PROTECTIVE GLASS PLATE WITH THE PROPERTY OF IMPACT STRESS RESISTANCE

20210380467 · 2021-12-09

Assignee

Inventors

Cpc classification

International classification

Abstract

A protective glass plate with the property of impact stress resistance, and the composition for making the protective glass plate comprising the following components by mass percent: SiO.sub.2: 59-63.5%, Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 11.5-16.5%, Na.sub.2O: 11.5-15.5%, K.sub.2O: 0.8-6%, MgO: 4-8.5%, B.sub.2O.sub.3: 0-1.0%, and ZrO.sub.2: 0%; when 0.3 mm<T<2.0 mm, and 0.5h≤t≤8h, CS satisfies the following relationship: 9.597Ln(t)+710≤CS≤−5.299t.sup.2+50.28t+765; when 2.0 mm≤T≤4.0 mm, and 4h≤t≤150h, CS satisfies the following relationship: 0.003t.sup.2−2.167t+858≤CS≤−61.4Ln(t)+1060; wherein T is the thickness of the glass plate and has the unit of mm; t is the chemical strengthening time and has the unit of h; and CS is the surface compressive stress generated by chemical strengthening and has the unit of MPa. The protective glass plate has an excellent property of impact resistance, and the maximum glass fragment size of the broken glass may be controlled within the range of 10-30 mm in length and 1-3 mm in width, thus it is applicable for large-scale industrial production.

Claims

1. A protective glass plate with the property of impact stress resistance, characterized in that the composition for making the ass plate comprises the following components by mass percent: SiO.sub.2: 59-63.5%, Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 11.5-16.5%, Na.sub.2O: 11.5-15.5%, K.sub.2O: 0.8-6%, MgO: 4-8.5%, B.sub.2O.sub.3: 0-1.0%, and ZrO.sub.2: 0%; when 0.3 mm<T<2.0 mm, and 0.5 h≤t≤8 h, CS satisfies the following relationship:
9.597Ln(t)+710≤CS≤−5.299t.sup.2+50.28t+765; wherein T is the thickness of the glass plate and has the unit of mm; t is the chemical strengthening time and has the unit of h; and CS is the surface compressive stress generated by chemical strengthening and has the unit of MPa.

2. The protective glass plate according to claim 1, characterized in that the composition for making the glass plate comprises B.sub.2O.sub.3: 0.2-0.7% by mass percent.

3. The protective glass plate according to claim 1, characterized in that the glass thickness is 0.3 mm≤T≤1.1 mm, preferably 0.6 mm≤T≤0.9 mm.

4. The protective glass plate according to claim 1, characterized in that the composition for making the glass plate comprises the following components by mass percent: SiO.sub.2: 59.5-62.5%, Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 13.1-16.5%, Na.sub.2O: 12.5-14.8%, K.sub.2O: 0.8-5.8%, MgO: 5-7.5%, and B.sub.2O.sub.3: 0.2-0.7%; preferably SiO.sub.2: 59.8-61.6%, Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 13.8-15.8%, Na.sub.2O: 12.8-14.5%, K.sub.2O: 4.5-5.8%, MgO: 5.1-7.2%, and B.sub.2O.sub.3: 0.4-0.6%.

5. The protective glass plate according to claim 1, characterized in that the tempering temperature is 380-450° C.

6. The glass plate according to claim 1, characterized in that the ratio of K.sub.2O/Al.sub.2O.sub.3 in the composition for making the glass plate should not be greater than 0.5, preferably not greater than 0.35.

7. The glass plate according to claim 1, characterized in that the maximum fragment size of the broken glass plate is: 10-30 mm in length, and 1-3 mm in width; preferably 10-20 mm in length, and 1-2 mm in width.

8. A protective glass plate with the property of impact stress resistance, characterized in that the composition for making the ass plate comprises the following components by mass percent: SiO.sub.2: 59-63.5%, Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 11.5-16.5%, Na.sub.2O: 11.5-15.5%, K.sub.2O: 0.8-6%, MgO: 4-8.5%, B.sub.2O.sub.3: 0-1.0%, and ZrO.sub.2: 0%; when 2.0 mm≤T≤4.0 mm, and 4 h≤t≤150 h, CS satisfies the following relationship:
0.003t.sup.2−2.167t+858≤CS≤−61.4Ln(t)+1060; wherein T is the thickness of the glass plate and has the unit of mm; t is the chemical strengthening time and has the unit of h; and CS is the surface compressive stress generated by chemical strengthening and has the unit of MPa.

