TREATMENT OF CANCER
20170319638 · 2017-11-09
Inventors
Cpc classification
C12N7/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
A61K35/17
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K39/39
HUMAN NECESSITIES
C12N2710/16621
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
A61K2300/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K2300/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61P35/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
G01N33/50
PHYSICS
C12N7/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
A method of treating cancer in a subject is disclosed, the method comprising administration of an oncolytic herpes simplex virus and administration of lymphocyte cells modified to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) or modified to express a T cell receptor (TCR).
Claims
1. A method of treating cancer in a subject, the method comprising administration of an oncolytic herpes simplex virus and administration of human lymphocyte cells modified to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) or modified to express a T cell receptor (TCR).
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the lymphocyte cells are T-cells.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the T-cells are cytotoxic T-cells, CD8+ T cells or CD4+ T cells.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the cancer is a solid tumor.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the CAR or TCR targets an antigen selected from the group consisting of GD2, CD44v7/8, DNAM-1 (DNAX accessory molecule-1), EGP-40 (epithelial glycoprotein-40), EpCAM (endothelial cell adhesion molecule), FBP (folate-binding protein), FR, GD3, VEGFR2, LMP-1 (latent membrane protein 1), MUC1 (mucin 1), PSCA (prostate stem cell antigen), α-folate receptor, CD171, CAIX, Her2, IL13Rα2, IL13R, IL3RA, CEA, CD19, CD20, Lewis-Y, CD33, CD38 (also known as cyclic ADP ribose hydrolase), CD123, gp100, MART1, CEA, CAIX, Her2//Neu, MAGE-A3/A19/A12, MAGE-A3/titin, CD19, GD2, NY-ESO-1, CTAG1B, MAGE-A1, MAGE-C1, SSX2, MAGE-A2B, Brachyury, NY-BR1, BCMA, KRAS (e.g. KRAS G13D, KRAS G12V, KRAS G12R, KRAS G12D, KRAS G12C), KIT, PD-L1, EGFRviii, HPV 16 E6, HPV 16 E7, HPV18 E6, HPV18 E7 and other tumor associated antigens
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the administration of the oncolytic herpes simplex virus and lymphocyte cells is simultaneous or sequential.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the oncolytic herpes simplex virus is administered to the blood.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the oncolytic herpes simplex virus is administered by intratumoral injection.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the administration of human lymphocyte cells is part of a method of autologous therapy.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the oncolytic herpes simplex virus does not express, or is not modified to express, a cytokine or chemokine.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the oncolytic herpes simplex virus does not contain, or is not modified to contain, nucleic acid encoding at least one copy of a polypeptide that is heterologous to the virus.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the oncolytic herpes simplex virus is an HSV-1 strain 17+ or mutant thereof.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the oncolytic HSV is HSV1716.
14. A method of increasing the efficacy of adoptive cell therapy in a subject by administering an oncolytic herpes simplex virus to a subject in need thereof.
15. A kit comprising at least one container having a predetermined quantity of oncolytic herpes simplex virus, and at least one container having a predetermined quantity of human lymphocytes modified to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) or T cell receptor (TCR).
16. The kit of claim 15, wherein the oncolytic herpes simplex virus and lymphocytes are in separate containers.
17. The kit of claim 15, wherein the kit comprises a container having a mixture of a predetermined quantity of oncolytic herpes simplex virus and predetermined quantity of human lymphocytes.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0176] The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
[0177] Embodiments and experiments illustrating the principles of the invention will now be discussed with reference to the accompanying figures in which:
[0178]
[0179]
[0180]
[0181]
[0182] Mice Received 2×10.sup.6 B78D14 Cells on day 0, 500cGy TBI on day 6, and 4×10.sup.6 GD2-28z CAR T cells or mock T cells on day 7. CD8+CAR Persistence (A), tumor size (B), and percent survival (C) was measured.
