Non-oriented electrical steel sheet being less in deterioration of iron loss property by punching

Abstract

A non-oriented electrical steel sheet has a chemical composition having C: not more than 0.005 mass %, Si: 2-7 mass %, Mn: 0.033 mass %, Al: not more than 3 mass %, P: not more than 0.2 mass %, S: not more than 0.005 mass %, N: not more than 0.005 mass %, Se: 0.0001˜0.0005 mass %, As: 0.0005˜0.005 mass % and the remainder being Fe and inevitable impurities, and an iron loss W.sub.15/50 in excitation at 50 Hz and 1.5 T of not more than 3.5 W/kg and a ratio (x/t) of amount of shear drop x (mm) to thickness t (mm) in punching of steel sheet of not more than 0.15 and is excellent in the iron loss property before punching and less in the deterioration of the iron loss property by punching.

Claims

1. A non-oriented electrical steel sheet having chemical composition comprising C: not more than 0.005 mass %, Si: 2˜7 mass %, Mn: 0.03˜3 mass %, Al: not more than 3 mass %, P: not more than 0.2 mass %, S: not more than 0.005 mass %, N: not more than 0.005 mass %, Se: 0.0001˜0.0005 mass %, As: 0.0005˜0.005 mass % and the remainder being Fe and inevitable impurities, and an iron loss W.sub.15/50 in excitation at 50 Hz and 1.5 T of not more than 3.5 W/kg, a ratio (x/t) of amount of shear drop x (mm) to thickness t (mm) in punching of steel sheet of not more than 0.15, and an average crystal grain size of 30˜150 μm.

2. The non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1 containing either one or both of Sn: 0.003˜0.5 mass % and Sb: 0.003˜0.5 mass % in addition to the chemical composition.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a view defining an amount of shear drop by punching.

(2) FIG. 2 is a view illustrating a method of measuring iron loss with a test specimen of 30 mm in width and a test specimen of 10 mm in width by Epstein test.

(3) FIG. 3 is a graph showing an influence of a ratio of amount of shear drop x to thickness t (x/t) upon iron loss deterioration ratio.

(4) FIG. 4 is a graph showing an influence of Se content upon a ratio of amount of shear drop x to thickness t (x/t) and iron loss W.sub.15/50.

(5) FIG. 5 is a graph showing an influence of As content upon a ratio of amount of shear drop x to thickness t (x/t) and iron loss W.sub.15/50.

(6) FIG. 6 is a graph showing an influence of average crystal grain size upon a ratio of amount of shear drop x to thickness t (x/t) and iron loss W.sub.15/50.

EMBODIMENTS FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

(7) Experiments providing an opportunity to develop the invention will be described below.

(8) <Experiment 1>

(9) In order to research an influence of a size of shear drop generated by punching (amount of shear drop) upon iron loss property, a steel slab containing C: 0.0025 mass %, Si: 3.0 mass %, Al: 0.5 mass %, Mn: 0.5 mass %, P: 0.01 mass %, N: 0.0018 mass %, S: 0.0019 mass %, Se: 0.0001 mass % and As: 0.0010 mass % is heated at 1100° C. for 30 minutes and hot rolled to form a hot rolled sheet of 2.0 mm in thickness, and the hot rolled sheet is subjected to a hot band annealing at 980° C. for 30 seconds and cold rolled at once to form cold rolled sheets having various thicknesses of 0.20˜0.50 mm, and thereafter these sheets are subjected to a finish annealing at 950° C. for 10 seconds and coated with an insulating coating to obtain non-oriented electrical steel sheets (product sheets). Moreover, the average crystal grain size at a section of the product sheet in the rolling direction (L-direction) is about 80 μm as measured by linear intercept method.

(10) Then, a test specimen with a length of 180 mm and a width of 30 mm and a test specimen with a length of 180 mm and a width of 10 mm are taken out from the product sheet in L-direction and C-direction by punching set to a clearance of 5%. The clearance means a value (%) obtained by dividing a gap between punch and die by a thickness of the sheet to be worked. Also, a size of shear drop (amount of shear drop) is measured at an edge face of the test specimen punched at a width of 10 mm. Here, the amount of shear drop is defined as shown in FIG. 1.

