Joint of copper terminal and aluminium conductor and ultrasonic welding method hereof

Abstract

Disclosed are a joint of a copper terminal and an aluminium conductor and an ultrasonic welding method thereof. One spacing metal layer is added between the copper terminal and the aluminium conductor, and firstly, the spacing metal layer is fixed at a welding end of a base material by means of a manner such as electroplating, pressure welding, electric arc spray welding or electromagnetic welding, and the three parts are then welded together by means of an ultrasonic welding manner. The welding method is suitable for the welding of various joints, the electrochemical corrosion resulting from the potential difference between the copper and aluminium electrodes can be effectively reduced, and the mechanical properties of the joint can be improved.

Claims

1. A joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire, wherein the copper terminal comprises a connecting part and a functional part connected with the connecting part, a conductive core of the aluminum wire is connected with the connecting part of the copper terminal, and wherein the conductive core of the aluminum wire is connected with the connecting part of the copper terminal via a metal spacer layer, wherein the joint of the copper terminal and the aluminum wire has a welding zone, and an area of the welding zone of the joint is at least 1% of that of an overlapping zone between the aluminum wire and the copper terminal, wherein a thickness of the metal spacer layer ranges from 3 μm to 5000 μm.

2. The joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire according to claim 1, wherein the copper terminal is a flat terminal, an open terminal, a barrel-shaped terminal, or an end of a solid-core copper wire, and preferably, the aluminum wire is a solid-core aluminum wire or a multi-core aluminum wire.

3. The joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire according to claim 1, wherein the conductive core of the aluminum wire is made of aluminum or aluminum alloy, and the copper terminal is made of copper or copper alloy.

4. The joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire according to claim 1, wherein the area of the welding zone of the joint is at least 10% of that of the overlapping zone between the aluminum wire and the copper terminal.

5. The joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire according to claim 1, wherein the thickness of the metal spacer layer ranges from 5 μm to 1000 μm.

6. The joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire according to claim 1, wherein the metal spacer layer is made of a material having an electrode potential between an electrode potential of copper and an electrode potential of aluminum, or equal to the electrode potential of copper or the electrode potential of aluminum; preferably, the metal spacer layer is made of one or a combination of nickel, cadmium, zirconium, chromium, manganese, aluminum, tin, titanium, zinc, cobalt; more preferably, the metal spacer layer is made of one or a combination of aluminum, nickel and zinc.

7. The joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire according to claim 1, wherein the metal spacer layer is made of gold or silver or a combination thereof.

8. An ultrasonic welding method for forming a joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire, wherein the ultrasonic welding method comprises the following steps of: 1) fixing, by an electroplating process or an electromagnetic welding process or an arc spraying process or a pressure welding process, a metal spacer layer to a zone of the to-be-welded copper terminal or aluminum wire, wherein the zone at least comprises a welding zone, and preferably, the metal spacer layer is fixed to the zone of the to-be-welded copper terminal or aluminum wire by an electroplating process, wherein an area of the welding zone of the joint is at least 1% of that of an overlapping zone between the aluminum wire and the copper terminal, and a thickness of the metal spacer layer ranges from 3 μm to 5000 μm; 2) joining the copper terminal and the aluminum wire and fixing the joined copper terminal and aluminum wire to a mold or a tool of an ultrasonic welding device; 3) starting the ultrasonic welding device, and welding the joined copper terminal and aluminum wire by using the vibration energy of the ultrasonic welding device transferred to the ultrasonic mold or tool, wherein the copper terminal and the aluminum wire are melted due to heat generated by high-speed friction between the copper terminal and the aluminum wire, and the welding process is performed under a pressure.

9. The method according to claim 8, wherein a welding amplitude of the ultrasonic welding device ranges from 0 to 100%, and a pressure applied by a welding head of the ultrasonic welding device ranges from 0.5 KN to 30 KN; preferably, the welding amplitude of the ultrasonic welding device ranges from 30% to 100%; and the pressure applied by the welding head of the ultrasonic welding device ranges from 3 KN to 20 KN.

