Interferometric measurement device comprising a filtering interferometer

Abstract

An interferometric measurement device includes a broad-spectrum spontaneous emission light source; a measurement interferometer, receiving a light signal with input light power and delivering a modulated light signal with output light power, the modulated light signal being modulated at a modulation frequency, depending on a physical parameter to be measured and being proportional to the input light power; an optical radiation detector, receiving the modulated light signal exiting from the measurement interferometer and delivering a modulated electrical signal representative of the output light power; a filtering interferometer, insensitive to the physical parameter to be measured, having a free spectral range ISL and a finesse F selected such that an interval of frequencies, centerd around an optimal frequency f.sub.optim equal to (2k+1)ISL/2, k being a natural number, and of width Δf equal to [0.9−(3/2F)]ISL, includes the modulation frequency of the modulated light.

Claims

1. An interferometric measurement device including: a broad-spectrum spontaneous emission light source, a measurement interferometer comprising a modulator, and receiving, as an input, a light signal of input light power P.sub.in and delivering, as an output, a modulated light signal of output light power P.sub.out, said modulated light signal being modulated by said modulator at a modulation frequency f.sub.m, said modulated light signal depending on a physical parameter to be measured and being proportional to said input light power P.sub.in, and an optical radiation detector, receiving the modulated light signal exiting from said measurement interferometer and delivering a modulated electrical signal (3A) proportional to said output light power P.sub.out, said interferometric measurement device including a filtering interferometer insensitive to said physical parameter to be measured placed between said light source and said measurement interferometer or between said measurement interferometer and said optical radiation detector, said filtering interferometer having a filtering interferometer input and a filtering interferometer output, said filtering interferometer being: i) a two-wave interferometer configured so that exactly two split light signals, propagated over two respective arms of the filtering interferometer, are being superimposed and interfering with each other to form a filtered light signal transmitted on the output of the filtering interferometer, the filtering interferometer having a free spectral range ISL, expressed in frequency, equal to an inverse of a difference between two respective propagation times of said interfering light signals over said two arms, or ii) a multiple-wave resonant interferometer comprising a resonator, wherein more than two light signals propagated through said resonator are being superimposed and interfering with each other to form a filtered light signal transmitted on the output of the filtering interferometer, the filtering interferometer having a free spectral range ISL, expressed in frequency, equal to an inverse of a propagation time of said interfering light signals over a resonator passage, said filtering interferometer having a finesse F, and a filtering interferometer response equal to a ratio between a light power outputted by the filtering interferometer and a source light power at the filtering interferometer input, said response presenting, as a function of an optical frequency of a transmitted light, peaks and troughs, said peaks being periodically separated in frequency by the filtering interferometer free spectral range ISL, each of said troughs being located, in frequency, between two said successive peaks, said peaks presenting a full width at half maximum equal to the filtering interferometer free spectral range ISL divided by its finesse F, wherein said filtering interferometer has: i) in a case the filtering interferometer is a two-wave interferometer, a length-difference between said arms, or ii) in a case the filtering interferometer is a multiple-wave resonant interferometer, a resonator one-passage length, such that the free spectral range ISL of the filtering interferometer defines a frequency interval centred about an optimum frequency f.sub.optim equal to (2k+1) ISL/2, k being a natural number, and of width Δf equal to [0.9−(3/2F)] ISL, that comprises the modulation frequency f.sub.m of the modulated light signal at the output of the measurement interferometer.

2. The interferometric measurement device according to claim 1, wherein said filtering interferometer is configured in dual-passage mode.

3. The interferometric measurement device according to claim 2, wherein said filtering interferometer comprises a fiber-optic interferometer.

4. The interferometric measurement device according to claim 2, wherein said measurement interferometer comprises a fiber-optic SAGNAC ring interferometer.

5. The interferometric measurement device according to claim 1, wherein said filtering interferometer comprises a fiber-optic interferometer.

6. The interferometric measurement device according to claim 5, wherein said fiber-optic filtering interferometer comprises a polarization-maintaining optical fiber.

7. The interferometric measurement device according to claim 5, wherein said measurement interferometer comprises a fiber-optic SAGNAC ring interferometer, and a length of the optical fiber of the filtering interferometer is slightly higher than a length of the optical fiber of the SAGNAC ring interferometer.

8. The interferometric measurement device according to claim 1, said filtering interferometer being said multiple-wave resonant interferometer, wherein the resonator of the filtering interferometer comprises a ring resonator and two optical couplers whose ratios T/C of transmission coefficient T to coupling coefficient C are comprised between 70/30 and 95/5.

9. The interferometric measurement device according to claim 8, wherein the ring resonator has a null surface.

10. The interferometric measurement device according to claim 1, wherein, when said filtering interferometer is placed between said light source and said measurement interferometer, said interferometric measurement device includes a doped-fiber optical amplifier placed between said filtering interferometer and said measurement interferometer.

11. The interferometric measurement device according to claim 1, wherein said measurement interferometer comprises a fiber-optic SAGNAC ring interferometer.

12. A fiber optic gyrometer including the interferometric measurement device according to claim 11.

13. A fiber optic gyrometer including the interferometric measurement device according to claim 1.

14. The interferometric measurement device according to claim 1, wherein, said filtering interferometer is said two-wave interferometer configured so that the exactly two split light signals, propagated over the two respective arms of the filtering interferometer, are being superimposed and interfering with each other to form the filtered light signal transmitted on the output of the filtering interferometer, the filtering interferometer having the free spectral range ISL, expressed in frequency, equal to the inverse of the difference between two respective propagation times of said interfering light signals over said two arms, and the length-difference between said arms such that the free spectral range ISL of the filtering interferometer defines the frequency interval centred about the optimum frequency f.sub.optim equal to (2k+1) ISL/2, and of the width Δf equal to [0.9−(3/2F)] ISL, that comprises the modulation frequency f.sub.m of the modulated light signal at the output of the measurement interferometer.

