METHOD FOR PREPARING NANOSPONGE-STRUCTURED GRAPHENE DOT-PALLADIUM HYBRID, AND NANOSPONGE-STRUCTURED GRAPHENE DOT-PALLADIUM HYBRID PREPARED THEREBY

Abstract

Disclosed are a method for preparing a graphene dot-palladium hybrid having a nanosponge structure that includes reducing a palladium precursor in the presence of a carbon dot and sodium bromide, and a graphene dot-palladium hybrid catalyst prepared according to the method. The nanosponge structure of the graphene dot-palladium hybrid is encapsulated by a graphene dot. The carbon dot is doped with at least one heteroatom selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, sulfur, phosphorus, and boron.

Claims

1. A method for preparing a graphene dot-palladium hybrid having a nanosponge structure, the method comprising reducing a palladium precursor in the presence of a carbon dot and sodium bromide.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the nanosponge structure of the graphene dot-palladium hybrid is encapsulated by a graphene dot.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the carbon dot is doped with at least one heteroatom selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, sulfur, phosphorus, and boron.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein 1 to 200 parts by weight of the carbon dot and 50 to 2000 parts by weight of the sodium bromide are used with respect to 100 parts by weight of the palladium precursor.

5. A graphene dot-palladium hybrid catalyst having a nanosponge structure.

6. The graphene dot-palladium hybrid catalyst according to claim 5, wherein the graphene dot-palladium hybrid has the nanosponge structure encapsulated by a graphene dot.

7. The graphene dot-palladium hybrid catalyst according to claim 5, wherein the graphene dot is doped with at least one heteroatom selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, sulfur, phosphor, and boron.

8. A catalyst electrode comprising the graphene dot-palladium hybrid catalyst of claim 5.

9. The method according to claim 2, wherein the carbon dot is doped with at least one heteroatom selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, sulfur, phosphorus, and boron.

10. The method according to claim 2, wherein 1 to 200 parts by weight of the carbon dot and 50 to 2000 parts by weight of the sodium bromide are used with respect to 100 parts by weight of the palladium precursor.

11. The graphene dot-palladium hybrid catalyst according to claim 6, wherein the graphene dot is doped with at least one heteroatom selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, sulfur, phosphor, and boron.

12. A catalyst electrode comprising the graphene dot-palladium hybrid catalyst of claim 6.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0024] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating the preparation methods for nano-structures according to the example of the present invention and comparative examples;

[0025] FIG. 2 presents HR-TEM images and XRD spectra of a Gdot-Pd hybrid prepared by the example of the present invention and nanoparticles of the comparative examples;

[0026] FIG. 3 presents HR-TEM images and XRD spectra showing the structural characteristics of the Gdot-Pd hybrid;

[0027] FIG. 4 presents CV curves showing the electrochemical characteristics of the Gdot-Pd hybrid and a graph of the effective surface area (ECSA, electrochemical surface area) calculated from the CV curves;

[0028] FIG. 5 presents Nyquist plots using an electrochemical impedance spectroscope (EIS);

[0029] FIG. 6 presents graphs showing the electrochemical catalytic characteristics of the Gdot-Pd hybrid for the hydrogen evolution reaction; and

[0030] FIG. 7 presents graphs showing the electrochemical catalytic characteristics of the Gdot-Pd hybrid for the methanol oxidation reaction.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0031] Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the following examples, which are given as exemplary illustrations for the understanding of the contents and the scope of the technical conceptions of the present invention and not intended to limit and modify the technical scope of the present invention. But, it is apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made within the scope of the technical conceptions of the present invention based on the exemplary illustrations.

