Sulphur-Assisted Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU) Methods and Systems
20170252696 · 2017-09-07
Inventors
Cpc classification
Y02E60/36
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
Y02P20/50
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
C10G2/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
Disclosed herein is a system and method for sulphur-assisted carbon capture and utilization. The system includes a sulphur depolarized electrolyser (SDE) for receiving electricity, H.sub.2O and SO.sub.2 and for electrolysing the H.sub.2O and SO.sub.2 to produce hydrogen and sulphuric acid (H.sub.2SO.sub.4), a decomposition reactor for receiving and decomposing the H.sub.2SO.sub.4 into SO.sub.3 and H.sub.2O, wherein the H.sub.2O is recycled to the SDE, a sulphur submerged combustor for converting the SO.sub.3 to SO.sub.2 and producing S.sub.n vapor, a sulphur power plant for combusting S.sub.n vapor to produce SO.sub.2, electricity and heat and for supplying the SO.sub.2 and the electricity to the SDE and for supplying the heat to the decomposition reactor. The hydrogen is delivered to a carbon capture and utilization facility. An optional Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) regenerable system removes SO.sub.2 from flue gas, a CO.sub.2 converter generates COS, and a separator separates the COS from the flue gas.
Claims
1. A system for sulphur-assisted carbon capture and utilization, the system comprising: a sulphur depolarized electrolyser (SDE) for receiving electricity, H.sub.2O and SO.sub.2 and for electrolysing the H.sub.2O and SO.sub.2 to produce hydrogen and sulphuric acid (H.sub.2SO.sub.4); a decomposition reactor for receiving and decomposing the H.sub.2SO.sub.4 into SO.sub.3 and H.sub.2O, wherein the H.sub.2O is recycled to the SDE; a sulphur submerged combustor for converting the SO.sub.3 to SO.sub.2 and producing S.sub.n vapor; a sulphur power plant for combusting S.sub.n vapor to produce SO.sub.2, electricity and heat and for supplying the SO.sub.2 and the electricity to the SDE and for supplying the heat to the decomposition reactor; wherein the hydrogen is delivered to a carbon capture and utilization facility.
2. The system of claim 1 further comprising the carbon utilization facility which is configured to form fuel or chemicals by combining the hydrogen and carbon dioxide.
3. The system of claim 1 further comprising an evaporating reactor for concentrating the H.sub.2SO.sub.4 in addition to the decomposition reactor.
4. The system of claim 3 wherein the evaporating and decomposition reactors receive heat from a water-wall boiler.
5. The system of claim 4 wherein the water-wall boiler comprises a radiation zone and a catalytic reaction zone.
6. The system of claim 4 wherein the water-wall boiler receives S.sub.n and SO.sub.2 from a sulphur submerged combustor fed by recycled sulphur from a sulphur condenser.
7. The system of claim 1 wherein the carbon utilization facility that receives the hydrogen is an ammonia plant.
8. The system of claim 1 wherein the ammonia plant receives nitrogen from an air separation unit powered by a steam turbine that receives heat from a sulphuric acid plant.
9. The system of claim 1 further comprising a urea plant and wherein the ammonia plant supplies NH.sub.3 to the urea plant, wherein the urea plant also receives carbon dioxide from a power plant or industrial carbon-emitting facility.
10. The system of claim 1 further comprising a Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) regenerable system for receiving a flue gas from a power or industrial facility and for removing SO.sub.2 from the flue gas.
11. The system of claim 10 further comprising a CO.sub.2 converter downstream of the FGD regenerable system for receiving the flue gas from the FGD regenerable system and for receiving CS.sub.2 and for generating COS.
12. The system of claim 11 further comprising a separator downstream of the CO.sub.2 converter for separating the COS from the flue gas.
13. A method of sulphur-assisted carbon capture and utilization, the method comprising: receiving electricity, H.sub.2O and SO.sub.2 at a sulphur depolarized electrolyser (SDE); electrolysing the H.sub.2O and SO.sub.2 to produce hydrogen and sulphuric acid (H.sub.2SO.sub.4); receiving and decomposing the H.sub.2SO.sub.4 into SO.sub.3 and H.sub.2O; recycling the H.sub.2O to the SDE; converting using a sulphur submerged combustor the SO.sub.3 to SO.sub.2 and producing S.sub.n vapor; combusting S.sub.n vapor to produce SO.sub.2, electricity and heat; supplying the SO.sub.2 and the electricity to the SDE; supplying the heat to the decomposition reactor; delivering the hydrogen to a carbon capture and utilization facility.
14. The method of claim 13 further comprising, at the carbon capture and utilization facility, forming fuel or chemicals by combining the hydrogen and carbon dioxide.
