm. This structure's performance is created by a rough surface on CNTs with the self-assembling during the polymerization of phytic acid and aniline. The polyaniline doped with phytic acid is coated on CNTs using a wet chemistry method by mixing phytic acid and aniline the slowly adding in an oxidizing agent with stirring. The polyaniline can be replaced with polyvinyl alcohol and a nitrogen source (e.g., melamine or ammonia). The polyaniline and phytic acid roughen the surfaces of the CNTs for better deposition of Fe and Co.
[0072] As shown in
[0073] According to the present disclosure, the N and P co-doping and co-existence of Fe and Co atoms are crucial to the good performance of the FeCo—NPCNT catalyst. The presence of N and P ensures smaller size growth of the Fe and Co centers on the NPCNTs. In addition to Fe and Co, Ni and Mn can also be used, as well as mixtures thereof.
[0074]
[0075] In
[0076] As shown in
[0077] According to an aspect of the present disclosure, pyridinic or pyrrolic-N atoms form metal-N-coordinated moieties and stabilize the catalytic active center; especially for the space-confined M-N—C moieties in-between the adjacent layers of graphene provided by the uniform distribution of pyridinic N. In particular, the charge redistribution caused by N doping may render the C atom adjacent to the N atom to be positively charged, thus acting as the active site for ORR.
[0078]
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Element composition of NPFeCo900- VACNT-GF derived from survey scan. Element Peak Atomic % C.sub.1s 94.37 O.sub.1s 4.06 P.sub.2p 0.15 N.sub.1s 1.02 Fe.sub.2p 0.15 Co.sub.2p 0.25
[0079]
[0080] Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area analysis is a multi-point measurement of an analyte's specific surface area (m2/g) through gas adsorption analysis, where an inert gas (e.g., nitrogen) continuously flows over a solid sample, or the solid sample is suspended in a defined gaseous volume. Small gas molecules are adsorbed by the solid substrate and its porous structures due to weak van der Waals forces, forming a monolayer of adsorbed gas. This monomolecular layer, and the rate of adsorption, can be used to calculate the specific surface area of a solid sample and its porous geometry, informing studies into the reactivity.
[0081] In
[0082] According to an aspect of the present disclosure,
[0083]
[0084]
[0085]
[0086] As shown in
[0087]
[0088]
[0089]
[0090] According to another aspect of the present disclosure,
[0091] For typical Pt-based catalysts, the initial electron transfer is a rate-limiting step, which results in two linear regions with Tafel slopes of approximately 60 and 120 mV/dec. On the other hand, the Tafel slope of the FeCo—NPCNT suggests that the last electron transfer and the detachment of reaction products from the surface of the catalyst is the rate-limiting step with a Tafel slope of approximately 40 mV/dec. The FeCo—NPCNTs catalyst annealed at temperatures higher than 800° C. showed relatively good catalytic activity, while those annealed at 900° C. showed the highest onset potential.
[0092] In further aspects of the present disclosure,
[0093] According to the present disclosure, the CNT surface is rich in mesopores that improves the reaction volume and graphitic edges that further boosts the activity, resulting in the FeCo—NPCNT catalyst achieving a similar activity to commercial Pt/C and having a peak power density of 95 mW cm.sup.2, as compared with cells made with commercial Pt/C that have only 57 mW cm.sup.2. On the other hand, the FeCo—NPCNTs material has a cost of USD 130 to 150 per kg, which is similar to other multi-wall carbon nanotubes. which is only slightly higher than MnO.sub.2 and delivers a similar activity to Pt/C.
