GRASS ENDOPHYTES
20210400987 · 2021-12-30
Inventors
Cpc classification
A01N63/30
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A01N63/30
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
A method of improving the viability, persistence, and/or vigor of a host plant in the form of Lolium multiflorum Lolium x hybridum and Lolium perenne, (host grass) includes artificially inoculating the host grass with an LpTG-3 endophyte RGT18 strain. The LpTG-3 endophyte RGT18 strain can produce at least one alkaloid or combination of alkaloids that provide the host grass with a favorable alkaloid profile and/or protect the plant from biotic stresses.
Claims
1. A method of improving viability, persistence, and/or vigor of a host grass, the method comprising: artificially inoculating the host grass with either: an LpTG-3 endophyte RGT18 strain classified within the taxonomic group Epichloë festucae var. lolii species LpTG, wherein variations in morphology and/or alkaloid profiles of the RGT18 strain over known species LpTG-3 strain are as exemplified by the RGT18 strain deposited at National Measurement Institute and accorded accession number V18/011211; or an LpTG-1 endophyte RGT15 strain classified within the taxonomic group Epichloë festucae var. lolii species LpTG, wherein variations in morphology and/or alkaloid profiles of the RGT15 strain over known species LpTG-1 strain are as exemplified by the RGT15 strain deposited at National Measurement Institute and accorded accession number V18/011210; producing from the RGT15 or RGT18 strain at least one alkaloid or combination of alkaloids that provide the host grass with a favorable alkaloid profile; and thereby protecting the host grass from biotic stresses, wherein the host grass is a host plant in the form of Lolium multiflorum Lolium x hybridum and Lolium perenne.
2. The method as claimed in claim 17, wherein the alkaloid is at least one janthitrem epoxide compound.
3. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the at least one janthitrem epoxide compound is selected from the group consisting of epoxy janthitrem I, epoxy janthitrem II, epoxy janthitrem III, epoxy janthitrem IV and combinations thereof.
4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the host grass is inoculated with the LpTG-1 RGT15 endophyte strain.
5. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the alkaloid is selected from the group consisting of a peramine, ergovaline, and a combination thereof.
6. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein a first host grass is inoculated with the RGT15 strain and a second host grass is inoculated with the RGT18 strain said method further comprising: co-growing the first and second host grasses or progeny thereof.
7. A production zone for growing at least one host grass, wherein the at least one host grass has been inoculated according to the method of claim 1.
8. The production zone as claimed in claim 7, comprising two host grasses, wherein a first host grass is inoculated by the RGT18 strain, at least one alkaloid or combination of alkaloids that provide the host grass with a favorable alkaloid profile is produced from the RGT18 strain, and the first host grass is thereby protected from biotic stresses; and wherein a second host grass is inoculated by an RGT15 strain, at least one alkaloid or combination of alkaloids that provide the host grass with a favorable alkaloid profile is produced from the RGT15 strain, and the first host grass is thereby protected from biotic stresses.
9. The production zone as claimed in claim 8, wherein the two host grasses are randomly interspersed within the production zone.
10. The production zone as claimed in claim 8, wherein the two host grasses are grown in discrete regions within the production zone.
11. The production zone as claimed in claim 10, wherein the two host grasses are each grown in a respective half of the production zone.
12. (canceled)
13. A method of providing seasonal variation in alkaloids in a host grass, the method comprising improving viability, persistence, and/or vigor of the host grass according to the method of claim 1, wherein the seasonal variation in the alkaloids is provided by alkaloids produced by said LpTG-3 endophyte RGT18 strain or said LpTG-1 endophyte RGT15 strain.
14. A method of increased insect tolerance in a host grass, the method comprising improving viability, persistence, and/or vigor of the host grass according to the method of claim 1, wherein the increased insect tolerance is relative to known endophyte grasses.
15. (canceled)
16. A method of reducing or limiting side effects of staggers on grazing animals, the method comprising: improving viability, persistence, and/or vigor of the host grass according to the method of claim 1; and grazing the animals on the host grass.
17. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the host grass is inoculated with the LpTG-3 endophyte RGT18 strain.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0071] Further aspects of the present invention will become apparent from the ensuing description which is given by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
[0072]
[0073]
[0074]
[0075]
[0076]
[0077]
[0078]
[0079]
[0080]
[0081]
[0082]
[0083]
[0084]
[0085]
[0086]
[0087]
[0088]
[0089]
[0090]
[0091]
[0092]
BEST MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
Example 1
[0093] SSR Genotyping (B Loci Methods)
[0094] DNA was extracted from each sample using the MagAttract Plant DNA kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The endophyte-specific SSR markers, B10 and B111 were used for PCR-based in planta detection of endophytes. PCR amplifications were performed in 12.5 μl reaction volumes containing 1 μL genomic DNA (5 ng/μl), 1×PCR buffer (Bioline, London, UK), 0.2 μM of forward and reverse primer (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo., USA; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., USA), 0.125 μl of 5 mM dNTP (GE Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, UK), 1 U immolase (Bioline), and was processed in a thermocycler (DNA Engine, Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif., USA) programmed for 10 min at 95° C. followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 94° C., 2 min at 65° C., 1 min at 72° C., then 10 min at 72° C.
[0095] The PCR products were diluted with sterile Milli-Q water (1:10), and 2 μl of the diluted product was mixed with 8 μl of ABI 3730 loading solution [7.95 μl of Hi-Di™ formamide (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., USA), 0.05 μl of 500Liz™ (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., USA) size standard] before analysis on the ABI 3730xl automated capillary electrophoresis platform (Applied Biosystems Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., USA). Products were detected using the GeneMapper version 3.7 software (Applied Biosystems Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., USA), and endophyte samples were identified by the presence of amplification peaks specific for each SSR marker.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 SSR marker profile of selected endophyte strains at the B10 and B11 loci [7]. B11 (bp) Endophyte Taxonomic Alkaloid B10 Allele Allele strain group profile (bp) 1 2 RAGT/R2n Endophytes 1.4.4 LpTG-1 EP 176 238 RGT18 LpTG-3 J 162 131 RGT15 LpTG-1 EP 176 152 156 1.9.7 LpTG-1 EP 176 160 164 2.5.3 LpTG-1 EP 176 152 156 1.11.13 LpTG-1 EP 176 172 Commercial Endophytes NEA6 LpTG-1 EP 176 199 AR37 LpTG-3 J 162 131 SE LpTG-1 LEP 176 176 AR1 LpTG-1 P 176 148 LpTG—Lolium perenne Taxonomic Group; E—ergovaline; P—peramine; J—janthitrems; L—lolitrem B; bp—base pair
Example 2: Genome Sequencing to Identify SNP Variation Between RGT18 and AR37
[0096] 2.1 Illumina Platform Sequencing
[0097] DNA Extraction
[0098] DNA for genome survey sequencing was extracted from lyophilized mycelia using a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) based extraction method (Möller et al. 1992), and the quality and quantity of the DNA was assessed by both agarose gel electrophoresis and specific absorbance measurements using the NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific).
