Method and device for the in-situ determination of the temperature of a sample
20210381899 · 2021-12-09
Inventors
Cpc classification
H01L22/12
ELECTRICITY
G01J5/0007
PHYSICS
International classification
H01L21/67
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
The invention relates to a method and to a device for the in-situ determination of the temperature ϑ of a sample, in particular to a method and to a device for the surface-corrected determination of the temperature ϑ of a sample by means of the band-edge method.
It is provided that, for the in-situ determination of the temperature ϑ of a sample (10) when growing a layer stack (12) in a deposition system, a surface-corrected transmission spectrum T′(λ) is calculated by determining the quotient of the transmission spectrum T(λ) and a correction function K(λ), the correction function K(λ) being calculated from a determined reflection spectrum R(λ). Subsequently, the spectral position of the band-edge λ.sub.BE is determined from the transmission spectrum T′(λ), and the temperature ϑ is determined from the spectral position of the band-edge λ.sub.BE by means of a known dependency ϑ(λ.sub.BE).
Claims
1. A method for the in-situ determination of the temperature ϑ of a sample when growing a layer stack in a deposition system, comprising the following steps: a) transmitting a first optical radiation through the sample, wherein the first optical radiation has a first intensity spectrum I.sub.1(λ) which extends spectrally on either side of a band-edge of the sample, and measuring the radiation obtained after transmission through the sample in order to determine a transmission spectrum T(λ); b) irradiating a second optical radiation onto a surface of the sample to be coated, wherein the second optical radiation has a second intensity spectrum I.sub.2(λ) and the spectral range of the second optical radiation includes the spectral range of the first optical radiation, and measuring the radiation obtained after reflection from the surface in order to determine a reflection spectrum R(λ); c) calculating a surface-corrected transmission spectrum T′(λ) by determining the quotient of the transmission spectrum T(λ) and a correction function K(λ) according to formula (1)
T′(λ)=T(λ)/K(λ), (1) wherein the correction function K(λ) is calculated from the reflection spectrum R(λ); d) determining the spectral position of the band-edge λ.sub.BE from the transmission spectrum T′(λ); and e) determining the temperature ϑ from the spectral position of the band-edge λ.sub.BE by means of a known dependency ϑ(GIBE).
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the transmission spectrum T(λ) is a normalized transmission spectrum T.sub.norm(λ) and the reflection spectrum R(λ) is a normalized reflection spectrum R.sub.norm(λ).
3. The method of claim 1, wherein, when growing a layer stack made up of transparent layers, the correction function K(λ) is calculated according to formula (2)
4. The method of claim 1, wherein, when growing a layer stack made up of partially absorbing layers, the temperature ϑ is determined by means of a correction function K(λ), which is calculated by iteratively repeating steps c) to e), from the reflection spectrum R(λ) and a starting value ϑ.sub.0 for the temperature ϑ as parameters of a model for the layer stack that has already been applied, wherein a temperature determined during the iteration in step e) is used as the new temperature parameter for the model until the difference between the current value for the temperature ϑ.sub.i and the temperature ϑ.sub.i+1 determined thereby in step e) is below a specified threshold value.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the starting value ϑ.sub.0 for the temperature ϑ is the process temperature ϑ.sub.P of the deposition system, associated with the reflection spectrum R(λ).
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the dependency ϑ(λ.sub.BE) is at least approximately derived from a reference database in accordance with the material of the sample and the sample thickness d.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the dependency ϑ.sub.d1(λ.sub.BE) known for a predetermined sample thickness d.sub.1 is used for determining the dependency ϑ.sub.d2 (λ.sub.BE) for a sample thickness d.sub.2 that differs therefrom, by the dependency λ.sub.BE(ϑ) being ascertained using an emissivity-corrected pyrometer in a temperature range Δϑ which is covered both by the pyrometer and the method, and by the dependency ϑ.sub.d2(λ.sub.BE) being accordingly adapted in the temperature range outside Δϑ, which is only covered by the method according to the invention, from the progression of the known dependency ϑ.sub.d1(λ.sub.BE).
8. The method of claim 7, wherein, proceeding from a known dependency ϑ(λ.sub.BE) for known sample doping level, a corresponding dependency is ascertained for a sample having differing or unknown doping level.
