RESONANT FREQUENCY COMPENSATION

Abstract

A wireless power transfer apparatus has a resonant circuit electrically coupled to a power converter. The resonant circuit includes a magnetic coupler L.sub.pt for magnetic coupling with a second apparatus. A controller associated with the power converter is configured to vary a relative phase of operation of the power converter with respect to the second apparatus, the phase being varied to at least partially compensate for variations in a resonant frequency of the resonant circuit.

Claims

1. A wireless power transfer apparatus suitable for magnetic coupling with a second apparatus, the wireless power transfer apparatus comprising: a power converter electrically coupled or coupleable with a power source or load; a resonant circuit electrically coupled with the power converter and comprising a magnetic coupler for magnetic coupling with the second apparatus; and a controller associated with the power converter and configured to vary a relative phase of operation of the power converter with respect to the second apparatus, the phase being varied to at least partially compensate to control reactive impedance of the resonant circuit.

2. (canceled)

3. The wireless power transfer apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein the relative phase is varied to compensate for variations in a resonant frequency of the resonant circuit caused by variation in a reactive impedance.

4. The wireless power transfer apparatus as claimed in claim 3 wherein the variation in reactive impedance comprises a variation in inductance.

5. The wireless power transfer apparatus as claimed in claim 4 wherein the variation in inductance is caused by misalignment of the magnetic coupler with a second magnetic coupler of the second apparatus.

6. The wireless power transfer apparatus as claimed in claim 4 wherein the variation in inductance is caused by a foreign object in the vicinity of the magnetic coupler.

7. The wireless power transfer apparatus as claimed in claim 3 wherein the variation in reactive impedance is caused by variation in a component tolerance.

8. The wireless power transfer apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein the controller is further configured to vary a duty cycle of the power converter to control a magnitude of wireless power transfer.

9. The wireless power transfer apparatus as claimed in claim 8 wherein the controller varies the duty cycle of the converter by varying the phase angle over which a switch conducts.

10. The wireless power transfer apparatus as claimed in claim 8 wherein the power transfer may be to or from the wireless power transfer apparatus to the second wireless power transfer apparatus, or vice versa.

11. A method for controlling a first wireless power transfer apparatus magnetically coupled or coupleable with a second wireless power transfer apparatus, the method comprising: varying a relative phase of operation of the first wireless power transfer apparatus with respect to the second wireless power transfer apparatus to control a reactive impedance of the resonant circuit.

12. The method as claimed in claim 11 further comprising detecting a variation in a reactive impedance, and varying the relative phase of operation to control the reactive impedance.

13. The method as claimed in claim 12 wherein the variation in reactive impedance is caused by a variation in the inductance of a magnetic coupler of the first wireless power transfer apparatus.

14. The method as claimed in claim 11 further comprising varying a duty cycle of a power converter of the first wireless power transfer apparatus to control a magnitude of wireless power transfer.

15. The method as claimed in claim 14 further comprising varying the duty cycle of the power converter of the first wireless power transfer apparatus relative to a duty cycle of a power converter of the second wireless power transfer apparatus to control a magnitude of wireless power transfer to or from the first wireless power transfer apparatus.

16. A wireless power transfer apparatus suitable for magnetic coupling with a second apparatus, the wireless power transfer apparatus comprising: a power converter electrically coupled or coupleable with a power source or load; a resonant circuit electrically coupled with the power converter and comprising a magnetic coupler for magnetic coupling with the second apparatus; and a controller associated with the power converter and configured to vary a relative phase of operation of the power converter with respect to the second apparatus, the phase being varied to at least partially compensate for variations in a reactive impedance.

17. A method for controlling a first wireless power transfer apparatus magnetically coupled or coupleable with a second wireless power transfer apparatus, the method comprising: varying a relative phase of operation of the first wireless power transfer apparatus with respect to the second wireless power transfer apparatus to control a reactive impedance to at least partially compensate for variations in a reactive impedance of the first wireless power transfer apparatus.

