DETECTION OF COLONIC NEOPLASIA IN VIVO USING NEAR-INFRARED PEPTIDE TARGETED AGAINST OVEREXPRESSED CMET
20220193271 · 2022-06-23
Inventors
Cpc classification
A61P1/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
The disclosure provides peptides, including labeled peptides, that selectively bind to the cMet protein. The disclosure also provides methods of detecting dysplastic cells and tissue, e.g., in the colon, providing early identification of precancerous and cancerous tissue.
Claims
1. A peptide comprising the amino acid sequence QQTNWSL set forth in SEQ ID NO:1.
2. The peptide according to claim 1 wherein the peptide is derivatized.
3. The peptide according to claim 2 wherein the peptide is derivatized by attachment to a linker.
4. The peptide according to claim 3 wherein the linker comprises the sequence GGGSK set forth in SEQ ID NO:2.
5. The peptide according to claim 2 wherein the derivatized peptide is labeled.
6. The peptide according to claim 5 wherein the peptide label is a fluorescent label.
7. The peptide according to claim 5 wherein the label is FITC, Cy 5.5, Cy 7, Li-Cor, a radiolabel, biotin, luciferase, 1,8-ANS (1-Anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonic acid), 1-Anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonic acid (1,8-ANS), 5-(and-6)-Carboxy-2′, 7′-dichlorofluorescein pH 9.0, 5-FAM pH 9.0, 5-ROX (5-Carboxy-X-rhodamine, triethylammonium salt), 5-ROX pH 7.0, 5-TAMRA, 5-TAMRA pH 7.0, 5-TAMRA-MeOH, 6 JOE, 6,8-Difluoro-7-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin pH 9.0, 6-Carboxyrhodamine 6G pH 7.0, 6-Carboxyrhodamine 6G, hydrochloride, 6-HEX, SE pH 9.0, 6-TET, SE pH 9.0, 7-Amino-4-methylcoumarin pH 7.0, 7-Hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin, 7-Hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin pH 9.0, Alexa 350, Alexa 405, Alexa 430, Alexa 488, Alexa 532, Alexa 546, Alexa 555, Alexa 568, Alexa 594, Alexa 647, Alexa 660, Alexa 680, Alexa 700, Alexa Fluor 430 antibody conjugate pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 488 antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Alexa Fluor 488 hydrazide-water, Alexa Fluor 532 antibody conjugate pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 555 antibody conjugate pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 568 antibody conjugate pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 610 R-phycoerythrin streptavidin pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 647 antibody conjugate pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 647 R-phycoerythrin streptavidin pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 660 antibody conjugate pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 680 antibody conjugate pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 700 antibody conjugate pH 7.2, Allophycocyanin pH 7.5, AMCA conjugate, Amino Coumarin, APC (allophycocyanin), Atto 647, BCECF pH 5.5, BCECF pH 9.0, BFP (Blue Fluorescent Protein), Calcein, Calcein pH 9.0, Calcium Crimson, Calcium Crimson Ca2+, Calcium Green, Calcium Green-1 Ca2+, Calcium Orange, Calcium Orange Ca2+, Carboxynaphthofluorescein pH 10.0, Cascade Blue, Cascade Blue BSA pH 7.0, Cascade Yellow, Cascade Yellow antibody conjugate pH 8.0, CFDA, CFP (Cyan Fluorescent Protein), CI-NERF pH 2.5, CI-NERF pH 6.0, Citrine, Coumarin, Cy 2, Cy 3, Cy 3.5, Cy 5, CyQUANT GR-DNA, Dansyl Cadaverine, Dansyl Cadaverine, MeOH, DAPI, DAPI-DNA, Dapoxyl (2-aminoethyl) sulfonamide, DDAO pH 9.0, Di-8 ANEPPS, Di-8-ANEPPS-lipid, DiI, DiO, DM-NERF pH 4.0, DM-NERF pH 7.0, DsRed, DTAF, dTomato, eCFP (Enhanced Cyan Fluorescent Protein), eGFP (Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein), Eosin, Eosin antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Erythrosin-5-isothiocyanate pH 9.0, eYFP (Enhanced Yellow Fluorescent Protein), FDA, FITC antibody conjugate pH 8.0, FlAsH, Fluo-3, Fluo-3 Ca2.sup.+, Fluo-4, Fluor-Ruby, Fluorescein, Fluorescein 0.1 M NaOH, Fluorescein antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Fluorescein dextran pH 8.0, Fluorescein pH 9.0, Fluoro-Emerald, FM 1-43, FM 1-43 lipid, FM 4-64, FM 4-64, 2% CHAPS, Fura Red Ca2.sup.+, Fura Red, high Ca, Fura Red, low Ca, Fura-2 Ca2+, Fura-2, Fura-2, GFP (S65T), HcRed, Indo-1 Ca2.sup.+, Indo-1, Ca free, Indo-1, Ca saturated, JC-1, JC-1 pH 8.2, Lissamine rhodamine, Lucifer Yellow, CH, Magnesium Green, Magnesium Green Mg2+, Magnesium Orange, Marina Blue, mBanana, mCherry, mHoneydew, mOrange, mPlum, mRFP, mStrawberry, mTangerine, NBD-X, NBD-X, MeOH, NeuroTrace 500/525, green fluorescent Nissl stain-RNA, Nile Blue, Nile Red, Nile Red-lipid, Nissl, Oregon Green 488, Oregon Green 488 antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Oregon Green 514, Oregon Green 514 antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Pacific Blue, Pacific Blue antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Phycoerythrin, R-Phycoerythrin pH 7.5, ReAsH, Resorufin, Resorufin pH 9.0, Rhod-2, Rhod-2 Ca2+, Rhodamine, Rhodamine 110, Rhodamine 110 pH 7.0, Rhodamine 123, MeOH, Rhodamine Green, Rhodamine phalloidin pH 7.0, Rhodamine Red-X antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Rhodamine Green pH 7.0, Rhodol Green antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Sapphire, SBFI-Na.sup.+, Sodium Green Na.sup.+, Sulforhodamine 101, Tetramethylrhodamine antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Tetramethylrhodamine dextran pH 7.0, Texas Red-X antibody conjugate pH 7.2, .sup.11C, .sup.13N, .sup.15O .sup.18F, .sup.32P, .sup.52Fe, .sup.62Cu, .sup.64Cu, .sup.67Cu, .sup.67Ga, .sup.68Ga, .sup.86Y, .sup.89Zr, .sup.90Y, .sup.94mTc, .sup.94Tc, .sup.95Tc, .sup.99mTc, .sup.103Pd, .sup.105Rh, .sup.109Pd, .sup.111Ag, .sup.111In, .sup.123I, .sup.124I, .sup.125I, .sup.131I, .sup.140La, .sup.149Pm, .sup.153Sm, .sup.154-159Gd, .sup.165Dy, .sup.166Dy, .sup.166Ho, .sup.169Yb, .sup.175Yb, .sup.175Lu, .sup.177Lu, .sup.186Re, .sup.188Re, .sup.192Ir, .sup.198Au, .sup.199Au, or .sup.212Bi.
8. The peptide according to claim 6 wherein the fluorescent label emits in the near-infrared range of the electromagnetic spectrum.
9. The peptide according to claim 6 wherein the fluorescent label is FITC or a cyanine dye.
10. The peptide according to claim 9 wherein the cyanine dye is Cy5.5 or Cy7.
11. The peptide according to claim 1 consisting of the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1.
12. A method of detecting intestinal neoplasia comprising: (a) contacting intestine tissue with a labeled peptide comprising the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1; (b) measuring the binding of the labeled peptide to the intestine tissue; and (c) detecting intestinal neoplasia based on the measurement of binding.
13. The method according to claim 12 wherein the intestine tissue is colorectal tissue.
14. The method according to claim 13 wherein the colorectal tissue is colonic tissue.
15. The method according to claim 12 wherein the intestinal neoplasia is a precancerous lesion.
16. The method according to claim 12 wherein the intestinal neoplasia is cancer.
17. The method according to claim 16 wherein the cancer is colorectal cancer.
18. The method according to claim 12 wherein the intestine tissue binding the labeled peptide is not discernible as a polyp by endoscopic examination.
19. The method according to claim 12 wherein the intestine tissue is a polyp.
20. The method according to claim 12 wherein the binding occurs in vivo.
21. The method according to claim 12 further comprising fluorescence imaging in vivo.
22. The method according to claim 21 wherein the fluorescence imaging is obtained using a wide-area endoscope.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0050] Relatively small peptide-based fluorescent imaging probes specific for cancer biomarkers are expected to increase visualization of precancerous lesions with lower immunogenicity and quicker clearance. A few clinical studies have demonstrated that peptides can be used as diagnostic tool to guide tissue biopsy in the GI tract.sup.27,28. The relatively smaller size of peptides relative to antibodies allows the peptides to penetrate more easily into deep tissue, with minimal immunogenicity. Peptide-based imaging probes also exhibit high diversity and labeling flexibility at an affordable cost and with rapid binding kinetics. These benefits position peptides as agents well-suited for in vivo imaging and clinical use.
[0051] The disclosure provides a fluorescent-labeled peptide that is specific for cMet to detect premalignant dysplasia in CRC. The peptide was shown to detect, in vivo, pre-malignant colonic lesions that are flat in appearance and can easily be missed by colonoscopy with white light illumination. Using the biopanning technology with a phage display library, we identified a heptapeptide that specifically bound to the cMet extracellular domain. After labeling with near-infrared fluorescent dye Cy5.5, we topically administrated this peptide on mouse distal colon surface, which minimize toxicity and reduce the risk of binding to unexpected tissue. This peptide exhibited superior target-to-background (T/B) signal ratio relative to a scrambled control peptide. The functioning of the peptide as a probe or targeting ligand was examined in the experiments disclosed herein and the results demonstrate a peptide specific for cMet that is expected to be useful for endoscopic detection of pre-malignant lesions and for providing guidance in locating tissues for biopsy.
