Abstract
The present invention makes it possible to simply, rapidly, and with high sensitivity detect periodontopathic bacteria at room temperature and in under ten minutes (approximately 2-8 minutes). The arginine-specific peptidase activity of three strains of periodontopathic bacteria, i.e., Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia, are analyzed at room temperature, in under ten minutes, and with high sensitivity. A first compound that has an anti-oxidizing effect and/or a second compound that protects SH groups (mercapto groups) and has a disulfide bond-cleaving effect are present during analysis of a sample. The first compound is at least one among L-ascorbic acid, L-cysteine hydrochloride, and glutathione, and the second compound is at least one among DTT, thioglycolic acid, thioglycerol, mercaptoethanol, and TCEP.
Claims
1. A method for detecting periodontopathic bacteria in which periodontopathic bacteria are detected in a sample at room temperature and in less than 10 minutes, whereby: a first compound having an antioxidant effect and/or a second compound having action of protecting SH groups and cleaving disulfide bonds, is contacted with the sample together with N-α-benzoyl-DL-arginine-2-naphthylamide hydrochloride at room temperature and the mixture is allowed to stand at room temperature for less than 10 minutes, to allow detection of periodontopathic bacteria in subsequent coloration analysis with a coloring reagent, wherein: the first compound is at least one selected from among L-ascorbic acid, L-cysteine hydrochloride, and glutathione, and the second compound is at least one selected from among DTT, thioglycolic acid, thioglycerol, mercaptoethanol, and TCEP.
2. A method for detecting periodontopathic bacteria in which periodontopathic bacteria are detected in a sample at room temperature and in less than 10 minutes, whereby: a sample containing a first compound having an antioxidant effect and/or a second compound having action of protecting SH groups and cleaving disulfide bonds, is added to N-α-benzoyl-DL-arginine-2-naphthylamide hydrochloride and the mixture is allowed to stand at room temperature for less than 10 minutes, to allow detection of periodontopathic bacteria in subsequent coloration analysis with a coloring reagent, wherein: the first compound is at least one selected from among L-ascorbic acid, L-cysteine hydrochloride, and glutathione, and the second compound is at least one selected from among DTT, thioglycolic acid, thioglycerol, mercaptoethanol, and TCEP.
3. A method for detecting periodontopathic bacteria in which periodontopathic bacteria are detected in a sample at room temperature and in less than 10 minutes, whereby: a first compound having an antioxidant effect and a second compound having action of protecting SH groups and cleaving disulfide bonds are mixed and added to a water absorbent material together with N-α-benzoyl-DL-arginine-2-naphthylamide hydrochloride and the sample is contacted with the water absorbent material, and then allowed to stand at room temperature for less than 10 minutes, to allow detection of periodontopathic bacteria in subsequent coloration analysis with a coloring reagent, wherein: the first compound is at least one selected from among L-ascorbic acid, L-cysteine hydrochloride, and glutathione, and the second compound is at least one selected from among DTT, thioglycolic acid, thioglycerol, mercaptoethanol, and TCEP.
4. A method for detecting periodontopathic bacteria in which periodontopathic bacteria are detected in a sample at room temperature and in less than 10 minutes, whereby: after a first compound having an antioxidant effect and a second compound having action of protecting SH groups and cleaving disulfide bonds are mixed, the mixture is added to the sample, and then N-α-benzoyl-DL-arginine-2-naphthylamide hydrochloride is added to the sample and the mixture is allowed to stand at room temperature for less than 10 minutes, to allow detection of periodontopathic bacteria in subsequent coloration analysis with a coloring reagent, wherein: the first compound is at least one selected from among L-ascorbic acid, L-cysteine hydrochloride, and glutathione, and the second compound is at least one selected from among DTT, thioglycolic acid, thioglycerol, mercaptoethanol, and TCEP.
5. The method for detecting periodontopathic bacteria according to claim 1, wherein the concentration of the first compound is 6.25 mM to 100 mM.
6. The method for detecting periodontopathic bacteria according to claim 1, wherein the concentration of the second compound (excluding TCEP) is 6.25 mM to 100 mM.
7. The method for detecting periodontopathic bacteria according to claim 1, wherein the concentration of the TCEP is 6.25 mM to 25 mM.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0037] FIG. 1 is a graph showing detection sensitivities in the absence of a first compound and second compound (Comparative Example 1), under the same conditions as the analysis method for periodontopathic bacteria according to Example 1 and Example 3 of the invention.
[0038] FIG. 2 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 6.25 mM L-ascorbic acid (Example 1).
[0039] FIG. 3 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 12.5 mM L-ascorbic acid (Example 1).