[0099] Prior to sequencing, genetic identities of isolated endophyte strains were confirmed using endophyte specific SSR markers.
[0100] Paired-end library preparation and sequencing
[0101] Genomic DNA was fragmented in a Covaris instrument (Woburn, Mass., USA) to an average size of 100-900 bp.
[0102] For the RGT18 endophyte DNA sample, paired-end libraries with inserts c. 400 bp in size were prepared using the standard protocol (TruSeq DNA Sample Prep V2 Low Throughput: Illumina Inc., San Diego, USA) with paired-end adaptors. Library quantification was performed using the KAPA library quantification kit (KAPA Biosystems, Boston, USA). Paired-end libraries were pooled according to the attached adaptors and sequence analysed using the HiSeq2000 platform (Illumina) following the standard manufacturer's protocol, RGT18, was sequenced in September 2012.
[0103] For AR37 endophyte DNA, paired-end libraries with inserts c. 400 bp in size were prepared using the standard protocol (Nextera DNA Library Preparation Kit: Illumina Inc., San Diego, USA) with paired-end adaptors. Library quantification was performed using the KAPA library quantification kit (KAPA Biosystems, Boston, USA). Paired-end libraries were pooled according to the attached adaptors and sequence analysed using the MiSeq platform (Illumina) following the standard manufacturer's protocol. The AR37 isolate was sequenced in September 2012.
[0104] All generated sequence reads were quality controlled by filtering and trimming of reads based on quality using a custom Python script, which calculates quality statistics, and stores trimmed reads in several fastq files.
[0105] 2.2. SNP Variation Between AR37 and RGT18
[0106] 2.2.1. AR37 Reference Genome
[0107] A reference genome for AR37 was assembled using SOAPdenovo. A total of 9,604,168 paired-end reads generated using Illumina sequencing technology were assembled to generate a reference genome with 19982 scaffold sequences (Table 2). To minimise ‘N’s present in the assembly ‘command-line resolve’ was used, thus generating the AR37 resolved reference genome.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Sequencing statistics for the AR37 reference genome Sequence statistic Length (bp) Size_includeN 31354167 Size_withoutN 29768040 Scaffold_Num 19982 Mean_Size 1569 Median_Size 115 Longest_Seq 151941 Shortest_Seq 100 Singleton_Num 13980 Average_length_of_break(N)_in_scaffold 79
[0108] 2.2.2 Mapping Reads to the AR37 Reference Genome
[0109] For read mapping to reference sequences, raw fastq sequences generated by the Illumina sequencers were trimmed and quality filtered using the Gydle ‘nuclear’ program in filter mode. The settings used trims reads to a minimum length of 50 bp having greater than Phred score equivalent of 20 and removed Illumina adapters. Reads were mapped to the AR37 reference genome using the Gydle ‘nuclear’ program in search mode. The settings used were Minimum length (L) of High Scoring Pairs 50, Sensitivity (s—minimum consecutive identities within a HSP) 25, K-mer size (k) used for search, 13 Mismatches allowed (m) 6, and—random-best (Reports a single hit randomly selected among the best hits).
[0110] AR37 and RGT18 reads were mapped to the AR37 reference genome using Gydle to generate a gym file. These were generated from the ‘nuclear’ aligned reads using the Gydle ‘gym-build’ program. SNPs were identified using the Gydle program findsnp which uses the gym file as an input. Settings for findsnp were min-coverage 2 (i.e. at least 2 DNA reads had to cover the base of interest) and a min-allele-frequency of 80% (i.e. a base different to the reference had to be seen in a least 80% of the reads covering that base) and min-allele-count 2 (to count SNPs in contigs with unresolved repeats per strain). SNPs were then further filtered such that: 1) SNPs with a minimum allele frequency >80% were excluded when comparing AR37 (reference) v AR37 (reads); 2) contigs had to be greater than 999 bp; and 3) less than 20 minimum-allele-count 2 AR37 (reference) v AR37 (reads) SNPs allowed per contig.
[0111] Using this approach, the inventors identified 817 SNPs, with an average coverage (sequence read depth) of 18×, which differentiate clearly between AR37 and RGT18 (
Example 3: Generation of Novel Host-Endophyte Associations
[0112] Lolium perenne ryegrass-endophyte associations were generated by inoculation using the ‘cut and stuff’ method [12]. Infected plants were identified 6-8 weeks post inoculation using strain specific DNA-based diagnostics to confirm endophyte presence and identity. A total of 154 novel Lolium perenne ryegrass-endophyte associations were generated (Table 3).
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Variety-endophyte associations generated via endophyte inoculation into seedling meristem. Host Endophyte Number of variety strain genotypes STELLAR RGT15 44 STELLAR RGT18 44 RGAS1137 RGT15 30 RGAS1137 RGT18 36 Total 154
Example 4: Vegetative Stability of Endophytes
[0113] Vegetative stability of the associations was assessed six monthly, over a 24-month period (Table 4). Three or more tiller samples (c. 0.5 cm from the base) were harvested from each plant after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months growth in the field. DNA was extracted from freeze dried samples using the MagAttract Plant DNA kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Each sample was analysed for endophyte strain presence and identity using strain specific DNA-based diagnostics.
[0114] Table 3 summarises the number of endophyte positive plants identified 6, 12, 18 and 24 months following successful infection determined at 6 weeks post inoculation. Once novel Lolium perenne ryegrass-endophyte associations are established they remain stable. Further, endophyte strain RGT18 exhibited higher vegetative stability compared to strain RGT15. However, this could also have been due to the varietal-endophyte symbiosis occurring between this endophyte and the host variety, but also the inventors also believe could be due to the compatibility/marriage ability of the RGT18 endophyte with a host grass.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Vegetative stability of variety-endophyte associations. Endophyte infected plants were identified at 6 weeks post inoculation, followed by 6-monthly assessments of association stability. Host variety + Endophyte strain Inoculated Stellar + Stellar + RGAS1137 + RGAS1137 + RGT15 RGT18 RGT15 RGT18 Total 6 weeks Endophyte 44/47 44/44 30/30 36/36 154/157 detected Vegetative 94% 100% 100% 100% stability 6 months Endophyte 35/44* 37/42* 25/30* 33/34 130/150 detected Vegetative 79.5% 88.1% 83.3% 97.1% stability 12 months Endophyte 36/45 40/43 23/31* 28/34 127/153 detected Vegetative 80.0% 93.0% 74.2% 82.4% stability 18 months Endophyte 36/45 39/43 24/32 30/34 141/154 detected Vegetative 80.0% 90.7% 75.0% 88.2% stability 24 months Endophyte 37/45 40/43 23/32 28/33* 134/153 detected Vegetative 82.2% 93.0% 71.9% 84.8% stability *Where total plants tested is lower than the number of plants in the field, some plants were either not tested or deceased.
