SCREENING METHOD

Abstract

This invention relates to a novel screening method that identifies simple molecular markers that are predictive of whether a particular disease condition is responsive to a specific treatment. Also, a method of diagnosing the susceptibility of an individual suffering from a disease to treatment with an HDAC inhibitor is provided. Also provided is a method of treating a proliferative disease or a condition which involves a change in cell differentiation or growth rate in a patient.

Claims

1.-17. (canceled)

18. A method of diagnosing the susceptibility of an individual suffering from cancer to treatment with an HDAC inhibitor, the method comprising assessing the level of expression or activity of a gene's expression product in a sample from a patient and comparing said level of expression or activity to a reference, wherein a level of expression or activity that is different to said reference is indicative of an altered susceptibility to treatment with the HDAC inhibitor relative to the reference state, wherein said gene is Myd88 (myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88), wherein the expression product is a protein, and wherein the protein is detected by an antibody that binds specifically to the Myd88 protein, and wherein the sample comprises tumor cells.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein a level that is significantly higher than the reference level indicates that the individual is more susceptible to treatment with an HDAC inhibitor, and wherein if a significantly higher level is detected then the method further comprises referring the patient for treatment with the HDAC inhibitor.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein the method further comprises treating said patient with an HDAC inhibitor if they are found to be susceptible to treatment with an HDAC inhibitor.

21. The method of claim 18, wherein a level that is significantly lower than the reference level is indicative of an individual's potential resistance to treatment with the HDAC inhibitor.

22. The method of claim 18, wherein the Myd88 gene is a nucleic acid molecule, which: (a) comprises a Myd88 sequence recited in accession number NM 002468; or (b) is a fragment of a sequence according to (a).

23. The method of claim 18, wherein the expression product is a protein, which: (a) has an amino acid sequence encoded by a nucleic acid sequence of claim 22(a); or (b) is a fragment of a protein according to (a), provided that said fragment retains a biological activity possessed by the full length polypeptide of (a) of acting as an adaptor molecule involved in Toll receptor family signaling, or has an antigenic determinant in common with the polypeptide of (a).

24. The method of claim 18, wherein the method of diagnosis is facilitated by an array comprising at least two different types of antibody species, wherein each antibody species is immunospecific with a Myd88 protein.

25. The method of claim 18, wherein said sample is a tissue sample.

26. The method of claim 25, wherein said sample is blood, urine, saliva, or a specific tissue biopsy.

27. A kit for diagnosing the susceptibility of an individual suffering from a disease to treatment with an HDAC inhibitor comprising: (a) one or more antibodies that binds to Myd88; and (b) a reagent useful for the detection of a binding reaction between the antibody and the protein.

28. A method of diagnosing the susceptibility of an individual suffering from a disease to treatment with an HDAC inhibitor, the method comprising assessing the level of expression of a gene or the sequence of a gene in a sample from a patient and comparing said level of expression or sequence to a reference, wherein a level of expression or sequence that is different to said reference is indicative of an altered susceptibility to treatment with the HDAC inhibitor relative to the reference state, and wherein said gene is Myd88 (myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88), wherein the method comprises the steps of: (a) isolating a nucleic acid molecule encoding Myd88 from a sample from a patient being tested for disease; and (b) diagnosing the patient by detecting the presence of a mutation which is associated with an altered susceptibility to treatment with the HDAC inhibitor, or wherein the method comprises the steps of: (i) contacting a sample of tissue from the patient with a nucleic acid probe under stringent conditions that allow the formation of a hybrid complex between a nucleic acid molecule coding for Myd88 and the probe; (ii) contacting a reference sample with the probe under the same conditions used in step (i); and (iii) detecting the presence of hybrid complexes in said samples.

