SHOE INSOLE
20220264995 · 2022-08-25
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
A43B7/142
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A43B17/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A43B7/142
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
[Problem] To provide a shoe insole that can inherently maintain appropriate meshing with foot joints at a high level. [Solution] A sheet section, disposed on the entire base of a shoe, and a support plate, formed from a material harder than the sheet section are provided. The sheet section and the support plate each comprises an inner curved surface section, curved in an arch shape with an end section standing upward, an outer wall section, curved in an arch shape, with an end section standing upward, and a central wall section, formed between the inner wall section and the outer wall section. The support plate comprises an inner ridge section, formed on the boundary between the inner wall section and the central wall section, and an outer ridge section, formed on the boundary between the outer wall section and the central wall section. A plurality of through-holes, arranged in the longitudinal direction of the support plate, are formed in the inner wall section and the outer wall section of the support plate. At least an upper surface of the central wall section located between the inner ridge section and the outer ridge section is curved so as to draw an arch in the longitudinal direction of the support plate.
Claims
1. A shoe insole comprising: a sheet section disposed on an entire base of a shoe, the sheet section including a toe section formed such that the toes of a foot can be disposed therein, a bulged section formed such that tips of metatarsal bones at which the width of the foot protrudes farthest to the left and right can be disposed therein, an arch section formed such that a section of the foot from the metatarsal bones to directly below the lateral malleolus can be disposed therein, and a heel section formed such that a section of the foot from directly below the lateral malleolus to the heel bone rearward of the lateral malleolus can be disposed therein; and a support plate that is adhered to a bottom surface of the arch section and the heel section of the sheet section, and that is formed from a material which is harder than the sheet section, wherein the sheet section and the support plate each comprises in the arch section: an inner wall section curved in an arch shape with an end section standing upward such that at least a first metatarsal bone is disposed therein; an outer wall section curved in an arch shape with an end section standing upward such that at least a fifth metatarsal bone is disposed therein; a central wall section formed between the inner wall section and the outer wall section, the support plate comprises an inner ridge section formed on a boundary between the inner wall section and the central wall section, and an outer ridge section formed on a boundary between the outer wall section and the central wall section, a plurality of through-holes, arranged in the longitudinal direction of the support plate, are formed in the inner wall section and the outer wall section of the support plate, at least an upper surface of the central wall section located between the inner ridge section and the outer ridge section is curved so as to draw an arch in the longitudinal direction of the support plate, and the central rear wall section forms a longitudinal direction arch shape nearly identical to the bottom surface of the central rear wall section of the sheet section and the inner ridge section and the outer ridge section.
2. A shoe insole comprising: a sheet section disposed on an entire base of a shoe, the sheet section including a toe section formed such that the toes of a foot can be disposed therein, a bulged section formed such that tips of metatarsal bones at which the width of the foot protrudes farthest to the left and right can be disposed therein, an arch section formed such that a section of the foot from the metatarsal bones to directly below the lateral malleolus can be disposed therein, and a heel section formed such that a section of the foot from directly below the lateral malleolus to the heel bone rearward of the lateral malleolus can be disposed therein; and a support plate that is adhered to a bottom surface of the arch section and the heel section of the sheet section, and that is formed from a material which is harder than the sheet section, wherein the sheet section and the support plate each comprises in the arch section: an inner wall section curved in an arch shape with an end section standing upward such that at least a first metatarsal bone is disposed therein; an outer wall section curved in an arch shape with an end section standing upward such that at least a fifth metatarsal bone is disposed therein; a central wall section formed between the inner wall section and the outer wall section, the support plate comprises an inner ridge section formed on a boundary between the inner wall section and the central wall section, and an outer ridge section formed on a boundary between the outer wall section and the central wall section a plurality of through-holes, arranged in the longitudinal direction of the support plate, are formed in the inner wall section and the outer wall section of the support plate, at least an upper surface of the central wall section located between the inner ridge section and the outer ridge section is curved so as to draw an arch in the longitudinal direction of the support plate, and the sheet section and the support plate each comprises an extension section that protrudes upward so as to oppose, from a side surface, the heel section located directly below the lateral malleolus and/or a base end section of the arch section.