[0052] Phage display technology was used to biopan a linear hepta-peptide library against the extra-cellular domain (ECD) of cMet, and identified the heptapeptide sequence QQTNWSL (SEQ ID NO:1). We covalently linked the C-terminus of this linear monomer (black) with the near-infrared (NIR) fluorophore Cy5.5 (red) via a GGGSK (SEQ ID NO:2) linker (blue), hereafter QQT*-Cy5.5. The peptide is separated from the fluorophore to minimize effects of steric hindrance. Cy5.5 was chosen because it is less sensitive to hemoglobin absorption and tissue scattering, minimizes the effects of tissue autofluorescence, and provides the maximum light penetration depth. We achieved greater than 95% purity for both peptides with HPLC and measured an experimental mass-to-charge (m/z) ratio on mass spectrometry of 1827 which agrees with the expected value. We measured an apparent dissociation constant of K.sub.D=57 nM for peptide binding to HT29 human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells. Also, we measured an apparent association time constant k=0.622 min-1 (1.61 min).
[0053] Overexpression of cMet is an early event in CRC neoplasia, making the detection of cMet expression level a promising method to identify premalignant dysplasia in CRC.sup.20,21. In addition, its location on the cell membrane makes cMet accessible to imaging agents, such as fluorescent targeting agents. Consistently, elevated cMet levels have been reported in a variety of cancer types, especially colorectal cancer. Various preclinical and clinical findings have confirmed that cMet is a promising target for molecular imaging, which allows the monitoring of abnormal alterations in real time and in vivo.
[0054] Disclosed herein is a NIR-labeled cMet targeted peptide for in vivo fluorescence imaging in a Cpc;Apc spontaneously developing polyp mouse model and in a human organoid-transplanted mouse model. QQTNWSL (SEQ ID NO:1) was selected by biopanning with phage display against the cMet extracellular domain. Specific binding to cMet was validated in vitro and ex vivo using standard assays, such as competition and cell binding assays. This peptide exhibited a high binding affinity of kd=57 nM, with binding occurring within 2 min (k=0.622 min-1), which is compatible with clinical use during colonoscopy. In a spontaneous mouse model of CRC, we demonstrated this peptide was shown to be capable of detecting flat and polyploid colonic adenomas in vivo that were diagnosed as low-grade dysplasia on pathology. To more accurately model real human physiology, a human organoid-transplanted mouse model was developed. Through orthotopic injection, this mouse model developed colon polyps derived from human organoids, which authentically recapitulate human CRC. One of the important goals of advanced imaging techniques is to distinguish benign hyperplastic polyps from malignant lesions, such as serrated polyps, to avoid unnecessary costs and treatments.sup.47. The imaging results disclosed herein using the organoid-transplanted mouse model showed that the QQT*-Cy5.5 fluorescently labeled peptide bound to human adenoma and SSA, with minimal binding to normal organoids. IF staining of different subtypes of human proximal colon tissues with QQT*-Cy5.5 further confirmed this observation by showing that the fluorescently labeled peptide distinguished either adenoma or SSA from normal and HP with 88% sensitivity and 82% specificity with area-under-curve (AUC) of 0.94.
[0055] Molecular imaging probe-based antibodies targeted to cMet have been validated.sup.48,49. Although antibodies and antibody fragments can achieve high binding affinities, they are limited for diagnostics by slow binding kinetics, long half-lives, and increased background. Compared with antibodies, peptides are much safer and less costly, due to their lower molecular weight. Peptides have several advantages, such as favorable pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution patterns, higher permeability, lower toxicity, less immunogenicity, and easy accessibility for chemical modification.sup.50. Topical administration of peptides delivers the therapeutic directly to target tissue at risk of harboring disease in high concentrations to maximize binding interactions and to achieve high image contrast with little risk of toxicity. This approach avoids undesired biodistribution of the exogenous agent to other tissues characteristic of administration by, e.g., intravenous injection.
[0056] Recently, evidence has accumulated to suggest that cMet communicates with other cell-surface receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and cell-surface proteins associated with tumor formation and progression in colorectal cancer, such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR).sup.51,52 and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).sup.53,54. Due to the complexity and heterogeneity of disease in a broad patient population, multiplexed imaging methods using multiple targets may prove beneficial.sup.35,55.
Linkers and Polypeptides
[0057] As used herein, a “linker” is a sequence of amino acids, generally uncharged, located at a terminus of a peptide of the disclosure. In some embodiments, the linker sequence terminates with a lysine residue. Uncharged amino acids contemplated by the present disclosure include, but are not limited to, glycine, serine, cysteine, threonine, histidine, tyrosine, asparagine, and glutamine.
[0058] In some embodiments, the presence of a linker results in at least a 1% increase in detectable binding of a reagent of the disclosure to dysplastic colon cells or cancerous colon cells compared to the detectable binding of the reagent in the absence of the linker. In various aspects, the increase in detectable binding is at least 2%, at least 3%, at least 4%, at least 5%, at least 6%, at least 7%, at least 8%, at least 9%, at least 10%, at least 11%, at least 12%, at least 13%, at least 14%, at least 15%, at least 16%, at least 17%, at least 18%, at least 19%, at least 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 55%, at least about 60%, at least about 65%, at least about 70%, at least about 75%, at least about 80%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 99%, at least about 2-fold, at least about 3-fold, at least about 4-fold, at least about 5-fold, at least about 6-fold, at least about 7-fold, at least about 8-fold, at least about 9-fold, at least about 10-fold, at least about 15-fold, at least about 20-fold, at least about 25-fold, at least about 30-fold, at least about 35-fold, at least about 40-fold, at least about 45-fold, at least about 50-fold, at least about 100-fold or more.
[0059] The term “peptide” refers to molecules of 2 to 50 amino acids, molecules of 3 to 20 amino acids, and those of 6 to 15 amino acids. Peptides and linkers as contemplated by the invention may be 5 amino acids in length. In various aspects, a polypeptide or linker may be 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 or more amino acids in length.
[0060] Exemplary peptides are, in various aspects, randomly generated by methods known in the art, carried in a polypeptide library (for example and without limitation, a phage display library), derived by digestion of proteins, or chemically synthesized. Peptides exemplified in the present disclosure can be obtained using techniques of phage display, a powerful combinatorial method that uses recombinant DNA technology to generate a complex library of polypeptides for selection by preferential binding to cell surface targets [Scott et al., Science, 249:386-390 (1990)]. The protein coat of bacteriophage, such as the filamentous M13 or icosahedral T7, is genetically engineered to express a very large number (greater than 109) of different polypeptides with unique sequences to achieve affinity binding [Cwirla et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87:6378-6382 (1990)]. Selection is then performed by biopanning the phage library against cultured cells and tissues that over-express the target. The DNA sequences of these candidate phage are then recovered and used to synthesize the polypeptide [Pasqualini et al., Nature, 380:364-366 (1996)]. The polypeptides that preferentially bind to dysplastic mucosa are optionally labeled with fluorescence dyes, including but not limited to, FITC, Cy 5.5, Cy 7, and Li-Cor.
[0061] Peptides include D and L forms, either purified or in a mixture of the two forms. Also contemplated by the present disclosure are peptides that compete with peptides of the invention for binding to colon cells.
[0062] It will be understood that peptides and linkers of the invention optionally incorporate modifications known in the art and that the location and number of such modifications are varied to achieve an optimal effect.
Detectable Markers
[0063] As used herein, a “detectable marker” is any label that can be used to identify the binding of a composition of the disclosure to tissue of the intestine such as colon tissue. Non-limiting examples of detectable markers are fluorophores, chemical or protein tags that enable the visualization of a polypeptide. Visualization in certain aspects is carried out with the naked eye, or a device (for example and without limitation, an endoscope) and may also involve an alternate light or energy source.