15. The interferometric measurement device according to claim 1, wherein, said filtering interferometer is said multiple-wave resonant interferometer comprising a resonator, wherein the more than two light signals propagated through said resonator are being superimposed and interfering with each other to form the filtered light signal transmitted on the output of the filtering interferometer, the filtering interferometer having the free spectral range ISL, expressed in frequency, equal to the inverse of the propagation time of said interfering light signals over the resonator passage, and the resonator one-passage length such that the free spectral range ISL of the filtering interferometer defines the frequency interval centred about the optimum frequency f.sub.optim equal to (2k+1) ISL/2, and of the width Δf equal to [0.9−(3/2F)] ISL, that comprises the modulation frequency f.sub.m of the modulated light signal at the output of the measurement interferometer.

16. The interferometric measurement device according to claim 1, wherein, said filtering interferometer comprises a fiber-optic interferometer, said measurement interferometer comprises a fiber-optic SAGNAC ring interferometer, and a length of the optical fiber of the filtering interferometer is between 2% and 5% longer than a length of the optical fiber of the SAGNAC ring interferometer.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES

(1) In the appended drawings:

(2) FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an interferometric measurement device according to a first embodiment;

(3) FIG. 2 is a schematic view of an optical mounting allowing to measure the performances of a filtering interferometer entering into the construction of the interferometric measurement device of FIG. 1;

(4) FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a two-wave filtering interferometer of the Mach-Zehnder type entering into the construction of the interferometric measurement device according to the first embodiment;

(5) FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a multiple-wave filtering interferometer of the ring resonator type entering into the construction of the interferometric measurement device according to the first embodiment;

(6) FIG. 5 shows, in linear ordinate, the transmission curves normalised in frequency of the filtering interferometer according to the two variants of FIGS. 3 and 4;

(7) FIG. 6 shows, in logarithmic ordinate, the curves of frequency variations of the excess relative intensity noise power density obtained for the filtering interferometer according to the variants of FIGS. 3 and 4;

(8) FIG. 7 is a schematic view of an interferometric measurement device according to a second embodiment;

(9) FIG. 8 is a schematic view of an optical mounting allowing to measure the performances of a filtering interferometer entering into the construction of the interferometric measurement device of FIG. 7;

(10) FIG. 9 is a schematic view of a two-wave filtering interferometer of the Mach-Zehnder type, in dual-passage configuration, entering into the construction of the interferometric measurement device according to the second embodiment;

(11) FIG. 10 is a schematic view of a filtering interferometer comprising a fiber-optic ring resonator in the dual-passage configuration, entering into the construction of the interferometric measurement device according to the second embodiment;

(12) FIG. 11 shows, in logarithmic ordinate, the curves of frequency variations of the excess relative intensity noise power density obtained for the filtering interferometer according to the variants of FIGS. 9 and 10.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(13) In FIGS. 1 and 7 are shown two schematic views showing an interferometric measurement device according to two embodiments of the invention.

(14) It these two embodiments, the interferometric measurement device 10; 20 includes a light source 1, a measurement interferometer 2 and an optical radiation detector 3.

(15) The light source 1 is herein a broad-spectrum spontaneous emission light source. It is for example an ASE light source based on an optical fiber doped with a rare earth that is erbium (chemical symbol: Er), as those used in the optical telecommunication field.

(16) This light source 1 may be filtered by means of a Bragg filter (not shown), so that it has an optical spectrum of substantially Gaussian shape, which is centred about an average wavelength λ.sub.0 of 1530 nm, i.e. 196 THz in frequency, and which has a full width at half maximum FWHM of 6.5 nm, i.e. 833 GHz, expressed in frequency.

(17) This light source 1 is hence a broad-spectrum light source because the ratio between its full width at half maximum FWHM and its average wavelength λ.sub.0 is equal to 4.2×10.sup.−3, higher than 10.sup.−7.

(18) This light source 1 emits a source light signal 1A marred by an excess relative intensity noise B.sub.RIN whose noise power spectral density is equal to 1/FWHM i.e. 1.2×10.sup.−12/Hz, i.e. −119 dB/Hz.

(19) The photonic noise power spectral density is constant and independent of the frequency, the photonic noise being known to be a white noise.

(20) As mentioned hereinabove, it is known that the excess intensity noise is not strictly a white noise. Nevertheless, for the light source 1 that has a Gaussian optical spectrum of full width at half maximum FWHM=6.5 nm about the average wavelength λ.sub.0=1530 nm, the power spectral density of the excess relative intensity noise may be considered as being constant below a frequency equal to the full width at half maximum in optical frequency FWHM(f), i.e. 833 GHz.

(21) At the output of the measurement interferometer 2, the modulated light signal 2B is attenuated but, with no filtering interferometer 100; 200, would remain marred by the same excess relative intensity noise of −119 dB/Hz as that of the light source 1. With an output power of 50 μW, the relative photonic noise B.sub.ph would be equal to 10.sup.−7/Hz.sup.1/2, i.e. −140 dB/Hz for the relative photonic noise power spectral density.

(22) Hence, for a frequency band comprised between 0 and 100 MHz, for example, the power density of the excess relative intensity noise B.sub.RIN is very higher than the power density of the relative photonic noise, the difference being as high as 21 dB/Hz.