3. The shoe insole according to claim 1, wherein the support plate is formed with a degree of hardness of from 40D to less than 72D, and is arranged along a bottom surface shape of the sheet section with a fixed thickness.
4. The shoe insole according to claim 1, wherein the support plate is formed with a degree of hardness of from 40D to less than 65D, and is arranged along a bottom surface shape of the sheet section with a fixed thickness.
5. The shoe insole according to claim 1, wherein in the heel section of the support plate, an opening into which a portion of the sheet section is fitted is formed.
6. The shoe insole according to claim 2, wherein the sheet section comprises at least two foamed resin layers having different degrees of hardness and impact resilience coefficients, wherein a first layer on an upper surface side and a second layer provided below the first layer constitute impact resilient resin layers comprising, as a main component, an ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, wherein a measured degree of hardness as measured using an Asker rubber durometer C-type and an impact resilience coefficient as measured according to ISO4662 of the first layer and the second layer satisfy the following relationships: Measured Degree of Hardness: the first layer<the second layer Impact Resilience Coefficient: the first layer<the second layer.
7. The shoe insole according to claim 6, wherein the measured degree of hardness as measured using an Asker rubber durometer C-type of the second layer is 50 to 60, and the impact resilience coefficient as measured according to ISO4662 of the second layer is 55% to 65%.
8. The shoe insole according to claim 6, wherein the measured degree of hardness as measured using an Asker rubber durometer C-type of the first layer is 23 to 28, and the impact resilience coefficient as measured according to ISO4662 of the first layer is 47% to 53%.
9. The shoe insole according to claim 1, wherein the sheet section comprises at least two foamed resin layers having different impact resilience coefficients, wherein a first layer on an upper surface side constitutes a polyurethane foamed resin layer, wherein a second layer provided below the first layer constitutes an impact resilient resin layer comprising, as a main component, an ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, and wherein the measured degree of hardness as measured using an Asker rubber durometer C-type of the second layer is 50 to 60, and the impact resilience coefficient as measured according to ISO4662 of the second layer is 55% to 65%.
10. The shoe insole according to claim 2, wherein the support plate is formed with a degree of hardness of from 40D to less than 72D, and is arranged along a bottom surface shape of the sheet section with a fixed thickness.
11. The shoe insole according to claim 2, wherein the support plate is formed with a degree of hardness of from 40D to less than 65D, and is arranged along a bottom surface shape of the sheet section with a fixed thickness.
12. The shoe insole according to claim 2, wherein in the heel section of the support plate, an opening into which a portion of the sheet section is fitted is formed.
13. The shoe insole according to claim 2, wherein the measured degree of hardness as measured using an Asker rubber durometer C-type of the second layer is 50 to 60, and the impact resilience coefficient as measured according to ISO4662 of the second layer is 55% to 65%.
14. The shoe insole according to claim 2, wherein the sheet section comprises at least two foamed resin layers having different impact resilience coefficients, wherein a first layer on an upper surface side constitutes a polyurethane foamed resin layer, wherein a second layer provided below the first layer constitutes an impact resilient resin layer comprising, as a main component, an ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, and wherein the measured degree of hardness as measured using an Asker rubber durometer C-type of the second layer is 50 to 60, and the impact resilience coefficient as measured according to ISO4662 of the second layer is 55% to 65%.
