NANOPARTICLES AND USES THEREOF

Abstract

The present invention relates to a nanoparticle comprising a polymer, α-Galactosylceramide (α-GalCer) and chitosan. The invention also relates to multivalent immunogenic compositions. The invention has particular use as a pulmonary vaccine.

Claims

1. A nanoparticle comprising a polymer, α-Galactosylceramide (α-GalCer) and chitosan.

2. The nanoparticle as claimed in claim 1, wherein the polymer comprises a synthetic polymer, and optionally, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA).

3. The nanoparticle as claimed in either claim 1 or 2, wherein the chitosan comprises a water soluble chitosan, and optionally, a chitosan hydrochloride, or a non-animal source chitosan.

4. The nanoparticle as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the nanoparticle further comprises an antigen.

5. The nanoparticle as claimed in claim 4, wherein the antigen is absorbed on, or conjugated to, a surface of the nanoparticle.

6. The nanoparticle as claimed in claim 5, wherein the antigen is absorbed on to the surface of the nanoparticle by van der waals or electrostatic interaction.

7. The nanoparticle as claimed in any of claims 4 to 6, wherein the antigen is selected from one or more of the following: proteins derived from S. pneumoniae; pneumococcal surface protein A (PspA) and/or pneumolysin (PdT); and derivatives.

8. The nanoparticle as claimed in claim 7, wherein the PspA is recombinant and/or PdT is a detoxified derivative.

9. The nanoparticle as claimed in any preceding claim, in a dry powder format suitable for inhalation.

10. The nanoparticle as claimed in claim 9, wherein the dry powder format is produced by spray drying the nanoparticles.

11. The nanoparticle as claimed in either claim 9 or 10, wherein the nanoparticles are combined with one or more excipients.

12. The nanoparticle as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8, in a buffered or saline solution or for mixing with a buffered or saline solution.

13. The nanoparticle as claimed in any preceding claim, for initiating an immune response.

14. The nanoparticle as claimed in claim 13, wherein the immune response comprises a systemic and/or local immune response.

15. The nanoparticle as claimed in any preceding claim, for use in the delivery and/or presentation of an antigen.

16. The nanoparticle as claimed in any preceding claim, for use as a medicament.

17. The nanoparticle as claimed in any preceding claim, for use as a medicament formulated for delivery to and/or through mucosa.

18. The nanoparticle as claimed in claim 17, wherein the mucosa is lung mucosa.

19. The nanoparticle as claimed in any one of claims 16 to 18, wherein the medicament is a vaccine.

20. The nanoparticle as claimed in claim 19, wherein the vaccine is a pulmonary vaccine.

21. The nanoparticle as claimed in any one of claims 16 to 18, wherein the medicament is an adjuvant medicament.

22. The nanoparticle as claimed in any preceding claim, for use in the prevention, management, amelioration or treatment of pneumococcal disease or infection.

23. The nanoparticle as claimed in claim 22, wherein the pneumococcal disease comprises pneumonia.

24. The nanoparticle as claimed in any preceding claim, for use as an adjuvant.

25. A multivalent immunogenic composition comprising: a) a nanoparticle comprising a polymer, α-Galactosylceramide (α-GalCer) and chitosan; and b) a plurality of capsular polysaccharides from Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes absorbed on, or conjugated to, a surface of the nanoparticle.

26. The composition as claimed in claim 25, wherein the capsular polysaccharides are selected from one or more of the Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes: 1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F and 23F.

27. The composition as claimed in claim 25 or 26, for use as a medicament.

28. The composition as claimed in claim 27, for use as a medicament formulated for delivery to and/or through mucosa.

29. The composition as claimed in claim 28, wherein the mucosa is lung mucosa.

30. The composition as claimed in any one of claims 27 to 29, wherein the medicament is a vaccine.

31. The composition as claimed in claim 30, wherein the vaccine is a pulmonary vaccine.

32. The composition as claimed in any one of claims 27 to 31, wherein the medicament is an adjuvant medicament.

33. The composition as claimed in any preceding claim, for use in the prevention, management, amelioration or treatment of pneumococcal disease or infection.

34. The composition as claimed in claim 33, wherein the pneumococcal disease comprises pneumonia.

35. A method of producing a nanoparticle for the delivery and/or presentation of one or more antigens, the method comprising: a) forming an oil-in-water emulsion of a polymer and α-Galactosylceramide (α-GalCer) in an organic solvent and agitating the emulsion; b) mixing the emulsion with an aqueous phase containing chitosan so as to form a mixture and removing the organic solvent from the mixture so as to form a nanoparticle suspension; c) removing any unbound α-Galactosylceramide (α-GalCer) and/or chitosan from the nanoparticle suspension; d) absorbing or conjugating the one or more antigens on to the nanoparticles; and optionally separating the nanoparticles which have absorbed or conjugated antigens present.

