A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LAUNCHING MULTIPLE SATELLITES FROM A LAUNCH VEHICLE

Abstract

A system (100) and method (300) for launching multiple satellites from a launch vehicle is provided. The system includes a mechanical structure (102) which has one or more mounting means (104A-F), a control unit (106) for controlling the one or more mounting means for positioning and separating the multiple satellites in the mechanical structure, an image capturing system for monitoring the positioning of each satellite in the mechanical structure. The mounting means are adapted to position the satellites in axial, inclined and radial separations at a distance to ensure that each satellite will not come in contact with each other in short duration as well as long duration of orbit evolution.

Claims

1. A system for launching multiple satellites from a launch vehicle (100) comprising: a mechanical structure (102) which comprises a plurality of mounting means (104A-F); a control unit (106) for controlling said plurality of mounting means for positioning and separating said multiple satellites in said mechanical structure; an image capturing system for monitoring the positioning of each satellite in said mechanical structure; and wherein said mounting means are adapted to position the satellites in axial, inclined and radial separations at a distance to ensure that each satellite will not come in contact with each other in short duration as well as long duration of orbit evolution.

2. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein each of said plurality of mounting means are adapted to position one or more satellites.

3. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein first set of mounting means are arranged in said axial separation and second set of mounting means are arranged in said inclined separation and third set of mounting means are arranged in said radial separation.

4. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said distance between the separation of satellites are determined based on maximum collision probability (P.sub.max) which is derived from the following equation: $P_{\max }=\frac{4}{\pi s}{\left(\frac{R_s}{R_{\min }}\right)}^2$ wherein R.sub.min be the minimum distance between them and R.sub.s is the effective collision radius.

5. A method for deploying and launching multiple satellites using a mechanical structure at a launching vehicle, said method comprising the steps of: positioning said multiple satellites in a plurality of mounting means provided in said mechanical structure, wherein said mounting means are arranged at a distance to satisfy the long term collision free requirement based on a maximum collision probability (P.sub.max); separating first set of satellites in axial direction and second set of satellites in radial direction; dividing second set of satellites into two groups based on velocity direction and anti-velocity direction; re-orienting the stage and separating the satellites grouped under any one of said two groups with a small roll rate between 0.20 to 0.35 degrees to ensure separation of satellites in an orbital plane along velocity and anti-velocity directions; launching said first set of satellites arranged in axial direction, part of said second set of satellites arranged in radial direction and remaining part of said second set of satellites arranged in inclined direction from said launch vehicle to separate them with appropriate in-track delta v distribution.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein a video imaging system is appropriately mounted and positioned which can capture all separation events.

7. The method as claimed in claim 5, wherein said separating step ensures that all the satellites can be separated at optimal attitude to meet the desired minimum distance for all separation.

8. The method as claimed in claim 5, wherein said re-orienting step a roll rate controllability is achieved between 0.20 to 0.35 degrees to get the desired angle and direction of separation in the orbital plane.

9. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the roll-rate and the timing of the separation is selected so as to achieve the direction of separation in the orbital plane to provide the desired in-track delta-v difference between the two separations to ensure that the two satellites separating do not come in contact with each other on short period as well as long period of orbit evolution.

10. The method as claimed in claim 5, wherein said separating step ensures no interaction between plume of upper stage control thruster and separating satellites.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCOMPANYING DRAWINGS

[0020] The advantages and features of the invention will become more clearly apparent from the following description which refers to the accompanying drawings given as non-restrictive examples only and in which:

[0021] FIG. 1 illustrates a system for launching multiple satellites from a launch vehicle in accordance to the embodiment herein;

[0022] FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic representation showing minimum distance between two satellites in accordance to the embodiment herein; and

[0023] FIG. 3 illustrates a flow diagram for deploying and launching multiple satellites using a mechanical structure at a launching vehicle in accordance to the embodiment herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0024] The present invention will be described herein below with reference to the accompanying drawings. A system and method for launching multiple satellites from a launch vehicle is described herein.

[0025] The following description is of exemplary embodiment of the invention only, and is not limit the scope, applicability or configuration of the invention. Rather, the following description is intended to provide a convenient illustration for implementing various embodiments of the invention. As will become apparent, various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of the structural/operational features described in these embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth herein. It should be appreciated that the description herein may be adapted to be employed with alternatively configured devices having different shaped, components, and the like and still fall within the scope of the present invention. Thus the detailed description herein is presented for purposes of illustration only and not of limitation.