[0094] In Table 4 below, the activity of different catalysts may offer a basis for comparison with the present FeCo—NPCNT catalysts. It is worth noting, however, that many published results do not specify the conditions of testing, which makes comparison difficult given the performance of ZABs are very sensitive to the testing conditions; especially the concentration of oxygen that is present.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Performance of Other Catalysts Material Performance Cycle life Structure Condition N-VACNT-GF 63 mW cm.sup.−2 35 h Free- Ambient standing MOF-derived Co4N 135 mW cm.sup.−2 10 mA cm.sup.−2 at Free- Ambient carbon composite Voltage gap 0.84 V 20 min per cycle, 136 h standing Co-polydopamine- Voltage gap 0.94 V Over 500 cycles Powder Ambient carbon composite (500 h), voltage gap increased by 0.23 V Fe/Fe.sub.2O.sub.3@Fe—N—C— 1.01 V voltage gap 10 h Powder Not with ORR @ mentioned 3.0 mA .Math. cm.sup.−2 and OER @ 10 mA .Math. cm.sup.−2 Co.sub.3FeS.sub.1.5(OH).sub.6 113.1 mW cm.sup.−2 108 cycles 36 h@ Powder Not Voltage gap 0.86 V @ 2 mA cm.sup.−2 mentioned 20.0 mA cm.sup.−2 MnS/Co nanofiber Voltage gap 0.98 V @ 110 h Free- Ambient 10.0 mA cm.sup.−2 @10 mA cm.sup.−2 standing NiFeO@MnOx Voltage gap 0.56 V @ 100 pulse cycles Powder Not core-shell structures 2 ma cm.sup.−2 @ 2 ma cm.sup.−2 mentioned S, N—Fe/N/C-CNTs 102.7 mW cm.sup.−2 100 pulse cycles Powder Not @ 5 mA cm.sup.−2 mentioned Ni—Fe nitride Voltage gap 0.77 V @ 30 h Powder Pure oxygen nanoplates on 10 mA cm.sup.−2 N-doped graphene 3D ordered 73 mW cm.sup.−2 200 cycles (400 h) Powder Pure oxygen mesoporous Co.sub.3O.sub.4 @10 mA cm.sup.−2 Mesoporous Ni3FeN Round-trip After 310 cycles Powder Not microspheres efficiency 67.1% and (100 h), round-trip mentioned voltage gap 0.70 V efficiency 63.2% a FeCo nanoparticles 97.6 mW cm.sup.−2 40 h Powder Not in N-doped CNTs @ 100 mAcm.sup.−2 mentioned Cu—Co oxide 89.3 mW cm.sup.−2 48 h, discharge voltage Powder Not quantum dot on decreased by 0.03 V mentioned N-doped CNTs Fe/N/C and ZIF-67 235 mW cm.sup.−2, 16 hrs Powder Not derived material mentioned
[0095] The fabrication methods and the choice of materials above are intended to illustrative and nonlimiting. It will be apparent to those ordinary skilled practitioners that the foregoing process operations may be modified without departing from the spirit of the present disclosure.
[0096] According to the present disclosure, the VACNT-GF composite with Fe and Co-based single atom catalytical active centers provide useful free-standing electrodes for ZABs. The doped are prepared by annealing of transition metal precursors, phytic acid, and PANI on mildly oxidized CNTs. The resulting FeCo—NPCNTs samples have single atom Fe and Co sites anchored on the outer walls of N and P doped CNTs, which results in high utilization of the Fe and Co catalytic sites.
[0097] The electrochemical characterizations performed were able to access the catalytic activity of present catalyst samples. According to the present disclosure, the FeCo—NPCNTs samples annealed at 900° C. shows the best catalytic activity, and that the N and P co-doping and co-existence of Fe and Co atoms are crucial to the good performance of FeCo—NPCNTs samples. The FeCo—NPCNTs-9 shows significantly higher peak power density and better cycling performance than similarly prepared electrodes based on commercial materials due to their high conductivity, high surface area, and favorable mass transfer properties. The rechargeable ZAB may achieve a stable operation of over 285 hours and 590 cycles, while the Pt/C//IrO2 cells achieved much less operational time. In conclusion, the FeCo—NPCNTs-9 is a highly effective single-atom catalyst for OER and ORR and shows excellent performance as a free-standing electrode for rechargeable ZABs with high power and energy densities and long cycle life.
[0098] It will be understood that any property described herein for a specific device may also hold for any device described herein. It will also be understood that any property described herein for a specific method may hold for any of the methods described herein. Furthermore, it will be understood that for any device or method described herein, not necessarily all the components or operations described will be enclosed in the device or method, but only some (but not all) components or operations may be enclosed.
[0099] The term “comprising” shall be understood to have a broad meaning similar to the term “including” and will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or operation or group of integers or operations but not the exclusion of any other integer or operation or group of integers or operations. This definition also applies to variations on the term “comprising” such as “comprise” and “comprises”.
[0100] While the present disclosure has been particularly shown and described with reference to specific aspects, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure as defined by the appended claims. The scope of the present disclosure is thus indicated by the appended claims and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced.