APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR THERMALLY TESTING A SAMPLE
20210396695 · 2021-12-23
Inventors
- Kamaljit Singh CHANA (Oxford (Oxfordshire), GB)
- Vikram SRIDHAR (Oxford (Oxfordshire), GB)
- Saleema KHIMJI (Toronto, CA)
Cpc classification
G01N33/15
PHYSICS
International classification
Abstract
The invention provides an apparatus and a method for testing a sample, with a sensor element (4) comprising a first conductor (301), a second conductor (302) and a third conductor (303) in series. The first conductor (301) is connected to the second conductor (302) at a first sensing junction (316A) and the second conductor (302) is connected to the third conductor (303) at a second sensing junction (316B). Heating is applied to a sample via Joule heating in the second conductor (303). A thermal response is measured (12) via a potential difference between the first conductor and the third conductor generated by the Seebeck effect.
Claims
1. An apparatus for testing a sample, comprising: a sensor element comprising a first conductor, a second conductor and a third conductor, wherein: the first conductor, second conductor and third conductor are connected together electrically in series; the first conductor is connected to the second conductor at a first sensing junction; the second conductor is connected to the third conductor at a second sensing junction; and the apparatus further comprises a measurement unit configured to: apply heating to a sample under test via Joule heating in the second conductor, the Joule heating being generated by driving an electrical current in series through the first conductor, second conductor and third conductor; measure a thermal response of the sample to the heating by measuring a potential difference between the first conductor and the third conductor, wherein the potential difference is influenced by a temperature gradient along the first conductor and a temperature gradient along the third conductor via the Seebeck effect; and generate an indication of whether the sample satisfies a predetermined criterion based on the measured thermal response.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein a majority of the electrical resistance in the circuit through which current is driven to provide the Joule heating is contributed by the second conductor.
3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the electrical resistance of the second conductor is at least 2 times higher than the electrical resistance of the first conductor and than the electrical resistance of the third conductor.
4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the second conductor is locally elongate and has a length that is at least 2 times longer than a shortest distance between the first sensing junction and the second sensing junction.
5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the second conductor comprises a spiral, a helix or a serpentine shape.
6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein an average cross-sectional area of the second conductor is at least 2 times smaller than an average cross-sectional area of the first conductor and than an average cross-sectional area of the third conductor.
7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first sensing junction is formed by welding of the first conductor to the second conductor and the second sensing junction is formed by welding of the second conductor to the third conductor.
8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first conductor, second conductor and third conductor all have different compositions.
9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the first conductor and third conductor are respectively formed from one of the following pairs of materials: chromel and constantan as for a type E thermocouple device; iron and constantan as for a type J thermocouple device; chromel and alumel as for a type K thermocouple device; 82% Ni/18% Mo and 99.2% Ni/0.8% Co, by weight, as for a type M thermocouple device; Nicrosil and Nisil as for a type N thermocouple device; copper and constantan as for a type T thermocouple; 70% Pt/30% Rh and 94% Pt/6% Rh, by weight, as for a type B thermocouple device; 87% Pt/13% Rh by weight and platinum as for a type R thermocouple device; 90% Pt/10% Rh by weight and platinum as for a type S thermocouple device; 95% W/5% Re and 74% W/26% Re, by weight, as for a type C thermocouple device; 97% W/3% Re and 75% W/25% Re, by weight, as for a type D thermocouple device; and Tungsten and 74% W/26% Re by weight as for a type G thermocouple device.
10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein: each of at least part of the first conductor, at least part of the second conductor, and at least part of the third conductor is embedded in a matrix material; and one or more of the following are flush with an outer surface of the matrix material and can be brought into direct contact with the sample: the first sensing junction, the second sensing junction, and the second conductor.
11. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the heating of the sample and the measurement of the thermal response are performed in non-overlapping time periods.