(23) The measurement interferometer 2 of the interferometric measurement device 10; 20 in the two embodiments of the invention herein comprises a fiber-optic SAGNAC ring interferometer.

(24) The measurement interferometer 2 is intended to measure a physical parameter to be measured.

(25) Herein, this physical parameter to be measured is the component Ω.sub.R of the rotational speed of the measurement interferometer 2, according to an axis of rotation perpendicular to the plane or the ring of the SAGNAC interferometer.

(26) As known (see in particular H. Lefèvre, “The Fiber-Optic Gyroscope”, Artech House, 1993), this SAGNAC ring interferometer includes a coil of a preferably single-mode and polarization-maintaining optical fiber, an optical coupler and an Y coupler combined to a pair of phase modulators (not shown elements).

(27) The fiber-optic coil is herein a coil of single-mode fiber of 1 kilometer long, so that the SAGNAC ring interferometer has a proper frequency f.sub.p=103.45 kHz.

(28) The measurement interferometer 2 receives, as an input, a filtered light signal 2A of input light power P.sub.in and delivers, as an output, a modulated light signal 2B of output light power P.sub.out, which is proportional to the input power P.sub.in and depends on the parameter to be measured Ω.sub.R.

(29) The modulation of the modulated light signal 2B is made thanks to the pair of phase modulators of the measurement interferometer 2. The modulation is made desirable so as to improve the signal to noise ratio of the measurement performed by the measurement interferometer 2.

(30) The modulated light signal 2B is hence modulated at a modulation frequency f.sub.m.

(31) Advantageously, it is known that this modulation frequency f.sub.m can be an odd multiple of the proper frequency f.sub.p of the SAGNAC ring interferometer.

(32) In the following, it will be considered that the modulation frequency f.sub.m of the modulated light signal 2B is equal to the proper frequency f.sub.p of the interferometer, i.e. f.sub.m=f.sub.p=103.45 kHz for a fiber-optic coil of 1 km long.

(33) The interferometric measurement device 10; 20 hence also includes an optical radiation detector 3 that is sensitive to and receives the modulated light signal 2B exiting from the measurement interferometer 2.

(34) The optical radiation detector 3 herein comprises a semi-conductor PIN photodiode.

(35) The optical radiation detector 3 delivers a modulated electric signal 3A that is a signal representative of the output light power P.sub.out.

(36) The modulated light signal 2B being a modulated signal, the modulated electric signal 3A is also modulated, at the same modulation frequency f.sub.m=f.sub.p=103.45 kHz.

(37) It will be noted that such a modulation frequency f.sub.m is a relatively low frequency from an electronic point of view, so that the photodiode 3 follows with no difficulty the modulated light signal 2B.

(38) In the two embodiments of the invention, shown in FIGS. 1 and 7, the interferometric measurement device 10; 20 also includes signal processing means 4 that exploit, by demodulation, the modulated electric signal 3A delivered by the optical radiation detector 3 so as to determine the component Ω.sub.R of the rotational speed of the measurement interferometer 2.

(39) In order to reduce the excess intensity noise of the light source 1 of the interferometric measurement device 10; 20, a filtering interferometer 100, 200 is also provided, which is intended to flute the optical spectrum of the source light signal 1A.

(40) This filtering interferometer 100, 200 may indifferently be placed either between the light source 1 and the measurement interferometer 2, or between the measurement interferometer 2 and the optical radiation detector 3.

(41) For the sake of clarity, the description developed hereinafter only refers to the first alternative.

(42) Hence, in the two embodiments of the invention, shown in FIGS. 1 and 7, the filtering interferometer 100; 200 is herein placed between the light source 1 and the measurement interferometer 2, so that the filtering interferometer 100; 200 receives, as an input, the source light signal 1A and delivers, as an output, the filtered light signal 2A.

(43) In the two embodiments of the interferometric measurement device 10; 20 shown in FIGS. 1 and 7, the filtering interferometer 100; 200 comprises a fiber-optic interferometer (see FIGS. 3, 4, 9, and 10).

(44) In this configuration, it is advantageously provided that the length of the optical fiber of the filtering interferometer 100, 200 is slightly higher, preferably between 2% and 5% longer, than the length of the optical fiber of the measurement interferometer 2, when the latter comprises a SAGNAC ring interferometer.

(45) Using a longer optical fiber for the filtering interferometer 100; 200 allows to then free from spurious signals on the filtered light signal 2A coming from the back scattering in the optical fiber of the measurement interferometer 2.

(46) Indeed, from the coherence point of view, the light source 1 emits a wave train of coherence time τ.sub.c equal to the inverse of the full width at half maximum FWHM of the spectrum in optical frequency (τ.sub.c=1/FWHM), i.e. the coherence time τ.sub.c is of the order of one picosecond (1 ps) for a full width at half maximum FWHM of 1 THz. After the filtering interferometer 100; 200, this wave train goes out into a series of coherent wave trains spaced from each other by the time of propagation in the filtering interferometer 100; 200. If this time of propagation is higher than the time of propagation in the measurement interferometer 2, a wave train of the series will enter after any back scattering of the previous wave train, hence avoiding problems of coherence noise.

(47) In order to evaluate the performances of the filtering interferometer 100; 200, analysis means are used, which comprise, on the one hand, a photo-detector 5 and, on the other hand, an electric spectrum analyzer 6.

(48) The photo-detector 5 delivers an electric signal 5A to the electric spectrum analyzer 6, this electric signal 5A exhibiting an electric noise, whose spectral power distribution is directly linked (linearly in the case of a photo-detector 5 used in its zone of linearity) to the noise power spectral density of the filtered light signal 2A.