10. The method according to claim 8, wherein a frequency of the ultrasonic welding device ranges from 5 KHZ to 40 KHZ, and a power of the ultrasonic welding device ranges from 2 kW to 20 kW; preferably, the frequency of the ultrasonic welding device ranges from 15 KHZ to 25 KHZ, and the power of the ultrasonic welding device ranges from 5 KW to 15 KW.

11. The method according to claim 8, wherein the copper terminal is a flat terminal, an open terminal, a barrel-shaped terminal, or an end of a solid-core copper wire, and preferably, the aluminum wire is a solid-core aluminum wire or a multi-core aluminum wire.

12. The method according to claim 8, wherein the conductive core of the aluminum wire is made of aluminum or aluminum alloy, and the copper terminal is made of copper or copper alloy.

13. The method according to claim 8, wherein the area of the welding zone of the joint is at least 10% of that of the overlapping zone between the aluminum wire and the copper terminal.

14. The method according to claim 8, wherein the thickness of the metal spacer layer ranges from 5 μm to 1000 μm.

15. The method according to claim 8, wherein the metal spacer layer is made of a material having an electrode potential between an electrode potential of copper and an electrode potential of aluminum, or equal to the electrode potential of copper or the electrode potential of aluminum; preferably, the metal spacer layer is made of one or a combination of nickel, cadmium, zirconium, chromium, manganese, aluminum, tin, titanium, zinc, cobalt; more preferably, the metal spacer layer is made of one or a combination of aluminum, nickel and zinc.

16. The method according to claim 8, wherein the metal spacer layer is made of gold or silver or a combination thereof.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire according to a first embodiment of the present application.

(2) A: joint between a multi-core aluminum wire and a flat copper terminal;

(3) B: joint of a solid-core aluminum wire and the flat copper terminal; and

(4) C: schematic side view of the joint shown in FIG. 1A.

(5) FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire according to a second embodiment of the present application.

(6) A: open copper terminal before a welding process is performed;

(7) B: multi-core aluminum wire;

(8) C: solid aluminum wire; and

(9) D: cross-sectional view of a joint formed by a welding process according to the second embodiment.

(10) FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire according to a third embodiment of the present application.

(11) A: joint of a multi-core aluminum wire and a cylindrical copper terminal; and

(12) B: joint of a solid-core aluminum wire and the cylindrical copper terminal.

(13) FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire according to a fourth embodiment of the present application.

(14) A: joint of a multi-core aluminum wire and a flat copper wire;

(15) B: joint of a solid-core aluminum wire and the flat copper wire; and

(16) C: schematic side view of the joint shown in FIG. 3A.

(17) Reference signs in the drawings are listed as follows:

(18) TABLE-US-00001 1 copper terminal 2 aluminum wire 3 metal spacer layer 11 connecting part 12 functional part 21 conductive core 22 insulation layer

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

(19) The technical solutions of the present application are further illustrated by the specific embodiments hereinafter, the specific embodiments do not intend to limit the protection scope of the present application. Some non-essential modifications and adaptations made by others according to the concept of the present application should fall within the protection scope of the present application.

(20) In the present application, the “welding zone” refers to a zone where the copper terminal and the aluminum wire are welded together via a welding head of an ultrasonic device.

(21) In the present application, for the description “a conductive core of an aluminum wire is connected with a connecting part of a copper terminal via a metal spacer layer”, it should be understood that the direct connection or the indirect connection fall within the protection scope of the present application. The direct connection means that the connecting part is connected with the conductive core of the aluminum wire only via the metal spacer layer. The indirect connection means that, in addition to the metal spacer layer, there is another structure of non-metallic material, such as a graphene layer or a structure formed by another material, between the connecting part and the conductive core of the aluminum wire.