15. A shoe insole comprising: a sheet section disposed on an entire base of a shoe, the sheet section including a toe section formed such that the toes of a foot can be disposed therein, a bulged section formed such that tips of metatarsal bones at which the width of the foot protrudes farthest to the left and right can be disposed therein, an arch section formed such that a section of the foot from the metatarsal bones to directly below the lateral malleolus can be disposed therein, and a heel section formed such that a section of the foot from directly below the lateral malleolus to the heel bone rearward of the lateral malleolus can be disposed therein; and a support plate that is adhered to a bottom surface of the arch section and the heel section of the sheet section, and that is formed from a material which is harder than the sheet section, wherein the sheet section and the support plate each comprises in the arch section: an inner wall section curved in an arch shape with an end section standing upward such that at least a first metatarsal bone is disposed therein; an outer wall section curved in an arch shape with an end section standing upward such that at least a fifth metatarsal bone is disposed therein; a central wall section formed between the inner wall section and the outer wall section, the support plate comprises an inner ridge section formed on a boundary between the inner wall section and the central wall section, and an outer ridge section formed on a boundary between the outer wall section and the central wall section a plurality of through-holes, arranged in the longitudinal direction of the support plate, are formed in the inner wall section and the outer wall section of the support plate, at least an upper surface of the central wall section located between the inner ridge section and the outer ridge section is curved so as to draw an arch in the longitudinal direction of the support plate, the sheet section comprises at least two foamed resin layers having different degrees of hardness and impact resilience coefficients, wherein a first layer on an upper surface side and a second layer provided below the first layer constitute impact resilient resin layers comprising, as a main component, an ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, wherein a measured degree of hardness as measured using an Asker rubber durometer C-type and an impact resilience coefficient as measured according to ISO4662 of the first layer and the second layer satisfy the following relationships: Measured Degree of Hardness: the first layer<the second layer Impact Resilience Coefficient: the first layer<the second layer.
16. The shoe insole according to claim 15, wherein the support plate is formed with a degree of hardness of from 40D to less than 72D, and is arranged along a bottom surface shape of the sheet section with a fixed thickness.
17. The shoe insole according to claim 15, wherein the support plate is formed with a degree of hardness of from 40D to less than 65D, and is arranged along a bottom surface shape of the sheet section with a fixed thickness.
18. The shoe insole according to claim 15, wherein in the heel section of the support plate, an opening into which a portion of the sheet section is fitted is formed.
19. The shoe insole according to claim 15, wherein the measured degree of hardness as measured using an Asker rubber durometer C-type of the second layer is 50 to 60, and the impact resilience coefficient as measured according to ISO4662 of the second layer is 55% to 65%.
20. The shoe insole according to claim 15, wherein the measured degree of hardness as measured using an Asker rubber durometer C-type of the first layer is 23 to 28, and the impact resilience coefficient as measured according to ISO4662 of the first layer is 47% to 53%.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
[0031] In the following, embodiments of the shoe insole of the present invention shall be explained while referring to the drawings. The dimensions of each portion in the drawings used in the following explanations are not limited to being identical to the actual dimensions, and can be appropriately modified.
[0032] As shown in
[0033] The sheet section 2 includes, from the distal end to the rear end, a toe section 4, a bulged section 5 at which the left-right width is most bulged, an arch section 6, and a heel section 7.
[0034] The toe section 4 is a portion which is formed such that the toes of the foot are disposed therein.
[0035] The bulged section 5 is a portion which is formed such that the tips of the metatarsal bones 50 as shown in
[0036] The heel section 7 is a portion which is formed such that a section of the foot directly below the lateral malleolus 61 to the heel bone 62 rearward of the lateral malleolus 61 as illustrated in
[0037] The arch section 6 is a portion which is formed such that a section of the foot from the metatarsal bones 50 (excluding the bulged section 5) to directly below the lateral malleolus 61 as illustrated in
[0038] The outer shape of the sheet section 2 is formed so as to follow the approximate outer shape of the overall foot in a plan view.
[0039] The arch section 6 of the sheet section 2 includes: an inner wall section 8 formed such that mainly a first metatarsal bone 51 shown in
[0040] In more detail, the inner wall section 8 is a portion that is formed to be curved in an arch shape which protrudes upward with an end section standing smoothly upward such that mainly the first metatarsal bone 51 shown in
[0041] The outer wall section 9 is a portion that is formed to be curved in an arch shape which protrudes upward with an end section standing upward such that mainly the fifth metatarsal bone 55 shown in
[0042] As shown in
[0043] The central rear wall section 10b is formed with an approximately fixed thickness, and the central front wall section 10a is formed to be slightly thicker than the central rear wall section 10b.
[0044] As shown in
[0045] As shown in
[0046] As shown in
[0047] The sheet section 2 is molded from rubber or a synthetic resin, etc., and is preferably formed a soft synthetic resin such as ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA). The sheet section 2 should be formed to have a degree of hardness in the range of 22 to 80 as measured using an Asker rubber durometer (C-type).
