System and method for desalination
09815715 · 2017-11-14
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
C02F1/46104
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C02F1/4604
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
Abstract
A system and method of desalination that utilizes a channel formed by a series of opposed rails where the series of opposed rails determines the length of the channel and the distance between opposed rails determines the width of the channel. Non-adjacent rails along the length of the channel are electrically coupled in a pattern and they are sequentially energized to create a potential voltage between opposed pairs of rails that attract ions towards them when ionized water flows through the channel.
Claims
1. A method of desalinating water comprising: providing a channel through which water can flow, the channel having a length and a width, the channel formed by a series of opposed rails wherein the series of opposed rails determines the length of the channel and the distance between opposed rails determines the width of the channel; electrically coupling non-adjacent rails along the length of the channel in a pattern; providing a nonconductive, impermeable barrier over the series of opposed rails along a surface facing an interior of the channel; flowing ionized water through the channel; sequentially energizing electrically coupled pairs of opposed rails from the series of opposed rails to create a potential voltage therebetween, the energized rails forming charge collection surfaces that attract ions towards them when ionized water flows through the channel; removing a stream of concentrate water containing a majority of ions; and collecting deionized water.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the potential voltage is 300 volts.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the pattern is every third rail is electrically coupled together.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of sequentially energizing occurs at a rate of about 20 Hz to 20 KHz.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein each one of a pair of opposed rails to energized to 150 volts.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the length of the channel is divided into an ion depletion zone and an ion removal zone wherein in the ion depletion zone the concentration of ions is reduced as the water flows along the ion depletion zone.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of sequentially energizing the electrically coupled pairs of opposed rails creates an engine that moves ions along the channel faster than the flow of water.
8. The method of claim 6 wherein the ion removal zone is tapered to increase the velocity of the water flow through that zone.
9. An apparatus for desalinating water comprising: a channel having a length and a width, the channel formed by a series of opposed rails wherein the series of opposed rails determines the length of the channel and the distance between opposed rails determines the width of the channel; a plurality of electrical busses coupled to the series of opposed rails wherein each bus couples non-adjacent rails along the length of the channel in a pattern; a nonconductive, impermeable barrier over the series of opposed rails along a surface facing an interior of the channel; a processor programmed to sequentially energizing electrically coupled pairs of opposed rails from the series of opposed rails to create a potential voltage there between, the energized rails forming charge collection surfaces that attract ions towards them when water flows through the channel.
10. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the potential voltage is 200 volts.
11. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the pattern is every third rail is electrically coupled together.
12. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the processor is programmed to sequentially energize the electrically coupled pairs of opposed rails at a rate of about 20 Hz to 20 KHz.
13. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein each one of a pair of opposed rails is energized to 150 volts.
14. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the channel comprises an ion depletion zone and an ion removal zone wherein the ion depletion zone the concentration of ions is reduced as the water flows along the ion depletion zone.
15. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the ion removal zone is tapered to increase the velocity of the water that flows through that zone.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(14)
(15) Only two opposed rails 14 and 16, i.e. charge collection surfaces, are illustrated. As will be described with the respect to other drawings, the embodiments of the present invention utilize a series of opposed rails to form a channel through which the water flows and the series of rails are sequentially energized to drive the ions along the channel faster than the flow of the water through the channel.
(16) The fluid to be deionized flows through the channel past the two rails. The rails are electrodes with electrode 14 positively charged and electrode 16 negatively charged to create a potential difference therebetween. The positively charged electrode 14 attracts negative ions toward the upper portion of the channel towards electrode 14 and the negatively charged electrode 16 attracts the positive ions toward the bottom portion of the channel towards electrode 16. Preferably, each electrode 14, 16 is charged respectively to 150 volts thereby creating a potential voltage of 300 volts therebetween. Of course, other voltage levels may be used.
(17) The charged electrodes 14, 16 are isolated from the fluid stream by nonconductive, impermeable barriers which insulate the electrodes from the fluid thereby preventing arcing and protecting the electrodes from fouling by the ions. Preferably, the barriers are waterproof and are dielectrics.
(18)
(19) As previously mentioned, the charged electrodes produce an electromagnetic attraction of the ions towards the respective charged electrode.
(20) The rate at which the sequential actuation occurs is preferably faster than the flow of water. For example, it may range from about 20 Hz to about 20 kHz. The optional frequency will be dependent upon the concentration of volts, the velocity of water flowing through the system, and the gap between the layers.
(21) The sequential actuation creates an engine that draws the respective ions along the channel faster than the flow of water for a given starting point. As previously mentioned, the channel is divided into the ion depletion zone and the ion removal zone. In particular, section 30 is the ion depletion zone and section 32 is the ion removal zone.
(22) The charges on the rails are synchronized so that every third rail is charged at the same time for a prescribed amount of time. Then, those rails are turned off and the adjacent three rails are charged for the same prescribed amount of time and the pattern continues down the channel and repeats itself over and over. The effect of the sequentially charging the rails is that a linear engine is created that forces the ions to move along the channel faster than the flow of water. As seen in
(23) Connected to the ion depletion zone is the ion removal zone as shown in
(24) The deionized fluid is removed at the end of the ion depletion zone before the ion removal section as illustrated in
(25) The flexible circuit may be incorporated into various shapes. It may be a linear section as shown in
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32) The embodiments of the present invention provide several benefits over currently available desalination techniques. First, unlike reverse osmosis techniques, no permeable membranes are required. These membranes require high pressure and hence high energy and costs to reduce salt concentration. Additionally, they are highly susceptible to oxidation and will degrade rapidly if exposed to chlorine or any other oxidation agent. Because of this, bacteria is always a concern. Our system uses electrostatic forces to remove the salts from the water. The amount of power required to generate these electrostatic forces is far lower than what it takes to pressurize a reverse osmosis system. We estimate that greater than 95% reduction of power will result. Additionally, because our design is not susceptible to oxidation, we have the added benefit of using chlorine or other oxidation agents to limit bacteria growth and contamination.
(33) Other embodiments of the claimed invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the inventions disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the inventions being indicated by the following claims.