Photocatalytic Composition for Water Purification

Abstract

The present invention refers to lightweight and settable photocatalytic compositions and solid composites; methods of preparing the compositions and solid composites; and their use in water purification. The compositions are comprised of photocatalysts such as titanium dioxide (TiO.sub.2) and zinc oxide (ZnO), lightweight glass bubbles, and a hydraulic cementing binder. The lightweight and settable photocatalytic compositions can be formed into lightweight photocatalytic solid composites and/or structures by mixing with water and moist curing. This invention also describes relatively simple, fast, and cost effective methodologies to photodope the TiO.sub.2—ZnO compositions and composites with silver (Ag), to enhance and extend the photocatalytic activity from the ultraviolet into the visible light spectrum. The lightweight and settable TiO.sub.2—ZnO and Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO compositions are used in making solids, structures, coatings, and continuous or semi-continuous water purification panels for purifying contaminated water.

Claims

1-14. (canceled)

15. A composition comprising: one or more photocatalysts selected from TiO.sub.2, ZnO, WO.sub.3, Cu.sub.2O, SnO.sub.2, SiO.sub.2, RuO.sub.2, SrTiO.sub.3, Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, NiO, and SiC; one or more glass bubbles; and a cementing binder.

16. The composition of claim 15, wherein the photocatalyst is TiO.sub.2, ZnO, or a mixture of both.

17. The composition of claim 15, further comprising one or more metals and non-metals selected from N, C, S, P, B, F, I, Cu, Ag, Pt, Pd, Mn, Wo, Ni, Sn, Fe, and V.

18. The composition of claim 17, wherein the photocatalyst is a complex comprising Ag, TiO.sub.2, and ZnO.

19. The composition of claim 17, wherein the composition comprises a metal; the metal is Ag; and the metal coats the surface of the composition.

20. The composition of claim 15, wherein the glass bubbles are hollow and transparent to UV and visible light, and comprise sodium silicate, aluminosilicate or borosilicate glass.

21. The composition of claim 15, wherein the cementing binder is selected from Portland cement and blended hydraulic cements.

22. The composition of claim 15, wherein the photocatalyst is a mixture of ZnO and TiO.sub.2, and the proportions by weight of ZnO:TiO.sub.2:glass bubbles:cementing binder is in the ratio of 1:4:25:100.

23. The composition of claim 15, wherein the composition comprises TiO.sub.2, ZnO, Ag, soda-lime-borosilicate glass bubbles and Portland cement.

24. A container having a horizontal bottom surface and one or more vertical surfaces connected perpendicularly thereto to form an opening, and a solid composition inserted into the opening; wherein the solid composition comprises one or more photocatalysts selected from TiO.sub.2, ZnO, WO.sub.3, Cu.sub.2O, SnO.sub.2, SiO.sub.2, RuO.sub.2, SrTiO.sub.3, Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, NiO, and SiC; one or more glass bubbles; and a cementing binder.

25. The container of claim 24, wherein the bottom surface and one or more vertical surfaces are transparent to UV and visible light.

26. A water purification system, comprising one or more tubes positioned in front of a light source and optionally interconnected in a series with elbow shaped tube connectors; and one or more parabolic trough reflectors positioned behind the one or more tubes such that the light is focused on the tubes; wherein the tubes contain one or more solid compositions; each solid composition comprises one or more photocatalysts selected from TiO.sub.2, ZnO, WO.sub.3, Cu.sub.2O, SnO.sub.2, SiO.sub.2, RuO.sub.2, SrTiO.sub.3, Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, NiO, and SiC; one or more glass bubbles; and a cementing binder; the first tube has an inlet for the entry of water; and the last tube has an outlet for the exit of water, where the outlet optionally has a valve to control water flow.

27. The system of claim 26, wherein the tubes are transparent to UV and visible light and comprise polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified, acrylic or glass.

28. The system of claim 26, wherein each tube contains one or more solid compositions shaped as spheres, cubes, or cylinders that are positioned throughout the length of the tube.

