METHOD OF HYPER-FEED MACHINING TURBOMACHINE BLADED COMPONENTS
20210402529 · 2021-12-30
Inventors
- William Q. Tingley (Grand Rapids, MI, US)
- William Q. Tingley, III (Grand Rapids, MI, US)
- Daniel R. Bradley (Grand Rapids, MI, US)
Cpc classification
F01D5/34
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B23P13/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B23P15/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F01D5/14
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B23D5/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Y02T50/60
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
F05D2230/53
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
Abstract
A method of hyper-feed machining the bladed components of turbomachines, and more specifically their bladed components. Hyper-feed machining, by means of the physical process of controlled fracturing, is the fastest, most precise, and nearest net shape method of machining in existence. The practical effects of the invention are: (1) the production of new and useful small-scale gas turbine engines for a wide range of previously impossible or impractical applications, and (2) the production of existing larger-scale gas turbine engines with great improvements in material removal rates by orders of magnitude, greater precision and geometric complexity of the bladed components, faster overall rates of production of these engines, and significantly reduced costs in production. As a consequence, the best preferred embodiment of the invention is the small-scale turboshaft electric engine for automotive vehicles, which makes possible a turbo-electric vehicle that replaces both the electric battery vehicle and the piston-engine vehicle.
Claims
1. A method of hyper-feed machining components for use in a turbomachine comprising the steps of: providing a workpiece that is metal or a material of similar machining characteristics for use in the turbomachine; driving a cutting tool into the workpiece using at least 20,000 lbs/sq-in of an impact induced force to produce controlled fracturing which exceeds both the yield strength and the breaking strength of the workpiece material by an impact force which causes the axial projection of adiabatic shear banding of the workpiece material along the perimeter of the cutting tool; and removing desired amounts of material from the workpiece at precise locations to create both a disk and a plurality of blades without plastic deformation; shaping the workpiece into a turbomachine component at a rate to provide a substantially significant cost savings in production as compared to milling.
2. A method of hyper-feed machining as in claim 1, wherein the workpiece is shaped into a blisk.
3. A process of manufacturing a turbomachine component using hyper-feed machining comprising the steps of: fixturing a workpiece to a table; positioning a face of a cutting tool substantially perpendicular to a surface of the workpiece; approaching the surface of the workpiece with the cutting tool to a predetermined clearance level; driving the cutting tool into the workpiece through the use of controlled fracturing by simultaneously exceeding the yield strength and the breaking strength of the workpiece material so to prevent plastic deformation by an impact which causes the axial projection of adiabatic banding along the circumference of the tool to remove desired amounts of workpiece material without plastic deformation; creating shear bands in the workpiece that emanate from the face of the cutting tool using the forces provided by the cutting tool to shape the workpiece into the turbomachine component; removing material from the workpiece at a substantially rapid feed to increase the rate of volumetric material removal to at least an order of magnitude higher than that provided by milling processes; withdrawing the cutting tool from the workpiece to a predetermined level; and repeating the step of driving an asymmetrical cutting tool through the workpiece to form the turbomachine component having a greater geometrical complexity than that possible using milling processes.
4. The process of manufacturing as in claim 3, further comprising the step of: providing a force of at least 20,000 lbs/sq-in to remove predetermined amounts of workpiece material having a desired size and shape to form the blades of a turbomachine blisk.
5. A method of hyper-feed machining a bladed component for use in a turbomachine comprising the steps of: fixturing workpiece that is metal or a material of similar machining characteristics to a table of the multi-axis machine tool; adjusting the cutting face of a machine tool by rotating the cutting tool or workpiece so that an optimal cutting force can be achieved; approaching the surface of the workpiece with the cutting tool to a level sufficient to clear obstructions and to allow acceleration of the cutting tool to the feed required for controlled fracturing; driving the cutting tool without rotation about its axis into the workpiece using a force of at least 20,000 lbs/sq-in through the use of controlled fracturing by simultaneously exceeding the yield strength and the breaking strength of the workpiece material by an impact to cause the axial projection of adiabatic banding along the perimeter of the tool; removing desired workpiece material at a substantially fast feed to form at least one blade that conforms to the perimeter of the cutting face of the cutting tool such that both volumetric material removal of the workpiece and the geometrical complexity of the at least one blade is greater than that possible by milling; and shaping the workpiece into a turbomachine blade for use in a blisk at a rate to provide a substantially significant cost savings in production as compared to milling.