Description

DRAWING DESCRIPTION

[0059] A number of embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the drawings in which:

[0060] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a first embodiment of an inductive power transfer (IPT) system according to the present invention;

[0061] FIG. 2 illustrates example primary and secondary voltage waveforms according to the embodiment of FIG. 1;

[0062] FIG. 3 is an equivalent circuit model of the system of FIG. 1;

[0063] FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a possible controller according to the present invention, which is suitable for use in the system of FIG. 1;

[0064] FIG. 5 show graphs of both compensated and uncompensated (a) input impedance and (b) angle versus frequency;

[0065] FIG. 6 shows (a) uncompensated and (b) compensated voltage and current waveforms of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

[0066] FIG. 7 is a graph of system efficiency of the embodiment of FIG. 1, with and without the compensation provided by the present invention;

[0067] FIG. 8 shows (a) uncompensated and (b) compensated voltage and current waveforms of an alternative embodiment of an IPT system according to the present invention; and

[0068] FIG. 9 shows (a) uncompensated and (b) compensated voltage and current waveforms of yet another embodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0069] The present invention comprises a wireless power transfer apparatus and system, and methods for controlling the same. Throughout the description like reference numerals will be used to refer to like features in different embodiments.

[0070] FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a bi-directional inductive power transfer (IPT) system 100 substantially as disclosed by International Patent Publication No. WO 2010/062198, the content of which is incorporated herein in its entirety. The example IPT system comprises a primary side 110 and a secondary side 120, in this example each electrically substantially identical. The primary side comprises a primary controller 111 which controls operation of the primary converter 112 comprising four switches in a full bridge circuit configuration. The primary converter is coupled to the primary power source/sink, V.sub.in, and a resonant circuit 113. The resonant circuit 113 in this example comprises a tuned inductor-capacitor-inductor (LCL) circuit made up of series inductor L.sub.pi, tuning capacitor C.sub.pt, and primary magnetic coupler L.sub.pt.

[0071] The secondary side 120 of the IPT system 111 similarly comprises a secondary controller 121, secondary converter 122, and LCL resonant circuit 123 comprising a secondary magnetic coupler L.sub.st. The magnetic or inductive coupling between the primary and secondary magnetic couplers L.sub.pt, L.sub.st is represented by the mutual inductance M and voltage sources V.sub.pt and V.sub.st, respectively.

[0072] As disclosed in WO 2010/062198, the primary controller 111 preferably drives the switches of the primary converter 112 in pairs at a fixed frequency f.sub.T (preferably equal to the designed resonant frequency of the resonant circuit 113) to produce a voltage waveform V.sub.pi as shown by way of example in FIG. 2. In this example, the voltage waveform comprises a three-level modified square wave. The phase angle φ.sub.p over which each pair of switches in the primary converter 112 (in this case, functioning as an inverter) remains switched on may be varied (between 0° and 180°), thereby determining the duty cycle (φ.sub.p/(π−φ.sub.p)) of the converter to control the magnitude of the alternating current I.sub.pi supplied to the primary magnetic coupler, L.sub.pt. Similarly, the phase angle φ.sub.s over which each pair of switches in the secondary converter 122 (in this case, functioning as rectifier) remains switched on may be varied (between 0° and 180°), thereby determining the duty cycle (φ.sub.s/(π−φ.sub.s)) of the converter.

[0073] Referring still to FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, the secondary converter 122 is controlled by the pick-up/secondary controller 121 similarly to the primary converter 112 to produce a secondary voltage waveform V.sub.si with controllable duty cycle. Wireless power transfer takes place across an air-gap between primary and pick-up magnetic couplers L.sub.pt, L.sub.st which are loosely coupled to each other through mutual inductance M.

[0074] When power is transferred from the primary side to the secondary side of the system, the secondary converter 122 functions as a rectifier. However, as in this example at least some embodiments of the invention are capable of transferring power in either direction between the primary and secondary sides. In such bi-directional embodiments, the primary converter 112 and secondary converter 122 thus preferably each comprise an active reversible rectifier/inverter. The term “converter” as used throughout the description is therefore intended to encompass a rectifier (whether passive or active), an inverter, or a reversible inverter/rectifier, the appropriate selection of which is dependent on the application.

