Ni-based alloy having excellent hot forgeability and corrosion resistance, and large structural member

Abstract

A Ni-based alloy having excellent hot forgeability and corrosion resistance includes, by mass %, Cr: more than 18% to less than 21%, Mo: more than 18% to less than 21%, Ta: 1.1% to 2.5%, Mg: 0.001% to 0.05%, N: 0.001% to 0.04%, Mn: 0.001% to 0.5%, Si: 0.001% to 0.05%, Fe: 0.01% to 1%, Co: 0.01% or more and less than 1%, Al: 0.01% to 0.5%, Ti: 0.01% or more and less than 0.1%, V: 0.005% or more and less than 0.1%, Nb: 0.001% or more and less than 0.1%, B: 0.0001% to 0.01%, Zr: 0.001% to 0.05%, and a balance consisting of Ni and unavoidable impurities.

Claims

1. A Ni-based alloy having improved hot forgeability and corrosion resistance comprising, by mass%: Cr: more than 18% to less than 21%; Mo: more than 18% to less than 21%; Ta: 1.1% to 2.5%; Mg: 0.001% to 0.05%; N: 0.001% to 0.04%; Mn: 0.001% to 0.5%; Si: 0.001% to 0.05%; Fe: 0.01% to 1%; Co: 0.01% or more and less than 1%; Al: 0.01% to 0.5%; Ti: 0.01% or more and less than 0.1%; V: 0.005% or more and less than 0.1%; Nb: 0.001% or more and less than 0.1%; B: 0.0001% to 0.01%; Zr: 0.001% to 0.05%; and a balance consisting of Ni and unavoidable impurities.

2. The Ni-based alloy having improved hot forgeability and corrosion resistance according to claim 1 further comprising, by mass %, one or more of Cu: 0.001% or more and less than 0.1%, and W: 0.001% or more and less than 0.1%.

3. The Ni-based alloy having improved hot forgeability and corrosion resistance according to claim 1 further comprising, by mass %, Ca: 0.001% or more and less than 0.05%.

4. The Ni-based alloy having improved hot forgeability and corrosion resistance according to any one of claims 1 further comprising, by mass %, Hf: 0.001% or more and less than 0.05%.

5. A large structural member formed by the Ni-based alloy having improved hot forgeability and corrosion resistance according to claim 1.

6. The Ni-based alloy having improved hot forgeability and corrosion resistance according to claim 1, wherein an amount of Mo is 18.5% to less than 21%.

7. The Ni-based alloy having improved hot forgeability and corrosion resistance according to claim 1, wherein the amount of Ta is 1.5% to 2.5%.

8. The Ni-based alloy having improved hot forgeability and corrosion resistance according to claim 1, wherein an amount of Mo is 18.5% to less than 21% and an amount of Ta is 1.5% to 2.5%.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a schematic view showing an external appearance of a hot torsion test apparatus in Examples.

(2) FIG. 2 is a view showing a size of a test piece for a hot torsion test in each Example.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

(3) Next, a composition range of each component element of a Ni-based alloy according to an embodiment of the present invention and reasons for limiting the range will be described.

(4) Cr and Mo:

(5) Cr and Mo have an effect of improving corrosion resistance against acid such as hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid. Particularly, in a petrochemical plant operated under a high-temperature environment, an acid having a relatively low concentration is used in many cases. The corrosion resistance against an acid having a relatively low concentration is exhibited by a Cr type passivation film containing Mo, and thus when Cr and Mo are combined and simultaneously contained, the effect of Cr and Mo is exhibited. In this case, it is necessary to contain more than 18 mass % of Cr (hereinafter, the “mass %” will be simply written as “%”). When the Cr content is 21% or more, in combination with Mo, the deformation resistance in a high-temperature region is rapidly increased and thus the hot forgeability is deteriorated. Therefore, the amount of Cr is set to more than 18% to less than 21%. The amount of Cr is preferably 18.5% to 20.5%. In the same manner, it is necessary to contain more than 18% of Mo. When the amount of Mo is 21% or more, in combination with Cr, the deformability in a high-temperature region is rapidly deteriorated and thus the hot forgeability is deteriorated. Therefore, the amount of Mo is set to more than 18% to less than 21%. The amount of Mo is preferably 18.5% to 20.5%.

(6) Ta:

(7) Ta has an effect of significantly strengthening and improving a passivation film by addition of a small amount of Ta. When the amount of Ta is 1.1% or more, an effect of significantly improving corrosion resistance against acid can be exhibited. When the amount of Ta is more than 2.5%, the deformability in a high-temperature region is rapidly deteriorated and thus the hot forgeability is deteriorated. Therefore, the amount of Ta is set to 1.1% to 2.5%. The amount of Ta is preferably 1.5% to 2.2%.

(8) N, Mn, and Mg:

(9) By coexistence of N, Mn, and Mg, the formation of a coarse μ phase (Ni.sub.7Mo.sub.6 type) which deteriorates hot forgeability at 1000° C. or lower can be suppressed. That is, N, Mn, and Mg stabilize a Ni-fcc phase which is a matrix and promotes the formation of a solid solution of Cr, Mo, and Ta. Thus, an effect of not easily precipitating the μ phase is obtained. Due to the effect, even in a temperature region lower than 1000° C., good hot forgeability can be maintained without causing a rapid increase in deformation resistance and a rapid deterioration in deformability.