(11) With the above test specimens, iron loss W.sub.15/50 is measured by Epstein test. In this case, the measurement of the test specimen with a width of 10 mm is performed by arranging three test specimens in widthwise direction so as to provide a width of 30 mm as shown in FIG. 2. In such a measurement of the iron loss, two shear portions are included in the test specimens arranged at a width of 30 mm, so that the influence of the punching upon the iron loss property can be evaluated. Moreover, the influence of the punching upon the iron loss property is evaluated by a deterioration ratio of iron loss W.sub.15/50 of test specimen with a width of 10 mm to iron loss W.sub.15/50 of test specimen with a width of 30 mm (iron loss deterioration ratio) as defined in the following equation:
Iron loss deterioration ratio (%)={(W.sub.15/50(10 mm width))−(W.sub.15/50(30 mm width))}/(W.sub.15/50(30 mm width))×100

(12) The measured results are shown in FIG. 3 as a relation between the ratio of amount of shear drop x to thickness t (x/t) in punching and the iron loss deterioration ratio. As seen from this figure, the iron loss deterioration ratio can be reduced to not more than 20% when the ratio of amount of shear drop x to thickness t (x/t) is made to not more than 0.15. This is considered due to the fact that as the ratio of amount of shear drop to thickness (x/t) becomes large, compression stress is retained in the vicinity of the edge face produced by punching to deteriorate the magnetic properties. From this result, the ratio of amount of shear drop x to thickness t (x/t) is set to not more than 0.15 in the invention.

(13) <Experiment 2>

(14) Next, the inventors have made the following experiment by taking notice of Se and As, which are grain boundary segregation type elements for weakening grain boundary strength, as a measure reducing the amount of shear drop at the edge face produced by punching.

(15) A steel slab containing C: 0.0030 mass %, Si: 2.5 mass %, Al: 1 mass %, Mn: 0.5 mass %, P: 0.01 mass %, N: 0.0020 mass %, S: 0.0022 mass %, Se: 0.0001˜0.002 mass % and As: 0.0001˜0.010 mass % is heated at 1100° C. for 30 minutes and hot rolled to form a hot rolled sheet of 2.0 mm in thickness, and the hot rolled sheet is subjected to a hot hand annealing at 980° C. for 30 seconds and cold rolled at once to form a cold rolled sheet of 0.50 min in thickness, and thereafter the cold rolled sheet is subjected to a finish annealing at 970° C. for 10 seconds and coated with an insulating coating to obtain a non-oriented electrical steel sheet (product sheet).

(16) Test specimens with a length of 180 mm and a width of 10 mm are taken out from the thus obtained product sheet in L-direction and C-direction by punching set to a clearance of 5%, and then the amount of shear drop at edge face after punching is measured as Experiment 1 and the iron loss W.sub.15/50 is measured by Epstein test. Moreover, the iron loss of the test specimen with the width of 10 mm is measured by arranging three test specimens in the widthwise direction so as to provide a width of 30 mm.

(17) FIG. 4 shows an influence of Se content upon the ratio of amount of shear drop x to thickness t (x/t) and the iron loss W.sub.15/50, and FIG. 5 shows an influence of As content upon the ratio of amount of shear drop x to thickness t (x/t) and the iron loss W.sub.15/150, As seen from these figures, the size of shear drop can be made small by setting Se≧0.0001 mass % and As≧0.0005 mass %. This is considered due to the fact that since Se and As are grain boundary segregation type elements and have an effect of weakening the grain boundary strength, shear resistance is made small in punching to diminish the shear drop. On the other hand, it can be seen that the iron loss property is largely deteriorated at Se>0.0005 mass % and As>0.005 mass %. This is considered due to the fact that when great amounts of Sc and As are included, a great amount of precipitates is formed to increase hysteresis loss.

(18) From these results, Se of 0.0001˜0.0005 mass % and As of 0.0005˜0.005 mass % are added in the invention.

(19) <Experiment 3>

(20) Further, the inventors have made an experiment for investigating an influence of a crystal grain size upon the amount of shear drop.

(21) A steel slab containing C: 0.0020 mass %, Si: 2.5 mass %, Al: 0.001 mass %, Mn: 0.5 mass %, P: 0.01 mass %, N: 0.0019 mass %, S: 0.0024 mass %, Se: 0.0001 mass % and As: 0.0008 mass % is heated at 1100° C. for 30 minutes and hot rolled to form a hot rolled sheet of 2.0 mm in thickness, and the hot rolled sheet is subjected to a hot band annealing at 1000° C. for 30 seconds and cold rolled at once to form a cold rolled sheet of 0.35 mm in thickness, and thereafter the cold rolled sheet is subjected to a finish annealing by keeping various temperature of 750˜1100° C. for 10 seconds to obtain non-oriented electrical steel sheets (product sheets) having different crystal grain sizes.