[0064] Fluorophores, chemical and protein tags that are contemplated for use in the invention include but are not limited to FITC, Cy 5.5, Cy 7, Li-Cor, a radiolabel, biotin, luciferase, 1,8-ANS (1-Anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonic acid), 1-Anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonic acid (1,8-ANS), 5-(and-6)-Carboxy-2′, 7′-dichlorofluorescein pH 9.0, 5-FAM pH 9.0, 5-ROX (5-Carboxy-X-rhodamine, triethylammonium salt), 5-ROX pH 7.0, 5-TAMRA, 5-TAMRA pH 7.0, 5-TAMRA-MeOH, 6 JOE, 6,8-Difluoro-7-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin pH 9.0, 6-Carboxyrhodamine 6G pH 7.0, 6-Carboxyrhodamine 6G, hydrochloride, 6-HEX, SE pH 9.0, 6-TET, SE pH 9.0, 7-Amino-4-methylcoumarin pH 7.0, 7-Hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin, 7-Hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin pH 9.0, Alexa 350, Alexa 405, Alexa 430, Alexa 488, Alexa 532, Alexa 546, Alexa 555, Alexa 568, Alexa 594, Alexa 647, Alexa 660, Alexa 680, Alexa 700, Alexa Fluor 430 antibody conjugate pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 488 antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Alexa Fluor 488 hydrazide-water, Alexa Fluor 532 antibody conjugate pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 555 antibody conjugate pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 568 antibody conjugate pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 610 R-phycoerythrin streptavidin pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 647 antibody conjugate pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 647 R-phycoerythrin streptavidin pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 660 antibody conjugate pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 680 antibody conjugate pH 7.2, Alexa Fluor 700 antibody conjugate pH 7.2, Allophycocyanin pH 7.5, AMCA conjugate, Amino Coumarin, APC (allophycocyanin), Atto 647, BCECF pH 5.5, BCECF pH 9.0, BFP (Blue Fluorescent Protein), Calcein, Calcein pH 9.0, Calcium Crimson, Calcium Crimson Ca2+, Calcium Green, Calcium Green-1 Ca2+, Calcium Orange, Calcium Orange Ca2+, Carboxynaphthofluorescein pH 10.0, Cascade Blue, Cascade Blue BSA pH 7.0, Cascade Yellow, Cascade Yellow antibody conjugate pH 8.0, CFDA, CFP (Cyan Fluorescent Protein), CI-NERF pH 2.5, CI-NERF pH 6.0, Citrine, Coumarin, Cy 2, Cy 3, Cy 3.5, Cy 5, CyQUANT GR-DNA, Dansyl Cadaverine, Dansyl Cadaverine, MeOH, DAPI, DAPI-DNA, Dapoxyl (2-aminoethyl) sulfonamide, DDAO pH 9.0, Di-8 ANEPPS, Di-8-ANEPPS-lipid, DiI, DiO, DM-NERF pH 4.0, DM-NERF pH 7.0, DsRed, DTAF, dTomato, eCFP (Enhanced Cyan Fluorescent Protein), eGFP (Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein), Eosin, Eosin antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Erythrosin-5-isothiocyanate pH 9.0, eYFP (Enhanced Yellow Fluorescent Protein), FDA, FITC antibody conjugate pH 8.0, FlAsH, Fluo-3, Fluo-3 Ca2+, Fluo-4, Fluor-Ruby, Fluorescein, Fluorescein 0.1 M NaOH, Fluorescein antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Fluorescein dextran pH 8.0, Fluorescein pH 9.0, Fluoro-Emerald, FM 1-43, FM 1-43 lipid, FM 4-64, FM 4-64, 2% CHAPS, Fura Red Ca2+, Fura Red, high Ca, Fura Red, low Ca, Fura-2 Ca2+, Fura-2, Fura-2, GFP (S65T), HcRed, Indo-1 Ca2+, Indo-1, Ca free, Indo-1, Ca saturated, JC-1, JC-1 pH 8.2, Lissamine rhodamine, Lucifer Yellow, CH, Magnesium Green, Magnesium Green Mg2+, Magnesium Orange, Marina Blue, mBanana, mCherry, mHoneydew, mOrange, mPlum, mRFP, mStrawberry, mTangerine, NBD-X, NBD-X, MeOH, NeuroTrace 500/525, green fluorescent Nissl stain-RNA, Nile Blue, Nile Red, Nile Red-lipid, Nissl, Oregon Green 488, Oregon Green 488 antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Oregon Green 514, Oregon Green 514 antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Pacific Blue, Pacific Blue antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Phycoerythrin, R-Phycoerythrin pH 7.5, ReAsH, Resorufin, Resorufin pH 9.0, Rhod-2, Rhod-2 Ca2+, Rhodamine, Rhodamine 110, Rhodamine 110 pH 7.0, Rhodamine 123, MeOH, Rhodamine Green, Rhodamine phalloidin pH 7.0, Rhodamine Red-X antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Rhodamine Green pH 7.0, Rhodol Green antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Sapphire, SBFI-Na.sup.+, Sodium Green Na.sup.+, Sulforhodamine 101, Tetramethylrhodamine antibody conjugate pH 8.0, Tetramethylrhodamine dextran pH 7.0, and Texas Red-X antibody conjugate pH 7.2.
[0065] Non-limiting examples of chemical tags contemplated by the invention include radiolabels. For example and without limitation, radiolabels that contemplated in the compositions and methods of the present disclosure include .sup.11C, .sup.13N, .sup.15O, .sup.18F, .sup.32P, .sup.52Fe, .sup.62Cu, .sup.64Cu, .sup.67Cu, .sup.67Ga, .sup.68Ga, .sup.86Y, .sup.89Zr, .sup.90Y, .sup.94mTc, .sup.94Tc, .sup.95Tc, .sup.99mTc, .sup.103Pd, .sup.105Rh, .sup.109Pd, .sup.111Ag, .sup.111In .sup.123I, .sup.124I, .sup.125I, .sup.131I, .sup.140La, .sup.149Pm, .sup.153Sm, .sup.154-159Gd, .sup.165Dy, .sup.166Dy, .sup.166Ho, .sup.169Yb, .sup.175Yb, .sup.175Lu, .sup.177Lu, .sup.186Re, .sup.188Re, .sup.192, .sup.198Au, .sup.199Au, and .sup.212Bi.
[0066] A worker of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that there are many such detectable markers that can be used to visualize a composition of the disclosure, in vitro, in vivo or ex vivo.
Therapeutic Moieties
[0067] Therapeutic moieties contemplated by the invention include, but are not limited to, polypeptides or peptides, small molecules, therapeutic agents, chemotherapeutic agents, or combinations thereof.
[0068] The term “small molecule”, as used herein, refers to a chemical compound, for instance a peptidomimetic or oligonucleotide that may optionally be derivatized, or any other low molecular weight organic compound, either natural or synthetic.
[0069] By “low molecular weight” is meant compounds having a molecular weight of less than 1000 Daltons, typically between 300 and 700 Daltons. Low molecular weight compounds, in various aspects, are about 100, about 150, about 200, about 250, about 300, about 350, about 400, about 450, about 500, about 550, about 600, about 650, about 700, about 750, about 800, about 850, about 900, about 1000 or more Daltons.
[0070] In some aspects, the therapeutic moiety is a protein therapeutic. Protein therapeutics include, without limitation, cellular or circulating proteins as well as fragments and derivatives thereof. Still other therapeutic moieties include polynucleotides, including without limitation, protein coding polynucleotides, polynucleotides encoding regulatory polynucleotides, and/or polynucleotides which are regulatory in themselves. Optionally, the compositions comprise a combination of the compounds described herein.
[0071] In various aspects, protein therapeutics include cytokines or hematopoietic factors including without limitation IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-11, colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1), M-CSF, SCF, GM-CSF, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), EPO, interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), consensus interferon, IFN-beta, IFN-gamma, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-14, IL-15, IL-16, IL-17, IL-18, thrombopoietin (TPO), angiopoietins, for example Ang-1, Ang-2, Ang-4, Ang-Y, the human angiopoietin-like polypeptide, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), angiogenin, bone morphogenic protein-1, bone morphogenic protein-2, bone morphogenic protein-3, bone morphogenic protein-4, bone morphogenic protein-5, bone morphogenic protein-6, bone morphogenic protein-7, bone morphogenic protein-8, bone morphogenic protein-9, bone morphogenic protein-10, bone morphogenic protein-11, bone morphogenic protein-12, bone morphogenic protein-13, bone morphogenic protein-14, bone morphogenic protein-15, bone morphogenic protein receptor IA, bone morphogenic protein receptor IB, brain derived neurotrophic factor, ciliary neurotrophic factor, ciliary neurotrophic factor receptor, cytokine-induced neutrophil chemotactic factor 1, cytokine-induced neutrophil, chemotactic factor 2α, cytokine-induced neutrophil chemotactic factor 2β,β endothelial cell growth factor, endothelin 1, epidermal growth factor, epithelial-derived neutrophil attractant, fibroblast growth factor 4, fibroblast growth factor 5, fibroblast growth factor 6, fibroblast growth factor 7, fibroblast growth factor 8, fibroblast growth factor 8b, fibroblast growth factor 8c, fibroblast growth factor 9, fibroblast growth factor 10, fibroblast growth factor acidic, fibroblast growth factor basic, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor receptor α1, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor receptor α2, growth related protein, growth related protein α, growth related protein β, growth related protein γ, heparin binding epidermal growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor receptor, insulin-like growth factor I, insulin-like growth factor receptor, insulin-like growth factor II, insulin-like growth factor binding protein, keratinocyte growth factor, leukemia inhibitory factor, leukemia inhibitory factor receptor α, nerve growth factor nerve growth factor receptor, neurotrophin-3, neurotrophin-4, placenta growth factor, placenta growth factor 2, platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor, platelet derived growth factor, platelet derived growth factor A chain, platelet derived growth factor AA, platelet derived growth factor AB, platelet derived growth factor B chain, platelet derived growth factor BB, platelet derived growth factor receptor α, platelet derived growth factor receptor β, pre-B cell growth stimulating factor, stem cell factor receptor, TNF, including TNF0, TNF1, TNF2, transforming growth factor α, transforming growth factor β, transforming growth factor β1, transforming growth factor β1.2, transforming growth factor β2, transforming growth factor β3, transforming growth factor β5, latent transforming growth factor β1, transforming growth factor β binding protein I, transforming growth factor β binding protein II, transforming growth factor β binding protein III, tumor necrosis factor receptor type I, tumor necrosis factor receptor type II, urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and chimeric proteins and biologically or immunologically active fragments thereof.