[0075] The relative phase angle θ and/or converter phase angles φ.sub.p, φ.sub.s may be varied to control the magnitude and direction of power flow between the primary and secondary sides of the IPT system (dependent on the power requirements of the load coupled with the secondary side, for example). Often, the relative phase angle θ may be fixed or regulated at ±90° for unity power factor operation, while the magnitude of power transfer is controlled by varying the converter phase angles φ.sub.p, φ.sub.s. Alternatively, all three phase angles θ, φ.sub.p, φ.sub.s may be varied to control the magnitude and direction of power flow.

[0076] According to the present invention, however, the relative phase angle θ is varied to control a compensating reactive impedance in order to compensate for any variation in reactance and thus maintain the tuning of both the primary and secondary magnetic couplers L.sub.pt, L.sub.st. The secondary output power V.sub.out is thus regulated independently of the amount of compensation applied to maintain the tuned condition.

[0077] To further explain the theory and operation of the present invention, a mathematical analysis of the IPT system of FIG. 1 is presented below.

[0078] The example IPT system shown in FIG. 1 employs identical electronics on both the primary and secondary side, each comprising a full-bridge converter and an LCL resonant network tuned to the fundamental frequency f.sub.T of V.sub.pi as given by Equation (1).

[00001]$\begin{array}{cc}2.Math..Math.{\pi .Math.f}_T={\omega }_T=\frac{1}{L_{\mathrm{pi}}.Math.C_{\mathrm{pt}}}=\frac{1}{L_{\mathrm{pt}}.Math.C_{\mathrm{pt}}}=\frac{1}{L_{\mathrm{si}}.Math.C_{\mathrm{st}}}=\frac{1}{L_{\mathrm{st}}.Math.C_{\mathrm{st}}}& \left(1\right)\end{array}$

[0079] To simplify the analysis, the voltage V.sub.pi produced by the primary converter 112 can be represented by an equivalent sinusoidal voltage source that has a frequency f.sub.T and a phasor-domain magnitude as given by Equation (2).

[00002]$\begin{array}{cc}{V}_{\mathrm{pi}}=\frac{4.Math.V_{\mathrm{in}}}{\pi }.Math.\sin \left(\frac{{\varphi }_p}{2}\right).Math.\mathrm{\angle 0}& \left(2\right)\end{array}$

[0080] Similarly, the voltage produced by the secondary converter is given in the phasor-domain by Equation (3).

[00003]$V_{\mathrm{si}}=\frac{4.Math.V_{\mathrm{out}}}{\pi }.Math.\sin \left(\frac{{\varphi }_p}{2}\right).Math.\mathrm{\angle \theta }$

[0081] At steady state, the voltage V.sub.sr induced in the secondary magnetic coupler L.sub.st due to current I.sub.pt is given by Equation (4).

V.sub.sr=jωMI.sub.pt   (4)

[0082] Similarly, the voltage V.sub.pr reflected back into or induced in L.sub.pt due to current I.sub.st in L.sub.st can be expressed by Equation (5).

V.sub.pr=jωMI.sub.st   (5)

[0083] Under tuned conditions in Equation (1), the currents I.sub.pi, I.sub.pt, I.sub.si and I.sub.st can therefore be derived as given by Equations (6)-(9).

[00004]$\begin{array}{cc}{I}_{\mathrm{pi}}=j.Math.\frac{M}{{\omega }_T.Math.L_{\mathrm{pt}}.Math.L_{\mathrm{st}}}.Math.V_{\mathrm{si}}& \left(6\right)\\ I_{\mathrm{pt}}=-j.Math.\frac{1}{{\omega }_T.Math.L_{\mathrm{pt}}}.Math.V_{\mathrm{pi}}& \left(7\right)\\ I_{\mathrm{si}}=j.Math.\frac{M}{{\omega }_T.Math.L_{\mathrm{pt}}.Math.L_{\mathrm{st}}}.Math.V_{\mathrm{pi}}& \left(8\right)\\ I_{\mathrm{st}}=-j.Math.\frac{M.Math..Math.1}{{\omega }_T.Math.L_{\mathrm{st}}}.Math.V_{\mathrm{si}}& \left(9\right)\end{array}$

[0084] The IPT system of FIG. 1 can thus be represented by the equivalent circuit model shown in FIG. 3, where the induced voltage sources V.sub.pr, V.sub.sr are represented by complex impedances Z.sub.pr, Z.sub.sr, respectively. Using Equations (2)-(9), the complex impedances Z.sub.pr and Z.sub.sr can be derived as given by Equations (10) and (11).

