STATOR ASSEMBLY FLUX ALIGNMENT

Abstract

Various implementations include a stator assembly for an axial flux permanent magnet machine. The stator assembly may include a set of stator bars and a set of shoes for the stator bars. A shoe may be provided at one or each end of a stator bar. The stator assembly may further include a set of coils each wound around a respective stator bar. Each shoe has an inner surface adjacent to the end of one of the stator bars. The end of each stator bar has a rim, and each inner surface has a cut-away region over part of the rim to reduce a component of magnetic flux at the end of the stator bar.

Claims

1. A stator assembly for an axial flux permanent magnet machine, the stator assembly comprising: a set of stator bars; a set of shoes for the stator bars, each at an end of one of the stator bars; and a set of coils each wound around a respective stator bar; wherein each shoe has an inner surface adjacent to the end of one of the stator bars, the end of each stator bar having a rim, and each inner surface having a cut-away region over part of the rim to reduce a component of magnetic flux at the end of the stator bar.

2. The stator assembly of claim 1 wherein the stator bars are laminated stator bars, wherein the laminations are stacked in a stacking direction, and wherein the stacking direction is perpendicular to a direction between the shoes along the stator bars, and wherein each inner surface has a cut-away region over part of the rim to reduce the component of magnetic flux at the end of the stator bar in a direction parallel to the stacking direction.

3. The stator assembly of claim 1 wherein the cut-away region defines a channel in the inner surface.

4. The stator assembly of claim 1, wherein the cut-away region defines a step change in height of the inner surface.

5. The stator assembly of claim 1, wherein each inner surface of the set of shoes further comprises a second cut-away region over a second part of the rim of the stator bar.

6. The stator assembly of claim 5, wherein cut-away regions overlap with opposing parts of the rim of the stator bar.

7. The stator assembly of claim 1, wherein the set of shoes comprises a first set of shoes at a first end of each stator bar a second set of shoes at a second end of each of stator bars, wherein the first end and the second end are opposite ends of the stator bar.

8. The stator assembly of claim 1, wherein the inner surface of each shoe extends beyond the rim of the stator bar.

9. The stator assembly of claim 1, wherein an overlap between the cut-away region and the stator bar is at least about 1 mm.

10. The stator assembly of claim 1, wherein the cut-away region has at least one of (i) a width of about 2 mm and (ii) a depth of about 0.5 mm.

11. The stator assembly of claim 1, wherein the cut-away region extends to an edge of the inner surface of the shoe.

12. A method of controlling a direction of magnetic flux in a stator assembly for an axial flux permanent magnet machine, the stator assembly comprising: a set of stator bars; a set of shoes for the stator bars, each at an end of one of the stator bars wherein each shoe has an inner surface adjacent to the end of one of the stator bars; and a set of coils each wound around a respective stator bar; the method comprising shaping the inner surface of the shoes to control a direction of magnetic flux exiting the ends of the stator bars.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein the stator bars are laminated, wherein the laminations have a stacking direction, and wherein shaping the inner surface of the shoes to control the direction of magnetic flux exiting the ends of the stator bars comprises shaping the inner surface of the shoes to reduce a component of magnetic flux at the end of the stator bar in a direction parallel to the stacking direction.

14. A method of making an axial flux permanent magnet machine comprising determining a shape of the inner surface of the shoes of the machine according to claim 12, and making an axial flux permanent magnet machine with shoes of the determined shape.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0023] These and other aspects of the invention will now be further described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying figures in which:

[0024] FIGS. 1a to 1c show, respectively, a general configuration of a two-rotor one-stator axial flux machine, a general configuration of a two-stator one-rotor axial flux machine, and example topologies for axial flux permanent magnet machines.

[0025] FIGS. 2a and 2b show a schematic side view of a yokeless and segmented armature (YASA) machine, and a perspective view of the machine of FIG. 2a.

[0026] FIG. 3 shows a schematic of a laminated stator bar and stator shoes.

[0027] FIG. 4 shows a schematic of the laminated stator bar of FIG. 3 in the plane of lamination.

[0028] FIG. 5 shows a schematic of a prior art stator shoe.

[0029] FIGS. 6a and 6b show schematic views of stator shoes according to embodiments.

[0030] FIG. 7 is a plot showing the flux directions in the stator shoe of FIG. 5.

[0031] FIG. 8 is a plot showing the flux directions in the stator shoe according to an embodiment.

[0032] FIG. 9 shows a bar graph showing the volume integral of the squared radial flux in the stator bars an axial flux machine for various modifications to the shoe design.

[0033] Like elements are indicated by like reference numerals.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0034] FIGS. 2a and 2b, which are taken from WO2012/022974, show schematic illustrations of an example yokeless and segmented armature (PASA) machine 10. The machine 10 may function either as a motor or as a generator.

