HOISTING ROPE AND HOISTING APPARATUS

Abstract

A hoisting rope for a hoisting apparatus has a longitudinal direction, a thickness direction and a width direction, and includes a group of load bearing members made of composite material comprising reinforcing fibers embedded in polymer matrix; and a coating encasing the group of load bearing members; wherein the load bearing members extend in an untwisted manner inside the coating parallel with each other as well as with the longitudinal direction of the rope throughout the length thereof, the load bearing members being substantially larger in width direction than in thickness direction of the rope and stacked against each other in thickness direction of the rope. An elevator includes the hoisting rope.

Claims

1. A hoisting rope for a hoisting apparatus, the hoisting rope having a longitudinal direction, a thickness direction and a width direction, and comprising: a group of load bearing members made of composite material comprising reinforcing fibers embedded in polymer matrix; and a coating encasing said group of load bearing members, wherein said load bearing members extend in an untwisted manner inside the coating parallel with each other as well as with the longitudinal direction of the rope throughout the length thereof, said load bearing members being substantially larger in the width direction than in the thickness direction of the rope and stacked against each other in the thickness direction of the rope.

2. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein the number of load bearing members in said group is at least 2.

3. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein the number of load bearing members in said group is 2.

4. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein the rope is substantially larger in the width direction than in the thickness direction, and wherein the width/thickness ratio of the rope is at least 2.

5. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein the width/thickness ratio of the load bearing members is at least 2.

6. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein the load bearing members next to each other in the thickness direction have opposing sides placed against each other, which sides are shaped to form counterparts for each other.

7. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein the load bearing members are provided for moving relative to each other within the hoisting rope by sliding against each other in longitudinal direction of the hoisting rope.

8. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein said opposing sides are unattached to each other.

9. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein the rope contains lubricant for lubricating the interface between load bearing members next to each other in the thickness direction of the rope.

10. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein one or both of the load bearing members next to each other in the thickness direction has/have an outer layer of low friction material, forming the side thereof which faces the load bearing member next to it in the thickness direction of the rope.

11. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein the opposing sides placed against each other are smooth at least in the longitudinal direction of the rope.

12. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein said reinforcing fibers are carbon fibers.

13. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein the coating comprises for the group an inside space closed in transverse direction of the rope, in which inside space said group of load bearing members is contained, and in the inside space no other load bearing members than said load bearing members of said group are contained.

14. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein the rope comprises a plurality of groups of load bearing members as defined, adjacently in width direction of the rope.

15. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein the module of elasticity E of said polymer matrix is over 2 GPa.

16. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein the number of load bearing members in said group is at least 5.

17. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein the rope is substantially thinner in the width direction than in the thickness direction, the width/thickness ratio of the rope being at most 1.

18. An elevator, comprising: a hoistway; an elevator car vertically movable in the hoistway; a counterweight vertically movable in the hoistway; and a roping comprising one or more ropes as defined in claim 1, each interconnecting the elevator car and counterweight.

19. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein the number of load bearing members in said group is less than 10.

20. The hoisting rope according to claim 1, wherein the number of load bearing members in said group is 2 or 3.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0041] In the following, the present invention will be described in more detail by way of example and with reference to the attached drawings, in which

[0042] FIG. 1 illustrates a cross section of a rope as viewed in longitudinal direction of the rope according to a first embodiment.

[0043] FIG. 2 illustrates a cross section of a rope as viewed in longitudinal direction of the rope according to a second embodiment.

[0044] FIG. 3 illustrated cross section A-A of FIG. 1 and cross section B-B of FIG. 2.

[0045] FIG. 4 illustrates a cross section of a rope as viewed in longitudinal direction of the rope according to a third embodiment.

[0046] FIG. 5a illustrates preferred details of a cross section of a load bearing member as viewed in longitudinal direction of load bearing member and the rope.

[0047] FIG. 5b illustrates three-dimensionally a load bearing member.

