SEISMIC STEEL TUBULAR COLUMN WITH INTERNAL LOCAL RESTRAINT AND FILLED WITH HIGH STRENGTHEN COMPOUND CONCRETE CONTAINING NORMAL-STRENGTH DEMOLISHED CONCRETE LUMPS AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESS OF SUCH COLUMN
20170254083 · 2017-09-07
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
E04H9/021
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
C04B2201/52
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B2111/2053
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
E04C3/36
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
C04B28/02
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B28/02
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
E04C3/34
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
Y02W30/91
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
C04B28/02
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
E04C3/34
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
Abstract
A seismic steel tubular column with internal local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps, and a construction process. The seismic column includes a steel tube (1), high-strength fresh concrete (2), normal-strength demolished concrete lumps (3), horizontal stirrups (4), and longitudinal erection bars (5). The horizontal stirrups (4) are arranged at upper and lower ends inside the steel tube (1). The high-strength fresh concrete (2) is poured and the normal-strength demolished concrete lumps (3) are put alternately inside the steel tube (1). A compressive strength of the high-strength fresh concrete (2) is 30˜90 MPa greater than that of the normal-strength demolished concrete lumps (3).
Claims
1. A seismic steel tubular column with internal local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps, characterized in that: horizontal stirrups are provided at upper and lower ends inside a steel tube, with the steel tube having a circular or polygonal section; the horizontal stirrups corresponding to the circular section are uniformly arranged in one-seventh of a height range at the lower end of the steel tube and in one-seventh of a height range at the upper end of the steel tube respectively, while the horizontal stirrups corresponding to the polygonal section are uniformly arranged in one-fifth of a height range at the lower end of the steel tube and in one-fifth of a height range at the upper end of the steel tube respectively; high-strength fresh concrete is poured and normal-strength demolished concrete lumps are put alternately inside the steel tube, with a compressive strength of the high-strength fresh concrete being 30˜90 MPa greater than that of the normal-strength demolished concrete.
2. The seismic steel tubular column with internal local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps according to claim 1, wherein the normal-strength demolished concrete lumps are waste concrete lumps after demolishing old buildings, structures, roads, bridges or dams and removing protective layers and all or part of steel reinforcements.
3. The seismic steel tubular column with internal local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps according to claim 1, wherein the high-strength fresh concrete is a natural aggregate concrete or a recycled aggregate concrete, and has a compressive strength no less than 60 MPa.
4. The seismic steel tubular column with internal local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps according to claim 1, wherein the normal-strength demolished concrete lump has a characteristic size no less than 100 mm, and a mass ratio of the normal-strength demolished concrete lump and the high-strength fresh concrete is 1:4˜1:1.
5. A construction process of the seismic steel tubular column with internal local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps according to claim 1 characterized in that, it comprises following steps: (1) spot welding a plurality of horizontal stirrups and two longitudinal erection bars into one, then lifting the two longitudinal erection bars, uniformly arranging the plurality of horizontal stirrups in one-seventh of a height range at a lower end and in one-seventh of a height range at an upper end inside a steel tube respectively when the steel tube has a circular section, and uniformly arranging the plurality of horizontal stirrups in one-fifth of the height range at the lower end and in one-fifth of the height range at the upper end inside the steel tube respectively when the steel tube has a polygonal section, then spot welding the two longitudinal erection bars with an inner wall of the steel tube; (2) fully wetting normal-strength demolished concrete lumps in advance, when putting, pouring high-strength fresh concrete with about 20 mm thickness into a bottom of the steel tube first, then alternately putting wet normal-strength demolished concrete lumps and the high-strength fresh concrete inside the steel tube and fully vibrating until pouring is finished, so that the normal-strength demolished concrete lumps and the high-strength fresh concrete are uniformly mixed into one.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0021] The present invention is further described in detail below in combination with embodiments and accompanying drawings, but implementations of the present invention are not limited thereto.
Embodiment 1
[0022] See
[0023] A construction process of the above described seismic steel tubular column with internal local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps, which comprises following steps:
[0024] (1) spot welding 26 horizontal stirrups and two longitudinal erection bars into one, then lifting the two longitudinal erection bars, arranging 13 horizontal stirrups in one-seventh of a height range at a lower end inside a steel tube, and arranging the other 13 horizontal stirrups in one-seventh of a height range at an upper end, then spot welding the two longitudinal erection bars with an inner wall of the steel tube;
[0025] (2) fully wetting normal-strength demolished concrete lumps in advance, when putting, pouring high-strength fresh concrete with about 20 mm thickness into a bottom of the steel tube first, then alternately putting wet normal-strength demolished concrete lumps and the high-strength fresh concrete inside the steel tube and fully vibrating until pouring is finished, so that the normal-strength demolished concrete lumps and the high-strength fresh concrete are uniformly mixed into one.