[0048] As shown in
[0049] Specifically, the support plate 3 includes the following sections which correspond to the sections of the sheet section 2: an arch section 6′; an inner wall section 8′, an outer wall section 9′, a central front wall section 10a′, and a central rear wall section 10b′ that constitute the arch section 6′; and a heel section 7′. The heel section 7′ of the support plate 3 also has a standing up section 7w′ that surrounds and holds the side surfaces of the heel of the foot.
[0050] The support plate 3 has an inner ridge section 15 and an outer ridge section 16 formed respectively on approximately the boundary between the inner wall section 8′ and the central rear wall section 10b′ and on approximately the boundary between the outer wall section 9′ and the central rear wall section 10b′, i.e. approximately on or along a line L.
[0051] As shown in
[0052] The inner ridge section 15 and the outer ridge section 16 are both formed in a band shape with an approximately fixed width dimension.
[0053] The central front wall section 10a′ of the support plate 3 is formed in the same shape as the sheet section 2, i.e. an approximately flat shape. The central rear wall section 10b′ of the support plate 3 has an approximately fixed thickness overall, and the upper surface and bottom surface thereof form a longitudinal direction arch shape nearly identical to the bottom surface of the central rear wall section 10b of the sheet section 2 and the inner ridge section 15 and the outer ridge section 16.
[0054] As shown in
[0055] In the outer wall section 9′, a plurality of the through-holes 18 are formed spaced apart along the longitudinal direction of the support plate 3. The through-holes 18 formed in the outer wall section 9′ of the support plate 3 are formed so that the protrusions 12 formed on the bottom surface side of the outer wall section 9 of the sheet section 2 can fit therein without any gaps. The bottom surface of the support plate 3 and the top surface of the protrusions 12 are formed so as to be flush with each other.
[0056] In this way, the support plate 3 is formed to match the shape of each section of the sheet section 2, and thereby, as shown in
[0057] In the heel section 7′ of the support plate 3, an opening 19 which absorbs and receives a load applied from the heel is formed.
[0058] The opening 19 is formed approximately parallel to the line L on an inner side 7a′ and an outer side 7b′ of the heel section 7′, and extends slightly inward so as to separate from the line L on a rear side 7c′ of the heel section 7′. Further, on the outside of a distal end side 7d′, the opening 19 expands approaching the central rear wall section 10b′, which gradually warps up diagonally.
[0059] Due to this configuration, it can be anticipated that a load which extends between the heel of the foot and the outside in the width direction of the arch of the foot and which may be applied to the outer tendons and the like, onto which the body weight is prone to be strongly loaded, can be reduced, and the body weight which is applied approximately vertically downward from the lateral malleolus 61 can be softly received.
[0060] In particular, if the thickness of the sheet section 2 is formed to be thin within an allowable range so as to attempt to form the shoe insole 1 to be slim, the support plate 3 fits closer to the sole of the foot, and thus the portions at which the body weight is prone to be loaded, such as the heel and tendons, etc. of the foot, more readily receive the load caused by the hardness of the support plate 3. However, by forming the opening 19 with the shape described above, it can be anticipated that the load on the heels and tendons, on which a large body weight is prone to be loaded, can be effectively reduced, and the fit of the sheet section 2 and the support plate 3 can be highly maintained.
[0061] As shown in
[0062] The central front wall section 10a′ of the support plate 3 is formed to be about 10% thinner than the central rear wall section 10b′ and the heel section 7′, etc. Specifically, the central front wall section 10a′ is formed with a thickness of 1.0 mm to less than 1.9 mm.
[0063] The outer peripheral edge of the support plate 3 and the edges that form the through-holes 18 and the opening 19 are chamfered so as to fit easily to the sheet section 2.
[0064] The inner ridge section 15 and the outer ridge section 16 of the support plate 3 protrude by 0.9 mm to less than 1.1 mm, preferably 1.0 mm, from the top surface of the central rear wall section 10b′ which surrounds them. The inner ridge section 15 and the outer ridge section 16 are both formed to be solid.
[0065] The support plate 3 is formed by a hard resin such as a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). The support plate 3 is formed with a degree of hardness of from 40D to less than 72D, or from 45D to less than 65D, as measured using an Asker rubber durometer (D-type).