29. A method of diagnosing the susceptibility of an individual suffering from cancer to treatment with an HDAC inhibitor, the method comprising assessing the level of expression or activity of a gene or its expression products, or the sequence of a gene, in a sample from a patient and comparing said level of expression or activity or sequence to a reference, wherein a level of expression or activity or sequence that is different to said reference is indicative of an altered susceptibility to treatment with the HDAC inhibitor relative to the reference state, wherein said gene is Myd88 (myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88), and wherein the disease is cancer, and wherein the sample comprises tumor cells.

30. A method of diagnosing the susceptibility of an individual suffering from cancer to treatment with an HDAC inhibitor, the method comprising assessing the level of expression or activity of a gene or its expression products, or the sequence of a gene, in a sample from a patient and comparing said level of expression or activity or sequence to a reference, wherein a level of expression or activity or sequence that is different to said reference is indicative of an altered susceptibility to treatment with the HDAC inhibitor relative to the reference state, and wherein said gene is Myd88 (myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88), wherein a level that is significantly higher than the reference level indicates that the individual is more susceptible to treatment with an HDAC inhibitor, and wherein if a significantly higher level is detected then the method further comprises treating said patient with an HDAC inhibitor, and wherein the sample comprises tumor cells.

31. The method of claim 28, wherein the method of diagnosis is facilitated by an array comprising at least two nucleic acid molecules, wherein each of said nucleic acid molecules corresponds to the sequence of, is complementary to the sequence of, or hybridises specifically to a Myd88 nucleic acid molecule.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

[0078] FIGS. 1A and 1B show a summary of functional knockdown screen results.

A) Outline of shRNA screening strategy
B) Colonies isolated in the functional screen.

[0079] FIGS. 2A and 2B show genes identified in the knockdown HDAC inhibitor screen. (A) PCR amplification of pRetroSuper inserts from genomic DNA of isolated colonies and BLASTn search of resulting sequence allowed identification of genes knocked down in SAHA-resistant colonies. These genes were then prioritized according to likelihood of involvement in the cell cycle according to information from literature database searches.

(B) Main function, localization and associated proteins of high probability group of SAHA-sensitivity genes.

[0080] FIG. 3 shows the effect of shRNA from pRetroSuper on target genes. Western blot analysis of screen cell extracts from cells expanded from single surviving colonies to determine knockdown off the genes in high priority group identified via the presence of the shRNA insert.

[0081] FIGS. 4A and 4B show a comparison of stable versus transient knockdown. (A) Two knockdown vectors against hHR23B (HI and HII) along with a short hairpin siRNA containing the pRetroSuper insert sequence were transiently transfected into U2OS cells for 48 or 72 hours to determine if similar levels of knockdown could be produced compared to control siRNA. (B) Two knockdown vectors were produced against RFC-1 (A and B) along with a short hairpin siRNA containing the pRetroSuper insert sequence were transiently transfected into U2OS cells for 48 hours. Levels of both genes were then compared to the levels of knockdown observed in the cells isolated from the screen. PCNA was used as a loading control. NS=non-specific pRetroSuper, pRS=pRetroSuper.

[0082] FIGS. 5A and 5B show the effect of synthetic siRNA RFC1 on HDAC inhibitor sensitivity. A) U2OS cells were treated with siRNA RFC1 followed by SAHA (as described) and the level of sub-G1 (apoptotic) cells measured. The data represent the percentage change in the sub-G1 fraction, in which the control treatment siRNA lamin was set to 100%. B) U2OS cells treated as indicated were immuno-blotted with anti-RFC1 or antilamin A/C.

EXAMPLES

Materials and Methods

Cell Culture and Transfection.

[0083] Cells were cultured in DMEM (MCF7, U2OS and SAOS2) or RPMI-40 (A2780) containing 10% FCS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco). U2OS cells were transfected with synthesised short hairpin siRNAs (Dharmacon) as indicated using oligofectamine (Invitrogen) to a final concentration of 100 nM before harvesting.

FACS Analysis.

