METHOD FOR CORRECTING AT LEAST ONE MEASURED VALUE OF A CORIOLIS MEASURING DEVICE AND SUCH A CORIOLIS MEASURING DEVICE

Abstract

A method for correcting a measured value of a measured variable with reference to a medium flowing through at least two measuring tubes, wherein each measuring tube is excited by an oscillation exciter to execute oscillations, and wherein the oscillations of each measuring tube are registered by oscillation sensors, wherein an electronic circuit monitors at least two of the following measured variables or, in each case, a measured variable derived therefrom: phase difference between measurement signals, resonant frequency, ratio of an oscillation exciter electrical current amplitude to a measuring tube oscillation amplitude, the method including: determining a plausibility; and, wherein upon failing a plausibility requirement of at least one of the measured variables, determining measured values of the measured variables of at least one, first/second measuring tube as a function of corresponding measured values of the measured variables of at least one, second/first measurement tube.

Claims

1-14. (canceled)

15. A method for correcting at least one measured value of a measured variable with reference to a medium flowing through at least two measuring tubes, wherein measured values are registered using a Coriolis measuring device, wherein the Coriolis measuring device includes a first group of measuring tubes and a second group of measuring tubes including, in each case, at least one measuring tube configured to convey the medium, at least one oscillation exciter and at least two oscillation sensors, wherein each measuring tube is excited by the at least one oscillation exciter to execute oscillations, and wherein the oscillations of each measuring tube are registered by the at least two oscillation sensors, wherein the measuring tubes of different groups are decoupled from each other, wherein an electronic measuring/operating circuit of the Coriolis measuring device monitors for the first group and the second group of measuring tubes, in each case, at least one of the following measured variables or, in each case, a measured variable derived therefrom: phase difference between measurement signals of the at least two oscillation sensors; resonant frequency; oscillation exciter electrical current amplitude and measuring tube oscillation amplitude, the method comprising: determining a plausibility for the at least one measuring tube of the first group and for the at least one measuring tube of the second group, in each case, based on at least one of the monitored measured variables; and when a plausibility requirement is not fulfilled, in the case of at least one of the measured variables registered by via the first group or second group of measuring tubes, determining measured values of the measured variables of the first group or second group as a function of corresponding measured values of the measured variables registered by via of the at least one second or first group, respectively.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein a maintaining of a plausibility requirement requires fulfillment of at least one of the following criteria: measured values of the at least one measured variable lie in a desired measured value range; and a first and/or second time derivative of a measured value function of time of the at least one measured variable lies, in each case, within its desired range;

17. The method of claim 16, further comprising: when the plausibility requirement is not fulfilled by the first group and by the second group, determining a first plausibility value for the first group and a second plausibility value for the second group; and correcting measured values of the measured variables registered by a less plausible group of the first and second groups using corresponding measured values of the measured variables registered by a more plausible group of the first and second groups, wherein determining the first and second plausibility values includes using at least one of the following criteria: deviation of measured values from the desired measured value range; and deviation of the first and/or second time derivative of a measured value function of time of the at least one measured variable from the desired range.

18. The method of claim 15, further comprising: when the plausibility requirement is not fulfilled by the first group and by the second group, replacing current measured values with historical measured values from before not fulfilling the plausibility requirement

19. The method of claim 15, wherein the desired measured value range and/or the desired range is predetermined, or wherein the desired measured value range and/or the desired range is determined based on corresponding earlier measured values and/or measured value function of time.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein a preceding time range of at least 5 minutes and of at most 240 minutes is taken into consideration.

21. The method of claim 19, wherein a preceding time range of at least 30 minutes and of at most 120 minutes is taken into consideration.

22. The method of claim 15, wherein a derived measured variable of a measured variable is one of oscillation damping, mass flow, density, viscosity and Reynolds number.

23. The method of claim 15, wherein the at least one measuring tube of the first group has different oscillation characteristics compared with the at least one measuring tube of the second group, and wherein the at least one measuring tube of the first group and the at least one measuring tube of the second group are excited with different oscillation frequencies.

24. The method of claim 15, wherein a correction factor is applied for correcting the measured values with reference to at least one measuring tube of the first group and/or the second group, wherein the correction factor takes into consideration at least one of the following properties of the at least one measuring tube of the first group and of the at least one measuring tube of the second group: flow resistance, temperature, length and diameter.

25. The method of claim 15, wherein two measuring tubes of the first group and two measuring tubes of the second group are caused pairwise, in each case, to oscillate with opposite phase by the at least one oscillation exciter, and wherein measuring tube oscillations of the two measuring tubes of the first group and the two measuring tubes of the second group are detected pairwise, in each case, using at least two oscillation sensors.

