Procedure to use the tailings as construction material giving it waterproofing characteristics and reduce its cracking

Abstract

A process to use the tailings as construction material giving it waterproofing characteristics and reduce its cracking is presented. For example, to use the mining tailing as a construction material conceding to it impermeabilizing features, reducing its cracking and increasing its resistance. The main stages of said process are to apply a calcium-containing solution to the soil to be treated; apply a solution that that contains calcite-producing bacteria, to the soil to be treated; optionally, add maltodextrin; and stabilize, compact and dry off the mix.

Claims

1. A process to utilize mining tailing as construction material conceding to it impermeabilizing properties and reducing its cracking, the process consisting of: a) applying to a mix of soil-mining tailings to be treated a solution that contains calcium; b) applying to the mix of soil-mining tailing treated in step (a), a solution that includes bacteria selected from the genre Bacillus or the genre Sporosarcina; c) adding maltodextrin; and d) stabilizing, compacting, and drying off the treated mix of soil-mining tailing, wherein the solutions from steps a) and b) are applied by at least one of aspersion, mixes, or irrigation.

2. The process according to claim 1, wherein the maltodextrin is added at 30% weight per volume (w/v) to the bacterial solution.

3. The process according to claim 1, wherein said calcium-containing solution is applied at an rate from 40 to 150 L/m.sup.2.

4. The process according to claim 1, wherein the solution that includes calcite-generating bacteria is applied at rate from 40 to 150 L/m.sup.2.

5. The process according to claim 1, wherein the maltodextrin is added to confer more hardness to the construction material.

6. The process according to claim 1, wherein the stabilization of step d) is done for 24 to 72 hours.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

(1) FIG. 1 shows microscopic images with a magnification of 100×, of the bacterial culture prepared with mining industrial water.

(2) FIG. 2 shows the effect of the additive in the permeability of the mining tailings treated.

(3) FIG. 3 shows the control treatment for the treated mining tailing: the tag indicates the day of assay and the cell number.

(4) FIG. 4 shows the treatment with Dose 1 (0.11 L/Kg) of the treated mining tailing: the tag indicates the day of assay and the cell number.

(5) FIG. 5 shows the treatment with Dose 2 (0.21 L/Kg) of the treated mining tailing: the tag indicates the day of assay and the cell number.

(6) FIG. 6 shows the treatment with Dose 3 (0.42 L/Kg of the treated mining tailing: the tag indicates the day of assay and the cell number.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(7) The present invention refers to a process to use the mining tailing as a construction material, conceding to it impermeabilizing features and reducing its cracking, that includes the stages of: a) Apply to the soil to be treated a solution that contains 25000 ppm of calcium, using an irrigation rate from 40 to 150 L/m.sup.2; b) Apply to the soil to be treated a solution that includes calcite-producing bacteria selected from genus Bacillus or Sporosarcina, using an irrigation rate from 40 to 150 L/m.sup.2; c) In case to be required, apply maltodextrin in a percentage of 30% w/v to the bacterial solution. d) stabilize the treated soil at room temperature for 24 to 72 hours; e) stabilization, compaction and dry off.

(8) The applications of solutions of stages a) and b) is done by aspersion, mix, irrigation, or combinations thereof.

(9) Microorganisms included in the solution of stage b) are selected from native calcite-producing bacteria from genus Bacillus or Sporosarcina, or combinations thereof.

EXAMPLES

Example 1: Bacterial Growth in Waters from Mining

(10) The growth of the bacteria used in this invention was evaluated in industrial water supplemented with industrial nutrients. Different physical-chemistry parameters were monitored, previous to the study of bacterial growth in this industrial water, and then the incubation and growing of the microorganism. Results are shown in table No 1.

(11) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE NO 1 Measure of pH, dissolved oxygen and conductivity previous of bacterial incubation and after 0, 24 and 96 hours of bacterial growth. Dissolved Conductivity pH O.sub.2 (mg/L) (mS/cm) Previous 6.31 7.79 8.83  0 hrs. 8.7 3.72 20.4 24 hrs. 9.14 0.25 36.7 96 hrs. 9.16 2.85 38.2

(12) An increase in pH is registered in the bacterial culture, because of the release of components that increases pH to values over 9. Dissolved oxygen decreases at 24 hours due to the aerobic nature of bacteria assayed; however, an increase was observed at 96 hours, indicating that the bacteria is in death phase. It is known that carbonate metabolism has already generated, so the bacterial death does not affect the final product nor the effectivity of the proposed process. Finally, an increase in conductivity was observed due to generation of metabolites.

(13) Additionally, photographs were taken to the bacterial culture prepared with water coming from mining, to verify the presence of the bacteria of interest. Is it known that they have a bacillar morphology, and that forms diplo and streptobacillus groups, that is observed in high bacterial density in FIG. 1, with the morphology and grouping typical of the bacteria of interest. The obtained results indicate that water coming from mining, is suitable for growing the microorganisms of interest.

Example 2: Proctor Standard Assay (NCh 1534/2 of 79)

(14) The amount of water in the material mixes necessary for the maximal compaction was determined. 5 mixes of soil-tailing were analyzed (M01-M05) and a Proctor curve was determined for each mix. The summary of results for the Standard Proctor assay performed to the 5 mixes of soil-tailing are shown in Table No 2.