EXAMPLES

Example 1: Preparation of Graphene Dot-Palladium Hybrid

[0032] (1) Preparation of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Dot-Palladium Hybrid

[0033] Preparation of Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dot (Cdot)

[0034] Nitrogen-doped carbon dot (N-Cdot) was prepared according to the method described in Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2013, 52, 7800. Briefly, 40 g of citric acid and 1.24 g of glycine were dissolved in 10 ml of DI water. The solution was heated at 70° C. for 12 hours to evaporate the solvent, and the residue was put into an autoclave and heated at a rate of 4.3° C./min to undergo a hydrothermal reaction at 200° C. for 3 hours. The product obtained in the form of black syrup was neutralized with a 1.0M NaOH solution and diluted with 100 ml of DI water. The diluted solution was dialyzed against secondary DI water through a dialysis membrane (5 kDa MWCO). The dialysis solution was freeze-dried to obtain a yellowish Cdot. According to the TEM analysis, the N-Cdot thus obtained had a spherical form with a diameter of 1.5 to 2.5 nm.

[0035] Preparation of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Dot-Palladium (Gdot-Pd) Hybrid

[0036] 29 mg of the nitrogen-doped Cdot prepared above, 400 mg of sodium bromide (NaBr, Sigma-Aldrich), and 34 mg of potassium tetrachloropalladate (K.sub.2PdCl.sub.4, Sigma-Aldrich) were put into a 100 ml round flask and subjected to ultrasonic waves for 20 minutes. Then, 20 ml of an aqueous solution of 28.4 mM L-ascorbic acid (L-aa, Sigma-Aldrich) was rapidly added to the mixed solution. Once the color of the clear reactant solution turned from yellowish brown into black, a centrifugation was conducted at 800 rpm for 5 minutes to obtain a product, which was washed with water and ethanol several times and dried out at 70° C. for 2 hours.

[0037] (2) Preparation of Graphene Dot-Palladium Hybrid

[0038] Preparation of Carbon Dot (Cdot)

[0039] Carbon dot (N-Cdot) was prepared according to the method described in Carbon 2016, 96, 139-144. Briefly, 3 g of citric acid (Ducsan Chemicals) and 3 g of urea (Shinyo Chemical) were added to 10 ml of DI water. The solution was vigorously agitated and then treated in a microwave oven (700 W) for 4 minutes. The resultant solution in dark brown was cooled down to the room temperature and centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 30 minutes to remove a large black aggregate. The supernatant containing the Cdot was neutralized and then washed with DI water several times. The black Cdot thus obtained was collected and dried out in a vacuum oven.

[0040] The dried Cdot was dispersed in ethanol and dropped on a mica substrate to prepare a specimen. Then, a multiMod 8 (Bruker) microscope was used to obtain a tapping mode AFM image of the specimen. According to the results of observation, the Cdot had an average particle diameter of 1.2 nm and a spherical form with a Gaussian distribution.

[0041] Preparation of Graphene Dot-Palladium (Gdot-Pd) Hybrid

[0042] The procedures were performed to prepare a Gdot-Pd hybrid in the same manner as described in the preparation of the nitrogen-doped Gdot-Pd hybrid, excepting that the Cdot prepared above was used in place of the nitrogen-doped Cdot.

Comparative Example 1: Preparation of Pd Nano-Structure

[0043] 34 mg of potassium tetrachloropalladate (K.sub.2PdCl.sub.4) was dissolved in 50 ml of DI water in a 100 ml round flask, and 20 ml of an aqueous solution of 28.4 mM L-ascorbic acid was rapidly added to the solution. The reactant solution was agitated for 2 minutes and stood in an oven at 30° C. for 5 minutes. Once the color of the clear reactant solution turned from yellowish brown into grayish brown, a centrifugation was conducted at 800 rpm for 5 minutes to obtain a product, which was washed with water and ethanol several times and dried out at 70° C. for 2 hours.

Comparative Example 2: Preparation of Pd Nano-Structure

[0044] The procedures were performed to prepare a Pd nano-structure in the same manner as described in Comparative Example 1, excepting that 400 mg of sodium bromide along with potassium tetrachloropalladate was dissolved and put into reaction at 30° C. for 20 minutes.