9. The protective glass plate according to claim 8, characterized in that the composition for making the glass plate comprises B.sub.2O.sub.3: 0.2-0.7% by mass percent.

10. The protective glass plate according to claim 8, characterized in that the glass thickness is 2.5 mm≤T≤3.5 mm.

11. The protective glass plate according to claim 8, characterized in that the composition for making the glass plate comprises the following components by mass percent: SiO.sub.2: 59.5-62.5%, Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 13.1-16.5%, Na.sub.2O: 12.5-14.8%, K.sub.2O: 0.8-5.8%, MgO: 5-7.5%, and B.sub.2O.sub.3: 0.2-0.7%; preferably SiO.sub.2: 59.8-61.6%, Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 13.8-15.8%, Na.sub.2O: 12.8-14.5%, K.sub.2O: 4.5-5.8%, MgO: 5.1-7.2%, and B.sub.2O.sub.3: 0.4-0.6%.

12. The protective glass plate according to claim 8, characterized in that the tempering temperature is 400-450° C., preferably 420° C.

13. The glass plate according to claim 8, characterized in that the ratio of K.sub.2O/Al.sub.2O.sub.3 in the composition for making the glass plate should not be greater than 0.5, preferably not greater than 0.35.

14. The glass plate according to claim 8, characterized in that the maximum fragment size of the broken glass plate is: 10-30 mm in length, and 1-3 mm in width; preferably 10-20 mm in length, and 1-2 mm in width.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0050] FIG. 1 is the pictures of the glass fragmentation effect in the falling ball tests of Examples 8-1 to 8-6;

[0051] FIG. 2 is the pictures of the glass fragmentation effect in the falling ball tests of Examples 8-7 to 8-12.

SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS

[0052] As used in the present application, the term “surface compressive stress (CS)” means when the glass is chemically strengthened, it is placed in a molten salt so that the cations having a smaller radius on the surface layer of the glass exchange with the cations having a larger radius in the molten salt. Finally, a compressive stress layer is formed on the two outer surfaces of the glass, and a compressive stress is formed on the surface of the ordinary glass. The strengthened glass first offsets the surface compressive stress when it is subjected to external forces, thereby improving the bearing capacity and enhancing the glass's own resistance to wind pressure, cold and hot, impact and so on. The compressive stress layer is the “surface compressive stress layer” of chemically strengthened glass.

[0053] As used in the present application, the term “depth of compressive stress layer (DOL)” refers to the depth at which the cations having a larger radius in the molten salt exchange with the cations having a smaller radius in the glass during the chemical strengthening process of the glass.

[0054] As used in the present application, the term “chemical strengthening time (t)” refers to the time for the glass to undergo chemical strengthening treatment, i.e., the time for the cations having a larger radius in the molten salt to exchange with the cations having a smaller radius in the glass.

[0055] One technical solution according to the present application is: a protective glass plate with the property of impact stress resistance, by mass percent, comprises: SiO.sub.2: 59-63.5%, Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 13.1-16.5%, Na.sub.2O: 11.5-15.5%, K.sub.2O: 0.8-6%, MgO: 5-7.5%, B.sub.2O.sub.3: 0-1.0%, and ZrO.sub.2: 0%. Its thickness (T) is greater than 0.3 mm and less than 2 mm; the chemical strengthening time t is greater than or equal to 0.5 hours and less than or equal to 8 hours; the chemical strengthening temperature is: 380-450° C.; and the surface compressive stress value (CS) after chemical strengthening satisfies the relationship: 9.597Ln(t)+710≤CS≤−5.299t.sup.2+50.28t+765, wherein Ln is the natural logarithm. After a certain time of chemical strengthening, for the two expressions of the endpoints, the values at that time are calculated respectively, and the surface compressive stress (CS) of the glass plate is between the two values.

[0056] The surface compressive stress (CS) is preferably 700 MPa or more and not more than 850 MPa, more preferably 750 MPa or more and not more than 850 MPa; the depth of compressive stress layer (DOL) is preferably 30 μm or more, more preferably 35 μm or more.

[0057] As a preferred technical solution, the thickness of the glass is greater than or equal to 0.6 mm and less than or equal to 0.9 mm.

[0058] In addition, as a technical solution of the present application, the protective glass plate with the property of impact stress resistance, by mass percent, comprises: SiO.sub.2: 59.5-62.5%, Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 13.8-15.8%, Na.sub.2O: 11.5-15.5%, K.sub.2O: 4.5-5.8%, MgO: 5-7.5%, B.sub.2O.sub.3: 0.4-0.6%, and ZrO.sub.2: 0%.