[0084] Cells were fixed in 50% ethanol/PBS overnight at 4° C. and incubated for 30 min with 1×RNAse A and 20 ng/ml propidium iodide. Samples were run on a FACScan flow cytometer (BD Bioscience) and analysed using CellQuestPro software.

pRetroSuper RNAi Knockdown Screen.

[0085] U2OS cells expressing the murine ectropic receptor (U2OSEcR) were infected with the pRetroSuper RNAi library (Brummelkamp et al, 2002a/b). Each pool of the library contained 100 siRNAs per well. Cells were allowed to recover for up to 72 hours to allow for siRNA expression and knockdown and were then plated overnight (40,000 cells per plate). 2μÌ SAHA was then added to each plate (cell number and SAHA concentration were determined prior to the screen). SAHA containing media was then replaced every 3 days for 18-30 days until the appearance of colonies on plates co-treated with SAHA and the viral library. Colonies were then picked and expanded to allow isolation of total genomic DNA and total protein (FIG. 1).

DNA Isolation, PCR and Gene Identification.

[0086] Genomic DNA was isolated from colony cells using lysis buffer (100 mM Tris pH8.5, 0.2% SDS, 200 mM NaCl and 100 μg/ml proteinase K) and left at 37° C. for 30 minutes with shaking to allow DNA to precipitate. One volume of isopropanol was then added to the lysate and the DNA precipitate dissolved in 10 mM Tris pH7.5, allowing it to be used in PCR to determine the identity of the gene in question. PCR was carried out using the Expand Long Template PCR System (Roche). The genomic insert was recovered by using the primers: pRS forward: 5′-CCCTTGGAACCTCCTCGTTCGACC-3′ and pRS reverse: 5′-CAGACGTGCTACTTCCATTTGTC-3′. Each PCR was analysed on 1.2% 1×TBE/Agarose gel. The PCR product was then sequenced (Lark Technologies) to allow the gene of interest to be identified.

Immunoblotting.

[0087] Cells were washed with PBS and lysed in TNN lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8, 120 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and protease inhibitors) at 4° C. for 20 min. The extracts were centrifuged at 16,000 g for 10 min to remove cell debris. Cell lysate was normalised (Bradford assay) and equal protein loading was confirmed with Ponceau S staining. Total protein was resolved by denaturing SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) before electrotransfer to Protran nitrocellulose membrane, and subsequently probed with antibody. The antibodies used were RFC-1, MYD88, LIF, LIFR and hnRNPI (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and hHR23B (Biomol). Enhanced chemi-luminescence (Pierce) was used to visualize antibody binding.

1. A Functional Knock-Down Screen for Drug Sensitivity Genes.

[0088] The shRNA knock-down screen (Brummelkamp et al, 2002a) involves the use of an shRNA (in pRetroSuper) library targeting greater than 8,000 human genes and contains three shRNA expressing vectors for each gene. The siRNAs produced from the shRNAs induce a strong and specific suppression of gene expression (Brummelkamp et al., 2002a, b) and the stable expression of siRNAs using pRetroSuper mediates suppression of gene expression over prolonged periods of time. This allows the analysis of loss-of-function phenotypes in long term assays.

[0089] We refined the screen to enable the identification of genes necessary for HDAC-inhibitor induced apoptosis to be identified. The rationale behind the screen is that the knock-down of genes required for HDAC inhibitor induced apoptosis would allow cells to proliferate and grow in the presence of the HDAC inhibitor (FIG. 1). These cells can then be isolated, the identity of the knock-down genes determined and, thereafter, the role of the genes validated in functional assays. From 132 colonies, about 25 produced DNA sequence that enabled the identity of the target genes to be determined (this may result from cells becoming infected with more than one virus shRNA construct). The genes targeted by the siRNA (FIG. 2A) were arbitrarily divided into three groups based on the likelihood that they were involved in pathways involved with proliferation control; the key features of the genes are summarized in FIG. 2B.