15. The method of claim 14 further comprising concentrating the H.sub.2SO.sub.4 using an evaporating reactor.
16. The method of claim 15 comprising receiving heat at the evaporating and decomposition reactors from a water-wall boiler.
17. The method of claim 16 wherein the water-wall boiler comprises a radiation zone and a catalytic reaction zone.
18. The method of claim 16 comprising: receiving, by the water-wall boiler, sulphur vapour from a sulphur submerged combustor; and feeding the sulphur submerged combustor by recycling sulphur from a sulphur condenser.
19. The method of claim 13 comprising receiving the hydrogen at an ammonia plant.
20. The method of claim 13 comprising receiving nitrogen at the ammonia plant from an air separation unit powered by a steam turbine that receives heat from a sulphuric acid plant.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0039] Further features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in combination with the appended drawings, in which:
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
[0048] Disclosed below are exemplary embodiments of systems and methods for the sustainable generation of electric energy and hydrogen.
[0049] By way of overview,
[0050] Also by way of overview, the hydrogen thermochemical sulphur process (HTS) depicted in
[0051] Referring now to
[0052] As presented in
[0053] The current leading technique for separating carbon dioxide from post-combustion flue gas involves the use of a sorbent that will preferentially adsorb the carbon dioxide from the flue gas. Once the sorbent becomes saturated with carbon dioxide, it can be heated, which will cause the carbon dioxide to desorb at high purity. There are two possible adsorption mechanisms: physisorption, where the target molecules are attracted to the surface of pore walls within a high surface-area sorbent by van der Waals forces which leaves the chemical species of the adsorbate and surface intact, or chemisorption, where the target gas undergoes a covalent chemical reaction to bind to certain sites on the sorbent.
[0054] The problem with this approach is, in the case of amine-based post-combustion CO.sub.2 capture, that about 70% of the energy is expended during solvent regeneration for CO.sub.2 stripping. Therefore, the technique for separating carbon dioxide at system 20 from post-combustion flue gas of the embodiment of
[0055] The chemisorbed CO.sub.2 onto a surface of a solid catalyst forms strong bonds between adsorbate molecules and specific active sites of the catalyst surface which are sufficiently reactive to promote (catalyze) chemical reaction with gaseous or concurrently weakly chemisorbed carbon disulphide (CS.sub.2) to produce carbonyl sulphide (COS) that desorbs as a product from the surface of the catalyst. The reaction can be catalyzed by metal oxides such as alumina (gamma-Al.sub.2O.sub.3); however, according to Mink, the highly ionic lanthana (La.sub.2O.sub.3) and thoria (ThO.sub.2) exhibited peculiar acid-base properties and superior catalytic activity (G. Mink, Steady state activity of acidic, basic and amphoteric oxide in the CO.sub.2+CS.sub.2=2COS reaction, React. Kinet. CataL Lett., Vol. 68, No. 2, 221-227, 1999).
[0056] The uncondensed gases from conversion unit 20 composed primarily of carbon dioxide and carbonyl sulphide are introduced to a compressor operated at approximately 20 atm. The resulting compressed gases are subsequently transferred to a cooler where their temperature is reduced to about 0° C. The gas-liquid phase mixture produced in the cooler is withdrawn and transferred to a separator 22, where the carbonyl sulphide present in the product gases is removed therefrom through conduit 21 for the future handling as shown in
[0057] In comparison with the cited previous disclosure the implication of doing so is that the use of amine-based post-combustion system is eliminated and thus the complexity of the capture system, capital and operating cost and size of the plant are all reduced.
[0058] Very high heat energy is produced by the combustion of sulphur vapour in pure oxygen. The gaseous sulphur fuel comprises a combination of various sulfur allotropies with sulphur dioxide as a diluent. The sulfur allotropies S.sub.n and SO.sub.2 may be provided to the water-wall boiler by the submerged sulphur combustor 32.
[0059] Oxygen is sparged into a pool of molten sulphur at the appropriate temperature and immediately reacts to form sulphur dioxide. The heat of reaction causes the pool of sulphur to boil, but the temperature of the system is limited to the boiling point of sulphur at the operating pressure of the reactor. The amount of sulphur vaporised is such that the heat of vaporisation is exactly equal to the heat of reaction. Even at atmospheric pressure, the boiling point of sulphur (444.6° C.), is well above the auto ignition temperature (auto ignition of sulphur in air is 243° C.). This ensures immediate and complete reaction of the oxygen with sulphur as it enters the reactor. Accordingly, because oxygen is always the deficient reactant, there is no possibility of forming sulphur trioxide. Even if some transient SO.sub.3 is created, it would immediately react with the excess sulphur to form sulphur dioxide. Exemplary submerged sulphur combustors and related process are disclosed in U.K. Patent No. 1,560,524 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,204,082.