[0048] FIG. 6 illustrates schematically an elevator according to an embodiment of the invention as viewed from the side

[0049] The foregoing aspects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the drawings and the detailed description related thereto.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0050] FIGS. 1 and 2 each illustrate an embodiment of a hoisting rope 2,2′. In each case, the hoisting rope 2,2′ has a longitudinal direction I, thickness direction t and width direction w, and comprises a group G of load bearing members 3 and a coating 4 encasing said group G of load bearing members 3. The load bearing members 3 extend inside the coating 4 parallelly, to be more precise parallelly with respect to each other as well as with the longitudinal direction I of the rope 2,2′, and in an untwisted manner unbroken throughout the length of the rope 2,2′. The load bearing members 3 are belt-shaped, and thereby substantially larger in width direction w than in thickness direction of the rope 2,2′, and made of composite material comprising reinforcing fibers F in polymer matrix m. The load bearing members 3 are stacked against each other in thickness direction t of the rope 2,2′. Thanks to the stacked structure, the load bearing cross section is divided into load bearing layers which are on top of each other in thickness direction. The thickness of each of the load bearing members is smaller than the overall thickness of the stacked load bearing members 3. Thereby, internal stresses are divided into a plurality of separate load bearing members instead e.g. of one larger load bearing member. Thereby an interface, or in other words an discontinuity of load bearing material, is provided between each pair of load bearing members 3, which are next to each other in thickness direction of the rope 2,2′. This increases adaptability of the rope structure to stresses.

[0051] The load bearing members 3 being substantially larger in width direction w than in thickness direction t of the rope hoisting 2,2′, they become easy to stack against each other in thickness direction t of the hoisting rope 2,2′ as well as maintain the architecture of the hoisting rope 2,2′ unchanged during use of the hoisting rope 2,2′. Furthermore, the load bearing members 3 being substantially larger in width direction w than in thickness direction t of the rope hoisting 2,2′, their resistance against bending around an axis extending in width direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′ is reduced. This is advantageous when the cross sectional area of load bearing member 3 needs to be large so as to achieve good load bearing ability and the hoisting rope 2,2′ needs to be bendable around rope wheels. This is advantageous particularly in case the material of the load bearing member is hard to bend, which is the case with the composite material, and particularly so in the case of the materials as will be specified later in the description. The width/thickness—ratio of the load bearing members 3 is preferably at least 2, whereby the advantages related to the stackability and relative position of the load bearing members 3 are become clearly substantiated. However, so as to facilitate the stability of the architecture of the rope 2,2′ the width/thickness—ratio of the load bearing members is preferably at least 4 (preferably even more), whereby they maintain their relative position and support each other firmly in all situations.

[0052] The hoisting rope 2,2′ is also preferably belt shaped, and thereby substantially larger in width direction w than in thickness direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′, whereby the total resistance thereof against bending around an axis extending in width direction w of the hoisting rope 2,2′ is reduced. The width/thickness—ratio of the hoisting rope 2,2′ is preferably at least 2 whereby the advantages related to the bending resistance become clearly substantial.

[0053] The group G is preferably more specifically such that the load bearing members 3 of the group G, which are next to each other in thickness direction t of the rope 2,2′ have opposing sides placed against each other. These sides are shaped to form counterparts for each other, whereby they can support each other. In this example they are both planar. Said sides face each other (thereby facing in thickness direction of the rope 2,2′; upwards and downwards in FIGS. 1 and 2). In the preferred embodiments, as also illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2, said opposing sides are flat, whereby these sides can be arranged to rest against each other with simple structure and large area, at the same time facilitating movability between them in longitudinal direction of the rope 2,2′.

