A SOLID DOSAGE FORM COMPRISING ZINC GLUCONATE AND INOSINE PRANOBEX, A METHOD FOR ITS PREPARATION AND ITS APPLICATIONS

Abstract

The subject of the invention is a solid dosage form containing zinc gluconate and inosine pranobex and adjuvants characterized in that zinc gluconate is in an amount of 3.11% to 4.51% by mass of the dosage form, inosine pranobex is in an amount of 71.43% by mass of the dosage form, sodium carboxymethyl starch (type A) is in the range from 5% to 14% by weight of the dosage form and sodium lauryl sulfate at a level from 0.7% to 1% by weight of the dosage form and the mannitol content is from 6% to 10.7% by weight of the dosage form, and method of its preparation and its applications.

Claims

1-7. (canceled)

8. A solid dosage form containing zinc gluconate and inosine pranobex and adjuvants, characterized in that zinc gluconate is in an amount of 3.11% to 4.51% by mass, inosine pranobex is in amount of 71.43% by mass, sodium carboxymethyl starch (type A) is in the range from 5% to 14% by weight of the dosage form and sodium lauryl sulfate is at a level from 0.7% to 1% by weight of the dosage form and the mannitol content is from 6% to 10.7% by weight of the dosage form.

9. The solid dosage form according to claim 8, characterized in that it contains magnesium stearate in an amount of 1%, povidone in an amount of 3.43%, and starch in an amount of 3.6%.

10. A method of obtaining the solid dosage form of claim 8 comprising a) forming a gruel for the wet granulation process in an amount of 6.06% by weight of the dosage form based on water, povidone 30 and sodium lauryl sulfate at povidone temperature from 30° C. to 60° C., lauryl sulfate temperature from 30° C. to 35° C., for 3.5 hours, b) pre-mixing of inosine pranobex with zinc gluconate, wheat starch and sodium carboxymethyl starch (type A) at a temperature of 20° C. to 30° C. and with granulator rotating at 100 to 300 rpm, c) spraying the gruel based binder from step a) in the amount determined by the following parameters: pump rotation from 125 rpm to 250 rpm and addition of the binder to the substances from step b) for 2.10 min to 4.40 min, to make granulate, d) drying the granulate from step c) by means of a fluid bed dryer at from 40° C. to 50° C., e) mixing the granulate from step d) with mannitol in dry form sieved through a 1.5 mm to 2.5 mm mesh, f) mixing the granulate from step e) with a lubricant sieved through a 1.5 mm to 2.5 mm mesh, and g) tableting at 10-50 kN pressure forces.

11. A method modulating the immune response and antiviral activity comprising administering the solid dosage form of claim 8 to a human.

12. The method according to claim 11, characterized in that the dosage form is administered to a human in amounts that ensure the intake of 500 mg to 1000 mg of inosine pranobex in one solid dosage form, and 21.78 mg to 63.16 mg of zinc gluconate in one solid dosage form.

13. The method according to claim 11, characterized in that the dose is approximately 50 mg per kg of body weight per day of inosine pranobex administered with 1 tablet containing 1000 mg inosine pranobex and 6.25 mg zinc ions or 2 tablets containing 500 mg inosine pranobex and 3.125 mg zinc ions 3 to 4 times per day in the adult population and a half tablet containing 1000 mg inosine pranobex and 6.25 mg zinc ions or 1 or a half of tablet containing 500 mg inosine pranobex and 3.125 mg zinc ions, 3 to 4 times per day in the population pediatric.

Description

[0007] Example 1. Method for obtaining a solid oral drug formulation containing a combination of inosine pranobex and zinc gluconate.

