Low onset gain saturation OLED
11201314 · 2021-12-14
Inventors
Cpc classification
H01S5/183
ELECTRICITY
H10K50/852
ELECTRICITY
H10K2102/00
ELECTRICITY
B82Y20/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
H01S5/04253
ELECTRICITY
H10K50/818
ELECTRICITY
International classification
Abstract
Embodiments of this invention relate to and, more particularly, to solid state lighting, digital displays, conversion of electrical energy to light, low onset gain saturated stimulate emission, light production with high efficiency and high output per area, and light production while limiting material degradation, and may also be applied in optical or quantum information processing and networking. Embodimenta of this invention comprise spectroscopic configurations having a radiative transition to a depopulated state and an optical configuration having sufficient Q such that the combination allows onset of gain saturation with a small excited state population or low current density, thus enabling production of light in a mode with near total output coupling, high efficiency, high output, low roll-off and attenuation of losses and degradation processes.
Claims
1. An electroluminescent device comprising: (a) a positive electrode; (b) a negative electrode; (c) an emissive layer being able to emit emitted radiation by spontaneous emission, the emissive layer being in operational contact with the positive electrode and the negative electrode; the emissive layer having a radiative transition to a depopulated level, thereby being able to produce light by a gain saturated emission (“GSE”).
2. The electroluminescent device as described in claim 1, further comprising: (d) a first reflective surface located at a first side of the emissive layer, (e) a second reflective surface located at a second side of the emissive layer opposite to the first side, and (f) a cavity between the first and second reflective surfaces, the cavity having a cavity length, the cavity length being resonant with the radiative transition.
3. The electroluminescent device as described in claim 2, wherein the emissive layer comprises a material, the first reflective surface has a first reflectance, the second reflective surface has a second reflectance, the GSE having an onset; and whereby an operational combination of (i) the material, (ii) the first reflectance, and (iii) the second reflectance at the GSE onset results in a small inversion level.
4. The electroluminescent device as described in claim 3, in which the emissive layer is located near an antinode within the cavity.
5. The electroluminescent device as described in claim 3, in which the material is selected to substantially avoid absorption by the material of the emitted radiation.
6. The electroluminescent device as described in claim 4, in which the material is selected to substantially avoid absorption by the material of the emitted radiation.
7. The electroluminescent device as described in claim 3, whereby an operational combination of (i) the material, (ii) the first reflectance, (iii) the second reflectance, and (iv) the cavity length results in a low current density at the GSE onset.
8. The electroluminescent device as described in claim 3, whereby an operational combination of (i) the material, (ii) the first reflectance, (iii) the second reflectance, and (iv) the cavity length results in a small inversion level at the GSE onset.
9. The electroluminescent device as described in claim 3, whereby an operational combination of (i) the material, (ii) the first reflectance, (iii) the second reflectance, and (iv) the cavity length at the GSE onset results in a low current density at the GSE onset.
10. The electroluminescent device as described in claim 1, wherein the GSE is with low onset.
11. The electroluminescent device as described in claim 2, wherein: the GSE is with low onset; and the cavity length is a multiple of a one-half optical wavelength.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(18) Overview:
(19) Gain saturated stimulated emission occurs when the stimulated emission path dominates the relation paths in a mode, and results in a substantially fixed level of population inversion.
(20) The gain saturated fixed inversion level can be made small by employing an optical configuration having a sufficiently large Q, and by employing materials that have sufficiently low absorption at the wavelength of light emitted by the stimulated emission.
(21) Gain saturated stimulated emission is made to occur with a small fixed excited state population, by employing a radiative transition for which the lower level is depopulated, in combination with an optical configuration having a sufficiently large Q.
(22) By employing a lower level that is rapidly depopulated, the device can produce light by gain saturated stimulation to a high level of output, limited only by the typically very fast rate of vibrational relaxation and electrical properties.
(23) Accomplishing the required level of depopulation and low onset current density is then a matter of designing the device to have an appropriate emitter affording such a transition, the use of appropriate mirrors to allow for sufficient reflectivity and sufficiently low loss for transmitted light leaving the cavity, in combination with a long enough cavity, and the absence of losses inside the cavity that would compete with stimulated emission.