[0054] At the interface between each pair of load bearing members 3, internal stresses are at least to some amount released. At the point of the interface, when the rope 2,2′ is sharply bent, relative movement can take place between the load bearing members 3 next to each other in thickness direction of the rope without damaging internal structure of the load bearing members 3 of the rope, which kind of movement would not be possible with a rope provided with single load bearing member. Preferably, the load bearing members 3 are provided for moving within the hoisting rope 2,2′ by sliding against each other in longitudinal direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′. This can be facilitated in one or more ways, such as by smooth shaping of the opposing sides and/or by lubrication and/or by material selection of the faces. Said opposing sides placed against each other are preferably unattached to each other so movement is allowed without breaking of an attachment between them. The load bearing members 3 next to each other in thickness direction of the rope 2,2′ can move slide along each other in longitudinal direction of the rope 2,2′ is allowed also due to the feature that the load bearing members 3 are not twisted together. Also due to the feature that the load bearing members 3 are not twisted together, the sliding referred to occurs only in longitudinal direction of the rope 2,2′.

[0055] To facilitate sliding between the load bearing members 3 next to each other in thickness direction t of the hoisting rope 2,2′, the rope 2,2′ may contain lubricant for lubricating the interface between load bearing members next to each other. Accordingly, then lubricant exists between the load bearing members 3 next to each other in thickness direction of the rope 2,2′, in particular between said opposing sides placed against each other. Said opposing sides placed against each are placed against each other preferably directly with nothing but possibly a layer of lubricant between them. Lubricant or any other additional means for facilitating slidability between the load bearing members 3 is not necessary. As an alternative or additional means for facilitating slidability between the load bearing members 3, one or both of the load bearing members 3 next to each other in thickness direction may have an outer layer of low friction material, such as Teflon (Polytetrafluoroethylene; PTFE) for example, forming the side thereof which faces the load bearing member 3 next to it in thickness direction t.

[0056] The structure is more specifically such that the coating 4 comprises for each group G an inside space closed in transverse direction wherein the group G of load bearing members 3 is contained. In the preferred embodiments presented, in the inside space no other load bearing members nor any other solid components than said load bearing members of said group G are contained, which is preferable as no other components are needed for efficient and intended functioning of the solution. In the embodiments illustrated, the group G comprises only (i.e. no other load bearing members than) said load bearing members 3, which are stacked against each other in thickness direction t of the rope 2,2′. Thereby, in the group there are no load bearing members adjacent each other in width direction w of the rope 2,2′. Thus, occurrence of unnecessary chafing inside the rope 2,2′ is minimized.

[0057] In the embodiment of FIG. 1, there is only one of said groups G comprised in the rope 2, and in the embodiment of FIG. 2 there are several of said groups comprised in the rope 2′, in which case the groups G are adjacent each other in width direction w of the rope 2′. In the case where there are several of the groups G, the groups G are spaced apart in width direction of the rope 2,2′ the coating 3 extending between groups G next to each other isolating the groups G from each other. Thereby the coating 4 forms a common coating for all of the groups G of load bearing members 3 which common coating 3 encases all these groups G. This is implemented preferably as illustrated such that the coating 3 surrounds (in transverse direction) each of said groups G and fills space(s) that exist in width direction w between adjacent groups G. In cases where there are several of the groups G, the groups G and the load bearing members 3 thereof are untwisted and parallel with each other as well as with the hoisting rope 2′.

[0058] The coating 4 is preferably elastic, whereby it allows the load bearing members 3 to move in longitudinal direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′ within the rope, in particular by sliding against each other in longitudinal direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′. In each of the preferred cases, the coating 4 forms the external surface of the hoisting rope 2,2′. The coating 4 can be formed such that its shape and material suits optimally for the intended use. The coating 4 may have a contoured shape, such as polyvee pattern of longitudinal grooves and ribs, on one or both of its sides that face in thickness direction of the rope, or a tooth pattern of teeth extending across the hoisting rope 2,2′ substantially in transverse direction of the hoisting rope, on one or both of its sides that face in thickness direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′. Alternatively, the coating 4 could have a further coating, should it be preferred to for the external surface of the hoisting rope 2,2′ of some other material than the material of said coating 4.

[0059] The coating 3 is preferably attached to the group G of load bearing members 3. Particularly, the coating is preferably molded around the group G of load bearing members 3 such that it is attached to the periphery of the group G of load bearing members 3.