[0060] To overcome the temperature and pressure limitations associated with refractory linings, the water-wall boiler 34 is employed. The water-wall boiler is an advanced technology that is well proven, well known, established, and deployed at a very large scale in current industrial applications. The design of the water-wall boiler/reactor 34 is based on the modified Claus process WorleyParsons water-wall boiler capable of withstanding a bulk gas temperature of up to 2760° C. and disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,067,101. The water-wall boiler may produce saturated and/or superheated steam utilized by the steam turbine 38 for the power generation.
[0061] The water-wall boiler 34 has a radiant section, using water-wall tubes, capable of withstanding a very high gas temperature. In addition, the flame temperature can be controlled by different O.sub.2, S and SO.sub.2 mass ratios that can be pre-defined by the submerged combustion process parameters, such as pressure, temperature, and heat loss. Additionally, the composition of the mixture can be regulated by withdrawing part of the heat using special heat-exchangers located in the bubbling bed. Optionally, it also can be regulated by an enclosed additional chamber 32 loaded with inert material having high heat transfer coefficients in which the vapour-gas mixture, as it issues from the bubbling chamber 30, can react with the secondary oxygen delivery through conduit 19 for the further partial combustion of the sulphur vapour. The temperature of the combustion for the different O.sub.2, S and SO.sub.2 mass ratios can be provided through HSC reaction simulated program such as the one developed by Outokumpu as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,052,670.
[0062] A sufficient furnace volume is provided in the reaction/quench zone to achieve a desired level of completion of the SO.sub.2 and COS reaction. The products of the high-temperature homogeneous gas-phase reaction between COS and SO.sub.2 do not merely yield sulfur and CO.sub.2 but a significant amount of CO as well. In a non-stoichiometric operation, the excess reactant (COS or SO.sub.2) will also be present (Clark et al, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2001, 40 (2), 497-508).
[0063] Equally, to give insight into how fast the reaction between COS and SO.sub.2 can occur and how the various reaction products evolve as a function of reaction time, Applicant in a disclosure entitled “Methods and systems for sulphur combustion” published as CA 2,700,746, EP2203680, provided kinetic results of the simulation in COMSOL Reaction Engineering Laboratory software using the Leeds Sulphur Mechanism Version 5.2. The reaction conditions chosen for COS:SO.sub.2 feed ratios of 0.5:1, 1:1, and 2:1 respectively at a temperature of 1625 K (1351.85° C.) and pressure of 10 atm. The time axis has units of seconds.
[0064] The reaction is extremely rapid and the most significant species of the reaction are CO.sub.2, S.sub.2 and CO. The kinetic simulations also show that the reaction product distribution expectedly varies with time. However, an important insight gained from the simulation results is that, at a very early stage (<<100 ms), the primary product of the reaction is CO and S.sub.2 but, at longer times, the formation of CO.sub.2 occurs seemingly at the cost of CO consumption. The implication of this insight is that that the reaction product composition can, in principle, comprise primarily CO and S.sub.2 by controlling reaction times of interaction of these gases by rapid quenching.
[0065] Gases have a low heat capacity and thus such reaction conditions can be realized, and the resulting reaction product would be favorable thermodynamically at low temperatures for re-association of CO and sulphur to yield COS in the lower temperature re-association zone of the water-wall boiler 34 which contains a bed or series of beds of suitable catalyst.
[0066] There are several catalysts described in the patent literature for the process of producing carbonyl sulfide by reacting carbon monoxide with sulfur. West German Patent No. 1,222,024 discloses a technique to react carbon oxide with sulfur at relatively high temperature of 350° to 510° C., and U.S. Pat. No. 2,983,580 discloses the reaction of carbon monoxide at relatively low temperature of 260° to 483° C. in the presence of an aluminosilicate having a three dimensional structure. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 3,416,893 and U.K. Patent No. 957,102 discloses techniques to react carbon monoxide with sulfur in the presence of a sulfide having a metal selected from the group consisting of metals in the V, VI, VII and VIII groups of the periodic table, and Japanese Patent Publication No. 27632/1972 and U.S. Pat. No. 3,764,661 disclose techniques to react in the presence of an alkali metal sulfide such as sodium and potassium sulfides. Also, U.S. Pat. No. 4,078,045 discloses a technique for producing carbonate sulfide by reacting carbon monoxide with sulfur in the presence of an alkaline earth metal compound selected from the group consisting of calcium, strontium or barium sulfides sulfates and halides.