(10) When the amount of N is less than 0.001%, an effect of suppressing the formation of the μ phase cannot be obtained. Accordingly, in this case, the μ phase is excessively formed in a hot forging step at 1000° C. or lower and as a result, the hot forgeability is deteriorated. On the other hand, when the amount of N is more than 0.04%, nitrides are formed and workability at a high temperature is deteriorated, and thus, it is difficult to work the alloy into a large structural member. Therefore, the amount of N is set to 0.001% to 0.04%. The amount of N is preferably 0.005% to 0.03%.

(11) In the same manner, when the amount of Mn is less than 0.001%, an effect of suppressing the formation of the μ phase cannot be obtained and accordingly, the hot forgeability at 1000° C. or lower is deteriorated. On the other hand, when the amount of Mn is more than 0.5%, the effect of suppressing the formation of the μ phase cannot be obtained and the corrosion resistance is deteriorated. Therefore, the amount of Mn is set to 0.001% to 0.5%. The amount of Mn is preferably 0.005% to 0.1%.

(12) Similarly, when the amount of Mg is 0.001% or less, an effect of suppressing the formation of the μ phase cannot be obtained and accordingly, the hot forgeability at 1000° C. or lower is deteriorated. On the other hand, when the amount of Mg is more than 0.05%, the effect of suppressing the formation of the μ phase cannot be obtained and the corrosion resistance is deteriorated. Therefore, the amount of Mg is set to 0.001% to 0.05%. The amount of Mg is preferably 0.005% to 0.04%.

(13) The effects of these three elements are not equivalent respectively and when the three elements are not simultaneously contained within a predetermined range, a sufficient effect cannot be obtained.

(14) Si:

(15) By adding Si as a deoxidizing agent, Si has an effect of reducing oxides and thereby improving the deformability at a high temperature relating to hot forgeability. The effect is exhibited by including 0.001% or more of Si. Including more than 0.05% of Si causes Si to be concentrated at boundaries, and thereby the deformability relating to the hot forgeability is rapidly deteriorated. Therefore, the amount of Si is set to 0.001% to 0.05%. The amount of Si is preferably 0.005% to 0.03%.

(16) Fe and Co:

(17) Fe and Co have an effect of preventing cracks by improving the toughness at a temperature of 1200° C. or higher. The effect is exhibited by including 0.01% or more of Fe. When the amount of Fe is more than 1%, the corrosion resistance is decreased. Therefore, the amount of Fe is set to 0.01% to 1%. The amount of Fe is preferably 0.1% to less than 1%.

(18) In the same manner, the above-described effect is exhibited by including 0.01% or more of Co. When the amount of Co is 1% or more, the deformation resistance at a high-temperature region is increased. Therefore, the amount of Co is set to 0.01% or more and less than 1%. The amount of Co is preferably 0.1% to less than 1%.

(19) Al and Ti:

(20) Al and Ti have an effect of improving the deformability at a high temperature relating to hot forgeability.

(21) The effect is exhibited by including 0.01% or more of Al. When the amount of Al is more than 0.5%, the deformation resistance is increased. Therefore, the amount of Al is set to 0.01% to 0.5%. The amount of Al is preferably 0.1% to 0.4%.

(22) In the same manner, the above-described effect is exhibited by including 0.01% or more of Ti. When the amount of Ti is 0.1% or more, the deformation resistance is increased. Therefore, the amount of Ti is set to 0.01% or more and less than 0.1%. The amount of Ti is preferably 0.03% to less than 0.09%.

(23) V and Nb:

(24) V and Nb have an effect of suppressing coarsening of grains in a high-temperature region. Due to the effect, the deformability relating to the hot forgeability particularly at 1200° C. or higher is remarkably improved. The effect is exhibited by including 0.005% or more of V. When the amount of V is 0.1% or more, the deformability is rather deteriorated. Therefore, the amount of V is set to 0.005% or more and less than 0.1%. The amount of V is preferably 0.01% to 0.09%.

(25) In the same manner, the above-described effect is exhibited by including 0.001% or more of Nb. When the amount of Nb is 0.1% or more, the corrosion resistance is deteriorated. Therefore, the amount of Nb is set to 0.001% or more and less than 0.1%. The amount of Nb is preferably 0.005% to 0.09%.

(26) Zr and B:

(27) Zr and B have an effect of improving the deformability in hot forgeability in a temperature region of 1200° C. or higher. The effect is exhibited by including 0.0001% or more of B. When the amount of B is more than 0.01%, the deformability is rather deteriorated. Therefore, the amount of B is set to 0.0001% to 0.01%. The amount of B is preferably 0.0005% to 0.005%.

(28) In the same manner, the above-described effect is exhibited by including 0.001% or more of Zr. When the amount of Zr is more than 0.05%, the deformability is rather deteriorated. Therefore, the amount of Zr is set to 0.001% to 0.05%. The amount of Zr is preferably 0.005% to 0.03%.