12. A method of testing a sample, comprising: providing a sensor element comprising a first conductor, a second conductor and a third conductor, wherein: the first conductor, second conductor and third conductor are connected together electrically in series; the first conductor is connected to the second conductor at a first sensing junction; the second conductor is connected to the third conductor at a second sensing junction; and the method further comprises: applying heating to a sample under test via Joule heating in the second conductor, the Joule heating being generated by driving an electrical current in series through the first conductor, second conductor and third conductor; measuring a thermal response of the sample to the heating by measuring a potential difference between the first conductor and the third conductor, wherein the potential difference is influenced by a temperature gradient along the first conductor and a temperature gradient along the third conductor via the Seebeck effect; and generating an indication of whether the sample satisfies a predetermined criterion based on the measured thermal response.
13. The method claim 12, the heating of the sample and the measurement of the thermal response are performed in non-overlapping time periods.
14. The method of claim 12 wherein the sample comprises a pharmaceutical product.
15. The method of claim 12 wherein the sample comprises a liquid.
16. The method of 12, wherein the sample comprises a solid body.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein: the thermal response of the sample to the heating is measured with the sensor element in contact with a first region on the sample; and a further thermal response of the sample to the heating is measured using a further sensor element in contact with a second region on the sample, the second region being separate from the first region.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein the second region is on an opposite side of the sample to the first region.
19. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the sample comprises a pharmaceutical product.
20. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the sample comprises a liquid or a solid body.
Description
[0012] Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which corresponding reference symbols indicate corresponding parts, and in which:
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023] Embodiments of the present disclosure provide apparatus and methods for testing a sample, for example a pharmaceutical product, to determine whether the sample satisfies a predetermined criterion. The predetermined criterion may relate to whether a pharmaceutical product is a genuine version of the pharmaceutical product, whether the pharmaceutical product has reached a predetermined level of quality or purity, and/or whether the pharmaceutical product contains less than a desired minimum amount of a target substance or more than a desired maximum amount of an undesired impurity. The testing procedure may thus comprise determining compositional information about a pharmaceutical product. The compositional information may comprise any compositional property that affects thermal characteristics, in particular heat transfer characteristics, of the pharmaceutical product. The compositional information may comprise chemical or structural information. The sample may comprise a solid, for example in the form of a tablet or powder. In an embodiment, the sample comprises a solid body for oral administration (e.g. a tablet), the solid body comprising a pharmaceutically active ingredient. In other embodiments, the sample comprises a liquid, such as a medicine in liquid form.
[0024] The methods use a sensor element to apply heating to the sample (e.g. pharmaceutical product). A thermal response (which may be referred to also as a temperature response) of the sample is measured. The thermal response is dependent on a heat transfer characteristic of the sample. The heat transfer characteristic depends on chemical and/or structural properties of the sample. The measured thermal response therefore provides information about chemical and/or structural properties of the sample. The heat transfer characteristic affects how efficiently heat will be conducted away from the sensor element. Applied heat penetrates underneath the surface of the sample being sensed, allowing sub-surface structure to be sensed, such as different layers of a pharmaceutical product, or inhomogeneities or inclusions within a pharmaceutical product. The methodology is thus sensitive to pharmaceutical products in which an active or other component is distributed within a matrix material having a different composition. The ability to detect sub-structure makes it possible for the sensing to be performed through materials separating the sensor element from the material of interest, including not only outer layers of a pharmaceutical product but also packaging or other materials that may be present around the pharmaceutical product.
[0025] Sensing can be achieved effectively even for relatively low heating power. The method can be performed for example without increasing the local temperature of the sample by more than a few degrees Celsius (e.g. 2-5 degrees Celsius). Thermal damage to the sample is therefore avoided. Overall power requirements are also kept low, facilitating implementation as a portable (e.g. battery powered) device.