[0072] Therapeutic moieties also include, in various embodiments, chemotherapeutic agents. A chemotherapeutic agent contemplated for use in a reagent of the invention includes, without limitation, alkylating agents including: nitrogen mustards, such as mechlorethamine, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, melphalan and chlorambucil; nitrosoureas, such as carmustine (BCNU), lomustine (CCNU), and semustine (methyl-CCNU); ethylenimines/methylmelamine such as triethylenemelamine (TEM), triethylene, thiophosphoramide (thiotepa), hexamethylmelamine (HMM, altretamine); alkyl sulfonates such as busulfan; triazines such as dacarbazine (DTIC); antimetabolites including folic acid analogs such as methotrexate and trimetrexate, pyrimidine analogs such as 5-fluorouracil, fluorodeoxyuridine, gemcitabine, cytosine arabinoside (AraC, cytarabine), 5-azacytidine, 2,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine, purine analogs such as 6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine, azathioprine, 2′-deoxycoformycin (pentostatin), erythrohydroxynonyladenine (EHNA), fludarabine phosphate, and 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (cladribine, 2-CdA); natural products including antimitotic drugs such as paclitaxel, vinca alkaloids including vinblastine (VLB), vincristine, and vinorelbine, taxotere, estramustine, and estramustine phosphate; epipodophylotoxins such as etoposide and teniposide; antibiotics such as actinomycin D, daunomycin (rubidomycin), doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, idarubicin, bleomycins, plicamycin (mithramycin), mitomycin C, and actinomycin; enzymes such as L-asparaginase; biological response modifiers such as interferon-alpha, IL-2, G-CSF and GM-CSF; miscellaneous agents including platinum coordination complexes such as cisplatin and carboplatin, anthracenediones such as mitoxantrone, substituted urea such as hydroxyurea, methylhydrazine derivatives including N-methylhydrazine (MIH) and procarbazine, adrenocortical suppressants such as mitotane (o,p′-DDD) and aminoglutethimide; hormones and antagonists including adrenocorticosteroid antagonists such as prednisone and equivalents, dexamethasone and aminoglutethimide; progestin such as hydroxyprogesterone caproate, medroxyprogesterone acetate and megestrol acetate; estrogen such as diethylstilbestrol and ethinyl estradiol equivalents; anti-estrogen such as tamoxifen; androgens including testosterone propionate and fluoxymesterone/equivalents; anti-androgens such as flutamide, gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs and leuprolide; and non-steroidal anti-androgens such as flutamide.
[0073] Dosages of the therapeutic moiety or reagent provided are administered as a dose measured in, for example, mg/kg. Contemplated mg/kg doses of the disclosed therapeutics include about 1 mg/kg to about 60 mg/kg. Specific ranges of doses in mg/kg include about 1 mg/kg to about 20 mg/kg, about 5 mg/kg to about 20 mg/kg, about 10 mg/kg to about 20 mg/kg, about 25 mg/kg to about 50 mg/kg, and about 30 mg/kg to about 60 mg/kg. The precise effective amount for a subject will depend upon the subject's body weight, size, general health, the nature and extent of any condition, and the therapeutic or combination of therapeutics selected for administration. Therapeutically effective amounts for a given situation can be determined by routine experimentation that is within the skill and judgment of the clinician.
[0074] “Effective amount” as used herein refers to an amount of a reagent of the invention sufficient to visualize the identified disease or condition, or to exhibit a detectable therapeutic or inhibitory effect. The effect is detected by, for example, an improvement in clinical condition or reduction in symptoms. The precise effective amount for a subject will depend upon the subject's body weight, size, general health, the nature and extent of the condition; and the therapeutic or combination of therapeutics selected for administration. Therapeutically effective amounts for a given situation can be determined by routine experimentation that is within the skill and judgment of the clinician.
Visualization of Reagents
[0075] Visualization of binding to colon cells is by any means known to those of ordinary skill in the art. As discussed herein, visualization is, for example and without limitation, in vivo, in vitro, ex vivo, or in situ visualization.
[0076] In one embodiment, visualization is performed via imaging and may be performed with a wide-area endoscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) that is designed specifically to collect fluorescence images with high spatial resolution over large mucosal surface areas on the macroscopic scale (millimeters to centimeters). This capability is needed to rapidly screen large surface areas such as that found in the distal esophagus during endoscopy to localize regions suspicious for disease [Wang et al., Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 1999; 49:447-55]. This technique has been adapted for fluorescence detection, and is compatible with dye-labeled probes. This instrument can image in three different modes, including white light (WL), narrow band imaging (NBI), and fluorescence imaging. Narrow-band imaging is a new technology that represents a variation of conventional white light illumination by altering the spectrum with optical filters to restrict or narrow the range of wavelengths.
[0077] The method enhances contrast in the endoscopic images to provide more visual details of the esophageal mucosa by tuning the light to maximize absorption of hemoglobin present in the vasculature of regions of intestinal metaplasia. The WL and NBI images are collected by the central objective lens, and the fluorescence image is collected by a second objective lens located near the periphery. There is a distance of approximately 3 mm between the centers of the white light and fluorescence objectives that results in only a slight misregistration of the two images. Furthermore, there is an air/water nozzle that removes debris from the objective lenses, and a 2.8 mm diameter instrument channel that can be used to deliver biopsy forceps. The objectives are forward viewing and have a field of view (FOV), defined by maximum angle of illumination, of 140 degrees. The WL/NBI imaging modes have a depth of field (DOF), defined by range of distances between the distal end of the endoscope to the mucosal surface whereby the image is in focus, of 7 to 100 mm, and that for fluorescence is 5 to 100 mm. The transverse resolution measured at a distance of 10 mm from the mucosa for WL/NBI is 15 m and for fluorescence is m. A xenon light source provides the illumination for all three modes, which is determined by a filter wheel located in the image processor. Illumination for all three modes of imaging is delivered through the two fiber light guides. In the WL mode, the full visible spectrum (400 to 700 nm) is provided, while in the NBI mode, a filter wheel narrows the spectral bands in the red, green, and blue regime. In the fluorescence mode, a second filter wheel enters the illumination path, and provides fluorescence excitation in the 395 to 475 nm spectral band. In addition, illumination from 525 to 575 nm provides reflected light in the green spectral regime centered at 550 nm. The fluorescence image is collected by the peripherally located CCD detector that has a 490-625 nm band pass filter for blocking the excitation light. Normal mucosa emits bright autofluorescence, thus the composite color appears as bright green. Because the increased vasculature in neoplastic mucosa absorbs autofluorescence, it appears with decreased intensity.
[0078] This medical endoscope can be used to collect images after reagent administration and incubation from colon with 1) white light, 2) narrow band, and fluorescence. After entering the colon, a 5 second video is collected and digitized in the white light and narrow band imaging modes. The imaging in this mode is used to assess the spatial extent of the intestinal metaplasia for comprehensive evaluation of polypeptide binding. Then, approximately 3 ml of the fluorescence-labeled peptide is administered topically at a concentration of 10 μM to the colon using a mist spray catheter being careful to cover the full extent of the mucosa. Amounts of reagent of the invention can be determined by one of ordinary skill in the art.
[0079] In some embodiments where the detectable label is a radiolabel, the radiolabel is detected by nuclear imaging. Nuclear imaging is understood in the art to be a method of producing images by detecting radiation from different parts of the body after a radioactive tracer material is administered. The images are recorded on computer and on film.
[0080] Other methods according to the disclosure involve the acquisition of a tissue sample from a patient. The tissue sample is selected from the group consisting of a tissue or organ of said patient.
Formulations
[0081] In various aspects, compositions of the invention are formulated with pharmaceutically acceptable excipients such as carriers, solvents, stabilizers, adjuvants, diluents, and the like, depending upon the particular mode of administration and dosage form. The compositions are generally formulated to achieve a physiologically compatible pH, and range from a pH of about 3 to a pH of about 11, or about pH 3 to about pH 7, depending on the formulation and route of administration. In alternative embodiments, the pH is adjusted to a range from about pH 5.0 to about pH 8. In various aspects, the compositions comprise a therapeutically effective amount of at least one compound as described herein, together with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients. Optionally, the compositions comprise a combination of the compounds described herein, or may include a second active ingredient useful in the treatment or prevention of bacterial growth (for example and without limitation, anti-bacterial or anti-microbial agents), or may include a combination of reagents according to the disclosure.
[0082] Suitable excipients include, for example, carrier molecules that include large, slowly metabolized macromolecules such as proteins, polysaccharides, polylactic acids, polyglycolic acids, polymeric amino acids, amino acid copolymers, and inactive virus particles. Other exemplary excipients include antioxidants (for example and without limitation, ascorbic acid), chelating agents (for example and without limitation, EDTA), carbohydrates (for example and without limitation, dextrin, hydroxyalkylcellulose, and hydroxyalkylmethylcellulose), stearic acid, liquids (for example and without limitation, oils, water, saline, glycerol and ethanol) wetting or emulsifying agents, pH buffering substances, and the like.
[0083] The following examples are presented by way of illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the subject matter disclosed herein.
EXAMPLES
Example 1
Cells Lines, Culture Media and Chemicals
[0084] Human CRC cell lines HT29, SW480, CCD841 and mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line NIH 3T3 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, Va.). The S114 cell line comprised NIH 3T3 cells transformed with human HGF/SF and Met and expressed cMet. We used McCoy's 5A Medium (Gibco) for culturing HT29 cells and Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (Gibco) was used to culture SW480, NIH3T3 and S114 cells. Eagle's Minimum Essential Medium (Lonza) was used for CCD841 cells. All cells were cultured at 37° C. in 5% CO.sub.2, and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The cells were passaged using 0.25% trypsin containing EDTA (Mediatech, Manassas, Va.). Cell numbers were quantitated on a hemocytometer. Peptide synthesis reagents were obtained from Anaspec (Anaspec, Fremont, Calif.) or AAPPTEC (AAPPTEC, Louisville, Ky.), were of the highest grade available (>99% purity), and were used without further purification. Solvents and other chemical reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.) unless otherwise noted.