Comparative Example 3: Preparation of Carbon Dot-Palladium Hybrid

[0045] The procedures were performed to prepare a carbon dot-palladium hybrid in the same manner as described in Example 1, excepting that the reaction was activated at 30° C. for 20 minutes without using sodium bromide (NaBr).

[0046] Once the color of the clear reactant solution turned from yellowish brown into grayish brown, a centrifugation was conducted at 800 rpm for 5 minutes to obtain a product, which was washed with water and ethanol several times and dried out at 70° C. for 2 hours.

[0047] In the preparation of nanoparticles of the Example and the Comparative Examples, the nanoparticles of Example 1 and Comparative Example 2 using sodium bromide (NaBr) had a slower change in the color of the reactant solution than those of Comparative Examples 1 and 3 not using NaBr. This implicitly suggested that the reduction rate of the Pd precursor was reduced by the presence of NaBr.

[0048] FIG. 1 shows the reactions of Example 1 and Comparative Examples in comparison.

Example 2: Analysis of Structural Characteristics of Graphene Dot-Palladium Hybrid

[0049] The morphological characteristics of the Gdot/Pd hybrid prepared in Example 1 were analyzed with a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, JSM-7000F, JEOL, Japan), a transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEM-2010HR), and high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM, JEM-2100F, JEOL, Japan). The specimen was dispersed in ethanol, dropped on a carbon-coated copper TEM grid (TED Pella, Redding, USA), and dried in the normal temperature and pressure conditions.

[0050] FIG. 2 presents the HR-TEM images of the nano-structures prepared according to Comparative Example 1 in (a), Comparative Example 2 in (b), Comparative Example 3 in (c) and (d), and Example 1 in (e) and (f); and XRD patterns in (g). It was shown that the Gdot-Pd hybrid of Example 1 entirely had a porous nanosponge structure. Contrarily, when the Pd precursor was reduced without Cdot, Pd particles densely agglomerated irrespective of the presence of sodium bromide (NaBr). The Pd particles prepared by reduction without NaBr had an almost uniform particle size and a typical d-spacing corresponding to the nano-icosahedral structure ((a) of FIG. 2 (scale bar 100 nm)). In the Comparative Example 2 using sodium bromide (NaBr) added during the reduction of Pd, there was formed a nano-structure having a bumpy surface, which was also a densely agglomerated structure ((b) of FIG. 2 (scale bar 20 nm)). In the Comparative Example 3 using C-dot alone during the reduction of the Pd precursor had a nano-raspberry structure with a size of about 50 to 100 nm in which very tiny spherical nanoparticles agglomerated ((c) and (d) of FIG. 2 (scale bar 100 and 50 nm)). The d-spacing of the Pd nano-raspberry structure was about 0.226 nm as originated from the plane (111), which was dominant as can also be seen from the XRD data. This implicitly suggested that the Cdot played an important role in the formation of the structure. The Gdot-Pd hybrid of Example 1 using sodium bromide (NaBr) along with the Cdot had a three-dimensional nanosponge structure as can be seen in (e) (scale bar 200 nm) and (f) (scale bar nm). In the HR-TEM images, the d-spacing was 0.266, which corresponded to the plane (111) of Pd. The XRD patterns revealed that the Gdot-Pd hybrid having a nanosponge structure was superior in crystallinity than the nanoparticles of the comparative examples.

[0051] The structure was further identified from the HR-TEM images, the Raman spectrum, the XPS spectrum, and the XRD spectrum of FIG. 3. In FIG. 3, (a), (b) and (c) (scale bar 50, 10 and 5 nm, respectively) present the HR-TEM images of the Gdot-Pd hybrid prepared in Example 1, showing that the nanoparticles are connected to each other to form a three-dimensional network having a nanosponge structure. The structure is totally different from that of the nanoparticles prepared in the Comparative Examples. This implicitly suggested that both Cdot and NaBr played an important role in forming the nanosponge structure.