(22) A test specimen with a length of 180 mm and a width of 30 mm and a test specimen with a length of 180 mm and a width of 10 mm are taken out from the thus obtained product sheet in L-direction and C-direction by punching set to a clearance of 5%, and then the amount of shear drop at edge face after punching is measured as Experiment 1 and the iron loss W.sub.15/50 is measured by Epstein test and the average crystal grain size of the product sheet at a section in the rolling direction (L-direction) is measured by linear intercept method. Moreover, the iron loss of the test specimen with the width of 10 mm is measured by arranging three test specimens in the widthwise direction so as to provide a width of 30 mm.

(23) FIG. 6(a) shows an influence of the crystal grain size upon the ratio of amount of shear drop x to thickness t (x/t). As seen from this figure, the amount of shear drop in punching can be decreased by setting the average crystal grain size to not more than 150 μm. This is considered due to the fact that as the crystal grain size becomes smaller, the abundance of grain boundary becomes higher and the shear resistance in punching becomes smaller. Also, FIG. 6(b) shows an influence of the crystal grain size upon the iron loss W.sub.15/50. As seen from this figure, the iron loss W.sub.15/50 is deteriorated when the average crystal grain size is not more than 30 μm. This is considered due to the fact that as the crystal grain size becomes smaller, hysteresis loss becomes large.

(24) It can be seen from the above that the average crystal grain size of the non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the invention is preferable to be a range of 30˜150 μm.

(25) The chemical composition of the non-oriented electrical steel sheet (product sheet) according to the invention will be described below.

(26) C: not more than 0.005 mass %

(27) When C content exceeds 0.005 mass %, there is a fear of causing the magnetic aging to deteriorate the iron loss. Therefore, C content is not more than 0.005 mass %.

(28) Si: 2˜7 mass %

(29) Si is an element effective for enhancing specific resistance of steel to reduce the iron loss. When it is less than 2 mass %, the above effect is small. While when it exceeds 7 mass %, steel is hardened and it is difficult to be produced by rolling. Therefore, Si content is in a range of 2˜7 mass %.

(30) Mn: 0.03˜3 mass %

(31) Mn is an element required for improving hot workability. When it is less than 0.03 mass %, the above effect is not sufficient, while when it exceeds 3 mass %, the increase of raw material cost is caused. Therefore, Mn content is in a range of 0.03˜3 mass %.

(32) Al: not more than 3 mass %

(33) Al is an element effective for enhancing specific resistance of steel to reduce the iron loss as Si. However, when it exceeds 3 mass %, steel is hardened and it is difficult to be produced by rolling. Therefore. Al content is not more than 3 mass %.

(34) P: not more than 0.2 mass %

(35) In the invention, P is added for enhancing specific resistance of steel to reduce the iron loss, but when it exceeds 0.2 mass %, embrittlement of steel becomes violent and breakage is caused in the cold rolling. Therefore, P content is restricted to not more than 0.2 mass %.

(36) S: not more than 0.005 mass %, N: not more than 0.005 mass %

(37) S and N are inevitable impurity elements. When each of them is added exceeding 0.005 mass %, the magnetic properties are deteriorated. Therefore, S and N are restricted to not more than 0.005 mass %, respectively.

(38) Se: 0.0001˜0.0005 mass %, As: 0.0005˜0.005 mass %

(39) Se and As are grain boundary segregation type elements as previously mentioned, and have an effect of weakening grain boundary strength to suppress the generation of shear drop in punching. The above effect is obtained by adding Se: not less than 0.0001 mass % and As: not less than 0.0005 mass %. While, when Se: more than 0.0005 mass % and As: more than 0.005 mass % are added, a great amount of precipitates is formed to increase hysteresis loss and deteriorate the iron loss property. Therefore, Se and As contents are Se: 0.0001˜0.0005 mass % and As: 0.0005˜0.005 mass %.