36. The method as claimed in claim 35, wherein the method further comprises: e) drying the nanoparticles.

37. The method as claimed in claim 36, wherein e) comprises spray drying, and optionally comprises spray drying the nanoparticles together with one or more excipients.

38. The method as claimed in any one of claims 35 to 37, wherein the oil-in water emulsion in a) further comprises polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and optionally, the PVA is removed in b).

39. The method as claimed in to any one of claims 35 to 38, wherein the agitation in a) is by sonification.

40. The method as claimed in any one of claims 35 to 39, wherein the nanoparticles are formed having a diameter in the range of 100 to 500 nm.

41. The method as claimed in any one of claims 36 to 39, wherein the nanoparticles are embedded within microcarrier formed by spray drying and form particles having a diameter in the range of 1 to 5 μm.

42. The method as claimed in any one of claims 35 to 41, wherein the polymer comprises poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA).

43. The method as claimed in any one of claims 35 to 42, wherein the chitosan comprises chitosan hydrochloride or a non-animal source chitosan.

44. The method as claimed in any one of claims 35 to 43, wherein the one or more antigens are absorbed on to the surface of the nanoparticle by van der waals or electrostatic interaction.

45. The method as claimed in any one of claims 35 to 44, wherein the one or more antigens are selected from one or more of the following: pneumococcal surface protein A (PspA) and/or pneumolysin (PdT) and/or derivatives thereof.

46. The method as claims in claim 45, wherein the PspA is recombinant and/or PdT is a detoxified derivative.

47. The method as claimed in any one of claims 35 to 44, wherein the one or more antigens comprise a plurality of capsular polysaccharides from Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes.

48. The method as claims in claim 47, wherein the capsular polysaccharides are selected from one or more of the Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes: 1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F and 23F.

49. The method as claimed in anyone of claims 35 to 48 for the production of a nanoparticle as claimed in anyone of claims 1 to 24 or a multivalent immunogenic composition as claims in any one of claims 25 to 34.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0055] Embodiments of the invention are described below, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying figures in which:

[0056] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the nanocarrier system of the present invention and the proposed use as an inhalable vaccine for pneumonia;

[0057] FIG. 2 is a graph showing the size distribution intensity of PLGA (reference) nanoparticles formed without PspA (the data represented is a single run);

[0058] FIG. 3 is a graph showing the size distribution intensity of PLGA (ester) nanoparticles formed without PspA (the data represented is a single run);

[0059] FIG. 4 is a graph showing the size distribution intensity of PLGA (HMW) nanoparticles formed without PspA(the data represented is a single run);

[0060] FIG. 5 is a graph showing the size distribution intensity of PLGA (75:25) nanoparticles formed without PspA (the data represented is a single run);

[0061] FIG. 6 is a graph showing the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 7AAD when the nanoparticles were incubated with JAWS II cells;

[0062] FIG. 7 is a graph showing the percentage of 7AAD negative cells when the nanoparticles were incubated with JAWS II cells;

[0063] FIG. 8 are graphs showing the median fluorescence intensity (MEI) when the nanoparticles were incubated with JAWS II cells and stained for A. CD40 and B. CD86 respectively;

[0064] FIG. 9 is a graph showing the size distribution intensity of PLGA (ref) nanoparticles formed without PspA or chitosan (HCl);

[0065] FIG. 10 is a graph showing the size distribution intensity of PLGA (ref) nanoparticles formed with chitosan (HCl) and no PspA;

[0066] FIG. 11 is a graph showing the size distribution intensity of PLGA (ref) nanoparticles formed with PspA and no chitosan;

[0067] FIG. 12 is a graph showing the size distribution intensity of PLGA (ref) nanoparticles formed with chitosan (HCl) and PspA;

[0068] FIG. 13 is a graph showing the size distribution intensity of PLGA (75:25) nanoparticles formed with no PspA and no chitosan;

[0069] FIG. 14 is a graph showing the size distribution intensity of PLGA (75:25) nanoparticles formed with chitosan (HCl) and no PspA;

[0070] FIG. 15 is a graph showing the size distribution intensity of PLGA (75:25) nanoparticles formed with PspA and no chitosan;

[0071] FIG. 16 is a graph showing the size distribution intensity of PLGA (75:25) nanoparticles formed with chitosan (HCl) and PspA;

