ACRYLIC COPOLYMER COAGULANT AND METHOD OF PREPARING GRAFT COPOLYMER USING THE SAME

Abstract

The present invention provides an acrylic copolymer coagulant which is a copolymer of a monomer mixture comprising a carboxylic acid-based monomer and an acrylic monomer, and a method of preparing a graft copolymer using the same. According to the present invention, a graft copolymer excellent in impact strength, surface gloss characteristics, and processability can be prepared.

Claims

1. An acrylic copolymer coagulant which is a copolymer of a monomer mixture comprising a carboxylic acid-based monomer and an acrylic monomer represented by Chemical Formula 1 below, wherein a content X of a carboxylic acid-based monomer unit in the acrylic copolymer coagulant satisfies Expression 1 below, and an average particle diameter Y of the acrylic copolymer coagulant satisfies Expression 2 below: ##STR00003## in Chemical Formula 1, n is 0 or 1,
2+(n+1).sup.2−0.5(n+1)×2+(n+1).sup.2+0.5(n+1)  <Expression 1>
{20.817×(n+1).sup.2−27.35×(n+1)+28.433}/X×10−1.5≤Y≤{20.817×(n+1).sup.2−27.35×(n+1)+28.433}/X×10+1.5  <Expression 2> in Expressions 1 and 2, n is an n value of Chemical Formula 1, X is a content of a carboxylic acid-based monomer unit comprised in the acrylic copolymer coagulant (units: wt %), and Y is an average particle diameter of the acrylic copolymer coagulant (units: nm).

2. The acrylic copolymer coagulant of claim 1, wherein the acrylic copolymer coagulant is a copolymer of a monomer mixture comprising a carboxylic acid-based monomer and methyl acrylate, and a content X of a carboxylic acid-based monomer unit in the acrylic copolymer coagulant is in a range of 2.5 wt % to 3.5 wt %.

3. The acrylic copolymer coagulant of claim 2, wherein an average particle diameter Y of the acrylic copolymer coagulant is in a range of 61.5 nm to 89.1 nm.

4. The acrylic copolymer coagulant of claim 2, wherein the acrylic copolymer coagulant has a weight-average molecular weight of 700,000 g/mol to 950,000 g/mol.

5. The acrylic copolymer coagulant of claim 1, wherein the acrylic copolymer coagulant is a copolymer of a monomer mixture comprising a carboxylic acid-based monomer and ethyl acrylate, and a content X of a carboxylic acid-based monomer unit in the acrylic copolymer coagulant is in a range of 5 wt % to 7 wt %.

6. The acrylic copolymer coagulant of claim 5, wherein an average particle diameter Y of the acrylic copolymer coagulant is in a range of 80 nm to 115.5 nm.

7. The acrylic copolymer coagulant of claim 5, wherein the acrylic copolymer coagulant has a weight-average molecular weight of 250,000 g/mol to 350,000 g/mol.

8. A method of preparing a graft copolymer, comprising: preparing a second diene-based rubber polymer by coagulation of a first diene-based rubber polymer with the acrylic copolymer coagulant according to claim 1; and preparing a graft copolymer by graft polymerization of the second diene-based rubber polymer with an aromatic vinyl-based monomer and a vinyl cyanide-based monomer.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the first diene-based rubber polymer has an average particle diameter of 90 to 110 nm, and the second diene-based rubber polymer has an average particle diameter of 250 to 350 nm.

Description

EXAMPLES AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES

[0079] <Preparation of Acrylic Copolymer Coagulant>

[0080] 100 parts by weight of a monomer mixture comprising methacrylic acid (MAA), methyl acrylate (MA), ethyl acrylate (EA), and butyl acrylate (BA) in contents shown in Tables 1 to 16 below, 0.4 parts by weight of potassium persulfate, 170 parts by weight of ion exchanged water, and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate as a first emulsifier in a content shown in Tables 1 to 16 below were uniformly mixed to prepare a polymerization solution.

[0081] 170 parts by weight of ion exchanged water and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate as a second emulsifier in a content shown in Tables 1 to 16 below were added to a nitrogen-substituted polymerization reactor, and the temperature inside the reactor was raised to 80° C. Polymerization was performed while continuously adding the polymerization solution to the reactor at a predetermined rate for 5 hours to prepare an acrylic copolymer coagulant latex.