First Embodiment Joint of a Copper Terminal and an Aluminum Wire and an Ultrasonic Welding Method Thereof

(22) FIG. 1 shows a joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire. The copper terminal 1 is a flat copper terminal, and the copper terminal 1 includes a connecting part 11 and a functional part 12. The aluminum wire 2 includes a conductive core 21 and an insulation layer 22, and the aluminum wire is a multicore aluminum wire (FIG. 1A) or a solid-core aluminum wire (FIG. 1B). The conductive core of the aluminum wire 2 is connected with the connecting part 11 of the copper terminal 1, and a metal spacer layer 3 is interposed between the wire core of the aluminum wire and the connecting part of the copper terminal.

(23) The joint is formed with a welding method including the following steps 1 to 3. In step 1), a metal spacer layer (the metal spacer layer is made of nickel in the present embodiment) is electroplated at a welding zone of the copper terminal, where the thickness of the metal spacer layer is 8 μm. In step 2), the copper terminal is arranged in a mold of an ultrasonic welding device, and the aluminum wire is also arranged in the mold and stacked with the copper terminal. In step 3), the ultrasonic welding device is started, in a case that the three metals are compacted by a welding head, the vibration welding process is performed. A frequency of the ultrasonic is 20 KHZ, a power of the ultrasonic welding device is 5 kW, a welding amplitude is 80%, and a pressure of the ultrasonic welding head is 4.5 KN.

Second Embodiment Joint of a Copper Terminal and an Aluminum Wire and an Ultrasonic Welding Method Thereof

(24) FIG. 2 shows a joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire. The copper terminal 1 is an open terminal, and the copper terminal 1 includes a connecting part 11 and a functional part 12. The aluminum wire 2 includes a conductive core 21 and an insulation layer 22, and the aluminum wire is a multicore aluminum wire (FIG. 2B) or a solid-core aluminum wire (FIG. 2C). The conductive core 21 of the aluminum wire 2 is connected with the connecting part 11 of the copper terminal 1, and a metal spacer layer 3 is interposed between the wire core of the aluminum wire and the connecting part of the copper terminal.

(25) The joint is formed with a welding method including the following steps 1 to 4. In step 1), a metal spacer layer (the metal spacer layer is made of zinc in the present embodiment) is electroplated at a welding zone of the copper terminal, where the thickness of the metal spacer layer is 5 μm. In step 2), the copper terminal is arranged in a pressing mold, and the conductive core of the aluminum wire is arranged in an opening of the copper terminal. A pressing machine is started to press the aluminum wire toward the copper terminal, such that a to-be-welding part of the aluminum wire is surrounded by the opening of the copper terminal. In step 3), the joined three metals obtained in step 2) are arranged in an ultrasonic welding mold. In step 4), the ultrasonic welding device is started, in a case that the three metals are compacted by the welding head, the vibration welding process is performed. A frequency of the ultrasonic is 20 KHZ, a power of the ultrasonic welding device is 9 kW, a welding amplitude is 90%, and a pressure of the ultrasonic welding head is 15 KN.

Third Embodiment Joint of a Copper Terminal and an Aluminum Wire and an Ultrasonic Welding Method Thereof

(26) FIG. 3 shows a joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire. The copper terminal 1 is a barrel-shaped terminal, and the copper terminal 1 includes a connecting part 11 and a functional part 12. The aluminum wire 2 includes a conductive core 21 and an insulation layer 22, and the aluminum wire is a multicore aluminum wire (FIG. 3A) or a solid-core aluminum wire (FIG. 3B). The conductive core 21 of the aluminum wire 2 is connected with the connecting part 11 of the copper terminal 1, and a metal spacer layer 3 is interposed between the wire core of the aluminum wire and the connecting part of the copper terminal.

(27) The joint is formed with a welding method including the following steps 1 to 4. In step 1), a metal spacer layer (the metal spacer layer is made of silver in the present embodiment) is electroplated at a welding zone of the copper terminal, where the thickness of the metal spacer layer is 10 μm. In step 2), a welding zone of the conductive core of the aluminum wire is inserted into a cylinder of the copper terminal. In step 3), the three metals after the inserting process in step 2) are arranged in a mold of an ultrasonic welding device. In step 4), the ultrasonic welding device is started, in a case that the three metals are compacted by the welding head, the vibration welding process is performed. A frequency of the ultrasonic is 25 KHZ, a power of the ultrasonic welding device is 7.5 kW, a welding amplitude is 100%, and a pressure of the ultrasonic welding head is 10 KN.