Example 5: Intergenerational Stability
[0115] The intergenerational stability of the endophytes was assessed in seed generated via pollen cloud experimentation. Analysis was performed using a bulked seed approach whereby 10 seeds were pooled to form 1 sample. DNA extraction was performed using the DNeasy 96 plant DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for each seed line. Each sample was analysed for endophyte strain presence and identity using strain specific DNA-based diagnostics.
[0116] Intergenerational stability, measured as transmission of endophyte to seed, showed endophyte strain RGT18 exhibits higher stability compared to strain RGT15 (Table 5). Variation for intergenerational stability was also observed between varieties; host variety RGAS1137 transmits endophyte at a higher frequency compared to STELLAR (Table 5).
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Intergenerational stability of variety-endophyte associations, measured as transmission of endophyte to seed. Endo- Endo- Endo- Total Inter- Host phyte phyte phyte genotypes generational variety strain detected negative tested stability STELLAR RGT15 40 11 51 78% STELLAR RGT18 39 5 44 89% RGAS1137 RGT15 30 6 36 83% RGAS1137 RGT18 35 1 36 97% Total 144 23 167
Example 6: Alkaloid Profiling
[0117] The alkaloid profiles (ergovaline, peramine and janthitrems) of the associations were assessed over a growing season under field conditions to gain insight into seasonal fluctuations and presence of alkaloids.
[0118] 6.1 Methods
[0119] Sample Harvest
[0120] Plant material for alkaloid analysis was harvested approximately 5 cm above ground. Fresh material was packed into paper bags and stored at −80° C. Samples were then freeze dried, ground to a fine powder and stored at 21° C. in the dark.
[0121] Sample Preparation for Alkaloid Analysis
[0122] Freeze-dried and ground Lolium perenne ryegrass-endophyte samples harvested from three different seasonal periods were measured for alkaloid content.
[0123] Plant material (20 mg±0.2 mg) was extracted twice with 1 mL of methanol:water (80:20, v:v) (Merck LiChrosolv >99.9%; MilliQ water). The supernatants were combined and dried using a SpeedVac Concentrator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Savant SPD 2010) at room temperature for approximately 16 h, and reconstituted in 200 μL of methanol:water (80:20, v:v) containing Ergotamine D-tartrate (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, USA) as an internal standard at a concentration of 216 ng/mL.
[0124] For alkaloid quantitation, peramine nitrate (BDG Synthesis, Wellington, NZ) and ergovaline were used to construct concentration curves from 1 to 2000 ng/mL (peramine and ergovaline) in matrix (endophyte free Lolium perenne ryegrass plant).
[0125] LCMS Parameters
[0126] HPLC Analysis
[0127] Extracts were analysed using a 100 mm×2.1 mm Themo Hypersil Gold 1.9 μm HPLC column fitted to a Thermo Fischer Scientific Vanquish liquid chromatograph (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Bremen). The compounds were detected with a Thermo Fisher QExactive Plus mass spectrometer (Waltham, Mass., USA; Thermo, Bremen, Germany), operating in the ESI mode with a HESI probe for positive data acquisition.
[0128] Mass Spectrometry Analysis
[0129] The sample extract (3 μL) was assessed in FT positive mode over a mass range of 80-1200 amu with resolution set at 35,000. Typical mass accuracy for the alkaloids was 3-5 ppm. Relative quantitation (expressed as peak area) were determined for epoxy-janthitrems I to IV (
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Targeted LCMS/MS analysis of epoxy-janthitrem I-IV indicating accurate masses (m/z), retention times (RT) and MSn fragmentation data (LC-MS/MS) which were acquired in positive ionisation mode [M + H] using a Thermo Fisher Q-Exactive Plus orbitrap mass spectrometer. Accurate mass and MSn fragmentation results were compared with theoretical masses and fell within the range of 5 ppm difference (Delta ppm). Epoxy- Epoxy- Epoxy- Epoxy- janthitrem janthitrem janthitrem janthitrem Metabolite I II III IV m/z [M + H] 646.3735 670.4076 672.4230 714.4341 RT (min) 11.08 12.24 12.31 12.36 Product 1 222.1277 222.1275 222.1274 222.1278 ion: 2 280.1696 280.1692 280.1692 280.1694 LC-MS/ 3 588.3320 612.3676 614.3833 656.3934 MS 4 631.3459 655.3814 657.3969 699.4081 Chemical C39 H52 C42 H56 C42 H58 C44 H60 Formula O7 N O6 N O6 N O7 N [M + H] Theoretical 646.3738 670.4102 672.4259 714.4364 Mass [M + H] Delta (ppm) −0.5 −3.8 −4.3 −3.3
[0130] 6.2 RGT15
[0131] STELLAR-RGT15 and RGAS1137-RGT15 were measured for peramine and ergovaline production in spring, summer and winter. Lolitrem B was not observed in any variety-RGT15 associations.
[0132] Generally, higher average concentrations of peramine and ergovaline were observed in summer compared to spring and winter (Table 7). STELLAR-RGT15 associations exhibit less seasonal variation in peramine and ergovaline concentrations compared to RGAS1137-RGT15 associations. This higher concentration exhibited in summer is very positive in providing high levels of insect resistance at a time of the year when insect presence and lifecycles are at their peak in pastoral systems.
[0133] A wide range in alkaloid production was observed within each population (
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Seasonal averages for ergovaline and peramine production for Lolium perenne ryegrass-endophyte associations. Number of Average Average genotypes ergovaline peramine Association Season measured (mg/kg) (mg/kg) STELLAR-RGT15 Spring 42 0.28 4.85 RGAS1137-RGT15 Spring 26 0.12 2.34 Banquet-Endo5 Spring 4 0.03 3.10 Bealey -LE Spring 4 0.01 1.30 TROJAN-NEA2 Spring 7 0.01 1.66 Alto-SE Spring 7 0.03 8.79 STELLAR-RGT15 Summer 42 0.77 5.98 RGAS1137-RGT15 Summer 26 0.70 5.07 Banquet-Endo5 Summer 4 0.43 5.07 Bealey -LE Summer 4 0.00 1.30 TROJAN-NEA2 Summer 7 0.16 2.23 Alto-SE Summer 7 0.58 17.04 STELLAR-RGT15 Winter 36 0.27 2.51 RGAS1137-RGT15 Winter 25 0.13 1.26 Banquet-Endo5 Winter 4 0.07 1.72 Bealey -LE Winter 4 0.00 1.54 TROJAN-NEA2 Winter 14 0.04 1.41 Alto-SE Winter 4 0.09 4.27 To note: the ergovaline levels exhibited in RGT15 were at optimum levels for suppressing insects but not at a level to cause animal effects.
[0134] 6.3 RGT18
[0135] STELLAR-RGT18 and RGAS1137-RGT18 were measured for epoxy-janthitrems I-IV production in spring, summer and winter (Table 8).