[0040] FIG. 4 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 25 mM L-ascorbic acid (Example 1).
[0041] FIG. 5 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 50 mM L-ascorbic acid (Example 1).
[0042] FIG. 6 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 100 mM L-ascorbic acid (Example 1).
[0043] FIG. 7 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 6.25 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride (Example 1).
[0044] FIG. 8 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 12.5 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride (Example 1).
[0045] FIG. 9 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 25 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride (Example 1).
[0046] FIG. 10 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 50 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride (Example 1).
[0047] FIG. 11 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 100 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride (Example 1).
[0048] FIG. 12 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 6.25 mM glutathione (Example 1).
[0049] FIG. 13 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 12.5 mM glutathione (Example 1).
[0050] FIG. 14 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 25 mM glutathione (Example 1).
[0051] FIG. 15 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 50 mM glutathione (Example 1).
[0052] FIG. 16 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 100 mM glutathione (Example 1).
[0053] FIG. 17 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 6.25 mM DTT (dithiothreitol) (Example 1).
[0054] FIG. 18 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 12.5 mM DTT (Example 1).
[0055] FIG. 19 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 25 mM DTT (Example 1).
[0056] FIG. 20 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 50 mM DTT (Example 1).
[0057] FIG. 21 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 100 mM DTT (Example 1).
[0058] FIG. 22 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 6.25 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 1).
[0059] FIG. 23 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 12.5 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 1).
[0060] FIG. 24 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 25 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 1).
[0061] FIG. 25 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 50 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 1).
[0062] FIG. 26 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 100 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 1).
[0063] FIG. 27 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 6.25 mM thioglycerol (Example 1).
[0064] FIG. 28 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 12.5 mM thioglycerol (Example 1).
[0065] FIG. 29 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 25 mM thioglycerol (Example 1).
[0066] FIG. 30 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 50 mM thioglycerol (Example 1).
[0067] FIG. 31 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 100 mM thioglycerol (Example 1).
[0068] FIG. 32 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 6.25 mM mercaptoethanol (Example 1).
[0069] FIG. 33 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 12.5 mM mercaptoethanol (Example 1).
[0070] FIG. 34 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 25 mM mercaptoethanol (Example 1).
[0071] FIG. 35 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 50 mM mercaptoethanol (Example 1).
[0072] FIG. 36 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 100 mM mercaptoethanol (Example 1).
[0073] FIG. 37 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 6.25 mM TCEP (tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride) (Example 1).
[0074] FIG. 38 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 12.5 mM TCEP (Example 1).
[0075] FIG. 39 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 25 mM TCEP (Example 1).
[0076] FIG. 40 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 50 mM TCEP (Example 1).
[0077] FIG. 41 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 100 mM TCEP (Example 1).
[0078] FIG. 42 is a graph showing detection sensitivities in the absence of the first compound and second compound (Comparative Example 2), under the same conditions as the analysis method for periodontopathic bacteria according to Example 2 and Example 4 of the invention.
[0079] FIG. 43 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 6.25 mM L-ascorbic acid (Example 2).
[0080] FIG. 44 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 12.5 mM L-ascorbic acid (Example 2).
[0081] FIG. 45 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 25 mM L-ascorbic acid (Example 2).
[0082] FIG. 46 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 50 mM L-ascorbic acid (Example 2).
[0083] FIG. 47 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 100 mM L-ascorbic acid (Example 2).
[0084] FIG. 48 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 6.25 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride (Example 2).
[0085] FIG. 49 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 12.5 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride (Example 2).
[0086] FIG. 50 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 25 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride (Example 2).
[0087] FIG. 51 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 50 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride (Example 2).
[0088] FIG. 52 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 100 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride (Example 2).
[0089] FIG. 53 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 6.25 mM glutathione (Example 2).
[0090] FIG. 54 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 12.5 mM glutathione (Example 2).
[0091] FIG. 55 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 25 mM glutathione (Example 2).
[0092] FIG. 56 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 50 mM glutathione (Example 2).
[0093] FIG. 57 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 100 mM glutathione (Example 2).
[0094] FIG. 58 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 6.25 mM DTT (Example 2).
[0095] FIG. 59 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 12.5 mM DTT (Example 2).
[0096] FIG. 60 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 25 mM DTT (Example 2).
[0097] FIG. 61 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 50 mM DTT (Example 2).
[0098] FIG. 62 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 100 mM DTT (Example 2).
[0099] FIG. 63 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 6.25 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 2).
[0100] FIG. 64 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 12.5 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 2).
[0101] FIG. 65 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 25 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 2).
[0102] FIG. 66 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 50 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 2).