[0066] The entirety of the upper surface of the support plate 3 is closely fitted to the bottom surface of the sheet section 2 by compression bonding so that there are no gaps therebetween and the support plate 3 cannot be easily separated from the sheet section 2. The protrusions 11 and 12 and the thick section 13 formed on the sheet section 2 are fitted into the corresponding through-holes 18 and the opening 19 of the support plate 3, and thus are approximately flush with the top surface of the support plate 3.
[0067] The shoe insole 1 of the present invention having the configuration described above achieves the following effects.
[0068] The elastic force of the longitudinal arch of the shoe insole 1 is further increased due to the longitudinal arch shapes having approximately the same curvature of the sheet section 2, the lower end of the inner wall section 8′ and the lower end of the outer wall section 9′ of the support plate 3, the inner ridge section 15, the outer ridge section 16, and the top and bottom surfaces of the central rear wall section 10b′. Further, due to the arch shapes of the inner ridge section 15, the outer ridge section 16, and the central rear wall section 10b′, the central portion in the width direction of the arch of the foot (between the inner longitudinal arch and the outer longitudinal arch) can be flexibly and reliably held in a longitudinal arch shape.
[0069] A longitudinal arch shape is firmly formed in the top and bottom surfaces of the central rear wall section 10b of the sheet section 2, and the inner ridge section 15, the outer ridge section 16, and the upper surface of the central rear wall section 10b′ of the support plate 3 securely retain this longitudinal arch shape. Therefore, any unevenness in the body weight of the thenar eminence and the hypothenar eminence placed on the bulged section 5 and the body weight of the heel placed on the heel section 7 can be prevented. Accordingly, the center of gravity can be guided to the correct position by the shape of the shoe insole 1.
[0070] In addition, the bones and joints of the foot can be appropriately held without forming any unnecessary gaps on the sole of the foot by the aforesaid sections as well as the central convex section 14 formed on the central front wall section 10a of the sheet section 2.
[0071] The first metatarsal bone 51 and the fifth metatarsal bone 55 shown in
[0072] By reciprocally combining the above-described effects, the bones of the foot which are connected by a plurality of joints can be prevented from deviating or distorting, and can be easily retained in an appropriately assembled state. Thus, an effect is achieved in which distortions in the posture based on a deviation in the bones of the foot can be prevented during exercise such as walking.
[0073] Meanwhile, there was a problem with the support plate 3 of the shoe insole 1 of the present invention in that slight pain developed in the foot after use over a long period of time even when the support plate 3 was within the range of hardness of a TPU resin which is generally used in other shoe insoles. This was believed to be likely based on the shape of the support plate 3 of the present invention, but as a result of earnest research focused on this problem, the problem was eliminated by setting the degree of hardness of the support plate 3 to from 40D to 72D.
[0074] As shown in
[0075] Due to the above configuration, an effect is achieved in which supination of the foot (in other words, a movement in which the foot rolls around the little toe side) can be prevented.
[0076] The sheet section 2 may include two foamed resin layers having different degrees of hardness and impact resilience coefficients. A first layer on an upper surface side and a second layer provided below the first layer preferably constitute impact resilient resin layers comprising, as a main component, an ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer.
[0077] Further, the measured degrees of hardness as measured using an Asker rubber durometer (C-type) and the impact resilience coefficients as measured according to ISO4662:2009 of the first layer and the second layer preferably satisfy the following relationships.
[0078] Measured Degree of Hardness: the first layer<the second layer, and
[0079] Impact Resilience Coefficient: the first layer<the second layer
[0080] Specifically, as the first layer, a resin comprising EVA as a main component is used, and in order to adjust the impact resilience coefficient, the first layer can be configured as a resin layer into which impact absorbing materials such as polyethylene, polypropylene, and a silicon resin are mixed.
[0081] More specifically, a resin having a degree of hardness as measured using an Asker rubber durometer (C-type) of 23 to 28, and an impact resilience coefficient as measured according to ISO4662:2009 of 47% to 53%, more preferably 49% to 52%, can be suitably used.
[0082] In addition, the first layer may be a polyurethane foamed resin layer.