6. A method of hyper-feed machining blisk as in claim 5, further comprising the step of: forming the blisk for use in a substantially small scale gas turbine engine.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0009] The accompanying figures where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views and which together with the detailed descriptions below are incorporated in and form part of the specification, serve to further illustrate various embodiments and to explain various principles and advantages all in accordance with the present invention.
[0010]
[0011]
[0012]
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016] Skilled artisans will recognize that the figures illustrate the invention's elements, including its principles, elements, embodiments, and advantages, for simplicity and clarity. Therefore skilled artisans will also recognize that these elements are not necessarily to scale, may be exaggerated, and are not intended as mechanical drawings or other such production documents.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Introduction
[0017] Before describing in detail the embodiments that are in accordance with the present invention, it should be observed that the embodiments reside primarily in combinations of the method of hyper-feed machining and the apparatus of a gas turbine engine's bladed components. Accordingly, the method and apparatus have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present invention so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
[0018] In this document, relational terms such as first and second, top and bottom, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. An element proceeded by “comprises . . . a” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises the element.
The Hyper-Feed Machining Method
[0019] The invention's use of linear force to remove material from the workpiece is the physical process of controlled fracturing. It occurs by applying an impact force that simultaneously exceeds the yield strength and the breaking strength of the workpiece material to initiate controlled fracturing instead of plastic deformation to remove material. The material used in methods and processes described herein is a metal and/or other materials having similar machining characteristics. The present invention can also be used to machine materials in which controlled fracture cannot be induced, such as plastic and carbon-fiber, but the material removal occurs by the process of plastic deformation instead of controlled fracture. Instead a controlled-fracture impact causes an axial projection of adiabatic banding of micro-cracks along the perimeter of the cutting tool to produce a repeatable, precise removal of workpiece material. Hyper-feed machining is the method of using the physical process of controlled fracture to the machining of workpieces. The result is the fastest, most precise, and nearest net shape method of machining in existence.
[0020] The application of hyper-feed machining to the bladed components of a gas turbine engine is new and useful, as evidenced in particular by the new capability to manufacture small-scale gas turbine engines of all types as described above in the invention's first fundamental advance. Among these newly available small-scale gas turbine engines, the most preferred embodiment is the turbo-electric automotive vehicle that would replace both the electric battery vehicle and the piston engine vehicle. The process of controlled fracture machining is further described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/835,186 entitled Controlled Fracture Machining Method For Producing Through-Holes, filed Mar. 30, 2020 and assigned to Tennine Corp. which is also herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
[0021] The invention's second fundamental advance in the manufacture of current gas turbine engines in production also has new and useful improvements, including: (1) greater geometric complexity of the bladed components for improved performance, (2) greater precision in machining to net shape, (3) greater precision and less distortion in machining thin cross-sections making possible greater reduction in the blisk's mass, thus lowering the pressure needed to rotate the bladed components, and (4) greater ease of production reducing the cost and time of manufacture while improving precision and dimensional accuracy, among other things. The invention makes possible both of these fundamental advances in the production of gas turbine engines without any compromises.
[0022] Hyper-feed machining overcomes the inherent limitations in the current use of computer numerical-controlled milling of the compressor 101, 202, 301 and turbine 103, 204, 303, 305 components of a gas turbine 100, 200, 300, especially when those components are in the favored form of a blisk 400. Hyper-feed machining does not rely upon torque as a cutting force. The cutting tool 504 is driven strictly by linear forces through the blisk workpiece 500, 501, 502, 503 to machine to net shape its geometrically complex surface 402 of blades 401 integrated with the blisk's base 403.