[0072] FIG. 17 are graphs showing the results of when PLGA (ref) nanoparticle formulations with PspA were incubated with JAWS II cells at a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL for 24 hours, and stained with 7AAD to determine the toxicity of the formulations, where A. shows the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the 7AAD and B. shows the percentage of 7AAD negative cells;

[0073] FIG. 18 are graphs showing the results of when PLGA (75:25) nanoparticle formulations with PspA were incubated with JAWS II cells at a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL for 24 hours, and stained with 7AAD to determine the toxicity of the formulations, where A. shows the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the 7AAD and B. shows the percentage of 7AAD negative cells;

[0074] FIG. 19 are graphs showing the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) when Ref+chitosan with PspA nanoparticles were incubated with JAWS II cells and stained for A. CD40 and B. CD86 respectively so as to determine the immunogenicity of each polymer nanoparticle;

[0075] FIG. 20 are graphs showing the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) when 75:25+chitosan with PspA nanoparticles were incubated with JAWS II cells and stained for A. CD40 and B. CD86 respectively so as to determine the immunogenicity of each polymer nanoparticle;

[0076] FIG. 21 is a graph showing splenocytes proliferation were splenocytes were stained with CFSE and the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) measured;

[0077] FIG. 22 are graphs showing the cytokine (IL-10, IL-17A, TNF, IFN-gamma, IL-6, IL-4 and IL-2) profiles of the cell culture supernatant from experiments conducted in Example 1;

[0078] FIG. 23 is a graph showing the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of various nanoparticles which were incubated with JAWS II cell line and lymphocytes isolated from C57BL/6 mouse spleen to determine the effect of the formulations on the T cells;

[0079] FIG. 24 are graphs showing the concentration of cytokine (IL-17A and IFN-gamma) release into the cell culture media after the incubation showing in FIG. 23;

[0080] FIG. 25 is a graph showing the CFSE median fluorescence intensity (MFI) after various nanoparticles coated with different chitosans were incubated with the JAWS II cell line and splenocytes, and evaluated for immunogenicity;

[0081] FIG. 26 is a graph showing the proportion of CD3/CD4 positive cells which were measured in the splenocyte population by staining with anti-CD3 and CD4 antibodies and gating for the positive populations;

[0082] FIG. 27 are graphs showing the cytokine (IL-10, IL-17A, TNF, IFN-gamma, IL-6, IL-4 and IL-2) profiles of the cell culture supernatant from the experiments conducted in Example 2;

[0083] FIG. 28A is a graph showing the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 7AAD in JAWSII cells after incubation (24 h) with ASP and AGA chitosan coated PLGA NPs at different concentrations during NP preparation (0.2, 0.5 1.0, 2.0 mg/mL) and FIG. 28B is a graph showing the percentage proportion of 7AAD negative JAWSII cells after incubation (24 h) with ASP and AGA chitosan coated PLGA NPs at different concentrations during NP preparation (0.2, 0.5 1.0, 2.0 mg/mL);

[0084] FIG. 29 shows graphs of median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of various nanoparticles which were incubated with JAWS II cell line and shows the activation of the JAWSII cells with CD40, CD86 and MHC-II;

[0085] FIGS. 30A-C show chitosan coated PLGA NP characteristics after coating with different chitosan concentrations during preparation (n=3 independent batches), FIG. 30D shows chitosan adsorption at different concentrations during preparation (n=3 independent batches), and FIGS. 30E-F show CD40 and CD86 expression after incubation of chitosan coated PLGA NPs with varying concentrations of chitosan during preparation (0.2, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/mL); and

[0086] FIG. 31A shows serum anti-PspA titres after administrations of the formulation in BALB/c mice, all formulations were administered into the lungs through the nose (except for the subcutaneous PspA) on day 0 and 14, and the serum was obtained on day 28 (n=6), and FIG. 31B shows survival after challenge with S. pneumoniae (ATC6303), BALB/c mice were immunised with the formulations through the nose, on day −35 and −21, then challenged with the S. pneumoniae on day 1, the mice were monitored for 14 days after challenge (n=6).

[0087] The following Examples show the production of a nanocarrier system composed of polymers, made using the solvent evaporation method, and subsequently coated with water-soluble chitosan (as most literature references use non-water soluble chitosan which is dissolved in acetic acid). The selection of polymers such as poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA).

[0088] The antigens (PspA, PdT) can be incorporated in the particles, or adsorbed or conjugated to the particle surface. The α-GalCer is incorporated in the layer of the polymer during fabrication of the nanoparticles. The resulting particles are in the nano-size range with polydispersity indexes indicating size range homogeneity.