[0059] As a preferred technical solution, the ratio of K.sub.2O to Al.sub.2O.sub.3 in the glass plate is less than or equal to 0.5; and the size of the maximum fragment for the broken glass is: 10-20 mm in length, and 1-2 mm in width.

[0060] Another technical solution of the present application is: a protective glass plate with the property of impact stress resistance, by mass percent, it comprises: SiO.sub.2: 59-63.5%, Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 13.1-16.5%, Na.sub.2O: 11.5-15.5%, K.sub.2O: 0.8-6%, MgO: 5-7.5%, B.sub.2O.sub.3: 0-1.0%, and ZrO.sub.2: 0%. Its thickness (T) is greater than or equal to 2 mm and less than or equal to 4 mm; the chemical strengthening time t is greater than or equal to 4 hours and less than or equal to 150 hours; the chemical strengthening temperature is 400-450° C.; and the surface compressive stress value (CS) after chemical strengthening satisfies the relationship: 0.003t.sup.2−2.167t+858≤CS≤−61.4Ln(t)+1060, wherein Ln is the natural logarithm. After a certain time of chemical strengthening, for the two expressions of the endpoints, the values at that time are calculated respectively, and the surface compressive stress (CS) of the glass plate is between the two values.

[0061] The surface compressive stress (CS) is preferably 800 MPa or more and not more than 950 MPa, more preferably 850 MPa or more and not more than 950 MPa; the depth of compressive stress layer (DOL) is preferably 55 μm or more, more preferably 80 μm or more.

[0062] As a preferred technical solution, the thickness of the glass is greater than or equal to 2.5 mm and less than or equal to 3.5 mm.

[0063] In addition, as a technical solution of the present application, the protective glass plate with the property of impact stress resistance, by mass percent, comprises: SiO.sub.2: 59.5-62.5%, Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 13.8-15.8%, Na.sub.2O: 11.5-15.5%, K.sub.2O: 4.5-5.8%, MgO: 5-7.5%, B.sub.2O.sub.3: 0.4-0.6%, and ZrO.sub.2: 0%.

[0064] As a preferred technical solution, the ratio of K.sub.2O to Al.sub.2O.sub.3 in the glass plate is less than or equal to 0.5; and the size of the maximum fragment for the broken glass is: 10-20 mm in length, and 1-2 mm in width.

[0065] The glass plate according to the present application is a glass plate obtained by chemically strengthening the plate glass prepared by mixing various raw materials according to the ratio.

[0066] The method for manufacturing the plate glass according to the present application is as follows: firstly after various of the components are mixed according to the ratio of each component in the material formula, the prepared raw material is heated and melted at a high temperature, and the melting temperature is 1500-1650° C., and finally the molten glass is formed. The molten glass is poured into a metal mold preheated to 550-700° C., putting the glass together with the metal mold into an annealing furnace for annealing and cooling. The annealing temperature is 630-650° C., remaining at this temperature for 30-60 minutes; then the temperature is naturally lowered to 120-80° C. to obtain the plate glass of the present application.

[0067] The chemical strengthening method is not particularly limited, as long as ion-exchange may be carried out between Na.sub.2O on the surface layer of the glass plate and K.sub.2O in the molten salt, for example, a method of immersing the glass plate in heated potassium nitrate (KNO.sub.3) molten salt.

[0068] Glass components, ion exchange temperature and time are the main factors that affect the strength of ion exchange. Glass components and the content of each component have different effects on ion exchange. Hereinafter, the components of the glass according to the present application will be described first, and the content of each component is expressed by mass percent.

[0069] SiO.sub.2 is a component that constitutes the skeleton of glass and is essential. When the content of SiO.sub.2 is less than 58%, the stability and hardness of glass are low, or the weather resistance is low; preferably the content of SiO.sub.2 is 59% or more, more preferably 59.5% or more, and most preferably 59.8% or more. When the content of SiO.sub.2 exceeds 65%, the viscosity of glass increases, and the meltability decreases; preferably the content of SiO.sub.2 is 63.5% or less, more preferably 62.5% or less, and most preferably 61.6% or less.