26. A Coriolis measuring device adapted for performing a method for correcting at least one measured value of a measured variable with reference to a medium flowing through at least two measuring tubes, the measuring device comprising: a first group of measuring tubes including at least one measuring tube configured to convey a medium and a second group of measuring tubes including at least one measuring tube configured to convey the medium, wherein each measuring tube has an inlet and an outlet; at least one oscillation exciter adapted to excite the measuring tubes of the first and second groups to execute oscillations; at least two oscillation sensors adapted to register the oscillations of the measuring tubes of the first and second groups; an electronic measuring/operating circuit configured to operate the oscillation exciter and the oscillation sensors and to determine and output mass flow, and/or flow velocity, and/or density measured values and to execute the method according to claim 15; a support body configured to support the measuring tubes; and an electronics housing embodied to house the electronic measuring/operating circuit.

27. The measuring device of claim 26, wherein at at least one measuring tube of the first group and at at least one measuring tube of the second group, in each case, at least one temperature detector is disposed and adapted to register a temperature of the corresponding measuring tube, and wherein the electronic measuring/operating circuit is configured to operate the temperature detector.

28. The measuring device of claim 26, further comprising at the inlet and at the outlet of the at least one measuring tube of a group, in each case, a securement apparatus configured to define a position, in each case, of an outer oscillatory node, wherein the securement apparatus comprises at least one plate, which at least partially embraces at least one measuring tube.

29. The measuring device of claim 26, further comprising a first manifold and a second manifold, wherein the first manifold is configured to present a flow of medium to the inlets, and wherein the second manifold is configured to collect a flow of medium from the outlets.

Description

[0043] The invention will now be described based on examples of embodiments presented in the appended drawing, the figures of which show as follows:

[0044] FIG. 1 the construction of a typical Coriolis measuring device;

[0045] FIG. 2 by way of example, measured value functions of time for two different measured variables; and

[0046] FIG. 3 the steps of a method of the invention.

[0047] FIG. 1 shows the construction of a Coriolis measuring device 10, wherein the Coriolis measuring device has four measuring tubes 11 with, in each case, an inlet 11.31 and an outlet 11.32, wherein two measuring tubes belong to a first group 11.1 of measuring tubes and two measuring tubes belong to a second group 11.2 of measuring tubes. The Coriolis measuring device includes for each group of measuring tubes, in each case, an oscillation exciter 12, and, in each case, two oscillation sensors 13, which are adapted, respectively, to excite the measuring tubes of its group to execute oscillations and to register their oscillations. The visible oscillation exciter is only schematically shown. Those skilled in the art can select suitable, available oscillation sensors. The Coriolis measuring device includes, furthermore, two manifolds 19 and two process connectors 18. The oscillation exciters are adapted to excite, in each case, two measuring tubes of a first group of measuring tubes 11.1 and two measuring tubes of a second group of measuring tubes 11.2 to execute oscillations relative to one another perpendicularly to a measuring tube longitudinal plane defined, in each case, by the bends of the measuring tubes. The oscillation sensors are adapted to register the oscillations imposed on the measuring tubes of each group of measuring tubes. A first manifold 19.1 on an upstream side of the measuring transducer is adapted to receive a medium flowing from a pipeline into the measuring transducer and to convey such to the inlets of the two measuring tubes, and a second manifold 19.2 is adapted to receive the medium emerging from the outlets of the two measuring tubes and to convey such back into the pipeline. The number of measuring tubes is, in this case, purely by way of example. Thus alternatively, for example, the first group and the second group can have, in each case, only one measuring tube, so that a total of two measuring tubes are present. A securement apparatus 17 comprising, in each case, at least one plate 17.1 defines, in each case, an oscillation node at the measuring tube inlet and one at the measuring tube outlet.

[0048] The Coriolis measuring device includes an electronics housing 15, which is adapted to house an electronic measuring/operating circuit 14, which is adapted to operate the oscillation exciter as well as the oscillation sensors and based on oscillation characteristics of the measuring tubes of the groups of measuring tubes, as measured by means of the oscillation sensors, to ascertain and to provide flow measured values and/or density measured values. The Coriolis measuring device can also have one or more temperature detectors (not shown) placed outside on one or more measuring tubes. This allows, for example, determining measuring tube properties influencing the oscillatory behavior of the measuring tube.

[0049] FIG. 2 shows measured value functions of time of measured variables MV1 and MV2, based on which the method of the invention is explained in the following examples. The measured variables MV1 and MV2 can be two different measured variables, which are registered by means of the at least one measuring tube of the first group or by means of the at least one measuring tube of the second group. The measured variables MV1 and MV2 can also be equal measured variables, which are registered by means of the at least one measuring tube of the first group and by means of the at least one measuring tube of the second group. The measured value functions of time are vertically shifted apart for purposes of illustration. They can be different or essentially equal.

[0050] For explaining the method for the case that the measured variables MV1 and MV2 are equal and monitored by different measuring tubes, or groups, thus, the at least one measuring tube of the first group and the at least one measuring tube of the second group, and are expected to have very similar measured values, or very similar measured value functions of time, it should then be assumed that the measured value functions of time except for the time period t1 to t2 are essentially equal. Measured variable MV1 has a measured value function of time like measured variable MV2, except that in the time range t1 to t2 the measured variable MV1 shows a fluctuation of the measured value function of time.