(49) The electric spectrum analyzer 6 then delivers a curve 6A representative of the value of the excess intensity noise power density as a function of the frequency. This result is expressed in dB.Math.Volt (symbol: dB.Math.V).

(50) In other words, the electric noise power density measured by the spectrum analyzer 6 at an electric frequency f.sub.elec (order of magnitude of f.sub.elec: between 0 and 10 MHz) is the quadratic mean of the beats between all the components of the filtered light signal 2A, at the optical frequencies f.sub.opt (order of magnitude of f.sub.opt: about 200 THz) and f.sub.opt+f.sub.elec of the optical spectrum of the filtered light signal 2A, respectively.

First Embodiment

(51) In a first embodiment of the invention, shown in FIG. 1, the filtering interferometer 100 is configured as a single-passage type interferometer.

(52) In a first variant, shown in FIG. 3, the filtering interferometer 100 is a two-wave interferometer.

(53) More precisely, according to this first variant of the first embodiment, the filtering interferometer 100 is an interferometer of the Mach-Zehnder type.

(54) The source light signal 1A is injected into the filtering interferometer 100 by means of an optical fiber coupled to the input arm 100A of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer.

(55) The source light signal 1A, of power P.sub.0, is then split into two light signals by means of an input Y coupler 103, which is herein designed so that the two corresponding split light signals are of equal power P.sub.0/2.

(56) The two split light signals then propagate in the two optical waveguides 101, 102, to then recombine together at an output Y coupler 104, the two split light signals being superimposed and interfering with each other to form the filtered light signal 2A transmitted on the output arm 100B, then coupled in an optical fiber to be driven to the fibered photo-detector 5 so as to measure the light power of the filtered light signal 2A.

(57) The filtering interferometer 100 is unbalanced, i.e. at the output of the filtering interferometer 100, the light signal that has passed in the first optical waveguide 101 and the light signal that has passed in the second optical waveguide 102 are phase-shifted relative to each other by a phase shift Δφ that is non zero.

(58) For that purpose, the filtering interferometer 100 includes, on the path of the second light signal, a fiber-optic coil 105 of optical length ΔL.sub.opt. By definition, the optical length ΔL.sub.opt is the product of the geometric length (in meters) of the fiber-optic coil 105 by the optical index of the latter, which is, for the wavelength domain of the light source 1, in the case of a silica optical fiber, equal to about 1.45. Hence, the optical length ΔL.sub.opt is herein equal to 1.45.Math.10.sup.3 m, allowing to introduce a phase difference Δφ=(2π/c).Math.f.sub.opt×ΔL.sub.opt (c≈3×10.sup.8 m.Math.s.sup.−1 being the speed of light) between the two arms of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer.

(59) The filtered light signal 2A at the output of the filtering interferometer 100 has then an input light power P.sub.in=P.sub.0 cos.sup.2(Δφ/2)=P.sub.0 cos.sup.2(π.Math.f.sub.opt.Math.Δf.sub.opt/c).

(60) The filtering interferometer 100 has thus a response, equal to the ratio P.sub.in/P.sub.0 between the input light power P.sub.in and the source light power P.sub.0, which is periodic as a function of the optical frequency f.sub.opt of the input light signal 1A.

(61) In FIG. 5 are shown the response functions of the filtering interferometer 100 in the first embodiment, where the filtering interferometer 100 is an interferometer configured in single-passage mode.

(62) The curve R1 of FIG. 5 corresponds to the response function of the filtering interferometer 100 according to the first variant where filtering interferometer 100 is a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, hence a two-waves interferometer.

(63) In FIG. 5, it can be seen, as known, that the response function of an unbalanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer is in square cosine and thus periodic, the period being called the free spectral range ISL.

(64) Moreover, the reduced optical frequency f.sub.opt/ISL has been reported, on the abscissa axis of FIG. 5, from value k to value k+5. This representation will allow to compare the different response curves R1, R2, R3 of FIG. 5.

(65) The free spectral range ISL of the filtering interferometer 100 in this first variant of the first embodiment of the interferometric measurement device 10 is herein equal to c/ΔL.sub.opt=206.9 kHz.

(66) As the average optical frequency f.sub.0 of the light source 1 is far higher than the free spectral range ISL, because it is equal to f.sub.0=c/λ.sub.0=196 THz, the value k is herein of the order of 10.sup.9.

(67) The light transmission, and hence the response, is maximum and equal to 1 when the phase difference Δφ is equal to 2 k.Math.π, k being a natural number, and the light transmission, and also the response, is minimum when the phase difference Δφ is equal to (2k′+1).Math.π, k′ being also a natural number.

(68) The flutes introduced in the spectrum of the filtered light signal 2A are perfectly contrasted, i.e. the minima of the light transmission are null, when the input coupler 103 and the output coupler 104 are 50/50 couplers, splitting equally the source light signal 1A in the two arms 101, 102 of the filtering interferometer 100 (see FIG. 3).

(69) The contrast of the flutes is defined as being the ratio between the difference and the sum of the maximum value of the light transmission (respectively of the response) and of the minimum value of the light transmission (respectively of the response).

(70) Two successive transmission maxima are distant, in frequency, by the free spectral range ISL. Likewise, two successive transmission minima are distant, in frequency, by the free spectral range ISL equal to c/ΔL.sub.opt.

(71) Moreover, the distance, expressed in frequency, between a transmission maximum and an adjacent transmission minimum is equal to half the free spectral range ISL (also expressed in frequency), i.e. ISL/2.

(72) Another important parameter of the response of the filtering interferometer 100 is its finesse F. The latter is defined as being the ratio between the free spectral range ISL, expressed in frequency, and the full width at half maximum FWHM(f) of the flutes.