Fourth Embodiment Joint of a Solid-Core Copper Wire and an Aluminum Wire and an Ultrasonic Welding Method Thereof

(28) FIG. 4 shows a joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire. The copper terminal 1 is a solid-core copper wire, and the solid copper wire 1 includes a connecting part 11 and a functional part 12. The aluminum wire 2 includes a conductive core 21 and an insulation layer 22, and the aluminum wire is a multicore aluminum wire (FIG. 4A) or a solid-core aluminum wire (FIG. 4B). The conductive core 21 of the aluminum wire 2 is connected with the solid copper wire 11, and a metal spacer layer 3 is interposed between the wire core of the aluminum wire and the connecting part of the solid copper wire.

(29) In a case that the copper terminal is a flat solid wire, and the aluminum wire is a solid-core aluminum wire or a multicore aluminum wire, the joint is formed with a welding method including the following steps 1 to 3. In step 1), a metal spacer layer (the metal spacer layer is made of aluminum in the present embodiment) is electroplated at a welding zone of the copper terminal, where the thickness of the metal spacer layer is 6 μm. In step 2), the copper terminal is arranged in a mold of an ultrasonic welding device, and the aluminum wire is also arranged in the mold of the ultrasonic welding device and stacked with the solid copper wire. In step 3), the ultrasonic welding device is started, in a case that the three metals are compacted by a welding head, the vibration welding process is performed. A frequency of the ultrasonic is 15 KHZ, a welding amplitude is 80%, a power of the ultrasonic welding device is 12 kW, and a pressure of the ultrasonic welding head is 20 KN.

Fifth Embodiment Effects of Different Spacer Layers on Performances of the Welded Joint

(30) Fifty pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires are taken as an example. In this example, the copper terminals are made of the same material and have the same structure, and the aluminum wires are made of the same material and have the same structure, the same ultrasonic welding device and tooling are used with the same welding parameters, plating thickness (8 μm) and welding method as that in the first embodiment. Among the fifty pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires, ten pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires are processed without any metal spacer layer, another 10 pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires are processed with a metal spacer layer made of nickel (Ni), another 10 pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires are processed with a metal spacer layer made of zinc (Zn), another 10 pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires are processed with a metal spacer layer which includes a nickel (Ni) plated bottom and a zinc (Zn) plated surface, and the remaining 10 pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires are processed with an anti-corrosion conductive sealant as a metal spacer layer. After the welding process is performed, the mechanical and electrical performances of each welded joint are tested before and after corrosion, and then a comparison is performed.

(31) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 1 Effects of different spacer layers on the pull-out force (N) Spacer layer Ni plated Ni plated bottom and bottom and Zn plated Zn plated None Sealant Ni Zn surface None Sealant Ni Zn surface Number Before salt spray corrosion Salt spray corrosion for 24 hours 1 1803 1654 1892 1827 1905 1455 1433 1820 1756 1895 2 1812 1680 1884 1821 1901 1472 1462 1834 1762 1887 3 1806 1677 1908 1834 1892 1462 1472 1856 1749 1878 4 1811 1656 1911 1826 1874 1457 1465 1843 1758 1861 5 1817 1664 1886 1827 1895 1452 1458 1835 1755 1877 6 1801 1628 1879 1819 1907 1468 1475 1849 1746 1893 7 1816 1692 1894 1825 1865 1468 1464 1835 1752 1837 8 1817 1672 1892 1832 1893 1457 1453 1837 1764 1857 9 1824 1684 1877 1828 1887 1465 1471 1834 1753 1866 10 1809 1683 1908 1818 1906 1477 1468 1848 1758 1892 Average 1812 1669 1893 1826 1893 1463 1462 1839 1755 1874