[0026] FIG. 1 illustrates a system 100 for launching multiple satellites from a launch vehicle in accordance to the embodiment herein. The system 100 includes a mechanical structure 102 which has one or more mounting means 104A-F, a control unit 106 for controlling the one or more mounting means for positioning and separating the multiple satellites in the mechanical structure, an image capturing system (not shown) for monitoring the positioning of each satellite in the mechanical structure. The mounting means are adapted to position the satellites in axial, inclined and radial separations at a distance to ensure that each satellite will not come in contact with each other in short duration as well as long duration of orbit evolution. The mounting means is adapted to position one or more satellites. First set of mounting means are arranged in the axial separation and second set of mounting means are arranged in the inclined separation and third set of mounting means are arranged in the radial separation.

[0027] The multiple satellite deployment missions pose challenges for configuring the mounting and designing the satellite separation sequence to avoid re-contact possibility as there will be a large number of bodies corresponding to satellites and spent stages. The mounting configuration will have the following constraints. [0028] 1. Axial separation for some satellites, inclined separation for some other satellites and also radial separations for a bunch of other satellites. [0029] 2. Mounting of radially separating satellites to ensure no interaction between plume of upper stage control thruster and separating satellite. [0030] 3. No part of the separation system used to deploy a satellite shall block the path of the satellites separating subsequently.

[0031] The satellites separation sequence is designed. with following mission constraints in addition to the above with respect to mounting requirement. [0032] 1. The minimum distance between all body pairs to satisfy collision probability of 1 in 100000 and positive margin in mounting configuration. [0033] 2. Satellites separating from same sequencer to have minimum of 5 s delay. [0034] 3. Minimum number of re-orientations to be used for the satellites separations. [0035] 4. Minimum time for all satellites separations.

[0036] To achieve collision free long term orbital motion of the satellites, design was carried out first by analytically placing the satellites properly in spatial as well as temporal. Later the time intervals between the satellite injections were tuned by using the full force model for orbital propagations.

[0037] In the present invention, separation of multiple satellites is done in a very short time span (not exceeding 1000s from terminal stage cut off) meeting the probability of collision of 1 in 100000 based on distance between any two pairs of bodies with respect to their deployed sizes. Also separated bodies are having no interaction with plume of upper stage control system. The mission strategy can be explained using a flow chart as shown below.

[0038] A new method is devised to compute the distance between the satellites for any given probability of collision.

Calculations of Safe Re-Contact Distance:

[0039] The characteristic radius of a satellite/upper stage is the radius of sphere circumscribing it. Let r 1 and r2 be the characteristic radii of two satellites considered [Refer FIG. 2] and Rmin be the minimum distance between them and Rs is the effective collision radius (=r1+r2). The maximum collision probability is given as:

[00002]$P_{\max }=\frac{4}{\pi s}{\left(\frac{R_s}{R_{\min }}\right)}^2$

[0040] The collision probability threshold for Space Object Proximity Analysis (SOPA) is 1 in 1000 and for Collision Avoidance (COLA) is 1 in 1,00,000 in the orbital phase. The collision probability threshold for COLA is conservative to account for injection uncertainties, whereas for routine SOPA and SOPA for orbit manoeuvres it is relaxed. The invention provides a novel solution for the separation of multiple satellites with small masses in to a circular orbit.

[0041] For satellites separating with same delta-v, the in-track component of the separation delta-v can be configured by selecting the appropriate direction of separation. For arriving at a systematic separation sequence all the satellites are separated in the orbital plane. The in-track delta-v components are arranged in the desired order (descending or ascending) by selecting the appropriate direction of separation in the orbital plane. For avoiding short term overtaking by the satellites, it is required to have the in-track delta v in the descending order of their magnitude.

[0042] The satellites separating in the opposite direction will always have the time period difference between them except for the case of separation in exactly radial direction. Hence we divide the satellites in two groups, one separating in the velocity direction and the other separating in the anti-velocity direction and solve for sequence timing for one group of the satellites and separate other simultaneously with same timings. A small roll rate between 0.20 to 0.35 deg/s is used to get the desired angle for separation in the orbital plane. The design methodology is used for radial separations only. For axial separation, all the satellites are separated at fixed optimal attitude to meet the desired minimum distance.