Peptide Specific for cMet
[0085] A phage display library of heptapeptides (Ph.D.-7 New England Biolabs) was used to biopanagainst the extracellular domain of purified cMet protein, i.e., cMet-ECD (10692-H08H, Sino Biological Inc.).sup.32. Candidate phages with the highest enrichment were selected for further evaluation. Reactivity to HT29 cells was assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Binding interactions between the candidate peptides and cMet were assessed with non-intact structures 1UX3 and 2UZX using Pepsite software.sup.55. Using the above protocol, the phage containing the QQTNWSL (SEQ ID NO:1) (QQT*) peptide was enriched after 4 rounds of biopanning. A random scrambled sequence, i.e., TLQWNQS (SEQ ID NO:3) (TLQ*), was used as a control. Peptides were synthesized using standard Fmoc-mediated solid-phase chemistry.sup.33, labeled the C-terminus of peptides with NIR dye Cy5.5 (Lumiprobe, Hallandale Beach, Fla.) via a 5-amino-acid (GGGSK; SEQ ID NO:2) linker. Synthesis of both peptides was performed with a PS3 automatic synthesizer (Protein Technologies Inc., Tucson, Ariz.). Fmoc- and Boc-protected L-amino acids were used and synthesis was assembled on rink amide MBHA resin. The C-terminal lysine was incorporated as Fmoc-Lys (ivDde) —OH, and the N-terminal amino acid was incorporated with Boc protection to avoid unwanted Fmoc removal during deprotection of the ivDde moiety prior to fluorophore labeling. Upon completion of synthesis, the ivDde side chain protecting group was removed with 5% hydrazine in DMF (3×10 min) with continuous agitation at room temperature (RT), and then the resin was transferred to a reaction vessel for manual labeling with dye. The resin was washed with DMF and DCM for 3×1 min. The protected resin-bound peptide was incubated overnight with the Cy5.5-NHS ester in the presence of DIEA and incubated for 24-48 hours with agitation at RT, and the completion of the reaction was monitored by a qualitative Ninhydrin test. The peptide was then cleaved from the resin with chilled trifluoroacetic acid (TFA):triisopropylisilane:water (9.5:0.25:0.25, vol/vol/vol) for 4 hours with agitation in the dark at RT. After separating the peptide from the resin, the filtrate was evaporated with N.sub.2 gas followed by precipitation with chilled diethyl ether in an overnight incubation at −20° C. The precipitate was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min and washed with diethyl ether 3 times. The crude peptides were suspended in 1:1 acetonitrile:H.sub.2O (v/v) and purified via high-performance liquid chromatography (Waters, Milford, Mass.) with a C18 column using a water (0.1% TFA)-acetonitrile (0.1% TFA) gradient. The final purity of the peptides was confirmed by analytical C18-column. Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF, Bruker AutoFlex Speed) was used to measure the mass-to-charge (m/z) ratios of the products.
Spectral Measurements
[0086] The absorbance spectra of peptides were measured using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Scientific), and the fluorescence emission was collected with a fiber-coupled spectrophotometer (Ocean Optics) using a diode-pumped solid state laser (Technica Laser Inc.) with excitation at λex=671 nm. The spectra were plotted with Origin 6.1 software (OriginLab Corp).
Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy
[0087] HT29, SW480, S114 and NIH3T3 cells were inoculated in 12-well cell culture plates with circle glass coverslips to about 80% confluence. The cells were blocked with 1×PBS plus 2% BSA for 1 hour at 4° C., then were incubated with 5 μM peptides for 10 min at RT in the dark, washed thrice, and fixed with 4% PFA for 5 min, washed with 1×PBS, then mounted on glass slides with ProLong Gold reagent containing DAPI (Invitrogen, Waltham, Mass.). As positive control, after blocking with 2% BSA for 1 hour at 4° C., A 1:3000 dilution of primary monoclonal rabbit anti-cMet antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, #8198) was incubated with cells overnight at 4° C. Afterward, the cells were washed thrice with 1×PBS and further incubated with a 1:500 dilution of AF488-labeled secondary goat ant-rabbit immunoglobulin G antibody (Life Technologies, #A-11029) for 1 hour at RT, washed thrice, and then mounted on glass slides with ProLong Gold reagent containing DAPI. Confocal fluorescence images were collected using a 63× oil-immersion objective (Leica SP5 Inverted 2-Photon FLIM Confocal). Fluorescence intensities from five cells in two independent images were quantified using custom Matlab (Mathworks) software.
Downregulation of cMet with siRNA
[0088] We knocked down cMet protein levels with siRNAs and then evaluated the binding of QQT*-Cy5.5 and TLQ*-Cy5.5 to the surface of si-cMet-transfected HT29 cells to validate specific peptide binding. We used siRNA1 (SASI_Hs01_00133002, Sigma) for HT29, siRNA2 (SASI_WI_00000001, Sigma) for S114, and MISSION® siRNA #1 Universal Negative Control (SIC001, Sigma) for a negative control. We transfected cells with Lipofectamine 2000 (11668027, Invitrogen) per manufacturer instructions. Knockdown of cMet was confirmed by Western blot (
Competition for Peptide Binding
[0089] We used a competition assay between labeled QQT*-Cy5.5 and either unlabeled QQT* or recombinant human hepatocyte growth factor (HGF, 194-HG-005, R&D) to validate the specific binding of QQT**-Cy5.5 to HT29 cells. Approximately 10.sup.3 HT29 cells were grown to about 70% confluence on coverslips in triplicate. Unlabeled QQT* and either TLQ* peptide at 0, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 μM, or HGF at 0, 5, 10, 25, 50 or 100 ng/mL, were first added and incubated with the cells for 30 min (i.e., minutes) at 4° C. The cells were washed with 1×PBS three times and then incubated with 5 μM QQT*-Cy5.5 for another 30 min at 4° C. The cells were washed three times with 1×PBS and then fixed with 4% PFA for 10 min. The cells were washed with 1×PBS and mounted with ProLong Gold reagent containing DAPI (Invitrogen). Confocal fluorescence images were collected at each concentration using a 63× objective (Leica SP5 Inverted 2-Photon FLIM Confocal), and intensities from five cells in three independent images were quantified using custom Matlab (Mathworks, Natick, Mass.) software.
Effect of Peptide on Cell Signaling
[0090] HT29 cells were treated with serum-free medium overnight for starvation before incubation with hHGF (hHGF, 294-HG-005, R&D) or peptides. Recombinant Human HGF Protein was added to HT29 cells at concentrations of 25 ng/ml for 10, 30, or 120 min in separate wells. QQT*-Cy5.5 and TLQ*-Cy5.5 were added at concentrations of 5 or 100 μM for 10, 30, and 120 min. Peptides were added at concentrations of 5 and 100 μM for 10, 30, or 120 min. Cells were then washed with 1×PBS and lysed with Pierce RIPA buffer containing Halt Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (Thermo Fisher) and Halt Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Thermo Fisher). Protein contents were quantified by Bicinchoninic Acid Assay (BCA). Anti-cMet antibody (Cell Signaling, #8198), phospho-cMet (Tyr1234/1235) antibody (Cell Signaling, #3077), anti-AKT antibody (Cell Signaling, #4691), anti-phospho-AKT antibody (Cell Signaling, #9271), anti-ERK1/2 antibody (Abcam, #ab17942), anti-phospho-ERK1/2 antibody (Abcam, #ab50011), and anti-tubulin antibody (Invitrogen, #32-2600) were used per manufacturer's instructions.
[0091] An alamar blue assay was performed using HT29 and CCD841 cells. After culturing in serum free media overnight, about 3×10.sup.3 cells were seeded per well in serum free media in 96 well plates at a final volume of 100 μL per well. The cells were incubated with either HGF (25 ng/mL) or peptide (5 and 10 μM) at 37° C. for 48 hours. Alamar blue reagent (10 μL) was added in amounts equal to 10% of the volume in the well, and incubated at 37° C. for 4 hours. Fluorescence with excitation at λex=530-560 nm, and emission at λex=590 nm, was measured.
Characterization of Peptide Binding
[0092] We assessed the binding affinity of QQT*-Cy5.5 to HT29 cells by measuring the apparent dissociation constant. HT29 cells were blocked with 0.5% BSA, and then approximately 10.sup.5 cells were incubated with QQT*-Cy5.5 at concentrations of 0, 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, or 200 nmol/L for 1 hour at 4° C. Cells then were washed 3 times with 1×PBS containing 0.5% BSA to remove unbound peptides before analysis with flow cytometry (FACS Canto; BD Biosciences, San Jose, Calif.). Sample means were used to calculate the equilibrium dissociation constant K.sub.D using nonlinear regression analysis with Origin 6.1 data analysis software (OriginLab, Northampton, Mass.). K.sub.D=1/K.sub.A was calculated by performing a least-squares fit of the data to the nonlinear equation I[X]=(I.sub.0+I.sub.maxk.sub.a[X])/(I.sub.0+k.sub.a[X]). I.sub.0 and I.sub.max are the initial and maximum fluorescence intensities, corresponding to no peptide and peptide saturation, respectively, and [X] represents the concentration of the bound peptide..sup.34
[0093] The time scale of QQT*-Cy5.5 binding to HT29 cells was assessed by measuring the apparent association time constant k. HT29 cells were blocked with 0.5% BSA, and then approximately 10.sup.5 cells were incubated with 5 μM QQT*-Cy5.5 for time intervals ranging from 0 to 20 min at 4° C. Cells then were washed 3 times with cold 1× PBS containing 0.5% BSA to remove unbound peptides. After centrifugation, the cells were fixed with 4% PFA for 30 min at 4° C. before analysis with flow cytometry. The median fluorescence intensity (y) at the various time points (t) was taken as a ratio with that of HT29 cells without the addition of peptide using the Flowjo software (LLC, Ashland, Oreg.). The rate constant k was calculated by fitting the data to a first-order kinetics model y (t)=I.sub.max [1−exp(−kt)] where I.sub.max is the maximum value, using the Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad, La Jolla, Calif.).