[0067] However, an extensive scientific literature search showed that the highly reactive and selective ferrous disulfide (FeS.sub.2) is the optimum catalyst for COS synthesis at a temperature of 360-450° C. During the seven years following its commercialization in 1981, the catalyst delivered consistently superb performance (Luo Dongshen, Abatement of Pollution in Process of Synthesizing Carbon Oxysulfide by Using a New Catalyst, Qinghai Provincial Institute of Environmental Science, Xin ing, 1989).
[0068] The resulting gaseous reaction products from a re-association zone of the water-wall boiler 34 are sent next through conduit 35 to condenser 36 where they are cooled to a temperature of about 150° C. to separate liquid sulphur via conduit 37. The uncondensed gases composed primarily of carbon dioxide, carbonyl sulphide together with a small amount of carbon monoxide are introduced to the compressor being operated at approximately 20 atm. The resulting compressed gases are next transferred to the cooler where their temperature is reduced to about 0° C. The gas-liquid phase mixture produced in the cooler is withdrawn and transferred to the separator 38, where the carbonyl sulphide present in the product gases is removed therefrom through conduit 33, heated and directed as a gas to the reaction zone of the water-wall boiler 34.
[0069] Under the temperature condition employed in the re-association zone of the water-wall boiler 34 only a small amount of carbon monoxide remains unconverted. Accordingly, under such circumstances it will generally be found uneconomical to separate the carbon dioxide from the gases by amine absorption or other such method merely for the purpose of recycling the comparatively small amount of unconverted carbon monoxide to the reaction/quench zone of the boiler-reactor 34. However, it may warrant the recycling of the gaseous mixture of CO.sub.2/CO effluent from the separator 38 through conduit 35 to the reaction/quench zone of the water-wall boiler 34 for the rapid quenching of the SO.sub.2/COS reaction gas products. It should be especially appreciated that the CO.sub.2/CO gas mixture from the separator 38 is already cooled to a temperature of about 0° C.
[0070] Referring still to
[0071] The thermochemical H.sub.2 generation process is performed according to the following reactions (1) (3) and is presented schematically in
SO.sub.2+2H.sub.2O.fwdarw.H.sub.2SO.sub.4+H.sub.2, electrolysis (25-100° C.) (1)
H.sub.2SO.sub.4.fwdarw.H.sub.2SO.sub.4.fwdarw.SO.sub.3+H.sub.2O T=350-450° C. (3)
The embodiment depicted in
2SO.sub.3+S.fwdarw.3SO.sub.2+heat ΔH=−99 kJ/mol (4)
[0072] As depicted in
[0073] The catalytic conversion of the SO.sub.2 to COS is well known in the literature as exemplified by U.S. Pat. No. 4,122,156. This reaction is promoted by a catalyst of the type containing a reducible metal oxide. Chromium promoted iron catalyst has been found to be effective in this application. Other metal promoted catalysts, however, may be used, including nickel-molybdenum, cobalt-molybdenum, molybdenum or any suitable combination thereof. The thermodynamics for this reaction are extremely favorable. As an approximation, the reaction can be carried out in the range of 200° to 500° C. Also of interest is the fact that the reaction is highly exothermic. A substantial quantity of heat must be removed from the reaction in order to control the temperature.
[0074] The reduction of SO.sub.2 by reacting with COS in the catalytic reaction zone of the second boiler 72 produces S and CO.sub.2 for delivery through conduit 73 to the sulphur condenser 36. As shown in
[0075] As shown in
[0076] As further depicted in
[0077] The basic process for converting solid coal to fuel gas in the form of carbon monoxide is well known. In fact, the “town gas,” used before the availability of natural gas, was produced by burning coal under a reducing atmosphere. Present day coal gasification processes involve the combustion of char or coke with oxygen to yield a combustible gas through the following reaction:
C+½O.sub.2.fwdarw.CO
[0078] Where the process uses oxygen instead of air, such extreme temperatures are generated that some steam addition is necessary to moderate the gasification temperature. With steam addition, a second consuming reaction occurs to reduce heat liberation and produce hydrogen and carbon monoxide.
[0079] Kertamus et al., U.S. Pat. No. 3,904,387, discloses a combustible fuel gas that is produced by heating solid char or coke whereby sulfur dioxide is used for the gasification stage and is enriched with oxygen. The process produces gaseous carbon monoxide and elemental sulphur.
[0080] It is important to note that the above described method of COS production can be used to produce carbon disulphide as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,090,818.
[0081]
[0082] As depicted in
[0083] As further depicted in
[0084] The embodiments of the present invention confer a number of significant advantages and technical effects which reduce or eliminate many of the disadvantages of the prior art.
