SINGLE LEAD WEDGETHREAD CONNECTION
20170321826 · 2017-11-09
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
F16L15/001
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16L25/08
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16L15/004
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16L25/10
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F16L15/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16L15/06
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16L25/08
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
An affordable family of threaded pipe connections is disclosed, that have desired strengths and service torques, for a wide range of sizes and services.
Claims
1. A screw thread form having a radial thread depth (29) and an axial thread pitch (8), comprising: The thread depth being more than 30 percent but less than 50 percent of the axial thread pitch.
2. The screw thread form of claim 1, further comprising: The thread depth being substantially 40 percent of the axial thread pitch.
3. The screw thread form of claim 2 also having a load flank (34) and a load flank radial bearing width (33), comprising: The radial bearing width being substantially one-third of the axial pitch.
4. A thread form having a crest (35); a stab flank (32); a stab flank guide surface (44) positioned at guide angle (39) with respect to the connection centerline (43); further comprising: The guide angle being larger than the angle of friction that acts between the mating threads, but less than 40 degrees.
5. The thread form of claim 4 also having a load flank guide surface (46) positioned at guide angle (45) with respect to the connection centerline (43); further comprising: The guide angle being larger than the angle of friction that acts between the mating threads, but less than 40 degrees.
6. The screw thread form of claim 3 also having a root (37), an included angle (30) between the flanks, the thread flanks having a rated bearing pressure, comprising: The included angle being dimensioned large enough to limit flank bearing pressure to within the rated bearing pressure when at rated load; The included angle being dimensioned small enough to cause a flank bearing load sufficient to effect a predetermined makeup torque upon connection assembly.
7. The thread form of claim 4 also having a maximum allowable angle of misalignment (52) between the pin and box during their assembly, further comprising: The guide angle being greater than the maximum rated angle of misalignment plus the angle of friction.
8. A pipe connection pin (2) having pin threads (10), pin thread OD at face (60), pin root diameter (9), crest diameter at face (60), the connection also having box (3) formed with tapered threads (10) to mate with the pin threads, box OD (3), box swaged ID (26), comprising: The pin being swaged down to the smallest OD within pipe OD tolerance and the pin ID being formed substantially equal to the average of the pipe drift diameter and the nominal pipe ID; the pin thread root diameter substantially running out at the pin OD; The box ID being swage out to substantially the pin crest diameter at face; the box thread root running out in the swaged box ID; the engaged thread length extending from the pin OD to the box ID.
9. A family of pipe connection groups in accord with claim 3, further comprising: Each group having like flank angles but different flank angles than other groups within the family, as necessary to prevent flank yield stresses and excessive box or pin hoop stresses and to provide maximum service ratings at minimum cost.
10. The family of claim 9 wherein the threads have a stab flank angle (21), a load flank angle (31), the stab flank angle plus the load flank angle being an included angle (30), the threads being dimensioned such that when mating flanks are in contact upon makeup, the connection has a yield torque at which the flanks will yield in bearing, the flanks being coated with a thread dope having a selected COF, comprising: The included angle and dope COF being selected to attain a makeup torque of more than one-third but less than two-thirds, of the flank yield torque.
11. A family of pipe connections in accord with claim 9 having a pin (2) and a box (3) with a pin thread (10) being loaded radially against a box thread (28) upon assembly with a predetermined radial load, the connection having a rated axial load, comprising: The flank angles and diameters being dimensioned to withstand all rated loads without there being relative movement between the box and pin threads.
12. The family of pipe connections of claim 10, further comprising: The flank angles being dimensioned large enough to prevent radial flank loads from exerting a flank stress that exceeds the material yield stress.
13. A family of pipe connections in accord with claim (9) further comprising: Threads for pipe sizes 4.5″ through 5.5″ having flank angles larger than 20 but less than 30 degrees; Threads for pipe sizes 5.5″ through 7.625″ having flank angles larger than 15 degrees but less than 25; Threads for pipe sizes 8.625″ and larger having flank angles larger than 10 but less than 20 degrees.