[0026] Heat transfer characteristics of materials (e.g. thermal properties such as thermal conductivity, κ, specific heat capacity, c, and quantities that depend on one or both of these properties) can depend sensitively on the composition (e.g. chemical or structural) of the materials. The thermal product, √{square root over (ρcκ)}, where ρ is equal to the density, is often a heat transfer characteristic that is particularly sensitive to composition because it takes into account both κ and c. Changes in either or both of κ and c will typically result in a change in √{square root over (ρcκ)}. Changes in relative concentrations of different components in a multi-component material can be detected where the different components have different thermal properties. Changes in structure can be detected where there is a density or compositional change.
[0027]
[0028] The apparatus 2 comprises a measurement unit 12. The measurement unit 12 applies heating to the sample 6 via the sensor element 4. The measurement unit 12 measures a thermal response to the heating to determine compositional information about the sample 6. The thermal response is dependent on a heat transfer characteristic of the sample 6, as discussed above. The measurement unit 12 uses the measured thermal response to provide an indication about whether the sample 6 satisfies a predetermined criterion.
[0029] In an embodiment, the probe tip 8 comprises a deformable coupling member 20 that deforms on engagement with the sample 6 when the probe tip 8 is brought into contact with the sample 6. The sensor element 4 is mounted on, in, and/or in thermal contact with, the deformable coupling member 20. The deformable coupling member 20 may be configured to deform elastically (e.g. such that the deformable coupling member 20 is resilient and springs back to an equilibrium shape when the contact between the probe 8 and the sample 6 is removed). In an embodiment, the deformable coupling member 20 comprises a foam material or a deformable membrane (pocket) comprising a fluid such as air. An example arrangement is shown in
[0030] The deformable coupling member 20 helps a user to maintain a suitable force between the probe 8 and the sample 6 during testing, thereby improving accuracy and repeatability of the measurements.
[0031] The principle of operation of the sensor element 4 builds on that of traditional thermocouples, so a short discussion of this is now given with reference to
[0032]
[0033] The potential difference indicative of the temperature T.sub.s at the sensing junction 216 arises because of the Seebeck effect. In a K-type thermocouple, for example, the first leg 201 is formed from chromel and the second leg 202 is formed from alumel. The first and second measurement wires 231 and 232 are formed from the same material as each other (e.g. copper). The temperature in region 205 (containing junctions 211 and 212) is known and may be denoted T.sub.0. The temperature in region 204 (containing the sensing junction 216) is then obtained as follows.
[0034] The Seebeck effect describes the electromotive force that arises when there is a temperature gradient in an electrically conductive material. When there is no internal current flow, the gradient of the voltage, ΔV, is related to the gradient in temperature, ΔT, by the Seebeck coefficient S(T), which is a temperature dependent material property, as follows:
ΔV=−S(T)ΔT
[0035] The potential difference between 213 and 214 does not depend on the temperature in region 206 because the first and second measurement wires 231 and 232 are formed from the same material and have the same temperature gradient along them. The potential difference depends entirely on the properties of the first and second legs 201 and 202 and the temperature difference between T.sub.0 and T.sub.s. The potential difference is given by the following expression:
∫.sub.T.sub.
where S.sub.+ and S.sub.− are the Seebeck coefficients of the materials forming the first and second legs 201 and 202 (chromel and alumel in the example above). A characteristic function E(T) for a given thermocouple can be established using calibration measurements and the potential difference V between 213 and 214 will be given by the following expression:
V=E(T.sub.s)−E(T.sub.0)
where
E(T)=∫(S.sub.+(T′)−S.sub.−(T′))dT′+constant
[0036]
[0037] The first conductor 301 is connected to the second conductor 302 (e.g. by welding) at a first sensing junction 316A. The second conductor 302 is connected to the third conductor 303 (e.g. by welding) at a second sensing junction 316B.
[0038] The measurement unit 12 applies heating to a sample (e.g. pharmaceutical product) under test provided in region 304 via Joule heating in the second conductor 302. The Joule heating is generated by the measurement circuit 308 driving an electrical current through the series of first conductor 301, second conductor 302 and third conductor 303. The electrical current also flows through first and second measurement wires 331 and 332 respectively connecting the first conductor 301 and the third conductor 303 to the measurement circuit 308.