[0008] The subject of the invention is a product containing a combination of inosine pranobex and zinc gluconate, characterized by a consistent release profile in relation to monoproducts containing inosine pranobex and final release of zinc ions at the appropriate level, i.e. min 80% within 45 min. The pharmaceutical composition of the medicinal product in solid oral dosage form is presented in Table 1:

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Composition of Inosine pranobex + Zinc gluconate, 1000 mg + 43.56 mg tablet. Amount Lp. Starting materials Functions Amount [mg/tablet] [%/tablet] 1. Inosine pranobex Active substance 1000.00 500.00 71.43 2. Zinc gluconate Active substance 43.56 21.78 3.11 3. Wheat starch Filling agent 50.44 25.22 3.6 4. Povidone 30 Binding agent 48.00 24.00 3.43 5. Sodium carboxymethyl Disintegrating agent 98.00 49.00 7.00 starch (Type A) 6. Sodium lauryl sulfate Excipient that increases the rate 14.00 7.00 1.00 of API dissolution 7. Mannitol Filling agent 132.00 66.00 9.43 8. Magnesium stearate Gliding agent 14.00 7.00 1.00

[0009] The method of preparing a solid oral pharmaceutical composition containing a combination of two active ingredients of inosine pranobex and zinc gluconate is as follows. The preparation process begins with weighing the listed starting materials included in the tested product, according to Table 1. The present invention is prepared based on the wet granulation process, where the granulation solution is an aqueous solution of Povidone 30 and sodium lauryl sulfate (“gruel”). Some raw materials (inosine pranobex; zinc gluconate; wheat starch; sodium carboxymethyl starch (Type A)) are added into the granulator bowl and subjected to preliminary mixing. In the next wet granulation step, the starting materials are sprayed with a binder solution composed of: povidone 30, sodium lauryl sulfate and purified water. The end of this step is the production of granulate. The obtained granulate is dried in a fluid bed dryer. After unloading the drying chamber, the finished granulate is transferred to a mixing container. Mannitol in dry form is added by sieving into the container with granules. The next production step is the mixing step. Magnesium stearate is added to the container with the aforementioned mixture and the whole mixture is mixed again. The tableting mix prepared in this way is tableted using a rotary tablet press. The manufacturing process completes the blister stage of loose product in a direct blister pack, followed by unit packaging in cardboard boxes.

[0010] Example 2. Dissolution testing of a solid oral drug formulation containing a combination of inosine pranobex and zinc gluconate vs monopreparation with inosine pranobex.

[0011] The initial composition of the product was developed based on the compositions of market products containing inosine pranobox. At the beginning of developmental studies, the consistency of the release profile of the active substance pranobex inosine in Inosine pranobex+Zinc gluconate, 1000 mg+6.25 mg and tablets with the reference product was examined. The results of the release profiles of the active substance inosine pranobex are presented in Table 2.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Release profiles of inosine pranobex from test comprising inosine pranobex relative to a reference product. Starting materials Composition of technological tests [mg/tablet] Inosine pranobex Reference drug Tested drug Zinc gluconate (1000 mg Inosine (Inosine pranobex + Wheat starch pranobex, tablets) Zinc gluconate, Povidone 30 1000 mg + 6.25 mg, tablet) Mannitol Magnesium stearate Release profiles of inosine pranobex in phosphate buffer pH = 6.8 [%] Time [min]:  5.0 min 19.9 12.6 10.0 min 39.8 20.6 15.0 min 57.9 26.8 20.0 min 71.6 31.9 30.0 min 90.6 42.5 Similarity factor (similarity limit - minimum 50) Time [min]: 30.0 min  24.40

[0012] In the technological test of Inosine pranobex+Zinc gluconate product, 1000 mg+6.25 mg tablet, based on the composition of excipients of the reference product, tablets were obtained which were characterized by a lack of consistency of the inosine pranobex release profile with the active substance release profile of the reference product. Release of API from the tested product is too slow, similarity coefficient is below the similarity limit of minimum 50, which prevents the use of this form of the drug as a therapeutically effective market solution.

[0013] Example 3. Development of a solid oral drug formulation containing a combination of inosine pranobex and zinc gluconate, and substances that accelerate the release of active substances from the solid drug form.

[0014] Since it was surprisingly found that the addition of a small amount, relative to the weight of the whole tablet, of zinc gluconate to the inosine pranobex product reduced the pharmaceutical availability of the second active substance, the next stage of the development of the medicinal product was to develop a formulation using excipients with disintegrating properties, i.e. sodium carboxymethyl starch type A, croscarmellose sodium, Kollidon CL, sodium hydrogen phosphate and/or increasing the dissolution rate of API, such as: sodium lauryl sulfate, Tween 80, Brij 58, Poloxamer 188 and PEG 40.