[0043] After separation of the satellites in axial direction, the reorientation of upper stage is done to ensure separation of other satellites in the orbital plane along velocity and anti-velocity directions. The differential velocity between the two separating pairs is ensured by separating them in velocity and anti-velocity directions. Vehicle longitudinal axis is aligned with orbit normal direction and then rotated with rate between 0.20 to 0.35 deg/s and the timing of the separation is selected so as to achieve the direction of separation in the orbital plane to provide in-track delta-v difference between the two separations in the same direction. This ensures that the two satellites separating do not come in contact with each other on short period as well as long period of orbit evolution.

[0044] The sequence works even if the vehicle is not rotated, due to rotation of the velocity vector from 0 to 360 degree in one orbit. The direction of the satellites separation will change naturally with respect to local plane providing effect of natural rolling of the vehicle (assuming vehicle longitudinal axis is aligned with orbit normal vector) with appropriate rate for circular orbit. This rate is additionally available for intentional roll rate case also. Due to very small rate, this will take a longer duration for separations. The method also includes taking visuals of all the satellite separation events using cameras positioned appropriately.

[0045] For example, The mounting of 25 Quad Packs (containing 101 satellites), two ISRO Nanosats and main satellite were arranged with symmetry about the vehicle yaw axis, such that none of the separating satellites would not enter the control system plume by virtue of mounting itself. Then the minimum distance between each pair of satellite is computed using a sphere encompassing the maximum deployed size of each satellite to ensure 1 in 100000 probability of collision. The separation sequence is designed with an intentional roll rate to separate the two radially separating satellites simultaneously in velocity and anti-velocity directions with finite time gap thereby ensuring that the gaps are increasing in first 10 orbits for all the 5460 pairs of objects.

[0046] FIG. 3 illustrates a flow diagram 300 for deploying and launching multiple satellites using a mechanical structure at a launching vehicle in accordance to the embodiment herein. In step 302, the multiple satellites in a one or more mounting means provided in the mechanical structure are positioned, wherein the mounting means are arranged at a distance to satisfy the long term collision free requirement based on a maximum collision probability (Pmax). In step 304, first set of satellites in axial direction and second set of satellites in radial direction are separated from the multiple satellites. In step 306, second set of satellites into two groups based on velocity direction and anti-velocity direction is divided. In step 308, the satellites grouped under any one of the two groups with a small roll rate between 0.20 to 0.35 degrees to ensure separation of satellites in an orbital plane along velocity and anti-velocity directions are re-oriented and separated. In step 310, launching the first set of satellites arranged in axial direction, part of the second set of satellites arranged in radial direction and remaining part of the second set of satellites arranged in inclined direction from the launch vehicle to separate them with appropriate in-track delta v distribution. The video imaging system is appropriately mounted and positioned which can capture all separation events. The separating step ensures that all the satellites can be separated at optimal attitude to meet the desired minimum distance for all separation. The re-orienting step a roll rate controllability is achieved between 0.20 to 0.35 degrees to get the desired angle and direction of separation in the orbital plane. The roll-rate and the timing of the separation is selected so as to achieve the direction of separation in the orbital plane to provide the desired in-track delta-v difference between the two separations to ensure that the two satellites separating do not come in contact with each other on short period as well as long period of orbit evolution. The separating step ensures no interaction between plume of upper stage control thruster and separating satellites.

[0047] The present embodiment facilitates the system and methodology for safe deployment of multiple satellites in short duration of time. The method comprises of designing a mounting configuration for multiple satellites to ensure safe separation and configuring the separation sequence with manoeuvring to ensure clean separation of multiple satellites, safe movement between the separated satellites and prevent any interaction between the satellites and launch vehicle control system plume during separation. The satellites separation direction is finalized such that after separation they will have no possibility of entering the control system plume. Once this is finalized the proximity analysis is done to have sufficient gap between the separating satellites by adjusting the time of separation. The method also includes capturing video images of all the satellite separation events using video imaging systems positioned appropriately. The technical advantages of the present embodiment are as follows: [0048] 1. Achieved axial separation of the first batch of satellites to be separated, inclined separation of the second batch of satellites to be separated and radial separation of the remaining satellites. [0049] 2. It is ensured that all satellite separations were completed within the short mission duration with 1 in 100000 probability of collision after stage cut-off as against the normal sequence without the manoeuvre. [0050] 3. Minimum time delay is ensured for the satellites separating from same sequencer. [0051] 4. Minimum numbers of re-orientations are used for the satellite separations. [0052] 5. It is ensured that all separated satellites have an ever increasing gap among themselves in the first 10 orbits.

[0053] It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reading and understanding the above description. Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be recognized that the invention is not limited to the embodiments described, but can be practiced with modification and alteration within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than a restrictive sense. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.