[00005]$\begin{array}{cc}{Z}_{\mathrm{pr}}=-\frac{{\omega }_T.Math.{\mathrm{ML}}_{\mathrm{pt}}}{L_{\mathrm{st}}}.Math.\frac{\sin \left({\varphi }_s\right)}{\sin \left({\varphi }_p\right)}.Math.\sin \left(\theta \right)+j.Math.\frac{{\omega }_T.Math.{\mathrm{ML}}_{\mathrm{pt}}}{L_{\mathrm{st}}}.Math.\frac{\sin \left({\varphi }_s\right)}{\sin \left({\varphi }_p\right)}.Math.\cos \left(\theta \right)=R_{\mathrm{pr}}+{\mathrm{jX}}_{\mathrm{pr}}& \left(10\right)\\ Z_{\mathrm{sr}}=-\frac{{\omega }_T.Math.{\mathrm{ML}}_{\mathrm{pt}}}{L_{\mathrm{pt}}}.Math.\frac{\sin \left({\varphi }_s\right)}{\sin \left({\varphi }_p\right)}.Math.\sin \left(\theta \right)+j.Math.\frac{{\omega }_T.Math.{\mathrm{ML}}_{\mathrm{st}}}{L_{\mathrm{pt}}}.Math.\frac{\sin \left({\varphi }_s\right)}{\sin \left({\varphi }_p\right)}.Math.\cos \left(\theta \right)=R_{\mathrm{sr}}+{\mathrm{jX}}_{\mathrm{sr}}& \left(11\right)\end{array}$

[0085] As evident from Equations (10) and (11), both Z.sub.pr and Z.sub.sr comprise a resistive component (R.sub.pr, R.sub.sr respectively) and a reactive component (X.sub.pr, X.sub.sr respectively). The resistive components in Z.sub.pr and Z.sub.sr represent the real power transferred between the primary and the secondary sides of the system. The magnitudes of R.sub.pr and R.sub.sr can be controlled through φ.sub.p, φ.sub.s and θ to regulate the amount and direction of power flow as discussed previously. The reactive components, X.sub.pr and X.sub.sr, do not contribute towards real power flow. In IPT systems of the prior art, the reactive components are eliminated by operating the IPT system with a fixed relative phase difference θ of ±90°.

[0086] According to the present invention, the reactive components X.sub.pr, X.sub.sr are, in effect, used to compensate for the changes in the resonant frequency of the primary and/or secondary resonant circuits. For example, variations in the inductance of the primary and secondary magnetic couplers L.sub.pt, L.sub.st may be caused by static or dynamic variations in displacement or alignment therebetween.

[0087] The converter phases φ.sub.p, φ.sub.s or duty cycle in each of the primary and secondary side of the IPT system are controlled to regulate the magnitudes of resistive components R.sub.pr, R.sub.sr of the impedances Z.sub.pr, Z.sub.sr and therefore the power transfer, whereas the relative phase difference θ is controlled to regulate the magnitudes of reactive components X.sub.pr, X.sub.sr to negate changes in reactive impedance. Such changes in reactive impedance may affect the resonant frequency of the resonant compensation networks and thus prevent efficient power transfer. The variations in reactive impedance may be due to a variety of different factors, including but not limited to: changes in the inductance of the primary and/or secondary magnetic couplers L.sub.pt, L.sub.st possibly due to misalignment of magnetic couplers; the presence of foreign (magnetically permeable) objects near one or the magnetic couplers; variations in component tolerances, for example degradation of a capacitor over time.