[0183]
[0184]
[0185]
[0186]
[0187]
[0188]
[0189]
[0190]
[0191]
[0192]
[0193]
[0194]
[0195]
[0196]
[0197]
[0198]
[0199]
[0200]
[0201]
[0202]
[0203]
[0204]
[0205]
[0206]
[0207]
[0208]
[0209]
[0210]
[0211]
[0212]
[0213]
[0214]
EXAMPLES
Example 1—Evaluation of Attenuated HSV1716 in Combination with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells for Solid Tumors
[0215] Neuroblastoma, osteosarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma are among the most prevalent childhood solid tumors. Each of these tumor types as well as melanomas exhibit increased levels of the tumor associated carbohydrate, GD2 on their cell surface making them ideal targets for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell-directed therapies. Despite the ability of GD2 CAR T Cells to target GD2-expressing tumor cells in vitro, there is great interest in improving tumor clearance in vivo, especially for solid tumors where current outcomes remain poor. We hypothesize that the immunosuppressive milieu present within the solid tumor microenvironment serves as a major factor limiting the effectiveness of GD2 CAR T cells and propose that administration of oncolytic viruses could induce inflammation within the tumor microenvironment that may enhance, rather than inhibit, the effectiveness of immune based therapies. GD2 CAR T cells composed of the 14G2a Single chain variable fragment linked to the cytoplasmic signalling domains of CD28 and CD3 zeta (GD2-28z) were expressed in murine lymphocytes and evaluated for the ability to target and lyse GD2-expressing tumor cells. Additionally GD2-28z T cells were co-cultured with tumor cells to access their ability to secrete proinflammatory cytokines IFNγ and IL-2. In order to determine the oncolytic ability of attenuated HSV1716, tumor cells were cultured in the presence or absence of HSV1716 and relative cell survival was measured. We observed specific lysis of GD2-expressing tumor cells when co-cultured with GD2-28z, but not mock T cells. Furthermore, GD2-28z T cells secrete IFNγ and IL-2 following co-culture with GD2-expressing tumor cells. Interestingly, melanoma cell lines were not susceptible to oncolytic lysis while rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) cell lines were susceptible. Using a melanoma model, GD2-28z T cells displayed anti-tumor activity. The combination of GD2-28z and HSV1716 enhanced CAR persistence in a melanoma model. Given that the melanoma cells in our model are not susceptible to oncolytic lysis yet we observe an increased T cell persistence when used in combination with HSV1716, this supports our hypothesis that HSV1716 in inducing inflammation, which is then triggering T cell expansion.
[0216] Results are shown in
[0217] Our results showed that GD2 CAR T cells target GD2+ tumor cells in vitro and in vivo, and delay tumor growth. HSV1716 oncolytically lyses nectin 1-expressing cells, enhances GD2 CAR persistence in vivo, and delays tumor growth.
Example 2—Oncolytic Virotherapy-Enhanced Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Pediatric Solid Tumors
[0218] While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have shown remarkable anticancer efficacy in patients with relapsed and refractory lymphoid leukemias, their effectiveness in patients with solid tumors has thus far been disappointing. Trials of treatment in solid tumors have shown little clinical success, with modest homing to tumors and lack of CAR persistence. These findings may be attributed to the immunosuppressive microenvironment characteristic of solid tumors. Oncolytic virotherapy is a promising platform which may potentiate the competence of CAR T-cells within solid tumors. Oncolytic viruses specifically amplify in malignant tissues and cause tumor-specific cell death not only through direct cell lysis, but also through the induction of an immunologic response. This mechanism suggests that oncolytic virotherapy may be a useful strategy to reverse the immune-escape tactics of solid tumors and augment the effects of directed T-cell therapies. We sought to determine whether the use of oncolytic Herpes Simplex virotherapy (oHSV) might enhance the efficacy of CAR T-cells in pediatric solid tumors. HSV1716 (trade name Seprehvir, Virttu Biologics, Ltd., Glasgow, U.K.) is a mutant Herpes Simplex-1 virus that lacks the RL1 gene encoding the virulence factor ICP34.5. This deletion nullifies the virus' ability to counteract host cell anti-viral responses and effectively restricts virus replication to cancer cells in which these mechanisms are absent or impaired. Seprehvir's safety has been demonstrated in multiple phase I clinical trials, including an ongoing trial for adolescents and young adults with refractory solid tumors initiated by our laboratory team (NCT00931931). We characterized the chemokine and cytokine profiles of human Ewing sarcoma and neuroblastoma cell lines before and after oHSV inoculation. We performed transwell migration assays of third-generation (containing CD28, OX40, and CD3z signaling domains) GD2-directed human CAR T-cells before and after the addition of Seprehvir in these models in vitro. We then performed in vivo survival studies using athymic nude mice and cyclophosphamide (CPM) lymphodepletion prior to CAR therapy. Our preliminary results suggest that infection of these pediatric solid tumor models with Seprehvir induces an immune response, which includes the T-cell attractant chemokines CXCL-10 (IP-10) and CCL-5 (RANTES) and T-cell activating cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α while down-regulating such inhibitory cytokines as TGF-β (
