STATIC DISSIPATIVE FLOORING SYSTEM
20220174804 · 2022-06-02
Inventors
Cpc classification
H05F3/025
ELECTRICITY
E04F15/107
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
International classification
E04F15/02
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
Abstract
The invention relates a method of creating a magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor covering (1), the method comprising the steps of:
providing a magnetically receptive floor surface (3);
providing a floor covering comprising a plurality of static dissipative, magnetic floor tiles (4), wherein the tiles (4) are held in place by magnetic interaction between the tiles (4) and the magnetically receptive surface (3).
Claims
1. A method of creating a magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor covering (1), the method comprising the steps of: providing a magnetically receptive floor surface (3); providing a floor covering comprising a plurality of static dissipative, magnetic floor tiles (4), wherein the tiles (4) are held in place by magnetic interaction between the tiles (4) and the magnetically receptive surface (3).
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the floor surface (3) is intrinsically magnetically receptive.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the floor surface (3) is provided with a magnetically receptive underlayment.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the magnetically receptive underlayment is formed by the application of a liquid coating composition comprising a polymeric binder and magnetic and/or magnetisable particles, wherein, in particular, the magnetic and/or magnetisable particles are selected from paramagnetic, superparamagnetic and/or ferromagnetic substances, preferably selected from the group comprising iron, iron oxides, in particular preferred mixed iron oxides with other metal oxides from the transition elements group like iron-nickel oxides, ferro-silicones or combinations thereof.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the polymeric binder of the coating composition comprises an air-drying resin, in particular an acrylic, alkyd, epoxy-ester or vinyl resin.
6. The method according to claim 4, wherein the polymeric binder comprises a two-part, thermosetting resin, in particular an epoxy, polyurethane or polyurea resin, wherein, in particular, the two-part thermosetting resin comprises at least one aliphatic poly-isocyanate component and at least one poly-aspartic acid ester component.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the floor tiles are of composite construction comprising a) a static dissipative vinyl wearing layer (5), b) an integral, conductive ground plane (6) and c) an integral, planar magnetic layer (7).
8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the static dissipative vinyl wearing layer (5) has a resistivity from 10.sup.6 ohm.cm to 10.sup.9 ohm.cm according to the ASTM D257 standard, and/or that the static dissipative vinyl wearing layer (5) has a static decay time (5,000 volts-0 volts) of less than 0.10 seconds according to the Federal TM 101B, Method 4046 standard.
9. The method according to claim 7, wherein the static dissipative vinyl wearing layer (5) has a resistivity from 2.5×10.sup.4 ohm.cm to 1×10.sup.6 ohm.cm according to the ASTM D257 standard, and/or that the static dissipative vinyl wearing layer (5) has a static decay time (5,000 volts-0 volts) of less than 0.03 seconds according to the Federal TM 101B, Method 4046 standard.
10. The method according to claim 7, wherein the conductive ground plane (6) comprises a non-woven synthetic fabric (8) with a Nickel-Copper coating and a conductive adhesive backing (9), wherein, in particular, the conductive ground plane (6) is bonded to the static dissipative wearing layer (5) by means of the conductive adhesive backing (9).
11. The method according to claim 7, wherein the conductive ground plane (6) comprises a conductive adhesive or coating composition containing graphene powder.
12. The method according to claim 7, wherein the conductive ground plane (6) has a sheet resistivity from 0.01 ohm/sq. to 0.10 ohm/sq. according to the ASTM F390 standard.
13. The method according to claim 7, wherein the planar magnetic layer (7) comprises a flexible, polymeric magnetic sheet which is bonded to the conductive ground plane by means of an adhesive, wherein, in particular, the adhesive is a pressure sensitive adhesive, and/or that the magnetic layer (7) has a magnetic remanence from 0.10 Tesla, in particular from 0.15 Tesla, to 0.50 Tesla, in particular to 0.25 Tesla and/or that the magnetic layer (7) has a magnetic coercivity from 39.750 A/m in particular from 95.500 A/m, to 239.000 A/m, in particular to 175.000 A/m.
14. The method according to claim 1, wherein the magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor covering system has a resistivity from 10.sup.6 ohm.cm to 10.sup.9 ohm.cm according to the ASTM D257 standard, and/or that the magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor covering system has a static decay time (5,000 volts-0 volts) of less than 0.10 seconds according to the Federal TM 101B, Method 4046 standard.