[0103] FIG. 67 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 100 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 2).
[0104] FIG. 68 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 6.25 mM thioglycerol (Example 2).
[0105] FIG. 69 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 12.5 mM thioglycerol (Example 2).
[0106] FIG. 70 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 25 mM thioglycerol (Example 2).
[0107] FIG. 71 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 50 mM thioglycerol (Example 2).
[0108] FIG. 72 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 100 mM thioglycerol (Example 2).
[0109] FIG. 73 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 6.25 mM mercaptoethanol (Example 2).
[0110] FIG. 74 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 12.5 mM mercaptoethanol (Example 2).
[0111] FIG. 75 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 25 mM mercaptoethanol (Example 2).
[0112] FIG. 76 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 50 mM mercaptoethanol (Example 2).
[0113] FIG. 77 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 100 mM mercaptoethanol (Example 2).
[0114] FIG. 78 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 6.25 mM TCEP (Example 2).
[0115] FIG. 79 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 12.5 mM TCEP (Example 2).
[0116] FIG. 80 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 25 mM TCEP (Example 2).
[0117] FIG. 81 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 50 mM TCEP (Example 2).
[0118] FIG. 82 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with 100 mM TCEP (Example 2).
[0119] FIG. 83 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with a mixture of 25 mM L-ascorbic acid and 25 mM DTT (Example 3).
[0120] FIG. 84 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with a mixture of 25 mM L-ascorbic acid and 25 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 3).
[0121] FIG. 85 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with a mixture of 25 mM L-ascorbic acid and 25 mM thioglycerol (Example 3).
[0122] FIG. 86 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with a mixture of 25 mM L-ascorbic acid and 25 mM mercaptoethanol (Example 3).
[0123] FIG. 87 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with a mixture of 25 mM L-ascorbic acid and 25 mM TCEP (Example 3).
[0124] FIG. 88 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with a mixture of 25 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride and 25 mM DTT (Example 3).
[0125] FIG. 89 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with a mixture of 25 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride and 25 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 3).
[0126] FIG. 90 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with a mixture of 25 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride and 25 mM thioglycerol (Example 3).
[0127] FIG. 91 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with a mixture of 25 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride and 25 mM mercaptoethanol (Example 3).
[0128] FIG. 92 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with a mixture of 25 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride and 25 mM TCEP (Example 3).
[0129] FIG. 93 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with a mixture of 25 mM glutathione and 25 mM DTT (Example 3).
[0130] FIG. 94 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with a mixture of 25 mM glutathione and 25 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 3).
[0131] FIG. 95 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with a mixture of 25 mM glutathione and 25 mM thioglycerol (Example 3).
[0132] FIG. 96 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with a mixture of 25 mM glutathione and 25 mM mercaptoethanol (Example 3).
[0133] FIG. 97 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with a mixture of 25 mM glutathione and 25 mM TCEP (Example 3).
[0134] FIG. 98 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with a mixture of 25 mM L-ascorbic acid and 25 mM DTT (Example 4).
[0135] FIG. 99 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with a mixture of 25 mM L-ascorbic acid and 25 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 4).
[0136] FIG. 100 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with a mixture of 25 mM L-ascorbic acid and 25 mM thioglycerol (Example 4).
[0137] FIG. 101 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with a mixture of 25 mM L-ascorbic acid and 25 mM mercaptoethanol (Example 4).
[0138] FIG. 102 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with a mixture of 25 mM L-ascorbic acid and 25 mM TCEP (Example 4).
[0139] FIG. 103 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with a mixture of 25 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride and 25 mM DTT (Example 4).
[0140] FIG. 104 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with a mixture of 25 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride and 25 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 4).
[0141] FIG. 105 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with a mixture of 25 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride and 25 mM thioglycerol (Example 4).
[0142] FIG. 106 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with a mixture of 25 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride and 25 mM mercaptoethanol (Example 4).
[0143] FIG. 107 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with a mixture of 25 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride and 25 mM TCEP (Example 4).
[0144] FIG. 108 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with a mixture of 25 mM glutathione and 25 mM DTT (Example 4).
[0145] FIG. 109 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with a mixture of 25 mM glutathione and 25 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 4).
[0146] FIG. 110 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with a mixture of 25 mM glutathione and 25 mM thioglycerol (Example 4).
[0147] FIG. 111 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with a mixture of 25 mM glutathione and 25 mM mercaptoethanol (Example 4).
[0148] FIG. 112 is a graph showing P.g detection sensitivities at different analysis times, in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a solution method with a mixture of 25 mM glutathione and 25 mM TCEP (Example 4).