[0026] A circular steel tube with an outer diameter of 300 mm, a wall thickness of 6 mm, a length of 3000 mm and same materials is taken at the same time, without arranging horizontal stirrup, to produce a steel tubular column without local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps. It is found that the seismic steel tubular column with internal local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps in the present embodiment has an ultimate displacement angle of about 5.2%, while steel tubular column without local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps has an ultimate displacement angle of about 4.4%, both of which fully meet the limitation requirements of current seismic codes about interlayer displacement angle of frame column. By calculating, it can be seen that amount of steel of these two columns is almost the same, but seismic performance of the former is about 18% higher than the latter.
Embodiment 2
[0027] See
[0028] A construction process of the above described seismic steel tubular column with internal local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps, which comprises following steps:
[0029] (1) spot welding 26 horizontal stirrups and two longitudinal erection bars into one, then lifting the two longitudinal erection bars, arranging 13 horizontal stirrups in one-seventh of a height range at a lower end inside a steel tube, and arranging the other 13 horizontal stirrups in one-seventh of a height range at an upper end, then spot welding the two longitudinal erection bars with an inner wall of the steel tube;
[0030] (2) fully wetting normal-strength demolished concrete lumps in advance, when putting, pouring high-strength fresh concrete with about 20 mm thickness into a bottom of the steel tube first, then alternately putting wet normal-strength demolished concrete lumps and the high-strength fresh concrete inside the steel tube and fully vibrating until pouring is finished, so that the normal-strength demolished concrete lumps and the high-strength fresh concrete are uniformly mixed into one.
[0031] A circular steel tube with an outer diameter of 300 mm, a wall thickness of 6 mm, a length of 3000 mm and same materials is taken at the same time, without arranging horizontal stirrup, to produce a steel tubular column without local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps. It is found that the seismic steel tubular column with internal local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps in the present embodiment has an ultimate displacement angle of about 5.0%, while the steel tubular column without local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps has an ultimate displacement angle of about 4.1%, both of which fully meet the limitation requirements of current seismic codes about interlayer displacement angle of frame column. By calculating, it can be seen that amount of steel of these two columns is almost the same, but seismic performance of the former is about 22% higher than the latter.
Embodiment 3
[0032] See
[0033] A construction process of the above described seismic steel tubular column with internal local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps, which comprises following steps:
[0034] (1) spot welding 26 horizontal stirrups and two longitudinal erection bars into one, then lilting the two longitudinal erection bars, arranging 13 horizontal stirrups in one-fifth of a height range at a lower end inside a steel tube, and arranging the other 13 horizontal stirrups in one-fifth of a height range at an upper end, then spot welding the two longitudinal erection bars with an inner wall of the steel tube;
[0035] (2) fully wetting normal-strength demolished concrete lumps in advance, when putting, pouring high-strength fresh concrete with about 20 mm thickness into a bottom of the steel tube first, then alternately putting wet normal-strength demolished concrete lumps and the high-strength fresh concrete inside the steel tube and fully vibrating until pouring is finished, so that the normal-strength demolished concrete lumps and the high-strength fresh concrete are uniformly mixed into one.
[0036] A rectangular steel tube with a side length of 300 mm, a wall thickness of 6 mm, a length of 3000 mm and same materials is taken, without arranging horizontal stirrup, to product a steel tubular column without local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps. It is found that the seismic steel tubular column with internal local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps in the present embodiment has an ultimate displacement angle of about 4.6%, while the steel tubular column without local restraint and filled with high strengthen compound concrete containing normal-strength demolished concrete lumps has an ultimate displacement angle of about 3.8%, both of which fully meet the limitation requirements of current seismic codes about interlayer displacement angle of frame column. By calculating, it can be seen that amount of steel of these two columns is almost the same, but seismic performance of the former is about 21% higher than the latter.
[0037] The above are preferred implementations of the present invention, but the implementations of the present invention are not limited by the above content. Any other changes, modifications, substitutions, combinations and simplifications that are not deviated from the spirit and principles of the present invention should be equivalent replacements, which are included within the scope of protection of the present invention.