[0070] Al.sub.2O.sub.3 is a component that increases the ion exchange rate and is essential. When it is less than 11.5%, the ion exchange rate is low. It is preferably 11.5% or more, more preferably 13.1% or more, most preferably 13.8% or more. When the content of Al.sub.2O.sub.3 exceeds 18%, the viscosity of the glass increases and homogeneous melting becomes difficult. It is preferably 16.5% or less, most preferably 15.8% or less.

[0071] Na.sub.2O is a component that forms a surface compressive stress layer by ion exchange and improves the meltability of glass, and is essential. When the content of Na.sub.2O is less than 10%, it is difficult to form a desired surface compressive stress layer by ion exchange; preferably the content of Na.sub.2O is 11.5% or more, more preferably 12.5% or more, and typically 12.8% or more. When the content of Na.sub.2O exceeds 16%, the strain point of glass decreases with Tg (glass transition temperature), or the weather resistance is low; preferably the content of Na.sub.2O is 15.5% or less, more preferably 14.8% or less, and typically 14.5% or less.

[0072] K.sub.2O is a component that may increase the transparency and gloss of glass, and improve the meltability of glass. It is also a component used to increase the ion exchange rate in chemical strengthening so as to obtain the desired CS and DOL, and is essential. When the content of K.sub.2O is less than 0.5%, the meltability is low, or the ion exchange rate is low; preferably the content of K.sub.2O is 0.8% or more, and typically 4.5% or more. When the content of K.sub.2O exceeds 7%, the weather resistance is low; preferably the content of K.sub.2O is 6% or less, and typically 5.8% or less.

[0073] MgO is a component that weakens the reduction of the ion exchange rate, and the glass is necessary to comprise at least 2% of MgO. When the content of MgO is less than 2%, the meltability of glass decreases; preferably the content of MgO is 4% or more, more preferably 5% or more, and typically 5.1% or more. When the content of MgO exceeds 10%, the ion exchange rate is low; preferably the content of MgO is 8.5% or less, more preferably 7.5% or less, and typically 7.2% or less.

[0074] The content of B.sub.2O.sub.3 may be 1% or less in order to improve the meltability or glass strength at high temperatures. If the content of B.sub.2O.sub.3 exceeds 1%, it may be difficult to obtain a homogeneous glass, and it may become difficult to form the glass; preferably the content of B.sub.2O.sub.3 is 0.7% or less, more preferably 0.6% or less; and preferably the content of B.sub.2O.sub.3 is 0.2% or more, more preferably 0.4% or more.

[0075] In a particular embodiment, the ratios of each component in Group 1 are shown in Table 1, SiO.sub.2: 59-63.5%, Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 13.8-15.8%, Na.sub.2O: 11.5-15.5%, K.sub.2O: 3.1-5.8%, MgO: 4-8.5%, B.sub.2O.sub.3: 0-0.8%, and ZrO.sub.2: 0%; wherein the content of Al.sub.2O.sub.3 is 13.8-15.8%, which is the most preferred content. Al.sub.2O.sub.3 may increase the ion exchange rate; and the viscosity of the glass within the above content range of Al.sub.2O.sub.3 is moderate, thereby facilitating homogeneous melting. The tempered glass prepared in this embodiment has a high single-point falling ball height and high impact resistance strength of the glass.

[0076] In a particular embodiment, the ratios of each component in Group 3 are shown in Table 1, SiO.sub.2: 59-63.5%, Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 11.5-16.5%, Na.sub.2O: 12.8-14.5%, K.sub.2O: 3.1-5.8%, MgO: 4-8.5%, B.sub.2O.sub.3: 0-0.8%, and ZrO.sub.2: 0%; wherein the content of Na.sub.2O is 12.8-14.5%, which is the most preferred content. Na.sub.2O may form the surface compressive stress layer of tempered glass; and the glass within the above content range of Na.sub.2O has high meltability and weather resistance, and the strain point of glass will not decrease with Tg (glass transition temperature). The tempered glass prepared in this embodiment has large surface compressive stress, large depth of the compressive stress layer, high single-point falling ball height, and high impact resistance strength of the glass.

[0077] In a particular embodiment, the ratios of each component in Group 9 are shown in Table 1, SiO.sub.2: 59.5-62.5%, Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 13.5-16.3%, Na.sub.2O: 11.5-15.5%, K.sub.2O: 0.8-5.8%, MgO: 5.1-7.2%, B.sub.2O.sub.3: 0-1%, and ZrO.sub.2: 0%; wherein the content of MgO is 5.1-7.2%, which is the most preferred content. MgO may weaken the reduction of the ion exchange rate; and the glass within the above content range of MgO has high meltability and slow reduction in ion exchange rate. The tempered glass prepared in this embodiment has good strengthening performance, large surface compressive stress and depth of stress layer, high single-point falling ball height, and good impact resistance strength of the glass.