(29) Cu and W:

(30) Cu and W have an effect of improving the corrosion resistance in a corrosive environment using sulfuric acid and hydrochloric acid and thus are added as necessary. The effect is exhibited by including 0.001% or more of Cu. When the amount of Cu is 0.1% or more, the hot forgeability tends to be deteriorated. Therefore, the amount of Cu is set to 0.001% or more and less than 0.1%. The amount of Cu is preferably 0.005% to 0.09%.

(31) In the same manner, the above-described effect is exhibited by including 0.001% or more of W. When the amount of W is 0.1% or more, the hot forgeability tends to be deteriorated. Therefore, the amount of W is set to 0.001% or more and less than 0.1%. The amount of W is preferably 0.005% to 0.09%.

(32) Ca:

(33) Ca has an effect of improving the deformability in hot forgeability in a temperature region of 1200° C. or higher and thus is added as necessary. The effect is exhibited by including 0.001% or more of Ca. When the amount of Ca is 0.05% or more, the deformability is rather deteriorated. Therefore, the amount of Ca is set to 0.001% or more and less than 0.05%. The amount of Ca is preferably 0.005% to 0.01%.

(34) Hf:

(35) Hf has an effect of decreasing the deformation resistance in hot forgeability at a temperature region of 1200° C. or higher and thus is added as necessary. The effect is exhibited by including 0.001% or more of Hf. When the amount of Hf is 0.05% or more, the deformability tends to be deteriorated. Therefore, the amount of Hf is set to 0.001% or more and less than 0.05%. The amount of Hf is preferably 0.002% to 0.01%.

(36) Unavoidable Impurities:

(37) P, S, Sn, Zn, Pb, and C are unavoidably contained as melting raw materials. When the amounts are P: less than 0.01%, S: less than 0.01%, Sn: less than 0.01%, Zn: less than 0.01%, Pb: less than 0.002%, and C: less than 0.01%, it is allowable to contain the above-described component elements within the above-described ranges because alloy properties are not deteriorated.

(38) Hereinafter, examples of the present invention will be described.

EXAMPLES

(39) Using a typical high-frequency melting furnace, a Ni-based alloy having a predetermined component composition was melted and about 3 kg of a rod-like ingot having a size of 30 mm×30 mm×400 mm was formed. The ingot was subjected to homogenizing heat treatment at 1230° C. for 10 hours and then water-quenched. Thus, Ni-based alloys 1 to 46 of the present invention shown in Tables 1 and 3, comparative Ni-based alloys 1 to 30 shown in Tables 5 and 7, and conventional Ni-based alloys 1 to 3 shown in Table 9 were prepared.

(40) The conventional Ni-based alloys 1 and 2 shown in Table 9 correspond to the alloy disclosed in PTL 1 (Japanese Patent No. 2910565) and the conventional Ni-based alloy 3 corresponds to the alloy disclosed in PTL 2 (Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. H7-316697).

(41) In Tables 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9, the “balance” in the column of “Ni” includes unavoidable impurities. In addition, in Tables 5 and 7, an asterisk is attached to a composition out of the range of the embodiment of the present invention.

(42) From each of these rod-like ingots, a test piece 5 shown in FIG. 2 was prepared by machining and subjected to a hot torsion test and the maximum shear stress when the test piece was fractured and the number of torsions until the test piece was fractured were measured.

(43) As shown in the external appearance of a hot torsion test apparatus in FIG. 1, the hot torsion test apparatus includes a motor 1, a gear box 2, a clutch 3, an electric furnace 4, a load cell 6, and a clutch lever 7 arranged on the same shaft. In addition, on both sides of the gear box 2, shaft protection covers 8 and 9 are provided. As the test piece 5, a smooth round bar type shown in FIG. 2 was used. Specifically, the test piece 5 includes a cylindrical parallel portion 5A, stopper portions 5B and 5B on both sides of the parallel portion 5A, and screw portions 5C and 5C on both sides of the stopper portion 5B. The test piece 5 is fixed to the hot torsion test apparatus by screwing the screw portions 5C and 5C with a test piece-fixing portion of a hot torsion test apparatus (not shown). At this time, the stopper portions 5B and 5B prevent gaps between the screw portions 5C and 5C and the test piece-fixing portion from generating during the hot torsion test. In the hot torsion test, the parallel portion 5A having a smaller diameter than the other portions is twisted. The test piece 5 was formed so that the parallel portion 5A had a diameter of 8 mm±0.05 mm and a length of 30 mm±0.05 mm, the stopper portions 5B had a maximum diameter of 28 mm and a width of 5 mm, the screw portions 5C had M20 threads, and the total length of the test piece 5 was 70 mm. In addition, non-screw portions of 3 mm were respectively provided between the screw portions 5C and the stopper portions 5B and also the surface of the parallel portion 5A was ground-finished.