[0089] The process for the preparation of nanoparticles using the solvent evaporation method involves forming an o/w emulsion of the organic solvent containing the polymer and a-GalCer, and water containing polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), using a probe sonicator. The emulsion is then placed into a larger volume of aqueous phase containing the chitosan, and left stirring to allow the organic phase to evaporate. The resulting suspension of polymeric NPs is centrifuged to separate the PVA and unincorporated α-GalCer and chitosan, from the formed NPs. Antigens for surface adsorption are then added. The fabrication of these NPs could be translated to microfluidic methods for upscaled manufacturing.

[0090] The resulting nanoparticles can be formulated as microparticles for optimal lung deposition. This is achieved through spray drying of the nanoparticles together with excipients (sugars, amino-acids, buffer salts etc) to obtain nanocomposite microparticles (NCMPs), nanoparticles embedded within microcarriers, of desired size (1-5 μm) and homogeneity for optimum delivery to site with in the lungs for targeting antigen presenting cells, such as dendritic cells. The NCMPs will be formulated with a particle size 1-5 μm and aerosolised into the lung to allow deposition in the respirable airways and dissolve releasing the nanocarrier, as they are produced from water-soluble amino acids and sugars. The nanocarrier will be up taken by DCs within the respirable airways. As a dry powder the cold-chain requirement are eliminated, and the nanocarrier and antigen are more stable. In addition, as a dry powder NCMPs it is much easier to deliver via inhalation by patients and can be used as a single dose treatment. The NCMPs can be dispersed in a nebuliser, and aerosolised into the lungs as above also as a single dose treatment.

Example 1

PLGA Polymer Selection

[0091] The polymers outlined below in Table 1 were initially selected for investigating the effects of differences in PLGA polymers. These were based on whether the polymer end was an acid or ester, molecular size, and the ratio of lactic acid to glycolic acid, all relative to the reference polymer.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Lactic Aldrich acid:Gly- Acid or Molecular product Polymer name colic acid ester end size # Reference (Ref) 50:50 Acid 7-17 kDa 719897 Ester 50:50 Ester 7-17 kDa 719889 High molecular 50:50 Acid 24-38 kDa 719870 weight (HMW) 75:25 75:25 Acid 4-15 kDa 719919

Particle Characteristics for Different PLGAs:

[0092] Nanoparticles (NPs) prepared from the different polymers had sizes that were generally similar. As shown in Table 2 below, the zeta potential of the ester and 75:25 polymer NPs appeared to be lower than those of the reference and HMW polymers. The magnitude of the zeta potential decreased for the reference and ester polymers, but increased for the HMW and 75:25 polymers after coating with PspA.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 (data represents average of n = 3) Zeta Size potential (nm) SD PdI SD (mV) SD Before PspA coating Ref 157.8 1.6 0.122 0.007 −29.1 0.8 Ester 151.5 8.9 0.083 0.024 −17.1 1.1 HMW 151.6 1.8 0.068 0.004 −16.7 0.7 75:25 165.4 1.4 0.072 0.008 −15.1 0.3 After PspA coating Ref 169.2 2.7 0.148 0.010 −22.5 1.1 Ester 153.2 9.4 0.080 0.066 −14.0 1.2 HMW 153.5 2.5 0.084 0.018 −25.8 1.9 75:25 166.4 2.5 0.118 0.003 −17.4 0.3

Particle Size Distribution

[0093] The size distribution curves as shown in FIGS. 2 to 5 (and the data also shown in Tables 3 to 6 below) demonstrate that the formed NPs are relatively homogenous in size. The data represented is a single run.

[0094] The data for NPs formed without PspA is shown below in Table 3.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Average size (nm) Peak size (nm) SD (nm) 133.0 143.3 39.91

[0095] The data for NPs using Ester is shown below in Table 4.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Average size (nm) Peak size (nm) SD (nm) 129.2 138.6 37.84

[0096] The data for NPs formed with HMW is shown below in Table 5.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Average size (nm) Peak size (nm) SD (nm) 133.7 143.2 38.64

[0097] The data for NPs formed with a ratio of 75:25 is shown below in Table 6.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Average size (nm) Peak size (nm) SD (nm) 136.4 154.9 55.87

Toxicity

[0098] The NP formulations with PspA were incubated with JAWS II cells at a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL for 24 hours, and stained with 7AAD to determine the toxicity of the formulations. The median fluorescence intensity (MEI) of the 7AAD indicates the state of disruption of the cell membrane. The results show that all of the formulations had a noticeable increase in the MFI, although there were no differences between the polymers and also compared to the LPS (positive control for immunostimulation).

