Tablecloth for trays

Abstract

A paper mat (1) for fast food trays, includes a central area (9) and, at both side ends, at least three and at most four folding areas (5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13) defined and divided from each other and regarding such central area (9) by parallel folding lines (2), each of such folding areas matching the contour shape of the side end of such trays, fully mimicking such shape in order to completely cover each of such respective areas below each folding area, such mat fully fitting the ends of such tray.

Claims

1. A paper mat (1) for fast food trays, characterized in that it comprises a central area (9) and, at both side ends, at least three and at most four folding areas (5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13) defined and divided from one another and regarding such central area (9) by parallel folding lines (2), matching each of such folding areas with the contour shape of the side end of such trays, fully mimicking such contour so as to completely cover each of such respective areas below each folding area, such mat fully fitting the side ends of such tray.

2. The paper mat according to claim 1, characterized in that it further comprises, between the second and the third folding areas (6, 7; 11, 12) considered from such central area (9), skew folding lines (3) intersecting at a point that is part of the parallel folding line dividing such second and third folding areas (6, 7; 11, 12), which defines an additional folding area, in order to mimic the contour of a tray with a curved or straight trapezoidal shape.

3. The paper mat according to claim 1, characterized in that it further comprises, on one or both longitudinal ends of such central area (9), at least one and at most two folding areas (18) divided from one another and regarding such central area (9) by at least one and at most two longitudinal folding lines (17).

4. The paper mat according to claim 3, characterized in that if it comprises on such one or both longitudinal ends of such central area (9) a single folding area (18), such single folding area fully or partially mimics the area of the tray therebelow.

5. The paper mat according to claim 3, characterized in that if it comprises, on such one or both longitudinal ends of such central area (9), a single folding area (18) on one of such longitudinal ends and two folding areas (18) on the other longitudinal end, such single folding area fully or partially mimics the area of the tray therebelow, and such two folding areas on such other longitudinal end fully mimics the area of the tray therebelow, such mat fitting such tray.

6. The paper mat according to claim 3, characterized in that if it comprises, on both longitudinal ends of such central area (9) two folding areas (18), each of such folding areas fully mimics the side contour shape of such tray in order to cover each of such respective areas below each of such two folding areas, such mat fitting such tray.

7. The paper mat according to claim 1, characterized in that the contour shape of such tray forms gripping regions for the user, both at the side ends and at the longitudinal ends of such trays, as well.

8. The paper mat according to claim 1, characterized in that such folding lines are printed, weakened or die-cut lines, or the like.

9. The paper mat according to claim 1, characterized in that it remains fully fit in such trays when in use.

10. The paper mat according to claim 1, characterized in that each of such folding areas has a smaller surface than such central area.

Description

(1) In order that the utility model is clearly interpreted and taken to the practice with ease, the illustrative drawings have been presented accompany this memory, in which:

(2) FIG. 1 is a top view of the tablecloth.

(3) FIG. 2 is a top view of the tablecloth, and a longitudinal cut of the tablecloth placed on the tray.

(4) FIG. 3 is a perspective of the tablecloth, the tray, and the tray with the handle protective tablecloth.

(5) FIG. 4 is a top view of the tray with a conventional tablecloth and with the handle protective tablecloth.

(6) FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the tray with a conventional tablecloth and with the handle protective tablecloth.

(7) FIG. 6 shows a tablecloth variant with weaknesses to fold the triangles and a complete rectangle that does not mark the handles diagonals.

(8) FIG. 7 shows a variant of the tablecloth covering the four edges of depth of the tray, being able (the longitudinal edges) to exceed the width of themselves.

(9) In FIG. 1 we see a top view of the tablecloth (1), with perforated folding lines (2) and with four drawings (3) that copy the shape of the diagonals from the tray.

(10) In FIG. 2 is a top view of the tablecloth (1), where we see the surfaces (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11), (12) and (13) that are separated by the lines perforated for folding. Such surfaces will be arranged as seen in the longitudinal cutting of the tablecloth placed in the tray (4).

(11) In FIG. 3 we see a perspective of the tablecloth (1), the tray (3), and the tray (3) in FIG. 3 we see a perspective of the tablecloth (1), the tray (3), and the tray (3) with the handle protective cover (1) placed, where the fold lines were observed.

(12) In FIG. 4 we have a top view (4a) of the tray (3) with a conventional tablecloth, and we see how the user's hands (14) grip the handles (15) of the tray (3) without any kind of protection. We also have a top view (4b) of the tray (3) with the new tablecloth, and we see how the user's hands (14) grip the handles (15) of the tray (3) with protection.

(13) In FIG. 5 we have a bottom view (4a) of the tray (3) with a conventional tablecloth, and we see how the user's hands (14) grip the handles (15) of the tray (3) without any kind of protection. We also have a bottom view (4b) of the tray (3) with the new tablecloth, and we see how the user's hands (14) grip the handles (15) of the tray (3) with protection.

(14) In FIG. 6 we have a top view (6a) of the tablecloth (1), where they are found in the form of a triangle, 4 sectors (16) (all with weaknesses on their edges), that folds and take the shape of the diagonals of the handles of the trays. We also have a top view (6b) of the tablecloth (1), where the lines of weakening (2) separate the surfaces which don't copy the diagonals of the tray handles.

(15) In FIG. 7 we have a top view (7a) of the new tablecloth (1), with the aggregate of two surfaces (17) that covers the four edges of the depth of the tray, as seen in the perspective of FIG. 7b).

(16) In FIG. 7c) you see one of the longitudinal edges (18), where there may be a surface in the two that exceeds the edge width, achieving in addition to the hygienic part, a sport for very important information or publicity.