SYSTEMS AND METHODS ASSOCIATED WITH HYBRID FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE (FOWT) PLATFORM AND SYNTACTIC BUOYANCY MATERIAL USED FOR THE PERIMETER COLUMNS
20220234698 · 2022-07-28
Inventors
Cpc classification
F03D13/25
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B63B2005/245
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F05B2240/95
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B63B1/107
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B63B35/44
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B63B2035/446
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F05B2240/93
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B63B21/20
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B63B39/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B63B21/20
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B63B35/44
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A hybrid floating offshore wind turbine energy conversion system using light weight solid syntactic buoyancy material columns for offshore application. Each wind turbine includes a deep draft Spar hull combined with several semi-submersible syntactic columns for extra buoyancy and stabilization.
Claims
1. A buoyancy control system for an offshore wind turbine comprising: a structural steel core; a syntactic layer configured to be positioned around the structural steel core; buoyancy material embedded within the syntactic layer, wherein the structural steel core, syntactic layer and buoyancy module form a column having a density that is ten to twenty percent of water.
2. The buoyancy control system of claim 1, wherein the syntactic layer is round or squared in shape.
3. The buoyancy control system of claim 1, further comprising: a spar hull, wherein the syntactic layer is directly coupled to the spar hull through pontoons and bracings.
4. The buoyancy control system of claim 3, further comprising: a plurality of columns, wherein the positioning of each of the plurality of columns is based on overturning movement caused by the offshore wind turbine.
5. The buoyancy control system of claim 4, wherein the overturning movement caused by the offshore wind turbine is based on a dominate wind direction.
6. The buoyancy control system of claim 5, wherein the positioning of the the plurality of columns is configured to reduce inertia radius of gyration.
7. The buoyancy control system of claim 3, wherein the spar hull includes two or more telescoping sections, wherein a first of the telescoping sections is configured to be lowered to extend a draft of the spar hull and move a solid ballast to lower a center of gravity of the buoyancy control system.
8. The buoyancy control system of claim 7, wherein the solid ballast is configured to be retracting during construction, installation, and decommissioning.
9. The buoyancy control system of claim 7, wherein the spar hill is a double hull structure configured to control flood damage.
10. The buoyancy control system of claim 7, further comprising: a heave plate coupled to a bottom of the spar hull, the heave plate being configured to provide additional vertical hydrodynamic damping and ballast.
11. The buoyancy control system of claim 3, further comprising: Horizontal beams positioned between adjacent columns below a water surface.
12. The buoyancy control system of claim 3, wherein a diameter of the spar hull is greater than or equal to a turbine tower diameter, the turbine tower being a support for the offshore wind turbine.
13. The buoyancy control system of claim 3, further comprising: mooring lines connected to the spar hull to reduce mooring line dynamics and a load on the plurality columns.
14. The buoyancy control system of claim 13, wherein the mooring lines are chain braced to adjacent columns to reduce yaw motion of a platform of the offshore wind turbine and to reduce clearance between the mooring lines and the platform.
15. The buoyancy control system of claim 3, further comprising: syntactic buoyancy modules coupled to the spar hull to provide extra buoyancy and stability during transit and maintenance.
16. The buoyancy control system of claim 1, wherein the syntactic layer includes a plurality of syntactic buoyancy foams that are coupled to the structural steel core and adjacent syntactic buoyancy foams.
17. The buoyancy control system of claim 1, wherein the buoyancy material is formed with large numbers and sizes of light weight spheres, tubes, cubes, or cellular structures that are made of plastic, composite, foam, or voids, which are molded together using epoxy or cementing materials.
18. The buoyancy control system of claim 17, wherein the buoyancy material is configured to withhold hydrostatic pressure and wave load.
19. The buoyancy control system of claim 1, wherein the structural steel cores are stabilized with bracings to transfer a buoyancy force provided by the syntactic layer to support and stabilize the offshore wind turbine.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0017] Non-limiting and non-exhaustive embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the following figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the various views unless otherwise specified.