[0099] As illustrated in FIGS. 6 and 7, when presented as a percentage of viable cells, the formulations maintained a viability of over 80% compared to the media group (negative control).

Surface Marker Upregulation on JAWS II Cells after Incubation for 24 Hours

[0100] The NPs formulations with PspA were incubated with JAWS II cells as above, and the cells were subsequently stained for cell surface markers (CD40, CD86 and MHC-II) to determine the immunogenicity of each polymer NP. The groups were; Media only (negative control), PspA only, Reference, Ester, HMW, 75:25, lipopolysaccharide (LPS, positive control). As illustrated in FIG. 8, the Ref and 75:25 generally exhibited the highest surface marker upregulation compared to the HMW and Ester polymers.

Chitosan Selection

[0101] The subsequent goal was to investigate the effect of the type of coated chitosan on the NP formulations. Various chitosans (as detailed in Table 7 below) with different molecular structures were tested to determine their effect on particle properties and immunogenicity.

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Molecular Degree of Chitosan name weight deacetylation Product # HCl 80-95% 43001 HMC Low molecular weight 50,000-190,000 75-85% 448869 Aldrich (LMW) Da Trimethylchitosan NA NA Made in lab (TMC) from LMW Carboxymethylchitosan 80-95% 43002 HMC (CMC) Oligomer <5 kDa  ≥75% 44009 HMC Glutamate NA NA 44006 HMC Glycol NA NA G7753 Sigma chitosan aspartate ~200 kDa NA ChiPro (ASP) chitosan-g- ~200 kDa NA ChiPro acrylamidoglycolic acid (AGA)

Particle Characteristics of Different Chitosans

[0102] The chitosan coating changed the NP size. As shown in Tables 8 and 9 below, the CMC and glycol chitosans had the greatest effect, increasing the NP size from approximately 150 nm to >200 nm (without PspA) and 140 nm to >300 nm (with PspA). The NP surface charge also differed greatly between the chitosans, with CMC and oligomer chitosans exhibiting negative zeta potential.

Reference Polymer:

[0103]

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Zeta Size potential (nm) SD PdI SD (mV) SD Before PspA coating No chitosan 152.7 22.9 0.121 0.083 −23.1 5.1 HCl 141.6 8.8 0.146 0.032 19.6 2.2 LMW 137.9 4.8 0.124 0.008 26.9 4.7 TMC 160.9 1.2 0.185 0.036 7.8 2.9 CMC 245.1 39.1 0.226 0.040 −20.6 22.9 Oligomer 167.7 8.0 0.231 0.071 −6.1 1.4 Glutamate 147.2 9.2 0.175 0.057 17.9 14.0 Glycol 195.1 44.9 0.140 0.020 27.2 14.3 After PspA coating No chitosan 137.9 4.5 0.094 0.049 −23.5 2.5 HCl 188.1 11.3 0.338 0.073 12.6 3.8 LMW 142.8 7.7 0.135 0.015 17.8 0.8 TMC 214.8 65.6 0.237 0.051 0.5 1.6 CMC 324.1 77.8 0.210 0.078 −32.1 0.6 Oligomer 181.8 24.9 0.251 0.103 −8.5 0.9 Glutamate 164.1 16.8 0.191 0.047 23.1 1.0 Glycol 551.4 91.0 0.401 0.040 30.3 0.9

75:25 Polymer:

[0104]

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Zeta Size potential (nm) SD PdI SD (mV) SD Before PspA coating No chitosan 143.1 1.7 0.071 0.032 −26.9 6.7 HCl 155.7 13.2 0.164 0.067 17.6 4.1 LMW 153.0 7.5 0.152 0.012 28.3 4.3 TMC 150.0 4.8 0.090 0.018 9.1 6.6 CMC 254.1 80.3 0.194 0.063 −30.6 2.6 Oligomer 161.6 12.3 0.158 0.065 −5.2 0.8 Glutamate 155.1 15.3 0.084 0.022 25.6 1.6 Glycol 287.0 30.2 0.099 0.049 33.5 1.2 After PspA coating No chitosan 162.3 24.8 0.130 0.097 −22.4 3.2 HCl 212.4 6.0 0.294 0.095 10.3 13.9 LMW 161.9 4.7 0.151 0.013 20.8 1.9 TMC 189.7 12.9 0.194 0.067 0.0 1.4 CMC 279.8 19.8 0.174 0.060 −32.5 0.8 Oligomer 161.3 3.9 0.152 0.028 −8.6 0.6 Glutamate 270.3 12.2 0.235 0.056 17.8 3.6 Glycol 622.4 74.7 0.245 0.089 27.8 1.0

[0105] There were some differences between the Ref and 75:25 polymers for each chitosan tested, and the Ref chitosan formulations look to be generally smaller. But the overall pattern appeared similar, with the CMC and glycol chitosans exhibiting the largest particle sizes.