[0094] Interactions between peptide and mouse cMet were evaluated using a pull-down assay (Paul et al., Methods 54:387-395 (2011)). Peptides were immobilized on EHS active beads (17-0906-01, GE), and incubated with purified mouse cMet-ECD protein (50622-M08H, Sino Biological). After washing, bound proteins were detected by Western blot (
Organoid Specimens
[0095] The information about patient specimens are listed in Table 1. The normal specimen (#87) in this study was derived from the tissue of a deceased donor; while the adenoma organoids were derived from biopsied large adenoma: #245 (sessile serrated); #590 (tubular); #584 (tubular 20 mm); and #236 (FAP).
[0096] To authenticate specimens, short tandem repeat (STR) analysis was employed to identify human genomic DNA for 15 tetranucleotide repeat loci (AMPFLSTR Identifier Plus Assay, Applied Biosystems; University of Michigan DNA Sequencing Core), in addition, the amelogenin gender determination marker was run on the 3730XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Cultures were frequently tested for mycoplasma contamination with the Lonza MycoAlert Kit (service of the UMICH Transgenic Animal Model Core).
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Patient-derived colon normal and adenoma organoids. A targeted colorectal cancer DNA sequencing panel was used to determine the presence of variants for 71 different oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes often mutated in colorectal cancers. Stop codon (*); frame shift (FS). Sex & Neoplasm ID Age Location Variations Normal colon 87 M (ages 21); ascending Adenoma: 245 F 54 ascending BRAF Val600Glu, WBSCR17 Ser432Ser Sessile serrated (20 mm) Adenoma 590 F 58 ascending BUB1B Arg550*, FLCN His429fs, MLH1 (35 mm) Lys443fs, MSH3 Lys381fs, PALB2 Met296fs, TCERG1 Arg889fs, CTNNA1 Met826Thr, CTNNB1 Ser45Phe, MAP2K4 Val127Ala, MLH3 Pro564Ser, PIK3R1 Arg188Cys Adenoma: 236 F 26 ascending APC Thr1556fs, APC Leu143fs, MLH3 E624Q FAP (2 mm) Adenoma 584 M 61 ascending APC Thr1556fs, KRAS Ala146Val, MET (20 mm) Arg988Cys, PMS2 Gly29Ala, TP53 Arg267Trp, EP300 Asp1579Asn
Organoid Culture
[0097] Human organoid cultures were previously established from normal and adenomatous tissues.sup.36-38 and provided by the Translational Tissue Modeling Laboratory (TTML; University of Michigan).
[0098] Cultures were grown in Matrigel (diluted to 8 mg/mL with growth media; Corning, #354234) in 6-well tissue culture plates (USA Scientific CytoOne, #CC7682-7506). Cultures were passaged by triturating and dissociating the Matrigel in cold Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS), centrifuging at 300×g, and plating the first day with 2.5 μM CHIR99021 (Tocris; 4423), a highly selective GSK3 inhibitor, and 10 μM Y27632 (Tocris; TB1254-GMP/10), a highly selective p160ROCK inhibitor.
[0099] The normal (#87) and sessile serrated (#245) organoids were cultured in LWRN Complete medium containing 50% L-WRN conditioned medium (source of Wnt3a, R-spondin-3 and Noggin).sup.39, advanced DMEM/F-12 (Gibco, 12634028), N-2 media supplement (Gibco; Ser. No. 17/502,048), B-27 supplement minus vitamin A (Gibco; Ser. No. 12/587,010), 1 mM N-Acetyl-L-cysteine (Sigma-Aldrich, A9165), 2 mM GlutaMax (Gibco, #35050-061), 10 mM HEPES (Gibco, #15630080), 50 units/mL penicillin, 0.05 mg/mL streptomycin (Gibco, #15070063), 50 μg/ml Primocin (InvivoGen; ##ant-pm-1), 100 ng EGF/mL (R&D Systems, Inc., 236-EG), 10 μM SB202190 (Sigma-Aldrich; S7067), 500 nM A83-01 (R&D Tocris, #2939), and 10 μM Y27632 (Tocris; TB1254-GMP/10). The FAP adenoma (#236) was cultured in LWRN Complete medium without SB 202190.
[0100] The tubular adenoma organoid (#590) was cultured in Stemline Complete medium, containing Stemline™ Keratinocyte Medium II (Sigma 50196) and supplemented with Stemline Growth Supplement (Sigma S9945), 2 mM GlutaMax, 4 mM L-glutamine, and 50 μg/ml Primocin. Prior to harvest for transplantation, the #590 cultures were treated with 5 μM Y27632 for 18 hours. The tubular adenoma organoid #584 was cultured in 50% of the above Stemline complete medium and 50% of the above LWRN complete medium.
[0101] Cultures were harvested from Matrigel in cold DPBS, triturated 30× with a 1 mL pipette tip, and centrifuged at 300×g for 3 min at 4° C. The organoid pellet was resuspended in 10 mL cold DPBS and mechanically disassociated with the gentle MACS Octo Dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec; 130-096-427) using the programs h_Tumor_01.01 followed by m_Lung-01.01. The organoid fragments were further dissociated by 20× pipetting with a 1 mL pipette tip. Large fragments were removed over a 100 μm BSA-coated cell strainer (Corning, DL 352360). A slow centrifugation at 100×g was done to reduce single cell content. The cell aggregates were resuspended in cold DPBS supplemented with 5% Matrigel and 10 μM Y27632. All plasticware, including gentle MACS C-tubes (Miltenyi; 130-093-237), were treated with 0.1% BSA in DPBS to reduce adherence of organoids.
Organoid Transplant
[0102] Acute colitis was induced in 8-week-old NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ mice (005557, The Jackson Laboratory).sup.40,41 by feeding them with 3.0% DSS (molecular weight 40,000; Cat #AAJ6360622; Alfa Aesar) dissolved in drinking water for 5 days (d). At 6 d, the donor organoids were released from the type I collagen gel, dissociated by EDTA, and washed with BSA-containing PBS as with the passage procedure. Approximately 2.5-5E5 cell aggregates in 200 μL were transplanted per mouse as previously described.sup.42,43. Organoids were instilled into colonic lumen as a suspension by using a syringe and a thin flexible catheter 4 cm in length and 2 mm in diameter. The anal verge was glued for 6 hours after infusion to prevent luminal contents from being excreted immediately, then glue were removed by Ethanol. Mice were maintained as usual after the transplantation. The mice were housed in pathogen-free conditions and supplied water ad libitum under controlled conditions of humidity (50±10%), light (12/12 hour light/dark cycle) and temperature (25° C.). Anesthesia was induced and maintained via a nose cone with inhaled isoflurane mixed with oxygen at a concentration of 2-4% at a flow rate of about 0.5 L/min. Organoid imaging was performed 3 weeks after transplantation.
CPC;Apc Mouse Model
[0103] A CPC;Apc mouse model that can develop spontaneous adenomas in distal colon epithelium.sup.44 was also used. Under the control of the Cdx2 promoter (CDX2P-9.5NLS-Cre), Cre recombinase can sporadically delete the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) allele, resulting in polyploid colonic adenomas or flat lesions. We collected images from mice (n=8) that ranged in age from 7 to 10 months.
In Vivo Imaging with Peptide
[0104] In vivo imaging was performed with approval of the University of Michigan Committee on the Use and Care of Animals. CPC;Apc mice were used for in vivo imaging. This mouse line was genetically engineered to sporadically delete an adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) allele under control of a Cdx2 promoter (CDX2P-9.5NLS-Cre) to spontaneously form either flat or polyploid adenomas in the distal colon (Hinoi et al., Cancer Res 67:9721-9730 (2007)). Mice were housed in pathogen-free conditions and supplied water ad libitum under controlled conditions of humidity (50±10%), light (12/12 hour light/dark cycle) and temperature (25° C.). Prior to imaging, the mice were fasted for 4-6 hours. Anesthesia was induced and maintained via a nose cone with inhaled isoflurane mixed with oxygen at a concentration of 2-4% at a flow rate of 0.5 L/min.
[0105] A rigid small animal endoscope (Karl Sorz Veterinary Endoscopy) was inserted into the rectum (Liu et al., Gut 62:395-403 (2013)) and used to image the distal colon.sup.45. Mucus and debris in the distal colon were removed by vigorously rinsing with warm tap water 3×. White-light illumination was applied first to identify the presence of adenomas. The distance between the endoscope tip and the anus, and the clockwise location of polyps, were recorded. QQT*-Cy5.5 solution (100 μM, 1.5 mL) was topically delivered into the distal colon through the instrument channel (3 Fr). After 5 min for incubation, unbound peptides, stool and debris were rinsed away with warm tap water 3× prior to image collection. After 3 days, clearance of the signal from QQT*-Cy5.5 was confirmed endoscopically, and then the same mice were imaged using TLQ*-Cy5.5 for control. A ratio of the fluorescence and reflectance images was determined to correct for differences in distance and geometry over the image field-of-view (FOV) (Joshi et al., Endoscopy 48:A1-A13 (2016)). A total of 3 independent regions with dimensions of 20×20 μm.sup.2 were identified randomly from the location of the adenoma (target) and from adjacent normal colonic mucosa (background).