[0149] FIG. 113(a) to (b) are graphs showing time-dependent change in analysis for different P.g bacteria concentrations in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method without addition of a first compound or second compound (Comparative Example 1). FIG. 113(c) to (d) are graphs showing time-dependent change in analysis for different P.g bacteria concentrations in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 25 mM L-ascorbic acid (Example 1). FIG. 113(e) to (f) are graphs showing time-dependent change in analysis for different P.g bacteria concentrations in a method of analyzing periodontopathic bacteria using a dry retention method with 25 mM thioglycolic acid (Example 1).
MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0150] Although examples of the present invention shall now be described specifically, these examples do not limit the scope of the present invention.
[0151] (Preparation of First Compounds and Second Compounds)
[0152] As compounds (first compounds) having an antioxidant effect, 62.5 mM, 125 mM, 250 mM, 500 mM, and 1000 mM of each of L-ascorbic acid, L-cysteine hydrochloride, and glutathione were sampled, and each of the sampled first compounds was dissolved in 50 mM tris-maleate buffer solution pH 8.5 and thereafter, pH adjustment was performed such that the pH became 8.5.
[0153] As compounds (second compounds) having action of protecting SH groups and cleaving disulfide bonds, each of DTT, thioglycolic acid, thioglycerol, mercaptoethanol, and TCEP were dissolved in 50 mM tris-maleate buffer solution pH 8.5 to concentrations of 62.6 mM, 125 mM, 250 mM, 500 mM, and 1000 mM and thereafter, pH adjustment was performed such that the pH became 8.5.
[0154] (Preparation of Substrate)
[0155] As a substrate, N-α-benzoyl-DL-arginine-2-naphthylamide hydrochloride (obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Japan LLC) was dissolved in 50 mM tris-maleate buffer solution pH 8.5. The substrate concentration is 0.11% by weight.
[0156] (Preparation of Coloring Solution)
[0157] 4-(dimethylamino) cinnamaldehyde (DMAC) (obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Japan LLC) was dissolved in 1 mol/L hydrochloric acid. The concentration of DMAC is 0.1% by weight.
[0158] (Culturing of P. g bacteria (sample))
[0159] Prepared Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. g bacteria) JCM12257 was inoculated into a broth medium and anaerobically cultured at 37° C. for 24 hours and a bacterial culture solution of 1.0×10.sup.7 cfu/mL was obtained.
[0160] The broth medium was prepared with 3.0 g of trypticase soy broth, 0.5 g of yeast extract, 0.05 g of L-cysteine hydrochloride, 0.1 mL of hemin solution, 0.02 mL of vitamin K1 solution, and 100 mL of distilled water and after preparation, sterilization at 121° C. was performed for 15 minutes.
[0161] With the hemin solution, 0.005 g of hemin and 0.0174 g of potassium hydrogen phosphate were dissolved in 1 mL of distilled water. With the vitamin K1 solution, 5 mg of vitamin K1 were dissolved in 1 mL of ethanol.
[0162] As a method for measuring bacterial count, the broth culture solution after anaerobic culturing was 10-fold serially diluted with sterilized physiological saline and inoculated onto CDC anaerobe sheep blood agar (obtained from Becton, Dickinson and Co.) and thereafter, anaerobic culturing at 37° C. was performed for 48 hours and bacterial count measurement was performed by counting colonies grown on the medium with the naked eye.
(Example 1) Implementation of Dry Retention Method with Addition of a First Compound or a Second Compound Alone
[0163] (A) Dry Retention of Substrate and First Compound or Second Compound
[0164] A prepared first compound or second compound and the substrate were mixed at a ratio of 1:9, and 10 mm paper disks (obtained from Advantec Co., Ltd.) were impregnated with 80 μL of the mixture per disk. The paper disks were then dried overnight at 25° C.
[0165] (B) Preparation of P. g
[0166] The bacterial culture solution after 24 hours of culturing was 10-fold serially diluted with 50 mM tris-maleate buffer solution pH 8.5 to prepare bacterial suspensions of 1.0×10.sup.6 cfu/mL, 1.0×10.sup.5 cfu/mL, 1.0×10.sup.4 cfu/mL, and 1.0×10.sup.3 cfu/mL.
[0167] (C) Test Method
[0168] Two of the paper disks, impregnated with the first compound or the second compound of each concentration and the substrate and then each impregnated with 80 μL of the prepared P. g bacterial suspension, were prepared and left to stand respectively for 2 minutes, 5 minutes, 8 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, and 20 minutes, one at room temperature and the other at 50° C. The former shall be referred to as room temperature analysis and the latter as 50° C. analysis. Thereafter, 30 μL of the coloring solution was dripped onto each paper disk and coloration of each paper disk was observed and judged with the naked eye.