[0015] Example 3a. Use of disintegrating agents (sodium carboxymethyl starch (type A)).

[0016] In order to select the amount of the disintegrating agent sodium carboxymethyl starch (type A), technological tests were carried out using a different percentage of this substance in the quantitative composition of the product tested. The composition of tests and the results of the release profiles of the active substance pranobex inosine are shown in Table 3 and FIG. 1, where the results of testing the inosine pranobex release profiles in tests with different percentages of sodium carboxymethyl starch (type A) used, in phosphate buffer pH=6.8, are shown.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Results of testing of inosine pranobex release profiles in tests with different percentages of sodium carboxymethyl starch (type A). Composition of technological tests [mg/tablet] Sodium carboxymethyl starch (type A) content Starting materials 2% 5% 7% Inosine pranobex Reference 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 Zinc gluconate product 43.56 43.56 43.56 Wheat starch 134.44 92.44 64.44 Povidone 30 48.00 48.00 48.00 Sodium carboxymethyl 28.00 70.00 98.00 starch (type A) Mannitol 132.00 132.00 132.00 Magnesium stearate 14.00 14.00 14.00 Release profiles of active substance inosine pranobex in phosphate buffer pH = 6.8 [%]:   5.0 min 19.9 9.8 9.0 9.2 .10.0 min 39.8 16.4 16.9 14.6  15.0 min 57.9 21.4 22.6 20.7  20.0 min 71.6 23.6 28.3 27.0  30.0 min 90.6 34.0 37.5 38.4 Similarity factor 20.61 22.00 21.58 (similarity limit - minimum 50)

[0017] The above results of studies on the release profile of inosine pranobex in a medicinal product containing a combination of two active ingredients: inosine pranobex (1000 mg) and zinc ions (6.25 mg) in the form of zinc gluconate, in the form of a tablet, showed inconsistency of the release profile of the active substance inosine pranobex with reference product.

[0018] It was concluded that the use of only sodium carboxymethyl starch (type A) as a disintegrating agent in the final product Inosine pranobex+Zinc gluconate, 1000 mg+6.25 mg tablet, does not match the release profile of the active substance inosine pranobex, which is a critical parameter proving the therapeutic effectiveness of the studied drug. Surprisingly, it turned out that in this case the active substance inosine pranobex releases more slowly compared to its release from the reference product as well as from the tested product which did not contain sodium starch glycolate (type A).

[0019] Example 3b. Use of a substance that increases the dissolution rate of the active substances (sodium lauryl sulfate).

[0020] In order to select the amount of sodium lauryl sulfate, the substance increasing the dissolution rate of the active substances, technological tests were carried out using different percentages of this substance in the quantitative composition of the tested product. The composition of the tests and the results of the release profiles of the active substance pranobex inosine are shown in Table 4 and FIG. 2, showing the results of testing the inosine pranobex release profiles in tests with different percentages of sodium lauryl sulfate in phosphate buffer pH=6.8.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Results of testing inosine pranobex release profiles in tests with different percentages of sodium lauryl sulfate used. Composition of technological tests [mg/tablet] Sodium lauryl sulfate content Starting materials 0.5% 0.7% 1.0% Inosine pranobex Reference 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 Zinc gluconate product 43.56 43.56 43.56 Wheat starch 155.44 152.64 148.44 Povidone 30 48.00 48.00 48.00 Sodium lauryl sulfate 7.00 9.80 14.00 Mannitol 132.00 132.00 132.00 Magnesium stearate 14.00 14.00 14.00 Release profiles of active substance inosine pranobex in phosphate buffer pH = 6.8 [%]:  5.0 min 19.9 11.6 26.3 26.2 10.0 min 39.8 54.6 54.1 60.9 15.0 min 57.9 69.3 75.8 82.1 20.0 min 71.6 80.2 91.9 91.9 30.0 min 90.6 97.1 100.0 93.5 Similarity factor 49.18 41.73 38.10 (similarity limit - minimum 50)

[0021] The above results of studies on the release profile of inosine pranobex in a medicinal product containing a combination of two active substances: inosine pranobex (1000 mg) and zinc ions (6.25 mg) in the form of zinc gluconate, in solid form of the drug, showed inconsistency of the release profile of the active substance pranobex inosine with a reference product.