[0023] Thus, the invention's method of hyper-feed machining produces the desired net shape in the workpiece by using controlled fracturing to induce an abrupt, highly localized, and substantially extreme force of a cutting tool 504 against the workpiece 500, 501, 502, 503. This force must be sufficient to exceed simultaneously the yield strength and the breaking strength of the material of the workpiece. When the force is applied, adiabatic shear bands form in the workpiece as a microstructure of micro-cracks emanating in the direction of the cutting tool 504 within the outside contour 505 of the cutting tool as projected into the workpiece 500, 501, 502, 503. Under the continued force of the cutting tool moving through the workpiece, this microstructure softens relative to the uncut material surrounding it, because the cracked material becomes highly fractured, even to the point of recrystallizing. Once softened the cutting tool shears this material from the workpiece as waste which retains almost all of the heat generated by the process, because its microstructure of cracks retards the transfer of heat to material outside of the microstructure. The end result of this controlled fracture process is a shape 402 cut into the workpiece 500, 501, 502, 503 with the same contour 505 as the cutting tool 504.
[0024]
[0025] Employing linear force by means of hyper-feed machining eliminates restrictions on the shape and size of the cutting tool 504 so that its cutting edge 505 can more closely conform to the ideal design 402 of the bladed components. This also keeps the cutting tool continuously in cut as it is driven through the blisk workpiece 500 501 502 503 and increases the rate of volumetric material removal by orders of magnitude over current methods of machining. For example, the blisk 400 may have a 6-inch diameter base 403 with compound-curved blades 401 that are 0.030-inch thick and separated by a 0.100- to 0.141-inch tapered gap 402. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the dimensions of this example do not indicate any restrictions in the size and complexity of the blisks that can be machined by controlled fracturing. Blisks configured from one-tenth to ten times the size of the example, and beyond, can be machined under the same principles, because this method of production is fully scalable.
[0026] With the blisk fixtured 507 on a five-axis hyper-feed machining center 506, for example, the blisk workpiece 400 can be presented at any angle and orientation that maximizes the performance of the cutting tool 504. Volumetric material removal rates of hyper-feed machining are one or more orders of magnitude greater than the most advanced current milling methods. Typical of this performance on a blisk is moving a 0.100-inch wide cutting tool through the blisk workpiece 500 501 502 503 at a feed rate of at least 1,200 inches a minute, thus completing the blisk 400 to a precision, finely finished, net shape surface 402 in about 10 minutes time. This compares to several hours or more work using current milling methods with less precision and greater departures from net shape for the blisk, assuming that current methods can even machine the complex surfaces required of blisk blades.
New and Useful Embodiments of the Invention
[0027] Those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention makes possible the greater geometric complexity in the design of a bladed component's 400 surface 402 to improve the performance of a turbomachine, especially the gas turbine 100, 200, 300. The complexity is one of compound curves, often curve on curve on curve, in which the blades 401 of a compressor 101, 202, 301 or a turbine 103, 204, 303, 305 are folded over themselves or even over the neighboring blade. This complexity provides a greater surface area over a volume of fluid flow so that a flow pressure, lower than that needed to turn the bladed components of existing gas turbine engines, is sufficient for operation of new ones made possible by the invention. Like scalability, this greater geometric complexity is possible because of the hyper-feed machining feature of the invention and its employment of linear-force driven 500, 501, 502, 503 asymmetrical cutting tools 504 that can be shaped with the cutting edges 505 and clearances needed to precisely machine, without clearance problems or interference with previously machined surfaces, to net shape 402 curve on curve on curve folded blades 401 of a compressor 101, 202, 301, a turbine 103, 204, 303, 305, or other bladed component of a gas turbine engine. Those skilled in the art will also recognize that hyper-feed machining's use of linear force, as opposed to conventional milling's use of torque, provides sufficient force to remove material from the workpiece 500, 501, 502, 503.