EXAMPLES

[0078] Hereinafter, the present application will be further described in detail with reference to the Examples, but the embodiments of the present application are not limited thereto.

[0079] According to the ratios of each component in Examples 1-7 in Table 1, the glass plates with different component contents are obtained. At the same time, the ratios of each component in Comparative Examples 1-5 are also given.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Number SiO.sub.2 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 Na.sub.2O K.sub.2O MgO B.sub.2O.sub.3 K.sub.2O/Al.sub.2O.sub.3 1 59 15.6 11.5 5.8 7.9 0.2 0.37 2 60.5 14.8 15.5 5.1 4 0.1 0.34 3 63.5 11.5 14.4 4.2 5.6 0.8 0.37 4 60.6 15.8 14.5 4.5 4.6 0 0.28 5 61.3 16.5 12.8 0.9 8.5 0 0.05 6 62.5 13.8 13.7 0.8 8.2 1 0.06 7 60.3 12.6 12.8 6 7.8 0.5 0.48 8 60.4 13.5 13.3 5.9 6.9 0 0.44 9 62.3 16.1 15 0.9 5.7 0 0.06 10 62.8 14.9 13.9 3.6 4.8 0 0.24 11 58 9 16.4 7.5 8.2 0.9 0.83 12 62.5 10 15.8 6.5 5.2 0 0.65 13 64.5 13.5 16.6 0.4 4.2 0.8 0.03 14 61.8 14.5 5.9 7.8 9.8 0.2 0.54 15 62.2 18 12.5 5.4 0.7 1.2 0.30 16 56.4 15.5 14.5 5.8 7.8 0 0.37 17 62.7 9.6 14.8 4.5 8.2 0.2 0.47 18 62.4 14.5 10.2 5.2 7.6 0.1 0.36 19 63.2 15.8 13.3 0.5 7.2 0 0.03 20 60.5 13.8 11.8 4.1 9.6 0.2 0.30 21 61.6 14.2 12.6 5.6 4.5 1.5 0.39

[0080] 1. The specific preparation process of the glass plates of a group of Examples and Comparative Examples is as follows: firstly mixing various components with the ratios of each component in the above Table 1; at the same time, putting the mixed raw material into a sealed bag, mixing well in the sealed bag, and pouring it into a platinum crucible to melt; then putting the platinum crucible into a GWL-1600TS high-temperature melting furnace to melt at a temperature of 1620° C.; pouring the molten glass into a metal mold, and putting the glass together with the metal mold into the annealing furnace for precision annealing and cooling at a temperature of 630° C., and remaining at this temperature for 30 minutes; then naturally cooling the temperature to 40° C., a glass with the thickness of Table 2 is obtained. Then the glass is cut and ground into small samples of 50 mm×50 mm and 100 mm×80 mm. For each type of glass, 20 pieces of samples of the two sizes are produced. Finally, chemical strengthening is performed in molten salt of potassium nitrate according to the chemical strengthening conditions in Table 2, the glass plates of Examples A1-A10 and Comparative Examples A11-A21 are respectively obtained.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Glass thickness Chemical strengthening Number (mm) conditions Example A1 1.5 380° C., 8 h Example A2 1.5 380° C., 6 h Example A3 1.1 380° C., 5 h Example A4 1.0 400° C., 5 h Example A5 1.0 400° C., 4.5 h Example A6 0.8 420° C., 4 h Example A7 0.7 420° C., 3.5 h Example A8 0.7 450° C., 2 h Example A9 0.55 450° C., 1 h Example A10 0.5 450° C., 0.5 h Comparative Example A11 1.5 380° C., 8 h Comparative Example A12 1.0 400° C., 5 h Comparative Example A13 0.8 420° C., 4 h Comparative Example A14 0.7 450° C., 2 h Comparative Example A15 0.5 450° C., 0.5 h Comparative Example A16 1.5 360° C., 8 h Comparative Example A17 1.0 370° C., 5 h Comparative Example A18 0.8 420° C., 0.4 h Comparative Example A19 0.7 450° C., 0.4 h Comparative Example A20 0.5 450° C., 0.3 h Comparative Example A21 0.5 450° C., 0.2 h

[0081] When 0.3 mm<T<2.0 mm, and 0.5 h≤t≤8 h. CS satisfies the following relationship (I):


9.597Ln(t)+710≤CS≤−5.299t.sup.2+50.28t+765;

[0082] wherein T is the thickness of the glass plate and has the unit of mm; t is the chemical strengthening time and has the unit of h; CS is the surface compressive stress generated by chemical strengthening and has the unit of MPa; and Ln is the natural logarithm.