29. A method of preparing a composition, comprising a) combining one or more photocatalysts selected from TiO.sub.2, ZnO, WO.sub.3, Cu.sub.2O, SnO.sub.2, SiO.sub.2, RuO.sub.2, SrTiO.sub.3, Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, NiO, and SiC; b) adding glass bubbles and mixing to obtain a first mixture; c) adding a cementing binder and water, then mixing to obtain a second mixture; d) optionally adding one or more metals and non-metals selected from N, C, S, P, B, F, I, Cu, Ag, Pt, Pd, Mn, Wo, Ni, Sn, Fe, and V; and e) obtaining the composition.

30. The method of claim 29, wherein the first mixture and/or the second mixture is homogeneous.

31. The method of claim 29, wherein the one or more metals and non-metals are added into the second mixture and then the mixture is allowed to solidify.

32. The method of claim 29, wherein the second mixture is allowed to solidify prior to addition of one or more metals and non-metals.

33. The method of claim 29, wherein the one or more metals and non-metals are coated on the solid surface of the second mixture.

34. The method of claim 33, wherein an AgNO.sub.3 solution is coated on the solid surface to obtain the composition; the composition is exposed to sunlight; and the composition is calcined at a temperature of 200° C. to 500° C. for a period of 1-3 hours.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0021] FIG. 1 shows a flow chart illustrating the separate steps for synthesizing the lightweight and settable TiO.sub.2—ZnO photocatalytic composition.

[0022] FIG. 2 shows a flow chart illustrating the separate steps for synthesizing the lightweight and settable Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO photocatalytic composition.

[0023] FIG. 3 shows a flow chart illustrating the separate steps for synthesizing the lightweight TiO.sub.2—ZnO photocatalytic solid composite.

[0024] FIG. 4 shows a flow chart illustrating the separate steps for synthesizing the lightweight Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO photocatalytic solid composite.

[0025] FIG. 5A is a perspective view of various substrates or solids that are coated with the lightweight and settable photocatalytic composition.

[0026] FIG. 6 is a side view of cylindrical photocatalytic rod made with the lightweight and settable photocatalytic composition, immersed in water inside a PET water bottle.

[0027] FIG. 7 illustrates the schematics of a water tank coated with the lightweight and settable photocatalytic composition.

[0028] FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a water purification panel made using the lightweight photocatalytic composite spheres placed in UV and visible light transparent tubes, and parabolic trough reflectors to concentrate sunlight on the photocatalytic composite.

[0029] FIG. 9 displays the SEM and EDS results for the lightweight TiO.sub.2—ZnO photocatalytic solid composite.

[0030] FIG. 10 displays the SEM and EDS results for the lightweight Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO photocatalytic solid composite.

[0031] FIG. 11 shows a graphical illustration of the average number of Enterobacteriacea counts at various time intervals for the control, TiO.sub.2—ZnO and Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO solid composites exposed to sunlight, visible light, and in the dark.

[0032] FIG. 12 shows a graphical illustration of the average number of aerobic bacteria counts at various time intervals for the control, TiO.sub.2—ZnO and Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO solid composites exposed to sunlight, visible light, and in the dark.

[0033] FIG. 13 illustrates the mechanism of forming reactive oxygen species as a result of UV-A activated photocatalysis of the TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite.

[0034] FIG. 14 illustrates the enhanced photocatalytic activity of the Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite and the formation of a greater number of reactive oxygen species as a result of the synergistic effects of UV-Vis photocatalysis.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0035] As we strive for a green and environmentally-friendly world, conventional techniques for water purification must move towards green and sustainable alternatives. Realizing this need for eco-friendly, sustainable, cost-effective, and efficient water purification systems, the inventor has developed lightweight and settable photocatalytic compositions, comprised of photocatalysts, hollow glass bubbles, and a hydraulic cementing binder. The inventor has also developed methods to deploy and use the lightweight and settable photocatalytic composition in systems for purifying water.

[0036] The photocatalyst used in the lightweight and settable composition may be either a single photocatalyst or combination of photocatalysts, which are selected from materials such as TiO.sub.2, ZnO, WO.sub.3, Cu.sub.2O, SnO.sub.2, SiO.sub.2, RuO.sub.2, SrTiO.sub.3, Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, NiO, SiC, and the like, that when subjected to light, results in transition of electrons from the valence band to the conduction band of the material, thereby leaving holes in the valence band. These electrons and holes participate in advanced oxidation and reduction reactions. The photocatalysts used in the lightweight and settable composition may also include non-metals and metals such as N, C, S, P, B, F, I, Cu, Ag, Pt, Pd, Mn, Wo, Ni, Sn, Fe, V and the like, or their oxides as dopants, to enhance and extend its photocatalytic activity from the ultraviolet into the visible light spectrum.