[0028]
[0029] A gas turbine engine 100 operates as follows: (1) The fluid flows into the compressor 101, (2) the compressor compresses the flow, which increases its velocity, (3) the compressed flow enters the combustor 102 which heats and adds energy to the flow, (4) the flow exits the combustor to turn the turbine 103, (5) the turbine turns to drive the compressor by means of the shaft 104 connecting them, and (6) the flow exits the turbine through a nozzle 206, in the simplest form of a gas turbine engine, as a jet to provide propulsion, or to drive a device 307 either for power generation or for transmission for propulsion.
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033] Thus, the present invention's preferred embodiments described above are specifically the production of a blisk, a bladed ring, and other similar bladed components of a gas turbine engine using the invention's hyper-feed machining to induce the material removal phenomenon of controlled fracture. By removing material from the workpiece through the use of controlled fracture, as opposed to the plastic deformation of conventional milling, heat from the machining process is retained in the waste and not imparted to the workpiece. Therefore, thin and geometrically complex cross-sections can be machined without compromising the physical, structural, and dimensional integrity of the workpiece.
[0034] Hyper-feed machining significantly increases the ease of production and the geometric complexity of the bladed components of gas turbine engines while manufacturing them more closely to their ideal design. Hyper-feed machining also makes possible the manufacture of gas turbine engines, across the full scale of practical sizes. This is true in particular for small-scale gas turbine engines as described above, because current methods are relatively crude and cannot reproduce the ideal design of the geometric complexity of bladed components such as the compressor and turbine. Therefore, even the most advanced current methods of milling can only approximate the ideal design, assuming it is even possible or practical to use these methods, if the size of the gas turbine engine to be produced is sufficiently large to partially render the deviations from the design minor.
The Preferred Embodiment of the Invention
[0035] Of the many new and useful embodiments of the invention, as described above, the currently best embodiment is the small-scale turboshaft electric engine for automotive vehicles, as illustrated in
[0036] In comparison to the current state-of-the-art electric automobiles, primarily the electric battery vehicle, the invention's turboshaft electric engine for automobiles eliminates “range anxiety”. Range anxiety is the concern that an electric battery vehicle driver has in finding a station to recharge the battery before it is depleted. This anxiety restricts the use of electric battery vehicles to mostly local use for recharging overnight at home. Out-of-town travel requires planning routes that will bring the electric battery vehicle to recharging stations within the automobile's range. Lacking a nationwide infrastructure of recharging stations that make them as common as gasoline stations, long-distance travel in an electric battery vehicle remains impractical. This is not so with the turboshaft electric automobile. The combustion chamber can use gasoline and many other types of fuel to ignite the compressed air flowing into the chamber. This makes the existing fueling infrastructure of gasoline stations sufficient for driving the invention's turboshaft electric automotive vehicles long distances.
[0037] Again in comparison to electric battery vehicles, the invention's turboshaft electric automobile completely eliminates the necessity of a battery (although there are practical uses for smaller internally rechargeable auxiliary batteries). The large, heavy, and expensive battery of an electric battery vehicle typically must be replaced before the life of the automobile is exhausted. Furthermore, these batteries are a source of environmental pollution, both in the mining and processing of the metals needed for them and their final disposal. Also, although the operation of an electric battery vehicle is not direct source of pollution, it must be recharged with electricity produced by power plants. Therefore, the electric battery vehicle merely shifts the source of pollution from vehicle to power plant. In contrast, the turboshaft electric automobile uses only a small amount of fuel for combustion, therefore producing only minor emissions. These fuels can be gasoline, compressed natural gas, propane, and other types of readily-available fossil fuels. For all these and other reasons, the small-scale turboshaft electric engine for use in automotive vehicles represents the best preferred embodiment of the invention.
[0038] In the foregoing specification, specific embodiments of the present invention have been described. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention. The benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential features or elements of any or all the claims. The invention is defined solely by the appended claims including any amendments made during the pendency of this application and all equivalents of those claims as issued.