(40) In the non-oriented electrical steel sheet of the invention, the remainder other than the above ingredients is Fe and inevitable impurities. However, either one or both of Sn: 0.003˜0.5 mass % and Sb: 0.003˜0.5 mass % may be added for the purpose of improving the iron loss property.

(41) Sn and Sb are elements having such an effect that oxidation or nitriding of a surface layer of the steel sheet as well as formation of fine particles in the surface layer associated therewith are suppressed to prevent deterioration of the magnetic properties. In order to develop such an effect, each of them is preferable to be contained in an amount of not less than 0.003 mass %. While when it exceeds 0.5 mass %, the growth of crystal grains is obstructed and hence there is a fear of deteriorating the magnetic properties. Therefore, each of Sn and Sb is preferable to be added within a range of 0.003˜0.5 mass %.

(42) There will be described the production method of the non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the invention below.

(43) The production method of the non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the invention is preferable to comprise a series of steps of melting a steel having the aforementioned chemical composition adapted to the invention according to the usual refining process with a converter, an electric furnace, a vacuum degassing apparatus or the like, shaping into a steel slab by a continuous casting method or an ingot making-slabbing method, hot rolling the steel slab, subjecting to a hot band annealing if necessary, cold rolling, finish annealing and forming an insulation coating.

(44) In the above production method, conditions before the hot band annealing are not particularly limited, and the process can be performed under the usually known conditions.

(45) Also, the cold rolling may be a single cold rolling or two or more cold rollings with an intermediate annealing therebetween. Furthermore, the rolling reduction thereof may be same as the production condition in the usual non-oriented electrical steel sheet.

(46) Further, the finish annealing conditions are not particularly limited except that the average crystal grain size is set to in a preferable range of the invention (30˜150 μm), and this annealing may be performed according to the annealing conditions in the usual non-oriented electrical steel sheet. Moreover, in order to control the crystal grain size to in the above range, the annealing temperature is preferably in a range of 770˜1050° C., more preferably in a range of 800˜1020° C.

EXAMPLES

(47) A steel slab having a chemical composition shown in Table 1 is reheated at 1100° C. for 30 minutes and hot rolled to form a hot rolled sheet of 2.0 mm in thickness, and the hot rolled sheet is subjected to a hot band annealing at 1000° C. for 30 seconds and cold rolled at once to form a cold rolled sheet having a thickness shown in Table 2, and thereafter the cold roiled sheet is subjected to a finish annealing by keeping at a temperature also shown in Table 2 for 10 seconds to obtain a non-oriented electrical steel sheet (product sheet).