[0037] The glass bubbles used in the present invention include all types of commercially available glass bubbles or hollow glass microspheres that are typically made of sodium silicate, aluminosilicate, or borosilicate materials. The glass bubbles are transparent to UV and visible light and have sizes ranging from 100 nanometers to 5 millimeters in diameter. The glass bubbles used in the lightweight and settable photocatalytic composition of the present invention had median particle size ranging from 15 microns to 70 microns. Glass bubbles of any other size range may also be used. The glass bubbles are hollow and light weight, with densities ranging from 0.1 to 0.7 g/cc. Hence, by increasing or decreasing the amount of glass bubbles in the composition, they are useful in creating solid photocatalytic composites that can be made to float or sink in water. The inclusion of glass bubbles in the photocatalytic composition also increases the flow of the dry photocatalytic composition and also increases the workability of the mixture as water is added to the photocatalytic composition in order to prepare solid composites. This increase in workability as measured by the slump test (as described in ASTM C143/C143M) assists in easy placement, compaction, and coating.

[0038] The settable hydraulic cementing binder in the lightweight and settable photocatalytic composition commonly comprises of all types of Portland cements, blended hydraulic cements, performance based hydraulic cements, special cements, and combinations thereof. When water is added to the cement, it chemically reacts with the hydraulic binding material in a reaction known as hydration, and results in a paste that sets and hardens with time. This property allows cement to be used as a binding material in the manufacture or production of concrete.

[0039] Lightweight and Settable Photocatalytic Composition: The invention also provides a method for preparing a light weight and settable photocatalytic composition, in which the proportions by weight of ZnO:TiO.sub.2:glass bubbles:cementing binder, is for example in the ratio of 1:4:25:100. Various other photocatalysts and mixing ratios can be used as long as the composition retains its photocatalytic properties. In general, the photocatalytic activity increases with the type and amount of photocatalyst in the lightweight and settable photocatalytic composition. The method for preparing the lightweight and settable photocatalytic composition (FIG. 1) comprises proportioning, mixing and blending the photocatalysts in pre-determined ratios (if there are more than one photocatalyst, such as ZnO and TiO.sub.2). This is followed by the addition of the pre-determined amount of lightweight glass bubbles, and mixing by mechanical means such as hand agitation or rolling in a horizontal ball mill, wherein the glass bubbles also act as tiny balls in the rotating ball mill, resulting in a homogenous mixture of photocatalysts and glass bubbles. A predetermined amount of hydraulic cementing binder is added next and the mechanical mixing is continued for 5 to 10 minutes, until a homogenous lightweight and settable photocatalytic composition is formed (for example a lightweight and settable TiO.sub.2—ZnO composition of the present invention).