[0022] The use of only sodium lauryl sulfate in the final product does not match the release profile of the active substance inosine pranobex. In the conducted tests, the active substance inosine pranobex releases faster compared to its release in the reference product.

[0023] Example 3c. Determination of the appropriate ratio of disintegrants and excipients increasing the dissolution rate of API (sodium carboxymethyl starch (type A) and sodium lauryl sulfate) in the formulation of the test product.

[0024] Considering previously obtained results, further developmental studies of a medicinal product containing a combination of two active substances: inosine pranobex (1000 mg) and zinc ions (6.25 mg) in the form of zinc gluconate, in the form of a tablet was conducted towards the development of the product formulation, choosing the appropriate ratio of disintegrating agents and increasing the rate of API dissolution. The following are formulation tests performed by selecting the sodium starch glycolate (type A) excipient concentrations from 2.5% to 14% and the following sodium lauryl sulfate excipient concentrations: 0.5% to 1.5%. The results obtained are summarized in Tables 5a and 5b and in FIGS. 3a and 3b where FIG. 3a depicts the release profiles of inosine pranobex in tests using different quantitative ratios of a disintegrating agent (sodium carboxymethyl starch) in phosphate buffer pH=4.5 and FIG. 3b shows release profiles of inosine pranobex in tests using different quantitative ratios of the excipient increasing the dissolution rate of active substances (sodium lauryl sulfate) in phosphate buffer pH=4.5.

[0025] As a result of the conducted tests, it was found that the consistency of the release profile of the active substance pranobex inosine from a medicinal product containing a combination of two active substances: inosine pranobex (1000 mg) and zinc ions (6.25 mg) in the form of zinc gluconate, with the release profile of API from the reference product, was obtained for product composition with a percentage of sodium carboxymethyl starch (type A) in the range of 5-14% and sodium lauryl sulfate at a level of 0.7 to 1%. Despite the positive test results for the formulation with 14% of sodium starch glycolate, further increase of its level in the product is unreasonable, because this value already at this level exceeds the recommended amount according to the literature data of the excipient, while maintaining its disintegrating function in the solid form of the drug.

[0026] For the above technological tests, the final release of zinc ions was determined. An acceptable level of zinc ion release at a level exceeding 80% of its value in the formulation during 45 min was observed for all tests with the levels of substances accelerating the release: sodium starch glycolate (type A) in the range from 5% to 14% and from 0.7% to 1% of sodium lauryl sulfate. Due to the fact that for this level the assumed consistency of the inosine pranobex release profiles and the appropriate level of zinc ion release have been surprisingly found, the determined range of release modifying substances is considered appropriate. Surprisingly, it turned out that the final release of the second active substance used (zinc ions in the form of zinc gluconate) in the developed formulation of the medicinal product Inosine pranobex+Zinc gluconate, 1000 mg+6.25 mg tablet, meets the tightened criteria of 80% release in 20 minutes only for one of the formulations tested, which contains 7% sodium carboxymethyl starch (type A) in combination with 1% sodium lauryl sulfate, according to the essence of the invention.

[0027] Example 4. Determination an appropriate amount of filling agent (annitol).