[0060] It is preferable that the number of load bearing members 3 in a group G is at least 2 and less than 10. In the preferred embodiments illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2, the number of load bearing members 3 in said group G is 2. FIG. 4 illustrates the configuration when the number is greater than two, in this case three. The number of load bearing members 3 is most advantageously two because in this way a considerable addition for the thickness of the load bearing cross section is obtained yet with simple structure. An advantage is that the structure is similar for both of the two load bearing members 3. Particularly, all the load bearing members, i.e. both of the two load bearing members 3, of the group G can in this way have similar coating 3 interfaces, which would not be the case when there are more than two load bearing members 3 in one group G stacked against each other. Thus, with two load bearing members 3 the coating may be attached to the wide sides of all of the load bearing members, which sides face in thickness direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′ away from each other.

[0061] FIG. 5a illustrates a preferred inner structure of the load bearing member 3, showing in particular the cross section of the load bearing member 3 as viewed in the longitudinal direction I of the load bearing member 3. As mentioned, the load bearing members 3 are made of composite material comprising reinforcing fibers F embedded in polymer matrix m. The reinforcing fibers F are more specifically distributed in polymer matrix m and bound together by the polymer matrix, particularly into an elongated rod-like piece. Thus, each load bearing member 3 is one solid elongated rodlike piece. The reinforcing fibers F are distributed preferably substantially evenly in the polymer matrix m. Thereby a load bearing member with homogeneous properties and structure is achieved throughout its cross section. In this way, it can be also ensured that each of the fibers can be in contact and bonded with the matrix m. Said reinforcing fibers F are most preferably carbon fibers, but alternatively they can be glass fibers, or possibly some other fibers. The matrix m comprises preferably epoxy, but alternative materials could be used depending on the preferred properties. Preferably, substantially all the reinforcing fibers F of each load bearing member 3 are parallel with the longitudinal direction of the load bearing member 3. Thereby the fibers are also parallel with the longitudinal direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′ as each load bearing member is oriented parallel with the longitudinal direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′. This is advantageous for the rigidity as well as behavior in bending.

[0062] The preferred inner structure of the load bearing member 3 is preferably as described in the following, wherein the structure is explained in further preferred details by referring to FIGS. 5a and 5b. Each load bearing member 3 is an elongated rod-like piece wherein the fibers F are parallel with the longitudinal direction of the load bearing member 3, and thereby parallel with the longitudinal direction of the rope 2,2′ as each load bearing member 3 is oriented parallel with the longitudinal direction of the rope 2,2′. Thereby, the fibers in the final rope 2,2′ will be aligned with the force when the rope 2,2′ is pulled, which ensures that the structure provides high tensile stiffness. The fibers F used in the preferred embodiments are substantially untwisted in relation to each other, which provides them said orientation parallel with the longitudinal direction of the rope 2,2′. This is in contrast to the conventionally twisted elevator ropes, where the wires or fibers are strongly twisted and have normally a twisting angle from 15 up to 30 degrees, the fiber/wire bundles of these conventionally twisted elevator ropes thereby having the potential for transforming towards a straighter configuration under tension, which provides these ropes a high elongation under tension as well as leads to an unintegral structure.

[0063] The reinforcing fibers F are preferably long continuous fibers in the longitudinal direction of the load bearing member, the fibers F preferably continuing for the whole length of the load bearing member 3 as well as the rope 2,2′. Thus, the load bearing ability as well as manufacturing of the load bearing member 3 is facilitated. The fibers F being oriented parallel with longitudinal direction of the rope 2,2′, as far as possible, the cross section of the load bearing member 3 can be made to continue substantially the same in terms of its cross-section for the whole length of the rope 2,2′. Thus, no substantial relative movement can occur inside the load bearing member 3 when it is bent.