[0106] The mean fluorescence intensity was used to calculate the target-to-background (T/B) ratios. Images were processed and analyzed using custom software in Matlab (Mathworks) (Joshi et al., Gastroenterology 152:1002-1013 e1009 (2017)). Matlab software was used to quantify the fluorescence intensity. The fluorescence intensity of regions of interest (ROI) was corrected by taking the ratio of fluorescence to reflectance, the fluorescence of interested region was taken as target (T), and adjacent mouse normal colon region with equal area was picked for use as background (B).sup.46. Streams that showed minimum motion artifact and absence of debris (stool, mucus) were selected for image quantification. Individual frames were exported using the custom Matlab software.
Ex Vivo Validation of High Expression of cMet in Mouse Colonic Neoplasia
[0107] After imaging was completed, the mice were euthanized. The colon was resected and divided longitudinally, the colon was excised, flushed with PBS, and opened longitudinally for imaging with the NIR fluorescence imaging system (Pearl®, LI-COR Biosciences). Images were collected with 85 m resolution using λex=685 nm and λem=720 nm. Images were analyzed with custom software (Image Studio, Li-Cor Biosciences). The normal colon region with an equal area adjacent to the polyps was used to measure background. Prism software (v6.02, GraphPad) was used to plot data.
Increased cMet Expression in CPC;Apc Mouse Colonic Adenoma and Human Proximal Colonic Neoplasia with IHC
[0108] Serial formalin-fixed sections were prepared with 10 m thickness, deparaffinized, and antigen retrieval accomplished using standard methods. Briefly, sections were incubated in xylene for 3 min 3 times, washed with 100% ethanol for 2 min 2 times, and washed with 95% ethanol for 2 min 2 times. Sections were incubated in dH.sub.2O for 5 min 2 times for rehydration. Antigen unmasking was performed in boiled 10 mM 1× pH6.0 citric acid buffer for 10 min. After cooling at room temperature (RT) for 20-30 min, the sections were washed in dH.sub.2O for 2 min 3 times. The sections were incubated in 3% H.sub.2O.sub.2 for 10 min to block endogenous peroxidase activity. The sections were washed in dH.sub.2O for 5 min three times and in phosphate-buffered saline with Tween 20 (PBST) for 5 min. Blocking was performed with 10% normal goat serum or DAKO protein blocking agent (X0909, DAKO) for 45 min at RT. The sections were incubated overnight with 1:100 dilution of monoclonal rabbit anti-cMet antibody (Abcam, EP1454Y, ab51067) containing 2.5% normal goat serum at 4° C. and washed in 0.1% TBST for 5 min 3 times. A 1:200 dilution of secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody (Abcam, ab150077) was applied to each section and incubated for 30 min at RT. Controls were prepared using the same method but without addition of the primary anti-cMet antibody. Secondary antibody was removed by washing in 0.1% TBST for 5 min 3 times. Sections were then incubated in premixed Elite Vectastain ABC reagent (Vector Labs, PK-6100) for 30 min at RT. The sections were washed in 0.1% TBST for 5 min 3 times and developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine substrate. The reaction was monitored for 1-3 min, and then quenched by immersing the slides in dH.sub.2O as soon as the sections developed. Hematoxylin was added as a counterstain for about 20 seconds, and the sections were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethyl alcohol (70%, 80%, 95%, 95%, 100%, 100%). Coverslips were attached using Permount™ mounting medium (Fisher, Pittsburgh, Pa., #SP15-100) in xylene. Serial sections were processed for histology (H&E). Controls were prepared using same method without primary anti-cMet antibody. Serial sections were processed for routine histology (H&E).
Immunofluorescence Staining of cMet with QQT*-Cy5.5/Antibody in CPC;Apc Mouse Colonic Adenoma and Human Proximal Colonic Neoplasia
[0109] Specimens of mouse colonic adenoma were harvested, formalin-fixed, and paraffin-embedded. Specimens of tubular adenomas (n=21), sessile serrated adenomas (n=13), hyperplastic polyps (n=7), and normal colonic mucosa (n=10) from human proximal colon were obtained from the archived tissue bank in the University of Michigan Department of Pathology. Human specimens were treated as same as mouse colonic specimens. Sections (5-mm thick) were cut and mounted onto glass slides (Superfrost Plus; Fischer Scientific). Serial 5 m sections were deparaffinized, and antigen retrieval was performed as described above. The sections were blocked with 10% goat normal serum (Fisher Scientific, 50062Z) for 10 min at RT followed by rinsing with PBS. Sections were incubated with 5 μM QQT*-Cy5.5 with 2% BSA for 10 min at RT. The sections were then washed 3 times with 0.1% PBST and further incubated with a 1:200 dilution of anti-cMet primary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, #8198) with 2% BSA for 2 hours at RT in the dark. Sections were washed 3 times with 0.1% PBST for 3 min each, and then incubated with 1:500 AF488-labeled goat anti rabbit secondary antibody (Abcam, ab150077) with 2% BSA for 1 hour at RT in the dark. After washing 3 times with 0.1% PBST for 3 min each, the sections were mounted with Prolong Gold reagent containing DAPI (Invitrogen). Adjacent sections were processed for histology (H&E). We placed 3 boxes with dimensions of 20×20 μm.sup.2 completely within colonic epithelium in each image, and measured the mean fluorescence intensities using custom Matlab software. Regions of saturated intensities were avoided.
Example 2
[0110] Peptide Specific for cMet
[0111] The linear, heptapeptide sequence QQTNWSL (SEQ ID NO:1) was identified by biopanning a high diversity phage display library of linearized heptapeptides against the extra-cellular domain (ECD) of cMet. The peptide showed the lowest P-value for binding interactions using a structural model for cMet. The C-terminus of this peptide (black) is covalently linked with the fluorophore Cy5.5 (red) via a GGGSK linker (blue), hereafter QQT*-Cy5.5,
Example 3
[0112] Validation of Binding with Cells In Vitro
[0113] siRNA knockdown experiments were performed using HT29 human colorectal cancer cells to validate specific binding of QQT*-Cy5.5 to cMet. On confocal microscopy, QQT*-Cy5.5 (red) and AF488-labeled anti-cMet antibody (green) bind strongly to the surface (arrows) of control HT29 cells transfected with siCL (control),
Example 4
Peptide Characterization
[0114] Specific binding of QQT*-Cy5.5 to cMet was confirmed by adding unlabeled QQT* to compete for binding. Fluorescence intensities were observed to decrease significantly in a concentration dependent manner,
Example 5
Effect of Peptide on Cell Signaling
[0115] Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is a known ligand for cMet, and was incubated with HT29 cells (cMet+) as a positive control. Strong phosphorylation activity was observed for cMet (p-cMet), downstream AKT (p-AKT), and ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2) on Western blot,
[0116] More particularly, no competition was observed between QQT* and HGF, supporting a lack of interaction and effect on downstream signaling,
Example 6
In Vivo Imaging of Genetically Engineered CRC Mice
[0117] The results of a pull-down assay supported specific binding of QQT*-Cy5.5 to mouse cMet-ECD,
Example 7
Macroscopic Validation in Mouse Colon Ex Vivo
[0118] After imaging was completed, the CPC;Apc mice were euthanized, and the colon was excised and divided longitudinally to expose the mucosal surface for collection of macroscopic white light and fluorescence images,
[0119] This ex vivo imaging validated the specific binding by QQT*-Cy5.5 to cMet. The colon was excised and divided longitudinally to expose the mucosal surface. Co-localization at the polyps was seen on the merged image,
Example 8
Microscopic Validation in Mouse Colon Ex Vivo
[0120] Increased fluorescence staining of QQT*-Cy5.5 and anti-cMet-AF488 on the surface of dysplastic colonocytes (arrow) was observed in sections of CPC;Apc mouse colon using confocal microscopy,
Example 9
In Vivo Imaging of Patient-Derived Colonic Organoids
[0121] A white light image collected with a small animal endoscope showed the presence of two human normal (arrow,
[0122] To investigate whether QQT*-Cy5.5 also bound to SSA, we generated an SSA transplanted mouse model using the same method. White light of normal and SSA organoids are shown in
Example 10
[0123] Validation of cMet Expression in Human Colon
[0124] Staining of human colon with QQT*-Cy5.5 and anti-cMet-AF488 was evaluated in n=42 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens of human colon, including tubular adenoma, sessile serrated adenoma (SSA), hyperplastic polyp (HP), and normal mucosa. Merged fluorescence images are shown for representative sections of adenoma, SSA, hyperplastic polyp (HP), and normal colonic mucosa, collected with confocal microscopy,
REFERENCES