(32) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 2 Effects of different spacer layers on the voltage drop (mV) Spacer layer Ni plated Ni plated bottom and bottom and Zn plated Zn plated None Sealant Ni Zn surface None Sealant Ni Zn surface Number Before salt spray corrosion Salt spray corrosion for 24 hours 1 3.2 4.6 3.7 3.5 3.4 7 7.2 4.5 3.9 4.2 2 3.5 4.3 3.6 3.2 3.5 6.9 7.4 4.4 4.1 4.1 3 3.1 4.7 3.8 3.4 3.5 7.2 7.5 4.7 3.8 4.3 4 3.4 4.5 3.7 3.5 3.6 7.1 7.4 4.6 3.8 4.2 5 3.2 4.7 3.9 3.6 3.5 7.3 7.5 4.7 3.9 4.2 6 3.2 4.3 3.7 3.5 3.6 6.8 7.4 4.5 3.8 4.3 7 3.5 4.5 3.6 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.6 4.7 3.7 4.2 8 3.4 4.7 3.8 3.4 3.4 7.1 7.5 4.6 4.2 4.4 9 3.5 4.5 3.7 3.2 3.6 7 7.3 4.6 4 4.3 10 3.1 4.8 3.5 3.4 3.3 6.9 7.5 4.5 4.1 4.2 Average 3.31 4.56 3.7 3.43 3.48 7.05 7.43 4.58 3.93 4.24

(33) It can be seen from Tables 1 and 2 that, the performances in the pull-out force and the voltage drop for the structures with a Ni plating layer or a Zn plating layer or a composite plating layer are better than those for the structures with the sealant. Moreover, after the salt spray test of 24 hours, the reduction of the performances in the pull-out force and the voltage drop for the structures with the Ni plating layer or the Zn plating layer or the composite plating layer are much less than those for the structures with the sealant.

(34) Also it can be seen from Tables 1 and 2 that, although the performances in the pull-out force and the voltage drop for the welded structure without a plating layer are close to those for the structures with the Ni plating layer or the Zn plating layer or the composite plating layer at an initial stage of the welding process, after the salt spray test is performed, since electrochemical corrosion and metal corrosion both occur between copper and aluminum under the action of air, water and salt spray, the performances in the pull-out force and the voltage drop are greatly reduced, failing to ensure the electrical and mechanical performances of the joint of the copper terminal and the aluminum wire.

Sixth Embodiment Effects of Different Metal Spacer Layer Fixing Manners on the Performance of the Welded Joint

(35) Forty pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires are taken as an example. In this example, the copper terminals are made of the same material and have the same structure, and the aluminum wires are made of the same material and have the same structure, the same ultrasonic welding device and tooling are used, and the metal spacer layers are made of Zn and have the same thickness. Among the forty pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires, for ten pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires, the spacer metal Zn is fixed to the copper terminal with a pressure welding method; for another ten pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires, the spacer metal is fixed to the copper terminal with an electromagnetic welding method; for another ten pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires, the spacer metal Zn is fixed to the copper terminal with an electroplating method; and for the remaining ten pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires, the spacer metal Zn is fixed to the copper terminal with an arc spraying method. The copper terminal and the aluminum wire are welded together, and after the welding process is performed, the mechanical and electrical performances of the joint of the copper terminal and the aluminum wire are detected before and after corrosion, and then a comparison is performed.

(36) The detection results for the salt spray corrosion, voltage drop and pull-out force are shown in Tables 3 and 4.

(37) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 3 Effects of metal spacer layers fixed with different fixing manners on the pull-out force (N) Fixing manner Pressure Electromagnetic Arc Pressure Electromagnetic Arc welding welding Electroplating spraying welding welding Electroplating spraying Number Before salt spray corrosion Salt spray corrosion for 24 hours 1 1856 1872 1925 1902 1639 1654 1835 1827 2 1837 1853 1901 1896 1643 1649 1826 1831 3 1848 1864 1934 1894 1640 1659 1832 1824 4 1840 1867 1921 1907 1649 1662 1838 1830 5 1852 1858 1928 1911 1658 1660 1827 1826 6 1859 1869 1933 1895 1666 1658 1846 1817 7 1849 1863 1927 1890 1649 1665 1837 1824 8 1846 1874 1936 1906 1643 1657 1836 1825 9 1857 1854 1916 1897 1648 1664 1841 1813 10 1844 1866 1911 1912 1637 1663 1843 1828 Average 1849 1864 1923 1901 1647 1659 1836 1824