[0028] In order to select the correct amount of filling agent: mannitol, technological tests were carried out using different percentage concentration of this substance in the quantitative composition of the invention. The composition of the tests together with the results obtained are presented in the following Table 6 and FIG. 4, which illustrate the release profiles of inosine pranobex from Inosine pranobex+Zinc gluconate 1000 mg+6.25 mg tablets, tablets for tests with different percentages of mannitol, in phosphate buffer pH=4.5.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 6 Release profiles of inosine pranobex from Inosine pranobex + Zinc gluconate, 1000 mg + 6.25 mg tablet in tests with different percentages of mannitol. Composition of technological tests [mg/tablet] Mannitol level per tablet Starting materials 6% 9.43% 10,7% Inosine pranobex Reference 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 Zinc gluconate product 43.56 43.56 43.56 Wheat starch 98.44 50.44 32.44 Povidone 30 48.00 48.00 48.00 Sodium carboxymethyl 98.00 98.00 98.00 starch (type A) Sodium lauryl sulfate 14.00 14.00 14.00 Mannitol 84.00 132.00 150.00 Magnesium stearate 14.00 14.00 14.00 Release profiles of active substance inosine pranobex in phosphate buffer pH = 4.5 [%]:  5.0 min 18.0 25.7 22.4 18.5 10.0 min 38.4 52.7 44.6 41.5 15.0 min 57.7 70.2 62.5 59.5 20.0 min 73.3 82.2 75.6 68.3 30.0 min 92.3 94.2 89.6 81.8 Consistency of inosine pranobex release profiles with the reference product (factor f2 minimum 50.0): Factor f2 49.8 67.6 62.8 (30 min) Consistency with reference product YES YES YES (30 min)* Final release of zinc ions in phosphate buffer pH = 4.5 [%]: 20 min 73.8 82.3 65.3 45 min 82.5 87.3 81.6

[0029] The content of mannitol as a filling excipient at the level of 6% determines the product whose release profile of inosine pranobex was at the acceptability limits, and the amount of zinc ions released meets the assumptions of at least 80% within 45 min. Therefore, the amount of mannitol for the first test is considered to be the limit amount below which the release profile will not meet the assumptions made. The use of the examined excipient at the level of 9.43% and 10.7% determines the preparation of tablets whose release profiles of inosine pranobex relative to the reference product are at an acceptable level (similarity factor f2 above 50 compared to the reference product) and the amount of zinc ions released meets the assumptions (at least 80% during 45 min). Surprisingly, it turned out that only at a level of mannitol consistent with the disclosed composition, the level of zinc ion release exceeds 80% already in 20 min.

[0030] Taking into account the release profile of inosine pranobex as well as the final release of zinc ions, it was found that the content of the filling agent mannitol at a level from 6% to 10.7% of the tableting mixture determines the preparation of tablets that meet all assumed quality requirements for the medicinal product.

[0031] Example 5. Selection of the amount of active substance: zinc gluconate.

[0032] The next stage of developmental research involved determining the amount of zinc gluconate (source of zinc ions) to be used in Inosine pranobex+Zinc gluconate, 1000 mg+6.25 mg tablet. It was assumed that zinc ions must be released from the tested drug form in an amount of at least 80% of their initial content in the product within 45 minutes. However, the release profile of the other active substance inosine pranobex must be consistent with the market reference product. Technological tests were carried out in accordance with the recipe described in Example 1, however, the composition was modified using different contents of zinc gluconate (from 80% to 200% of its initial amount in the tested product). The results obtained for the performed tests of release of active substances Inosine pranobex+Zinc gluconate, 1000 mg+6.25 mg tablet, are presented in Table 7 and FIG. 5, which shows the release profiles of inosine pranobex from Inosine pranobex+Zinc gluconate 1000 mg+6.25 mg tablets, in tests using different percentages of zinc gluconate in phosphate buffer pH=4.5.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 7 Results of testing of inosine pranobex release profiles and final zinc gluconate release in tests using different percentages of zinc gluconate. Composition of technological tests [mg/tablet] Zinc gluconate Starting materials 80% 100% 145% 200% Inosine pranobex Reference 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 Zinc gluconate product 34.85 43.56 63.16 87.12 Wheat starch 59.15 50.44 30.84 6.88 Povidone 30 48.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 Sodium carboxymethyl 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 starch (type A) Sodium lauryl sulfate 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 Mannitol 132.00 132.00 132.00 132.00 Magnesium stearate 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 Release profile of active substance inosine pranobex in phosphate buffer pH = 4.5 [%]:  5.0 min. 18.0 26.0 22.4 22.7 15.0 10.0 min. 38.4 52.1 44.6 47.6 32.4 15.0 min. 57.7 72.4 62.5 66.6 46.3 20.0 min. 73.3 85.4 75.6 79.1 57.9 30.0 min. 92.3 98.8 89.6 92.9 74.9 Consistency of inosine pranobex release profiles with the reference product (factor f2 minimum 50): Factor f2 (30 min) 47.0 67.6 58.7 46.0 Consistency with reference product NO YES YES NO (30 min) Final release of zinc ions in relation to the amount set in phosphate buffer pH = 4.5 [%]: 20 min 78.6 82.3 68.4 52.6 45 min 95.0 87.3 82.4 84.2