(73) Hence, in this first variant of the first embodiment, the finesse F of the two-waves filtering interferometer 100 is herein equal to 2, the width of the flutes of the response function R1 (see FIG. 5) being equal to half the period of these same flutes.

(74) In a second variant, shown in FIG. 4, the filtering interferometer 100 is a multiple-wave resonant interferometer.

(75) More precisely, according to this second variant of the first embodiment, the filtering interferometer 100 comprises a ring resonator 101.

(76) It is known that, from the point of view of its light transmission or its response, such a filtering interferometer 100 is equivalent to a Fabry-Perot interferometer.

(77) The source light signal 1A is injected in the filtering interferometer 100 by mean of an optical fiber coupled to the input port 100A of the filtering interferometer 100.

(78) The source light signal 1A, of power P.sub.0, is then coupled to a fiber-optic ring 101 by means of an input fiber-optic coupler 103.

(79) Generally, a fiber-optic coupler has a coupling coefficient C that corresponds to the ratio between the light power coupled in the fiber-optic ring 101 and the power of the source light power 1A injected in the input port 100A.

(80) After coupling, the light signal circulates in the fiber-optic ring 101 and at each turn in this fiber-optic ring 101, a portion of the light signal is taken and coupled towards an output port 100B of the filtering interferometer 100 by mean of an output fiber-optic coupler 104, which is herein identical to the input fiber-optic coupler 103, and has hence the same coupling coefficient C as the input fiber-optic coupler 103.

(81) Complementary, the portion of the light signal incident on the output fiber-optic coupler 104 that is not coupled towards the output port 100B is transmitted in the fiber-optic ring 101 of the filtering interferometer 100 with a transmission coefficient T.

(82) Likewise, this transmission coefficient T is defined as being the ratio between the light power transmitted by one of the fiber-optic couplers in the fiber-optic ring 101 and the light power incident on this coupler inside the fiber-optic ring 101.

(83) The coupling coefficient C and the transmission coefficient T are linked by the following relation: 1−(C+T)=A, where the term A corresponds to the intrinsic losses of the fiber-optic ring 101 corresponding essentially to the losses by absorption or by scattering in the ring 101.

(84) It will be considered, in the following, that the losses in the ring 101 are very low, typically of the order of a few percent, so that they can be neglected in the remaining of the description. Hence, the following relation is verified: C+T=1.

(85) It will be understood in the light of the description of FIG. 4, that the filtering interferometer 100 herein operates like an optical resonator, a plurality of waves circulating in the ring 101 of the filtering interferometer 100, so that the different light signals coupled towards the output port 100B by the output coupler 104 are superimposed and interfere with each other to form the filtered light signal 2A transmitted on the output port 100B, then coupled in an optical fiber to be driven towards the fibered photo-detector 5 so as to measure the light power of the filtered light signal 2A.

(86) As shown in FIG. 4, the filtering interferometer 100 herein includes a fiber-optic coil 105, of optical length ΔL.sub.opt herein also equal to 1.45.Math.10.sup.3 m, arranged in the ring 101 of the filtering interferometer 100.

(87) So configured in this second variant, the filtering interferometer 100 filters the source light signal 1A and delivers the filtered light signal 2A.

(88) In FIG. 5 are shown response curves P.sub.in/P.sub.0 of such a filtering interferometer 100 as a function of different values of the coupling coefficient C and transmission coefficient T.

(89) As known, these response curves P.sub.in/P.sub.0 follow a law of the type: P.sub.in/P.sub.0=1/[1+m sin.sup.2(Δφ/2)], where Δφ is the phase difference introduced by the filtering interferometer 100 during the propagation over one turn of the fiber-optic ring 101, and m represents, as in a Fabry-Perot interferometer, the “Airy factor” of the filtering interferometer 100 in a ring resonator configuration (see FIG. 4).

(90) This Airy factor is linked to the transmission coefficient T of the two fiber-optic couplers 103, 104 by the relation: m=4.Math.T/(1−T).sup.2=4.Math.T/C.sup.2 (because C+T=1, see supra).

(91) The curve R2 corresponds to a filtering interferometer 100 in the second variant of the first embodiment, where the couplers 103, 104 of the filtering interferometer 100 have a coupling coefficient C equal to 50% and a transmission coefficient T equal to 50%.

(92) The curve R3 corresponds to a filtering interferometer 100 in the second variant of the first embodiment, where the couplers 103, 104 of the filtering interferometer 100 have a coupling coefficient C equal to 5% and a transmission coefficient T equal to 95%.

(93) Let's remind here that, the reduced optical frequency f.sub.opt/ISL is reported on the abscissa axis, ISL being the free spectral range of the filtering interferometer 100.

(94) Conventionally, it is found that the response curves of a ring resonator are periodic, the flutes being also separated by the free spectral range ISL.

(95) As known, the free spectral range ISL of the filtering interferometer 100 has a free spectral range ISL equal to c/L.sub.ann where L.sub.ann is the optical length of the resonant ring of the filtering interferometer 100, comprising the fiber-optic ring 101 and the fiber-optic coil 105.

(96) It will be considered herein that, in the case of a filtering interferometer 100 shown in FIG. 4, the flutes obtained are not perfectly contrasted.

(97) Indeed, the response curves R2, R3 have minimum values of transmission that are not null but equal to 1/(1+m), the contrast of the flutes being hence equal to m/(m+2).

(98) Moreover, as known, the finesse F of a ring resonator, similar to a Fabry-Perot interferometer is such that F=πm.sup.1/2/2.