(15) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE NO 2 Proctor Standard Results Optimal Natural M.H.C.D, M.D.C.D, Humidity Humidity Mezcla Kg/m.sup.3 Kg/m.sup.3 % % M01(100% S) 2.069 1.793 15.4 8.5 M02(75% S, 25% R) 2.132 1.838 16.0 ND M03(50% S, 50% R) 2.128 1.846 15.3 ND M04(25% S, 75% R) 2.130 1.867 14.1 ND M05(100% R) 2.114 1.866 13.3 4.0 M.H.C.D: Maximal Humid Compacted Density; M D.C.D: Maximal Dry Compacted Density.

Example 3: Permeability Assay

(16) For test tube confection, 2 kilograms of material for each test tube was considered, dosed at a rate of 130 L/m.sup.3 and water was added until it reached a density of 90% of the Standard Proctor, previously determined. It was established that before the assay execution, to allow the mixes plus the additive to react for a 24 h period. In a first instance it was realized according to the ASTM D 2432 regulation. The permeability study started with the 100% soil mix (M01), this material needed at least 2 days for complete saturation. Water entry was realized with a water load of 3 cm height (h) to avoid posterior turbulences and holes in the material, no water runoff was detected during the first 24 hours, after this, the hydraulic gradients (i) were increased to 0.3 (9 cm), 0.4 (12 cm) and 0.5 (16 cm). The obtained permeability results for mix M01 (100% soil) are presented in Table No 3.

(17) The assay of the sample of the mining tailing 100% dry (M05), started with the sample saturation for 2 days with a water load (h) of 3 cm to avoid posterior turbulences and holes in the material. Like the soil sample, no water runoff was detected during the first 24 hours. After this, that water load was increased to 9 cm, that produced a slight water blooming after 24 hours of raised the level.

(18) Lecture were done after three days of the beginning of the assay, increasing the hydraulic gradients (i) to 0.3 (9 cm) and 0.4 (12 cm). Permeability results of the 100% dry sample (M05) are presented in table No 3.

(19) Each of the soil:mining tailing mixes prepared according the experimental design and with the additive applied were subjected to the same permeability continuous load test described before. The permeability results are shown in Table N 3.

(20) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Permeability Results % Mining Permeability Mix Additive tailing k(cm/s) M1 Control 0 1.41E−04 M2 Control 25 1.11E−05 M3 Control 50 1.08E−06 M4 Control 75 3.36E−07 M5 Control 100 3.14E−05 M1 Additive 0 1.29E−05 M2 Additive 25 1.07E−05 M3 Additive 50 8.19E−06 M4 Additive 75 1.79E−07 M5 Additive 100 1.35E−06

(21) In FIG. 2 is possible to note that with a 75% of mining tailing in the soil:mining tailing mix the best results are obtained, showing an increase of the impermeability as compared with the mix with only mining tailing. This suggests that it has to be used a range of 50-75% of mining tailing in the soil:mining tailing mix.

Example 4: Cracking Reduction

(22) Photographic monitoring: Daily photographic shots were taken to the cracking cells in order to be subsequently analyzed using the Image J software (This software allows to measure and quantify the picture colors by colorimetry, that is, it transform the color tone range in a quantifiable numeric scale) and obtain Ia cracking tendency in each condition.

(23) In this assay 3 different additive Doses were used:

(24) Dose 1: 0.11 L of Additive per pulp Kilo.

(25) Dose 2:0.21 L of Additive per pulp Kilo

(26) Dose 3: 0.42 L of Additive per pulp Kilo

(27) Cracking Cell Monitoring:

(28) Photographic analysis of the cracking cells: Following of the implicated area in the cracks formed in each cell was estimated from the distribution of the gray scale that delivers the colorimetric histogram of the pictures.

(29) When the formation of cracks was observed in the central zone of each cell, it was possible to note that in the control cell, the crack appears after 12 days, being evident in day 15. In the cells with Additive, this time is prolonged until day 30, 22 and 27 for Dose 1, Dose 2 and Dose 3, respectively.

(30) In the FIGS. 3 to 6, the tag indicates the assay day and cell number, in a way that 12-1 indicates the picture from day No 12 from cell 1, that is the control cell, meaning that:

(31) Cell 1: Control

(32) Cell 2: Dose 1

(33) Cell 3: Dose 2

(34) Cell 4: Dose 3

(35) When observing the assemblies, it was possible to rapidly compare the day when cracks appeared, since the cracks appearance is visible to naked eye. The incorporation of the additive can retard the appearance of cracks.

(36) Although this invention has been described under the modalities previously mentioned, it is evident that other alternatives, modifications or variations will render the same results, however, we have established that all the stages that conform the process to use the mining tailing as construction material conceding to it impermeabilizing and reducing its cracking, are fundamental to the success of the present invention here described. Consequently, the invention modalities pretend to be illustrative, but not restricting. A variety of changes can be done without moving away from the spirit and reach of the invention as is defined in the following claims.