Particle Size Distribution

[0106] The size distribution curves as shown in FIGS. 9 to 16 (and the data also shown in Tables 10 to 17 below) demonstrate that the formed NPs. The data represented is a single run.

[0107] Reference PLGA (without PspA):

[0108] The data for NPs formed with no chitosan is show below in Table 10.

TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Average size (nm) Peak size (nm) SD (nm) 142.1 157.8 49.4

[0109] The data for NPs formed with HCl is shown below in Table 11.

TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Average size (nm) Peak size (nm) SD (nm) 145.1 160.3 58.11
Reference PLGA (with PspA):

[0110] The data for NPs formed without chitosan is shown in below Table 12.

TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Average size (nm) Peak size (nm) SD (nm) 142.7 152.6 39.25

[0111] The data for NPs formed with HCl is shown below in Table 13.

TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 13 Average size (nm) Peak size (nm) SD (nm) 235.8 255.7 83.16
75:25 PLGA (without PspA):

[0112] The data for NPs formed without chitosan is shown in below Table 14.

TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 14 Average size (nm) Peak size (nm) SD (nm) 140.3 156.1 53.67

[0113] The data for NPs formed with HCl is shown below in Table 15.

TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 15 Average size (nm) Peak size (nm) SD (nm) 176.3 246.2 160.6
75:25 PLGA (with PspA):

[0114] The data for NPs formed without chitosan is shown in below Table 16.

TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 16 Average size (nm) Peak size (nm) SD (nm) 152.4 160.1 39.22

[0115] The data for NPs formed with HCl is shown below in Table 17.

TABLE-US-00017 TABLE 17 Average size (nm) Peak size (nm) SD (nm) 210.1 230.2 72.02

Toxicity

[0116] The toxicity of Ref+chitosan with PspA & 75:25+chitosan with PspA were evaluated again using 7AAD. The toxicity reflects the pattern shown by the immunogenicity of the Ref chitosan formulations, with the HCl and glycol formulations exhibiting the highest MFI. As shown in FIGS. 17 and 18, the patterns are slightly different between Ref and 75:25, with CMC and oligomer formulations exhibiting the highest MFI for 75:25.

Surface Marker Upregulation on JAWS II Cells after Incubation for 24 Hours

[0117] The CD40 and CD86 surface marker upregulation was investigated again in JAWS II cells using Ref+chitosan with PspA & 75:25+chitosan with PspA. As shown in FIGS. 19 and 20, the ref and 75:25 polymers exhibited similar patterns of upregulation, with the HCl and glycol having the highest MEI for CD40, and HCl and LMW having the highest CD86 expression.

[0118] From the data obtained, the ref and 75:25 PLGA polymers, and the HCl chitosan induced the highest immunogenicity.

Co-Culture Model of JAWS II Cells and Mouse Splenocytes

[0119] The effect of the 75:25 PLGA HCl chitosan NPs on the T cells was investigated in a co-culture assay, as T cells interact with the dendritic cells (JAWS II cells) and subsequently participates in the immune response. The T cell effect offers insight into the direction of how the immune response will progress. Mouse splenocytes which contain a relatively abundance number of T cells, were incubated with the JAWS II cells and the 75:25 PLGA HCl chitosan NPs, and the splenocyte proliferation and cytokine release were measured after 5 days. The results indicated that the chitosan and α-Galactosylceramide (α-Galcer) both had effect on the immune response by the T cells.

Splenocyte Proliferation

[0120] The splenocytes were stained with CFSE and the MFI was measured to determine degree of cell proliferation. As shown in FIG. 21, the NP with the chitosan and α-GalCer (AGC) exhibited the lowest MFI, indicating greatest degree of cell division.

Supernatant Cytokine

[0121] The cell culture supernatant was obtained and cytokines were measured using cytometric bead array (CBA) assay. As shown in FIG. 22, the NP with PspA and α-GalCer generally exhibited the highest cytokine release. The NP formulations and LPS (positive control) appeared to exhibit different degrees of cytokine release. These experiments were then repeated with ref and 75:25 PLGA with all chitosans and α-GalCer as detailed in Example 2 below.