[0136] A wide range in alkaloid production was observed within each population (
[0137] Lower average concentrations of epoxy-janthitrem I were observed in spring and winter compared to summer. Again this is positive, in that in pastoral systems have higher insect pressures exhibited in summer, than in cooler times of the year.
[0138] The production of epoxy-janthitrem I and its variants (epoxy-janthitrems II-IV) in the summer were also measured (
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Seasonal averages for janthitrem I production for Lolium perenne ryegrass-endophyte associations Number of genotypes Average janthitrem I Association Season measured (arbitrary units) STELLAR-RGT18 Spring 43 100116 RGAS1137-RGT18 Spring 38 22054 SAMSON-AR37 Spring 5 0 STELLAR RGT18 Summer 43 6268565 RGAS1137-RGT18 Summer 38 2677393 SAMSON-AR37 Summer 5 434659 Alto-AR37 Summer 6 538814 STELLAR RGT18 Winter 36 42794 RGAS1137-RGT18 Winter 32 4473 SAMSON-AR37 Winter 8 0
TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 The proportion of epoxy-janthitrems I-IV (%) measured in Lolium perenne ryegrass-endophyte associations during the summer season. Proportion of epoxy-janthitrems I-IV (%) epoxy- epoxy- epoxy- epoxy- janthitrem janthitrem janthitrem janthitrem Association Season I II III IV RGAS1137- Summer 66.61 6.91 23.38 3.10 RGT18 STELLAR- Summer 79.96 4.78 13.65 1.61 RGT18 SAMSON- Summer 57.08 0.00 42.92 0.00 AR37 Alto-AR37 Summer 76.30 10.36 9.89 3.45
[0139] The specific genetic differences of RGT18 genotype over AR37 are detailed in the 817 sequences of the Sequence Listing accompanying this specification and as also depicted in
Example 7—Evaluation of Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne) Lines for Resistance/Tolerance to Adult Black Beetle (Heteronychus arator) Feeding
[0140] This example details the results of a laboratory screening (choice test) of diploid ryegrass lines to test for resistance/tolerance to adult black beetle (Heteronychus arator) feeding. Black beetle is considered one of the two key pastoral pests in New Zealand along with Argentine stem weevil.
[0141] The grass/endophyte combinations (lines) tested were: [0142] RGAS1137 RGT18 [0143] SAMSON Nil (control) [0144] SAMSON SE (control) [0145] TROJAN NEA2 (comparator) [0146] SAMSON AR37 (comparator) [0147] RGAS1137 RGT15
[0148] Grass tillers were counted on each entry (plant) at Day 0 immediately before the introduction of the adult black beetle. At days 10, 15, 21 post establishment (DPE10, DPE15, DPE21) assessments were made identifying and counting damaged tillers and assessing plant vigour. Plant vigour was scored on a Likert Scale (1 least vigour to 5 most vigour).
[0149] Analysis of the results was based on the tiller counts (total, healthy and damaged) and the vigour of plants, being the difference between the Day 0 score and later assessments. Plant vigour is an interpretation of a plant's ability to withstand feeding damage and the effects of adult black beetle test biting.
[0150] Key Results [0151] Plant vigour at DPE0 for all lines was assessed as being a 5—(range 1-5). [0152] At DPE10, the damaged tiller count mean for SAMSON Nil (mean 16.4 or 47%) was significantly different (higher) than the balance of the entries (p<0.01). The vigour score mean for SAMSON Nil was 2.6, which was lower than the mean for the balance of the entries (overall mean 4.7). The results for SAMSON Nil were consistent with severe black beetle feeding damage. [0153] At DPE10 the damaged tiller count means for the balance of the entries were not significantly different from each other. [0154] While there were significant differences in mean tiller counts between lines when the assay was started, the results of the assay are conclusive with respect to the poor performance of SAMSON Nil.
[0155] The methodologies and results from a study of feeding choices of black beetle (Heteronychus arator) under laboratory conditions is outlined below. The feeding choices were diploid perennial ryegrass (Lolium perennes) varieties containing a range of endophytes (Acremonium loliae). The primary objective of the study was to measure adult black beetle feeding choices.
[0156] Methods
[0157] Adult Black Beetle Collection and Maintenance
[0158] In April, 200×75 mm diameter pitfall traps were placed in sheep and beef pasture (with a history of black beetle damage) in Tahuna, Waikato, to trap adult black beetle. The traps were emptied daily until a total of 200 black beetle were collected (90 were required for experimental purposes).
[0159] In preparation for the experiment the black beetles were contained individually in cube trays enabling monitoring of individual insects, isolation in case of disease, and preventing combat injury. The beetles were transferred to clean containers every second day and provided with fresh carrot for feeding. The black beetles were maintained at ambient temperatures and not fed for two days prior to entry into the assay.
[0160] Choice Test Set-Up
[0161] Six (6) perennial rye grass seedling types of diploid seed-lines and endophyte selections (Table 10) were received from Seed Force, Christchurch, where they had been grown from seed in planter trays. All plants had been tested for endophyte using the tissue print immunoblot method. The plants were well-grown; all lines had large numbers of healthy tillers.
[0162] To prepare the experiment representative seedlings of each type (entries) were planted equidistant apart (8 cm) in a sandy loam soil (depth 10 cm), within the margins of galvanised sheet iron ring (height 15 cm diameter 32 cm). Plant position in each ring was randomised, and positions were labelled. There were 15 replications of each entry (i.e. 15 rings). The rings were covered with insect netting suspended 15 cm above the soil surface.
TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Entries into adult black beetle feeding assay Entry RGAS1137 RGT18 SAMSON Nil SAMSON SE TROJAN NEA2 SAMSON AR37 RGAS1137 RGT15
[0163] The experiment was maintained in a screen house at ambient temperatures and checked daily to ensure the soil moisture was adequate and that insect containment integrity was maintained.
[0164] Assessments
[0165] The tiller counts and baseline vigour scores for each plant were recorded prior to the introduction of the adult black beetles (Day 0, Assessment 1). The vigour score is a relative score for all plants in the trial on a Likert Scale of 1 (least vigour) to 5 (most vigour). Vigour characteristics were growth form, growth level, leaf colour, and appearance. The plants were then trimmed to 3 cm and adult black beetle were released into each ring (replicate) at a ratio of one per test plant (6 black beetles per ring).
[0166] Plants were inspected daily for black beetle adult feeding damage and four assessment made (Table 11) with a final assessment (Day 21, Assessment 4).
TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Assessment type and timing post establishment (introduction of black beetle) Days post Assessment Establishment (DPE) Assessment type 1 0 Vigour score, tiller count 2 10 Vigour score, damaged tiller count 3 15 Vigour score, damaged tiller count 4 21 Vigour score, damaged tiller count, confirm tiller count
[0167] Results
[0168] Initial Tiller Count (DPE0)
[0169] A tiller count prior to the introduction of the black beetle adults provided a baseline. The tiller counts ranged from 10 to 52, with variation across the grass/endophyte combinations (lines) (Table 12). The mean range of was from 13.6 to 35.1.
TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Baseline tiller count RGAS1137 SAMSON SAMSON TROJAN SAMSON RGAS1137 Line RGT18 Nil SE NEA2 AR37 RGT15 Min 14 21 14 10 12 4 Max 45 52 38 27 34 21 Median 31 33 26 15 21 15 Mean 28.0 35.1 25.9 16.3 21.9 13.6
[0170] Ideally the mean number of tillers in each of the lines is sufficiently similar that they could statistically be from the same population. Table 12 and
[0171] Day Zero Initial Vigour Score (DPE0)
[0172] All entries achieved a vigour score of 5 prior to the introduction of the black beetle adults.
[0173] Day 10 Post Establishment (DPE10)
[0174] Plants were tended regularly and visually checked for black beetle damage following planting. On Day 10 there was sufficient damage to undertake a tiller count and vigour scoring.
[0175] Tiller Damage
[0176] At DPE10 damaged tillers were counted and the mean for each calculated—refer Table 13 and
[0177] The mean number of damaged tillers for SAMSON Nil was 16.4 (range 5-30) (Table 13). The next highest level of damage was SAMSON SE, with a mean of 1.6 (range 0-5). The line RGAS1137-RGT15 had the least damage with a mean of 0.2 (range 0-3). The line RGAS1137-RGT18 was similar.
TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 13 DPE10 damaged tiller count RGAS1137 SAMSON SAMSON TROJAN SAMSON RGAS1137 Line RGT18 Nil SE NEA2 AR37 RGT15 Min 0 5 0 0 0 0 Max 3 30 5 2 5 3 Median 0 15 1 0 0 0 Mean 0.3 16.4 1.6 0.6 1.2 0.2
[0178] T-tests of the means of damaged tillers showed that the mean for SAMSON Nil was statistically different from the means for all other lines. The means for all other lines were statistically the same.
[0179] Because SAMSON Nil had a significantly greater number of tillers at DPE0 and had the greatest mean number of damaged tillers a question arose as to whether there was any significance in this relationship. Testing the number of damaged tillers as a proportion of the tiller count at planting confirmed that as a proportion of total tillers at DPE0, SAMSON Nil had a significantly greater mean than other lines (Table 14). The mean proportion across the plots for SAMSON Nil was 0.50, followed by SAMSON SE (0.074), SAMSON AR37 (0.054), TROJAN NEA2 (0.035), RGAS1137 RGT15 (0.011), and RGAS1137 RGT18 (<0.00). Therefore, considering the higher starting number of tillers, we conclude that the mean damaged tillers for SAMSON Nil is statistically different from all other lines.
TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 14 Proportion of damaged tillers at DPE10 RGAS1137 SAMSON SAMSON TROJAN SAMSON RGAS1137 Line RGT18 Nil SE NEA2 AR37 RGT15 Proportion <0.00 0.50 0.074 0.035 0.054 0.011 damaged
[0180] Vigour Scores
[0181] The vigour score is a Likert Scale with 1 is least vigorous and 5 is most vigorous. A zero score represents a dead plant. At the initial planting (DPE0) all plants included in the assay were assessed as having a vigour score of 5.
[0182] At DPE10, SAMSON Nil recorded the lowest mean vigour score of 2.6. No dead plants were recorded—refer Table 15.
TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 15 Vigour scores at DPE10 RGAS1137 SAMSON SAMSON TROJAN SAMSON RGAS1137 Line RGT18 Nil SE NEA2 AR37 RGT15 Min 4 1 3 4 3 4 Max 5 4 5 5 5 5 Median 5 3 5 5 5 5 Mean 4.9 2.6 4.4 4.7 4.5 4.9
[0183] Except for SAMSON Nil (mean vigour score 2.6) the vigour scores (with SE) indicate a high level of vigour across all lines at DPE10 (refer Table 15/
TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 16 Mean damaged tiller counts at DPE10, DPE15, DPE21 RGAS1137 SAMSON SAMSON TROJAN SAMSON RGAS1137 DPE RGT18 Nil SE NEA2 AR37 RGT15 10 0.3 16.4 1.6 0.6 1.2 0.2 15 1.3 22.3 3.5 1.3 3.9 0.3 21 2.0 18.3 5.8 1.9 7.1 0.4
[0184] At DPE15 (refer Table 16/
[0185] At DPE21 (refer Table 16/
TABLE-US-00017 TABLE 17 Summary of mean vigour scores at DPE10, DPE15, DPE21 RGAS1137 SAMSON SAMSON TROJAN SAMSON RGAS1137 DPE RGT18 Nil SE NEA2 AR37 RGT15 10 4.9 2.6 4.4 4.7 4.5 4.9 15 4.6 2.1 3.7 4.4 3.9 4.8 21 4.7 2.0 3.5 4.3 3.6 4.9
[0186] With the exception of RGAS1137 RGT18 and RGAS1137 RGT15 which recorded increases in vigour scores of between DPE 15 and 21, the balance of the entries recorded declines. The vigour score for SAMSON Nil reflects continued feeding attention by the black beetle, despite the fact that 64% (range 10%-90%) of tillers were damaged.
[0187] Conclusion
[0188] Presence of either endophyte RGT15 or RGT18 in host grasses was found to confer better resistance/tolerance to black beetle (Heteronychus arator) feeding compared to nil endophyte varieties.
[0189] The DPE21 results indicate that both RGT15 and RGT18 endophytes confer a better vigour score and thus are more resistant to insect feeding compared to SAMSON Nil, SAMSON SE, TROJAN NEA2 and importantly provide a significant improvement over SAMSON AR37.
Example 8—Evaluation of Presence of RGT15 and RGT18 Infected Varieties of Ryegrass on the Presence of Root Aphid
[0190] Methods
[0191] The effect of perennial ryegrass endophyte on the mortality and fecundity of the mealy grass root aphid, Aploneura lentisci Passerini (Homoptera, Aphididae), was examined using an in vitro bioassay.
[0192] Aphid Diet Preparation
[0193] Roots from a pooled sample of c.100 12-day old seedlings were ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen and suspended in a 20% sucrose/ultrapure water solution. A pooled sample reduces symbiotum-symbiotum variation and provides an indication of the population average.
[0194] Root Aphid Bioassays
[0195] Colonies of root aphids were reared on mature endophyte-free perennial ryegrass plants, in a controlled environment room (CER) maintained at 20±2° C. and 62±5% RH, with a photoperiod of 14 h light and 10 h dark.