(99) It is hence recognised in FIG. 5 that, for the filtering interferometer 100 of FIG. 4: the contrast of the flutes increases if the transmission coefficient T of the couplers 103, 104 of the filtering interferometer 100 increases, and the finesse F also increases with this transmission coefficient T.

(100) The response curve R3 of FIG. 5 being obtained for a transmission coefficient T equal to 95%, this response curve R3 has thinner and more contrasted flutes than the response curve R2 of FIG. 5 that has been obtained for a transmission coefficient T equal to 50%.

(101) The different parameters of the multiple-wave filtering interferometer 100 in this second variant of the first embodiment have been reported in Table 1 hereinafter.

(102) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 (single passage) Response curve R2 Response curve R3 Coupling coefficient C 50%  5% Transmission coefficient T 50% 95% Optical length of the 1450 1450 ring L.sub.ann (m) Airy factor m 8 1520 Contrast 0.8 0.999 Finesse F 4.4 61.2 Free spectral range ISL (kHz) 206.9 206.9 Ratio f.sub.m/ISL 0.5 0.5 (f.sub.m = 103.45 kHz)

(103) In FIG. 6 are shown, in logarithmic ordinate, curves S0, S1, S2, S3 of noise power density obtained by the spectrum analyzer 6 of FIG. 2.

(104) These curves S0, S1, S2, S3 show the variations (reduction or increase) of the power spectral density, expressed in decibels, of the excess relative intensity noise B.sub.RIN as a function of the reduced electric frequency f.sub.elec/ISL before and after filtering by the filtering interferometer 100.

(105) Hence, the curve S0 of FIG. 6, which corresponds to the excess relative intensity noise power spectral density of the source light signal 1A having not been filtered by the filtering interferometer 100, has a constant value equal to 0 dB.

(106) The curves S1, S2, S3 themselves correspond to the response curves R1, R2, R3 of FIG. 5.

(107) In FIG. 6 are shown, for each curve S1, S2, S3, a frequency interval INT1, INT2, INT3, that is centred about an optimum frequency f.sub.optim equal to ISL/2 and of width Δf equal to [0.9−(3/2F)] ISL.

(108) It is observed that, for each curve S1, S2, S3, the frequency interval INT1, INT2, INT3 comprises the modulation frequency f.sub.m of the measurement interferometer 2.

(109) Moreover, for this frequency interval INT1, INT2, INT3, and in particular for the modulation frequency f.sub.m, it is observed that the excess relative intensity noise power density of the curves S1, S2, S3 has been reduced with respect to the curve S0 corresponding to the non-filtered source light signal 1A.

(110) More precisely, for the two-wave filtering interferometer 100 of FIG. 3, the value of the excess intensity noise power density on the filtered light signal 2A has been reduced by 3 dB (curve S1) with respect to the non-filtered light signal (curve S0).

(111) Likewise, for multiple-wave the filtering interferometer 100 of FIG. 4, in the case of a coupling coefficient C equal to 50% (curve S2), the value of the excess intensity noise power density on the filtered light signal 2A has been reduced by 2 dB with respect to the non-filtered light signal (curve S0).

(112) For the ring-resonator filtering interferometer 100 of FIG. 4, in the case of a coupling coefficient C equal to 5% (curve S3), the value of the excess intensity noise power density on the filtered light signal 2A has been reduced by 13 dB with respect to the non-filtered light signal (curve S0).

(113) The filtering efficiency difference between the curves S2 and S3 is essentially due to the fact that the flutes of the associated response curve R2 are less contrasted than those of the response curve R3.

(114) Indeed, the excess relative intensity noise at the frequency ISL/2 is essentially due to the interferometric beat between the optical frequencies 2k.Math.ISL of the transmission maxima and the transmission minima offset by a frequency ISL/2 and this interferometric beat depends on the square root of the product of the light powers. It is hence essential that these minima are the closest possible to zero.

(115) The different values (in dB) of reduction of the excess relative intensity noise (RIN) power density at the optimum frequency f.sub.optim=ISL/2 for the three previous cases (see curves S1, S2 and S3 of FIG. 6), as well as for other values of the ratio T/C of transmission coefficient T to coupling coefficient C of the optical couplers 103, 104 of the filtering interferometer 100 are reported in Table 2.

(116) In Table 2 are also reported: the finesse F for each of the configurations of the filtering interferometer 100, the value of the light transmission average, expressed in dB, and the different values (in dB) of increase of the excess relative intensity noise (RIN) power density at the frequency equal to the free spectral interval ISL, this frequency corresponding to the beats of the flutes of the optical spectrum of the light source 1 that are separated in frequency by this free spectral range ISL (see FIG. 5).

(117) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 (dual passage) Reduction of the RIN Increase of the RIN Average power density at the power density at Ratio T (%)/C (%) Finesse F transmission frequency ISL/2 the frequency ISL Mach- 2  −3 dB  −3 dB  +2 dB Zehnder (S1) 50/50 (S2) 4  −5 dB  −2 dB  +2 dB 60/40 6  −6 dB  −3 dB  +3 dB 70/30 9 −7.5 dB  −4.5 dB  +4.5 dB  80/20 14 −9.5 dB  −6.5 dB  +6.5 dB  90/10 30 −13 dB −10 dB +10 dB  95/5 (S3) 61 −16 dB −13 dB +13 dB 99/1  312 −22 dB −21 dB +19 dB

(118) It is observed in Table 2 that the more high the ratio T/C, i.e. the more fine and contrasted the flutes, the more reduced the excess relative intensity noise B.sub.RIN at the optimum frequency f.sub.optim=ISL/2, in the light signal 2A filtered by the filtering interferometer 100.