Example 2

Co-Culture Experiment 1

[0122] NPs were incubated with DCs (JAWS II cell line) and lymphocytes isolated from C57BL/6 mouse spleen to determine the effect of the formulations on the T cells. As shown in FIG. 23, the NPs with PspA and α-GalCer exhibited the lowest CFSE MFI, indicating proliferation of cells isolated from the spleen.

[0123] Cytokine release into the cell culture media was also measured from the above experiment. As shown in FIG. 24, the results indicated that the α-GalCer containing formulations were causing the release of IL-17A and IFN-γ, which may be important as part of the immune response for vaccines.

Co-Culture Experiment 2

[0124] NPs (made from 75:25 PLGA) coated with different chitosans were incubated with the DCs and splenocytes, as in the previous experiment, and evaluated for immunogenicity. As shown in FIG. 25, the lower CFSE MFI signal of the splenocytes indicated proliferation, but there may all chitosan groups exhibited similar results.

[0125] The proportion of CD3/CD4 positive cells were measured in the splenocyte population by staining with anti-CD3 and CD4 antibodies and gating for the positive populations. As shown in FIG. 26, the data showed greater CD3/CD4 positive proportions in the HCL, LMW and TMC chitosan groups, indicating T cell proliferation. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was unfortunately not the best positive control for the experiment.

[0126] As shown in FIG. 27, cytokine release into the cell culture medium was also measured but did not show any consistent pattern.

Example 3

Particle Characteristics

[0127] Non-animal source ASP and AGA chitosan coated PLGA NPs were assessed and were shown to exhibit similar particle sizes of approximately 170 nm before PspA coating. The particle surface charge differed significantly with the ASP chitosan coated NPs having a +30 mV zeta potential compared to +17 mV for the AGA chitosan. As shown in FIG. 18 below, after coating, the zeta potentials were similar at the low +20 s, whereas the particle size was now different, with the AGA having a greater size increase compared to the ASP chitosan.

TABLE-US-00018 TABLE 18 Size Zeta potential (nm) PdI (mV) Before PspA adsorption ASP 171.1 ± 1.9 0.151 ± 0.002 +30.2 ± 1.0 AGA 169.0 ± 0.1 0.101 ± 0.013 +17.1 ± 0.5 After PspA adsorption ASP 197.2 ± 2.8 0.119 ± 0.033 +23.1 ± 1.0 AGA 233.0 ± 4.1 0.277 ± 0.041 +20.2 ± 1.0

PspA and Chitosan Absorption

[0128] As shown in Table 19 below, both ASP and AGA chitosan coated NPs exhibit high adsorption of PspA, but differ greatly in adsorption of the respective chitosans.

TABLE-US-00019 TABLE 19 PspA adsorption efficiency Chitosan adsorption efficiency (%) (%) ASP 90.6 ± 8.1  18.2 ± 4.9 AGA 88.2 ± 11.4 50.8 ± 2.1

Toxicity

[0129] As shown in FIGS. 28A and 28B, the toxicity of the ASP and AGA chitosan coated PLGA NPs were evaluated in JAWS II cells, which indicated high cell viability of over 88%, compared to the untreated cells which had 96% viability. The 7AAD MFI suggested a chitosan concentration dependent pattern, with highest ASP concentration exhibiting the highest 7AAD MFI.

DC Activation

[0130] As shown in FIG. 29, The activation of the JAWSII cells suggested a concentration dependent pattern for CD40, with higher ASP and AGA chitosan concentrations exhibiting the highest CD40 MFI. In terms of CD86 and MHC-II, the 1 mg/mL concentration exhibited higher MFI compared to 2 mg/mL.

Example 4

Effect of Chitosan HCl Concentration During NP Preparation

[0131] The concentration dependency of chitosan on particle characteristics and immunogenicity was determined, by coating NPs with differing chitosan concentrations and measuring the CD40 and CD86 surface marker expression on the JAWS II cells. The results indicated that the zeta potential exhibits the most significant change in NP characteristics at differing chitosan concentrations, whereas the size remains relatively constant (FIGS. 30A-C). The adsorption efficiency also remains relatively constant at all tested concentrations (FIG. 30D), but the immunogenicity plateaus after 0.5 mg/mL preparatory chitosan concentration (FIGS. 30E-F). This indicates that greater chitosan adsorption does not necessarily correlate to greater immunogenicity.

Example 5

Effect of the Incorporation of α-Galactosylceramide (α-GalCer)

[0132] The incorporation of α-GalCer, into Chitosan HCl coated ref PLGA NPs, had very little effect on the size and surface charge of the NPs. Quantification of incorporated α-GalCer by LC-MS/MS revealed a high degree of incorporation of the α-GalCer used for preparation (Table 20).