[0196] Single adult aphids were placed in 35 mm petri dishes. A 200 μl aliquot of the diet was sandwiched between two layers of parafilm, creating a feeding membrane. Feeding chambers were then inverted so that the aphids sat directly on top of their food source. Feeding chambers were enclosed inside an additional large petri dish with a layer of moistened filter paper to maintain a humid environment. A total of 14 aphids were used for each treatment. Adult mortality, nymph production and nymph survival were monitored for eight days. Single factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significance among the treatments. A 2-tailed t-test assuming unequal variance was used to determine significance between two groups.
[0197] Results
[0198] The number of adults and nymphs surviving on perennial ryegrass-endophyte root-sucrose diet were determined over eight days. The symbiota tested were perennial ryegrass (prg)-SE (with standard endophyte), prg-AR37, prg-NEA2, 1137-RGT15 and 1137-RGT18. Prg-WE (without endophyte) was used as an endophyte-free control (Table 18).
TABLE-US-00018 TABLE 18 The mortality and fecundity of pasture root aphids exposed to a root-sucrose diet derived from perennial ryegrass-endophyte symbiota. The total number and percentage of adults surviving (A), nymphs born (NB) and nymphs surviving (NA) was assessed over eight days. Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Prg-WE.sup.1 A 12 100% 12 100% 12 100% 12 100% 8 64% 5 43% 1 7% 1 7% NB 17 30 40 43 55 55 55 55 NA 17 100% 30 100% 39 98% 40 83% 30 55% 20 36% 4 7% 0 0% Prg-SE A 14 100% 14 100% 11 79% 8 57% 6 43% 4 29% 3 21% 0 0% NB 12 22 28 38 39 39 39 39 NA 12 100% 22 100% 18 64% 20 53% 21 54% 11 28% 1 3% 0 0% Prg- A 14 100% 12 86% 8 57% 6 43% 5 36% 5 36% 0 0% 0 0% AR37 NB 16 28 38 44 46 46 46 46 NA 16 100% 28 100% 37 97% 36 82% 29 63% 11 24% 3 7% 0 0% Prg- A 13 93% 12 86% 11 79% 10 71% 7 50% 4 29% 1 7% 0 0% NEA2 NB 7 14 20 25 27 27 27 27 NA 7 100% 13 93% 17 85% 20 80% 19 70% 9 33% 4 15% 0 0% 1137- A 13 93% 11 79% 11 79% 5 36% 4 29% 3 21% 2 14% 0 0% RGT15 NB 5 13 31 32 31 31 31 31 NA 5 100% 13 100% 28 90% 23 72% 17 55% 10 32% 4 13% 4 13% 1137- A 13 93% 13 93% 13 93% 5 36% 5 36% 5 36% 3 21% 1 7% RGT18 NB 6 20 24 28 28 28 28 28 NA 6 100% 20 100% 20 83% 16 57% 17 61% 15 54% 10 36% 2 7% .sup.1at the beginning of the experiment adult aphids were n = 12 for prg-WE, all other symbiota n = 14
[0199] Adult aphids exposed to prg-WE diets survived longer than those exposed to perennial ryegrass-endophyte symbiota (
[0200] Aphid fecundity, measured as nymph production, ceased at five days (
[0201] Maximum nymph survival was observed at four days (
[0202] Conclusions
[0203] An in vitro bioassay was used to evaluate perennial ryegrass-endophyte symbiota for effectiveness in mealy grass root aphid (Aploneura lentisci) control. Aphids were fed a diet comprising a pooled sample of c.100 symbiota root samples suspended in sucrose. Use of a pooled sample provides an indication of the symbiota average.
[0204] Significant differences in aphid mortality and fecundity were observed when aphids were fed the root-sucrose diet. The presence of an endophyte generally reduced aphid fitness compared to prg-WE. When considering ranking of symbiota for effectiveness in root aphid control RGAS1137-RGT18, RGAS1137-RGT15 and prg-NEA2 overall provided better whole-of-life cycle control than prg-SE and prg-AR37 see Table 18 and
Example 9—Replicated Live Animal Feeding Trials Conducted Summer to Autumn Using Lambs
[0205] Materials and Methods
[0206] Establishment and Pasture Management
[0207] The trial area was sprayed-out, double-disced and power harrowed prior to sowing. Drilling took place on April using a Horsch Drill, the 3 replicates of each treatment were drilled and then the drilled cleaned thoroughly before starting the next treatment. The paddocks, 0.17 hectares (36 m×48 m) in size, were sown as pure swards of perennial ryegrass.
[0208] The target sowing rate was 15 kg/ha of seed, assuming 90% germination and 90% field emergence and rates were adjusted according to seed size, in theory this would achieve a plant population of 520 plants/m.sup.2.
[0209] Weeds were controlled through the winter and spring with applications of 650 mL/ha of Starane for winter application and a combination of Jaguar at 1.5 L/ha and Nortron at 4 L/ha for spring application.
[0210] The trial area received 250 kg/ha of Cropzeal 20N as starter fertiliser before drilling in April 2018 and four applications of SustaiN; 100 kg/ha in September, 100 kg/ha at the end of October, 150 kg/ha at the end of December and 150 kg/ha at the end of January, totaling 500 kg/ha leading up to the trial period.
[0211] The trial was not irrigated. Grazing occurred in common by ewes for three weeks in November/December, with ewes removed on mid-December and again by lambs in January, with the lambs coming off on end of January and the trial area topped to 75 mm height after which point the blocks were fenced into individual paddocks.
[0212] Climate
[0213] The summer of 2019 was hotter and dryer than the 10 year average. Mean air temperature and monthly rainfall from the Lincoln Broadfield EWS Weather Station showed that March of 2019 was on average 1.7° C. warmer than the mean of 2009 to 2019.
TABLE-US-00019 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH 10 Year 10 Year 10 Year 2019 Mean 2019 Mean 2019 Mean Total 36.2 43.7 29.2 41.7 26.8 47.5 Rainfall (mm) Mean Air 18.6 17.3 17.8 17.0 17 15.3 Temperature
[0214] Endophyte Presence
[0215] 50 tiller samples were taken from each paddock and endophyte levels were measured and before further testing were confirmed to be above the 70% threshold for selling commercial seed to the market refer the KASP section and Table 19 below.
[0216] KASP
[0217] Endophyte purity and content testing was performed (44-50 tillers from each sample) from the perennial ryegrass-endophyte lines (3 replicates) were tested.
[0218] DNA was extracted from each line using the MagAttract Plant DNA kit (Qiagen) in an automated workflow with liquid handling platforms (Beckman Coulter). Each DNA sample was genotyped using a strain specific ‘Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR’ (KASP™) genotyping method using diagnostic SNPs. Each plate contained eight positive controls as well as four no template controls (without DNA) for quality control. Each sample was tested for presence of the expected endophyte.