[0219]
[0220]
[0221] Experiment 1:
[0222] SK-N-AS In Vivo #1 Efficacy of Combination of oHSV1716+GD2 CAR T-cells in Pediatric Solid Tumor Xenograft Model SK-N-AS In Vivo (
[0223] SK-N-AS+/−oHSV+/−CAR-T study conclusions: [0224] There is no significant difference between oHSV+PBS and oHSV+Mock-T survival curves [0225] There is a significant survival advantage for oHSV+CAR-T compared to oHSV+PBS arm [0226] There is a very significant survival advantage for oHSV+CAR-T compared to PBS+CAR-T arm [0227] Lack of efficacy of PBS+CAR-T arm may be in part due to low GD2 expression of SK-N-AS [0228] Lack of significant efficacy of T-cell arms overall may be in part due to inherent mouse NK cells getting rid of T-cells
[0229] Experiment 2:
[0230] A673 In Vivo Lymphodepletion Pilot #1 Efficacy of Combination of oHSV1716+GD2 CAR T-cells with and without Lymphodepletion in Pediatric Solid Tumor Xenograft Model A673 In Vivo (
[0231] A673+/−Lymphodepletion+/−oHSV1716+GD2 CAR T-cells study conclusions: [0232] Lymphodepletion with CPPM in the absence of oHSV results in improvement of survival compared to no lymphodepletion or NK depletion with Asialo [0233] Lymphodepletion did not seem to have a significant effect on tumor growth or mouse survival when combined with oHSV [0234] All oHSV arms have superior survival benefit compared to PBS arms
Example 3—Oncolytic Virotherapy Enhances GD2-Directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy in GD2-Expressing Pediatric Solid Tumor Xenograft Models
[0235] High Risk Neuroblastoma (NBL) is the most common non-CNS pediatric solid tumor, requires multimodal and targeted therapy, is responsible for ˜15% total childhood cancer deaths and has <10% survival for ˜50% of children who relapse
[0236] Ewing Sarcoma (EWS) is among most prevalent solid tumor afflicting older children and adolescents, ˜30% are refractory to conventional therapy, there is ˜30% survival for patients with metastases.
[0237] GD2 is a disialoganglioside expressed on NBL and EWS, and is a strategic immunotherapeutic target.
[0238] Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cells are engineered T-cells targeted against tumor antigen, have remarkable efficacy in relapsed/refractory lymphoid leukemias. CAR T cells have so far shown little clinical success against solid tumors, modest migration to tumor, lack of activation, proliferation, and persistence. These limitations are attributable to the solid tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment.
[0239] Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virotherapy (oHSV) is tumor selective, subject of recent FDA approval with several open clinical trials. It combines two antitumor efficacy mechanisms: a direct lytic effect and induction of immune response.
[0240] While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have shown remarkable anticancer efficacy in patients with relapsed and refractory lymphoid leukemias, their effectiveness in patients with solid tumors has been more challenging. Among the barriers thought to interfere with CAR T cell efficacy are impaired homing to tumors and poor CAR T cell persistence, likely attributable to the immunosuppressive microenvironment. Due to their pro-inflammatory effects, oncolytic viruses are strong candidates to potentiate the competence of CAR T cells within solid tumors. Seprehvir (HSV1716) is an HSV-1 attenuated by deletion of the RL1 gene encoding the neurovirulence protein ICP34.5. The virus has a long track record of safety in clinical trials and is currently being tested in adolescents and young adults with refractory solid tumors (NCT00931931, NCT02031965). We hypothesized that intra-tumoral administration of Seprehvir enhances GD2-directed CAR T cell efficacy. We characterized the chemokine and cytokine profiles of human GD2-positive Ewing sarcoma and neuroblastoma cell lines before and after oHSV inoculation. We performed transwell migration assays of third-generation (containing CD28, OX40, and CD3z signaling domains) GD2-directed human CAR T-cells before and after the addition of Seprehvir in these models in vitro. We then performed in vivo survival studies using athymic nude mice and cyclophosphamide (CPM) lymphodepletion prior to CAR therapy. Our results suggest that infection of these pediatric solid tumor models with Seprehvir induces an immune response, which includes the T-cell attractant chemokines CXCL-10 (IP-10) and CCL-5 (RANTES) and T-cell activating cytokines such as IFN-g and TNF-α, while down-regulating such inhibitory cytokines as TGF-b. Flow cytometry analysis revealed variable tumoral GD2 surface expression on each of these models, while the CAR T-cells displayed high CXCR-3 and CCR-5 surface expression, allowing for chemotactic signaling through CXCL-10 and CCL-5, respectively. The CAR T-cells displayed increased migration toward oHSV-infected tumor cells over non-infected cells. Mice treated with combination therapy had significantly delayed tumor growth and prolonged survival when compared to CAR treatment alone. Despite being athymic nude mice, the majority of mice cured by combination therapy were resistant to tumor re-challenge, suggesting the long-term persistence of CAR T cells. These results indicate that the addition of Seprehvir may be a valuable adjunct to CAR T-cell therapy and should be further explored in clinical trials.