14. A threaded pipe connection having a box (3) with tapered box threads (28) and a box face (22); the connection also having a pin (2) with tapered pin threads (10) dimensioned to mate with the box threads, radial interference existing between the mating threads, the box wall being thicker at the pin face that at the box face, comprising: More radial thread interference existing between the mating threads at the pin face than at box face; Interference at the pin face being sufficient to seal rated Internal fluid pressure but less than flank yield pressure; Interference at box face not being great enough to over stress the box wall when at rated pressures.
15. The pipe connection of claim 9 having a thread form in accord with claim 4.
16. The pipe connection of claim 9 having a thread form in accord with claim 5.
17. The pipe connection of claim 9 having a thread form in accord with claim 6.
18. The pipe connection of claim 9 being in accord with claim 7.
19. Families of threaded pipe connections, each family being within a specific wall thickness/diameter range, all threads within that family having an optimum thread form for that range.
20. A threaded connection In accord with claims (1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, and 20), having a taper, further comprising: The taper being greater than 7/100 inch per axial inch.
21. A threaded connection in accord with claims (1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, and 20) having a taper, further comprising: The taper being 14/100 inch per axial inch.
22. A family of threaded pipe connections of claim (13) having a thread lead (50) and a maximum allowable angle of alignment (52) between the box and pin during assembly, further comprising: The thread lead being not less than, the thread diameter multiplied by the tangent of the specified maximum allowable angle of misalignment.
23. A screw thread form having a radial thread depth; an axial thread pitch; a crest; a stab flank; a stab flank guide surface; positioned at a guide angle with respect to the connection centerline; a pipe connection pin having pin threads; a pin thread O.D., a pin root diameter and a pin crest diameter at the pin face; a box formed with tapered threads to mate with the pin threads; a box O.D.; a box swage I.D.; radial interference existing between the mating threads; the box wall being thicker at the pin face than at the box face; the connection being in a family of pipe connections having a maximum angle of misalignment between the box and pin during assembly, further comprising: The thread depth being more than 30 percent but less than 50 percent of the axial thread pitch. The guide angle being larger than the angle of friction that acts between the mating threads, but less than 40 degrees. The pin being swaged down to the smallest OD within pipe OD tolerance and the pin ID being formed substantially equal to the average of the pipe drift diameter and the nominal pipe ID; the pin thread root diameter substantially running out at the pin OD; The box ID being swage out to substantially the pin crest diameter at face; the box thread root running out in the swaged box ID; the engaged thread length extending from the pin OD to the box ID. More radial thread interference existing between the mating threads at the pin face than at box face; Interference at the pin face being sufficient to seal rated internal fluid pressure but less than flank yield pressure; Interference at box face not being great enough to over stress the box wall when at rated pressures. All threads within that family having an optimum thread form for that range. The thread lead being not less than, the thread diameter multiplied by the tangent of the specified maximum allowable angle of misalignment.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0018] The Screw thread form shown in FIG. (2) has an axial thread pitch (8) and a radial thread depth (29) that is at least 30% but not more than 50% of the axial thread pitch, which provides a most efficient thread form for steel threads because the thread flank axial bearing strength substantially equals the thread axial shear strength at the pitch diameter. When threads are made of other materials, the ratio of the thread depth/pitch may be different for the shear strength to equal the flank bearing strength. The thread form may also have a load flank (34) and a load flank bearing width (33) the load flank bearing width being substantially ⅓ of the axial pitch. Guide surfaces (44, 46) may be formed between the flanks and crests (35) on guide angle (45) to prevent contact between mating threads at extreme pressure angles. The guide angles measured from the connection centerline (43) are greater than the angle of friction that acts between mating threads and preferably, greater than the angle of friction plus the maximum misalignment allowed between the pin and box during assembly but less than 40 degrees. The included angle (30) between flanks is large enough to limit flank bearing pressure to less than pipe yield stress but small enough to cause a torque within a desired range.