[0052] As can be seen from the enlarged diagram (c) of FIG. 3, the porous nanosponge structure was surrounded by the reduced Gdot having a thin-layered form (as indicated by an arrow in the figure). This implicitly suggested that quasisquare-shaped Cdot having a multi-layered structure was exfoliated in the reaction process to produce sheet-shaped Gdot, which encapsulated the nanosponge structure. In contrast, the Cdot-Pt hybrid prepared without using sodium bromide (NaBr) in the Comparative Example 3 had nanoparticles not surrounded by Cdot or Gdot as can be seen from the enlarged diagram (Data not shown). The Raman spectrum ((d) of FIG. 3) showed the D peak of disordered carbons and the G peak of the graphite carbon, indicating that a Gdot layer was formed on the nanoparticles. A signal for the carbon material near 20° along with the peaks indicating the crystalline structure of Pd was detected in the XRD spectrum ((g) of FIG. 3), showing that Gdot was included in the nanosponge. The peak of C (carbon) was very broad, which implicitly suggested that only a carbon in the graphite form was included, with no crystalline form, and that the size of the Gdot was very small. In FIG. 3, (h) presents the TEM images and XRD spectrum of the Cdot used in the preparation of the Gdot-Pd hybrid, where the Cdot was a spherical particle having a size of 2 to 5 nm as indicated by a very broad XRD peak. (e) and (f) present the XPS spectra for Pd 3d and C is in the Gdot-Pd hybrid, respectively; and (i) presents the XPS spectrum of the Cdot used in the preparation of the hybrid. In comparison of (f) and (i) in FIG. 3, the peak for the sp2 graphite C (C—C) was slightly blue-shifted in the hybrid relative to the Cdot, which implicitly suggested that the Gdot produced by the reduction of the Pd precursor was also partly reduced.

Example 3: Evaluation of Catalytic Activities of Gdot-Pd Hybrid

[0053] Preparation of Working Electrode

[0054] 10 ml of 2-propanol, 29.8 ml of DI water, and 0.2 ml of 5 w % Nafion solution were mixed to prepare a stock solution. 0.5 ml of the stock solution and 0.5 mg of the Gdot-Pd hybrid having a nanosponge structure as prepared in (1) of Example 1 were added into a 2 ml vial and blended with a vortex mixer (KMC-1300V) for 5 minutes. Then, the resultant solution was processed with a sonicator at a temperature of 30° C. or below for 30 minutes to prepare a homogeneous catalyst ink.

[0055] A glassy carbon rotating disc electrode was ground with a suspension of 1 μm grinding diamond and then with a suspension of 0.05 μm Al.sub.2O.sub.3 particles. The ground electrode was washed with DI water, sonicated together with DI water for 5 minutes, and dried out at the room temperature for 30 minutes.

[0056] 3 μl of the catalyst ink prepared above was drop-cast on the dried glassy carbon electrode, and the catalyst film thus obtained was dried at the room temperature for 30 minutes to complete a working electrode.

[0057] Electrochemical Measurement

[0058] The electrochemical measurement was performed in a three-electrode cell equipped with an ALS rotating disc electrode (RDE) device and an IVIUM potentiostat. A platinized Pt mesh was used as a count electrode, and Ag/AgCl(3M Cl) was a reference electrode. The electrolyte was a nitrogen-saturated aqueous solution of 0.5M H.sub.2SO.sub.4.

[0059] For cyclic voltammogram (CV) measurement, the three-electrode cell was purged with ultrahigh-pure nitrogen for 30 minutes. The measurement was performed at a scanning rate of 50 mV/s in the voltage range of 0.05V to 1.20V while purging with nitrogen.

[0060] For a comparison, a working electrode was prepared using a commercial Pt/C(c-Pt/C) catalyst (20% Pt on Vulcan XC-72, Alfa Aesar) or the nanoparticle of Comparative Example 1 or 2 in place of the Gdot-Pd nanosponge, and the procedures were performed in the same manner as described above to perform an electrochemical measurement.

