POWER SWITCHING ARRANGEMENT FOR LINE INSULATION MONITORING
20170222427 · 2017-08-03
Inventors
- Julian Richard DAVIS (Bristol, North Somerset, GB)
- Silviu PUCHIANU (Nailsea, Bristol, GB)
- Graham Thomas MORLEY (Nailsea, Bristol, GB)
- Steven Lewis Charles SIMPSON (Nailsea, Bristol, GB)
Cpc classification
G01R31/1245
PHYSICS
H02H5/105
ELECTRICITY
E21B17/003
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
G01R31/1272
PHYSICS
International classification
G01R31/12
PHYSICS
E21B41/00
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E21B17/00
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
Abstract
A method of performing line insulation monitoring of a pair of conductor lines at least partially located in a cable is provided, comprising the steps of providing a first power switch in a first conductor line of the pair and a second power switch in a second conductor line of the pair, providing a line insulation monitor at a first end of the pair of conductor lines, electrically connected to the pair of conductor lines, at the second end of the pair of conductor lines, electrically connecting the first and second conductor lines, placing the first and second power switches into a monitoring configuration wherein the first power switch is closed while the second power switch is open, and using the line insulation monitor to monitor the insulation of the conductor lines.
Claims
1. A method of performing line insulation monitoring of a pair of conductor lines at least partially located in a cable, the method comprising: providing a first power switch in a first conductor line of the pair and a second power switch in a second conductor line of the pair; providing a line insulation monitor at a first end of the pair of conductor lines, electrically connected to the pair of conductor lines; at the second end of the pair of conductor lines, electrically connecting the first and second conductor lines; placing the first power switch and second power switch into a monitoring configuration wherein the first power switch is closed while the second power switch is open and using the line insulation monitor to monitor the insulation of the conductor lines.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein electrically connecting the first conductor line and second conductor line comprises connecting the first conductor line and second conductor lines to a winding of a transformer.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method is performed prior to closing both the first switch and the second switch.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the cable comprises an umbilical cable, the first end of the conductor pair is located at a surface location, and the second end is located at an underwater location.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first end and second ends of the conductor pair are located at an underwater location.
6. The method according to claim 4, wherein the method is carried out at a subsea hydrocarbon extraction facility.
7. A power switch arrangement for an underwater hydrocarbon extraction facility connected to a surface location by a pair of conductor lines at least partially located within an umbilical cable, the power switch arrangement comprising: a first power switch located on a first conductor line of the pair; and a second power switch located on a second conductor line of the pair, wherein each power switch is operable between open and closed configurations for respectively preventing or enabling electrical current flow therethrough; and a control unit configured to control the configuration of each of the first switch and second switch, wherein the first power switch and second power switches are independently operable.
8. A hydrocarbon extraction facility comprising a surface location and an underwater location, the surface location and underwater location being electrically connected by a pair of conductor lines at least partially located within an umbilical cable, the hydrocarbon extraction facility comprising: 7 a first power switch located on a first conductor line of the pair; and a second power switch located on a second conductor line of the pair, wherein each power switch is operable between open and closed configurations for respectively preventing or enabling electrical current flow therethrough; and a control unit configured to control the configuration of each of the first switch and second switch, wherein the first power switch and second power switch are independently operable.
9. The hydrocarbon extraction facility according to claim 8, comprising a line insulation monitor electrically connected to the first conductor line and the second conductor lines.
10. The hydrocarbon extraction facility according to claim 9, wherein the line insulation monitor is provided at the surface location.
11. The hydrocarbon extraction facility according to claim 9, wherein the line insulation monitor is provided at the underwater location.
12. (canceled)
13. (canceled)
14. The power switch arrangement according to claim 7, further comprising a line insulation monitor electrically connected to the first conductor line and the second conductor line.
15. The power switch arrangement according to claim 14, wherein the line insulation monitor is provided at the surface location.
16. The hydrocarbon extraction facility according to claim 14, wherein the line insulation monitor is provided at the underwater location.
17. The power switch arrangement of claim 7, wherein the control unit comprises a subsea control module (SCM) or a subsea electronics module (SEM).
