FLOOR CLEANING DEVICE

Abstract

A nozzle (10) for a floor cleaning device, suitable for both wet and dry cleaning, the nozzle comprising an airflow inlet (50) at a front end of the nozzle, and a detachable cleaning device (90) that, if mounted on the nozzle (10), lifts a rear end of the nozzle.

Claims

1. A nozzle for a floor cleaning device, suitable for both wet and dry cleaning, the nozzle comprising: an airflow inlet at a front end of the nozzle, a rear wrieei at rear end of the nozzle, and wherein a detachable wet cleaning devices that, if mounted underneath the rear wheel of the nozzle, lifts a rear end of the nozzle, whereinthe detachable wet cleaning device is arranged for being provided with a removable mopping substrate, and wherein the detachable wet cleaning device has a liquid container for containing a liquid for wetting the removable mopping substrate.

2. (canceled)

3.(canceled)

4. A nozzle as claimed in claim 1, wherein the nozzle has a squeegee that reaches substantially close to a surface to be cleaned with the detachable cleaning device being attached to the nozzle.

5. A nozzle as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a rotating brush in said airflow inlet, which rotating brush is lifted from a surface to be cleaned as a result of mounting the detachable cleaning device, wherein an offset between said rotating brush and the surface is less than 1.2 mm in the presence of the detachable cleaning device.

6. A floor cleaning device, comprising a nozzle as claimed in claim 1, and an air pump connectable to the nozzle.

7. A floor cleaning device as claimed in claim 6, which is battery-operated.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0014] FIG. 1 shows a typical architecture of a battery operated floor cleaning device;

[0015] FIG. 2 shows the floor cleaning device of FIG. 1 with a squeegee;

[0016] FIG. 3 shows the airflow in the floor cleaning device of FIG. 1;

[0017] FIG. 4 shows the airflow in the floor cleaning device of FIG. 2;

[0018] FIG. 5 shows a floor cleaning device provided with a mopping element in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;

[0019] FIG. 6 shows a brush offset as an impact of lifting the rear wheels in the floor cleaning device in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;

[0020] FIG. 7 shows an angular offset as an impact of lifting the rear wheels in the floor cleaning device in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;

[0021] FIG. 8 shows the impact of lifting the rear wheels on the performance on cleaning the crevices;

[0022] FIG. 9 shows a top view of the floor cleaning device of FIG. 5;

[0023] FIGS. 10 and 11 show an embodiment of a floor cleaning device in which the squeegee can shift down when the rear end of the appliance is lifted; and

[0024] FIG. 12 shows another embodiment of the invention with the front wheels formed at the ends of the suction channel

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0025] To have a good cleaning performance with low suction power<30 W (mains connected appliances use in general>100 W suction power (current state of art)), agitation of the dust or agitation of the piles of the carpets is necessary. Therefore all common known battery operated appliances are equipped with a rotating brush for agitating the dust/piles. The typical architecture of a battery operated appliance is shown in FIG. 1, which illustrates housing 10, housing stick 20, drive motor rotating brush 30, rear wheel 40, airflow channel 50, rotating brush 60, and front wheel 70. However, it will be appreciated by a person skilled in the art that the battery-operated appliance can be replaced by an appliance which has no batteries and is operated via mains, or by an appliance which is operated via a combination of battery and mains. Further, the appliance may have a non powered brush/passive brush or no brush at all. Furthermore, in case of a powered brush, the brush can be powered using an air turbine or an electric motor either internal or external to the powered brush casing.

[0026] By in-depth study of user behavior, we know that coarse dirt is approached from the front of the appliance. Especially, when the wheels on the nozzle are clearly visible. Referring to FIGS. 2, 3, and 4, by placing a squeegee 80 behind the rotating brush 60 the airflow is much more efficient to pick up the dirt as the airflow is now concentrated in the front of the nozzle as seen in the Figures.

[0027] The appliance with rotating brush and squeegee is able to clean hard and soft floors to an acceptable level.

[0028] To make the appliance a hybrid appliance so that hard floors can also be wet cleaned, a mopping element can be added. Because the mopping action is almost simultaneous with the vacuum action, the mop remains clean for a longer period than when performing the vacuum and mopping actions sequentially.

[0029] Another additional advantage of using a battery operated appliance and the associated low suction power is that the water which is distributed to the floor by the mopping element is not sucked back up by the suction nozzle. This prevents that the dirt/air separation can be done on the traditional manner without having precautions for water intake. Thus, this eliminates the task of having a expensive water filtration module within the device and makes the device economical.

[0030] The three obvious positions to place a mopping element (in front, at the rear or in between wheels and squeegee) will result in an appliance which will get dirty quickly. The brush, squeegee and wheels touchthe floor and pick up liquid and wet dirt during usage.