[0169] (D) Results
[0170] FIG. 1 shows P.g detection sensitivities without addition of a first compound or second compound. As shown in FIG. 1, only 1.0×10.sup.6 cfu/mL could be detected even after 20 minutes in room temperature analysis in the absence of the first compound or second compound, but with 50° C. analysis, detection of up to 1.0×10.sup.4 cfu/mL was possible at 5 minutes, indicating that 50° C. analysis has a detection sensitivity of 100-fold compared to room temperature, in a short period of time.
[0171] FIG. 2 to FIG. 6 show detection times and detection sensitivities in the presence of L-ascorbic acid as the first compound. FIG. 7 to FIG. 11 show detection times and detection sensitivities in the presence of L-cysteine hydrochloride as the first compound. FIG. 12 to FIG. 16 show detection times and detection sensitivities in the presence of glutathione as the first compound. FIG. 17 to FIG. 21 show detection times and detection sensitivities in the presence of DTT as the second compound. FIG. 22 to FIG. 26 show detection times and detection sensitivities in the presence of thioglycolic acid as the second compound. FIG. 27 to FIG. 31 show detection times and detection sensitivities in the presence of thioglycerol as the second compound. FIG. 32 to FIG. 36 show detection times and detection sensitivities in the presence of mercaptoethanol as the second compound. FIG. 37 to FIG. 41 show detection times and detection sensitivities in the presence of TCEP as the second compound. It was shown that sensitivity obtained with 50° C. analysis is obtained in an equivalent manner in the presence of a first compound or second compound at an analysis time of less than 10 minutes, even with room temperature analysis. In other words, it was shown that a difference in sensitivity of 100-fold was found between room temperature analysis and 50° C. analysis in the absence of a first compound or second compound, with the minimum bacterial concentration (P.g at 1×10.sup.4 cfu/mL) being undetectable even at 20 minutes, but that in the presence of a first compound or second compound, with any of the compounds, even with room temperature analysis it is possible to detect the minimum bacterial concentration in a manner equivalent to 50° C. analysis in less than 10 minutes, though with some differences in minimum reaction time depending on the type of compound. Table 1 shows a comparison between minimum analysis times allowing detection of the minimum bacterial concentration in the presence of different concentrations of first compounds and second compounds, for room temperature analysis and 50° C. analysis. As shown in Table 1, it was confirmed that the effects of the first compound and second compound had wide optimal concentrations, though with differences in minimum analysis time depending on the types and concentrations of the compounds, and detection of the minimum bacterial concentration was possible in less than 10 minutes at room temperature. Another surprising result was that detection of the minimum bacterial concentration was possible within 2 minutes at room temperature, depending on the types and concentrations of the compounds.
[0172] When an enzyme reaction is carried out with a sufficient amount of substrate concentration, the reaction rate changes depending on the concentration of the detection substance, with a higher detection substance concentration allowing the reaction to reach a steady state in a shorter time, and conversely with a lower detection substance concentration requiring more time for the reaction to reach a steady state. In the presence of the first compound and second compound, however, as shown in FIG. 113, it was confirmed that a steady state is reached with a low bacterial concentration in a similar time as with a high concentration. The ordinate of the graph represents color intensity in analysis according to the invention (a higher value representing more stronger color development) and the abscissa represents reaction time. In the absence of the first compound and second compound, reaction was only observed at 1×10.sup.6 cfu/mL with room temperature analysis, and a steady state was not reached even after 20 minutes. In the presence of a first compound and second compound, however, reaction was observed with a P.g bacterial concentration of 1×10.sup.4 cfu/mL even with room temperature analysis, with a steady state being reached at about the same reaction time at all of the bacterial concentrations. Even with 50° C. analysis, it was also confirmed that a steady state was reached earlier in the presence of a first compound and second compound than in their absence. In other words, it was demonstrated that the presence of a first compound and second compound allows a steady state to be reached at about the same time at any bacterial concentration, even with room temperature analysis.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Room temperature analysis 50° C. analysis Compound concentration mM Type of compound 0 6.25 12.5 25 50 100 0 6.25 12.5 25 50 100 First L-ascorbic x 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 compound acid min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. L-cysteine 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 hydrochloride min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. Glutathione 5 5 2 2 2 5 5 2 2 5 min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. Second DTT 5 5 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 2 compound min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. Thioglycolic 8 5 2 2 5 5 5 2 2 5 acid min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. Thioglycerol 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. Mercaptoethanol 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. TCEP 5 5 5 10 x 5 5 5 10 x min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. x: 1 × 10.sup.4 cfu/mL undetectable
(Example 2) Implementation of Solution Method with Addition of a First Compound or a Second Compound Alone
[0173] (A) Dry Retention of Substrate
[0174] The prepared substrate was mixed in 50 mM tris-maleate buffer solution pH 8.5 such that a volume ratio would be 9:1 and 10 mm paper disks (obtained from Advantec Co., Ltd.) were impregnated with 80 μL of the mixture per disk. The paper disks were then dried overnight at 25° C.