[0083] As the second layer, specifically, a resin comprising EVA as a main component is used, and in order to adjust the impact resilience coefficient, a resin obtained by compressing a foamed resin comprising EVA as a main component can be used. More specifically, the degree of hardness as measured using an Asker rubber durometer (C-type) should be 50 to 60, and the impact resilience coefficient as measured according to ISO4662:2009 should be 55% to 65%. Further, the degree of hardness as measured using an Asker rubber durometer (C-type) is preferably 53 to 60, and the impact resilience coefficient as measured according to ISO4662:2009 is preferably 57% to 59%.
[0084] The first layer and the second layer are pressed, and then a sheet layer made of fiber is provided on the top surface of the first layer. In this state, although not limited thereto, the first layer is formed with a thickness of from 0.5 mm to 4.0 mm. Further, although not limited thereto, the second layer is formed with a thickness of from 1.0 mm to 4.0 mm. The second layer may be formed to be thicker at the heel than at the toe, and if the first layer is a polyurethane layer, the first layer and the second layer may both formed to be thicker than in the case that the first layer and the second layer comprise EVA as a main component.
[0085] Due to the above configuration, the second layer is imparted with an appropriate degree of hardness and resilience, and thereby it exerts a cushioning property on the foot. In addition, the first layer is imparted with a low degree of hardness, i.e. flexibility, and low resilience, and thereby the first layer can be firmly retained following the shape of the sole of the foot, and the foot can be softly supported. Accordingly, an effect is achieved in which the skeletal structure of the foot can be held as correctly as possible, and the foot can be effectively protected from impacts thereto.
EXAMPLES
[0086] In the following, the present invention shall be explained in detail using examples, but the scope of the present invention should not be construed as limited to these examples.
Example 1
[0087] A shoe insole as indicated in the above embodiments was produced, comprising the sheet section 2 made of a soft synthetic resin such as ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) and having a degree of hardness as measured using an Asker rubber durometer (C-type) of about 55, and the support plate 3 made of a hard resin such as a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and having a degree of hardness of 40D as measured using an Asker rubber durometer (D-type).
Example 2
[0088] A shoe insole identical to that of Example 1 was produced, except that the degree of hardness of the support plate 3 was 55D as measured using an Asker rubber durometer (D-type).
Example 3
[0089] A shoe insole identical to that of Example 1 was produced, except that the degree of hardness of the support plate 3 was 63.5D as measured using an Asker rubber durometer (D-type).
Comparative Example
[0090] A shoe insole identical to that of Example 1 was produced, except that the degree of hardness of the support plate 3 was 72D (comparative example) as measured using an Asker rubber durometer (D-type).
[0091] (Evaluation Method)
[0092] An adult male A having a height of about 172 cm and a body weight of 75 kg, an adult male B having a height of about 162 cm and a body weight of 53 kg, an adult female C having a height of about 160 cm and a body weight of 52 kg, and an adult female D having a height of about 164 cm and a body weight of 56 kg were made to wear exercise shoes in which the shoe insoles of Examples 1 to 3 and the shoe insole of the comparative example were disposed. The feeling of use was evaluated upon walking on asphalt for about 2 hours. The feeling of use was evaluated regarding (1) the presence/absence of a feeling of support or an uncomfortable feeling in the sole of the foot, (2) the presence/absence of the occurrence of pain in the sole of the foot, and (3) the presence/absence of the occurrence of pain anywhere besides the sole of the foot when walking for no more than 2 hours. In these examples, a “feeling of support” indicates whether there is a sensation that the sole of the foot is being held (retained) by the insole, and an “uncomfortable feeling” indicates localized or overall discomfort. The evaluation results are shown below in Tables 1 to 4.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 EXAMPLE 1 Male A Male B Female C Female D (1) Presence/absence No uncomfortable No uncomfortable No uncomfortable No uncomfortable of feeling of support feeling. Feeling of feeling. feeling. Feeling of feeling. Feeling of or uncomfortable support slightly support felt support slightly feeling in sole weak. somewhat weak in weak. heel and arch of foot. (2) Presence/absence Slight fatigue in None in particular. Slight feeling of pain None in particular. of pain in sole overall sole of foot. in root of middle toe and fourth toe on one foot. (3) Presence/absence None in particular. Felt fatigue in thigh None in particular. None in particular. of pain anywhere and calf. besides sole