[0082] <Preparation of Second Butadiene-Based Rubber Polymer>

[0083] 60 parts by weight (based on solid content) of a first butadiene rubber polymer latex having an average particle diameter of 103 nm was heated to 50° C. while stirring. Then, a coagulant was added in a content (based on solid content) shown in Tables 1 to 16 below, and aging was performed for 15 minutes. Afterward, 0.18 parts by weight of KOH was added, and aging was performed for 5 minutes while stirring to prepare a second butadiene rubber polymer latex.

[0084] <Preparation of Graft Copolymer>

[0085] The whole amount of the second butadiene rubber polymer latex, 3 parts by weight of styrene, 1 part by weight of acrylonitrile, and 93.9 parts by weight of ion exchanged water were added to a nitrogen-substituted reactor and then stirred. Subsequently, 0.12 parts by weight of cumene hydroperoxide and, as redox-based catalysts, 0.11 parts by weight of dextrose, 0.08 parts by weight of sodium pyrophosphate, and 0.0016 parts by weight of ferrous sulfate were batch-added. Then, the reactor was heated to 70° C. for 50 minutes. Subsequently, 27 parts by weight of styrene and 9 parts by weight of acrylonitrile were continuously added at a predetermined rate for 90 minutes, and then the reaction was terminated to prepare a graft copolymer latex.

[0086] The graft copolymer latex was subjected to coagulation with MgSO.sub.4, aging, washing, dehydration, and drying to prepare a graft copolymer powder.

[0087] <Preparation of Thermoplastic Resin Composition>

[0088] 25 parts by weight of the graft copolymer powder and 75 parts by weight of 92HR (commercially available from LG Chem Ltd., styrene/acrylonitrile copolymer) were mixed to prepare a thermoplastic resin composition.

Experimental Example 1

[0089] Properties of the acrylic copolymer coagulants of Examples and Comparative Examples were evaluated by methods described below, and results thereof are shown in Tables.

[0090] (1) Average particle diameter (nm): measured by a dynamic light scattering method using a Nicomp 380 HPL instrument (manufactured by Nicomp).

[0091] (2) Weight-average molecular weight (g/mol): measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) analysis after the acrylic copolymer coagulant latex was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (THF) at a concentration of 2 mg/ml, stirred for 12 hours, and filtered through a 45-nm polytetrafluoroethylene filter.

[0092] (3) Polymerization conversion rate (%): determined by drying 1 g of the acrylic copolymer coagulant latex in an oven set at 135° C. for 20 minutes, measuring a solid content, and dividing the measured solid content by a theoretical solid content (target TSC).

Experimental Example 2

[0093] Physical properties of the second butadiene rubber polymer latex of Examples and Comparative Examples were measured by methods described below, and results thereof are shown in Tables.

[0094] (4) Aggregation phenomenon: When the measured amount (ppm) of aggregates is 30,000 ppm or more or when phase separation was visually observed during the stirring of the second butadiene rubber polymer latex, it was determined that an aggregation phenomenon occurred.

[0095] (5) Average particle diameter (nm): measured by a dynamic light scattering method using a Nicomp 380 HPL instrument (manufactured by Nicomp).

[0096] (6) Particle size distribution: measured by a dynamic light scattering method using a Nicomp 380 HPL instrument (manufactured by Nicomp).

Experimental Example 3

[0097] A property of graft copolymers of Examples and Comparative Examples was measured by a method described below, and results thereof are shown in Tables.

[0098] (7) Amount of aggregate (ppm): The graft copolymer latex was filtered through a 100-mesh sieve, placed in a convection oven, and allowed to stand at 80° C. for 720 minutes. Afterward, aggregates filtered on the 100-meth sieve were weighed, and the amount of aggregates for the graft copolymer latex was calculated by the following equation.

Amount of aggregate (ppm)={(Weight of aggregates filtered on 100-mesh sieve)/(Total theoretical weight of butadiene rubber polymer, styrene, acrylonitrile, and additives added in preparation of graft copolymer)}×1,000,000

Experimental Example 4

[0099] Each of the thermoplastic resin compositions of Examples and Comparative Examples was extruded to prepare a pellet. A property of the pellet was measured by a method described below, and results thereof are shown in Tables.