(44) The test piece 5 was mounted in the electric furnace 4 coaxially as the motor 1, the temperature inside the electric furnace 4 was increased to 1250° C., which was a test temperature, and then the rotation of the motor 1 was driven. After the rotation of the motor 1 was stabilized, the clutch 3 was connected so that the rotation of the motor 1 was transmitted to the test piece 5. A rotated end of the test piece 5 (right end in FIG. 1) was twisted at a torsion rate of 100 rpm by the rotation of the motor 1 to perform a both-ends restrain torsion test. At this time, a rotation load applied to a fixed end of the test piece 5 (left end in FIG. 1) was measured at the load cell 6. The maximum value of the measured rotation load was divided by a cross-sectional area of the parallel portion 5A of the test piece 5 to calculate a value of the maximum shear stress. Further, the number of rotations of the rotated end of the test piece 5 relative to the fixed end (a number proportional to the number of rotations of the motor 1) until the parallel portion 5A of the test piece 5 was fractured was measured as the number of torsions.

(45) The maximum shear stress (MPa) (deformation resistance) and the number of torsions (times) (deformability) obtained as the results of the test are shown in Tables 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.

(46) Next, the corrosion resistance was evaluated by conducting a corrosion test using sulfuric acid and hydrochloric acid having a relatively low concentration.

(47) Each of materials having a size of 30 mm×30 mm×100 mm was cut from each of square bars (rod-like ingots) having compositions in Tables 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9. While materials were maintained within a range of 900° C. to 1250° C., each of plates having a thickness of 5 mm was produced by hot forging submitted to each of materials (deformed from 30 mm to 5 mm by a single press operation).

(48) Each of the plates having a thickness of 5 mm was maintained at 1180° C. for 30 minutes, water-quenched, and then cut into a plate piece having a size of 25 mm×25 mm×thickness 3 mm. Then, each surface of the plate pieces was polished and lastly finish-polished by waterproof 400 grit emery paper to prepare each corrosion test piece.

(49) The finish-polished test pieces were kept in an ultrasonic vibration state in acetone for 5 minutes thereby degreasing the test pieces.

(50) Each of the Ni-based alloys 1 to 46 of the present invention, comparative Ni-based alloys 1 to 20, and conventional alloys 1 to 3 was subjected to an immersion tests in a solution of 1% hydrochloric acid (1% HCl) and a solution of 10% sulfuric acid (10% H.sub.2SO.sub.4), which were maintained at a boiling temperature thereof, for 24 hours. A corrosion rate was calculated based on weight loss before and after the immersion test. Specifically, the corrosion rate was calculated by the following equation.
Corrosion rate(mm/year)=ΔW/(S.Math.t)×8.761/ρ

(51) ΔW: reduction amount of weight (g) before and after test

(52) S: surface area of test piece (m.sup.2)

(53) t: Test time (h)

(54) ρ: Specific gravity (g/cm.sup.3)

(55) The calculation results are shown in Tables 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.

(56) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 (unit: mass %) Type Cr Mo Ta Mg N Mn Si Fe Co Al Ti V Nb B Zr Cu W Ca Hf Ni 1 18.8 19.1 1.8 0.010 0.012 0.010 0.011 0.15 0.45 0.31 0.08 0.011 0.013 0.0010 0.010 — — — — Balance 2 18.1 20.5 1.5 0.022 0.005 0.034 0.028 0.10 0.25 0.12 0.05 0.023 0.006 0.0007 0.005 — — — — Balance 3 20.9 18.5 2.0 0.005 0.018 0.006 0.008 0.23 0.40 0.16 0.04 0.018 0.039 0.0014 0.012 — — — — Balance 4 19.5 18.1 2.2 0.038 0.027 0.045 0.016 0.27 0.39 0.39 0.07 0.045 0.045 0.0023 0.014 — — — — Balance 5 18.5 20.9 1.6 0.012 0.016 0.078 0.022 0.12 0.31 0.14 0.04 0.089 0.019 0.0048 0.016 — — — — Balance 6 19.6 20.5 1.1 0.008 0.008 0.027 0.021 0.15 0.55 0.20 0.06 0.076 0.025 0.0033 0.021 — — — — Balance 7 18.8 18.7 2.5 0.009 0.017 0.088 0.018 0.33 0.65 0.25 0.05 0.045 0.068 0.0019 0.026 — — — — Balance 8 19.4 19.1 1.7 0.001 0.013 0.067 0.014 0.39 0.14 0.19 0.04 0.033 0.087 0.0012 0.020 — — — — Balance 9 18.9 19.7 1.8 0.049 0.019 0.098 0.010 0.64 0.38 0.33 0.08 0.041 0.065 0.0045 0.019 — — — — Balance 10 20.1 18.5 2.0 0.031 0.002 0.076 0.012 0.22 0.75 0.30 0.04 0.019 0.019 0.0031 0.007 — — — — Balance 11 19.8 19.2 1.6 0.014 0.039 0.025 0.019 0.78 0.88 0.21 0.05 0.088 0.021 0.0024 0.011 — — — — Balance 12 19.3 19.4 1.7 0.011 0.023 0.001 0.012 0.45 0.73 0.21 0.03 0.067 0.027 0.0036 0.016 — — — — Balance 13 20.4 18.5 1.9 0.019 0.018 0.497 0.024 0.26 0.12 0.19 0.04 0.055 0.056 0.0058 0.014 — — — — Balance 14 19.8 18.6 2.1 0.020 0.022 0.057 0.002 0.31 0.16 0.11 0.05 0.041 0.048 0.0032 0.027 — — — — Balance 15 19.5 18.7 1.9 0.016 0.015 0.073 0.049 0.40 0.10 0.16 0.06 0.033 0.076 0.0026 0.019 — — — — Balance 16 19.1 19.7 1.6 0.014 0.011 0.094 0.017 0.01 0.22 0.24 0.06 0.037 0.034 0.0035 0.023 — — — — Balance 17 18.9 20.1 1.7 0.009 0.013 0.023 0.022 0.98 0.28 0.29 0.05 0.021 0.021 0.0041 0.017 — — — — Balance 18 19.0 19.5 1.5 0.029 0.018 0.032 0.029 0.36 0.02 0.33 0.04 0.018 0.016 0.0022 0.012 — — — — Balance 19 19.2 19.4 2.0 0.013 0.021 0.030 0.011 0.20 0.98 0.14 0.05 0.015 0.018 0.0030 0.018 — — — — Balance 20 18.7 19.3 2.1 0.014 0.014 0.065 0.017 0.29 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.014 0.043 0.0027 0.009 — — — — Balance 21 20.0 18.6 2.3 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.023 0.14 0.56 0.49 0.07 0.033 0.039 0.0017 0.010 — — — — Balance 22 19.7 18.8 1.9 0.015 0.009 0.044 0.027 0.66 0.31 0.22 0.01 0.049 0.048 0.0010 0.011 — — — — Balance 23 19.5 19.0 1.8 0.023 0.013 0.059 0.018 0.31 0.61 0.19 0.09 0.038 0.021 0.007 0.006 — — — — Balance