(24) A benefit of stimulated emission, and more so, gain saturated stimulated emission is that light is produced essentially entirely in a mode. Where that mode is the so-called vertical mode, light extraction is inherently close to 100%. The OLED industry has worked for decades to improve light extraction, typically using elaborately textured substrates and other features. The present invention obviates that issue in entirety.
(25) A benefit of gain saturated stimulated emission with a small excited state population, is that onset can occur at low current density, or at low pump level. The reduces the voltage and charge density at onset and thereby attenuates effects that were previously thought to inhibit onset.
(26) Another benefit of gain saturated stimulated emission with a small excited state population, is that quenching processes and degradation processes are attenuated and remain attenuated as power is increased.
(27) Thus, a benefit of the present invention is that light can be produced with near ideal efficiency with attenuated losses and with attenuated degradation of the emitter and other materials so that the device can operate at high power and have a longer lifetime.
(28) Gain saturation thus provides an operating condition where energy, whether electrical or optical, added to the device after reaching gain saturation, is converted almost entirely into light in a mode, while losses remain essentially constant. While this condition is maintained, the efficiency of the device in effect approaches its ideal limit as power is increased, notably with the exception of heat losses driven by the electrical current in the case of conventional LED lasers.
(29) Molecular materials, and to some extent polymeric materials, offer a different situation. As a result of a Stokes shift and/or Kasha's rule, absorption and emission spectra partially overlap and are near symmetrical opposites of each other around a central wavelength. This creates the possibility of radiative transition to a rapidly depopulated lower energy state level, for example a vibrational excited state in the electronic ground state.
(30) A minimal population inversion for stimulated emission, then corresponds to a small excited state population, minimally in excess of that of the depopulated level. Gain saturation then can produce a fixed inversion that corresponds to a small excited state population minimally in excess of that of the depopulated lower energy level.
(31) For molecular materials, for example organic molecules, Kasha's rule states that relaxation from an electronic state occurs in appreciable yield from the lowest energy vibrational state of that electronic level, to the vibrational levels of the lower electronic energy state for all of the allowed such transitions.
(32) Since the population of a vibrational level within an electronic state, follows a Boltzman distribution, the population of a higher energy vibrational level is exponentially smaller compared to a lower energy vibrational state.
(33) Thus, operating at a wavelength that corresponds to a transition to a suitably high energy vibrational level in the lower electronic state provides the possibility of stimulated emission and then gain saturation, with a small excited state population.
(34) Since the gain saturated inversion, and hence the excited state population in gain saturation, is controlled by the relaxation rate of the radiative transition, and by the cavity lifetime, the second part of the solution to achieving gain saturated emission with a small nearly constant excited state population is to provide an optical configuration with sufficient Q.
(35) Having achieved this goal, onset of gain saturation can proceed at minimum electrical input, and minimum excited state population, thus minimizing higher order losses at onset. Once onset is achieved, these losses remain small as power is added and light output increases nearly exclusively in the vertical mode, thus leading to near ideal efficiency.
(36) A more specific and quantitative description of this invention follows.
(37) An example emitter is shown in
(38) The spectra can be understood in relation to the Jablonski diagram shown in
(39) For an electrically driven device such as an OLED, the process for producing light from electricity by spontaneous emission may proceed as in
(40) It might be noted that both spontaneous emission and stimulated emission, and also absorption, are processes whose rates depend in part on optical boundary conditions. In modern terms, these processes are described in the context of an optical mode of the device by a rate equation,
(41)
where P.sub.k is the photon density in mode k, β.sub.k is the fraction of spontaneous emission into mode k, g.sub.k is the coefficient for stimulated emission in mode k, and for absorption of photons from mode k, and N.sub.2 is the population of the upper electronic level, N.sub.1,v is the population of vibrational level in the electronic state, and T.sub.k is the rate of photon loss from mode k, generally the rate at which light leaves the cavity as output.
(42) By convention, β.sub.k is normalized such that
(43)
so that N.sub.2/τ.sub.sp is the total rate of spontaneous emission in all directions. Often, β.sub.k in the vertical mode, that is, the mode coupled to the desired light output, is small, at order 0.01 or smaller. Adding modes near the vertical, can total to about 20% of the light produced, with the remainder going into wave guide modes and transverse directions.