[0083] Table 3 shows the first and last values of the range of the surface compressive stress (CS) for the glass within the thickness range calculated according to the above relational formula (1) after chemically strengthening for the following time.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Chemical strengthening time (h) 9.597Ln(t) + 710 −5.299t.sup.2 + 50.28t + 765 8 730 828.1 6 727.2 875.9 5 725.4 883.9 4.5 724.4 884 4 723.3 881.3 3.5 722 876.1 2 716.7 844.4 1 710 810 0.5 703.3 788.8

[0084] After chemically strengthening each small sample with a size of 50 mm×50 mm in various Examples and Comparative Examples, the surface compressive stress (CS) of each sample is measured with a chemical stress tester FSM-6000; and the detailed test results are shown in Table 4.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Surface compressive Depth of compressive stress (CS) (MPa), stress layer (DOL) average value (μm), average value Number of 20 pieces of 20 pieces Example A1 805 40 Example A2 815 38 Example A3 825 36 Example A4 832 35 Example A5 856 33 Example A6 854 32 Example A7 796 37 Example A8 788 38 Example A9 782 37 Example A10 710 32 Comparative Example A11 780 38 Comparative Example A12 795 32 Comparative Example A13 810 29 Comparative Example A14 778 35 Comparative Example A15 708 28 Comparative Example A16 798 34 Comparative Example A17 786 35 Comparative Example A18 745 27 Comparative Example A19 756 18 Comparative Example A20 774 32 Comparative Example A21 689 31

[0085] It can be seen from Table 4 that, in case that the chemical strengthening conditions and the glass thickness are basically the same, compared with the Comparative Examples, the surface compressive stress ofthe glass plate in the Examples ofthe present application may be increased by up to 5.5%, and the depth of compressive stress layer is obviously increased, up to 18%.

[0086] After chemically strengthening each small sample with a size of 100 mm×80 mm in various Examples and Comparative Examples, a single-point falling ball test is performed with a falling ball tester MK-9968. A 130 g steel ball is used for single-point multiple falling ball test, with 15 cm of base height, 3 times of center-point falling ball, rising 5 cm for each time until the glass is broken. 20 pieces of each sample are tested, and the detailed test results are shown in Table 5.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Single-point falling ball height (cm), Number average value of 20 pieces Example A1 70 Example A2 65 Example A3 60 Example A4 55 Example A5 55 Example A6 50 Example A7 45 Example A8 45 Example A9 45 Example A10 40 Comparative Example A11 20 Comparative Example A12 25 Comparative Example A13 25 Comparative Example A14 30 Comparative Example A15 30 Comparative Example A16 30 Comparative Example A17 35 Comparative Example A18 25 Comparative Example A19 25 Comparative Example A20 30 Comparative Example A21 20

[0087] It can be seen from Table 5 that, in case that the chemical strengthening conditions and the glass thickness are basically the same, compared with the Comparative Examples, the single-point falling ball height of the glass plate in the Examples of the present application may increase by 50%-250%.

[0088] It can be seen from Table 4 and Table 5 that, in case that the chemical strengthening conditions and the glass thickness are basically the same, the surface compressive stress (CS), the depth of stress layer (DOL), and the single-point falling ball height of the glass plates with various components shown in Examples A1-A10 according to the present application is higher than that of the glass plates in the Comparative Examples. Although the Comparative Examples A11-A21 are strengthened with different chemical strengthening conditions, the surface compressive stress (CS) still satisfies the stress relationship given by the present application, which directly proves the rationality of this relationship. Furthermore, although the Comparative Examples A11-A21 satisfy the stress relationship, the contents of their components deviate from the corresponding range values given by the present application; and it can be seen from the falling ball test that the impact resistance ofthe glass plates ofthe Comparative Examples A1-A21 is relatively poor.