[0039] As in the thermocouple device 200 of
[0040] The measurement circuit 308 measures a temperature in the region 304 in thermal contact with the second conductor 302 and thereby measures a thermal response of the sample 6 (which is also in thermal contact with the region 304, for example by being in direct contact with the second conductor 302). The measurement of the thermal response can be performed during or after the application of the Joule heating via the second conductor 302. In the example discussed below with reference to
[0041] The measurement of the thermal response is performed by measuring a potential difference between the first conductor 301 and the third conductor 303. The potential difference is influenced by the Seebeck effect associated with a temperature gradient along the first conductor 301 and a temperature gradient along the third conductor 303. In the example of
[0042] The first conductor 301 consists of a first material. The third conductor 303 consists of a second material. The first material and the second material are different, such that a potential difference generated by the temperature gradient along the first conductor 301 is different to the potential difference generated by the temperature gradient along the third conductor 303. In an embodiment, the first and second materials are selected to match pairs of materials used for the positive and negative legs of traditional thermocouple devices such as the thermocouple device 200 discussed above with reference to
[0043] In an embodiment, as depicted in
[0044] The curve 342 schematically depicts how the temperature of the sample 6 is expected to change as a function of time. The temperature increases during the heating pulse 340 and decreases outside of the heating pulse 340. The measurement of the temperature by the sensor element 4 is performed outside of the heating pulse 340. This is an example of a class of embodiments in which the heating and the measurement of the thermal response are performed in non-overlapping time periods. Performing the heating and the measurement of the thermal response in non-overlapping time periods simplifies the electronics required to implement the measurement unit 12 significantly.
[0045] In an embodiment, a response to the heating pulse is compared with the response to a corresponding heating pulse applied to a reference material. The size of the response, the variation of the response as a function of time, or various other aspects of the response may be considered. Any deviation from the response measured for the reference material may be used to detect a deviation from normality for the sample 6 being tested. The nature of the heating pulses may be selected to achieve optimum sensitivity for the particular type of sample (e.g. pharmaceutical product) being tested. This may involve selecting particular pulse shapes, amplitudes, durations and/or repetition rates, for example.
[0046] The measurement unit 12 generates an indication of whether the sample 6 satisfies a predetermined criterion based on the measured thermal response. In an embodiment, this is achieved by comparing the measured thermal response to a corresponding measured response obtained at an earlier time for a reference sample (e.g. a reference pharmaceutical product). In a case where the apparatus 2 is being used to detect counterfeit drugs, for example, the reference pharmaceutical product 6 may consist of a genuine version of the drug in question. In one implementation, the apparatus 2 is provided with a user input unit 18 (e.g. a button), as exemplified schematically in
[0047] In the example of
[0048] In an embodiment, a majority of the electrical resistance in the circuit through which current is driven to provide the Joule heating is contributed by the second conductor 302. In an embodiment, the electrical resistance of the second conductor 302 is at least 2 times, optionally at least 5 times, optionally at least 10 times, higher than the electrical resistance of the first conductor 301 and than the electrical resistance of the third conductor 303. The Joule heating is thus focussed spatially in the region of the second conductor 302. In an embodiment, the separation between the first and second sensing junctions 316A and 316B is less than the length of either of the first and third conductors 301 and 303. Thus, not only is the overall amount of Joule heating occurring in the second conductor 302 higher than in either of the first and third conductors 301 and 303, the heating is concentrated spatially, leading to a majority of the power per unit volume being delivered in the region 304.
[0049] In an embodiment, an average cross-sectional area (e.g. averaged longitudinally) of the second conductor 302 is at least 2 times, optionally at least 5 times, optionally at least 10 times, smaller than an average cross-sectional area (e.g. averaged longitudinally) of the first conductor 301 and than an average cross-sectional area (e.g. averaged longitudinally) of the third conductor 303. This approach helps to achieve high resistance without excessively increasing the length of the second conductor 302.
[0050] Alternatively or additionally, as depicted in
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]