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 EXAMPLE 2 Male A Male B Female C Female D (1) Presence/absence Felt appropriate Felt appropriate Felt appropriate Felt appropriate of feeling of support amount of support. amount of support. amount of support. amount of support. or uncomfortable No uncomfortable No uncomfortable No uncomfortable No uncomfortable feeling in sole feeling. feeling. feeling. feeling. (2) Presence/absence Experienced no Experienced no Experienced no Experienced no of pain in sole fatigue at about 2 fatigue at about 2 fatigue at about 2 fatigue at about 2 hours. hours. hours. hours. (3) Presence/absence Experienced no Experienced no Experienced no Experienced no of pain anywhere fatigue at about 2 fatigue at about 2 fatigue at about 2 fatigue at about 2 besides sole hours. hours. hours. hours.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 EXAMPLE 3 Male A Male B Female C Female D (1) Presence/absence Felt slightly No uncomfortable Felt like heel was Felt slightly of feeling of support uncomfortable in heel feeling in particular. being held uncomfortable in or uncomfortable and forward inner immediately upon arch of foot. feeling in sole side. wearing shoe, and felt a close fit over entire sole. (2) Presence/absence Was able to use Felt pain due to None in particular. Experienced a very of pain in sole without any problems chafing at edge slight sensation of for around 2 hours, portion of heel cup. pain and but started to feel uncomfortable slight pain once a feeling. long period (over 2 hours) had elapsed. (3) Presence/absence Experienced no None in particular. None in particular. None in particular. of pain anywhere fatigue at about 2 besides sole hours.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 COMP. EX. Male A Male B Female C Female D (1) Presence/absence Felt uncomfortable Felt uncomfortable in Experienced a feeling Felt uncomfortable of feeling of support on front inner side of sustentaculum tali. of a foreign object immediately upon or uncomfortable heel bone. Felt pressure on sole being present at wearing shoe. Arch feeling in sole of foot. location near space felt stiff. between arch of foot and heel. (2) Presence/absence Felt uncomfortable at Upon walking, felt Felt pain after about Felt slight numbness of pain in sole front inner side of pain due to chafing at 15 minutes, and this after about 10 heel bone at about 1 edge portion of heel pain continued for minutes. Felt pain hour of use. Felt pain cup. about 25 minutes after about 30 at same location soon thereafter. minutes, and could after. not walk naturally. (3) Presence/absence Experienced no Experienced no None in particular. None in particular. of pain anywhere fatigue at about 2 fatigue at about 2 besides sole hours. hours.
[0093] In the evaluation results shown in Tables 1 to 4, the shoe insole in which the support plate 3 had a degree of hardness of 40D did not cause an uncomfortable feeling, but the feeling of support was slightly weak.
[0094] The shoe insole in which the support plate 3 had a degree of hardness of 55D exhibited a good feeling of support without any uncomfortable feelings, and did not readily cause pain in the sole of the foot. Further, since this shoe insole also did not readily cause pain in other areas besides the sole of the foot, it can be surmised that the shape of the sole of the foot was satisfactorily retained.
[0095] The shoe insole in which the support plate 3 had a degree of hardness of 63.5D provided a feeling of support, but also caused slightly uncomfortable feelings, and caused pain in the sole of the foot after a prolonged period of use.
[0096] The shoe insole in which the support plate 3 had a degree of hardness of 72D was prone to cause uncomfortable feelings, and caused pain in the sole of the foot even after use over a short period.
REFERENCE SIGNS LIST
[0097] 1: shoe insole [0098] 2: sheet section [0099] 3: support plate [0100] 4: toe section [0101] 5: bulged section [0102] 6: arch section [0103] 7: heel section [0104] 8: inner wall section [0105] 9: outer wall section [0106] 10: central wall section [0107] 10a: central front wall section [0108] 10b: central rear wall section [0109] 13: thick section (portion of sheet section) [0110] 14: central convex section [0111] 15: inner ridge section [0112] 16: outer ridge section [0113] 18: through-hole [0114] 19: opening