[0061] In FIG. 4, (a) presents CV curves plotted from the electrochemical measurements; and (b) shows the electrochemical surface areas (ECSAs) calculated from the CV curves. In the anodic scan, the onset potential for production of Pd—O was 0.7 V, and the anodic potential for the reduction of Pd—O was 0.7 V. The peaks for hydrogen absorption and adsorption on the surface of the working electrode using the Cdot-Pd nanosponge were observed at 0.13 V and 0.18 V, respectively. The value of ΔE.sub.P between the peaks for hydrogen absorption and adsorption on this working electrode was smaller than that on the working electrode of Comparative Example 3. It was therefore apparent that the Gdot-Pd nanosponge hybrid had higher reversibility and higher hydrogen underpotential deposition rate than the Cdot-Pd hybrid of Comparative Example 3. This is thought because the three-dimensional nano-network structure not only easily captured hydrogen molecules in the pores, but also re-oxidized them with ease.

[0062] The Gdot-Pd nanosponge hybrid of Example 1 had a very high effective surface area due to the three-dimensional network structure and also exhibited far higher electrochemical sensitivity than the Cdot-Pd hybrid of Comparative Example 3 prepared using neither C—PtC nor NaBr as well as the Pd of Comparative Example 1 prepared without Cdot. This proved the Gdot-Pd nanosponge hybrid considerably useful as an electron catalyst.

[0063] In FIG. 5, (a) presents Nyquist plots using an electrochemical impedance spectroscope (EIS), that is, impedance spectra measured at 0.0V.sub.RHE; and (b) presents an enlarged diagram of the Nyquist plots in the high-frequency region. The Nyquist plots consist of two semicircles, with the first one occurring in the high-frequency region and having relevance to the porosity of the surface, and the other one occurring in the low-frequency region and having relevance to the charge transfer. The size of resistance value R.sub.p relevant to porosity was in the order of Comparative Example 1>cPt/C>Comparative Example 3>Example 1, and more specifically, 6.65 Ω>4.133 Ω>2.526 Ω>2.222Ω in the respective numeral values. As for the resistance value R.sub.ct relevant to the charge transfer, Comparative Example 1 had the highest resistance value of 19.18Ω and Example 1 had the lowest resistance value of 0.50Ω. The size of the resistance value R.sub.ct relevant to the charge transfer was in the order of Comparative Example 1>Comparative Example 3>cPt/C>Example 1, and more specifically, 19.18 Ω>7.318 Ω>0.66 Ω>0.50Ω in the respective numeral values.

[0064] The following Tables 1 and 2 summarize the HER parameters of various catalysts and the electrochemical impedance spectroscopic (EIS) data fitting parameters calculated from the Nyquist plots at overvoltage of −0.1V.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 TOF (s.sup.−1) Mass activity (A/g) C.sub.dl C.sub.s Catalyst η.sub.−35 mV η.sub.−50 mV η.sub.−100 mV at η − −50 mV (mF/cm.sup.2) (mF/cm.sup.2) cPt/C 99.6 216.5 1024.5 329.5 — — Comparative 21.9 42.9 182.4 77.8 7.92 0.04 Example 1 Comparative 64.7 140.9 724.2 255.5 28.77 0.04 Example 3 Example 1 174.9 374.9 1214.4 679.7 53.63 0.04

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Comparative Comparative Parameters cPt/C Example 1 Example 3 Example 1 R1 8.35 8.245 8.126 7.989 Rp 4.133 6.65 2.526 2.222 CPE1-T 0.070791 0.012307 0.015204 0.01628 CPE1-P 0.77097 0.81505 0.77925 1.046 Rct 0.66 19.18 7.318 0.50 CPE2-T 9.4107E−05 2.8980E−05 5.0283E−05 1.4688E−04 CPE2-P 0.72167 0.95688 0.8506 0.7574 Chi-squared 0.0021346 0.003845 0.0020057 0.0043906