(57) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Hot torsion test Corrosion test Maximum shear stress Number of torsions Boiling 1% HCl Boiling 10% H.sub.2SO.sub.4 State after forging Type (MPa) (times) (mm/year) (mm/year) in test piece-producing step 1 80 9.2 0.008 0.036 No cracks 2 80 8.2 0.005 0.030 No cracks 3 87 8.4 0.006 0.032 No cracks 4 82 8.6 0.004 0.022 No cracks 5 78 6.1 0.010 0.041 No cracks 6 82 7.2 0.004 0.013 No cracks 7 78 6.4 0.010 0.040 No cracks 8 80 8.0 0.004 0.028 No cracks 9 79 8.5 0.006 0.032 No cracks 10 78 8.1 0.009 0.041 No cracks 11 79 7.8 0.009 0.038 No cracks 12 79 9.0 0.007 0.024 No cracks 13 80 8.4 0.004 0.028 No cracks 14 78 7.9 0.008 0.036 No cracks 15 79 6.2 0.008 0.037 No cracks 16 81 7.6 0.004 0.028 No cracks 17 77 9.1 0.010 0.040 No cracks 18 81 8.8 0.006 0.024 No cracks 19 81 7.4 0.004 0.023 No cracks 20 81 8.1 0.005 0.029 No cracks 21 79 7.9 0.007 0.034 No cracks 22 79 8.4 0.008 0.037 No cracks 23 80 8.5 0.009 0.041 No cracks