[0019] As shown in
[0020] For a given pipe material, the torque required to assemble a flank wedging connection under standard conditions to a desired makeup position as shown in
[0021] Cross-threading of mating threads while stabbing has been a problem for hundreds of years since screw threads were first invented, but the present invention now solves that problem. Based on the specified maximum misalignment angle (52) shown in
[0022] Another teaching of this invention is to set the minimum Number of Engaged Threads=(the pipe wall max thickness)/(the thread form bearing width)+ROT; (where ROT=number of Run-out threads at necks.) when a full-strength connection is wanted on non-upset pipe, or any portion thereof for lower strength connections. The pin OD may be swaged down to the minimum API allowable pipe OD and bored to a Pin ID=(pipe nominal ID+Pipe drift diameter)/2 which provides the minimum OD pin for a full strength full bore connection. If twice the minimum practical pin face width (23) is added to pin ID (4), then the minimum practical root diameter (24) at the pin face is quantified, and the Max practical thread taper for a given pipe thread then equals the (pin OD—face root diameter)/(Required Thread length) for a run-out thread, regardless of the pipe material strength. For a family of pipe connections, the maximum and minimum pipe wall thicknesses and the minimum practical pin face width can be used to find a suitable common thread taper for each group.
[0023] The minimum pin crest diameter (60) may be used as the coupling ID to calculate the minimum coupling OD (3) for both pressure and mechanical loads, which in fact, provides a full pipe wall thickness. Radial thread interference may be calculated=0.7*Y/E*(Pipe OD) to attain full strength under all service loads.
[0024] With the above factors known, the optimum make-up torque of an efficient connection may be determined by selection of a dope COF and the Included angle, knowing that the smaller the included angle, the higher the flank psi and the torque. As taught above, a dope having a high COF can be used if a connection's power makeup with that dope does not require enough interference turns that would generate enough heat to cause galling. Therefore, inexpensive dopes with COF's such as 0.10, (5 times the COF of API 5A2 dope) may be used, that don't contain environmentally offensive solid particles in the dope to reduce friction. A higher COF of the solid particles also improves sealing of the fluids because such solid particles resist extrusion through thread gaps by service pressures. Thread interference at the box face may set be less than at the pin face, if the hoop stress at the box face under rated pressure exceeds the allowable stress after which, the average interface psi over the engaged thread length may be found. Then multiplying the conical thread area by that average psi will determine the total radial interface force between box/pin flanks, and dividing that load by tangent of the flank angles (or tangent averages if flank angles not equal) will determine the total flank axial load that causes makeup friction. Finally, multiplying the (friction load *COF/24* the average thread pitch diameter) determines the ft-lb makeup torque. If the same formulas are rearranged and a desired torque is inserted, the minimum allowable flank angle may be found for a given connection, or averaged for a group of sizes. The threads will seal easily because solids in the dope required to seal need not have a low COF, so they can be selected from soft, low cost, high COF, temperature resistant, chemical attack resistant solids such as Talc, and their high COF will additionally, lend great resistance to their being extruded by the fluid pressure. However, auxiliary seals may be provided when necessary to satisfy specific service codes. To insure against a tension load being able to cause axial movement between box and pin threads, leakage and/or pull-out, the total radial load acting between mating threads should be divided by the pipe axial yield load to find the arc tangent of a maximum allowable load flank angle. The rounded-off average of minimum and maximum flank angles of a family group of connections within a practical size range may be adopted as the flank angle for that group. When designing a pipe connection, the required length of engaged threads to attain a desired mechanical rating will vary closely with the pipe wall thickness, so such as 6 TPI with a small thread depth may be independently selected as best suited for 4″ and smaller pipe which generally have thinner walls, and such as 4, 3, or 2 TPI may be selected for progressively larger pipe sizes.
[0025] Each size connection has a minimum and a maximum workable flank angle. The max flank angle allowable=ATN(total radial force between threads/pipe yield load) to prevent leakage and/or pull-out of the pin from the box. The flank angle must both seal and provide the torque required without yielding flanks under any combination of rated loads.
[0026] Should the hoop stress in the pin end when under rated external pressure exceed the yield stress of the material, then either the external service pressure rating must be reduced or the wall thickness of the box face must be increased. If the box face hoop stress is excessive when under internal pressure, the thread interference at the box face may be reduced by increasing the box face PD, which increases the box thread taper providing, the reduced interface thread pressure is still high enough to withstand end loads, strengths and service torques, for a wide range of sizes and services.