(38) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 4 Effects of metal spacer layers fixed with different fixing manners on the voltage drop (mV) Fixing manner Pressure Electromagnetic Arc Pressure Electromagnetic Arc welding welding Electroplating spraying welding welding Electroplating spraying Number Before salt spray corrosion Salt spray corrosion for 24 hours 1 3.8 3.5 3.2 3.4 4.8 4.6 3.9 4.0 2 3.7 3.3 3.4 3.3 4.7 4.7 3.7 4.1 3 3.7 3.4 3.4 3.3 4.7 4.8 3.8 3.9 4 3.8 3.4 3.3 3.4 4.8 4.7 3.7 3.8 5 3.6 3.3 3.2 3.5 4.9 4.7 3.9 3.9 6 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.4 4.8 4.8 4.0 3.9 7 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.6 4.7 4.7 3.8 4.1 8 3.8 3.5 3.2 3.4 4.9 4.8 3.9 3.9 9 3.8 3.6 3.1 3.5 4.9 4.6 3.8 3.8 10 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.5 4.8 4.6 3.8 3.9 Average 3.72 3.44 3.29 3.43 4.8 4.7 3.83 3.93

(39) It can be seen from Table 3 and Table 4 that, for the different welding methods, the joint formed by the electroplating method have good mechanical and electrical performances, the joint formed by the electromagnetic welding method and the arc spraying method have the medium mechanical and electrical performances, and the joint formed by the pressure welding method have poor mechanical and electrical performances. In a case that the metal spacer layers in the four cases have the same thickness, the joint of a copper terminal and an aluminum wire, which is formed with the electroplating method, has a good performance. Moreover, the electroplating technology is mature and has advantages in processing cost and time cost.

Seventh Embodiment Effects of Welding Zones with Different Areas on the Performance of the Welded Joint

(40) One hundred and twenty pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires are taken as an example. In this example, the copper terminals are made of the same material and have the same structure, and the aluminum wires are made of the same material and have the same structure, the pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires are divided into 12 groups, and each group includes 10 pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires, and the same ultrasonic welding device and tooling are used, and the metal spacer layers are made of Zn and have the same thickness. For the overlapping zones between the aluminum wires and the copper terminals having the same area, welding zones with different areas are formed. The welding zones with different areas have different proportions relative to the overlapping zone between the aluminum wire and the copper terminal, and effects of the welding zones with different areas on the electrical and mechanical performances of the joint formed with the ultrasonic welding method are detected, and then a comparison is performed.

(41) It can be seen from data in the following Table 5 that, in a case that the welding zone has large proportion relative to the overlapping zone between the aluminum wire and the copper terminal, the welded joint thus formed has good performances in the voltage drop and the pull-out force. In a case that the proportion is less than 1%, the electrical and mechanical performances of the joint are significantly decreased. Therefore, the area of the welding zone of the joint is at least 1% of that of the overlapping zone between the aluminum wire and the copper terminal. Preferably, the area of the welding zone of the joint is at least 10% of that of the overlapping zone between the aluminum wire and the copper terminal.