(58) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Type Cr Mo Ta Mg N Mn Si Fe Co Al Ti V Nb 24 19.2 19.2 1.8 0.016 0.008 0.064 0.011 0.18 0.21 0.12 0.03 0.005 0.016 25 18.9 19.6 1.5 0.011 0.013 0.077 0.007 0.12 0.37 0.25 0.06 0.097 0.023 26 19.4 19.0 2.0 0.008 0.017 0.083 0.027 0.22 0.31 0.34 0.05 0.081 0.001 27 19.3 19.1 1.8 0.013 0.011 0.043 0.030 0.25 0.43 0.15 0.05 0.051 0.098 28 19.2 19.3 2.1 0.022 0.010 0.079 0.028 0.31 0.48 0.28 0.04 0.055 0.054 29 18.7 19.7 1.9 0.026 0.019 0.038 0.022 0.20 0.36 0.31 0.05 0.023 0.074 30 19.0 19.5 1.8 0.014 0.022 0.081 0.025 0.12 0.56 0.38 0.07 0.037 0.013 31 19.8 18.7 1.7 0.016 0.025 0.043 0.018 0.59 0.62 0.27 0.06 0.031 0.054 32 19.6 18.9 2.2 0.007 0.019 0.059 0.013 0.51 0.46 0.12 0.05 0.018 0.040 33 19.8 18.6 1.8 0.009 0.023 0.065 0.015 0.46 0.21 0.16 0.06 0.015 0.021 34 19.2 19.4 1.6 0.013 0.014 0.011 0.021 0.33 0.36 0.18 0.07 0.011 0.011 35 19.4 18.9 1.7 0.019 0.018 0.021 0.023 0.28 0.31 0.22 0.05 0.020 0.017 36 19.3 19.0 1.9 0.020 0.015 0.031 0.016 0.19 0.27 0.31 0.08 0.026 0.024 37 19.1 19.4 1.7 0.013 0.013 0.048 0.005 0.39 0.48 0.39 0.06 0.036 0.033 38 19.2 19.7 1.6 0.018 0.011 0.036 0.013 0.35 0.55 0.24 0.03 0.038 0.038 39 18.9 19.6 1.7 0.017 0.012 0.027 0.017 0.27 0.51 0.13 0.04 0.046 0.041 40 18.8 19.9 1.9 0.011 0.015 0.056 0.022 0.62 0.43 0.18 0.04 0.044 0.036 41 19.0 19.7 1.8 0.014 0.016 0.044 0.020 0.36 0.38 0.14 0.05 0.057 0.022 42 19.4 19.1 1.6 0.016 0.021 0.030 0.025 0.51 0.31 0.27 0.03 0.039 0.028 43 18.6 20.0 1.6 0.009 0.027 0.061 0.018 0.49 0.48 0.21 0.05 0.014 0.025 44 18.7 19.7 1.7 0.010 0.020 0.134 0.014 0.45 0.41 0.38 0.06 0.017 0.034 45 18.9 19.9 1.5 0.011 0.007 0.036 0.017 0.27 0.37 0.30 0.07 0.041 0.048 46 19.2 19.4 1.6 0.014 0.014 0.087 0.011 0.35 0.22 0.23 0.04 0.060 0.067 (unit mass %) Type B Zr Cu W Ca Hf Ni 24 0.0022 0.007 — — — — Balance 25 0.0017 0.011 — — — — Balance 26 0.0039 0.014 — — — — Balance 27 0.0044 0.016 — — — — Balance 28 0.0002 0.014 — — — — Balance 29 0.0095 0.012 — — — — Balance 30 0.0016 0.001 — — — — Balance 31 0.0023 0.048 — — — — Balance 32 0.0038 0.012 0.001 — — — Balance 33 0.0012 0.017 0.098 — — — Balance 34 0.0044 0.016 — 0.001 — — Balance 35 0.0021 0.013 — 0.098 — — Balance 36 0.0013 0.012 0.012 0.022 — — Balance 37 0.0030 0.015 — — 0.001 — Balance 38 0.0028 0.023 — — 0.048 — Balance 39 0.0025 0.026 0.027 0.017 0.007 — Balance 40 0.0014 0.022 — — — 0.001 Balance 41 0.0008 0.024 — — — 0.048 Balance 42 0.0020 0.012 0.034 — — 0.008 Balance 43 0.0027 0.010 — 0.025 — 0.010 Balance 44 0.0032 0.008 0.014 0.019 0.009 0.006 Balance 45 0.0027 0.021 0.044 — 0.009 — Balance 46 0.0041 0.017 — 0.038 0.007 — Balance

(59) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Hot torsion test Corrosion test Maximum shear stress Number of torsions Boiling 1% HCl Boiling 10% H.sub.2SO.sub.4 State after forging Type (MPa) (times) (mm/year) (mm/year) in test piece-producing step 24 79 8.8 0.008 0.036 No cracks 25 78 6.2 0.010 0.044 No cracks 26 80 8.7 0.004 0.028 No cracks 27 79 6.1 0.008 0.037 No cracks 28 81 8.9 0.005 0.020 No cracks 29 81 6.2 0.004 0.026 No cracks 30 80 9.3 0.006 0.031 No cracks 31 77 6.4 0.010 0.044 No cracks 32 81 9.6 0.004 0.020 No cracks 33 78 6.1 0.009 0.041 No cracks 34 78 9.1 0.010 0.042 No cracks 35 77 6.3 0.010 0.044 No cracks 36 79 8.6 0.007 0.034 No cracks 37 79 9.2 0.009 0.038 No cracks 38 76 9.4 0.009 0.038 No cracks 39 78 8.4 0.008 0.036 No cracks 40 73 8.1 0.005 0.022 No cracks 41 68 6.1 0.005 0.029 No cracks 42 72 7.6 0.013 0.045 No cracks 43 71 8.3 0.007 0.035 No cracks 44 72 9.4 0.006 0.033 No cracks 45 76 8.4 0.009 0.041 No cracks 46 77 8.8 0.009 0.041 No cracks