[0033] As a result of the conducted research, it was found that the consistency of the release profile of the active substance pranobex inosine from a medicinal product containing a combination of two active substances: inosine pranobex (1000 mg) and zinc ions (6.25 mg) in the form of zinc gluconate in the form of a tablet, with the release profile of API from comparative product, was obtained for product compositions with a percentage of zinc gluconate in the range from 100% to 145%. The final release of zinc ions for the above zinc gluconate range met the acceptability criteria. Based on the tests carried out, it was surprisingly found that only for the composition disclosed in example 1, the final amount of zinc ion release exceeded 80% in just 20 minutes. The range of zinc gluconate content determined during the tests in the present invention was determined to be in the range from 100% to 145% in relation to the composition presented in Example 1.

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 5a Results of testing of inosine pranobex release profiles and zinc gluconate final release from samples with different percentages of sodium carboxymethyl starch (type A) used Composition of technological tests [mg/tablet] Sodium karboxymethyl starch (typ A) levels Starting materials 2.5% 4% 5% 6.5% 7% 7.5% 8.5% 10% 11.5% 14% Inosine pranobex Reference 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 Zinc gluconate product 43.56 43.56 43.56 43.56 43.56 43.56 43.56 43.56 43.56 43.56 Wheat starch 113.44 92.44 78.44 57.44 50.44 43.44 29.44 8.44 30.00 30.00 Povidone 30 48.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 Sodium carboxymethyl 35.00 56.00 70.00 91.00 98.00 105.00 119.00 140.00 161.00 196.00 starch (type A) Sodium lauryl sulfate 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 Mannitol 132.00 132.00 132.00 132.00 132.00 132.00 132.00 132.00 89.44 54.44 Magnesium stearate 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 Release profile of active substance inosine pranobex in phosphate buffer pH = 4.5 [%]:  5.0 min 18.0 28.7 27.5 21.0 25.8 22.4 23.2 24.8 19.7 22.3 20.2 10.0 min 38.4 57.9 56.1 41.7 51.3 44.6 48.1 49.3 39.5 46.4 40.4 15.0 min 57.7 78.9 76.6 58.2 70.2 62.5 66.9 67.5 54.8 64.8 54.6 20.0 min 73.3 90.9 88.2 70.5 82.1 75.6 79.7 79.0 67.2 76.2 64.9 30.0 min 92.3 100.4 99.7 84.9 97.1 89.6 92.1 89.8 83.0 90.4 79.5 Consistency of inosine pranobex release profiles with the reference product (factor f2 minimum 50): Factor f2 (30 minut) 39.4 42.0 68.9 50.2 67.6 57.4 55.4 63.7 63.1 57.2 Consistency with reference product NO NO YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES (30 minutes) Final release of zinc ions in phosphate buffer pH = 4.5 [%]:   20 min 78.5 77.6 59.8 64.5 82.3 65.6 68.5 59.3 62.5 65.1   45 min 86.8 85.7 84.0 83.5 87.3 81.9 83.4 82.9 81.8 84.5 * - Acceptance criterion adopted by us: similarity factor with reference product f2 ≥ 50.0 According to the guideline: similarity factor with reference product f2 ≥ 50