(48) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Chemical Composition (mass %) No. C Si Mn Al S N Se As P Sn Sb Remarks 1 0.0030 3.0 0.50 0.50  0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0007 0.010 tr. tr. Invention Example 2 0.0020 1.0 0.50 0.50  0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0007 0.010 tr. tr. Comparative Example 3 0.0030 2.5 0.50 0.001 0.0021 0.0021 0.0001 0.0010 0.010 tr. tr. Invention Example 4 0.0030 3.5 0.50 0.001 0.0021 0.0021 0.0001 0.0010 0.010 tr. tr. Invention Example 6 0.0030 4.5 0.50 0.001 0.0021 0.0021 0.0001 0.0018 0.010 tr. tr. Invention Example 5 0.0025 6.5 0.05 0.001 0.0024 0.0017 0.0001 0.0021 0.010 tr. tr. Invention Example 7 0.0030 7.5 0.05 0.001 0.0024 0.0017 0.0001 0.0021 0.010 tr. tr. Comparative Example 8 0.0030 2.0 0.05 0.30  0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0014 0.008 tr. tr. Invention Example 9 0.0030 2.2 0.05 1.0  0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0014 0.012 tr. tr. Invention Example 10 0.0025 2.0 0.50 1.5  0.0015 0.0021 0.0001 0.0020 0.010 tr. tr. Invention Example 11 0.0025 2.0 0.50 2.5  0.0015 0.0021 0.0001 0.0020 0.010 tr. tr. Invention Example 12 0.0025 2.0 0.50 4.0  0.0015 0.0021 0.0001 0.0020 0.010 tr. tr. Comparative Example 13 0.0030 3.0 0.05 0.001 0.0024 0.0027 0.0001 0.0015 0.010 tr. tr. Invention Example 14 0.0030 3.0 1.0  0.001 0.0024 0.0027 0.0001 0.0015 0.010 tr. tr. Invention Example 15 0.0030 2.5 1.5  0.001 0.0024 0.0027 0.0002 0.0018 0.010 tr. tr. Invention Example 16 0.0030 2.5 2.5  0.001 0.0024 0.0027 0.0003 0.0018 0.010 tr. tr. Invention Example 17 0.0030 2.2 4.0  0.001 0.0024 0.0027 0.0004 0.0024 0.010 tr. tr. Comparative Example 18 0.0040 3.0 0.50 0.50  0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0007 0.010 tr. tr. Invention Example 19 0.010  3.0 0.50 0.001 0.0020 0.0021 0.0001 0.0010 0.010 tr. tr. Comparative Example 20 0.0025 3.3 0.50 0.003 0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0015 0.005 tr. tr. Invention Example 21 0.0025 3.3 0.50 0.003 0.0018 0.0026 0.0005 0.0015 0.050 tr. tr. Invention Example 22 0.0025 3.3 0.50 0.003 0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0015 0.12  tr. tr. Invention Example 23 0.0025 3.3 0.50 0.003 0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0015 0.30  tr. tr. Comparative Example 24 0 0025 3.0 0.50 0.50  0.010  0.0026 0.0001 0.0015 0.01  tr. tr. Comparative Example 25 0.0025 3.0 0.50 0.50  0.003  0.012  0.0001 0.0018 0.01  tr. tr. Comparative Example 26 0.0030 3.0 0.50 0.001 0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0015 0.015 0.005 tr. Invention Example 27 0.0030 3.0 0.50 0.001 0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0015 0.015 0.050 tr. Invention Example 28 0.0030 3.0 0.50 0.001 0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0015 0.015 0.10  tr. Invention Example 29 0.0030 3.0 0.50 0.001 0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0015 0.015 0.30  tr. Invention Example 30 0.0030 3.0 0.50 0.001 0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0015 0.015 0.80  tr. Comparative Example 31 0.0030 3.0 0.50 0.50  0.0018 0.0029 0.0001 0.0015 0.010 tr. 0.80  Comparative Example 32 0.0030 3.0 0.50 0.001 0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0015 0.015 0.040 0.040 Invention Example 33 0.0020 2.5 0.05 0.001 0.0020 0.0025 0.0001 0.0025 0.010 0.050 tr. Invention Example 34 0.0035 3.0 0.50 0.50  0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0007 0.010 tr. tr. Invention Example 35 0.0035 3.0 0.50 0.50  0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0007 0.010 tr. tr. Comparative Example 36 0.0035 2.5 0.50 0.50  0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.0007 0.010 tr. tr. Comparative Example 37 0.0035 3.0 1.50 0.60  0.0022 0.0026 0.0001 0.0010 0.010 tr. tr. Invention Example 38 0.0030 3.0 0.50 0.50  0.0018 0.0026 0.0010 0.0010 0.010 tr. tr. Comparative Example 39 0.0030 3 0 0.50 0.50  0.0018 0.0026 0.0001 0.010  0.010 tr. tr. Comparative Example 40 0.0025 1.5 0.50 0.30  0.0020 0.0024  0.00003 0.0010 0.010 tr. tr. Comparative Example 41 0.0025 1.5 0.50 0.30  0.0019 0.0023 0.0001 0.0003 0.010 tr. tr. Comparative Example 42 0.0025 1.5 0.50 0.30  0.0024 0.0026  0.00004 0.0002 0.010 tr. tr. Comparative Example