[0100] (8) Melt flow index (g/10 min): measured in accordance with ASTM D1238 at 220° C. and 10 kg.

Experimental Example 5

[0101] Each of the thermoplastic resin compositions of Examples and Comparative Examples was extruded and injection-molded to prepare a specimen. Properties of the specimen were measured by methods described below, and results thereof are shown in Table.

[0102] (9) Impact strength (kg m/m, ¼ In): measured in accordance with ASTM D256.

[0103] (10) Surface gloss characteristics: determined in accordance with ASTM D523 by measuring the injection-molded specimen at 45° using a gloss meter instrument (VG-7000+Cu-2 manufactured by Nippon Denshoku Industries Co., Ltd.).

[0104] (11) Gel evaluation: The pellet was extruded into a film in a film extruder and simultaneously evaluated in real time using an optical gel counter, and the size and number per unit area of gels were measured and evaluated. Evaluation criteria are as follows.

[0105] o: Gel size of 100 μm or more and 100 or less gels

[0106] Δ: Gel size of 100 μm or more and 250 or less gels

[0107] x: Gel size of 100 μm or more and more than 250 gels

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Comparative Examples Classification 1 2 3 4 Acrylic coagulant Monomer MAA 2 2 2.5 2.5 mixture MA 98 98 97.5 97.5 EA — — — — BA — — — — First emulsifier 0.299 0.299 0.207 0.219 (parts by weight) Second emulsifier 0.101 74.75 0.193 0.181 (parts by weight) n of Chemical 0 Formula 1 X of Expression 1 2.5~3.5 Y of Expression 2 108~111 86.1~89.1 (1) Average 110 100 75 85.5 particle diameter (2) Weight-average 921,000 921,000 909,000 890,000 molecular weight (3) Polymerization 99.7 99.9 99.9 99.8 conversion rate Addition amount of coagulant 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 (parts by weight) Second diene- (4) Aggregation × × × × based rubber phenomenon polymer (5) Average 198 220 284 288 particle diameter (6) Particle size 0.68 0.59 0.64 0.66 distribution (7) Amount of 730 400 350 120 aggregate Thermoplastic (8) Melt flow index 15 15.8 16.9 17.4 resin (9) Impact strength 8.9 12.7 21.3 23.3 composition (10) Surface gloss 92.3 89.6 90.9 97 characteristics (11) Gel evaluation ○ Δ ○ ○

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Examples Classification 1 2 3 Acrylic Monomer MAA 2.5 2.5 2.5 copolymer mixture MA 97.5 97.5 97.5 coagulant EA — — — BA — — — First emulsifier 0.222 0.225 0.23 (parts by weight) Second emulsifier 0.178 0.175 0.17 (parts by weight) n of Chemical 0 Formula 1 X of Expression 1 2.5~3.5 Y of Expression 2 86.1~89.1 (1) Average 86.5 88 89 particle diameter (2) Weight-average 912,000 918,000 909,000 molecular weight (3) Polymerization 99.7 99.9 99.9 conversion rate Addition amount of 0.66 0.66 0.66 coagulant (parts by weight) Second diene- (4) Aggregation × × × based rubber phenomenon polymer (5) Average 299 289 300 particle diameter (6) Particle size 0.65 0.64 0.61 distribution (7) Amount of 120 95 200 aggregate Thermoplastic (8) Melt flow index 18.1 18 17.9 resin (9) Impact strength 30.8 31 32.2 composition (10) Surface gloss characteristics 98.0 98.8 98.9 (11) Gel evaluation ○ ○ ○