[0175] (B) Preparation of P.g Bacteria
[0176] The prepared first compound or second compound was diluted 9-fold with 50 mM tris-maleate buffer solution pH 8.5 to obtain a diluted solution of the compound.
[0177] The bacterial culture solution after 24 hours of culturing was 10-fold serially diluted with the diluted compound solutions to prepare bacterial suspensions of 1.0×10.sup.6 cfu/mL, 1.0×10.sup.5 cfu/mL, 1.0×10.sup.4 cfu/mL, and 1.0×10.sup.3 cfu/mL.
[0178] (C) Test Method
[0179] Two of the paper disks, impregnated with the substrate and then impregnated with 80 μL of the prepared P. g bacterial suspension, were prepared and left to stand respectively for 2 minutes, 5 minutes, 8 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, and 20 minutes, one at room temperature and the other at 50° C. The former shall be referred to as room temperature analysis and the latter as 50° C. analysis. Thereafter, 30 μL of the coloring solution was dripped onto each paper disk and coloration of each paper disk was observed and judged with the naked eye.
[0180] (D) Results
[0181] FIG. 42 shows P.g detection sensitivities without addition of the first compound or second compound. As shown in FIG. 42, only 1.0×10.sup.6 cfu/mL could be detected even after 20 minutes in room temperature analysis in the absence of the first compound or second compound, but with 50° C. analysis, detection of up to 1.0×10.sup.4 cfu/mL was possible at 5 minutes, indicating that 50° C. analysis has a detection sensitivity of 100-fold compared to room temperature, in a short period of time.
[0182] FIG. 43 to FIG. 47 show detection times and detection sensitivities in the presence of L-ascorbic acid as the first compound. FIG. 48 to FIG. 52 show detection times and detection sensitivities in the presence of L-cysteine hydrochloride as the first compound. FIG. 53 to FIG. 57 show detection times and detection sensitivities in the presence of glutathione as the first compound. FIG. 58 to FIG. 62 show detection times and detection sensitivities in the presence of DTT as the second compound. FIG. 63 to FIG. 67 show detection times and detection sensitivities in the presence of thioglycolic acid as the second compound. FIG. 68 to FIG. 72 show detection times and detection sensitivities in the presence of thioglycerol as the second compound. FIG. 73 to FIG. 77 show detection times and detection sensitivities in the presence of mercaptoethanol as the second compound. FIG. 78 to FIG. 82 show detection times and detection sensitivities in the presence of TCEP as the second compound.
[0183] Similar to the results for the dry retention method in Example 1, it was shown that in the presence of a first compound or second compound, sensitivity obtained with 50° C. analysis is obtained in an equivalent manner at a reaction time of less than 10 minutes, even at room temperature. In other words, it was shown that a difference in sensitivity of 100-fold was found between room temperature analysis and 50° C. analysis in the absence of a first compound or second compound, with the minimum bacterial concentration (P.g at 1×10.sup.4 cfu/mL) being undetectable even at 20 minutes, but that in the presence of a first compound or second compound, with any of the compounds, even with room temperature analysis it is possible to detect the minimum bacterial concentration in a manner equivalent to 50° C. analysis in less than 10 minutes, though with some differences in minimum analysis time depending on the type of compound. Table 2 shows a comparison between minimum analysis times allowing detection of the minimum bacterial concentration in the presence of different concentrations of first compounds and second compounds, for room temperature analysis and 50° C. analysis. As shown in Table 2, it was confirmed that the effects of the first compound and second compound had wide optimal concentrations, though with differences in minimum analysis time depending on the types and concentrations of the compounds, and detection of the minimum bacterial concentration was possible in less than 10 minutes at room temperature. With thioglycolic acid and TCEP, however, while it was possible to detect the minimum bacterial concentration in less than 10 minutes by the dry retention method in Example 1, detection was not possible by the solution method. This is believed to be due to the effect of the second compound being added directly to the bacterial culture solution.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Room temperature analysis 50° C. analysis Compound concentration mM Type of compound 0 6.25 12.5 25 50 100 0 6.25 12.5 25 50 100 First L-ascorbic x 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 compound acid min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. L-cysteine 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 hydrochloride min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. Glutathione 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. Second DTT 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 compound min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. Thioglycolic 10 10 10 10 x 8 8 8 10 15 acid min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. Thioglycerol 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. Mercaptoethanol 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. TCEP 10 10 10 10 x 8 10 10 10 x min. min. min. min. min. min. min. min. x: 1 × 10.sup.4 cfu/mL undetectable
[0184] It has become clear that while sufficient sensitivity cannot be obtained in room temperature analysis for enzyme activity having an optimal temperature of 50 to 60° C., the present invention enables, by dry retention in a water absorbent material or addition to an sample of a first compound having an antioxidant effect or a compound having action of protecting SH groups and cleaving disulfide bonds, analyzing the enzyme activity in less than 10 minutes at a sensitivity equivalent to 50° C. analysis even with room temperature analysis.