[0089] 2. The specific preparation process of the glass plates of another group of Examples and Comparative Examples is as follows: firstly mixing various components with the ratios of each component in the above Table 1; at the same time, putting the mixed raw material into a sealed bag, mixing well in the sealed bag, and pouring it into a platinum crucible to melt; then putting the platinum crucible into a GWL-1600TS high-temperature melting furnace to melt at a temperature of 1620° C.; pouring the molten glass into a metal mold, and putting the glass together with the metal mold into the annealing furnace for precision annealing and cooling at a temperature of 630° C., and remaining at this temperature for 30 minutes; then naturally cooling the temperature to 40° C., a glass with the thickness of Table 6 is obtained. Then the glass is cut and ground into small samples of 50 mm×50 mm, 20 pieces for each type of glass sample. Finally, chemical strengthening is performed in molten salt of potassium nitrate according to the chemical strengthening conditions in Table 6, the glass plates of Examples B1-B10 and Comparative Examples B11-B21 are respectively obtained.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Glass thickness Chemical strengthening Number (mm) conditions Example B1 4.0 400° C., 150 h Example B2 4.0 400° C., 120 h Example B3 3.5 410° C., 100 h Example B4 3.5 410° C., 90 h Example B5 3.0 420° C., 70 h Example B6 3.0 420° C., 50 h Example B7 2.5 430° C., 30 h Example B8 2.5 430° C., 10 h Example B9 2.0 440° C., 8 h Example B10 2.0 450° C., 8 h Comparative Example B11 4.0 400° C., 150 h Comparative Example B12 3.5 410° C., 100 h Comparative Example B13 3.0 420° C., 50 h Comparative Example B14 2.5 430° C., 30 h Comparative Example B15 2.0 450° C., 10 h Comparative Example B16 4.0 350° C., 150 h Comparative Example B17 3.5 360° C., 100 h Comparative Example B18 3.0 370° C., 50 h Comparative Example B19 2.5 380° C., 30 h Comparative Example B20 2.0 390° C., 10 h Comparative Example B21 2.0 390° C., 5 h

[0090] When 2.0 mm≤T≤4.0 mm, and 4 h≤t≤150 h, CS satisfies the following relationship (2):


0.003t.sup.2−2.167t+858≤CS≤−61.4Ln(t)+1060; [0091] wherein T is the thickness of the glass plate and has the unit of mm; t is the chemical strengthening time and has the unit of h; CS is the surface compressive stress generated by chemical strengthening and has the unit of MPa; and Ln is the natural logarithm.

[0092] Table 7 shows the first and last values of the range of the surface compressive stress (CS) for the glass within the thickness range calculated according to the above relational formula (2) after chemically strengthening for the following time.

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Chemical strengthening time (h) 0.003t.sup.2 − 2.167t + 858 −61.4Ln(t) + 1060 150 600.5 752.3 120 641.2 766.0 100 671.3 777.2 90 687.3 783.7 70 721.0 799.1 50 757.2 819.8 30 795.7 851.2 10 836.6 918.6 8 840.9 932.3

[0093] After chemically strengthening each small sample with a size of 50 mm×50 mm in various Examples and Comparative Examples, the surface compressive stress (CS) of each sample is measured with a chemical stress tester FSM-6000; and the detailed test results are shown in Table 8.

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Surface compressive Depth of compressive stress (CS) (MPa), stress layer (DOL) average value (μm), average value Number of 20 pieces of 20 pieces Example B1 660 166 Example B2 672 158 Example B3 698 147 Example B4 710 145 Example B5 742 137 Example B6 801 121 Example B7 831 102 Example B8 872 76 Example B9 902 58 Example B10 915 62 Comparative Example B11 610 142 Comparative Example B12 680 134 Comparative Example B13 782 110 Comparative Example B14 802 91 Comparative Example B15 856 59 Comparative Example B16 624 132 Comparative Example B17 650 112 Comparative Example B18 791 96 Comparative Example B19 815 86 Comparative Example B20 840 62 Comparative Example B21 875 48

[0094] It can be seen from Table 8 that, in case that the chemical strengthening conditions and glass thickness are basically the same, compared with the Comparative Examples, the surface compressive stress (CS) of the glass plates shown in Examples B1-B10 of the present application may be increased by up to 8.5%, and the depth of compressive stress layer (DOL) may be increased by up to 32%. Although the glass plates of the Comparative Examples B11-B21 are strengthened with different chemical strengthening conditions, the surface compressive stress (CS) still satisfies the stress relationship given by the present application.

[0095] It can also be seen from the comparison of the Examples and Comparative Examples in Table 8 that, the chemical strengthening temperature and time are important factors affecting the strength of the glass. The higher the chemical strengthening temperature and the longer the strengthening time, the stronger the strength of the glass and the better the impact resistance will be. In actual production, it is necessary to select the most suitable chemical strengthening conditions on the basis of time cost and process cost, so as to obtain chemically strengthened glass with excellent performance.