(44) In the absence of stimulated emission, that is, when spontaneous emission is the dominant relaxation path, β.sub.kN.sub.2/τ.sub.sp>>g.sub.kP.sub.k(N.sub.2−N.sub.1,v) for all k, it is readily seen that light output from each mode is proportional to the excited state population,
(45)
Thus, in order to increase output from spontaneous emission, the population of the excited state must be increased.
(46) This is readily seen to be disadvantageous in several ways. Since this relation holds for all of the optical modes in the device, light losses increase proportionally with output. Where the excited state is subject to quenching, by charge or other interactions, efficiency decreases worse than linearly with output. And, where the excited state is reactive, degradation increases at least linearly with output.
(47) Continuing with this simple model with two electronic states, charge density and the excited state population are related to each other and the electric current input by,
(48)
where γ is a factor for the recombination current, e is the unit electric charge, V is the effective volume, k.sub.eh is recombination rate constant, and charge balance is assumed, q=[e]=[h], and the ellipses refer to a variety of loss and secondary processes. For our two level model, units can be chosen such that N.sub.1+N.sub.2=1. It is readily apparent that charge density for each of the carriers increases more rapidly than the excitation level, thus exacerbating quenching losses and efficiency roll-off.
(49) The above situation is altered in a profound way when the stimulated emission term is the dominant path in any mode, g.sub.kP.sub.k (N.sub.2−N.sub.1,v)>>β.sub.kN.sub.2/τ.sub.sp, for any mode k. In that case, our modal rate equations give us
(50)
so that the inversion level is constant and controlled by stimulated emission coefficient and the cavity lifetime. The Einstein A, B relations allows the expression of the stimulated emission coefficient in terms of the spontaneous emission lifetime and optical parameters, and using the relationship between Q and cavity lifetime yields
(51)
(52) Under conditions where is sufficiently small, the relationship between current and light becomes to good approximation,
(53)
where N.sub.2.sup.(sat) is the gain saturated population. And the onset current for reaching gain saturation becomes
(54)
(55) Thus, for a suitably chosen emitter, positioned favorably (generally near an anti-node) in an optical configuration that provides a sufficiently large Q, the onset current is controlled largely by the wavelength and optical configuration.
(56) Notably, where gain saturated results in a constant excitation level, charge carrier density increases slower than current and light output, q∝√{square root over (I)}.
(57) An example of the type of stimulated emission process used in this invention is shown in
(58) The population of the lower level of the radiative transition N.sub.1,v is related to the energy of that vibrational level above the lowest vibrational level as
(59)
where for our application, N.sub.1,0 is generally close to 1.
(60) As an example, an emitter with emission to the lowest energy vibrational level at 436 nm, and a radiative transition emitting light at 497 nm, the energy difference is 340 meV, and the population of that vibrational level in the electronic ground state is about 10.sup.−6/molecule at room temperature.
(61) For convenience, thermal population versus energy difference is graphed in
(62) The spectrum shown in
(63) Further, the invention provides a means of enhancing the performance of TADF emitters by rapidly draining the singlet excited state population. In some TADF emitters, the triplet is in equilibrium with the singlet and is thereby drained as well. And, in some TADF emitters, the invention acts to attenuate forward crossing so that reverse crossing runs unopposed.
Specific Embodiments
(64) The goals of the optical configuration are to reduce the population of the excited state N.sub.2 in gain saturation to close to that of the lower level in the radiative transition, N.sub.1,v. Therefore, Q is ideally wanted to be sufficiently large that the gain saturated fixed inversion level N.sub.2−N.sub.1,v is similar to or smaller than N.sub.1,v.
(65) As Q is increased, the onset current density is reduced until the excited state population has been reduced to this level.
(66) For purposes of illustration, consider the model cavity shown in
(67) Light exits the cavity through the exit mirror having reflectance R.sub.1, while the back mirror has reflectance R.sub.2. However, the invention can also be implemented with light exiting both mirrors. And the invention can also be implemented with light exiting neither mirror, for example instead being coupled to an adjacent resonator as is sometimes done in photonics.