[0125] 1. Favoriti, P., et al. Worldwide burden of colorectal cancer: a review. Updates Surg 68, 7-11(2016). [0126] 2. Torre, L. A., et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65, 87-108 (2015). [0127] 3. Ferlay, J., et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127, 2893-2917 (2010). [0128] 4. Ferlay, J., et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136, E359-386 (2015). [0129] 5. Brown, S. C., Abraham, J. S., Walsh, S. & Sykes, P. A. Risk factors and operative mortality in surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 73, 269-272 (1991). [0130] 6. Carraro, P. G., Segala, M., Cesana, B. M. & Tiberio, G. Obstructing colonic cancer: failure and survival patterns over a ten-year follow-up after one-stage curative surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44, 243-250 (2001). [0131] 7. Winawer, S. J., et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329, 1977-1981 (1993). [0132] 8. Winawer, S. J., et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 328, 901-906 (1993). [0133] 9. Heresbach, D., et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 40, 284-290 (2008). [0134] 10. Soetikno, R. M., et al. Prevalence of nonpolyploid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. Jama 299, 1027-1035 (2008). [0135] 11. van Rijn, J. C., et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101, 343-350 (2006). [0136] 12. Clapper, M. L., et al. Detection of colorectal adenomas using a bioactivatable probe specific for matrix metalloproteinase activity. Neoplasia 13, 685-691 (2011). [0137] 13. Marten, K., et al. Detection of dysplastic intestinal adenomas using enzyme-sensing molecular beacons in mice. Gastroenterology 122, 406-414 (2002). [0138] 14. Naran, S., Zhang, X. & Hughes, S. J. Inhibition of HGF/MET as therapy for malignancy. [0139] Expert Opin Ther Targets 13, 569-581 (2009). [0140] 15. Sattler, M. & Salgia, R. cMet and hepatocyte growth factor: potential as novel targets in cancer therapy. Curr Oncol Rep 9, 102-108 (2007). [0141] 16. Uehara, Y., et al. Placental defect and embryonic lethality in mice lacking hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor. Nature 373, 702-705 (1995). [0142] 17. Christensen, J. G., Burrows, J. & Salgia, R. cMet as a target for human cancer and characterization of inhibitors for therapeutic intervention. Cancer Lett 225, 1-26 (2005). [0143] 18. Birchmeier, C., Birchmeier, W., Gherardi, E. & Vande Woude, G. F. Met, metastasis, motility and more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4, 915-925 (2003). [0144] 19. Maulik, G., et al. Role of the hepatocyte growth factor receptor, cMet, in oncogenesis and potential for therapeutic inhibition. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 13, 41-59 (2002). [0145] 20. Di Renzo, M. F., et al. Overexpression and amplification of the met/HGF receptor gene during the progression of colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1, 147-154 (1995). [0146] 21. Fearon, E. R. & Vogelstein, B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell 61, 759-767 (1990). [0147] 22. Lu, R. M., Chang, Y. L., Chen, M. S. & Wu, H. C. Single chain anti-cMet antibody conjugated nanoparticles for in vivo tumor-targeted imaging and drug delivery. Biomaterials 32, 3265-3274 (2011). [0148] 23. Towner, R. A., et al. In vivo detection of cMet expression in a rat C6 glioma model. J Cell Mol Med 12, 174-186 (2008). [0149] 24. Joshi, B. P., et al. Design and Synthesis of Near-Infrared Peptide for in Vivo Molecular Imaging of HER2. Bioconjug Chem 27, 481-494 (2016). [0150] 25. Zhou, J., et al. EGFR Overexpressed in Colonic Neoplasia Can be Detected on Wide-Field Endoscopic Imaging. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 6, e101 (2015). [0151] 26. Burggraaf, J., et al. Detection of colorectal polyps in humans using an intravenously administered fluorescent peptide targeted against cMet. Nat Med 21, 955-961 (2015). [0152] 27. Sturm, M. B., et al. Targeted imaging of esophageal neoplasia with a fluorescently labeled peptide: first-in-human results. Sci Transl Med 5, 184ra161 (2013). [0153] 28. Hsiung, P. L., et al. Detection of colonic dysplasia in vivo using a targeted heptapeptide and confocal microendoscopy. Nat Med 14, 454-458 (2008). [0154] 29. Lee, S., Xie, J. & Chen, X. Peptides and peptide hormones for molecular imaging and disease diagnosis. Chem Rev 110, 3087-3111 (2010). [0155] 30. Sato, T., et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 459, 262-265 (2009). [0156] 31. Sugimoto, S., et al. Reconstruction of the Human Colon Epithelium In Vivo. Cell Stem Cell 22, 171-176 e175 (2018). [0157] 32. Li, M., et al. Affinity peptide for targeted detection of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 139, 1472-1480 (2010). [0158] 33. Fields, G. B. & Noble, R. L. Solid phase peptide synthesis utilizing 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl amino acids. Int J Pept Protein Res 35, 161-214 (1990). [0159] 34. Thomas, R., et al. In vitro binding evaluation of 177Lu-AMBA, a novel 177Lu-labeled GRP-R agonist for systemic radiotherapy in human tissues. Clin Exp Metastasis 26, 105-119 (2009). [0160] 35. Joshi, B. P., Liu, Z., Elahi, S. F., Appelman, H. D. & Wang, T. D. Near-infrared-labeled peptide multimer functions as phage mimic for high affinity, specific targeting of colonic adenomas in vivo (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 76, 1197-1206 e1191-1195 (2012). [0161] 36. Dame, M. K., et al. Identification, isolation and characterization of human LGR5-positive colon adenoma cells. Development 145(2018). [0162] 37. Sato, T., et al. Long-term expansion of epithelial organoids from human colon, adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and Barrett's epithelium. Gastroenterology 141, 1762-1772 (2011). [0163] 38. Tsai, Y. H., et al. A Method for Cryogenic Preservation of Human Biopsy Specimens and Subsequent Organoid Culture. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 6, 218-222 e217 (2018). [0164] 39. Miyoshi, H. & Stappenbeck, T. S. In vitro expansion and genetic modification of gastrointestinal stem cells in spheroid culture. Nat Protoc 8, 2471-2482 (2013). [0165] 40. Shultz, L. D., et al. Human lymphoid and myeloid cell development in NOD/LtSz-scid IL2R gamma null mice engrafted with mobilized human hemopoietic stem cells. J Immunol 174, 6477-6489 (2005). [0166] 41. Ishikawa, F., et al. Development of functional human blood and immune systems in NOD/SCID/IL2 receptor {gamma} chain(null) mice. Blood 106, 1565-1573 (2005). [0167] 42. Yui, S., et al. Functional engraftment of colon epithelium expanded in vitro from a single adult Lgr5(+) stem cell. Nat Med 18, 618-623 (2012). [0168] 43. Xue, X., et al. Iron Uptake via DMT1 Integrates Cell Cycle with JAK-STAT3 Signaling to Promote Colorectal Tumorigenesis. Cell Metab 24, 447-461 (2016). [0169] 44. Hinoi, T., et al. Mouse model of colonic adenoma-carcinoma progression based on somatic Apc inactivation. Cancer Res 67, 9721-9730 (2007). [0170] 45. Liu, Z., Miller, S. J., Joshi, B. P. & Wang, T. D. In vivo targeting of colonic dysplasia on fluorescence endoscopy with near-infrared octapeptide. Gut 62, 395-403 (2013). [0171] 46. Joshi, B. P., et al. Detection of Sessile Serrated Adenomas in the Proximal Colon Using Wide-Field Fluorescence Endoscopy. Gastroenterology 152, 1002-1013 e1009 (2017). [0172] 47. Rex, D. K. Reducing costs of colon polyp management. Lancet Oncol 10, 1135-1136 (2009). [0173] 48. Hay, R. V., et al. Nuclear imaging of Met-expressing human and canine cancer xenografts with radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies (MetSeek). Clin Cancer Res 11, 7064s-7069s (2005). [0174] 49. Jagoda, E. M., et al. Immuno-PET of the hepatocyte growth factor receptor Met using the 1-armed antibody onartuzumab. J Nucl Med 53, 1592-1600 (2012). [0175] 50. Chen, K. & Chen, X. Design and development of molecular imaging probes. Curr Top Med Chem 10, 1227-1236 (2010). [0176] 51. Song, E. K., et al. Potent antitumor activity of cabozantinib, a cMet and VEGFR2 inhibitor, in a colorectal cancer patient-derived tumor explant model. Int J Cancer 136, 1967-1975 (2015). [0177] 52. Matsumura, A., et al. HGF regulates VEGF expression via the cMet receptor downstream pathways, PI3K/Akt, MAPK and STAT3, in CT26 murine cells. Int J Oncol 42, 535-542 (2013). [0178] 53. Bardelli, A., et al. Amplification of the MET receptor drives resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer. Cancer Discov 3, 658-673 (2013). [0179] 54. Boccaccio, C., Luraghi, P. & Comoglio, P. M. MET-mediated resistance to EGFR inhibitors: an old liaison rooted in colorectal cancer stem cells. Cancer Res 74, 3647-3651 (2014). [0180] 55. Chen, J., et al. Multiplexed Targeting of Barrett's Neoplasia with a Heterobivalent Ligand: Imaging Study on Mouse Xenograft in Vivo and Human Specimens ex Vivo. J Med Chem 61, 5323-5331 (2018). [0181] 56. Su et al., Science 256(5057):668-670 (1992). [0182] 57. Hinoi et al., Cancer Res., 67(20): 9721-9730 (2007). [0183] 58. Alencar et al., Radiology, 244: 232-238 (2007). [0184] 59. Hung et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107: 1565-1570 (2010). [0185] 60. Li et al., Gastroenterology, 139:1472-80 (2010). [0186] 61. Hsiung et al., Nat. Med., 14: 454-458 (2008). [0187] 62. Joyce et al., Cancer Cell, 4: 393-403 (2003). [0188] 63. Essler et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99: 2252-2257 (2002). [0189] 64. Lee et al., Mol. Cancer Res., 5(1): 11-19 (2007). [0190] 65. Ludtke et al., Drug Deliv., 14: 357-369 (2007).
[0191] All publications and patents mentioned in the application are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties or in relevant part, as would be apparent from context. Various modifications and variations of the disclosed subject matter will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the disclosure. Although the disclosure has been described in connection with specific embodiments, it should be understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Various modifications of the described modes for making or using the disclosed subject matter that are obvious to those skilled in the relevant field(s) are intended to be within the scope of the following claims.