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Comparative Examples Classification 5 6 7 8 9 Acrylic copolymer Monomer MAA 2.5 2.5 3 3 3 coagulant mixture MA 97.5 97.5 97 97 97 EA — — — — — BA — — — — — First emulsifier 0.232 0.3 0.14 0.19 0.189 (parts by weight) Second emulsifier 0.168 0.1 0.26 0.21 0.211 (parts by weight) n of Chemical 0 Formula 1 X of Expression 1 2.5~3.5 Y of Expression 2 86.1~89.1 71.5~74.5 (1) Average 89.5 100 67 70.5 71 particle diameter (2) Weight-average 901,000 911,000 830,000 801,000 800,000 molecular weight (3) Polymerization 99.7 99.9 99.9 100 99.9 conversion rate Addition amount 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 of coagulant (parts by weight) Second diene- (4) Aggregation x x x x x based rubber phenomenon polymer (5) Average 290 297 300 299 297 particle diameter (6) Particle size 0.66 0.66 0.54 0.54 0.59 distribution (7) Amount of 100 200 380 400 200 aggregate Thermoplastic (8) Melt flow index 17.4 17.4 16.5 16 16.1 resin composition (9) Impact strength 24 22 22.2 23 23.2 (10) Surface gloss 97.2 96.2 97.2 97.3 97.3 characteristics (11) Gel evaluation ∘ ∘ ∘ ∘ ∘

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Examples Classification 4 5 6 Acrylic Monomer MAA 3 3 3 copolymer mixture MA 97 97 97 coagulant EA — — — BA — — — First emulsifier 0.191 0.2 0.208 (parts by weight) Second emulsifier 0.209 0.2 0.192 (parts by weight) n of Chemical 0 Formula 1 X of Expression 1 2.5~3.5 Y of Expression 2 71.5~74.5 (1) Average particle 71.5 73 74.5 diameter (2) Weight-average 817,000 825,000 820,000 molecular weight (3) Polymerization 99.8 99.7 99.7 conversion rate Addition amount of 0.66 0.66 0.66 coagulant (parts by weight) Second diene- (4) Aggregation x x x based rubber phenomenon polymer (5) Average particle 301 296 310 diameter (6) Particle size 0.62 0.63 0.6 distribution (7) Amount of 200 100 100 aggregate Thermoplastic (8) Melt flow index 17.9 17.7 18 resin (9) Impact strength 32.2 31.6 30.4 composition (10) Surface gloss 98.2 99 98.7 characteristics (11) Gel evaluation ∘ ∘ ∘

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Comparative Examples Classification 10 11 12 13 Acrylic Monomer MAA 3 3 3.5 3.5 coagulant mixture MA 97 97 96.5 96.5 EA — — — — BA — — — — First emulsifier 0.21 0.25 0.05 0.056 (parts by weight) Second emulsifier 0.19 0.15 0.35 0.344 (parts by weight) n of Chemical 0 Formula 1 X of Expression 1 2.5~3.5 Y of Expression 2 71.5~74.5 about 61.07~64.07 (1) Average 75 85 59 60.5 particle diameter (2) Weight- 811,000 819,000 708,000 710,000 average molecular weight (3) Polymerization 99.9 99.9 99.9 >99.9 conversion rate Addition amount of coagulant 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 (parts by weight) Second (4) Aggregation x x x x diene- phenomenon based (5) Average 288 271 256 270 rubber particle diameter polymer (6) Particle size 0.59 0.61 0.56 0.6 distribution (7) Amount of 210 390 450 290 aggregate Thermo- (8) Melt flow index 14.7 17.2 15.5 16.2 plastic (9) Impact strength 23.7 19.9 8.9 16.6 resin (10) Surface gloss 97 97.1 95.5 95.4 compo- characteristics sition (11) Gel evaluation ∘ ∘ Δ Δ

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Examples Classification 7 8 9 10 Acrylic Monomer MAA 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 coagulant mixture MA 96.5 96.5 96.5 96.5 EA — — — — BA — — — — First 0.08 0.1 0.109 0.107 emulsifier (parts by weight) Second 0.32 0.3 0.291 0.293 emulsifier (parts by weight) n of Chemical 0 Formula 1 X of 2.5~3.5 Expression 1 Y of about 61.07~64.07 Expression 2 (1) Average 61.5 63 63.5 64 particle diameter (2) Weight- 707,000 719,000 710,000 706,000 average molecular weight (3) 99.8 100 99.9 >99.9 Polymerization conversion rate Addition 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.55 amount of coagulant (parts by weight) Second (4) x x x x diene- Aggregation based phenomenon rubber (5) Average 320 310 305 300 polymer particle diameter (6) Particle 0.6 0.63 0.63 0.60 size distribution (7) Amount of 100 93 120 190 aggregate Thermo- (8) Melt flow 17.6 17.7 18 17.3 plastic index resin (9) Impact 33.1 32.1 32.7 32.5 compo- strength sition (10) Surface 98 98.1 99.1 98.2 gloss characteristics (11) Gel ∘ ∘ ∘ ∘ evaluation