(68) The quality factor Q for such a cavity, with small absorption losses in the cavity, may be calculated by,
(69)
where the leading term represents the optical length of the cavity divided by the free space wavelength, and the second term is the finesse F of the cavity. A useful understanding of these terms is that Q=λ/Δλ and F=δλ/Δλ, where δλ is the separation between resonances.
(70) The relationship between Q and the product of the reflectances for a one wavelength cavity is shown in
(71) Note that the curve in
(72) Notably, a device with an 86% (or less) mirror and a one wavelength cavity has a Q under 50. Thus, devices with an Al mirror have inadequate Q for low onset, unless the cavity is significantly lengthened.
(73) It should also be noted, that even in devices where one of the mirrors has a very high reflectance for example as might be provided by a distributed Bragg reflector (DBR), Q is still limited by the lower reflectance mirror and the cavity length. Several examples of devices with a DBR exit mirror and Al cathode as the back mirror, have appeared in the scientific literature dating to the early and mid 90's. None were capable of onset with a feasible input.
(74) An important novelty of the present invention, compared to earlier devices, is that Q is increased by increasing cavity length, when either mirror does not provide very high reflectance sufficient to achieve sufficient Q.
(75) The inversion population in gain saturation, as a function of Q, is shown for two values of the spontaneous emission rate, in
(76) Note that for our example with N.sub.1,v, ≈10.sup.−6/molecule, and a spontaneous emission lifetime of about 4 ns, an ideal optical configuration would provide Q≈1,000.
(77) As shown in Eq. 7, with the device engineered to provide onset of gain saturation with a sufficiently small excited state population, losses at onset can be small and the onset current density to reasonable approximation becomes a function of the wavelength, molecular dimensions (or effective volume), and optical configuration, that is, Q.
(78) Onset current density as a function of Q for three different wavelengths assuming typical molecular size of common OLED emitters, is shown in
(79) It might be noted in these examples that a larger Q will not significantly further reduce the gain saturated excited state population or onset current, since the lower bound on N.sub.2 is set by the population of the vibrational level in the lower electronic state, N.sub.1,v.
(80) Also, the efficiency of the device, apart from losses in the exit mirror is set by the energy of the operating transition divided by the 0-0 transition. Thus there is a small trade off between onset current or excited state population, and efficiency.
(81) Consequently, values of Q sufficient to achieve low onset are not readily supplied by a simple arrangement of metal mirrors in a one wavelength or half wavelength cavity. Thus, devices described in the literature, or otherwise known to date, are not sufficient to achieve this goal.
(82) In the following, OLED stack refers to any set of layers or layer, functioning in combination with electrodes as an electroluminescent device. For example, OLED stack may refer to a set of layers comprising a hole injection layer, a hole transport layer, an emitter layer, an electron transport layer, and an electron injection layer, which in addition to the electrodes, functions as an OLED. OLED stack can also refer to a single layer device where one layer provides all of the functions.
(83) In all of the following, optimal operation is obtained with an emitting region located in the vicinity of an antinode.
(84) In the following, multiples of the resonant wavelength will refer to an optical length that is a multiple of the resonant wavelength in steps of half wavelength, i.e. 1λ, 1½λ, 2λ, 2½λ, etc.
(85) In the following, configurations are shown as bottom emitting devices. However it will be readily understood that the intended range of devices claimed in this invention includes the top emitting versions of each of these devices, where the reflectivities of the mirrors are simply reversed, or the mirror positions are reversed, along with optical transition layers as appropriate.
(86) Moreover, claimed configurations include, without limitation, all of the following where the top electrode is the cathode and the bottom is the anode, and also the reverse where the top electrode is the anode and the bottom electrode is the cathode.
(87)
(88)
(89)
(90)
(91)
(92)
(93)
(94) Suitable materials for the transition layer include but are not limited LiF, NPB, Alq3.
(95) It is understood that in the above, the illustrated embodiments are schematic and apply to a wide variety of materials and dimensions. Further, techniques and equipment needed to fabricate OLEDs according to these schematic embodiments are well known in the prior art.
(96) Although this invention has been described with a certain degree of particularity, it is to be understood that the present disclosure has been made only by way of illustration and that numerous changes in the details of construction and arrangement of parts may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.