(60) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Type Cr Mo Ta Mg N Mn Si Fe Co Al 1 17.9* 19.3 2.1 0.006 0.016 0.053 0.010 0.24 0.12 0.35 2 21.1* 19.1 1.5 0.010 0.014 0.033 0.014 0.29 0.78 0.28 3 19.4 17.9* 1.7 0.013 0.018 0.039 0.026 0.35 0.55 0.14 4 19.0 21.1* 1.6 0.016 0.012 0.027 0.021 0.16 0.34 0.39 5 18.9 19.6 1.0* 0.014 0.009 0.035 0.017 0.14 0.25 0.21 6 18.7 19.8 2.6* 0.009 0.017 0.033 0.011 0.23 0.17 0.16 7 19.2 19.2 1.7 —* 0.013 0.041 0.018 0.35 0.39 0.11 8 19.0 19.3 2.2 0.053* 0.011 0.028 0.026 0.31 0.76 0.18 9 19.5 18.8 1.6 0.032 —* 0.033 0.021 0.22 0.50 0.26 10 19.9 20.3 2.0 0.038 0.044* 0.041 0.015 0.17 0.19 0.20 11 20.1 18.6 1.9 0.029 0.016 —* 0.028 0.41 0.38 0.18 12 19.4 19.1 1.5 0.024 0.018 0.505* 0.017 0.49 0.46 0.16 13 19.3 18.9 1.7 0.021 0.014 0.061 —* 0.34 0.55 0.19 14 19.7 18.7 1.8 0.031 0.019 0.065 0.052* 0.27 0.61 0.28 15 18.9 19.2 1.9 0.033 0.023 0.072 0.023 —* 0.45 0.23 16 18.7 19.3 2.0 0.016 0.016 0.039 0.017 1.05* 0.22 0.36 17 19.1 19.4 1.6 0.017 0.010 0.025 0.011 0.58 —* 0.26 18 19.3 18.9 1.7 0.014 0.012 0.037 0.024 0.32 1.04* 0.30 19 19.6 19.1 1.8 0.011 0.009 0.040 0.018 0.24 0.30 —* 20 19.7 19.0 1.9 0.019 0.015 0.089 0.012 0.18 0.27 0.52* (unit: mass %) Type Ti V Nb B Zr Cu W Ca Hf Ni 1 0.03 0.033 0.041 0.0024 0.011 — — — — Balance 2 0.06 0.045 0.015 0.0015 0.013 — — — — Balance 3 0.05 0.065 0.011 0.0044 0.018 — — — — Balance 4 0.04 0.041 0.034 0.0021 0.021 — — — — Balance 5 0.05 0.036 0.021 0.0018 0.024 — — — — Balance 6 0.07 0.055 0.029 0.0028 0.030 — — — — Balance 7 0.08 0.048 0.038 0.0033 0.015 — — — — Balance 8 0.05 0.037 0.045 0.0038 0.011 — — — — Balance 9 0.04 0.022 0.047 0.0041 0.013 — — — — Balance 10 0.06 0.029 0.051 0.0018 0.011 — — — — Balance 11 0.05 0.018 0.043 0.0026 0.023 — — — — Balance 12 0.03 0.023 0.039 0.0019 0.021 — — — — Balance 13 0.04 0.047 0.026 0.0026 0.028 — — — — Balance 14 0.04 0.040 0.024 0.0011 0.016 — — — — Balance 15 0.05 0.059 0.036 0.0014 0.011 — — — — Balance 16 0.04 0.071 0.029 0.0034 0.015 — — — — Balance 17 0.06 0.064 0.022 0.0033 0.014 — — — — Balance 18 0.03 0.034 0.027 0.0037 0.019 — — — — Balance 19 0.07 0.058 0.023 0.0045 0.022 — — — — Balance 20 0.09 0.078 0.017 0.0018 0.028 — — — — Balance *indicates that the element deviates from the composition of the present invention.

(61) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Hot torsion test Corrosion test Maximum shear stress Number of torsions Boiling 1% HCl Boiling 10% H.sub.2SO.sub.4 State after forging Type (MPa) (times) (mm/year) (mm/year) in test piece-producing step 1 80 7.6 0.022 0.051 No cracks 2 96 6.1 0.011 0.042 No cracks 3 74 7.9 0.024 0.059 No cracks 4 83 4.8 0.004 0.028 Edge cracks 5 74 7.6 0.028 0.068 No cracks 6 86 4.5 0.007 0.038 Edge cracks 7 78 7.7 0.010 0.040 Edge cracks 8 82 5.2 0.026 0.058 No cracks 9 77 6.6 0.015 0.050 Edge cracks 10 84 5.8 0.007 0.036 Edge cracks 11 79 5.9 0.008 0.036 Edge cracks 12 77 6.8 0.009 0.038 Edge cracks 13 77 4.4 0.012 0.044 No cracks 14 78 4.7 0.010 0.039 No cracks 15 79 5.3 0.006 0.032 Edge cracks 16 80 7.2 0.020 0.057 No cracks 17 78 5.7 0.010 0.043 Edge cracks 18 98 5.8 0.010 0.044 No cracks 19 83 4.1 0.008 0.035 Edge cracks 20 99 6.4 0.005 0.031 No cracks