(Example 3) Implementation of Dry Retention Method with Mixed Addition of a First Compound and a Second Compound
[0185] (A) Mixed Preparations of First Compounds and Second Compounds
[0186] The first compounds and the second compounds were mixed in combinations shown in Table 3. Mixing concentrations were adjusted by dissolving 500 mM of each of a first compound and a second compound in 50 mM tris-maleate buffer solution pH 8.5 and thereafter mixing equivalent amounts of the first compound and the second compound such that the concentration of each would be 250 mM.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 First compound Second compound L-ascorbic acid DTT L-ascorbic acid Thioglycolic acid L-ascorbic acid Thioglycerol L-ascorbic acid Mercaptoethanol L-ascorbic acid TCEP L-cysteine hydrochloride DTT L-cysteine hydrochloride Thioglycolic acid L-cysteine hydrochloride Thioglycerol L-cysteine hydrochloride Mercaptoethanol L-cysteine hydrochloride TCEP Glutathione DTT Glutathione Thioglycolic acid Glutathione Thioglycerol Glutathione Mercaptoethanol Glutathione TCEP
[0187] (B) Dry Retention of Substrate and Mixture of First Compound and Second Compound
[0188] A solution with a first compound and a second compound mixed and the prepared substrate were mixed at a ratio of 1:9, and 10 mm paper disks (obtained from Advantec Co., Ltd.) were impregnated with 80 μL of the mixture per disk. The paper disks were then dried overnight at 25° C. (Final concentration of each of the first compound and the second compound mixed was 25 mM.)
[0189] (C) Preparation of P. g Bacteria
[0190] The bacterial culture solution after 24 hours of culturing was 10-fold serially diluted with 50 mM tris-maleate buffer solution pH 8.5 to prepare bacterial suspensions of 1.0×10.sup.6 cfu/mL, 1.0×10.sup.5 cfu/mL, 1.0×10.sup.4 cfu/mL, and 1.0×10.sup.3 cfu/mL.
[0191] (D) Test Method
[0192] Two of the paper disks, impregnated with the mixture of the first compound and the second compound and the substrate and then each impregnated with 80 μL of the prepared P. g bacterial suspension, were prepared and left to stand respectively for 2 minutes, 5 minutes, 8 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, and 20 minutes, one at room temperature and the other at 50° C. The former shall be referred to as room temperature analysis and the latter as 50° C. analysis. Thereafter, 30 μL of the coloring solution was dripped onto each paper disk and coloration of each paper disk was observed and judged with the naked eye.
[0193] (E) Results
[0194] FIG. 83 to FIG. 97 show P.g detection sensitivities after adding mixtures of the first compound and second compound.
[0195] Table 4 shows minimum analysis times at which minimum bacterial concentrations could be detected with combinations of added mixtures of the first compound and second compound. As shown in the graphs and table, except for the combination of glutathione and TCEP, detection of the minimum bacterial concentration was possible in less than 10 minutes, similar to addition of the first compound or second compound alone. This indicated a result that detection is possible in less than 10 minutes by room temperature analysis and 50° C. analysis at equivalent sensitivity even when the first compound and second compound are used in admixture, similar to their use alone.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Room temperature 50° C. analysis analysis First compound and Type of compound second compound First Second concentration mM compound compound 0 25 + 25 0 25 + 25 L-ascorbic DTT x 2 min. 5 min. 2 min. acid Thioglycolic acid 2 min. 2 min. Thioglycerol 2 min. 5 min. Mercaptoethanol 2 min. 2 min. TCEP 5 min. 2 min. L-cysteine DTT 2 min. 2 min. hydrochloride Thioglycolic acid 2 min. 2 min. Thioglycerol 2 min. 2 min. Mercabtoethanol 2 min. 2 min. TCEP 8 min. 8 min. Glutathione DTT 2 min. 2 min. Thioglycolic acid 2 min. 2 min. Thioglycerol 2 min. 2 min. Mercaptoethanol 2 min. 2 min. TCEP 10 min. 10 min. x: 1 × 10.sup.4 cfu/mL undetectable
(Example 4) Implementation of Solution Method with Mixed Addition of a First Compound and a Second Compound
[0196] (A) Mixed Preparations of First Compounds and Second Compounds
[0197] The first compounds and the second compounds were mixed in combinations shown in Table 3. Mixing concentrations were adjusted by dissolving 55.5 mM of each of a first compound and a second compound in 50 mM tris-maleate buffer solution pH 8.5 and thereafter mixing equivalent amounts of the first compound and the second compound such that the concentration of each would be 27.75 mM.