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0024] Embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0030] An embodiment of the present invention, employed within a subsea AC power distribution network topology generally similar to that of
[0031] As in the known system of
[0032] The power switch control 11 receives on/off controls, including power switch phase demands, from a processing core and topside communications link 14, which is capable of receiving operating instructions from the surface.
[0033] Both the switch control 11 and processing core 14 receive operational power from the surface.
[0034] In alternative embodiments, switch operation is controlled by subsea control means, such as an SCM or SEM. Power could also be received by local subsea power storage or generation means.
[0035] It should firstly be noted that within this architecture, each AC power switch's SSR elements (or equivalent) could be based on either thyristor, i.e. silicon controlled rectifier (SCR), or insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) technology depending upon the application and the function performed by the SSR. These two alternatives are briefly discussed below:
[0036] (i) SCR-based SSR
[0037] A power switch design based on ‘back to back’ thyristors (SCR) configured as an SSR, where switch ON (conduction) is initiated by triggering the SCR device gate drive and switch OFF occurs via SCR natural commutation (i.e. where the load current falls below the SCR holding current) after the SCR gate drive has been removed/disabled. The SCR gate control can be implemented using pulse control via an isolation transformer, however if the SSR design is to provide clean transitions between positive and negative half-power conduction cycles then use of continuously energised SCR gate drives is preferable to provide good performance.
[0038] (ii) IGBT-based SSR
[0039] An SSR design based on ‘tack-to-back’ IGBT devices configured as an SSR, where switch ON (conduction) is initiated by biasing the IGBT device gate drive, and the IGBT must remain biased for the IGBT conduction to be maintained. IGBT switch OFF occurs when the IGBT gate bias is removed or reversed. No natural conduction commutation occurs in the IGBT, so inductive loads can present power-off transient problems if the IGBT is not suitably protected and controlled. The IGBT gate control requires a continuous drive to provide continuous conduction and clean transitions between positive and negative half power conduction cycles.
[0040] The choice of SSR will also depend on the following factors: [0041] IGBT leakage current performance is superior to SCR leakage current performance when switched off; [0042] The IGBT does not naturally commutate off when gate drive is removed, so power off transients (due to inductive loads) can present significant design issues; [0043] The IGBT control characteristics enable a more responsive over-current protection feature to be implemented, as the IGBT switches off as soon as the gate drive is removed, so fault currents need not be supported until the power phase current naturally commutates to zero current; and [0044] Back-to-back IGBTs have been employed and are very effective at switching 600V AC (to simulate relay and circuit breaker contact bounce) and produce negligible leakage when off.
[0045] A further alternative is to use a combination approach, i.e. a power switch implemented using an IGBT and SCR SSR combination, to achieve the optimum power switch design characteristics. As an example, (assuming a series connected switch pair configuration) the L1 power switch 101 element could be implemented using a SCR SSR and the L2 power switch 102 element could be implemented using an IGBT SSR. The SCR SSR could be used for the ‘ultimate’ delivery of power to the load (last switch to be closed and first switch to be opened), and with the IGBT SSR used for the ‘making safe’ and isolation of the load (first switch to be closed and last switch to be opened). The SCR SSR could be employed for phase-controlled power delivery and the IGBT SSR employed to provide high integrity load isolation. A combination of SSR technologies may provide improved performance compared with that offered by a single technology. Furthermore, common cause failure mechanisms may be reduced if different SSR technologies are employed.
[0046] Returning to
[0047] Using these features, the control 11 can provide housekeeping telemetry and over-current trip status telemetry to the processing core 14.
[0048] A method of providing downstream umbilical isolation and LIM surveying prior to power on will now be described, with reference to
[0049] As previously described, switches 101, 102 are provided in the L1 and L2 power lines to facilitate isolation of the downstream power conductors. Initially, all switches are kept open, as shown in
[0050] Following testing of L1 and L2, conductor pair L3, L4 may then be surveyed in a generally similar manner, with switches 103, 104 being independently operable as for 101 and 102.
[0051] For this step, all four switches 101, 102, 103 and 104 are held open to prevent current flow therethrough, and then one of switches 103 or 104 is independently closed to enable a LIM survey of conductor pair L3, L4 to be performed.
[0052] It should be noted that additional power branches may also be provided, in which case each power branch could be individually LIM surveyed in this manner.