[0035] The machine 10 comprises a stator 12 and, in this example, two rotors 14a,b. The stator 12 comprises a collection of separate stator bars 16 spaced circumferentially about a machine axis 20, which also defines an axis of the rotors 14a,b. Each bar 16 carries a stator coil 22, and has an axis which is typically disposed parallel to the rotation axis 20. Each end 18a,b of the stator bar is provided with a shoe 27, which helps to confine coils of the stator coil 22 and may also spread the magnetic field generated by the stator coil. The stator coil 22 may be formed from square or rectangular section insulated wire so that a high fill factor can be achieved. In a motor the stator coils 22 are connected to an electrical circuit (not shown) that energizes the coils so that poles of the magnetic fields generated by currents flowing in the stator coils are opposite in adjacent stator coils 22.

[0036] The two rotors 14a,b carry permanent magnets 24a,b that face one another with the stator coil 22 between. When the stator bars are inclined (not as shown) the magnets are likewise inclined. Gaps 26a,b are present between respective shoe and magnet pairs 17/24a, 27/24b; these may be air gaps or coolant-filled. In an example motor the stator coils 22 are energized so that their polarity alternates to cause coils at different times to align with different magnet pairs, resulting in torque being applied between the rotor and the stator.

[0037] The rotors 14a,b are generally connected together, for example by a shaft (not shown), and rotate together about the machine axis 20 relative to the stator 12. In the illustrated example a magnetic circuit 30 is formed by two adjacent stator bars 16, two magnet pairs 24a,b, and two back plates 32a,b, one for each rotor, linking the flux between the backs of each magnet pair 24a,b facing away from the respective coils 22. The back plates 32a,b may be referred to as back irons and comprise a magnetic material, typically a ferromagnetic material although not necessarily iron. This magnetic material is not required to be a permanent magnet. The stator cons 16 are enclosed within a housing which defines a chamber for the rotors and stator, and which may be supplied with a cooling medium.

[0038] The stator bars of a stator may be formed from laminated stacks. That is to say, each stator bar may comprise a series of layers or laminations stacked atop one another.

[0039] FIG. 3 shows a bar-shoe assembly 300 comprising such a laminated stator bar 302 and shoes 304. Stator bar 302 comprises a series of laminations 306 stacked in a horizontal lamination stacking direction 308. However, it will be understood that bar 302 may more generally be formed from laminations 306 stacked in any direction. While embodiments below are described with reference to laminations stacked perpendicularly to the separation between the end shoes and some component of an arbitrary flux travelling parallel to this stacking direction (i.e. horizontally right to left in FIG. 3), it will be understood that the described techniques may be applied more generally to laminations stacked in any direction with at least a component of flux travelling parallel to the lamination stacking direction.

[0040] The layered structure of laminated stator bars (such as stator bar 302) limit the ability of eddy currents to travel in a single direction, the direction in which the laminations are stacked (e.g. stacking direction 308). However, components of fluxes travelling parallel to the direction in which the laminations are stacked can induce eddy currents in the plane perpendicular to the direction in which laminations are stacked. As such, flux components 310 parallel to the direction in which lamination stacking direction 308 induces eddy currents in the plane of the lamination layers 306.

[0041] FIG. 4 shows a laminated stator bar 302 of FIG. 3 in the plane of lamination 402. Eddy currents 404 in this plane are induced by components of fluxes travelling parallel to the lamination stacking direction. The eddy currents in the plane of lamination may result in resistive losses and lower efficiencies. The square of the total flux travelling in the direction parallel to the lamination stacking direction in a bar gives an indication of the total eddy currents, j, in the same bar. For a bar laminated as shown in FIG. 3 this corresponds to the radial flux, B.sub.r. Therefore:

∫jdV∝∫B.sub.r.sup.2dV  (1)

[0042] The resistive instantaneous power losses, P, due to the eddy currents in such a bar are therefore equal to the volume integral of the squared radial flux:

[00001]$\begin{array}{cc}P=\frac{1}{\sigma }\int {.Math.j.Math.}^2\mathrm{dV}.& \left(2\right)\end{array}$

where σ is the conductivity of the material of the laminations and the integral is over volume elements dV. As such, it is advantageous to minimise the eddy currents 404 in the plane of lamination 502 in order to minimise resistive power losses.

[0043] FIG. 5 shows a schematic plan view of a typical end shoe 500 for use in a bar-shoe assembly. FIGS. 6a and 6b show example shoes 600 and 610 according to embodiments. Each of FIGS. 5, 6a and 6b show an inner surface or inner face of a stator shoe that, when assembled, is positioned adjacent to an end of a stator bar. Compared to shoe 500, shoes 600 and 610 include cut-away regions 602, 604, 612 and 614. It will be understood that the phrase “cut-away region” does not imply a method of construction, nor should it be construed as a limitation to a specific method of forming such cut-away regions. Instead, a cut-away region merely refers to an area of a surface of the shoe with a different height relative to the remainder of the inner surface of the shoe. For example, cut-away portions 602, 604, 612 and 614 may each comprise a channel, a notch, groove, trench, step or any other similar formation, and it will be understood that these formations may be formed by any method familiar to a person skilled in the art. It will be further understood that while cut-away portions 602, 604, 612 and 614 shown in FIGS. 6a and 6b are optimised for a stator bar laminated as shown in FIG. 3, shoes 600 and 610 and their respective cutaway regions may be shaped generally to reduce the components of fluxes for any lamination stacking direction. The precise shape and nature of the cut-away portions will vary dependent on the direction in which the laminations are stacked in the bar in order to reduce the flux components parallel to the direction in which the laminations are stacked.