[0064] As mentioned, the reinforcing fibers F are preferably distributed in the aforementioned load bearing member 3 substantially evenly, in particular as evenly as possible, so that the load bearing member 3 would be as homogeneous as possible in the transverse direction thereof. An advantage of the structure presented is that the matrix m surrounding the reinforcing fibers F keeps the interpositioning of the reinforcing fibers F substantially unchanged. It equalizes with its slight elasticity the distribution of a force exerted on the fibers, reduces fiber-fiber contacts and internal wear of the rope, thus improving the service life of the rope 2,2′. The composite matrix m, into which the individual fibers F are distributed as evenly as possible, is most preferably made of epoxy, which has good adhesiveness to the reinforcement fibers F and which is known to behave advantageously with carbon fiber. Alternatively, e.g. polyester or vinyl ester can be used, but alternatively any other suitable alternative materials can be used. FIG. 5a presents a partial cross-section of the load bearing member 3 close to the surface thereof as viewed in the longitudinal direction of the rope 2,2′ presented inside the circle in the Figure, 5a according to which cross-section the reinforcing fibers F of the load bearing member s 3 are preferably organized in the polymer matrix m. The rest (parts not showed) of the load bearing member 3 have a similar structure. FIG. 5a presents also how the individual reinforcing fibers F are substantially evenly distributed in the polymer matrix m, which surrounds the reinforcing fibers F and which is fixed to the reinforcing fibers F. The polymer matrix m fills the areas between individual reinforcing fibers F and binds substantially all the reinforcing fibers F that are inside the matrix m to each other as a uniform solid substance. A chemical bond exists between, the individual reinforcing fibers F (preferably each of them) and the matrix m, one advantage of which is uniformity of the structure. To improve the chemical adhesion of the reinforcing fiber to the matrix m, in particular to strengthen the chemical bond between the reinforcing fiber F and the matrix m, each fiber can have a thin coating, e.g. a primer (not presented) on the actual fiber structure between the reinforcing fiber structure and the polymer matrix m. However, this kind of thin coating is not necessary. The properties of the polymer matrix m can also be optimized as it is common in polymer technology. For example, the matrix m can comprise a base polymer material (e.g. epoxy) as well as additives, which fine-tune the properties of the base polymer such that the properties of the matrix are optimized. The polymer matrix m is preferably of a hard non-elastomer as in this case a risk of buckling can be reduced for instance. However, the polymer matrix need not be non-elastomer necessarily, e.g. if the downsides of this kind of material are deemed acceptable or irrelevant for the intended use. In that case, the polymer matrix m can be made of elastomer material such as polyurethane or rubber for instance. The reinforcing fibers F being in the polymer matrix means here that the individual reinforcing fibers F are bound to each other with a polymer matrix m, e.g. in the manufacturing phase by immersing them together in the fluid material of the polymer matrix which is thereafter solidified. In this case the gaps of individual reinforcing fibers bound to each other with the polymer matrix comprise the polymer of the matrix. In this way a great number of reinforcing fibers bound to each other in the longitudinal direction of the rope are distributed in the polymer matrix. As mentioned, the reinforcing fibers are preferably distributed substantially evenly in the polymer matrix m, whereby the load bearing member is as homogeneous as possible when viewed in the direction of the cross-section of the rope. In other words, the fiber density in the cross-section of the load bearing member 3 does not therefore vary substantially.

[0065] The reinforcing fibers F together with the matrix m form a uniform load bearing member, inside which abrasive relative movement does not occur when the rope is bent. The individual reinforcing fibers of the load bearing member 3 are mainly surrounded with polymer matrix m, but random fiber-fiber contacts can occur because controlling the position of the fibers in relation to each other in their simultaneous impregnation with polymer is difficult, and on the other hand, perfect elimination of random fiber-fiber contacts is not necessary from the viewpoint of the functioning of the solution. If, however, it is desired to reduce their random occurrence, the individual reinforcing fibers F can be pre-coated with material of the matrix m such that a coating of polymer material of said matrix is around each of them already before they are brought and bound together with the matrix material, e.g. before they are immersed in the fluid matrix material.