[0018]
[0019]
[0020] Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding components throughout the several views of the drawings. Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help improve understanding of various embodiments of the present disclosure. Also, common but well-understood elements that are useful or necessary in a commercially feasible embodiment are often not depicted in order to facilitate a less obstructed view of these various embodiments of the present disclosure.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0021] In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one having ordinary skill in the art that the specific detail need not be employed to practice the present invention. In other instances, well-known materials or methods have not been described in detail in order to avoid obscuring the present invention.
[0022]
[0023] Column 100 may include a steel structural core 110 and syntactic material 120 with embedded buoyancy material 130.
[0024] Steel structural core 110 may be a steel structural member, which may be encompassed by syntactic material 120.
[0025] Syntactic material 120 may be formed in a plurality of parts that are coupled together and to steel structural core 110. Syntactic material 120 may be a foam that can create any shaped column 100, such as a rectangular, cylindrical, etc. Syntactic material 120 may have embedded buoyancy material 130. Buoyancy material 130 may include a large number of objects of various sizes and shapes, such as light weight spheres, tubes, cubes, or cellular structures. These objects may be formed of plastic, composite, foam, or voids, which are molded together using epoxy or cementing materials. In embodiments, the objects may have hollow internal chambers that may reduce the density of column 100.
[0026]
[0027] Below platform 200 on the bottom of the spar hull may be a heave plate or tank 220. Heave plate or tank 220 may be configured to provide additional vertical hydrodynamic dampening and/or ballast.
[0028] The upper surfaces of each of the columns 100 may be coupled to the Spar hull via beams 315, and the adjacent columns 100 via beams 310. This may provide additional stability of load transference across platform 200.
[0029] The lower surfaces of each of the columns 100 may include a beam or pontoon 320 coupled to the Spar hull. Furthermore, each of the columns may have an angled beam 410 coupled to the spar hull. A first end of each of the beams 410 may be positioned at a design location of the column for stress consideration and extend at an angle towards the Spar hull.
[0030] Mooring lines 330 can be connected to the Spar hull to reduce the mooring line dynamics and the load on the columns 100. Each of the mooring lines 330 can be chain braced to the adjacent pontoons or columns to reduce yaw motion of the platform 200 and to help the clearance between mooring lines 330 and the platform 200.
[0031] Table 1 depicted below shows general design characteristics of a hybrid FOWT platform 200.
TABLE-US-00001 Turbine power rating (MW) 2 5 8 10 15 Rotor diameter typical (m) 72 112 130 178 240 Gap/deck clearance [calculated] 34 29 25 21 15 Hub Height (m) from deck level 70 85 90 110 135 Tower base (Spar) diameter (m) 4 6 7 8 10 Column foam diameter (m) 3 4 4 5 6 Number of Foam Columns 3 3 3 3 or 4 4 or 5 Spar draft (m) - estimated 30-40 30-50 35-50 40-50 50-60 [30] [40] [45] [50] [60] Column draft (m) 15 20 20 25 30 Free board (m) 9 15 15 15 15 Spar center to Column center (m) 14 16 18 20 25 Number of chain mooring 3 3 3 3 or 4 4 or 5
[0032] Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, “one example” or “an example” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment or example is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment”, “in an embodiment”, “one example” or “an example” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the particular features, structures or characteristics may be combined in any suitable combinations and/or sub-combinations in one or more embodiments or examples. In addition, it is appreciated that the figures provided herewith are for explanation purposes to persons ordinarily skilled in the art and that the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale.
[0033] Although the present technology has been described in detail for the purpose of illustration based on what is currently considered to be the most practical and preferred implementations, it is to be understood that such detail is solely for that purpose and that the technology is not limited to the disclosed implementations, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover modifications and equivalent arrangements that are within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, it is to be understood that the present technology contemplates that, to the extent possible, one or more features of any implementation can be combined with one or more features of any other implementation.