[0040] Doping TiO.sub.2 with Ag is known to extend the photocatalytic range of TiO.sub.2, from UV into the visible light spectrum. Ag is also a well-known bactericide that can aid in water purification. The inventor developed a relatively simple, fast, and cost effective methodology, to synthesize a novel lightweight and settable UV-Vis photocatalytic composition (Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO) by photodoping the TiO.sub.2—ZnO composition described earlier. The doping process of this invention (FIG. 2), referred to as photodoping, comprises mixing the photocatalysts and/or photocatalytic composition with a metal salt solution, such as 0.1M AgNO.sub.3, and then exposing this to the sun. This is followed by calcining the Ag doped photocatalysts or photocatalytic composition at temperatures between 200° C. and 500° C. for a period of 1 to 3 hours. The lightweight and settable photocatalytic composition may further comprise additives or admixtures typically used in cement mortar or cement concrete for rapid hardening, improve workability, air entrainment, or color. The photodoping method described in this invention is fast, simple and cost effective compared to the time consuming and arduous sol-gel techniques reported in literature. Lightweight Photocatalytic Solid Composite: This lightweight and settable photocatalytic composition may be used as an additive for dry or wet mortar formulation. The photocatalytic composition may be mixed with water to form a paste for coating photocatalytically active surfaces, or for binding aggregates together in the production or manufacture of concrete. When water is added to the photocatalytic composition, it chemically reacts with the hydraulic binding material in a reaction known as hydration, resulting in a paste that sets and hardens with time. The hardening and strength gain with time requires moisture curing for a period of 7 to 28 days or even more, depending on the type of hydraulic cementing binder used in the formulation. After hardening, the photocatalysts are tightly bound to the solid photocatalytic composite, and do not wash-off after repeated use. The amount of water to be added is commonly referred as the “water-cementitious materials ratio” or simply as the “water-cement ratio”. It is the ratio of the mass of water to mass of hydraulic cementing binder. The water-cement ratio to be used depends on the particular application and the desired properties of the hardened concrete; it is typically kept between 0.40 and 0.50 for engineering construction. High water-cement ratio results in low strength of hardened concrete. However, if the water-cement ratio is too low, the workability is reduced and it becomes difficult to mix, place and compact the fresh concrete. The inclusion of glass bubbles in the photocatalytic composition, improves the workability of mortar or fresh concrete, and thereby enables the use of low water-cement ratio (below 0.40) without impacting strength.

[0041] To prepare the lightweight TiO.sub.2—ZnO photocatalytic solid composites (FIG. 3), the lightweight and settable photocatalytic composition is mixed with water at the appropriate water-cement ratio (and optionally mixed with other aggregates such as sand and gravel). The resulting mix is placed and compacted in molds or of any desired shape or form (spherical, cubical, cylindrical etc.). The mixture is the allowed to set and harden with time. This time may vary from 7 to 28 days or even more, depending on the hydraulic cementing binder used. After setting and hardening a lightweight solid photocatalytic composite is formed. By increasing or decreasing the amount of the light weight (density 0.2 g/cc) glass bubbles in the composition, the lightweight solid photocatalytic composite could be made to float (composite density <1.0 g/cc), or sink (composite density >1.0 g/cc) in water.

[0042] The invention also provides a relatively simple, fast, and cost effective methodology, to synthesize lightweight, Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO photocatalytic solid composites (FIG. 4) by surface-doping the lightweight TiO.sub.2—ZnO photocatalytic solid composite (described earlier) with minute amounts of Ag (<1 wt %), only on the surface. The method for surface doping involves, spraying, brushing or coating by any other means the surface of the lightweight TiO.sub.2—ZnO photocatalytic solid composites with a metal salt solution, such as 0.1M AgNO.sub.3, and exposing it to the sun. The photocatalytic composite turns dark as Ag gets photoreduced onto the surface of the composite. The Ag doped composite is further calcined at temperatures between 200° C. and 500° C. for a period of 1 to 3 hours, to form the lightweight Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO photocatalytic solid composite.

Applications:

[0043] The lightweight photocatalytic solid composites developed in this research can be easily deployed in several different ways to avoid the drawbacks of conventional TiO.sub.2 enhanced SODIS methods (namely the blocking of UV rays and washing off after repeated use). In one embodiment, various substrates or solids can be coated with the lightweight and settable photocatalytic compositions (FIG. 5) and may be placed in contact with contaminated water in vessels or containers that are transparent to UV and visible light (such as PET water bottles), and exposed to sunlight or artificial, until the contaminated water is purified (FIG. 6).