[0085] In some embodiments, the HES energy system are envisioned as sulphur cycles which become sources of energy and hydrogen where most of the CO.sub.2 is recycled before it is used or sequestered.
[0086] In some embodiments, a solvent-based amine unit is not required to capture carbon dioxide from the flue gas. In some embodiments, CO.sub.2 capture/separation from an influent is achieved by passing the CO.sub.2-containing gas in intimate contact with carbon disulphide (CS.sub.2), as an alternative to amine solvent, in the presence of a catalyst that is capable of facilitating the separation by conversion of CO.sub.2 to COS.
[0087] Some embodiments of the present invention are directed to systems and methods in which the SO.sub.2 from flue gases can be captured through a Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) regenerable system producing concentrated SO.sub.2 using regenerable sorbents and then catalytically reducing to COS.
[0088] According to yet another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of a sulphur thermochemical water splitting process at significant lower temperatures and reduced in complexity due to direct coupling SO.sub.2-depolarized electrolyser (SDE) with Hybrid Energy System (HES) which will provides required thermal and electric energy and the same time enable curing out of the sulphur recycling.
[0089] Another aspect of the present invention is a method of generating COS by bringing petroleum coke into direct contact with heated gaseous sulfur dioxide to produce a gaseous mixture of carbon monoxide and elemental sulfur which is sequentially converted in the presence of a catalyst to carbonyl sulphide.
[0090] The present invention provides an innovative technique for efficiently sequestering carbon dioxide by converting the carbon dioxide to carbonyl sulphide for transport via a pipeline to a sequestration site where the carbon can be stored by injecting it as COS into the ground. Alternatively, carbon dioxide can be recovered from the COS and injected as carbon dioxide into the ground.
[0091] The present invention also provides innovative techniques for sulphur transport, storage and/or recovery. Sulphur-containing by-products of oil and gas production are converted to COS for transport and storage. COS can be transported at ambient temperatures through unheated pipelines without corrosion issues, thereby facilitating the transport of sulphur from extraction sites to market. Sulphur can be stored as COS rather than as elemental sulphur blocks which can be environmentally problematic. COS provides an efficient means to sequester large amounts of carbon while also storing sulphur in a desired location for future recovery. Sulphur can be recovered from the sulphur storage sites for combustion, manufacturing of sulphur-based products like sulphuric acid, or for transport to market. In other words, sulphur that is subsequently recovered from COS downstream of the pipeline may be combusted for energy generation, while the carbon dioxide obtained from recovering the sulphur from the COS can be separated and sequestered.
[0092] Thus, this invention provides a system and method for simultaneously conveying sulphur (S) and carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) to market, storage and/or sequestration sites by converting the sulphur and carbon dioxide into COS which is easier to transport via pipeline. In addition, the COS can be transported via ship, vessel, truck, train, or other transport or cargo vehicle capable of carrying a liquid or gas. In other words, this invention provides a process that takes carbon dioxide and sulphur (or sulphur compounds) and converts them to carbonyl sulphide (COS) which is easy, safe, and economical to transport as a liquid by pipeline, or any carrier, vessel or truck capable of transporting liquid.
[0093] Some embodiments of this invention may have particular utility for the oil sands or tar sands, specifically as a method of converting carbon dioxide and sulphur (or sulphur compounds) which are found in large quantities in the tar sands (or in sour oil and natural gas treatment plants) to carbonyl sulphide (COS).
[0094] This invention provides a method for utilization of carbon disulphide (CS.sub.2) produced by the utilization of petroleum coke, and in particular oil-sands fluid coke.
[0095] In some embodiments of the invention, the method entails generating energy by utilization of sulphur dioxide (SO.sub.2) that is generated by sulphur combustion and the utilization of oil-sands fluid coke to produce carbonyl sulphide (COS).
[0096] In some embodiments, the present invention further provides a method of sulphur recovery comprising the steps of (a) combusting sulphur to produce sulphur dioxide and heat energy; and (b) reacting the sulphur dioxide with carbonyl sulphide to produce elemental sulphur and carbon dioxide ready for sequestration. The heat energy produced by this process of sulphur recovery can be used for steam/power generation or, alternatively, for powering a sulphur-transport vessel or other vehicle carrying sulphur in the form of COS.
[0097] The present invention has been described in terms of specific embodiments, examples, implementations and configurations which are intended to be exemplary or illustrative only. Other variants, modifications, refinements and applications of this innovative technology will become readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art who have had the benefit of reading this disclosure. Such variants, modifications, refinements and applications fall within the ambit and scope of the present invention.