[0090] To confirm that the gene identified via the shRNA DNA sequence was in fact knocked-down, the expression level of certain of the encoded proteins was investigated. Almost complete knock-down was observed in the case of the LIF receptor and RFC1, whilst partial knockdown was observed in the case of MYD88, hnRNP I and hHR23B (for LIF, the quality of the antibody was very poor, and an antibody was not available to PP4R1, so these two genes could not be finally validated). RT-PCR was also carried out using gene specific primers to determine the RNA levels of these genes in cells containing the pRetroSuper insert (FIG. 3A).

[0091] The sequence within the pRetroSuper vector was compared to that of synthetic siRNAs targeting the same sequence as the pRetroSuper insert. Two other synthetic siRNAs derived from other regions of the RNA and previously shown to cause knockdown of RFC-1 and hHR23B were also investigated (Anderson and Perkins, 2003; Glockzin et al, 2003). For hHR23B the siRNA sequence taken from the pRetroSuper vector produced efficient knock-down when introduced as an siRNA after 48 hours, whilst two other synthetic unrelated sequences targeting hHR23B RNA (HI and HID also produced efficient knockdown (FIGS. 4A and 4B). The level of knock-down produced by the hHR23B shRNA after 48 hours treatment was comparable to that of the stable knock-down cells. Knock-down of RFC-1 by the two other sequences (RA and RB) was very efficient after 48 hours whereas the synthetic siRNA against the sequence from the pRetroSuper insert did not cause knockdown after 48 hours treatment (FIGS. 4A and 4B). The level of knock-down by the shRNAs A and B was comparable to that of the stable cell lines from the screen. The discrepancies between the level of knock-down could be a result of the different mechanisms, as an siRNA may be more or less effective depending on the method of delivery (for example transient versus stable expression).

[0092] In order to validate the role of the genes identified through the screen in regulating sensitivity to HDAC inhibition, we assessed the effect of knock-down on HDAC inhibition. Considering Rad23B and RFC1, the introduction of siRNAs against distinct regions of each gene reduced the sensitivity of U2OS cells to HDAC inhibitor-induced apoptosis (FIGS. 5A and 5B). For siRNA RFC1, the reduction in the level of apoptosis was very significant, reaching as high as 35%. The effect of siRNA RFC1 thus validates the approach as a platform to identify genes that influence sensitivity to HDAC inhibitors.

[0093] Importantly, the platform can now be applied to other types of drugs, particularly where the cessation of cellular proliferation is the outcome of the drug treatment. The pathways involved in HDAC inhibitor mediated apoptosis are most likely to be quite diverse but through the functional siRNA knock-down screen described here it has been possible to identify the critical regulatory pathways affected by HDAC inhibitors and necessary for the apoptotic outcome.

[0094] It is possible that the proteins identified through the knock-down screen are themselves modified by acetylation, or alternatively interact with other proteins subject to acetylation control, allowing them to be modified and function in pathways required for apoptosis. Elucidating the role of these novel effector proteins may identify essential pathways which are targeted by HDAC inhibitors and necessary for the induction of apoptosis. Equally, these genes could encode biomarkers which allow tumours to be stratified into groupings that are likely to undergo more favourable responses to HDAC inhibitors. Most importantly, the screening strategy described here is generally applicable in that it can be applied to cancer drugs against other targets.