[0044] In another embodiment, lightweight photocatalytic concrete water tanks may be constructed with the lightweight and settable photocatalytic composition mixed with concrete, or existing water tanks can be coated with the lightweight and settable photocatalytic composition (FIG. 7). Contaminated water may then be treated in the photocatalytic tanks by exposure to sunlight (or artificial light) to purify water, before use, or even before being discharged to lakes, streams, rivers and other water bodies. This could reduce the use of harsh chemicals for treating water. In yet another embodiment, the lightweight photocatalytic solid composite may be deployed in a continuous or semi-continuous water purification system that could be built as a small residential point-of-use system, or built on a larger scale for batch water purification (FIG. 8). A photocatalytic water purification panel is constructed out of UV and visible light transparent tubes 1 such as Polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PETG), acrylic, glass, or any other tubes that are transparent to UV and visible light. The tubes may be interconnected in series using elbows and connectors 2. The lightweight photocatalytic solid composites 3 (spheres, cubes, cylinders or of any size, shape or form) are placed in the tubes; parabolic trough reflectors 4 made of solar reflector film may be used to concentrate sunlight on the photocatalytic composite contained in the tubes. The tubes are filled with contaminated water through the inlet 5 and are exposed to sunlight until the water is purified by photocatalysis. The water purification panel can be built large enough to treat water in a batch process. The water purification panel may be filled with a new batch of contaminated water and the purification process can be continued. For a continuous flow water purification system, the flow rate can be reduced by a flow control valve 6 so that water remains in the system for a sufficient amount of time, until purified.

Examples

[0045] Materials: The raw materials used in synthesizing the photocatalytic composites were commercially available Portland cement, K.sub.2O glass bubbles having soda-lime-borosilicate glass composition from 3M Center, TiO.sub.2 Degussa (P-25) with 80% anatase and 20% rutile crystal structure, ZnO and AgNO.sub.3 from Fisher Scientific. The synthesized photocatalytic composites were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) using a field-emission scanning electron microscope. Enterobacteriaceae and aerobic bacteria counts were determined using 3M Petrifilms. 3M Solar Mirror Film-1100 was used in the fabrication of the prototype photocatalytic water purification panel.

[0046] A lightweight and settable photocatalytic composition was prepared using two photocatalysts (TiO.sub.2 and ZnO), glass bubbles, and rapid hardening Portland cement as described earlier. A ratio of 1:4:25:100 was used for ZnO:TiO.sub.2:glass bubbles:cement. Water was added to the photocatalytic composition, at a water cement ratio of 0.3 and mixed using a mechanical stirrer. The moist composition was formed into 17 mm diameter spheres and moist cured for 7 days. After setting and hardening of the resulting mixture, the photocatalysts were tightly bound to the lightweight TiO.sub.2—ZnO solid composite spheres. The lightweight Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO solid composite spheres were formed by spray coating the lightweight TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite spheres with 0.1M AgNO.sub.3 solution prepared in distilled water. The Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO photocatalytic spheres were then exposed to sunlight for one hour. The TiO.sub.2—ZnO spheres turned dark in just minutes. This change in color occurred as Ag was reduced onto the surface of the TiO.sub.2—ZnO photocatalytic spheres. The Ag doped composite was then calcined at a temperature of 300° C. for three hours. Characterization of the lightweight photocatalytic solid composites: SEM and EDS results for the lightweight TiO.sub.2—ZnO and Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO photocatalytic solid composites are shown in FIG. 910. The SEM results of the TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite (FIG. 9A) clearly show the glass bubbles embedded in the matrix of cement, TiO.sub.2 and ZnO. The peaks in the EDS results (FIG. 9B) clearly show the presence of Ti, Zn, 0 and various elements that are part of the lightweight and settable composition of Portland cement and the glass bubbles. Due to significant contrast, the presence of Ag can be clearly seen as dark shades in the SEM image of the Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite (FIG. 10A). The elemental composition by EDS confirmed the presence of Ag in the Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite (FIG. 10B).

[0047] Exposure studies to evaluate bacterial inactivation: The water used for testing was obtained just after the secondary treatment, but before the addition of sodium hypochlorite (that kills harmful bacteria) from a wastewater treatment facility. Three 100 mL samples were taken in glass beakers. A TiO.sub.2—ZnO sphere was placed in one of the sample beakers, an Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO sphere was placed in the second sample beaker, and a control containing only the test water sample was placed in the third sample beaker. The photocatalytic bactericidal properties of the TiO.sub.2—ZnO and Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO lightweight composites were evaluated under various exposure conditions: sunlight (outside), visible light (inside a room), and in the dark (in a dark room). Enterobacteriaceae counts (EBC) and aerobic bacteria counts (ABC) were determined with 3M Petrifilms after 0 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h and 8 h. The petrifilms were plated (inoculated) with 1 mL of water sample. Ten-fold serial dilutions were performed for samples with high concentrations of bacteria. The plates were incubated for 48 hours at 34° C. for the ABC, and 24 hours at 34° C. for the EBC. The colonies were then manually counted.