[0241] In vitro, we: [0242] Characterized oHSV-induced chemokine/cytokine gene expression by RT-PCR [0243] Tumor cells cultured with Seprehvir at multiplicity of infection (MOI)=10×12 hours [0244] Determined tumoral GD2 expression by flow cytometry [0245] Determined CAR T-cell CXCR-3 and CCR-5 expression by flow cytometry [0246] Performed transwell migration assays: [0247] Tumor cells cultured with Seprehvir at MOI=1×24 hours [0248] Red fluorescent PKH23-stained CAR T-cells added to 5 mm pore inserts×2 hours [0249] Negative control: media alone [0250] Positive controls: media with 75 ng/ml CXCL-10 (IP-10) or 10 ng/ml CCL-5 (RANTES) [0251] Cells quantified through microscopic visualization [0252] Results represent averages of n replicates for each sample
[0253] In vivo: [0254] Athymic nude mice with subcutaneous flank tumors [0255] PBS or Seprehvir was administered intra-tumorally (i.t)×3 (
[0258] Results are shown in
[0259] Our results showed that oHSV infection induces release of chemokines and cytokines that promote CAR T-cell migration and activation; oHSV enhances GD2-directed human CAR T-cell antitumor efficacy against GD2-expressing pediatric solid tumors. oHSV is a promising adjunct to CAR T-cell therapy for pediatric solid tumors.
REFERENCES
[0260] 1. Park, J. R., et al. Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: neuroblastoma. Pediatric blood & cancer. 6: 985-993. (2013). [0261] 2. Gorlick, R., et al. Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: bone tumors. Pediatric blood & cancer. 6: 1009-1015. (2013). [0262] 3. Lipinski, M., et al. Neuroectoderm-associated antigens on Ewing's sarcoma cell lines. Cancer research. 1: 183-187. (1987). [0263] 4. Yu, A. L., et al. Anti-GD2 antibody with GM-CSF, interleukin-2, and isotretinoin for neuroblastoma. The New England journal of medicine. 14: 1324-1334. (2010). [0264] 5. Maude, S. L., et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. The New England journal of medicine. 16: 1507-1517. (2014). [0265] 6. Singh, N., et al. Nature of tumor control by permanently and transiently modified GD2 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in xenograft models of neuroblastoma. Cancer immunology research. 11: 1059-1070. (2014). [0266] 7. Chen, D. S. & Mellman, I. Oncology meets immunology: the cancer-immunity cycle. Immunity. 1: 1-10. (2013). [0267] 8. Dolan, A., McKie, E., MacLean, A. R. & McGeoch, D. J. Status of the ICP34.5 gene in herpes simplex virus type 1 strain 17. The Journal of general virology. 971-973. (1992). [0268] 9. Workenhe, S. T., Verschoor, M. L. & Mossman, K. L. The role of oncolytic virus immunotherapies to subvert cancer immune evasion. Future oncology. 4: 675-689. (2015). [0269] 10. Nishio, N., et al. Armed oncolytic virus enhances immune functions of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in solid tumors. Cancer research. 18: 5195-5205. (2014). [0270] 11. NCT00931931. HSV1716 in Patients With Non-Central Nervous System (Non-CNS) Solid Tumors. 2009; January 9. [0271] 12. Cassady, K. A., et al., To Infection and Beyond: The Multi-Pronged Anti-Cancer Mechanisms of Oncolytic Viruses. Viruses, 2016. 8(2).