(62) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Type Cr Mo Ta Mg N Mn Si Fe Co Al Ti 21 19.1 19.6 1.7 0.022 0.016 0.014 0.017 0.11 0.23 0.29 —* 22 18.8 19.8 2.0 0.025 0.018 0.015 0.015 0.23 0.45 0.33 0.11* 23 19.6 19.2 1.6 0.019 0.014 0.023 0.019 0.21 0.62 0.21 0.04 24 19.7 19.2 1.5 0.017 0.016 0.065 0.025 0.13 0.41 0.17 0.03 25 19.5 19.0 1.9 0.014 0.016 0.038 0.029 0.20 0.27 0.15 0.05 26 18.9 19.5 1.7 0.015 0.017 0.074 0.022 0.22 0.19 0.20 0.06 27 19.8 18.7 1.8 0.020 0.015 0.046 0.026 0.12 0.65 0.27 0.04 28 19.5 18.9 1.9 0.009 0.011 0.034 0.014 0.38 0.31 0.31 0.08 29 19.6 18.8 1.6 0.007 0.010 0.041 0.009 0.29 0.33 0.37 0.06 30 19.7 19.3 1.5 0.018 0.009 0.015 0.006 0.21 0.47 0.17 0.07 (unit mass %) Type V Nb B Zr Cu W Ca Hf Ni 21 0.066 0.034 0.0022 0.020 — — — — Balance 22 0.060 0.041 0.0026 0.012 — — — — Balance 23 —* 0.040 0.0039 0.010 — — — — Balance 24 0.110* 0.033 0.0022 0.014 — — — — Balance 25 0.054 —* 0.0018 0.016 — — — — Balance 26 0.051 0.105* 0.0015 0.011 — — — — Balance 27 0.063 0.065 —* 0.008 — — — — Balance 28 0.069 0.055 0.0106* 0.019 — — — — Balance 29 0.071 0.058 0.0035 —* — — — — Balance 30 0.083 0.023 0.0044 0.052* — — — — Balance *indicates that the element deviates from the composition of the present invention.

(63) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Hot torsion test Corrosion test Maximum shear stress Number of torsions Boiling 1% HCl Boiling 10% H.sub.2SO.sub.4 State after forging Type (MPa) (times) (mm/year) (mm/year) in test piece-producing step 21 79 4.3 0.008 0.035 Edge cracks 22 102 6.7 0.006 0.030 No cracks 23 78 3.8 0.012 0.043 Edge cracks 24 77 3.4 0.013 0.046 Edge cracks 25 79 3.6 0.006 0.033 Edge cracks 26 79 3.2 0.008 0.036 Edge cracks 27 78 3.4 0.010 0.040 Edge cracks 28 79 4.6 0.007 0.035 Edge cracks 29 77 3.2 0.009 0.049 Edge cracks 30 78 4.1 0.010 0.046 Edge cracks

(64) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Type Cr Mo Ta Mg N Mn Si Fe Co Al 1 20.4 19.1 1.88 0.0119 — 0.2346 0.0354 0.12 — — 2 19.2 21.1 1.93 0.0216 — 0.2235 0.0734 3.62 — — 3 20.1 19.7 1.72 — 0.0006 0.0729 0.0214 0.05 — — (unit: mass %) Type Ti V Nb B Zr Cu W Ca Hf Ni 1 — — — — — — — — 0.014 Balance 2 — — 0.12 0.004 0.001 0.13 0.15 — 0.004 Balance 3 — — — 0.003 — — — — 0.0058 Balance

(65) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Hot torsion test Corrosion test Maximum shear stress Number of torsions Boiling 1% HCl Boiling 10% H.sub.2SO.sub.4 State after forging Type (MPa) (times) (mm/year) (mm/year) in test piece-producing step 1 88 1.5 0.012 0.044 Edge cracks 2 93 3.4 0.014 0.043 Edge cracks 3 91 3.2 0.012 0.043 Edge cracks

(66) From the results shown in Tables 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10, it was possible to confirm that, compared to the conventional Ni-based alloys 1 to 3 as conventional materials, the corrosion resistance and the deformation resistance at 1250° C. (maximum shear stress) of the Ni-based alloys 1 to 46 of the present invention were at the same level. In addition, it was possible to confirm that, compared to the conventional Ni-based alloys 1 to 3 as conventional materials, the deformability (the number of torsions) at 1250° C. of the Ni-based alloys 1 to 46 of the present invention was particularly significantly improved.

(67) Further, regarding the comparative Ni-based alloys 1 to 30 deviating from the present invention, any of the results that the corrosion resistance was deteriorated, the deformability at 1250° C. (the number of torsions) was small, and the hot forgeability was deteriorated such that cracking occurred in a forging step at 1000° C. or lower for producing the corrosion test piece, compared to the Ni-based alloys 1 to 46 of the present invention, was obtained.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

(68) As described above, according to the Ni-based alloy of the present invention, since the hot forgeability can be improved without deteriorating the corrosion resistance, a large structural member can be produced. Since a weld zone can be reduced as much as possible as increasing the size, a portion having deteriorated corrosion resistance can be minimized. Therefore, it is possible to improve the corrosion resistance of the equipment as a whole used in a petrochemical plant, a pharmaceutical intermediate-manufacturing plant, and a pollution control system. In addition, it is possible to reduce the frequency of maintenance. In this manner, the Ni-based alloy of the present invention exhibits excellent industrial effects.

(69) Further, since the Ni-based alloy of the present invention has excellent hot forgeability, a long seamless tube having a large diameter can be easily produced using the Ni-based alloy. Therefore, the Ni-based alloy of the present invention is expected as a new material to be applied to new fields.