[0048] FIG. 11 shows the average number of EBC at various time intervals for the three test samples (control, TiO.sub.2—ZnO, Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO) exposed to sunlight, visible light and in the dark. The tests were all done in triplicate. The EBC for the samples exposed to sunlight (FIG. 11A) dropped from initial average values of 197 to 0 cfu/mL in one hour for the Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite, 187 to 0 cfu/mL in four hours for the TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite and 207 to 0 cfu/mL in eight hours for the control (plain SODIS) sample. The EBC for the samples exposed to visible light (FIG. 11B) dropped from initial average values of 190 to 0 cfu/mL in four hours for the Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite, 210 to 193 cfu/mL for the TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite and 170 to 163 cfu/mL for the control, both in eight hours. The EBC for the sample with the Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite kept in the dark, dropped from an initial average value of 193 to 0 cfu/mL in eight hours (inactivated bacteria even in the dark), whereas the TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite and the control showed no appreciable change (<10%) in the EBC (FIG. 11C).

[0049] FIG. 12 shows the average number of ABC at various time intervals for the three test samples exposed to sunlight, visible light and in the dark. The ABC for the samples exposed to sunlight (FIG. 12A) dropped from initial average values of 3767 to 0 cfu/mL in one hour for the Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite, 4200 to 173 cfu/mL in eight hours for the TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite and 3967 to 187 cfu/mL in eight hours for the control sample. The ABC for the samples exposed to visible light (FIG. 12B) dropped from initial average values of 4067 to 0 cfu/mL in eight hours for the Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite, 3933 to 3567 cfu/mL and 3967 to 3767 cfu/mL for the TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite and control respectively, both in eight hours. The ABC for the sample with the Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite kept in the dark, dropped from an initial average value of 3900 to 287 cfu/mL in eight hours (worked even in the dark), whereas the TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite and the control showed no appreciable change (<10%) in the ABC (FIG. 12C). The TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite exposed to sunlight showed 100% inactivation of Enterobacteriaceae in 4 hours, and 96% inactivation of aerobic bacteria in 8 hours. The bacterial inactivation by the TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite was primarily due to UV-A activated photocatalysis as shown by its efficacy in destroying bacteria when exposed to sunlight. There was no significant bacterial inactivation when exposed to visible light or in the dark (<10%). The Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite showed 100% inactivation of Enterobacteriaceae and aerobic bacteria in 1 hour. Under visible light, the Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite showed 100% inactivation of Enterobacteriaceae in 4 hours and 100% inactivation of aerobic bacteria in 8 hours, whereas the TiO.sub.2—ZnO and control showed no appreciable (<10%) bacterial inactivation. Even for tests performed in the dark, 100% inactivation of Enterobacteriaceae was achieved in 8 hours, and 93% aerobic bacterial inactivation in 8 hours, whereas the TiO.sub.2—ZnO and control showed no appreciable bacterial inactivation (<5%). The control (plain SODIS) showed 100% and 95% inactivation of Enterobacteriaceae and aerobic bacteria respectively, when exposed to UV-A; however, it took 8 hours to achieve this disinfection.

[0050] The photo-killing property of the lightweight TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite is primarily due to the reactive oxygen species (hydroxyl radical, super oxides and hydrogen peroxide) that are generated as a result of UV-A activated photocatalysis (FIG. 13) and its interaction with the cell structure and DNA of bacteria. In the lightweight Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite, the photocatalytic activity is greatly improved resulting in the formation of more reactive oxygen species (FIG. 14). The bactericidal potency of the lightweight Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite was the greatest when exposed to sunlight, followed by visible light and finally in the dark. The synergistic effects of UV-Vis photocatalysis due to the lowering of band-gap energy, inhibition of electron-hole recombination, and the inherent antimicrobial properties of Ag enhanced the bactericidal potency of the novel Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO composite. Thus, the novel Ag—TiO.sub.2—ZnO lightweight composite can be used to purify water round-the-clock.