TABLE-US-00020 TABLE 19 Mean Endophyte Presence (%) of treatments Cultivar Endophyte Combination KASP SAMSON AR1 98 STELLAR-RGT18 95 SAMSON SE 99 TROJAN NEA2 83 SAMSON AR37 75 STELLAR-RGT15 73 Note: KASP test provides the most definitive test for level of presence of live endophyte. Commercial levels for live endophyte are a minimum of 70%
[0219] The key controls used for the trials were SAMSON AR1 (Negative control, AR1, nil animal health effects) and SAMSON SE (Positive standard endophyte control).
[0220] Yield for the cultivars detailed in Table 19 was assessed as a function of calculating the number of lambs to be placed into each paddock at the start of the trial. The yield was measured at the mid-point of the trial to ensure enough feed would be available to lambs for the remainder of the trial period. The close range of the final yield measurements (890 to 1134 kg DM/ha) shows that lamb numbers per paddock were well managed and that the assumptions made in the calculations for these were sound.
[0221] Lamb Liveweight Gain
[0222] SAMSON SE had the lowest liveweight gain in weeks 0-2 and varieties 2, 3, 5, 6 and 8 had significantly higher gains than this. There was only one significant difference in weeks 2-4 for liveweight gain.
TABLE-US-00021 TABLE 20 Mean lamb liveweight change (kg/head) for Week 0-2, Week 2-4 and Week 0-4. Mean lamb liveweight change (kg/head) Week 0- Week 2- Week 0- Treatment Week 2 Week 4 Week 4 STELLAR-RGT18 6.1 a 0.6 ab 6.7 a STELLAR-RGT15 5.2 ab 1.1 a 6.3 a SAMSON AR37 6.3 a −0.3 ab 6 ab SAMSON SE 4.4 b 0.1 ab 5.9 ab SAMSON AR1 5.4 ab −0.3 ab 5.1 ab TROJAN NEA2 5.3 ab −0.9 b 4.4 b LSD 5% 1 1 1
[0223] Liveweight gain as a measure of the potential treatment effect is not a useful gauge as it is dependent on the number of lambs per paddock which, in this case, was according to the ETC Protocol minimum lambs/paddock requirement rather than a calculated number of lambs based on dry matter production available.
[0224] Stock and Animal Ethics
[0225] Animal Ethics Approval was sought and granted by the Lincoln University Animal Ethics Approval Committee.
[0226] Trial lambs were sourced from the neighbouring farmer who made available 320 Coopworth x Hampshire cross and straight Coopworth ewe lambs at an average liveweight (unfasted) of 31.3 kg/head. All lambs had been grazed on Lucerne for the three weeks prior to the start of the trial, were freshly shorn the previous week and received a drench prior to going onto the trial. Lambs were allocated to paddocks at random and were weighed prior to going onto the trial.
[0227] Feed Grown
[0228] Yield was assessed by taking 3 strips using a rotary mower to 4 cm from each paddock and drying a sub sample to calculate dry matter percent.
[0229] Several assumptions were made when using yield figures to calculate the number of lambs to be allocated to each paddock: that the predicted dry matter production growth per day during the trial period would be 35 kg DM/ha, that the residual remaining at the end of the trial period would be 800 kg DM/ha and that lamb intake during the trial period would be 1.5 kg DM/ha/head.
[0230] Using these calculations, it was expected that feed would be tight towards the end of the 28 day trial period but 10 lambs per paddock (the ETC Protocol minimum number of lambs/paddock) were applied to all paddocks except three paddocks which had higher yields, these received 12 lambs.
[0231] Yield measurements were also taken using the same method, however the final measurement, at the end of the trial period was taken using a rising plate meter as a rotary mower would not have collected much yield above the 4 cm cutting height.
[0232] Yield was closely monitored and at the mid-point of the trial, those paddocks that had 12 lambs allocated to them had 2 lambs removed as the pasture cover was getting low. The mid-point yield measurement highlighted four other paddocks with low pasture covers (<1000 kg DM/ha). The Biometrician David Baird was consulted and his recommendation was to remove some lambs from each of these paddocks (as opposed to running with all 10 lambs and shortening the trial period for those paddocks), so three lambs were removed to leave seven in each paddock.
[0233] Lamb Liveweights
[0234] Unfasted lamb liveweights were recorded at the start, mid-point and end of the trial period respectively.
[0235] Herbage Alkaloids—See Also Example 10 Below
[0236] Samples for herbage alkaloid analysis were taken using an electric handpiece at the start, mid-point and end of the trial period respectively). Ten areas approximately 20 cm long were cut to ground level and combined from which a sub-sample of 150 grams was collected and stored immediately within layers of ice. Samples were then transferred to a freezer.
[0237] Samples were freeze dried and then referenced under trial codes and forwarded for laboratory analysis.
[0238] Staggers Scoring
[0239] Lambs were assessed using the Keogh Scale (see below) after grazing on paddocks for one week, again after two weeks after which point the scoring occurred twice weekly.
[0240] While operating in the best interests of the trial animals, the Trial Operator removed any lambs from the trial that staggered to the point of falling over (those that registered as a Score 4 or 5 on the Keogh Scale).
[0241] The Trial Operator interpreted a Score 3 to include ‘stiff leg walking’ or ‘knee-walking’ and a Score 4 ‘knee-walking to the point of falling over’.
Keogh (1973 Description of Staggers Symptoms)
[0242] 0—No symptoms [0243] 1—Slight trembling of neck, shoulders, and flank muscles after hard exercise (400 m run). [0244] 2—Marked trembling of neck, shoulders and flank muscles, and shaking of head after hard exercise, but no lack of co-ordination. [0245] 3—Marked trembling of general musculature and head shaking; some lack of co-ordination of movement and impaired vision while running. [0246] 4—Muscle tremors and head shaking after a short run (<30 m) or sudden disturbance; continued exercise elicits a marked lack of co-ordination resulting in a characteristic staggering gait which normally ends with the animal falling down; a short period of moderate to severe muscular spasm follows, after which the animal is able to regain its feet and walk off. [0247] 5—Severe muscle tremors elicited by slight disturbance or exercise (10 m rapid movement) which invariably result in staggering and collapse in a severe tetanic spasm which may last up to 20 min in very bad cases.
[0248] Staggers Results
[0249] Referring to Table 20 above and
[0250] In particular SAMSON SE was significantly higher on the Keogh Scale than all other treatments at the 5% level at the first score (measured 7 days after the start of the trial) and was significantly higher again at the 0.1% level when next measured 10 days later.
[0251] Indeed, the observed staggers in SAMSON SE paddocks was so extreme Score 3 and above that all lambs were removed from the paddocks prior to the conclusion of the trial.
[0252] There were no other significant differences between the remaining 5 treatments as can be seen from the overlapping baseline of their datapoints in Table 20 and
[0253] Conclusion
[0254] It is clear from the above results that RGT15 and RGT 18 endophytes of the present invention present a real-world advantage to SAMSON SE wildtype endophyte symbiont in terms of not sacrificing animal health for any improved reduction in insect related predation over non-symbiont grass.