[0066] As above mentioned, the matrix m of the load bearing member 3 is most preferably hard in its material properties. A hard matrix m helps to support the reinforcing fibers f, especially when the rope bends, preventing buckling of the reinforcing fibers F of the bent rope, because the hard material supports the fibers F efficiently. To reduce the buckling and to facilitate a small bending radius of the load bearing member 3, among other things, it is therefore preferred that the polymer matrix m is hard, and in particular non-elastomeric. The most preferred materials for the matrix are epoxy resin, polyester, phenolic plastic or vinyl ester. The polymer matrix m is preferably so hard that its module of elasticity (E) is over 2 GPa, most preferably over 2.5 GPa. In this case the module of elasticity E is preferably in the range 2.5-10 GPa, most preferably in the range 2.5-3.5 GPa. There are commercially available various material alternatives for the matrix m which can provide these material properties. Preferably over 50% of the surface area of the cross-section of the load bearing member 3 is of the aforementioned reinforcing fiber, preferably such that 50%-80% is of the aforementioned reinforcing fiber, more preferably such that 55%-70% is of the aforementioned reinforcing fiber, and substantially all the remaining surface area is of polymer matrix. Most preferably, this is carried out such that approx. 60% of the surface area is of reinforcing fiber and approx. 40% is of matrix material (preferably epoxy material). In this way a good longitudinal stiffness for the load bearing member 3 is achieved. As mentioned carbon fiber is the most preferred fiber to be used as said reinforcing fiber due to its excellent properties. However, this is not necessary as alternative fibers could be used, such as glass fiber, which has been found to be suitable for the hoisting rope as well.

[0067] In the illustrated embodiments, the load bearing members 3 are substantially rectangular. However, this is not necessary as alternative shapes could be used. Likewise, it is not necessary that all the load bearing members 3 of one group G are similar in cross section, as is the case in the illustrated embodiments. Alternatively load bearing members different in cross section could be stacked against each other in thickness direction of the rope, although it is preferable also in this case that the load bearing members next to each other in thickness direction have opposing sides (facing in thickness direction of the rope) placed against each other, which sides are shaped to form counterparts for each other. Then, one of the sides could be concave shaped and the other convex shaped, for instance.

[0068] FIG. 6 illustrates a preferred embodiment of an elevator, which comprises a hoistway H; an elevator car 1 vertically movable in the hoistway H and a counterweight 5 vertically movable in the hoistway H. The elevator comprises a roping R comprising one or more hoisting ropes 2,2′ interconnecting the elevator car 1 and the counterweight 5. The elevator comprises one or more upper rope wheels 11,12 mounted higher than the car 1 and the counterweight 5, in this case particularly in proximity of the upper end of the hoistway H. In this case there are two of said rope wheels 11,12 but the elevator could be implemented also with some other number of rope wheels 11,12. Each of said one or more hoisting ropes 2,2′ pass around said one or more rope wheels 11, 12 mounted in proximity of the upper end of the hoistway H. In this case the one or more rope wheels 11, 12 are mounted inside the upper end of the hoistway, but alternatively they could be mounted inside a space beside or above the upper end of the hoistway H. Said one or more rope wheels 11, 12 comprise a drive wheel 11 engaging said one or more hoisting ropes 2,2′ and the elevator comprises a motor M for rotating the drive wheel 11. Thus, the elevator car 1 can be moved. The elevator further comprises an elevator control unit 10 for automatically controlling rotation of the motor M. Thereby also the movement of the car 1 is automatically controllable. Each hoisting rope 2,2′ is as described in context of FIGS. 1 to 5, and thereby each hoisting rope 2,2′ has a longitudinal direction I, thickness direction t and width direction w. Each hoisting rope 2,2′ comprising a group G of load bearing members 3; and a coating 4 encasing said group G of load bearing members 3; wherein the load bearing members 3 extend inside the coating 4 parallelly and in an untwisted manner and unbroken throughout the length of the rope 2,2′. The load bearing members 3 are belt-shaped, in particular substantially larger in width direction than in thickness direction of the rope 2,2′, and made of composite material comprising reinforcing fibers F in polymer matrix (m), and stacked against each other in thickness direction t of the rope 2,2′. The load bearing members 3 being substantially larger in width direction w than in thickness direction t of the hoisting rope 2,2′, they become easy to stack against each other in thickness direction t of the rope 2,2′ as well as maintain the architecture of the rope unchanged during use of the rope. Furthermore, the load bearing members 3 being substantially larger in width direction w than in thickness direction t of the hoisting rope 2,2′, their resistance against bending around an axis extending in width direction of the rope is reduced. This is advantageous when the cross sectional area of load bearing member 3 needs to be large so as to achieve good load bearing ability and the rope needs to be bendable around rope wheels. This is advantageous particularly in case the material of the load bearing member is hard to bend, which is the case with the composite material. As mentioned, the hoisting rope 2,2′ is also preferably larger in width direction w than in thickness direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′, whereby the total resistance thereof against bending around an axis extending in width direction of the hoisting rope 2,2′ is reduced.