[0096] 3. Various components with the ratios of each component in Group 8 in the above Table 1 are mixed, at the same time, putting the mixed raw material into a sealed bag, mixing well in the sealed bag, and pouring it into a platinum crucible to melt; pouring the molten glass into a metal mold, and putting the glass together with the metal mold into the annealing furnace for precision annealing and cooling; then a glass with the thickness of Table 9 is obtained. Then the glass is cut and ground into small samples of 50 mm×50 mm and 145 mm×80 mm; wherein 20 pieces of the glass with a size of 50 mm×50 mm for each Example are produced, and 5 pieces of the glass with a size of 145 mm×80 mm for each Example are produced. Finally, chemical strengthening is respectively performed in molten salt of potassium nitrate according to the chemical strengthening conditions in Table 9.

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Glass thickness Chemical strengthening Number (mm) conditions Example 8-1 2.0 420° C., 4 h Example 8-2 2.0 420° C., 18 h Example 8-3 2.0 420° C., 48 h Example 8-4 2.0 420° C., 72 h Example 8-5 2.0 420° C., 96 h Example 8-6 2.0 420° C., 144 h Example 8-7 3.0 420° C., 4 h Example 8-8 3.0 420° C., 18 h Example 8-9 3.0 420° C., 48 h Example 8-10 3.0 420° C., 72 h Example 8-11 3.0 420° C., 96 h Example 8-12 3.0 420° C., 144 h

[0097] Table 10 shows the first and last values of the range of the surface compressive stress (CS) for the glass within the thickness range calculated according to the above relational formula (2) after chemically strengthening for the following time.

TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Chemical strengthening time (h) 0.003t.sup.2 − 2.167t + 858 −61.4Ln(t) + 1060 4 849.4 974.9 18 820.0 882.5 48 760.9 822.3 72 717.5 797.4 96 677.6 779.7 144 608.2 754.9

[0098] After chemically strengthening each of the small glass samples with a size of 50 mm×50 mm in Examples 8-1 to 8-12, the surface compressive stress (CS) of each sample is measured with a chemical stress tester FSM-6000, and the detailed test results are shown in Table 11.

TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Surface compressive Depth of compressive stress (CS) (MPa), stress layer (DOL) average value (μm), average value Number of 20 pieces of 20 pieces Example 8-1 932 42 Example 8-2 857 91 Example 8-3 803 128 Example 8-4 741 139 Example 8-5 693 148 Example 8-6 652 161 Example 8-7 921 42 Example 8-8 846 90 Example 8-9 796 126 Example 8-10 740 138 Example 8-11 681 145 Example 8-12 651 162

[0099] After chemically strengthening each small sample with a size of 145 mm×80 mm in various Examples, a single-point falling ball test is performed with a falling ball tester MK-9968. A 512 g steel ball is used for single-point multiple falling ball test, with 60 cm of base height, performing center-point falling ball until the glass is broken. 5 pieces of each sample are tested, finally recording the form of the glass and the size of maximum fragment of the broken glass. The detailed test results are shown in Table 12, as well as FIGS. 1-2.

TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Glass Chemical Size of maximum thickness strengthening fragment (length * Number (mm) conditions width), unit: mm Example 8-1 2.0 420° C., 4 h 30*1.0 Example 8-2 2.0 420° C., 18 h 25*2.0 Example 8-3 2.0 420° C., 48 h 17*1.0 Example 8-4 2.0 420° C., 72 h 14*1.5 Example 8-5 2.0 420° C., 96 h 12*1.0 Example 8-6 2.0 420° C., 144 h 10*1.0 Example 8-7 3.0 420° C., 4 h 43*4.0 Example 8-8 3.0 420° C., 18 h 30*3.0 Example 8-9 3.0 420° C., 48 h 25*3.0 Example 8-10 3.0 420° C., 72 h 24*3.0 Example 8-11 3.0 420° C., 96 h 23*2.0 Example 8-12 3.0 420° C., 144 h 21*3.0

[0100] It can be seen from Table 12 and FIGS. 1-2 that, for the broken glass having the components of the present application, the size of the glass strip or powder particle decreases with the increase of the ion exchange time (t), and the size of the glass fragments may be controlled in the range of: 10-30 mm in length and 1-3 mm in width.