15. The method according to claim 1, wherein the magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor covering system has a resistivity from 2.5×10.sup.4 ohm.cm to 1×10.sup.6 ohm.cm according to the ASTM D257 standard, and/or that the magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor covering system has a static decay time (5,000 volts-0 volts) of less than 0.03 seconds according to the Federal TM 101B, Method 4046 standard.
16. The method according to claim 2, wherein the floor tiles are of composite construction comprising a) a static dissipative vinyl wearing layer (5), b) an integral, conductive ground plane (6) and c) an integral, planar magnetic layer (7).
17. The method according to claim 3, wherein the floor tiles are of composite construction comprising a) a static dissipative vinyl wearing layer (5), b) an integral, conductive ground plane (6) and c) an integral, planar magnetic layer (7).
18. The method according to claim 4, wherein the floor tiles are of composite construction comprising a) a static dissipative vinyl wearing layer (5), b) an integral, conductive ground plane (6) and c) an integral, planar magnetic layer (7).
19. The method according to claim 5, wherein the floor tiles are of composite construction comprising a) a static dissipative vinyl wearing layer (5), b) an integral, conductive ground plane (6) and c) an integral, planar magnetic layer (7).
20. The method according to claim 6, wherein the floor tiles are of composite construction comprising a) a static dissipative vinyl wearing layer (5), b) an integral, conductive ground plane (6) and c) an integral, planar magnetic layer (7).
Description
[0033] Further characteristics and advantages of the present invention become clear by the following description of magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor coverings with reference to the enclosed drawing. There is
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038] The floor covering 1 is composed of static dissipative, magnetic floor tiles 4 which can be placed on the magnetically receptive surface 3. Concretely the floor tiles 4 are of composite construction comprising a static dissipative vinyl wearing layer 5, an integral, conductive ground plane 6 and an integral, planar magnetic layer 7.
[0039] The conductive ground plane 6 is formed by a non-woven synthetic fabric 8 with a nickel-copper coating and a conductive adhesive backing. Presently a conductive adhesive 9 is applied onto the copper-nickel coated fabric 8 which allows an efficient bonding to the static dissipative vinyl wearing layer 5 on top. Alternatively, the conductive ground plane 6 could also be formed by a conductive adhesive composition comprising in particular a two-part, thermosetting polyurethane composition blended with graphene powder.
[0040] On the underside of the nickel-copper-fabric 8 the magnetic layer 7 is bonded by means of an adhesive layer 10. The magnetic layer 7 ensures that the tiles deposited on the substrate floor, respectively the magnetically receptive surface 3 are fixed at their position due to the magnetic interaction. At the same time the tiles 4 can easily be exchanged.
[0041] In
[0042] To create such a magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor covering 1, at first a magnetically receptive floor surface 3 has to be provided. After that a floor covering 1 has to be provided which comprises a plurality of static dissipative, magnetic floor tiles 4, wherein the tiles 4 are held in place by magnetic interaction between the tiles 4 and the magnetically receptive surface 3.
[0043]
[0044] The following examples are given for illustrative purposes only and are not meant to be a limitation of the scope of protection defined by the claims.