[0031] Referring now to FIG. 5, to protect squeegee 80 and brush 60 from polluting, in accordance with an aspect of the invention, mopping element 90 is placed underneath the rear wheels 40. The whole system is than tilted a bit, and the squeegee and brush are also lifted from the floor a little. Further, the front end of the nozzle, with or without the wheels, continues to touch the floor as before and is not lifted. Thus, an optimum suction is still maintained and the suction boundaries are formed by the front wheel and the rear squeegee 80 and mopping element 90. Even when for stubborn stains, the appliance is moved several times back and forwards, the brush and squeegee remain clean. It will be appreciated that the squeegee will be lifted in such a manner that it maintains minimal air gap with the floor and thus ensures an optimum suction efficiency.

[0032] If the rear wheels are lifted just a little, the performance drop due to lifting the brush and squeegee is very limited. The brush offset BO and lifting of the appliance by angle a can be seen in FIGS. 6 and 7, respectively. The bigger coarse dirt is still touched by the brush and the airflow is still directed to the front. The graph of FIG. 8 shows the impact of lifting on the performance on cleaning crevices (most difficult to clean area of the floors) at two different voltages, i.e. 18 V and 14.4 V respectively: the higher the distance from the floor (horizontal axis), the lower the dirt pick-up percentage DPU (vertical axis). Further, it can be inferred from the graph of FIG. 8 that the performance or percentage DPU drops below 30% when the brush offset BO is more than 1.2 mm. It has been revealed from user studies that a percentage DPU of below 30% is well detected by the user as the user is able to notice a drop in performance/suction and visible cleanliness. Therefore, the brush offset BO will always be kept above 30% DPU levels or between 0-1.2 mm. The two different voltages used to plot the graph correspond to two different upright suction cleaners that were used for testing. It will be appreciated that given a higher voltage rating a higher suction power can be achieved and the brush offset can be even more without undue decrease in DPU and performance i.e. a DPU of 30% and more can be attained with a significant brush offset as compared to the range mentioned above.

[0033] The brush offset can be translated into an angular relation that the mopping device makes with the surface to be cleaned, e.g. the floor. The brush offset BO mentioned above can be achieved by angularly rotating in the XY plane the imaginary axis of the front wheels between a range of 0 degrees and 15 degrees both including as shown in FIG. 7. These aforementioned design principles can be adopted to achieve optimum percentage DPU in the device along with good mopping performance.

[0034] As shown in FIG. 12, in another embodiment of this invention, the wheels are not present in the front but placed along the suction channel/opening. In this embodiment, when the mopping accessory is placed underneath the rear wheels and the appliance will be lifted then the angle alpha will have very little effect on the suction performance as the suction channel will be closer to the floor then the previous embodiment for the fact that the wheels will be touching the floor and the suction channel is formed between the wheels.

[0035] When the mopping element is placed closely to the squeegee it also reduces air leakage to the rear due to the lifting of the squeegee.

[0036] By placing the mopping element underneath the wheels, there is also a place created to put small reservoirs on the mopping element beside the wheels.

[0037] The architecture of a battery operated nozzle is depicted in FIG. 9 (top view), showing housing 10, wheels 40, mopping element 90, and reservoirs 100.

[0038] By adding a suitable water transport mechanism (e.g. small holes or wick as described in co-pending US application 62/065950, attorneys' reference 2014PF01449, incorporated herein by reference) between reservoirs 100 and the mopping element, a wet mopping function can be achieved. Further, the cleaning performance overtime is limited by the volume of the reservoir and no longer limited to the amount of water that can be held in the cloth or wipe underneath the mopping element.

[0039] It also means that the wetness of the floor does no longer depend on the way it is used by the user. The performance is therefore much more guaranteed and is stable during usage (cloth does not dry out).

[0040] The surface area that can be cleaned is only limited by the volume of the reservoir. A wetness of the floor of approximately 2 gr/m.sup.2 means that for cleaning an average house of 100 m.sup.2 hard floors, a reservoir of 200 ml is sufficient. If the cloth is e.g. 5 cm×30 cm, the height of the reservoir can be less than 1.5 cm.

[0041] Because the mopping element contains the reservoirs and the cloth it can be easily be placed and detached from the appliance without making an interface for connecting wet elements. This also means that a hybrid appliance can be built by using the standard architecture of a battery operated vacuum appliance.

[0042] A simple interface between the mopping element that contains all the “wet:” parts and the vacuum nozzle can be done on numerous ways. A good and simple way which is very appreciated by users is a connection by magnets.

[0043] Referring to FIGS. 10 and 11, the reduction in performance of dirt pick up due to lifting the appliance can be reduced by a simple mechanism that the squeegee is fixated in such a manner that it can shift down when the rear end of the appliance is lifted. FIG. 10 shows a normal width of a gap G, while FIG. 11 shows a reduced width of gap G, resulting from a spring that pushes the squeegee downwards. Such a function can be achieved in numerous ways and one example can be by using springs which lowers the squeegee when it is lifted. Also, as mentioned above it will be ensured that the squeegee maintains a minimal air gap when lifted.

[0044] It should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate rather than limit the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be able to design many alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims. In the claims, any reference signs placed between parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claim. The word “comprising” does not exclude the presence of elements or steps other than those listed in a claim. The word “a” or “an” preceding an element does not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.