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Comparative Examples Classification 14 15 16 17 Acrylic Monomer MAA 3.5 3.5 4 4 coagulant mixture MA 96.5 96.5 96 96 EA — — — — BA — — — — First emulsifier 0.109 0.2 0.064 0.040 (parts by weight) Second 0.291 0.2 0.336 0.36 emulsifier (parts by weight) n of Chemical 1 Formula 1 X of 2.5~3.5 Expression 1 Y of about 61.07~64.07 53.25~56.25 Expression 2 (1) Average 64.5 74 58 55 particle diameter (2) Weight- 740,000 711,000 699,000 687,000 average molecular weight (3) >99.9 >99. >99. 99.9 Polymerization conversion rate Addition 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 amount of coagulant (parts by weight) Second (4) Aggregation x x ∘ ∘ diene- phenomenon based (5) Average 309 333 — — rubber particle diameter polymer (6) Particle size 0.60 0.63 — — distribution (7) Amount of 890 350 — — aggregate Thermo- (8) Melt flow 15.7 16.6 — — plastic index resin (9) Impact 26.0 20.6 — — compo- strength sition (10) Surface 96.3 95.1 — — gloss characteristics (11) Gel Δ Δ — — evaluation

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Comparative Examples Classification 18 19 20 21 Acrylic Monomer MAA 4 4.5 5 5 coagulant mixture MA — — — — EA 96 96 95 95 BA — — — — First emulsifier 0.336 0.34 0.297 0.31 (parts by weight) Second emulsifier 0.064 0.06 0.103 0.09 (parts by weight) n of Chemical 1 1 1 1 Formula 1 X of Expression 1 5~7 5~7 5~7 5~7 Y of Expression 2 about about about about 141~444 125.17~128.17 112.5~115.5 112.5~115.5 (1) Average 143 126 100 112 particle diameter (2) Weight-average 350,000 360,000 320,000 330,000 molecular weight (3) Polymerization >99.9 99.8 99.9 >99.9 conversion rate Addition amount of 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 coagulant (parts by weight) Second diene- (4) Aggregation x x x x basedr ubber phenomenon polymer (5) Average 191 201 278 311 particle diameter (6) Particle size 0.61 0.62 0.51 0.66 distribution (7) Amount of 700 1,000 1280 200 aggregate Thermoplastic (8) Melt flow index 14.8 15.0 17.2 16.4 resin (9) Impact strength 10.9 11.1 19.9 27.9 composition (10) Surface gloss 88.3 87.9 85.9 98.7 characteristics (11) Gel evaluation x x x ∘

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Examples Classification 11 12 13 Acrylic Monomer MAA 5 5 5 copolymer mixture MA — — — coagulant EA 95 95 95 BA — — — First emulsifier 0.312 0.313 0.315 (parts by weight) Second emulsifier 0.088 0.087 0.085 (parts by weight) n of Chemical 1 Formula 1 X of Expression 1 5~7 Y of Expression 2 about 112.5~115.5 (1) Average 112.5 114 115.5 particle diameter (2) Weight-average 330,000 322,000 334,000 molecular weight (3) Polymerization 99.9 >99.9 99.9 conversion rate Addition amount of 1.2 1.2 1.2 coagulant (parts by weight) Second (4) Aggregation x x x diene- phenomenon based (5) Average 299 293 302 rubber particle diameter polymer (6) Particle size 0.55 0.55 0.56 distribution (7) Amount of 150 120 100 aggregate Thermo- (8) Melt flow index 18.1 17.9 17.9 plastic (9) Impact strength 30.2 30.4 31.1 resin (10) Surface gloss 98.2 98.9 99 compo- characteristics sition (11) Gel evaluation ∘ ∘ ∘

TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Comparative Examples Classification 22 23 24 25 Acrylic Monomer MAA 5 5 6 6 copolymer mixture MA — — — — coagulant EA 95 95 94 94 BA — — — — First emulsifier 0.316 0.322 0.2 0.256 (parts by weight) Second emulsifier 0.084 0.078 0.2 0.144 (parts by weight) n of Chemical 1 Formula 1 X of Expression 1 5~7 Y of Expression 2 about 112.5~115.5 about 93.5~96.5 (1) Average 116 128 80 92.5 particle diameter (2) Weight-average 360,000 330,000 319,000 350,000 molecular weight (3) Polymerization >99.9 99.8 99.9 99.9 conversion rate Addition amount of 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 coagulant (parts by weight) Second diene- (4) Aggregation x x x x based rubber phenomenon polymer (5) Average 300 290 297 300 particle diameter (6) Particle size 0.59 0.55 0.5 0.6 distribution (7) Amount of 120 350 390 400 aggregate Thermoplastic (8) Melt flow index 19 16.6 17.3 17 resin (9) Impact strength 25 21.7 22.7 24.2 composition (10) Surface gloss 97 90.2 91.6 96 characteristics (11) Gel evaluation ∘ ∘ ∘ ∘

TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Examples Classification 14 15 16 Acrylic Monomer MAA 6 6 6 copolymer mixture MA — — — coagulant EA 94 94 94 BA — — — First emulsifier 0.08 0.1 0.107 (parts by weight) Second emulsifier 0.32 0.3 0.293 (parts by weight) n of Chemical 1 Formula 1 X of Expression 1 5~7 Y of Expression 2 about 93.5~96.5 (1) Average particle 93.5 95 96.5 diameter (2) Weight-average 303,000 308,000 298,000 molecular weight (3) Polymerization >99.9 99.8 99.9 conversion rate Addition amount of 1.2 1.2 1.2 coagulant (parts by weight) Second diene- (4) Aggregation x x x based rubber phenomenon polymer (5) Average particle 310 314 300 diameter (6) Particle size 0.56 0.56 0.6 distribution (7) Amount of 100 130 190 aggregate Thermoplastic (8) Melt flow index 18 18.1 17.9 resin (9) Impact strength 31 31.3 30.2 composition (10) Surface gloss 98.1 98 98 characteristics (11) Gel evaluation ∘ ∘ ∘

TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Comparative Examples Classification 26 27 28 29 Acrylic copolymer Monomer MAA 6 6 7 7 coagulant mixture MA — — — — EA 94 94 93 93 BA — — — — First emulsifier 0.303 0.306 0.19 0.283 (parts by weight) Second emulsifier 0.097 0.094 0.21 0.117 (parts by weight) n of Chemical 1 Formula 1 X of Expression 1 5~7 Y of Expression 2 about 93.5~96.5 79.93~82.93 (1) Average 97.5 99 71 79.5 particle diameter (2) Weight-average 360,000 317,000 289,000 300,000 molecular weight (3) Polymerization 99.8 >99.9 >99.9 >99.9 conversion rate Addition amount of 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 coagulant (parts by weight) Second diene- (4) Aggregation x x x x based rubber phenomenon polymer (5) Average 300 291 300 335 particle diameter (6) Particle size 0.62 0.59 0.45 0.44 distribution (7) Amount of 500 420 500 600 aggregate Thermoplastic (8) Melt flow index 17 16.9 18.9 18 resin composition (9) Impact strength 24.9 23 18.6 25.7 (10) Surface gloss 95.1 96.7 97.2 98 characteristics (11) Gel evaluation ∘ ∘ ∘ ∘

TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 13 Examples Classification 17 18 Acrylic Monomer MAA 7 7 copolymer mixture MA — — coagulant EA 93 93 BA — — First emulsifier 0.312 0.313 (parts by weight) Second emulsifier 0.088 0.087 (parts by weight) n of Chemical 1 Formula 1 X of Expression 1 5~7 Y of Expression 2 79.93~82.93 (1) Average particle 80 82.5 diameter (2) Weight-average 299,000 297,000 molecular weight (3) Polymerization >99.9 99.8 conversion rate Addition amount of 1.2 1.2 coagulant (parts by weight) Second diene- (4) Aggregation x x based rubber phenomenon polymer (5) Average particle 314 320 diameter (6) Particle size 0.47 0.48 distribution (7) Amount of 100 105 aggregate Thermoplastic (8) Melt flow index 18.9 18.5 resin (9) Impact strength 31.2 30.9 composition (10) Surface gloss 97.9 98.1 characteristics (11) Gel evaluation ∘ ∘

TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 14 Comparative Examples Classification 30 31 32 Acrylic coagulant Monomer MAA 7 7 7.5 mixture MA — — — EA 93 93 92.5 BA — — — First emulsifier 0.289 0.31 0.313 (parts by weight) Second emulsifier 0.111 0.09 0.087 (parts by weight) n of Chemical 1 Formula 1 X of Expression 1 5~7 Y of Expression 2 79.93~82.93 about 74.5~77.5 (1) Average particle 83.5 95 76 diameter (2) Weight-average 310,000 292,000 300,000 molecular weight (3) Polymerization 99.8 99.9 99.9 conversion rate Addition amoun of 1.2 1.2 1.2 coagulant (parts by weight) Second diene- (4) Aggregation x x ∘ based rubber phenomenon polymer (5) Average particle 348 351 — diameter (6) Particle size 0.46 0.6 — distribution (7) Amount of 800 270 — aggregate Thermoplastic (8) Melt flow index 17.2 18.1 — resin composition (9) Impact strength 26 21.9 — (10) Surface gloss 98 99 — characteristics (11) Gel evaluation ∘ ∘ —

TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 15 Comparative Examples Classification 33 34 35 36 37 38 Acrylic Monomer MAA 16 16 16 18 18 18 copolymer mixture MA — — — — — — coagulant EA — — — — — — BA 84 84 84 82 82 82 First emulsifier 0.363 0.34 0.385 0.3 0.349 0.367 (parts by weight) Second emulsifier 0.037 0.06 0.018 0.1 0.051 0.033 (parts by weight) n of Chemical 3 Formula 1 X of Expression 1 16~18 Y of Expression 2 about 156.07~159.07 about 138.56~141.56 (1) Average 157 131 180 110 140 160 particle diameter (2) Weight-average 500,000 466,000 455,000 440,000 453,000 453,000 molecular weight (3) Polymerization >99.9 99.8 99.9 99.9 >99.9 99.8 conversion rate Addition amount of 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 coagulant (parts by weight) Second (4) Aggregation × ∘ × × × × diene- phenomenon based (5) Average 306 — 344 321 331 348 rubber particle diameter polymer (6) Particle size 0.66 — 0.68 0.59 0.64 0.7 distribution (7) Amount of 500 — 200 180 110 175 aggregate Thermo- (8) Melt flow index 17.4 — 17 16.9 17.6 15.9 plastic resin (9) Impact strength 29 — 18.8 20.2 31.3 18.5 composition (10) Surface gloss characteristics 90 — 92 90 84 84 (11) Gel evaluation Δ — × × Δ ×

TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 16 Comparative Examples Classification 39 40 41 Acrylic Monomer MAA 20 20 20 copolymer mixture MA — — — coagulant EA — — — BA 80 80 80 First emulsifier 0.3 0.342 0.358 (parts by weight) Second emulsifier 0.1 0.058 0.042 (parts by weight) n of Chemical 3 Formula 1 X of Expression 1 16~18 Y of Expression 2 about 124.55~127.55 (1) Average particle 100 126 147 diameter (2) Weight-average 411,000 408,000 427,000 molecular weight (3) Polymerization 99.9 99.8 99.9 conversion rate Addition amount of 1.2 1.2 1.2 coagulant (parts by weight) Second diene- (4) Aggregation x x ∘ based rubber phenomenon polymer (5) Average particle 330 330 — diameter (6) Particle size 0.57 0.65 — distribution (7) Amount of 400 102 — aggregate Thermoplastic (8) Melt flow index 16 17.2 — resin (9) Impact strength 15.9 29.4 — composition (10) Surface gloss 88 84 — characteristics (11) Gel evaluation x Δ —

[0108] Referring to Table, it can be seen that Examples 1 to 10 exhibited a small amount of aggregates compared to Comparative Examples 1 to 17 and thus were excellent in latex stability, a melt flow index, impact strength, and surface gloss characteristics. It can be seen that Comparative Examples 1 and 2, in which the X value was below the range of Expression 1, exhibited degraded latex stability due to a large amount of aggregates and degraded processability due to a low melt flow index, and the impact strength and surface gloss characteristics thereof were also degraded. In addition, it can be seen that Comparative Example 2, in which the addition amount of a coagulant increased compared to Comparative Example 1, exhibited an improved melt flow index and improved impact strength, but surface gloss characteristics were degraded, and many gels were generated, leading to degraded appearance characteristics.