[0053] Once the or each power branch has been LIM surveyed in this way, the system may be powered on.
[0054] Those skilled in the art may recognize that SCR switch element leakage may make this feature/methodology redundant or impractical if the topside LIM can “see through” the SCR AC power switching elements be they configured ON or OFF. However the dual switch power control methodology described above will be required if dual series connected in-line IGBT based SSRs are employed. Any SCR-based SSR will exhibit a degree of leakage which will facilitate “through-sensing” to some extent. However, if both of the switches include IGBT & SCR elements then line isolation can be assured.
[0055] An IGBT (or similar)-based power switch could be considered as an alternative to the SCR-based power switching module design described above or perhaps a supplementary element (extra in-line switching element) just to provide the required isolation. The IGBT SSR in-line switching element would prevent SCR SSR power switch leakage but would require more attention to the switch gate drive (if used as the primary power switching element rather than an SCR based design) particularly when the device was switched off (as the IGBT would switch off as soon as the gate drive was removed as compared with the SCR which will naturally commutate off, as the thyristor current reduces to near zero value, after the thyristor gate drive is removed).
[0056] Alternatively, IGBT and SCR-based combination series connected SSRs could be employed, assuming that is that the voltage drop and power dissipation in each of the series connected switching elements could be tolerated. SCR-based SSRs could be used for power control requiring natural commutation and IGBT-based SSRs for line isolation.
[0057] In accordance with embodiments of the present invention therefore, the integrity of the downstream umbilical power conductor insulation (both L1 and L2 conductors with respect to chassis earth) can be appraised using the topside LIM function prior to powering on the downstream umbilical (the powering on being achieved by closing both of the L1 and L2 power switches). This appraisal is achieved by closing either one of the AC power switch elements (i.e. connecting one of L1 or L2 but not both together). By closing a single AC power switch element, the downstream umbilical is not subjected to the application of an AC voltage (applied differentially between L1 and L2), but does enable the topside LIM DC bias voltage to be applied to both the L1 and L2 downstream power conductors (as the topside LIM DC bias ‘sees through’ both the closed AC power switch and the downstream load input transformer).
[0058] Thus by providing independent control of the L1 and L2 power switches it is possible to assess the integrity of the insulation, using the topside LIM 27, of both the downstream umbilical and the load input power stage, before applying power differentially to the L1 and L2 conductors.
[0059] Furthermore, should an insulation breakdown condition develop to the extent that the topside LIM 27 is tripped, the independent control of the L1 and L2 power switches enables the user, under topside command, to investigate and isolate any umbilical elements downstream of the AC power switches (if that is where the insulation breakdown fault has developed, as opposed to an insulation breakdown of the main umbilical).
Alternative Embodiment for DC Configurations
[0060] While the above-described embodiment is suitable for AC power distribution networks, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that embodiments of the present invention could equally be used to provide LIM surveying in DC networks. The apparatus used would be substantially similar to that previously described, with the main difference that no transformer (e.g. 26 in
[0061] Depending on the nature of the DC input power conversion stage(s), it might be necessary to perform two LIM surveys, in case the DC input does not conduct sufficient DC for the LIM loop back measurement technique to work. In this case, after the initial L1 and L2 OFF (open) step, one of these switches could be independently closed and a LIM survey performed, followed by a reversal of the switching states for the two switches, and a LIM survey performed again, e.g.: L1 ON L2 OFF followed by L1 OFF L2 ON.
Alternative Embodiment for Subsea LIM
[0062] With some network arrangements, it is not possible to use, at least exclusively, a topside LIM for insulation monitoring of the power network. For example, the network may include an isolation transformer, located subsea. In that case, a topside LIM would not be able to “see past” the isolation transformer to monitor the insulation down-stream of that transformer. In such cases, it is possible to use a subsea-based LIM to effect monitoring, with the output from the subsea LIM being passed upstream for processing in a conventional manner. The methodology of embodiments of the present invention is equally applicable when using such subsea-LIMs, whether AC or DC is used. An example of this type of system is shown in
[0063] It is to be understood that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of various embodiments have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and functions of various embodiments, this disclosure is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of structure and arrangement of parts within the principles of the embodiments to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the teachings disclosed herein can be applied to other systems without departing from the scope and spirit of the application.