(42) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 5 Effects of welding zones with different areas on the voltage drop (mV) and the pull-out force (N) Number Area proportion Voltage drop (mV) pull-out force (N) 1 100%  3.1 2158.4 2 90% 3.1 2013.5 3 80% 3.2 1976.9 4 70% 3.2 1952.6 5 60% 3.4 1916.7 6 50% 3.4 1904.9 7 40% 3.5 1894.2 8 30% 3.6 1861.8 9 20% 3.6 1849.2 10 10% 3.7 1827.5 11  1% 3.8 1817.4 12 <1% 4.2 1628.9

Eighth Embodiment Effects of Metal Spacer Layers with Different Thicknesses on the Performances of the Welded Joint

(43) One hundred and fifty pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires are taken as an example. In this example, the copper terminals and aluminum wires are the same in structure and material as that in the third embodiment, the pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires are divided into 15 groups, and each group includes 10 pairs of copper terminals and aluminum wires, the copper terminals are respectively plated with zinc with the electroplating method to form metal spacer layers of different thickness ranging from 1 μm to 1000 μm, and the metal spacer layers made of zinc of different thickness ranging from 1000 μm to 6000 μm are respectively fixed to the copper terminals with the pressure welding method. The aluminum wires are welded with respective copper terminals with the same ultrasonic welding device and tooling, and the pull-out force and the voltage drop are tested for each welded copper-aluminum joint after the welding process is performed.

(44) It can be seen from the data in the following Tables 6 and 7 that, in a case that the thickness of the metal spacer layer is more than 5000 μm or less than 3 μm, the mechanical and electrical performances of the joint of the copper terminal and the aluminum wire are significantly decreased. Therefore, the thickness of the metal spacer layer ranges from 3 μm to 5000 μm. Preferably, in a case that the thickness of the metal spacer layer ranges from 5 μm to 1000 μm, the joint of the copper terminal and the aluminum wire has good mechanical and electrical performances.

(45) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 6 Effects of metal spacer layers with different thickness on the pull-out force (N) Thickness of the metal spacer layer 1 3 5 10 50 100 300 500 μm μm μm μm μm μm μm μm Number The pull-out force (N) after welding 1 1533 1772 1832 1952 1916 1901 1867 1813 2 1528 1756 1848 1968 1921 1894 1858 1817 3 1552 1784 1831 1948 1924 1876 1866 1825 4 1542 1763 1836 1943 1917 1911 1859 1829 5 1534 1759 1821 1968 1915 1885 1854 1830 6 1529 1762 1842 1964 1928 1898 1853 1817 7 1538 1758 1835 1968 1934 1879 1862 1814 8 1543 1766 1844 1971 1927 1876 1865 1824 9 1537 1754 1836 1980 1923 1905 1858 1820 10 1549 1752 1846 1974 1927 1895 1854 1828 Average 1538.5 1762.6 1837.1 1963.6 1923.2 1892 1859.6 1821.7 Thickness of the metal spacer layer 800 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 μm μm μm μm μm μm μm Number The pull-out force (N) after welding 1 1802 1784 1746 1728 1703 1675 1489 2 1798 1772 1751 1722 1694 1684 1495 3 1786 1756 1743 1731 1708 1672 1482 4 1792 1768 1739 1725 1714 1664 1496 5 1784 1761 1755 1728 1704 1681 1502 6 1782 1782 1747 1734 1709 1672 1487 7 1790 1762 1752 1729 1712 1669 1479 8 1804 1759 1747 1727 1705 1666 1512 9 1808 1785 1738 1719 1699 1681 1483 10 1794 1759 1747 1734 1710 1662 1487 Average 1794 1768.8 1746.5 1727.7 1705.8 1672.6 1491.2

(46) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 7 Effects of metal spacer layers with different thicknesses on the voltage drop (mV) Thickness of the metal spacer layer 1 3 5 10 50 100 300 500 800 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 μm μm μm μm μm μm μm μm μm μm μm μm μm μm μm Number The voltage drop (mV) after welding 1 4.1 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.9 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.7 2 4.0 3.5 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.3 4.8 3 4.2 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.3 4.5 4 4.1 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.8 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.7 5 4.2 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.7 4.0 3.9 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.5 6 4.0 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.4 7 4.2 3.3 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.5 3.4 3.6 3.8 3.9 3.9 4.0 4.2 4.3 4.5 8 4.1 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.5 9 4.2 3.4 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.1 4.3 4.4 10 4.2 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Average 4.13 3.4 3.23 3.13 3.24 3.43 3.52 3.62 3.71 3.91 3.97 4.11 4.19 4.28 4.65