[0065] FIG. 6 presents an analytical results of the catalytic activity for the HER reaction in a nitrogen-saturated aqueous solution of 0.5M H.sub.2SO.sub.4 according to the linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). The detailed data are presented in Table 3. In FIG. 6, (a) presents polarization curves and the overvoltage at 10 mA/cm.sup.2 (inner diagram); (b) presents Tafel plots measured at a scan rate of 10 mV/s and a rotation speed of 1600 rpm in an aqueous solution of 0.5 H.sub.2SO.sub.4; (c) presents LSV curves of the Gdot-Pd nanosponge electrode after the 1.sup.st and 300.sup.th cycles of operation; and (d) presents chronoamperometry graphs at overvoltage of −120 mV.sub.RHE.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Non- Exchange exchange Overvoltage Tafel current current TOF (mV) (at 10 slope density density (s.sup.−1) mA/ (mV/ (mA/ (mA/ (at η = 35 Catalysts cm.sup.2) dec) cm.sup.2) cm.sup.2 .Math. mg) mV) cPt/C −40 35 0.64 237.04 99.6 Comparative −92 72 0.15 55.55 21.9 Example 1 Comparative −49 43 0.47 174.07 64.7 Example 3 Example 1 −32 33 0.76 281.48 174.9

[0066] It was apparent from FIG. 6 that the Gdot-Pd nanosponge was superior in the performance for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) to the cPt/C as well as the nanoparticles of the comparative examples and hence useful as an electron catalyst. The overvoltage at 10 mA/cm.sup.2 is an important variable that needs to be considered in the design of fuel cells and used as a standard variable. The inner diagram in (a) of FIG. 6 shows the overvoltage. As can be seen from the values of Table 3, the overvoltage of the Gdot-Pt nanosponge was −32 mV, lower than that of the commercial cPt/C, −40 mV. In addition, the slope of the Tafel plots also indicated that the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) was enhanced when using the Gdot-Pd nanosponge rather than the other catalysts. This implicitly suggested that the Gdot-Pd nanosponge had higher catalytic activity for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). The exchange current density and the non-exchange current density measured by chromoamperometry were also highest in the Gdot-Pd nanosponge, suggesting that the Gdot-Pd nanosponge was most excellent in the catalytic activity. According to the chromoamperometry, the cPt/C, the Comparative Example 3, and the Gdot-Pd nanosponge had a relatively slow change in the current densities over time, while the Comparative Example 1 had an abrupt decrease in the current densities. Particularly, the Gdot-Pd nanosponge had stable current densities with an elapse of time and hence proved to be excellent in catalytic durability. The durability of the Gdot-Pd nanosponge catalyst can be determined from the LSV curve of (c). As the catalysts normally deteriorate in activities after a long-term use under the acidic conditions the durability of HER catalysts is one of the most critical characteristics. According to the LSV curves, the Gdot-Pd nanosponge had almost no change in the on-set potential or current densities after 3000 cycles of operation and thus excellent in durability. This was because the Gdot surrounding the surface of the nanosponge structure functions to protect the Pd catalyst. In contrast, the Comparative Example 3 or the cPt/C catalyst had a great decrease in the current densities after 3000 cycles of operation (data not shown).

[0067] In FIG. 7, (a) presents CV curves measured at a scan rate of 50 mV/s in a solution of 0.1M KOH+1.0M CH.sub.3OH for the sake of evaluating the catalytic activity for the methanol oxidation reaction (MOR); and (b) presents CO stripping CV curves measured at a scan rate of 50 mV/s in a 0.1M KOH solution.

[0068] Referring to (a) of FIG. 7, the Gdot-Pd catalyst was superior in the electrochemical activity to the other catalysts. In addition, (b) of FIG. 7 shows that the Gdot-Pd catalyst was excellent in resistance to CO and thus resistant to poisoning.