(119) Conversely, the excess relative intensity noise B.sub.RIN is increased, at the frequency equal to the free spectral range ISL, in the light signal 2A filtered by the filtering interferometer 100.

(120) However, using a filtering interferometer 100 that has a high ratio T/C, it is observed that the average light transmission strongly reduces. Indeed, the average light transmission is approximately proportional to the inverse of the finesse F, the latter increasing with the ratio T/C.

(121) This reduction of the light power of the light signal 2A filtered by the filtering interferometer 100 then causes an increase of the relative photonic noise of this filtered light signal 2A.

(122) To sum-up, it has been seen that it was possible to design a filtering interferometer 100, i.e. herein to adjust the free spectral range ISL and the finesse F thereof so that the modulation frequency f.sub.m of the filtered light signal 2A that will be used by the measurement interferometer 2 to perform the measurement of the parameter to be measured Ω.sub.R is comprised in the frequency interval INT1, INT2, INT3 centred about the optimum frequency ISL/2 and the width Δf=[0.9−(3/2F)] ISL.

(123) That way, the excess intensity noise on the filtered light signal 2A is reduced with respect to a non-filtered light signal.

(124) This solution is general, and it is not needed that the modulation frequency f.sub.m is close to the value ISL/2.

(125) Indeed, in the most general case, the frequency interval INT1, INT2, INT3 may be centred at any frequency equal to (2k+1) ISL/2, these frequencies corresponding to dark fringes, i.e. troughs of the response curve about which the excess intensity noise is reduced.

(126) Let's note that the operation described does not need polarization-maintaining fiber. Indeed, an ordinary single-mode optical fiber that does not maintain the polarization, has always two polarization-orthogonal eigenmodes. These two eigenmodes have a slightly different index and will hence lead to a slightly different free spectral range ISL, but in terms of reduction of the excess relative intensity noise at low frequencies, the two modes will have the same behaviour.

(127) In order to improve the reduction of the excess relative intensity noise, without too much reduction of the transmitted average light power that increases the relative photonic noise, a dual-passage configuration filtering interferometer may be used.

(128) Hence, with respect to a single-passage configuration as above, the contrast of the flutes is improved and, for a given reduction of excess relative intensity noise, the finesse of the dual-passage filtering interferometer is lower and hence the attenuation of the filtered light signal is limited.

Second Embodiment

(129) Hence, in FIG. 7 is shown an interferometric measurement device 20 including a filtering interferometer 200 in dual-passage configuration.

(130) In a first variant, shown in FIG. 9, the filtering interferometer 200 comprises a two-waves interferometer, of the Mach-Zehnder type, similar to the interferometer 100 of FIG. 3.

(131) Moreover, this filtering interferometer 200 herein comprises a mirror 206 placed after the second Y coupler 204 so that the light signal exiting through the second port 200B is reflected towards the Y coupler 204 to circulate again in the Mach-Zehnder interferometer 200.

(132) That way, the light signal entering into the filtering interferometer 200 through the first port 200A, also exits from this first port 200A after recirculation in the two arms of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer.

(133) It will be noted that a two-wave filtering interferometer of the Michelson type would not operate in dual-passage configuration because the return wave would be mixed with the wave reflected at the first passage.

(134) In dual-passage configuration, it is advantageous to control the polarization so that the light signal propagates in the filtering interferometer 200 according to the same natural polarization mode in the forward and return trips.

(135) For that purpose, the filtering interferometer 200 herein comprises a polarization-maintaining optical fiber.

(136) In the same way, in a second variant, shown in FIG. 10, the filtering interferometer 200 comprises an multiple-wave ring resonant interferometer similar to the filtering interferometer 100 of FIG. 4.

(137) It will be noted, as hereinabove, that a multiple-wave filtering interferometer of the Fabry-Perot type would not operate in a dual-passage configuration because the return wave would be mixed with the wave reflected at the first passage.

(138) For the same reasons as hereinabove, the filtering interferometer 200 herein comprises a polarisation-maintaining optical fiber.

(139) Moreover, the ring of the multiple-wave filtering interferometer 200 (see FIG. 10) has advantageously a null surface, otherwise, this resonator being also sensitive to the SAGNAC effect, the flutes of the return path are offset with respect to the forward path leading to very high losses.

(140) Such a null-surface configuration may be made in two different ways: the resonator is made thanks an optical fiber folded over itself from its middle, then rolled, or the resonator is split into two similar half fiber-optic coils whose axes are in the opposite direction.

(141) This filtering interferometer 200 also comprises a mirror 206 placed after the second fiber coupler 204.

(142) The filtering interferometer 200 being so configured, with the source light signal and the filtered light signal 2A entering and exiting through the same port of the filtering interferometer 200, the interferometric measurement device 20 then includes an optical circulator 7 allowing firstly to direct the source light beam 1A toward the filtering interferometer 200, then to direct the filtered light beam 2A towards the measurement interferometer 2.

(143) To compensate for the losses generated in the filtering interferometer 200, the interferometric measurement device 20 preferentially includes an optical amplifier 8 placed between the filtering interferometer 200 and the measurement interferometer 2.

(144) More precisely, the optical amplifier 8 is herein placed after the optical circulator 7, and before the measurement interferometer 2.

(145) The optical amplifier 8 is herein a doped-fiber optical amplifier, for example an optical amplifier based on a fiber doped with a rare earth such as erbium (“Erbium-doped fiber amplifier” or EDFA).

(146) In FIG. 8 is shown an example of optical bench that can be used to evaluate the performances of the filtering interferometer 200 when the latter is in dual-passage configuration.