[0088] As a result, the magnitude and direction of power transfer as well as the amount of compensation can be controlled independently through the phase angles φ.sub.p, φ.sub.s and θ. For example, if the inductances of the primary and secondary magnetic couplers L.sub.pt, L.sub.st decrease beyond their tuned values (i.e. the values selected for tuning the resonant circuit to the operating frequency f.sub.T), θ is controlled to introduce extra inductive reactances in series with the primary and secondary magnetic couplers L.sub.pt, L.sub.st to negate the decrease in inductance of the magnetic couplers. Meanwhile, the converter phase angles φ.sub.p, φ.sub.s can be varied to control the magnitude and direction of power transfer at a desired level. Alternatively, a combination of φ.sub.p, φ.sub.s and θ can also be varied, as appropriate, to meet the required power throughput as well as to compensate for any pad misalignment.

[0089] The proposed compensation can be realised by a controller on either or both of the primary or secondary/pick-up side of the IPT system which detects changes in tuning and controls one or more of φ.sub.p, φ.sub.s and θ in order to mitigate these changes.

[0090] A suitable secondary controller according to one embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG. 4 by way of example. A change in inductance of, in this example, the secondary magnetic coupler L.sub.st is evaluated using measurements of the secondary voltage V.sub.si and current I.sub.si. The evaluation may comprise calculation of the power P by multiplying the voltage V.sub.si and current I.sub.si as shown, for example. The evaluation is then compared with 0.5 to generate an error signal. The value of 0.5 is the value expected if θ is to be set to achieve minimum VA for the example controller shown. However, alternative values may be used if, for example, the objective is to maximise power transfer. The error signal forms an input to a control algorithm, in this case the proportional-integral controller PI. The output of the controller PI drives a voltage controlled oscillator VCO to obtain the phase angle θ required to compensate for changes in the system. This phase-shift is used together with the reference power level P.sub.ref to generate drive signals controlling operation of the converter 122. The phase of the primary IPT apparatus is taken into account in the multiplication of the secondary voltage and current, as the secondary current is related to the primary phase.

[0091] The controllers 111, 121 may be implemented purely in hardware, software, or combinations thereof. The controllers may therefore comprise a microcontroller communicatively coupled with voltage and current sensors and programmed to perform the methods of the invention as described herein by way of example. The electronic circuit design and programming techniques required for this are known to those skilled in the fields of digital electronics and/or embedded systems.

[0092] Waveforms from a simulated IPT system according to the example embodiment of FIGS. 1-4 are shown in FIGS. 5-7. The simulated system comprised LCL resonant circuits tuned to 40 kHz. FIG. 5 shows graphs of both compensated 50 and uncompensated 51 (a) input impedance seen by the primary converter and (b) phase angle θ versus frequency f for a scenario where a 20% change in the inductance of both the primary and secondary magnetic couplers L.sub.pt, L.sub.st has been introduced. In practice, such variations in the inductance of the magnetic couplers may be due to variations in the displacement or alignment therebetween.

[0093] Ideally, the impedance seen by the primary converter should be a purely resistive load at the operating frequency to operate the system at unity power factor. The results illustrated by the solid lines indicate the behaviour of the system without any compensation whereas the results in dotted lines represent the system behaviour when the changes in the magnetic coupler inductances L.sub.pt, L.sub.st are compensated by varying the relative phase angle θ.

[0094] Without compensation, variation of the magnetic coupler inductances L.sub.pt, L.sub.st causes the impedance curves to shift to the left, forcing the resonant frequency to around 38 kHz. The system becomes detuned, as the primary and secondary converters continue to operate at the designed frequency of 40 kHz, while the resonant frequency of the LCL networks has shifted to 38 kHz as a result of changes in the magnetic coupler inductances L.sub.pt, L.sub.st.

[0095] Varying the relative phase angle θ from 90° to 80° in accordance with the methods, apparatus, and systems of the present invention, as shown by the broken line impedance curves in FIG. 5, restores the resonant frequency of the primary and secondary LCL resonant circuits 113, 123 to or towards the original value of 40 kHz, and allows the system to be operated at unity power factor, or at least nearer unity power factor than would otherwise be the case.