Example 1
[0045] Four Statguard® 8432 ESD Vinyl Floor Tiles (300 mm×300 mm×3.2 mm) commercially sold by Desco Industries Inc. were coated on the underside with a conductive adhesive composition formed by blending 12 parts by weight of GS030P graphene powder available from Graphene Star Ltd. with 100 parts by weight of Magna Tak polyurethane adhesive from Thortex America Inc. The conductive adhesive composition was applied using a serrated edge comb and then lightly rolled with a short nap roller to provide a thickness of approximately 500 microns. After allowing to gel for 2 hours, KM 101G magnetic sheet received from Kingfine Magnetics Ltd. was applied to the conductive layer. The composite tiles were allowed to cure overnight and then affixed to marine ply boards which had previously been treated with MS 870 Magnetised Floor System from IOBAC Ltd. The tiles were butted against each other in a two-dimensional array and surface resistivity measurements, as per the ASTM D257 standard, undertaken on tiles 4b, 4c, 4d in turn with respect to tile 4a, as per
Example 2
[0046] Four Statguard® 8432 ESD Vinyl Floor Tiles (300 mm×300 mm×3.2 mm) were coated on the underside with a conductive adhesive composition formed by blending 12 parts by weight of GS030P graphene powder commercially sold by Graphene Star Ltd. with 100 parts by weight of Magna Tak polyurethane adhesive. The conductive adhesive composition was applied using a serrated edge comb and then lightly rolled with a short nap roller to provide a thickness of approximately 500 microns. After allowing to gel for 2 hours, KM 501G magnetic sheet from Kingfine Magnetics Ltd. was applied to the conductive layer. The composite tiles were allowed to cure overnight and affixed to marine ply boards which had previously been treated with MS 870 Magnetised Floor System. The tiles were butted against each other in a two-dimensional array and surface resistivity measurements, as per the ASTM D257 standard, undertaken on tiles 4b, 4c, 4d in turn with respect to tile 4a, as per example 1.
Example 3
[0047] EMF RF Shielding Nickel Copper Fabric commercially sold by Faraday Defense was applied to the underside of four Statguard® 8432 ESD Vinyl Floor Tiles (300 mm×300 mm×3.2 mm). KMG 501G self-adhesive magnetic sheet was then affixed to the Nickel Copper fabric. The composite tiles were affixed to marine ply boards which had previously been treated with MS 870 Magnetised Floor System. The tiles were butted against each other in a two-dimensional array and surface resistivity measurements, as per the ASTM D257 standard, undertaken on tiles 4b, 4c, 4d in turn with respect to tile 4a, as per example 1.
Example 4
[0048] EMF RF Shielding Nickel Copper Fabric was applied to the underside of four Statguard® 8412 ESD Vinyl Floor Tiles (300 mm×300 mm×3.2 mm) commercially available from Desco Industries Ltd. KMG 101G self-adhesive magnetic sheet was then affixed to the Nickel Copper fabric. The composite tiles were affixed to marine ply boards which had previously been treated with MS 870 Magnetised Floor System. The tiles were butted against each other in a two-dimensional array and surface resistivity measurements, as per the ASTM D257 standard, undertaken on tiles 4b, 4c, 4d in turn with respect to tile 4a, as per example 1.
Example 5
[0049] EMF RF Shielding Nickel Copper Fabric was applied to the underside of four Statguard® 8412 ESD Vinyl Floor Tiles (300 mm×300 mm×3.2 mm). KMG 501G self-adhesive magnetic sheet was then affixed to the Nickel Copper fabric. The composite tiles were affixed to marine ply boards which had previously been treated with MS 870 Magnetised Floor System. The tiles were butted against each other in a two-dimensional array and surface resistivity measurements, as per the ASTM D257 standard, undertaken on tiles 4b, 4c, 4d in turn with respect to tile 4a, as per example 1.
[0050] The individual resistivity measurements recorded for Examples 1-5, as per the ASTM D257 standard, are detailed in Table 1 below.
TABLE-US-00001 Example Number Surface Resistivity Measurements (ohm .Math. cm) 1 5.0 × 10.sup.5 5.1 × 10.sup.5 4.8 × 10.sup.5 2 5.2 × 10.sup.5 5.5 × 10.sup.5 5.1 × 10.sup.5 3 1.0 × 10.sup.5 1.2 × 10.sup.7 1.2 × 10.sup.5 4 3.3 × 10.sup.7 3.7 × 10.sup.7 3.6 × 10.sup.7 5 3.5 × 10.sup.7 3.5 × 10.sup.7 3.8 × 10.sup.7
REFERENCE CHARACTER LIST
[0051] 1 Floor Covering
[0052] 2 Substrate Floor
[0053] 3 Magnetically receptive surface
[0054] 4 Tile
[0055] 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d Tile
[0056] 5 Vinyl wearing layer
[0057] 6 Conductive ground plane
[0058] 7 Magnetic layer
[0059] 8 Nickel-Copper fabric
[0060] 9 Adhesive backing
[0061] 10 Adhesive Layer
[0062] 11 Person
[0063] 12 Test electrode
[0064] 13 Reference electrode