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 5b Results of testing of inosine pranobex release profiles and zinc gluconate final release from samples with different percentages of sodium lauryl sulfate Composition of technological tests [mg/tablet] Sodium lauryl sulfate levels Starting materials 0.5% 0.7% 0.9% 1% 1.1% 1.25% 1.5% Inosine pranobex Reference 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 Zinc gluconate product 43.56 43.56 43.56 43.56 43.56 43.56 43.56 Wheat starch 57.44 54.64 51.84 50.44 49.04 46.94 43.44 Povidone 30 48.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 Sodium carboxymethyl 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 starch (type A) Sodium lauryl sulfate 7.00 9.80 12.60 14.00 15.40 17.50 21.00 Mannitol 132.00 132.00 132.00 132.00 132.00 132.00 132.00 Magnesium stearate 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 Release profile of active substance inosine pranobex in phosphate buffer pH = 4.5 [%]:  5.0 min 18.0 9.7 19.2 25.1 22.4 27.6 27.7 25.8 10.0 min 38.4 18.5 38.9 48.8 44.6 54.7 55.4 51.4 15.0 min 57.7 26.9 54.4 67.2 62.5 73.8 75.0 71.5 20.0 min 73.3 36.2 66.4 78.9 75.6 85.2 86.0 84.3 30.0 min 92.3 50.5 81.5 92.2 89.6 95.7 94.3 94.9 Consistency of inosine pranobex release profiles with the reference product (factor f2 minimum 50): Factor f2 (30 minutes) 26.0 61.0 56.1 67.6 45.2 44.2 48.9 Consistency with reference product NO YES YES YES NO NO NO (30 minutes) Final release of zinc ions in phosphate buffer pH = 4.5 [%]:   20 min 51.0 57.3 64.4 82.3 72.2 74.1 75.8   45 min n.d. 82.7 84.1 87.3 82.2 n.d. 85.8 * - Acceptance criterion adopted by us: similarity factor with reference product f2 ≥ 50.0 According to the guideline: similarity factor with reference product f2 ≥ 50

[0034] Example 6. Use of a solid dosage form containing zinc gluconate and inosine proanobex.

[0035] Inosine pranobex and zinc ions modulate similar immune response processes. Both zinc and inosine pranobex affect the activity of NK cells, macrophages and neutrophils. They also modulate the process of phagocytosis and affect the chemotaxis of cells of the immune system. In addition, zinc regulates the adhesion of neutrophils to vascular endothelial cells. Both substances regulate the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. Inosine pranobex and zinc modulate the activity and processes of multiplication and differentiation of T lymphocytes. Zinc deficiency leads to a disturbance in the quantity and quantitative ratio of individual types of T lymphocytes. Zinc ions regulate TNFα secretion, whereas inosine pranobex positively affects INFγ secretion. Furthermore, inosine pranobex and zinc regulate the cytotoxicity of T lymphocytes. In addition, inosine pranobex increases the level of IgG immunoglobulin, and zinc is necessary for the reaction of the receptor on the NK surface with the MHC-1 complex on target cells. The decrease in zinc content in the course of infection can be caused by the use of its resources in the body, both by the cells of its own immune system, and by a pathogen using it for its own metabolic needs. Insufficient zinc content in the immune system can disrupt the aforementioned processes associated with the immune response. The immune system is particularly sensitive to fluctuations in zinc levels. Its cells react to a decrease in the level of zinc faster than it is seen in the concentration of this element in plasma. Therefore, a deficiency of this element may lead to an increase in the duration of the disease and hinder treatment, including antiviral therapy.

[0036] The effect of inosine pranobex, in the event of zinc deficiency, may be reduced. Adequate zinc concentration determines the correct immune response, while inosine pranobex may additionally strengthen it. It is therefore justified to supplement antiviral and immunomodulating therapy with this compound, a highly bioavailable zinc salt, which is gluconate.

[0037] The described pharmaceutical composition is administered to a human in amounts that ensure the intake of 500 mg to 1000 mg of inosine pranobex in one solid drug form and from 21.78 mg to 63.16 mg of zinc gluconate in one solid drug form.

[0038] The solid dosage form containing zinc gluconate and inosine pranobex is used in modulating the immune response and antiviral activity at the recommended dose of 50 mg per kg of body weight per day of inosine pranobex dosed with 1 tablet containing 1000 mg of inosine pranobex and 6.25 mg of zinc ions or tablets containing 500 mg inosine pranobex and 3.125 mg zinc ions, 3 to 4 times a day in the adult population and half a tablet containing 1000 mg inosine pranobex and 6.25 mg zinc ions, or one or half of tablet containing 500 mg inosine pranobex and 3.125 mg of zinc ions 3 to 4 times a day in the pediatric population.