[0096] Voltage and current waveforms V.sub.pi, I.sub.pi waveforms obtained from the simulated IPT system with and without compensation according to the present invention are depicted in FIG. 6(a) and FIG. 6(b), respectively. As evident from FIG. 6(a), the current I.sub.pi is lagging the voltage V.sub.pi, indicating that the system is operating under detuned conditions without the compensation of the present invention. Furthermore, it can be observed that the instantaneous power supplied by the primary converter 112 has a negative portion indicating operation below unity power factor. Referring to the compensated waveforms of FIG. 6(b), however, it can be observed that the voltage V.sub.pi and current I.sub.pi are in phase and the system operates at unity power factor.

[0097] The efficiency of the simulated system versus magnetic coupler inductance, with and without the proposed compensation of the present invention, is shown in FIG. 7. It can be observed that the compensation technique significantly improves the efficiency of the IPT system over a wide range of primary and secondary magnetic coupler inductances L.sub.pt, L.sub.st.

[0098] The above example embodiment of the invention comprises a bi-directional IPT system with a full bridge active reversible rectifier/inverter and LCL resonant circuits on both the primary and secondary sides, however the invention is not limited to such a configuration. In other embodiments, the IPT system may comprise a uni-directional (i.e. configured to transfer power in a single direction from the primary to the secondary side) system, an alternative active or passive converter such as a half-bridge or push-pull converter or passive (diode bridge) rectifier, and/or an alternative resonant circuit topology.

[0099] In some embodiments of IPT systems according to the present invention, specifically uni-directional embodiments, the secondary converter may comprise a passive diode bridge rectifier and omit the secondary controller for cost or complexity reasons. The passive rectifier limits the controllability of the magnitude of compensating reactive impedance, but the compensating impedance can still be controlled to some extent by the primary controller and primary converter, at the expense of load regulation at the output of the secondary side.

[0100] In yet other embodiments, the resonant circuit may comprise a series-tuned LC resonant network or a push-pull parallel-resonant converter (PPRC), for example. Simulated waveforms for each of these embodiments are shown in FIGS. 8 and 9, respectively. FIGS. 8(a) and 8(b) respectively show the uncompensated and compensated voltage V.sub.pi, current I.sub.pi, and instantaneous power waveforms for a series-tuned LC resonant network embodiment. FIGS. 9(a) and 9(b) similarly show the respective uncompensated and compensated voltage V.sub.pi and current I.sub.pi waveforms for the PPRC-based embodiment. In both cases it can be observed that the compensation of the present invention restores the voltage V.sub.pi and current I.sub.pi waveforms to being substantially in phase with each other, resulting in an improved power factor and facilitating zero-voltage switching (ZVS).

[0101] In other embodiments, regulation of the output voltage or current may not be required, and the controllers thus need not necessarily be configured to vary the duty cycle of the power converter.

[0102] In yet other embodiments, the relative phase angle between the primary and secondary sides may be varied to control, at least in part, the magnitude of real power transfer. This may involve a compromise between controlling the magnitude of power transfer and compensating for variations in the resonant frequency of the primary and/or secondary resonant circuit. The appropriate balance will depend upon the application.

[0103] The above variations are described merely as non-limiting examples. Further modifications or variations may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention.

[0104] Although the invention has been described by way of example and with reference to possible embodiments thereof, it is to be understood that modifications or improvements may be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention. The invention may also be said broadly to consist in the parts, elements and features referred to or indicated in the specification of the application, individually or collectively, in any or all combinations of two or more of said parts, elements or features. Furthermore, where reference has been made to specific components or integers of the invention having known equivalents, then such equivalents are herein incorporated as if individually set forth.

[0105] From the foregoing it will be seen that a wireless power transfer apparatus, system, and method is provided which effectively compensates for changes in inductance arising from variations in the displacement or alignment of primary and secondary magnetic couplers. The compensation results in improved power factor and efficiency of wireless power transfer. This advantage can be achieved without varying the switching frequency or adding switchable reactive elements and, in at least some embodiments, without compromising load/output regulation.

[0106] Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description, the words “comprise”, “comprising”, and the like, are to be construed in an inclusive sense that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to”, as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense.

[0107] Any discussion of the prior art throughout the specification should in no way be considered as an admission that such prior art is widely known or forms part of common general knowledge in the field.