9. A device for carrying out the method of claim 1, comprising: a) a second radiation source, configured to irradiate the second optical radiation onto the surface of the sample to be coated; b) a spectrometer, configured to determine the transmission spectrum T(λ) and a reflection spectrum R(λ); and c) an electronic data-processing apparatus, configured to carry out method steps c) to e) from claim 1 using the transmission spectrum T(λ) and the reflection spectrum R(λ) to determine the temperature ϑ.
10. The device according to claim 9, further comprising a first radiation source, configured to transmit the first optical radiation through the sample.
Description
DRAWINGS
[0057] Exemplary embodiments of the invention are explained in greater detail with reference to the drawings and the following description. In the drawings:
[0058]
[0059]
[0060]
[0061]
[0062]
[0063]
[0064]
EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
[0065]
[0066] The transmission spectrum T(λ) measured by the spectrometer 30 is composed of several components. These are a component A′.sub.1 having wavelengths λ<λ.sub.BE, a component A′.sub.2 having wavelengths λ>λ.sub.BE, and an additional interference component C′, which originates from a thermal MBE source, for example. The radiation A.sub.1 having wavelengths λ<λ.sub.BE is absorbed during transmission through the sample 10. However, the sample 10 likewise emits corresponding thermal radiation, such that this wavelength range appears in the measured transmission spectrum T(λ) as an interference signal in the background. The radiation A.sub.2 having wavelengths λ>λ.sub.BE is largely transmitted during transmission through the sample 10. In the transmission spectrum T(λ), the band-edge characteristic used for the temperature determination is thus essentially apparent as a transition region between the spectral components A′.sub.1 and A′.sub.2, the background radiation C′ being superimposed on the spectrum.
[0067]
[0068] For both embodiments, in the band-edge method, the spectral position of the band-edge λ.sub.BE is first determined from the transmission spectrum T(λ). The temperature ϑ of the sample 10 is subsequently determined therefrom by means of a known dependency ϑ(λ.sub.BE). A significant drawback of the prior art is, however, that, due to the layer stack 12, surface effects are superimposed on the transmission spectrum T(λ), which make it difficult to accurately determine the spectral position of the band-edge λ.sub.BE. These contributions from the growing layers are usually ignored in the prior art and result in temperature errors.
[0069]
[0070]
[0071]
[0072]
[0073] from the reflection spectrum R(λ), wherein the divisor contains the reflection spectrum R.sub.0(λ) of the sample before the deposition.
[0074]
[0075] A comparison S41 of the difference |ϑ.sub.i+1−ϑ.sub.i| with a specified threshold value is also carried out for the iteration. If the difference is greater than the threshold value, another adaptation S31 of the model is carried out for the already applied layer stack 12, the current value for the temperature ϑ.sub.i+1 being used as a new temperature parameter for the model. In another iteration step, the corresponding steps are then cycled through again, but another determination S1 of the transmission spectrum T(λ) does not take place within the iteration loop. This determination is transferred from the preceding cycle unchanged for the calculation S3 of an iteratively improved, surface-corrected transmission spectrum T′(λ). If, during the comparison S41 of the difference |ε.sub.i+1−ϑ.sub.i|, the difference is ultimately less than the threshold value, an output S42 of the temperature ϑ.sub.i+1 is made as the final result of the temperature measurement.
[0076]
LIST OF REFERENCE SIGNS
[0077] 10 Sample [0078] 12 Layer stack [0079] 14 Front side [0080] 16 Backside [0081] 20 First radiation source [0082] 22 Second radiation source [0083] 30 Spectrometer [0084] S1 Determination of a transmission spectrum T(λ) [0085] S2 Determination of a reflection spectrum R(λ) [0086] S30 Determination of a starting value ϑ.sub.0 [0087] S31 Adaptation of the model for the already applied layer stack [0088] S32 Calculation of a correction function K(λ) [0089] S3 Calculation of a surface-corrected transmission spectrum T′(λ) [0090] S4 Determination of the temperature ϑ and ϑ.sub.i (with iterative calculation) [0091] S41 Comparison of the difference |ϑ.sub.i+1−ϑ.sub.i| with a specified threshold value [0092] S42 Output of the temperature ϑ [0093] A, A′ First optical radiation [0094] B, B′ Second optical radiation [0095] d Sample thickness [0096] BE Band-edge [0097] ϑ Temperature of the sample [0098] ϑ.sub.P Process temperature