[0044] Cut-away regions 602 and 604 each form a channel or notch that approximately traces the perimeter of the shoe 600. In a non-limiting example, these channels may each be approximately 2 mm wide and approximately 0.5 mm deep. More generally, each channel may be between 0.5 mm and 10 mm wide and between 0.1 mm and 2 mm deep. When assembled, the channels may fully or partially overlap with the stator bar. In another non-limiting example, each channel may have an approximately 1 mm overlap with the stator bar when assembled. More generally, the overlap between each cut-away region and the stator bar may be between 0.1 mm and the full width of the cut-away region. It will be understood that cut-away regions 602 and 604 may each have different widths, depths and/or overlaps with the stator bar, or alternatively that stator shoe 600 may include only one cut-away region.

[0045] In a further embodiment cut-away regions 612 and 614 of FIG. 6b extend to the perimeter or edge of the inner surface of the stator shoe 610. As with cut-away regions 602 and 604, when assembled into a shoe-bar assembly, cut-away portions 612 and 614 may fully or partially overlap with the stator bar. In principle in some implementations the inner surface of shoes 600 and 610 may be approximately equal in shape, and optionally area, to the adjacent end of the stator bar. For example the inner surface may have substantially no overhang (i.e. it may not extend beyond a rim of the stator bar) at the radially inner or outer edge of the shoe, or both, or neither. The inner surface may, but need not, overlap the stator bar at circumferential edges of the shoe. It will be appreciated that even though one or more edges of the shoe may align with one or more edges of the stator bar there may still be a cutaway portion as described. In some implementations the shoe may have a feature which is effectively an extension of the stator bar i.e. the cut-away portions 612 and 614 may have edges which align with an edge or rim defined by the end of the stator bar bearing the shoe.

[0046] FIG. 7 shows a plot 700 of the direction of flux lines in a cross section of a bar-shoe assembly comprising a shoe with no cut-away region, for example bar-shoe assembly 300 of FIG. 3. The plot shows the direction of flux lines in a laminated stator bar 702 and a stator shoe 704. The Y-axis shows a height Z of the assembly (corresponding to dimension Y of FIG. 3) while the X-axis shows a width R of the assembly (corresponding to dimension X of FIG. 3), both in units of mm. In this example, the lamination stacking direction is along the X-axis (i.e. horizontally). The stippled area indicates a region of highest intensity of the flux component travelling parallel to the direction in which laminations are stacked in units of Teslas per mm.sup.2 (horizontal in the figure). In general, shoe 704 has a greater intensity of flux in the stacking direction. However, as the shoe 704 is a non-laminated component the losses due to this flux component are lower relative to stator bar 702, As a result, a relatively large proportion of the resistive losses of the system result from the components of horizontal flux at point 706 of stator bar 702.

[0047] FIG. 8 shows a plot 800 of the direction of flux lines in a cross section of a bar-shoe assembly. The X and Y axis of FIG. 8 are the same as FIG. 7; the stippled area indicates a region of relatively higher horizontal flux component. Stator bar 802 may be, for example, the same stator bar as shown in FIG. 7. However, stator shoe 804 comprises a cut-away region 808. In this example, cut-away region 808 comprises a channel with a width (R) of 2 mm and a depth (Z) of 0.5 mm. The cut-away region 808 also comprises a 1 mm overlap with stator bar 802. As shown in FIG. 8, the intensity of the flux travelling parallel to the lamination stacking direction (i.e. the X-axis in this example) at point 806 of stator bar 802 is significantly reduced compared to point 706 of stator bar 702 shown in FIG. 7.

[0048] Utilising equation (2) above, and by comparing the integrated radial fluxes of FIGS. 7 and 8, it is possible to calculate a conservative estimate for the restive power losses shown in plots 700 and 800.

[0049] FIG. 9 indicates a comparison of these losses in which the y-axis, in units of Tesla.sup.2, shows a proxy for resistive power loss. Specifically, FIG. 9 shows a comparison between a proxy for the resistive losses 902 in a baseline shoe-bar assembly with no cut-away region, and a proxy for the resistive losses 904 in a shoe-bar assembly with a 2 mm wide, 0.5 mm deep cut-away region that has a 1 mm overlap with the stator bar. As can be seen in FIG. 9, shoes designed as described herein can reduce the resistive losses in a shoe bar assembly by over 75% as compared to a baseline value.

[0050] No doubt many other effective alternatives will occur to the skilled person. It will be understood that the invention is not limited to the described embodiments and encompasses modifications apparent to those skilled in the art lying within the scope of the claims appended hereto.