REFERENCES

[0095] Anderson L A and Perkins N D. (2003) Regulation of RelA (p65) function by the large subunit of replication factor C. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23 (2) 721-732. [0096] BedalovA, Gatbonton T, Irvine W P, Gotschling D E, and Simon J A. (2001) Identification of a small moleculae inhibitor of Sir2p. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98, 15113-15118. [0097] Brummelkamp, T. R., Bernards, R., and Agami, R. (2002a). Stable suppression of tumorigenicity by virus-mediated RNA interference. Cancer Cell 2, 243-247. [0098] Brummelkamp, T. R., Bernards, R., and Agami, R. (2002b). A system for stable expression of short interfering RNAs in mammalian cells. Science 296, 550-553. [0099] Butler L M, Zhou X, Xu W-S, Scher H I, Rifkind R A, Marks P A and Richon V M. (2002). The histone deacetylase inhibitor SAHA arrests cancer cells growth, upregulates thioredoxin-binding protein-2 and down-regulates thioredoxin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99, (18) 11700-5. [0100] Della Ragione F, Criniti V, Della Pietra V, Borriello A, Oliva A, Indaco S, Yamamoto T, Zappia V. (2001) Genes modulated by histone acetylation as new effectors of butyrate activity. FEBS Letters 499, (3) 199-204 [0101] Dyson, N. (1998). The regulation of E2F by pRb-family proteins. Genes Dev. 12, 2245-2262. [0102] Glaser K B, Stayer M J, Waring J F, Stender J, Ulrich R G and Davidson Sk (2003). Gene expression profiling of multiple histone deacetylase (HDAC inhibitors: defining a common gene set produced by HDAC inhibition in T24 and MDA carcinoma cell lines. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2, 151-163. [0103] Glockzin S, Ogi F-X, Hengstermann A, Scheffer M and Blattner C (2003). Involvement of the DNA repair protein hHR23 in p53 degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23 (24) 8960-969. [0104] Grozinger C M, Chao E D, Blackwell H E, Moazed D and Schreiber S L. (2001). Identification of a class of small molecular inhibitors of the sirtuin family of NAD-dependent deacetylases by phenotypic screening. J. Biol. Chem 276 (42) 38837-38843 [0105] Inche, A. and La Thangue, N. B. (2006) Chromatin control and cancer drug discovery: realising the promise. Drug Discovery Today (in press). [0106] Jacobson, S. & Pilius, L. (1999). Modifying chromatin and concepts of cancer. Curr. Op. Genet. Dev. 9, 175-184. [0107] Johnstone, R. W. (2002). Histone deacetylase inhibitors: novel drugs for treatment of cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug. Disc. 1, 287-299. [0108] Johnstone R W. (2002) Histone-deacetylase inhibitors: novel drugs for the treatment of cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 4:287-99. [0109] Liang P and Pardee A B (2003). Analysing differential gene expression in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 869-876. [0110] McLaughlin, F. & LaThangue, N. B. (2002). Tumour classification for tailored cancer therapy. Ann. Rep. in Med. Chem. 37, (Ch 23) 225-233. [0111] McLaughlin, F. and La Thangue, N. B. (2003). Histone deacetylase inhibitors in psoriasis therapy. Inflammation and Allergy. 3, 213-219. [0112] Marks P A, Richon V M, Breslow R, Rifkind R A. (2001) Histone deacetylase inhibitors as new cancer drugs. Curr Opin Oncol. 6 477-83. [0113] Mitsiades C S Mitsiades N S, McMullan C J, Poulaki V, Shringarpue R, Hideshima T, Akiyama M, Chauhn D, Munshi N, Gu X, Bailey C, Joseph M, Libermann T A, Richon V M, Marks P A and Anderson K C. (2004). Transcriptional signature of histone deacetylase inhibition in multiple myeloma: biological and clinical applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101 (2) 540-545. [0114] Suzuki H, Gabrielson E, Chen W, Anbazhagan R, van Engelend M, Weijenberg M P, Herman J G abd Baylin S. (2002). A genomewide screen for genes upregulated by demethylation and histone deacetylase inhibiton in human colorectal cancer. Nat Genetics 31 (2) 141-149. [0115] Van Lint C, Emiliani S, Verdin E. (1996) The expression of a small fraction of cellular genes is changed in response to histone hyperacetylation. Gene Expression. 5 (4-5) 245-53. [0116] Vaziri, H., Dessain, S. K., Ng Eaton, E., Imai, S-I., Frye, R. A., Pandita, T. K., Guarente, L. & Weinberg, R. (2001). hSIR2 (SIRT1) Functions as an NAD-dependent p53 deacetylase. Cell 107, 149-159.