[0109] It can be seen that Comparative Examples 3 to 15, which did not satisfy Expression 2, exhibited degraded latex stability due to a large amount of aggregates and degraded processability due to a low melt flow index, and the impact strength and surface gloss characteristics thereof were also degraded.

[0110] In the case of Comparative Examples 16 and 17 in which the X value was above the range of Expression 1, an aggregation phenomenon occurred, and thus it was not possible to prepare a second diene-based rubber polymer.

[0111] It can be seen that Examples 11 to 16 exhibited a small amount of aggregates compared to Comparative Examples 18 to 32 and thus were excellent in latex stability, a melt flow index, impact strength, and surface gloss characteristics.

[0112] It can be seen that Comparative Examples 18 and 19, in which the X value was below the range of Expression 1, exhibited degraded latex stability due to a large amount of aggregates and degraded processability due to a low melt flow index, and the impact strength and surface gloss characteristics thereof were also degraded. In addition, it can be seen that Comparative Example 2, in which the addition amount of a coagulant increased compared to Comparative Example 1, exhibited an improved melt flow index and improved impact strength, but surface gloss characteristics were degraded, and many gels were generated, leading to degraded appearance characteristics.

[0113] It can be seen that Comparative Examples 20 to 31, which did not satisfy Expression 2, exhibited degraded latex stability due to a large amount of aggregates and degraded processability due to a low melt flow index, and the impact strength and surface gloss characteristics thereof were also degraded.

[0114] In the case of Comparative Example 32 in which Chemical Formula 1 and Expression 2 were satisfied, and the X value was above the range of Expression 1, an aggregation phenomenon occurred, and thus it was not possible to prepare a second diene-based rubber polymer.

[0115] It can be seen that Comparative Examples 33 and 37, which did not satisfy Chemical Formula 1, exhibited degraded latex stability due to a large amount of aggregates and degraded processability due to a low melt flow index, and the impact strength and surface gloss characteristics thereof were also degraded

[0116] In the case of Comparative Example 34 in which Chemical Formula 1 was not satisfied, Expression 1 was satisfied, and the Y value was below the range of Expression 2, an aggregation phenomenon occurred, and thus it was not possible to prepare a second diene-based rubber polymer.

[0117] It can be seen that Comparative Examples 35 and 38, in which Chemical Formula 1 was not satisfied, Expression 1 was satisfied, and the Y value was above the range of Expression 2, exhibited degraded latex stability due to a large amount of aggregates and degraded processability due to a low melt flow index, and the impact strength and surface gloss characteristics thereof were also degraded, and an excessive amount of large-sized gels were generated, leading to poor appearance characteristics.

[0118] It can be seen that Comparative Example 36, in which Chemical Formula 1 was not satisfied, Expression 1 was satisfied, and the Y value was below the range of Expression 2, exhibited degraded latex stability due to a large amount of aggregates and degraded processability due to a low melt flow index, and the impact strength and surface gloss characteristics thereof were also degraded, and an excessive amount of large-sized gels were generated, leading to poor appearance characteristics.

[0119] It can be seen that Comparative Example 39, in which Chemical Formula 1 and Expression 1 were not satisfied, and the Y value was below the range of Expression 2, exhibited degraded latex stability due to a large amount of aggregates and degraded processability due to a low melt flow index, and the impact strength and surface gloss characteristics thereof were also degraded, and an excessive amount of large-sized gels were generated, leading to poor appearance characteristics.

[0120] It can be seen that Comparative Example 40, which did not satisfy Chemical Formula 1 and Expression 1 and satisfied Expression 2, exhibited degraded latex stability due to a large amount of aggregates and degraded processability due to a low melt flow index, and the impact strength and surface gloss characteristics thereof were also degraded, and an excessive amount of large-sized gels were generated, leading to poor appearance characteristics.

[0121] In the case of Comparative Example 41 in which Chemical Formula 1 and Expression 1 were not satisfied, and the Y value was above the range of Expression 2, an aggregation phenomenon occurred, and thus it was not possible to prepare a second diene-based rubber polymer.