[0069] So as to utilize the rope features facilitating rope bending, the hoisting ropes 2,2′ are arranged such that each of said one or more hoisting ropes 2,2′ passes around the one or more rope wheels 11, 12 the side thereof which faces in thickness direction t and extends in width direction w of the of the hoisting rope 2,2′, rests against the rope wheel 11, 12. Each hoisting rope passes around the one or more rope wheels 11, 12 turning around an axis extending in width direction w of the hoisting rope 2,2′. The reinforcing fibers F of the composite members are preferably carbon fibers, which are light-weighted and possess excellent load-bearing ability in longitudinal direction. Thereby, the elevator has excellent properties in terms of lifting capacity and energy-efficiency.

[0070] The elevator illustrated in FIG. 6 comprises in addition to said roping R, a second roping C interconnecting the elevator car 1 and the counterweight 5. Also this roping C can have ropes 2,2′ as described elsewhere in the application. For this roping C, the elevator comprises one or more lower rope wheels 21,22 mounted lower than the car 1 and the counterweight 5, in this case particularly in proximity of the lower end of the hoistway H. In this case there are two of said rope wheels 21,22, but the elevator could be implemented also with some other number of rope wheels 21,22. Each of said one or more hoisting ropes 2,2′ pass around said one or more rope wheels 11, 12 mounted in proximity of the upper end of the hoistway H. In this case the one or more rope wheels 11, 12 are mounted inside the lower end of the hoistway H.

[0071] In the application only elevator has been presented as a hoisting apparatus utilizing the hoisting rope 2,2′. However, the hoisting rope 2,2′ could be utilized in some other type of hoisting apparatus, such as a crane.

[0072] As mentioned, it is preferable that the number of load bearing members 3 in a group G is at least 2 and less than 10. With small number of load bearing members 3 in a group G, a considerable addition for the thickness of the load bearing cross section is obtained with simple structure. When the number of load bearing members is within the above given range of at least 2 and less than 10 (i.e. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9), the thickness of each individual load bearing member is preferably within range 0.5-4 mm, their combined thickness then preferably being between 1 to 20 mm, whereby a rope best suitable for elevator is obtained in particular due to its behavior in bending. However, the above given range of at least 2 and less than 10 need not necessarily be realized as the number could be alternatively be even greater, such as up to one hundred, when a more complicated structure is acceptable. In case the number is greater than said at least 2 and less than 10 the thickness of each individual load bearing member is preferably smaller than above mentioned, most preferably within range 0.1-2 mm, their combined thickness then preferably again being between said 1 to 20 mm.

[0073] It is to be understood that the above description and the accompanying Figures are only intended to teach the best way known to the inventors to make and use the invention. It will be apparent to a person skilled in the art that the inventive concept can be implemented in various ways. The above-described embodiments of the invention may thus be modified or varied, without departing from the invention, as appreciated by those skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that the invention and its embodiments are not limited to the examples described above but may vary within the scope of the claims and their equivalents.