[0198] (B) Dry Retention of Substrate
[0199] The prepared substrate was mixed with 50 mM tris-maleate buffer solution pH 8.5 such that a volume ratio would be 9:1 and 10 mm paper disks (obtained from Advantec Co., Ltd.) were impregnated with 80 μL of the mixture per disk. The paper disks were then dried overnight at 25° C.
[0200] (C) Preparation of P.g
[0201] The bacterial culture solution after 24 hours of culturing was 10-fold serially diluted with the prepared mixtures of first compounds and second compounds to prepare bacterial suspensions of 1.0×10.sup.6 cfu/mL, 1.0×10.sup.5 cfu/mL, 1.0×10.sup.4 cfu/mL, and 1.0×10.sup.3 cfu/mL.
[0202] (D) Test Method
[0203] Two of the paper disks, impregnated with the substrate and then each impregnated with 80 μL of the prepared P. g bacterial suspension, were prepared and left to stand respectively for 2 minutes, 5 minutes, 8 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, and 20 minutes, one at room temperature and the other at 50° C. The former shall be referred to as room temperature analysis and the latter as 50° C. analysis. Thereafter, 30 μL of the coloring solution was dripped onto each paper disk and coloration of each paper disk was observed and judged with the naked eye.
[0204] (E) Results
[0205] FIG. 98 to FIG. 112 show P.g detection sensitivities after adding mixtures of the first compound and second compound. Table 5 shows minimum analysis times at which minimum bacterial concentrations could be detected with combinations of added mixtures of the first compound and second compound. As shown in the graphs and table, except for the combinations of L-ascorbic acid/DTT, L-ascorbic acid/TCEP, L-cysteine hydrochloride/DTT, L-cysteine hydrochloride/TCEP, glutathione/DTT, and glutathione/TCEP, it was confirmed that sensitivity was equivalent with room temperature analysis and 50° C. analysis and detection of minimum bacterial concentration was possible in less than 10 minutes, similar to addition of the first compound or second compound alone.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Room temperature 50° C. analysis analysis First compound and Type of compound second compound First Second concentration mM compound compound 0 25 + 25 0 25 + 25 L-ascorbic acid DTT x 10 min. 5 10 min. L-ascorbic acid Thioglycolic acid 5 min. min. 2 min. L-ascorbic acid Thioglycerol 5 min. 2 min. L-ascorbic acid Mercaptoethanol 5 min. 2 min. L-ascorbic acid TCEP 10 min. 10 min. L-cysteine DTT 10 min. 10 min. hydrochloride L-cysteine Thioglycolic acid 5 min. 2 min. hydrochloride L-cysteine Thioglycerol 5 min. 2 min. hydrochloride L-cysteine Mercaptoethanol 5 min. 2 min. hydrochloride L-cysteine TCEP 10 min. 10 min. hydrochloride Glutathione DTT 10 min. 10 min. Glutathione Thioglycolic acid 5 min. 5 min. Glutathione Thioglycerol 5 min. 5 min. G1utathione Mercaptoethanol 5 min. 5 min. Glutathione TCEP 10 min. 10 min. x: 1 × 10.sup.4 cfu/mL undetectable
[0206] It has become clear that while sufficient sensitivity cannot be obtained in room temperature analysis for enzyme activity having an optimal temperature of 50 to 60° C. and the analysis time is also lengthened, the present invention enables, by dry retention in a water absorbent material or addition to an sample of a first compound having an antioxidant effect or a compound having action of protecting SH groups and cleaving disulfide bonds, analyzing the enzyme activity in less than 10 minutes at a sensitivity equivalent to 50° C. analysis even with room temperature analysis.
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
[0207] The present invention is useful for technologies in periodontopathic bacteria detection and diagnosis for easily performing ascertainment to make risk judgments and checks of degree of progress of periodontal disease as well as checks of treatment effects, etc.
