An Open Die Forging Process for Minimizing End Losses and a Product Made Using it
20170266715 · 2017-09-21
Assignee
Inventors
- Babasaheb Neelkanth Kalyani (Mundhwa Pune Maharashtra, IN)
- Shreyans Subhash Khot (Mundhwa Pune Maharashtra, IN)
- Madan Umakant Takale (Mundhwa Pune Maharashtra, IN)
- Valmik Vitthal Bhavar (Mundhwa Pune Maharashtra, IN)
- Manoj Rajendra Ukhande (Mundhwa Pune Maharashtra, IN)
Cpc classification
B21J5/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F16K27/044
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B21J1/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B21K3/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B21J1/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B21J5/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The invention discloses a process of manufacturing heavy and critical components such as a blowout preventer (BOP) with a combination of open die forging, piercing and machining process which results in to better material utilization and saving in the machining time. The forging process of the invention involves a step of notching, wherein a transverse notch is made near each end of the ingot before cogging said ingot. The invention allows development of safety and critical components with effective material utilisation.
Claims
1. An open die forging process for minimizing end losses characterised in that said forging process involves a step of notching, wherein a transverse notch with angular tip is made near each end of the ingot before cogging said ingot.
2. The open die forging process as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that said process comprises the steps of forming a fluted ingot, drawing the ingot and upsetting it, before forming said notches at said ends of said upset ingot,
3. The open die forging process as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that said process further comprises the steps of cogging and cutting into two pieces for further processing such as piercing said pieces, semi machining and machining to final products.
4. A blow-out preventer for use in oil and gas made using the open die forging process as claimed in claim 1.
5. The open die forging process as claimed in claim 2, characterised in that said process further comprises the steps of cogging and cutting into two pieces for further processing such as piercing said pieces, semi machining and machining to final products.
6. A blow-out preventer for use in oil and gas made using the open die forging process as claimed in claim 2.
7. A blow-out preventer for use in oil and gas made using the open die forging process as claimed in claim 3.
8. A blow-out preventer for use in oil and gas made using the open die forging process as claimed in claim 5.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
[0035] The invention discloses a process of manufacturing a large and complex forged part. In particular, the invention also discloses a process of manufacturing the blowout preventer (see
[0036] During a typical manufacturing process involving forging of such large and complex parts (see
[0037] In one aspect of the invention, the process of cogging is carried out without formation of fishtails at the ends. This is achieved by forming notches near the ends of the cogged billet (see
[0038] Optimization of a forging process is highly desirable in saving material during a manufacturing process. A key aspect of such optimization is to invent a process in which the initial volume of material used for the product is very close to the final volume of the product. The present invention discloses an optimized forging process for BOPs by using open die forging technique with a particular emphasis on minimizing the machining resources and initial ingot weight.
[0039] The material flow behavior at centre region as well as surface region of cogged billet studied and analyzed using 3D metal flow simulation software.
[0040] Conventional manufacturing process of a large and complex part such as a BOP is shown in
[0041] Based on simulation results, the inventors have found an optimal manufacturing methodology for a large and complex part such as a BOP. This involves adding stages of notching and piercing in between the open die forging and machining stages of the process.
[0042] The process of the invention starts with a fluted ingot which is drawn into a desired shape after which it is subjected to upsetting and cogging to bring it into a desired shape. This shaped component is next cut into two pieces as shown in
[0043] Piercing operation is found particularly useful for large forged parts such as a blow-out preventer that is used in oil exploration industry. Piercing rather than machining creates favourable grain flow lines and a much stronger final part.
[0044] It is evident from the foregoing discussion that the present invention has the following embodiments: [0045] 1. An open die forging process for minimizing end losses characterised in that said forging process involves a step of notching, wherein a transverse notch is made near each end of the ingot before cogging said ingot. [0046] 2. An open die forging process as disclosed in embodiment 1, characterised in that said process comprises the steps of forming a fluted ingot, drawing the ingot and upsetting it, before forming said notches at said ends of said upset ingot. [0047] 3. An open die forging process as disclosed in embodiments 1 and 2, characterised in that said process further comprises the steps of cogging and cutting into two pieces for further processing such as piercing said pieces, semi machining and machining to final products. [0048] 4. A product made using open die forging method as disclosed in any of the embodiments 1 to 3.
[0049] While the above description contains much specificity, these should not be construed as limitation in the scope of the invention, but rather as an exemplification of the preferred embodiments thereof. It must be realized that modifications and variations are possible based on the disclosure given above without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined not by the embodiments illustrated, but by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.