(49) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Punchability Production Crystal Amount conditions grain of shear Iron Loss W.sub.15/50 Finish size of drop in Amount Iron Iron loss Iron loss Thickness annealing product punching of shear loss at loss at deterioration t temperature sheet x drop x/ 30 mm 10 mm rate No. (mm) (° C.) (μm) (mm) thickness t width width (%) Remarks 1 0.35 940 60 0.015 0.043 2.20 2.50 13.6 Invention Example 2 0.35 950 70 0.060 0.171 2.80 3.60 28.6 Comparative Example 3 0.30 950 70 0.015 0.050 2.50 2.90 16.0 Invention Example 4 0.25 930 55 0.015 0.060 2.00 2.27 13.5 Invention Example 5 0.50 950 70 0.025 0.050 2.20 2.41 9.5 Invention Example 6 0.15 950 70 0.010 0.067 1.80 1.95 8.3 Invention Example 7 It is impossible — — — — — Comparative Example to obtain a product because breakage is caused during the cold rolling 8 0.35 960 80 0.018 0.051 2.50 2.95 18.0 Invention Example 9 0.35 960 80 0.020 0.057 2.40 2.80 16.7 Invention Example 10 0.35 980 100  0.016 0.046 2.30 2.64 14.8 Invention Example 11 0.35 950 75 0.015 0.043 2.10 2.35 11.9 Invention Example 12 It is impossible — — — — — Comparative Example to obtain a product because breakage is caused during the cold rolling 13 0.30 950 70 0.016 0.053 2.40 2.80 16.7 Invention Example 14 0.25 910 40 0.014 0.056 2.20 2.55 15.9 Invention Example 15 0.25 930 50 0.014 0.056 2.10 2.40 14.3 Invention Example 16 0.20 950 70 0.012 0.060 2.05 2.30 12.2 Invention Example 17 0.50 980 100  0.080 0.160 2.80 3.80 35.7 Comparative Example 18 0.35 950 70 0.016 0.046 2.20 2.55 15.9 Invention Example 19 0.35 950 70 0.017 0.049 3.80 4.50 18.4 Comparative Example 20 0.35 980 100  0.025 0.071 2.30 2.75 19.6 Invention Example 21 0.35 960 85 0.022 0.063 2.20 2.60 18.2 Invention Example 22 0.35 950 70 0.020 0.057 2.15 2.45 14.0 Invention Example 23 It is impossible — — — — — Comparative Example to obtain a product because breakage is caused during the cold rolling 24 0.50 930 50 0.050 0.100 3.81 4.40 15.5 Comparative Example 25 0.50 930 50 0.050 0.100 3.85 4.40 14.3 Comparative Example 26 0.35 970 90 0.020 0.057 2.15 2.45 14.0 Invention Example 27 0.35 990 105  0.022 0.063 2.13 2.42 13.6 Invention Example 28 0.35 1020 120  0.025 0.071 2.12 2.41 13.7 Invention Example 29 0.35 1020 120  0.030 0.086 2.12 2.41 13.7 Invention Example 30 0.35 1000 100  0.025 0.071 3.80 4.52 18.9 Comparative Example 31 0.35 1000 100  0.025 0.071 3.90 4.59 17.7 Comparative Example 32 0.35 960 85 0.022 0.063 2.15 2.42 12.6 Invention Example 33 0.35 970 90 0.016 0.046 2.10 2.35 11.9 Invention Example 34 0.25 1000 110  0.013 0.052 2.00 2.25 12.5 Invention Example 35 0.50 750 20 0.025 0.050 3.70 4.05 9.5 Comparative Example 36 0.50 1100 200  0.045 0.090 2.90 3.75 29.3 Comparative Example 37 0.25 960 80 0.020 0.080 1.90 2.15 13.2 Invention Example 38 0.50 950 70 0.020 0.040 3.80 4.20 10.5 Comparative Example 39 0.50 940 60 0.020 0.040 3.85 4.25 10.4 Comparative Example 40 0.35 950 72 0.060 0.171 2.95 3.70 25.4 Comparative Example 41 0 35 960 82 0.065 0.186 2.85 3.75 31.6 Comparative Example 42 0.35 970 90 0.068 0.194 2.80 3.80 35.7 Comparative Example

(50) A sample with a length of 180 mm and a width of 30 mm and a sample with a length of 180 mm and a width of 10 mm are take out from the thus obtained product sheet in L-direction and C-direction by punching set to a clearance of 5%, and then iron loss W.sub.15/50 thereof is measured by Epstein test to determine an iron loss deterioration ratio. With respect to the sample with a length of 180 mm and a width of 10 mm, the measurement is conducted by arranging three samples with a width of 10 mm so as to provide a width of 30 mm as shown in FIG. 2. With respect to the product sheet, the amount of shear drop of the edge face after the punching is measured, and the average crystal grain size at a section in the rolling direction (L-direction) is measured by linear intercept method.

(51) The measured results are also shown in Table 2. As seen from Table 2, the non-oriented electrical steel sheets satisfying the conditions of the invention are excellent not only in the iron loss property before punching but also in the iron loss property after punching and can suppress the deterioration of the iron loss property by punching.