Example 10—Alkaloid Results
[0255] The results of the herbage alkaloids from the endophyte grass symbionts (treatments) tested as mentioned above are shown in
[0256] As can be seen in
[0257] In
[0258] In
[0259] It is noteworthy, as can be seen from
[0263] Conclusion
[0264] The only grass endophyte symbiont tested which produced significant amounts of lolitrem B was SAMSON SE, importantly neither STELLAR-RGT15 nor STELLA-RGT18 produced lolitrem B.
[0265] It can be seen from the results that STELLAR-RGT15 is an endophyte capable of producing commercial acceptable levels of peramine.
[0266] The results also show that both STELLAR-RGT18 and SAMSON AR37 are the only grass endophyte symbionts which produce epoxy-janthitrem I.
Example 11 Agronomy: Grass Endophyte Symbiont Dry Matter Production Studies
[0267] Materials and Methods
[0268] The Lennox Trial compared dry matter production of RGA1137-RGT18, RGA1137-RGT15, RGA1137 WE, One 50 AR1, and One 50 AR37. The trial location was situated near Ladbrooks, Canterbury with Wakanui clay loam soil. It was a dryland and mow only trial. The randomized complete block having 4 replicates with nutrients being replaced following each harvest based on the mean yield removal. The Waikeria Trial compared dry matter production of STELLAR-RGT18, STELLAR-RGT15, STELLAR AR1, Request AR1, and Request AR37. The trial location was situated in the Waikato region near Te Awamutu with ash (allophanic) soil type. It was a dryland and mow only trial. The randomized complete block having 4 replicates with nutrients being replaced following each harvest based on the mean yield removal. Both trials were harvested when the average dry matter yield was between 2000-2700 kg/ha. Fresh weight was recorded, with a subsample of the fresh herbage dried to provide a dry matter %.
[0269] Results
[0270] Results of the Lennox Trial are shown in Table 21 and
[0271] Results of the Waikeria Trial are shown in Table 22 and
TABLE-US-00022 TABLE 21 Lennox Trial: Average Total Dry Matter Yield (kgDM/ha) by Years Average Total Year Year Year Dry Matter Variety 1 2 3 Yrs 1-3 RGAS1137-RGT18 15,450 12,321 14,426 14,203 RGAS1137-RGT15 14,946 12,778 13,767 13,897 RGAS1137 WE 14,279 11,566 14,219 13,456 One50 AR37 14,357 12,470 12,763 13,183 One50 AR1 14,423 11,705 12,971 13,043 Trial Mean 13,850 11,830 13,399 13,009 LSD (5%) 1,206 1,072.0 1,050.0 611.9 CV % 9.3 5.4 6.6 5.1
TABLE-US-00023 TABLE 22 Waikeria Trial: Average Total Dry Matter Yield (kgDM/ha) by Years Average Total Variety Year 1 Year 2 Dry Matter Yrs 1-2 STELLAR-RGT18 12,212 17,103 14,717 STELLAR-RGT15 11,702 16,797 14,297 SF STELLAR AR1 11,370 16,221 13,910 REQUEST AR37 11,215 16,006 13,683 REQUEST AR1 10,656 15,432 13,111 Trial Mean 11,617 16,282 13,963 LSD (5%) 577.4 773.6 761.7 CV % 6.7 3.3 4.3
[0272] Conclusion
[0273] The results of both the Lennox and Waikeria trials show RGT15 and RGT18 endophytes support better yields over a three year period within the same grass cultivar.
[0274] The invention detailed herein may provide one or more advantages over the prior art endophyte grass symbionts and/or wildtype grasses, or at least offer the public a useful choice.
[0275] The invention as detailed above may also be said broadly to consist in the parts, elements and features referred to or indicated in the specification of the application, individually or collectively, in any or all combinations of two or more of said parts, elements or features.
[0276] Aspects of the present invention have been described by way of example only and it should be appreciated that modifications and additions may be made thereto without departing from the scope thereof as defined in the appended claims.
REFERENCES
[0277] [1] van Zijll de Jong E., Dobrowolski M. P., Bannan N. R., Stewart A. V., Smith K. F., Spangenberg G. C., and Forster J. W., 2008. Global Genetic Diversity of the Perennial Ryegrass Fungal Endophyte Neotyphodium lolii. Crop Science, 48:1487-1501. [0278] [2] Gallagher R. T., White E. P., and Mortimer P. H., 1981. Ryegrass staggers: Isolation of potent neurotoxins lolitrem A and lolitrem B from stagger-producing pastures. N. Z. vet. J. 29:189-190. [0279] [3] Yates S. G., Plattner R. D., and Garner G. B., 1985. Detection of ergopeptine alkaloids in endophyte infected, toxic Ky-31 tall fesue by mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 33: 719-722. [0280] [4] Ball O. J. P., Miles C. O., and Prestidge R. A., 1997. Ergopeptine alkaloids and Neotyphodium lolii-mediated resistance in perennial ryegrass against adult Heteronychus arator (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 90: 1382-1391. [0281] [5] Prestidge R. A. and Gallegher R. T., 1988. Endophyte fungus confers resistance to ryegrass: Argentine stem weevil larval studies. Ecol. Entomol. 13:429-435. [0282] [6] Rowan D. D. and Gaynor D. L., 1986. Isolation of feeding deterrents against Argentine stem weevil from ryegrass infected with endophyte Acremonium loliae. J. Chem. Ecol. 12: 647-658. [0283] [7] Morland Latch G. C., Christensen M. J., Tapper B. A., Easton H. S., Hume D. E., Fletcher L. R. 2000. Ryegrass endophytes. U.S. Pat. No. 6,072,107. [0284] [8] Cameron N. E., 2015. Grass endophyte. U.S. Pat. No. 9,133,434. [0285] [9] Tapper B. A., Cooper B. M., Easton H. S., Fletcher L. R., Hume D. E., Lane G. A., Morland Latch G. C., Lee Pennell C. G., Popay A. J., Christensen M. J., 2011. Grass endophytes. U.S. Pat. No. 7,976,857. [0286] [10] Finch S. C., Wilkins A. L., Popay A. J., Babu J. V., Tapper B. A., Lane G. A. (2010). “The isolation and bioactivity of epoxy-janthitrems from AR37 endophyte-infected perennial ryegrass,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Fungal Endophytes of Grasses, eds Young C. A., Aiken G., McCulley R. L., Strickland J., Schardl C. L., editors. (Lexington, Ky.). [0287] [11] Hennessy L. M. (2015). Epoxy-Janthitrems, Effects of Temperature on in Planta Expression and their Bioactivity against Porina Larvae. Masters thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton. [0288] [12] Latchs G., and Christensen M. 1985. Artificial infection of grasses with endophytes. Annals of Applied Biology: An International Journal of the AAB., 107(1), 17-24. [0289] [13] Keogh, R. G. 1973. Induction and prevention of ryegrass staggers in grazing sheep. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1: 55-57.