TABLE-US-00020 TABLE 20 Particle properties with/without α-GalCer incorporation (n = 3 independently prepared batches) Zeta α-GalCer Size potential encapsulation (nm) PdI (mV) efficiency (%) No α-GalCer 139.6 ± 2.7 0.118 ± 0.025 19.9 ± 0.9 α-GalCer 137.4 ± 0.2 0.148 ± 0.012 20.8 ± 1.3 97.9 ± 0.6

Example 6

[0133] In Vivo Efficacy of PLGA HCl Chitosan NPs with and without α-GalCer

[0134] To determine in vivo efficacy, the ref PLGA HCl chitosan NPs with α-GalCer (α-GCCHPSPA-NP) or without (CHPSPA-NP) were tested in a mouse model. Administration into the lungs of the α-GCCHPSPA-NP, resuspended from the spray dried form, resulted in the induction of high serum anti-PspA levels (FIG. 31A). This result also correlated with greater protection against S. pneumoniae, when the vaccinated mice were challenged with ATC6303. The administration of α-GCCHPSPA-NP resulted in greater protection compared to all control groups including the subcutaneously administered PspA (FIG. 31B).

[0135] The forgoing embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the protection afforded by the claims, but rather to describe examples of how the invention may be put into practice.

REFERENCES

[0136] [1] K. Kawakami, N. Yamamoto, Y. Kinjo, K. Miyagi, C. Nakasone, K. Uezu, T. Kinjo, T. Nakayama, M. Taniguchi, A. Saito, Critical role of Vα14+ natural killer T cells in the innate phase of host protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae infection, Eur. J. Immunol., 33 (2003) 3322-3330. [0137] [2] F. Fotouhi, M. Shaffifar, B. Farahmand, S. Shirian, M. Saeidi, A. Tabarraei, A. Gorji, A. Ghaemi, Adjuvant use of the NKT cell agonist alpha-galactosylceramide leads to enhancement of M2-based DNA vaccine immunogenicity and protective immunity against influenza A virus, Arch. Virol., 162 (2017) 1251-1260. [0138] [3] C. Guillonneau, J. D. Mintern, F.-X. Hubert, A. C. Hurt, G. S. Besra, S. Porcelli, I. G. Barr, P. C. Doherty, D. I. Godfrey, S. J. Turner, Combined NKT cell activation and influenza virus vaccination boosts memory CTL generation and protective immunity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (2009) 3330-3335. [0139] [4] M. J. Jedrzejas, Pneumococcal virulence factors: structure and function, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 65 (2001) 187-207; first page, table of contents. [0140] [5] A. D. Schoofs, Development of a protein antigen based pneumococcal vaccine utilizing a polyanhydride nanoparticle delivery platform, in: Veterinary Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, Iowa State University, 2013. [0141] [6] J. Xu, W. Dai, Z. Wang, B. Chen, Z. Li, X. Fan, Intranasal Vaccination with Chitosan-DNA Nanoparticles Expressing Pneumococcal Surface Antigen A Protects Mice against Nasopharyngeal Colonization by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology: CVI, 18 (2011) 75-81. [0142] [7] I. G. Kong, A. Sato, Y. Yuki, T. Nochi, H. Takahashi, S. Sawada, M. Mejima, S. Kurokawa, K. Okada, S. Sato, D. E. Briles, J. Kunisawa, Y. Inoue, M. Yamamoto, K. Akiyoshi, H. Kiyono, Nanogel-Based PspA Intranasal Vaccine Prevents Invasive Disease and Nasal Colonization by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Infect. Immun., 81 (2013) 1625-1634. [0143] [8] H. Y. Kang, J. Srinivasan, R. Curtiss, 3rd, Immune responses to recombinant pneumococcal PspA antigen delivered by live attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium vaccine, Infect. Immun., 70 (2002) 1739-1749. [0144] [9] D. E. Briles, S. K. Hollingshead, J. C. Paton, E. W. Ades, L. Novak, F. W. van Ginkel, W. H. Benjamin, Jr., Immunizations with pneumococcal surface protein A and pneumolysin are protective against pneumonia in a murine model of pulmonary infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae, J. Infect. Dis., 188 (2003) 339-348. [0145] [10] C. Goulart, T. R. d. Silva, D. Rodriguez, W. R. Politano, L. C. C. Leite, M. Darrieux, Characterization of Protective Immune Responses Induced by Pneumococcal Surface Protein A in Fusion with Pneumolysin Derivatives, PLoS One, 8 (2013) e59605.