(147) This bench comprises the light source 1, the optical circulator 7, the filtering interferometer 200 and the optical amplifier 8. Similarly to the first embodiment (see FIG. 2), this optical bench also comprises analysis means with its photo-detector 5 and its electric spectrum analyzer 6, which delivers the electric spectrum 6A allowing to determine the variation of excess intensity noise obtained thanks to the filtering interferometer 200.

(148) Hence, in FIG. 11 are shown the curves S1, S2, S3 obtained with the spectrum analyzer of FIG. 8, by normalizing at 0 dB the original excess intensity noise power density, these curves representing the values of reduction (or increase) of the excess intensity noise as a function of the reduced electric frequency.

(149) The curve S1 is obtained for a filtering interferometer 200 of the same type as that described in FIG. 9, which is a two-wave interferometer.

(150) The curve S2 is obtained for a filtering interferometer 200 of the same type as that of FIG. 10, which is a multiple-wave resonant interferometer, wherein the coupling coefficient C is equal to 50% and the transmission coefficient T is equal to 50%.

(151) The curve S3 is obtained for a filtering interferometer 200 of the same type as that of FIG. 10, which is a multiple-wave resonant interferometer, wherein the coupling coefficient C is equal to 5% and the transmission coefficient T is equal to 95%.

(152) In FIG. 11 are shown, for each curve S1, S2, S3, a frequency interval INT1, INT2, INT3 that is centred about an optimum frequency f.sub.optim also equal herein to ISL/2 and of width Δf equal to [0.9−(3/2F)] ISL.

(153) It can be observed that, for each curve S1, S2, S3, the frequency interval INT1, INT2, INT3 comprises the modulation frequency f.sub.m of the measurement interferometer 2.

(154) Moreover, for this frequency interval INT1, INT2, INT3, and in particular for the modulation frequency f.sub.m, it is observed that the excess intensity noise of the curves S1, S2, S3 has been reduced with respect to the curve S0 corresponding to a non-filtered light signal.

(155) More particularly, for the filtering interferometer 200 of FIG. 9, which is a two-wave interferometer, the value of the excess intensity noise power density on the filtered light signal 2A has been reduced by −8 dB (curve S1) with respect to the non-filtered light signal (curve S0).

(156) Likewise, for the filtering interferometer 200 of FIG. 10, which is a multiple-wave resonant interferometer, in this case a coupling coefficient C equal to 50% (curve S2), the value of the excess intensity noise power density on the filtered light signal 2A has been reduced by −8 dB with respect to the non-filtered light signal (curve S0).

(157) For the filtering interferometer 200 of FIG. 10, which is a multiple-wave resonant interferometer, in this case a coupling coefficient C equal to 5% (curve S3), the value of the excess intensity noise power density on the filtered light signal 2A has been reduced by −42 dB with respect to the non-filtered light signal (curve S0).

(158) The different values of reduction of the excess relative intensity noise (RIN) power density at the optimum frequency f.sub.optim=ISL/2 for the three previous cases (see curves S1, S2 and S3 of FIG. 11), as well as for other values of the ratio T/C of transmission coefficient T to coupling coefficient C of the optical couplers 203, 204 of the filtering interferometer 200 are reported in Table 3.

(159) In Table 3 are also reported: the value of the light transmission average, expressed in dB, and the different values of increase of the excess relative intensity noise (RIN) power density at the frequency equal to the free spectral range ISL.

(160) TABLE-US-00003 Tableau 3 (dual passage) Reduction of the RIN Increase of the RIN Average power density at the (dB.V) at the Ratio T (%)/C (%) Finesse F transmission frequency ISL/2 frequency ISL Mach- 2.8   −4 dB   −8 dB   +3 dB Zehnder (S1) 50/50 (S2) 5.7   −7 dB   −8 dB   +5 dB 60/40 8.5   −9 dB   −12 dB  +6.5 dB 70/30 12.7   −10 dB −16.5 dB  +8.5 dB 80/20 19.8 −12.5 dB −22.5 dB +10.5 dB 90/10 42.4 −15.5 dB −32.5 dB +13.5 dB  95/5 (S3) 86.3 −18.5 dB   −42 dB +16.5 dB 99/1  441.2 −24.5 dB −65.5 dB   +21 dB

(161) It is hence observed that, when the filtering interferometer 200 is configured in dual-passage mode (case of the interferometric measurement device 20 of FIG. 7), an efficient reduction of the excess intensity noise B.sub.RIN on the filtered light signal 2A is obtained with far less attenuation of the transmitted average light power than with the single-passage filtering interferometer 100 of the first embodiment (see for example Table 2).

(162) This is due to the fact that the recirculation of the light signal in the filtering interferometer 200, thanks to the mirror 206, allows to accentuate the troughs between the flutes and to obtain a far better contrast of these latter.

(163) Even reduced in dual-passage, for a given RIN reduction, the optical power attenuation remains significant (see FIG. 3). It is hence advantageous to re-amplify the filtered light signal 2A at the output of the filtering interferometer 200 by means of the optical amplifier 8.

(164) Hence, in this variant of the second embodiment (see FIG. 10), in which the filtering interferometer 200 comprises a ring resonator and two optical couplers 203, 204, the ratios T/C of transmission coefficient T to coupling coefficient C of the optical couplers 203, 204 of the filtering interferometer 200 are, preferably, comprised between 70/30 and 95/5.

(165) Still more preferably, the ratio T/C is comprised between 80/20 and 90/10.

(166) In this second embodiment, it will then be taken care that the total relative noise power density at the input of the optical amplifier 8 is at least lower by 3 to 5 dB than the relative photonic noise desired at the output of the full system.