[0051] For checking the satisfying of plausibility requirements by the measured value functions of time, it can be checked whether measured values of the at least one measured variable, in this case, MV1, lie in a desired measured value range, and/or whether a first and/or second time derivative of a measured value function of time of the at least one measured variable lies, in each case, within a desired range. In case MV1 does not satisfy the plausibility requirement, then the measured value function of time of the measured variable MV1 in the time range t1 to t2 can be ascertained by means of the measured value function of time of the corresponding measured variable in the case of at least one other measuring tube. One skilled in the art can choose a desired range, or desired measured value range, according to given requirements and estimates.

[0052] For the case, in which the measured variable MV1 violates a plausibility requirement, measured values of the measured variable MV2 can be taken into consideration, in order to ascertain the measured value function of time of the measured variable MV1 in a violation period, in this case, from t1 to t2. For example, in the case of measured variables such as density or viscosity, this can mean a replacement. The ascertaining can, however, also take into consideration differences between the at least one measuring tube of the first group and the at least one measuring tube of the second group. Thus, for example, a flow at equal media pressure can be different due to different flow resistances of the at least one measuring tube of the first group 11.1 and the at least one measuring tube of the second group 11.2. Such differences can be accounted for, for example, by means of a factor F. Those skilled in the art can select corresponding procedures.

[0053] Corresponding considerations hold for the case, in which both measured variables MV1 and MV2 are measured variables registered by means of either the at least one measuring tube of the first group or the at least one measuring tube of the second group. For example, MV1 can be a phase difference between measurement signals of at least two oscillation sensors of the at least one, first/second measuring tube and, thus, correspond to a mass flow, and MV2 can be a resonant frequency of the at least one measuring tube of the first/second group and, thus, correspond to a media density. In case the measured value functions of time of the two measured variables do not correspond to one another, that can be an indication of insufficient plausibility. In such case, measured values of the measured variables MV1 and MV2 are ascertained by means of corresponding measured values registered by means of the second/first group. It can be advantageous to check the measured variables MV1 and MV2 at the, in each case, other at least one measuring tube. Thus, for example, in the case of turning on a pump a media density can remain constant at the at least one, first measurement tube and at the at least one, second measuring tube, while the mass flow, however, varies greatly, so that, when considering only the at least one, first measurement tube or the at least one, second measuring tube, a situation of lacking plausibility is present. In case, however, such as in this example, the media density remains the same at the at least one measuring tube of the first group and at the at least one measuring tube of the second group, while the mass flow greatly varies, this can indicate the presence of plausible measured values.

[0054] Resonance frequency changes at essentially constant mass flow can result, for example, from the presence of gas bubbles in a liquid medium. Gas bubbles lessen also a local density of the liquid medium and influence, thus, an oscillation sensor amplitude. An oscillation sensor amplitude fluctuation can, thus, indicate the presence of gas bubbles and a lacking plausibility. In case the oscillation exciters are so operated that a Coriolis oscillatory mode has a constant amplitude, gas bubbles can have effects on an oscillation exciter electrical current amplitude to be set. Also that can be an indication of gas bubbles and indicate insufficient plausibility. A change, especially an increase of oscillation damping, can also be an indication of a presence of gas bubbles and, thus, insufficient plausibility.

[0055] For the case, in which measured values of measured variables of the at least one, first measurement tube and the at least one, second measuring tube are implausible, historical data can be used. Thus, for example, historical data of the at least one, first measurement tube and the at least one, second measuring tube can be provided. For the case, in which for the at least one measuring tube of the first group, or the at least one measuring tube of the second group, historical data are only limitedly usable, for example, because measured values of the at least one measuring tube of the first group, or at least one measuring tube of the second group have been implausible for too long, then historical data of the at least one measuring tube of the second group, or of the at least one measuring tube of the first group, can be used for the at least one measuring tube of the first group, or at least one measuring tube of the second group, as the case may be.

[0056] FIG. 3 shows schematically the steps of a method 100 of the invention.

[0057] In a first method step 101, continuously or in time intervals, a plausibility of the measured values of measured variables of the at least one measuring tube of the first group and the at least one measuring tube of the second group is determined. In the case of establishing that measured values of a measured variable are implausible, such as shown by way of example in FIG. 2 with MV1, then in a second method step 102 plausible measured values are ascertained and used for providing measured values.

LIST OF REFERENCE CHARACTERS

[0058] 10 Coriolis measuring device

[0059] 11 measuring tube

[0060] 11.1 first group of measuring tubes

[0061] 11.2 second group of measuring tubes

[0062] 11.31 inlet

[0063] 11.32 outlet

[0064] 12 oscillation exciter

[0065] 13 oscillation sensor

[0066] 14 electronic measuring/operating circuit

[0067] 15 electronics housing

[0068] 16 temperature detector

[0069] 17 securement apparatus

[0070] 17.1 plate

[0071] 18 support body

[0072] 19 manifold

[0073] 19.1 first manifold

[0074] 19.2 second manifold

[0075] 100 method

[0076] 101 first method step

[0077] 102 second method step

[0078] MV measured variable